Author Topic: STAR CITIZEN: JEU PRÉFÉRÉ DE VOMKRIEGE (Read 316496 times)

Raist · « **Reply #1500 on:** January 10, 2018, 04:15:38 PM »

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2018-01-09-star-citizen-alpha-3-impressions

benjipwns · « **Reply #1501 on:** January 10, 2018, 11:34:30 PM »

Quote

You can buy fancy-looking guns, you can even buy a great big railgun, which charges up and then very satisfyingly unloads, but there's nothing to kill.

these fucking pretentious game "journalists"

benjipwns · « **Reply #1502 on:** January 10, 2018, 11:37:50 PM »

Quote

One [mission], for instance, is an off-the-books private investigation which, admirably, can go either way depending on the evidence you find. You are to search an eerily quiet, abandoned comms station to get to the truth. It sounds OK, doesn't it? But there's no excitement, just a few computer terminals and panels to interact with. No threat, no danger, just a mission to solve an insurance claim of all things. Then it bugged and I couldn't complete it as intended.

This should have been the entire article.

benjipwns · « **Reply #1503 on:** January 10, 2018, 11:42:13 PM »

Quote

Concrete
20 hours ago
I think the key word here is "Alpha".

For comparison heres what the Doom Alpha looked like:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6YTBTSsrqU

Its not a game yet, its a tech demo, they are hitting the hardest engine tasks like physics, rendering and scale-able infrastructure first as those will exert the most restrictions on the final games design.

If you are building a massive building you make sure the foundations are damned solid, otherwise the whole lot will come crashing down at some point. This is basic engineering, it isn't sexy but it is responsible and essential and applies as much to games as any other engineering project.

I'm not a backer, but I do live opposite the Sagrada Familia and thats been under construction for 100 years but its going to be fucking epic when its finished. Maybe this will be the same.

I know games journalists need to incite a mob these days to pay the bills, but please at least TRY and research how games development actually works.

Quote

Concrete
19 hours ago
Lots of points raised, but one thing that needs to be mentioned (and indeed has been mentioned in the case of the Doom example) is scale.

This is a game on an unprecedented scale and as such the required foundations will be so much larger than a conventional project. Its to be expected that visible process will take longer unfortunately. There are also inefficiencies due to the scale of the management required for a project attempting to shift the goal posts but I don't think its enough to sink it.

Sure its taking time, but my finely tuned "this project is imploding" sensors haven't been triggered yet.

Quote

Wyrm
19 hours ago
Alpha is Alpha in the end, doesn't matter what version number you call it. I know they're selling it, but if you're dipping into something like this, you're savvy enough to know what you're getting, 6 year old Johnny isn't getting his bewildered mum to pay for it. I backed it, I'll wait and play it when it's done.

Quote

Zanthorn
19 hours ago

By all means, list how long it would take any of you to

1) Build the studios from which your employees work.
2) Hire, the employees to rework the game engine to fit your needs.
3) Actively building game assets at the same time.
4) R&Ding, iterations of new tech as you get the programmers/software engineers hired to do the iterations.
5) Software engineer all of your studios custom tools for automating your build speed.
6) Build servers so your backers can PLAY TEST released iterations.
7) Produce multiple video blogs every week,from the request of the backers to show progress.

"Gamers" these days, pathetic and disgusting.

Sho Nuff · « **Reply #1504 on:** January 11, 2018, 02:54:32 AM »

I hate the internet

benjipwns · « **Reply #1505 on:** January 11, 2018, 03:14:18 AM »

I love the internet

zomgee · « **Reply #1506 on:** January 11, 2018, 06:25:34 PM »

"Gamers" these days

Joe Molotov · « **Reply #1507 on:** January 12, 2018, 08:45:48 AM »

Us "gamers"

bluemax · « **Reply #1508 on:** January 16, 2018, 12:31:02 AM »

I saw a real live CIG employee at the monthly drinking event last week.

He was arguing with a friend about which of them was younger, he was 24.

bluemax · « **Reply #1509 on:** January 17, 2018, 11:43:32 PM »

As thanks for spending so much on our non functioning game, we are giving you the exclusive right to spend more money on it!

Raist · « **Reply #1510 on:** January 18, 2018, 08:28:05 AM »

$24 for that shitty mouse pad

Joe Molotov · « **Reply #1511 on:** January 18, 2018, 01:24:43 PM »

It is cute how they're LARPing as a real company, though.

Corporal · « **Reply #1512 on:** January 18, 2018, 06:47:21 PM »

What kind of chicken scratch is that signature, though. Who'd ever take them for real with that swirly loopy thing under the letter.

