Author Topic: FitnessBore - 2018 edition  (Read 814154 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #600 on: February 19, 2010, 03:29:35 PM »
wake your wife up!  get some cardio and it will help you fall asleep.  it's saturday there right?

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #601 on: February 19, 2010, 03:31:22 PM »
I always see a bunch of guys using the smith machines for bench but doing very little weight and literally throwing it in the air and catching it, coming down and on the way up throwing it up again.

Technically that would be a plyometric exercise, but it seems sort of daft. Why not just do explosive push ups? You should ask them that, and also ask them to demonstrate such push ups.
hahaha

the last time I asked a guy about what he was doing, he was so hopped up on testosterone that he took offensive and thought I was criticizing his routine.  I just had no idea what the fuck he was doing and was genuinely interested!

Cormacaroni

  • Poster of the Forever
  • Senior Member
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #602 on: February 19, 2010, 03:32:13 PM »
Saturday morning, yes. Yeah, why not. You never know your luck. alright, later folks.
vjj

Ganhyun

  • Used to worship Muckhole. Now worships Robo.
  • Senior Member
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #603 on: February 19, 2010, 03:32:58 PM »
coolest thing about my gym is the 68 year old trainer who is as strong or stronger than most of the roided up body builders and beats 18-20 yr olds in bodybuilding competitions.
XDF

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #604 on: February 19, 2010, 03:35:46 PM »
Saturday morning, yes. Yeah, why not. You never know your luck. alright, later folks.
later!

coolest thing about my gym is the 68 year old trainer who is as strong or stronger than most of the roided up body builders and beats 18-20 yr olds in bodybuilding competitions.
hahaha

The coolest thing about my gym is all the fucking milfs and hot girlfriends who come just to watch their roided out boyfriends lift.  These women don't do any exercise themselves, but they're still wearing tight ass spandex.  Fuck man.

worst thing?  all the old dudes letting their shit hang out everywhere in the locker room.  especially when they start talking to you all excited and you know that if you move your eyeballs a centimeter south a wiggling worm is bouncing around like it took a bump of meth down there.

Ganhyun

  • Used to worship Muckhole. Now worships Robo.
  • Senior Member
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #605 on: February 19, 2010, 03:47:03 PM »
Saturday morning, yes. Yeah, why not. You never know your luck. alright, later folks.
later!

coolest thing about my gym is the 68 year old trainer who is as strong or stronger than most of the roided up body builders and beats 18-20 yr olds in bodybuilding competitions.
hahaha

The coolest thing about my gym is all the fucking milfs and hot girlfriends who come just to watch their roided out boyfriends lift.  These women don't do any exercise themselves, but they're still wearing tight ass spandex.  Fuck man.

worst thing?  all the old dudes letting their shit hang out everywhere in the locker room.  especially when they start talking to you all excited and you know that if you move your eyeballs a centimeter south a wiggling worm is bouncing around like it took a bump of meth down there.

lol we have that here too sadly. I've learned the best times to go to avoid the old people though. We have a few hot milfs and such that do some of the classes too, but not alot right now sadly.
XDF

duckman2000

  • A lot of shit pisses me off
  • Senior Member
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #606 on: February 19, 2010, 04:08:47 PM »
especially when they start talking to you all excited and you know that if you move your eyeballs a centimeter south a wiggling worm is bouncing around like it took a bump of meth down there.

+ 1 for working out at home. The only excited naked dude I'm likely to meet in the shower is myself, and I already try to seduce myself in the mirror post-workout anyway.

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #607 on: February 20, 2010, 10:34:15 AM »
So last night I hit the gym again because of some anger issues. I moved up to 185 on bench and 215 on squat. But I had to bail on the last Rep of bench. I barely made it onto the lower rest things!  That shit was kinda scary. I should have known better

archie4208

  • Senior Member
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #608 on: February 20, 2010, 12:32:59 PM »
260 has been defeated. :rock  But I think I will redo it again Monday since the last two sets were very sloppy.  Also, I got very nervous as I was heading to the doors at the Y.  I was ready to head back to the car and go home.  Squats instill fear in the hearts of men. :lol

The Fake Shemp

  • Ebola Carrier
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #609 on: February 21, 2010, 12:25:58 AM »
Forgive me father Cormacaroni, for I have sinned: I purchased and ate an entire personal pan pizza from Pizza Hut.

