Author Topic: Auto Bailout  (Read 14169 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

brawndolicious

  • Nylonhilist
  • Senior Member
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #60 on: December 10, 2008, 01:41:01 AM »
Oil rigs require engineers, operators, maintenance, aka lots of personnel in addition to the increased shipping and port personnel. The petroleum industry probably employs more people and probably at better jobs than the auto industry. Why not subsidize them?
Because American cities would not be all that devastated by not having more oil rigs off shore or in Alaska.

I'd imagine that the average oil rig operator, engineer, etc. is used to traveling around.

Beardo

  • Member
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #61 on: December 10, 2008, 01:43:57 AM »
But think of the middle class jobs. Why do you hate the middle class so?

SMH @ double standards

recursivelyenumerable

  • you might think that; I couldn't possibly comment
  • Senior Member
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #62 on: December 10, 2008, 01:45:17 AM »
before I read your spoiler text I was all set to reply with "usually those parts concerned with situations featuring a small set of economic actors aka oligopoly/oligopsony" :(

spoiler (click to show/hide)
I am especially sad to be deprived of a chance to use the word "oligopsony" which is so cool my spellchecker doesn't even know it
[close]
« Last Edit: December 10, 2008, 01:49:25 AM by recursivelyenumerable »
QED

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #63 on: December 10, 2008, 01:46:06 AM »
The petroleum industry probably employs more people and probably at better jobs than the auto industry.

Wait, I thought the problem was that the UAW had strongarmed the Big Three into providing jobs that were too good, making their business model unsustainable.

 ???

brawndolicious

  • Nylonhilist
  • Senior Member
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #64 on: December 10, 2008, 01:46:18 AM »
But think of the middle class jobs. Why do you hate the middle class so?

SMH @ double standards
Because the middle class isn't just any job in a certain tax bracket.

Beardo

  • Member
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #65 on: December 10, 2008, 01:56:51 AM »
My dad worked his whole life in the oil industry and lol @ typical jobs being better than auto jobs. :lol :lol :lol

I wasn't talking about janitors.  ::)

Beardo

  • Member
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #66 on: December 10, 2008, 01:58:12 AM »
The petroleum industry probably employs more people and probably at better jobs than the auto industry.

Wait, I thought the problem was that the UAW had strongarmed the Big Three into providing jobs that were too good, making their business model unsustainable.


I meant that the petroleum industry hires more engineers and less assembly line workers.

Beardo

  • Member
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #67 on: December 10, 2008, 02:04:49 AM »
What did your dad do? My university had a whole department and building for petroleum, i dont know of any college that has an automotive department.

Beardo

  • Member
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #68 on: December 10, 2008, 02:11:58 AM »
They didn't have a mechanical engineering department??? Biggest engineering department at my wife's school.  weird.

Yeah I bet all the UAW members have mechanical engineer degrees. LOL

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #69 on: December 10, 2008, 02:12:12 AM »
i dont know of any college that has an automotive department.

Allow me to assist you.


Plus what Cohen said.

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #70 on: December 10, 2008, 02:14:52 AM »
Dude, they had a building for petroleum.

A building.

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #71 on: December 10, 2008, 02:27:38 AM »
Total number of engineers employed by industry, as of the most recent data in 2001:

Oil and gas extraction  13,000

Motor vehicles and equipment  26,100


BLSFTW.

Bocsius

  • is calmer than you are
  • Senior Member
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #72 on: December 10, 2008, 08:59:47 AM »
Beardo is like 19, living at home and/or a dorm, and the most major bill he's ever paid in his life is his auto insurance bill, right? Other than that, no responsibilities? Spends 12-3 (ET) listening to Rush Limbaugh because what else would a guy be doing during that time? Because he argues like I did when I fit all those metrics. Then I got of college and entered the real world.

Beardo

  • Member
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #73 on: December 10, 2008, 09:19:28 AM »
Total number of engineers employed by industry, as of the most recent data in 2001:

Oil and gas extraction  13,000

Motor vehicles and equipment  26,100
Pulling shit out of your ass again I see.


Petroleum is far far bigger than just "oil and gas extraction" I'll help you out, after extraction there is transportation and then refining. Both are huge parts of the process, but I guess you think they just drill for it and then bring it to your gas station.  :lol

And all the products made from petroleum like PVC are an added part to the sector.


OMBBB! MANDARK JUST GOT OWNED
« Last Edit: December 10, 2008, 09:26:05 AM by Beardo »

Bocsius

  • is calmer than you are
  • Senior Member
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #74 on: December 10, 2008, 09:30:10 AM »
Are the facts of oil being an environmental concern and increased domestic drilling would only serve to reinforce our addiction to it lost upon you?