VomKriege · « **Reply #1513 on:** January 20, 2018, 05:22:43 AM »

Why the people behind crowdfunded Camelot Unchained won't sell spaceships or castles

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2018-01-19-why-the-people-behind-crowdfunded-camelot-unchained-wont-sell-spaceships-or-castles

Oh wow Eurogamer, FUD much ? Don't you understand anything about game development ?

Crytek hits back at CIG’s request to dismiss Star Citizen legal case

https://www.pcinvasion.com/crytek-hits-back-star-citizen-legal-case

Also it seems now fairly certain Turbulent is a contractor to the game (and not just the web platform or whatev) :

https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3800238&pagenumber=3537&perpage=40#post480460804
https://www.espresso-jobs.com/en/jobs/turbulent-media-lumberyardcryengine-capture-artist-6-months/

(Somehow appears in French for me, but a Turbulent job posting for a cinematic specialist on Lumberyard/Cryengine to work on Star Citizen).

Raist · « **Reply #1514 on:** January 20, 2018, 10:52:15 AM »

Didn't know they had implemented alien races already.

Great Rumbler · « **Reply #1515 on:** January 20, 2018, 12:26:22 PM »

More terrifying than anything in Aliens: Colonial Marines.

VomKriege · « **Reply #1516 on:** January 20, 2018, 06:38:32 PM »

https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3800238&pagenumber=3547&perpage=40#post480488923

VomKriege · « **Reply #1517 on:** January 20, 2018, 06:41:53 PM »

"CR's signature and handwriting for the Crytek GLA is absolutely exquisite"

https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/7rpl8w/crs_signature_and_handwriting_for_the_crytek_gla/

benjipwns · « **Reply #1518 on:** January 21, 2018, 02:15:24 AM »

benjipwns · « **Reply #1519 on:** January 21, 2018, 02:20:14 AM »

To be fair, I don't even know why I bother to try and make my signature resemble what it's supposed to say whenever I sign on an screen, it's already becoming bad enough on paper I should just give up on screens. Especially when the styluses are fatter than crayons I used as a kid.

Also, it reminds me of that old thing on the internet where the guy was signing different things ("THIS CARD WAS STOLEN", drawing pictures, etc.) for credit card swipes to see if anything would ever happen.

benjipwns · « **Reply #1520 on:** January 21, 2018, 02:30:28 AM »

huzzah
https://web.archive.org/web/20080912161627/http://www.zug.com:80/pranks/credit_card/index3.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20080912161648/http://www.zug.com:80/pranks/credit_card/index5.html

spoiler (click to show/hide)

Quote

I logged onto the Circuit City Web site to find out which models they had in stock. Then I put on a suit, because you can get away with anything if you're wearing a suit. Suits lie.

Again, I confidently strode into Circuit City, this time armed with actual model numbers. The middle-aged Indian fellow manning the TV department had thick black hair sprouting from his ears, but that didn't block the sound of cash registers ringing in his head. "The Hitachi 42-inch Plasma HDTV?" he repeated. "Yes, we have those in stock!" Little dollar signs appeared in his pupils, since Circuit City employees (unlike Best Buy workers) are paid on commission.

"The 42HDT51?" I asked, fiddling with my cufflinks. I had model numbers and a suit. I could have made sausage out of baby meat and gotten away with it.

"Yes, sir!" said the Indian clerk, punching on his computer. "We have, ah, three in stock."

"I'd like all of them," I said without hesitation.

The guy almost crapped his pants. "Do you have a truck to carry them home?" he asked.

"Yes," I lied. "Yes, I have a truck." (I did have a hand-truck, but it was in my garage.)

"That's great!" said the sales clerk. "Great, just great." He punched in my order which, when tallied with all the optional service plans and recommended cables, came to well over $16,000.

....

I had to literally try the signature four times, while the guy stood breathing over my shoulder. It was excruciating. Finally I settled on "NOT AUTHORIZED," then took a picture of the screen, while trying to carry on a conversation like this was totally normal.

"So, who you rooting for in the big game?" I asked nonchalantly, as I snapped another picture of the screen.

"Oh, ha," he laughed nervously. "Ah ... what are you doing, sir?" he asked.

"What?" I asked him, which is always a safe response when challenged.

"Why did you sign NOT AUTHORIZED?"

"Hmm?" I asked. "What?"

"Let me call a manager," he said, voiding out the transaction. When he turned around, I took a picture of his computer, which seemed equally confused.