The only thing I can say for myself is that I did my daily 41 minutes of cardio, two sets of crunches and dumbbell curls. Even with the pizza, that really only puts me at 1,500 calories for the day.
PSP

demi

  • cooler than willco
  • Administrator
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #610 on: February 21, 2010, 12:26:32 AM »
 8)
fat

Cormacaroni

  • Poster of the Forever
  • Senior Member
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #611 on: February 21, 2010, 12:29:54 AM »
I feel as if I'm in a fight with demi for your very soul, Willco.

Then again, I made pizza for the fam last night, and will be having leftovers today 8)
vjj

The Fake Shemp

  • Ebola Carrier
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #612 on: February 21, 2010, 12:32:15 AM »
Like I said, I only consumed 800 calories for the day prior to the pizza! That's worth something, right? :-\

It's pretty mind boggling that a personal pan pizza accounts for almost half my calories for the day. It really puts things in perspective. I just wish I had not eaten it so late - there was no time for dinner in between working out and going to the movies. By the time I was out, Pizza Hut was the only thing open.
PSP

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #613 on: February 21, 2010, 12:46:24 AM »
There are some foods that can account for your entire calories for the day!

I had a large blizzard from dairy queen with cookie dough and oreos.  mmmmmm  my special treat for the week.

Cormacaroni

  • Poster of the Forever
  • Senior Member
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #614 on: February 21, 2010, 02:04:04 AM »
Like I said, I only consumed 800 calories for the day prior to the pizza! That's worth something, right? :-\

It's pretty mind boggling that a personal pan pizza accounts for almost half my calories for the day. It really puts things in perspective. I just wish I had not eaten it so late - there was no time for dinner in between working out and going to the movies. By the time I was out, Pizza Hut was the only thing open.

Don't get so caught up in calories, Willco. The digestive system is more complex than that, as you're already discovering (when you expected to lose weight that time but didn't). You need to consider insulin response just as much as the calorie figures.
vjj

Olivia Wilde Homo

  • Proud Kinkshamer
  • Senior Member
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #615 on: February 21, 2010, 10:05:52 AM »
800 calories total for a day?

I see a big plateau coming up here.
🍆🍆

archie4208

  • Senior Member
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #616 on: February 21, 2010, 10:09:06 AM »
It sounds like he had 800 calories before the pizza.  Don't fret, Willco.  A cheat meal every week is good to help keep yourself motivated.

Olivia Wilde Homo

  • Proud Kinkshamer
  • Senior Member
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #617 on: February 21, 2010, 10:11:59 AM »
It sounds like he had 800 calories before the pizza.  Don't fret, Willco.  A cheat meal every week is good to help keep yourself motivated.

Yeah, after reading it again, that sounds right.  Thanks for pointing that out.

Speaking of which, I had a cheat day yesterday.  I had the Bacon and Blue burger from Wendy's and omg...

I should learn to cook so I can make better cheat meals than to hit up Wendy's.
🍆🍆

The Fake Shemp

  • Ebola Carrier
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #618 on: February 21, 2010, 11:54:02 AM »
Yeah, that was before the pizza. I topped out at 1,500 for yesterday.
PSP

archie4208

  • Senior Member
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #619 on: February 21, 2010, 12:31:51 PM »
Yeah, that was before the pizza. I topped out at 1,500 for yesterday.

That's all?  :wag

Don't cut your calories short because you had an unplanned cheat meal.  Just accept you made a mistake and move on.
« Last Edit: February 21, 2010, 12:34:14 PM by archie4208 »

The Fake Shemp

  • Ebola Carrier
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #620 on: February 21, 2010, 01:03:59 PM »
I honestly didn't!