Beardo

  • Member
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #75 on: December 10, 2008, 09:35:43 AM »
Back to my point. Why be hypocritical and support one industry and not another. Clearly the petroleum industry is competent enough to not run them selves into the ground They employ middle class people. If you can argue for the auto bailout on the claim that we need to help middle class people, then you have to argue for allowing drilling offshore and in Alaska because of all the middle class jobs it will create. Not only that, but "allowing them to drill off shores" wont cost taxpayers $100 billion or however much you guys think they need.

So here are the two examples.

1. Bailout one industry that has been slowly failing over the past decade by giving them billions of Taxpayers dollars.
2. Allow off shore drilling and drilling on American soil to allow for cheaper energy and more jobs, not costing the taxpayers anything.


Please justify supporting #1 without supporting #2.

Quote
Are the facts of oil being an environmental concern and increased domestic drilling would only serve to reinforce our addiction to it lost upon you?

But the American auto makers make the biggest gas guzzlers on the planet. You are supporting them right?

Brehvolution

  • Until at last, I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin upon the mountainside.
  • Senior Member
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #76 on: December 10, 2008, 09:41:17 AM »
Jan. 20th is taking for fucking ever to get here. :maf

Obama needs to bitch slap these spineless democrats.

"Oh, you don't like that measure republicans? Ok, we'll drop it and move forward."

SMH
©ZH

drew

  • sy
  • Senior Member
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #77 on: December 10, 2008, 09:46:33 AM »
yay

Bocsius

  • is calmer than you are
  • Senior Member
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #78 on: December 10, 2008, 10:22:08 AM »
Quote
Are the facts of oil being an environmental concern and increased domestic drilling would only serve to reinforce our addiction to it lost upon you?

But the American auto makers make the biggest gas guzzlers on the planet. You are supporting them right?


Part of the bailout legislation was geared to force tighter emission / fuel economy standards on the big three and it just so happens that my fellow Republicans are actively trying to remove those clauses from the legislation. Go go GOP. Fight for the little people oil execs.

Beardo

  • Member
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #79 on: December 10, 2008, 10:30:02 AM »
Do you think the big three will produce more fuel efficiant cars like the hybrid when this is passed?

tiesto

  • ルカルカ★ナイトフィーバー
  • Senior Member
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #80 on: December 10, 2008, 10:58:05 AM »
Based on what I know, the bailout makes sense, but there must be the stipulation that the big 3 need to make more energy efficient cars. What do you guys think should happen with the UAW?
^_^

Beardo

  • Member
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #81 on: December 10, 2008, 10:59:18 AM »
Do you think the big three will produce more fuel efficiant cars like the hybrid when this is passed?

They damn well better.  I'm pretty sure the government insists on it.

And everything that the government insists should happen will happen?

This is what I foresee happening. The big three promise to make better cars, promise to hire more Americans etc... They take our money. In 5-10 years they are in front of congress explaining what went wrong. Nobody bought their cars, the economy was bad etcc.. and then at the end they will ask the taxpayers for even more money. Maybe I'm too cynical.

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #82 on: December 10, 2008, 11:59:06 AM »
Back to my point. Why be hypocritical and support one industry and not another. Clearly the petroleum industry is competent enough to not run them selves into the ground They employ middle class people. If you can argue for the auto bailout on the claim that we need to help middle class people, then you have to argue for allowing drilling offshore and in Alaska because of all the middle class jobs it will create. Not only that, but "allowing them to drill off shores" wont cost taxpayers $100 billion or however much you guys think they need.

So here are the two examples.

1. Bailout one industry that has been slowly failing over the past decade by giving them billions of Taxpayers dollars.
2. Allow off shore drilling and drilling on American soil to allow for cheaper energy and more jobs, not costing the taxpayers anything.


Please justify supporting #1 without supporting #2.

Not jumping into this argument, this is just a thought.  I wonder if the big oil and gasline corporations will be able to sustain their workforce, wages and pensions when the oil industry really starts to struggle.  The Big Three were fine until foreign competition and a change in markets hit. 

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #83 on: December 10, 2008, 03:10:40 PM »
Manufacturing - Petroleum and coal products  4,600

Wholesale trade -  Petroleum and petroleum products  400

Gasoline service stations  100



Of course, if we're going to include the attendant industries...


Automotive dealers and service stations   1,100

Auto repair, services, and parking   500

Wholesale trade - Motor vehicles, parts, and supplies  1,300



corrected in edit (I was awarding an extra ~9,000 jobs to the petroleum industry)
« Last Edit: December 10, 2008, 03:28:28 PM by Mandark »

patrickula

  • Member
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #84 on: December 10, 2008, 03:32:51 PM »
I'm not worried about the big 3 (well, Ford and GM anyway) taking the money and then not making better cars because they ALREADY ARE making better cars in recent times AND in the near future.