The manager, a guy about my age with a ponytail and a goatee, came over to see what was wrong. They exchanged some hushed words, and then he rang through my purchase again. "Can you sign the screen, please?" he asked. This guy was serious.

Again I signed NOT AUTHORIZED to my $16,800 Circuit City credit card payment.

"What is that?" he asked.

"That's my signature," I said.

"You can't sign it NOT AUTHORIZED."

"Why not?"

"Because you need to sign your name."

"Well, I recently changed my signature," I said hopefully. "It now looks a lot like NOT AUTHORIZED."

"It's got to match the back of your card," the manager said.

"Oh," I said. "No problem." I took the card back from him and wrote NOT AUTHORIZED on the back of my credit card. I had heard that this trick sometimes works, but this guy was too smart for me.

"No, no," he said as I started writing. "That doesn't count."

"It's never had to match before," I said. "No one has ever cared."

"Well, I'm sorry if we've overlooked the signature in the past," he said. "But we can't accept this. Do you want to try again?"

"You mean try to forge the signature so it matches the back of the card?" I asked.

"Can't you just sign your real name?" the Indian clerk pleaded, watching his commission slip away. "We can let you try again."

"Guess what?" I said, changing course. "This is the first time anyone has verified my signature in years. I want to congratulate you guys. You have really made me feel good about Circuit City credit card services." I hit CANCEL on the signature screen. "Thanks!" I said, waving goodbye as I walked out of the Circuit City without buying anything.

So: there you go. Apparently you can get them to check your signature, but only if you're buying three high-end HDTVs.

[close]

https://web.archive.org/web/20080923232206/http://www.zug.com:80/pranks/credit/
https://web.archive.org/web/20080919003605/http://www.zug.com/pranks/credit_card/

VomKriege · « **Reply #1521 on:** January 21, 2018, 11:31:47 AM »

https://nofrag.com/2018/01/21/106587/

The illustration choice

Tasty · « **Reply #1522 on:** January 21, 2018, 12:24:59 PM »

Lol did he forget what month it is?

spoiler (click to show/hide)

Yes I know it's the backwards Euro date format, shut up.

[close]

Raist · « **Reply #1523 on:** January 21, 2018, 01:01:04 PM »

Quote from: Tasty Meat on January 21, 2018, 12:24:59 PM

backwards Euro date format

Tasty · « **Reply #1524 on:** January 21, 2018, 01:49:37 PM »

Rufus · « **Reply #1525 on:** January 21, 2018, 04:47:33 PM »

You're a programmer, aren't your kind supposed to rep for YYYY-MM-DD?

Tasty · « **Reply #1526 on:** January 21, 2018, 05:01:37 PM »

Quote from: Rufus on January 21, 2018, 04:47:33 PM

You're a programmer, aren't your kind supposed to rep for YYYY-MM-DD?

Sure. Month is in front of the day, checks out.

VomKriege · « **Reply #1527 on:** January 23, 2018, 06:04:17 AM »

Tasty · « **Reply #1528 on:** January 23, 2018, 06:15:16 PM »

Problem is the supporters aren't even being duped. They're getting exactly what they think they want.

VomKriege · « **Reply #1529 on:** January 26, 2018, 08:23:35 AM »

https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/7t3dz9/no_booth_or_presentation_at_gamescom_this_year/?ref=share&ref_source=link

Quote

Some team members will be visiting Gamescom in Cologne, from August 22 – 25. We will arrange a variety of activities and opportunities to meet up during the week, including our traditional developer Biergarten gathering. We will not have a booth or presentation at Gamescom this year, allowing us to focus on our quarterly release schedule and CitizenCon.

VomKriege · « **Reply #1530 on:** January 26, 2018, 08:28:50 AM »

Also it seems the following change has been made to the Terms of Service :

https://robertsspaceindustries.com/tos

EDIT - There's also a new level in the balæna cursus honorum : Legatus Navium. Rumored to be for those who spend over 25k$ on Star Citizen...

spoiler (click to show/hide)

[close]

VomKriege · « **Reply #1531 on:** January 27, 2018, 12:12:29 PM »

More legal hot swashbuckling :
https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/7tccxu/cig_responds_to_cryteks_response_to_the_mtd/

And the yearly reminder that they'll totally get to VR soon :
https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3800238&userid=0&perpage=40&pagenumber=3602#post480712186

Quote

Reverse The Verse Jan 26 2018
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/222623015?t=32m11s

@32:11

Chris Roberts:
YEAH on the VR FRONT, um, you know, the game's very much built to be VR FRIENDLY because, you know... like al-um... almost all the UI is DIAGETIC and the stuff that isn't we're putting more into being DIAGETIC and we wanna improve the whole DIAGETIC FEEL... ah... so... ahh... you know... our biggest HOLDBACK on the VR is really just we're still doing so much base level REFACTORING and the ENGINE and the RENDERER will, you know, be starting on you know, the X... the VULKAN, the X12 kinda REFACTOR as well, a-and we're doing so much OPTIMISATION that we sorta feel like, 'we've gotta get that done... FIRST', and... get the base level engine stuff more like FINISHED, not constantly working REFACTORING

And then we'll... we'll PUT VR...