I had a bowl of oatmeal for breakfast, some grilled chicken strips and pikefish for lunch (with half a cup of greek yogurt), a Kashi protein/fiber bar in the afternoon and then the pizza later that night. I would have eaten earlier, but I had to race to the movies after I worked out.
PSP

Draft

  • Member
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #621 on: February 21, 2010, 02:27:08 PM »
Forgive me father Cormacaroni, for I have sinned: I purchased and ate an entire personal pan pizza from Pizza Hut.

The only thing I can say for myself is that I did my daily 41 minutes of cardio, two sets of crunches and dumbbell curls. Even with the pizza, that really only puts me at 1,500 calories for the day.
What do you mean, even with the pizza? Are you offsetting your total calorie intake with whatever calories were "burned" during exercise?

If so, don't do that. It doesn't work that way. Whatever you eat, that's your calorie count.

duckman2000

  • A lot of shit pisses me off
  • Senior Member
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #622 on: February 21, 2010, 04:26:19 PM »
I don't get this, though. Are you straight up counting calories, as in all sources being the same and the number being the most crucial thing, or do you actually separate the values depending on the source? I've seen some people do the former, and that's never made much sense to me.

The Fake Shemp

  • Ebola Carrier
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #623 on: February 21, 2010, 04:30:35 PM »
How would I separate calories? Calories are calories.

If you're talking about monitoring how much protein, fat and carbs I eat, I do that as well.

... No, Draft, I ate 1,500 calories. The end.
PSP

duckman2000

  • A lot of shit pisses me off
  • Senior Member
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #624 on: February 21, 2010, 04:47:25 PM »
I see some people look at calorie count first and product content second (if at all), that's what I'm talking about. So they basically rob themselves of energy indiscriminately. The only situation I can think of where that would be a good idea would be if some dude wants to do absolutely nothing and not turn tubby.

In other news, the gremlin has finally made herself useful. Feels pretty stupid doing push-ups with a kid on your back, but that's an added 40lbs of resistance.
« Last Edit: February 21, 2010, 04:51:36 PM by duckman2000 »

The Fake Shemp

  • Ebola Carrier
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #625 on: February 21, 2010, 05:25:32 PM »
The number matters the most to me, because honestly, if you keep things relatively low calorie, that means you are keeping things low fat and low carb. It's not like you can really go crazy eating sweets and red meat and stuff while counting your calories.

I mean, there are times when a lot of calories in something is somewhat good for you. Like I use a tbsp of extra light olive oil with some dishes. That alone is 120 calories, but the nutritional content is stuff my body can use.
PSP

Draft

  • Member
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #626 on: February 21, 2010, 06:13:21 PM »
I only ask because some cat in the GAF fitness thread was talking about counting calories, and he was saying stuff like, for the week he'd be at 2,000 a day if you offset what he ate with what he burned off doing cardio, and I was like bro, you are eating in excess of your maintenance level by like... hundreds of calories.

Anyway you should eat more than 1500 calories a day and also eat more fat.

The Fake Shemp

  • Ebola Carrier
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #627 on: February 21, 2010, 06:15:51 PM »
I try. I just eat when I'm hungry 'till I'm full.

And to be fair to that guy, I know plenty of people that use calories burned to offset calories taken in. You can calculate how many calories your body actually needs, and if exercise in excess of that, the calories burned do count.
« Last Edit: February 21, 2010, 06:17:41 PM by The Fake Shemp »
PSP

Draft

  • Member
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #628 on: February 21, 2010, 06:17:14 PM »
That's pussy talk. Eat with a purpose.

Edit: No, it never counts. Never. What you eat, you eat. You don't get to cram 3 thousand calories a day and the feel good about yourself because the elliptical machine says you burned off 1k. The machine is stupid.

The only control you have over calories is what goes in. What goes out... who can say.
« Last Edit: February 21, 2010, 06:22:27 PM by Draft »

The Fake Shemp

  • Ebola Carrier
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #629 on: February 21, 2010, 06:43:30 PM »
You can calculate how many calories you burned, though. It's not magic.

I'm not saying you should necessarily trust what any piece of cardio equipment says, because those are rarely accurate - but technology now exists that can tell you how much you burned.