GM and Ford's real problem's are organizational ones, as well as a lingering (and previously justified) image problem which none of this is helping in the least.

btw how about the house Republicans' alternate bill  :lol

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #85 on: December 10, 2008, 03:42:10 PM »
btw how about the house Republicans' alternate bill  :lol

Oh lordy I haven't heard about this.  What's it entail?

Bocsius

  • is calmer than you are
  • Senior Member
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #86 on: December 10, 2008, 03:53:25 PM »
Probably gives tax breaks to the auto execs.

patrickula

  • Member
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #87 on: December 10, 2008, 03:54:36 PM »
btw how about the house Republicans' alternate bill  :lol

Oh lordy I haven't heard about this.  What's it entail?
http://www.politico.com/blogs/thecrypt/1208/House_GOP_proposes_autoindustryfunded_insurance_program.html
Quote
"Rather than a taxpayer-funded government bailout that replaces private investment,," explains a leadership memo, "the House GOP plan proposes that the government provide insurance, funded by the participants with a modest FDIC-like fee, which would cover up to 50 percent of the losses of new investment in the case of default, helping to unlock immediate private investment."
So instead of the government loaning the big 3 money, instead it will insure 50% of new private investment... because GM stock would be so much more appealing that way.

Beardo

  • Member
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #88 on: December 10, 2008, 05:36:59 PM »
Probably gives tax breaks to the auto execs.

Yeah thats so much worse than giving them 15 billion dollars.


@Mandark, Im still not sure where you are puling all those numbers from. Stuff like this means nothing


Quote
Manufacturing - Petroleum and coal products  4,600

Because there are more Petroleum manufacturing jobs in the Houston port area alone.
« Last Edit: December 10, 2008, 05:38:33 PM by Beardo »

Beardo

  • Member
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #89 on: December 10, 2008, 06:12:52 PM »
http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/table2.pdf

This?

I didnt see any engineers listed under Motor Vehicle manufacturing.   ???

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #90 on: December 11, 2008, 12:16:43 AM »
For the record, I'm using http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf05313/

http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/table2.pdf

This?

I didnt see any engineers listed under Motor Vehicle manufacturing.   ???

I didnt see any engineers listed under Motor Vehicle manufacturing.   ???

I didnt see any engineers listed under Motor Vehicle manufacturing.   ???



...





Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #91 on: December 11, 2008, 12:30:32 AM »
But the building!
©@©™

ToxicAdam

  • captain of my capsized ship
  • Senior Member
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #92 on: December 11, 2008, 12:49:15 AM »
Use lube next time. Think about the precious blood vessels you are rupturing.


off topic, but does any just sit there and stare at Blagojevich's hair? It seems impossible that a man his age could possess such a helmet of hair.


« Last Edit: December 11, 2008, 12:51:11 AM by ToxicAdam »

siamesedreamer

  • Senior Member
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #93 on: December 11, 2008, 09:48:33 AM »
I'm jealous of it.

Also, I've seen one pic of his wife where she looked fantastic - kinda in the mold of Kate Bekinsale. But, all the others I've seen of her she's slightly ugly.

siamesedreamer

  • Senior Member
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #94 on: December 11, 2008, 09:55:43 AM »
The only point of this bill is to buy the DEMs time to pass Card Check so the UAW will have an upper hand when the next debate happens in March/April. Its sickening Bush is going along with it (but completely expected) and its awesome how the GOP seems to want to fillibuster the fuck out of it. 

The Fake Shemp

  • Ebola Carrier
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #95 on: December 11, 2008, 11:25:49 AM »
I almost want to archive this.
PSP

Eric P

  • I DESERVE the gold. I will GET the gold!
  • Icon
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #96 on: December 11, 2008, 11:27:26 AM »
looks like we need a beardo bailout
Tonya

The Fake Shemp

  • Ebola Carrier
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #97 on: December 11, 2008, 11:30:45 AM »
Think of the posting jobs we'd lose if we didn't bailout Beardo.
PSP

Eric P

  • I DESERVE the gold. I will GET the gold!
  • Icon
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #98 on: December 11, 2008, 11:37:30 AM »
we would soon be overrun with japanese posters

or worse, posters from japan moving to america
Tonya

Eric P

  • I DESERVE the gold. I will GET the gold!
  • Icon
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #99 on: December 11, 2008, 05:33:43 PM »
Tonya

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #100 on: December 11, 2008, 05:52:21 PM »
I have some alternative car designs I need to start working on pronto. To the toolshed!
©@©™

Brehvolution

  • Until at last, I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin upon the mountainside.
  • Senior Member
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #101 on: December 11, 2008, 06:25:12 PM »
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/12/business/12auto.html

no bailout

beardo prevails!