So yes, if you eat 3,000 calories and you offset that by burning 1,000 - you're in good shape.
PSP

Draft

  • Member
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #630 on: February 21, 2010, 06:51:37 PM »
Good luck with this calorie counting "technology."

duckman2000

  • A lot of shit pisses me off
  • Senior Member
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #631 on: February 21, 2010, 07:26:45 PM »
Alright, fresh question. With a "routine" that involves squats, what the hell does one do to avoid getting a damned bubble butt? Right now it's still squarely in the aging pornstar territory, but I can tell where this is heading.

Draft

  • Member
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #632 on: February 21, 2010, 07:31:53 PM »
Why would you not want a firm, round behind?

Front squats and high bar squats engage the quads more and the butt/hamstrings less. Just do front squats.

Cormacaroni

  • Poster of the Forever
  • Senior Member
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #633 on: February 21, 2010, 08:21:56 PM »
Alright, fresh question. With a "routine" that involves squats, what the hell does one do to avoid getting a damned bubble butt? Right now it's still squarely in the aging pornstar territory, but I can tell where this is heading.

Yeah, I need to do something about these rippling biceps, oaken shoulders, washboard stomach and steely thighs as well :gloomy
vjj

duckman2000

  • A lot of shit pisses me off
  • Senior Member
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #634 on: February 21, 2010, 08:26:04 PM »
Firm and round is fine, I just don't want a freakish balloon rump

Yeah, I need to do something about these rippling biceps, oaken shoulders, washboard stomach and steely thighs as well :gloomy

Truth be told, I think the wife is getting mildly tired of me complaining about my frame becoming just a bit too beautiful. Also, comments like "my beautiful legs sure do hurt from all that heavy liftin'!" seem to inspire less chuckles with each repetition. All this beauty puts a strain on my act.  :gloomy
« Last Edit: February 21, 2010, 08:28:45 PM by duckman2000 »

Cormacaroni

  • Poster of the Forever
  • Senior Member
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #635 on: February 21, 2010, 08:26:51 PM »
Well, when you get there...stop squatting for a while.
vjj

Draft

  • Member
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #636 on: February 21, 2010, 08:33:44 PM »
Firm and round is fine, I just don't want a freakish balloon rump

Yeah, I need to do something about these rippling biceps, oaken shoulders, washboard stomach and steely thighs as well :gloomy

Truth be told, I think the wife is getting mildly tired of me complaining about my frame becoming just a bit too beautiful. Also, comments like "my beautiful legs sure do hurt from all that heavy liftin'!" seem to inspire less chuckles with each repetition. All this beauty puts a strain on my act.  :gloomy

Listen to yourself. You're like one of these women afraid to touch a barbell because they'll "blow up."

You won't get a huge, powerful ass unless you squat heavy and eat like crazy. Unless you are one of those sons of bitches who get swole if they glance at dumb bell. In which case, God damn you.

archie4208

  • Senior Member
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #637 on: February 21, 2010, 08:35:51 PM »
duckman just wants to "tone up" :teehee

duckman2000

  • A lot of shit pisses me off
  • Senior Member
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #638 on: February 21, 2010, 08:38:36 PM »
Hey, I'm quite happy with what I have right now. Although if I would change anything, I'd probably cut down a bit on the eating because the mid section has gotten out of control as of late.

Cormacaroni

  • Poster of the Forever
  • Senior Member
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #639 on: February 21, 2010, 08:40:26 PM »
He's always pretty vague, but he usually implies that he's pretty huge already. In which case, it may well be a legitimate concern. If you don't need to be any stronger, why get bigger?

But the answer is still the same: once you get to that point, just ease off for a while and work on something else. Get good at running or rowing and watch that muscle melt away!
vjj

duckman2000

  • A lot of shit pisses me off
  • Senior Member
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #640 on: February 21, 2010, 08:51:06 PM »
I'm thinking things will get under control once I get more naturally active, which has sort of been the whole point of getting into lifting weights in the first place. I think the more time I spend specifically working out (aka simulation), the more I focus on stupid shit like uneven muscletudiness and a protruding butt.   :gloomy
« Last Edit: February 21, 2010, 08:53:00 PM by duckman2000 »

The Fake Shemp

  • Ebola Carrier
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #641 on: February 21, 2010, 09:19:52 PM »
Peeked at the scale today. We're are at 40 lbs. of weight loss in two months.
PSP

duckman2000

  • A lot of shit pisses me off
  • Senior Member
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #642 on: February 21, 2010, 09:21:50 PM »
That's crazy

Cormacaroni

  • Poster of the Forever
  • Senior Member
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #643 on: February 21, 2010, 09:25:20 PM »
Take a bow, Willco. :rock

vjj

The Fake Shemp

  • Ebola Carrier
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #644 on: February 21, 2010, 09:38:20 PM »
Thanks, guys. That still puts me at only 335 lbs., so I still have a long way to go.

Went to breakfast today, and a family friend commented on the weight loss without any prodding. Felt good. :rock
PSP

Cormacaroni

  • Poster of the Forever
  • Senior Member
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #645 on: February 21, 2010, 09:39:38 PM »
Bet you secretly wanted him to prod you though  :-*
vjj

The Fake Shemp

  • Ebola Carrier
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #646 on: February 21, 2010, 09:39:47 PM »
 :-*
PSP

archie4208

  • Senior Member
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #647 on: February 21, 2010, 09:51:17 PM »
Peeked at the scale today. We're are at 40 lbs. of weight loss in two months.

That's insane.  Keep up the good work. :rock :rock :rock

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #648 on: February 21, 2010, 10:24:06 PM »
Hell yeah, will!  Good job man. It only gets better when everyone mentions it. Its been over a year since I lost 60 pounds and people still ask me how I lost all the weight. Keep it up.

On the flipside, I weighed myself today. I gained about 10 lbs in muscle mass and I have still managed to cut fat. Especially around my abs. Feels good man

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #649 on: February 21, 2010, 10:30:07 PM »
Oh and im also up to 63 pushups in 3 sets. When I started I was only able to do about 25. That was about two weeks ago? 

And I'm up to 144 situps in 3 sets. When I started it was like 35. Sad.

My goal is 300 situps and 90 pushups.

Cormacaroni

  • Poster of the Forever
  • Senior Member
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #650 on: February 21, 2010, 10:36:55 PM »
Mups - are you ready to start deadlifting yet? I'm thinking maybe yes.

Try removing one day's worth of bench and do a couple sets of 5 deadlifts, just working up to a weight you can manage while still keeping a straight back. I guarantee this will do more for you than the day of bench.
vjj

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #651 on: February 21, 2010, 10:41:41 PM »
Gs: ill move my goal up. Just thats my current. I want to see how fast I can get there.

Cormac: should I start with just the bar?  That's how I started with squat.

Cormacaroni

  • Poster of the Forever
  • Senior Member
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #652 on: February 21, 2010, 10:44:03 PM »
Yeah, although you kind of need something to get it up to the right height. If your gym has any wooden plates, this would be the time to use them. Failing that, just put it on the supports in a squat cage.

Once you do them, you will never need to ask *why* you need to do them.
vjj

Flannel Boy

  • classic millennial sex pickle
  • Icon
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #653 on: February 21, 2010, 10:49:10 PM »
I've gained 15 pounds in the last three weeks.

Woot?

BlueTsunami

  • The Muffin Man
  • Senior Member
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #654 on: February 21, 2010, 10:52:33 PM »
Getting some money my way. Putting $100 of it into footwear. I'm thinking of either getting a pair of Nike Free's or Vibram Five Fingers. If neither of those, some traditional running sneakers. I think I'm really going to hit some crossfit regimen and stick with it (instead of purely running). The Vibrams look very interesting in that regard.
:9

Cormacaroni

  • Poster of the Forever
  • Senior Member
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #655 on: February 21, 2010, 10:57:48 PM »
Getting some money my way. Putting $100 of it into footwear. I'm thinking of either getting a pair of Nike Free's or Vibram Five Fingers. If neither of those, some traditional running sneakers. I think I'm really going to hit some crossfit regimen and stick with it (instead of purely running). The Vibrams look very interesting in that regard.