War on the middle class continues. Labor costs are less than 10% of a vehicles price but let's cut their wages to the same as foreign companies pay their employees?!?
©ZH

Beardo

  • Member
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #102 on: December 11, 2008, 06:30:06 PM »
Not taking middle class tax money and giving it to the shitty companies.   :usacry

TakingBackSunday

  • Banana Grabber
  • Senior Member
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #103 on: December 11, 2008, 08:17:54 PM »
Thus killing said middle class :usacry
püp

Brehvolution

  • Until at last, I threw down my enemy and smote his ruin upon the mountainside.
  • Senior Member
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #104 on: December 11, 2008, 09:30:17 PM »
It's happening regardless.

Maybe I can be middle class again when I'm 45.
©ZH

Van Cruncheon

  • live mas or die trying
  • Banned
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #105 on: December 11, 2008, 11:02:35 PM »
now it's not happening: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28166218/

unions are refusing to agree to wage cuts

well, they're gonna get their wages cut anyway, good jon nascar america

america fucked
« Last Edit: December 11, 2008, 11:06:55 PM by Professor Prole »
duc

Bocsius

  • is calmer than you are
  • Senior Member
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #106 on: December 11, 2008, 11:04:52 PM »
Yep, unions will have their wages cut 100% at this rate.

There's something to be said about how much union workers are paid by the big three. But there's also something to be said about how much those executives are being paid. It's hard to tell Joe the Assembly Line Worker to take a cut when the CEO is making 100x Joe's salary.
« Last Edit: December 11, 2008, 11:07:37 PM by Bocsius »

huckleberry

  • Senior Member
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #107 on: December 11, 2008, 11:13:10 PM »
 :o



I guess it is on now. 


Fuck.

wub

Van Cruncheon

  • live mas or die trying
  • Banned
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #108 on: December 11, 2008, 11:19:57 PM »
2 GREAT 2 DEPRESSING
duc

Bocsius

  • is calmer than you are
  • Senior Member
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #109 on: December 11, 2008, 11:24:50 PM »
So after the auto industry goes belly up, what will be left that Americans make? Hamburgers? Is that about it?

Van Cruncheon

  • live mas or die trying
  • Banned
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #110 on: December 11, 2008, 11:27:50 PM »
talk radio hosts and teenaged serial killers
duc

Bocsius

  • is calmer than you are
  • Senior Member
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #111 on: December 11, 2008, 11:29:23 PM »
And television crime dramas.

:bow America :bow2

huckleberry

  • Senior Member
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #112 on: December 11, 2008, 11:30:31 PM »
My brother lives in Detroit and works for the auto industry (not UAW).  :(

I hope he doesn't have bad news when he comes down for Christmas.
wub

Olivia Wilde Homo

  • Proud Kinkshamer
  • Senior Member
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #113 on: December 11, 2008, 11:32:07 PM »
My roommate works for a railroad company and a lot of laborers are "laying down" (not working) their shifts to protest the job cuts that are going to come here soon.  As a result, there are now several hour delays for deliveries.

Shit is getting close to hitting the fan.
« Last Edit: December 11, 2008, 11:33:43 PM by T EXP »
🍆🍆

Bocsius

  • is calmer than you are
  • Senior Member
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #114 on: December 11, 2008, 11:34:24 PM »
That's a great idea.

"You may lay me off, and guess what? I'm going to make your decision that much easier!"

TakingBackSunday

  • Banana Grabber
  • Senior Member
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #115 on: December 11, 2008, 11:35:23 PM »
This shit is just depressing
püp

TakingBackSunday

  • Banana Grabber
  • Senior Member
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #116 on: December 11, 2008, 11:39:38 PM »
Whoever loses, the free market wins

err...wait
püp

Bocsius

  • is calmer than you are
  • Senior Member
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #117 on: December 11, 2008, 11:40:35 PM »
Asian markets are down 6.5-7% right now.

Van Cruncheon

  • live mas or die trying
  • Banned
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #118 on: December 11, 2008, 11:43:02 PM »
tomorrow is gonna be a bad day for the dow

thanks, republicans

duc

TakingBackSunday

  • Banana Grabber
  • Senior Member
Re: Auto Bailout
« Reply #119 on: December 11, 2008, 11:45:16 PM »
Don't worry, the invisible hand of the free market will guide us through
püp