Not many Crossfitters actually do their workouts in Vibrams, I think. Many people wear them for running or recreational sports/outdoor stuff but there's no real benefit to wearing them indoors while lifting weights or doing sit-ups or whatever.  I have 4 different kinds of footwear at my desk at work that I can take to the gym depending on what I'm doing, but to be honest, for most stuff you can just go barefoot if your gym will let you.
vjj

duckman2000

  • A lot of shit pisses me off
  • Senior Member
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #656 on: February 21, 2010, 10:59:38 PM »
I think you can safely throw a few plates on the bar for the first deadlifts, seems like it would be almost too light to get started with just the bar. Whatever works, though.

Cormac, how do those vibram things work anyway? The toes are individual, I get that, but it seems like a real tight mold would limit it to a very narrow foot and toe shape. Is the material very flexible? I'd imagine those would be great if I picked up free running again.
« Last Edit: February 21, 2010, 11:01:42 PM by duckman2000 »

BlueTsunami

  • The Muffin Man
  • Senior Member
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #657 on: February 21, 2010, 11:02:42 PM »
Getting some money my way. Putting $100 of it into footwear. I'm thinking of either getting a pair of Nike Free's or Vibram Five Fingers. If neither of those, some traditional running sneakers. I think I'm really going to hit some crossfit regimen and stick with it (instead of purely running). The Vibrams look very interesting in that regard.

Not many Crossfitters actually do their workouts in Vibrams, I think. Many people wear them for running or recreational sports/outdoor stuff but there's no real benefit to wearing them indoors while lifting weights or doing sit-ups or whatever.  I have 4 different kinds of footwear at my desk at work that I can take to the gym depending on what I'm doing, but to be honest, for most stuff you can just go barefoot if your gym will let you.

Yeah, I can see them not adding anything to stationary workouts in the gym. I do have one thing in mind though and it involves mainly running stairs and mixing in calisthenics and other days doing burpees. I would like to use the Nike Free for this but I've been told that they don't really hold up well to lots of lateral movement (will jack the seaming up since they're good for only forward motion).

Cormac, how do those vibram things work anyway? The toes are individual, I get that, but it seems like a real tight mold would limit it to a very narrow foot and toe shape. Is the material very flexible? I'd imagine those would be great if I picked up free running again.

Cormac could probably give a better opinion on them but from what I've read and seen, they look to allow near barefooted movement (along with the benefits and dangers). They mainly just protect the soles of your feet with tough flexible material.
« Last Edit: February 21, 2010, 11:04:17 PM by BlueTsunami »
:9

duckman2000

  • A lot of shit pisses me off
  • Senior Member
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #658 on: February 21, 2010, 11:11:39 PM »
It just occurred to me that I've only been doing deads for like 6 months. I guess people weren't so full of shit when they said that the weight, and the strength to pull it off, would increase rapidly.

brawndolicious

  • Nylonhilist
  • Senior Member
Re: FitnessBore - 2010 edition
« Reply #659 on: February 21, 2010, 11:35:25 PM »
I only ask because some cat in the GAF fitness thread was talking about counting calories, and he was saying stuff like, for the week he'd be at 2,000 a day if you offset what he ate with what he burned off doing cardio, and I was like bro, you are eating in excess of your maintenance level by like... hundreds of calories.

Anyway you should eat more than 1500 calories a day and also eat more fat.
The average person would need a little under 2,000 Calories a day just to satisfy their basal metabolic rate, or else their body would not be getting enough energy to do basic processes and would start storing fat.  If the guy is actually doing an hour a day or something on an elliptical machine, then he would actually need probably around 3,000 calories to stay fit.  In fact, if he burns around 2,000 Calories  (which is only really only a threat during marathons) then he would get to "the wall" where his body has no more glycogen left and if he has enough endurance/training, then his body would start burning the fat directly.

But it's safe to say that you should eat more than 2,000 calories on days that you do a decent amount of cardio.