Cos we had actual, you know, VR support quite a while ago but again as we CHANGE stuff it BREAKS and then your engine team, you go, 'are they gonna go fix the VR stuff? Are they writing that new... that new... you know like the PROCEDURAL PLANETS that EVERYBODY can experience', and... so that's always been... that's kind of what's happened in those situations

But once all that stabilises of course we're gonna go and get that supported and when we're building things, you know, we're aware of like I said the DI... putting everything in the world itself, ah... which is quite friendly for VR or... you know... and moving your head around and TRACKING the same thing it's like... we track... ah... your HEADLOOK and actually, you know, I... I'd thought that we'd turned it on in 3.0 but it will be something that you can disconnect your LOOK from your AIM... as a PLAYER... ah, you know the AI can already do that...

Cos that's also something that's potentially useful where you're... you know... you're a CERTAIN way, you don't have to look around to like move your gun to look at it

Raist · « **Reply #1532 on:** January 27, 2018, 03:41:10 PM »

Quote from: VomKriege on January 26, 2018, 08:28:50 AM

Also it seems the following change has been made to the Terms of Service :

(Image removed from quote.)

https://robertsspaceindustries.com/tos

So they changed the ToS to specifically dodge one of the points of the lawsuit?

Oh chrissy chris

VomKriege · « **Reply #1533 on:** January 27, 2018, 08:38:57 PM »

Quote

In October 2017 they announced that a roadmap of SQ42 would be made public to backers in December 2017.
No roadmap was published.
In January 2018 Chris Roberts gives a reason for this - that they are restructuring their JIRA system and moving to AGILE development - but ONLY after the question was raised in a Q&A.

Just want to make sure everyone is following along.

https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3800238&pagenumber=3607#post480723613

See post just above for the transcript.

Raist · « **Reply #1534 on:** January 28, 2018, 04:34:18 AM »

I love how Roberts always sounds like a panicking kid coming up with a very convoluted answer as to why he didn't do his homework.

VomKriege · « **Reply #1535 on:** January 28, 2018, 04:36:43 AM »

https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/7tg30u/psa_stealing_ships_might_no_longer_be_planned/

Edit :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVQAxh8lvpU&t=19m28s

Oh Lord...

Tasty · « **Reply #1536 on:** January 28, 2018, 12:41:25 PM »

Wait female chars aren't playable??? What the fuck.

I'm just... how do you make a multiplayer game single-gender only? I'm gobsmacked.

Even Pokemon added genders in Crystal. Holy shit.

nudemacusers · « **Reply #1537 on:** January 28, 2018, 02:50:56 PM »

No women are playing this game anyway.

Raist · « **Reply #1538 on:** January 28, 2018, 03:08:47 PM »

Quote from: nudemacusers on January 28, 2018, 02:50:56 PM

No women are playing this game anyway.

The kind of folks who backed this game would likely double their investment just to be able to stare at some ass for hours tho.

VomKriege · « **Reply #1539 on:** January 29, 2018, 06:19:10 AM »

Quote from: Tasty Meat on January 28, 2018, 12:41:25 PM

Wait female chars aren't playable??? What the fuck.

I'm just... how do you make a multiplayer game single-gender only? I'm gobsmacked.

Even Pokemon added genders in Crystal. Holy shit.

Well to be fair they've been working on female models for some time. And as pointed by that bowtie guy in the podcast video, they need them for the single player game (and motion captured actresses) since 2014. Why do they need until at least late Q4 2018 to do so is mind-blowing though.

Edit :
http://www.thebore.com/forum/index.php?topic=43642.msg2238586;topicseen#msg2238586

Tasty · « **Reply #1540 on:** January 29, 2018, 10:46:19 AM »

"Making characters in real-time"

VomKriege · « **Reply #1541 on:** February 03, 2018, 08:17:12 AM »

Derek Smurt drama.

https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3800238&userid=0&perpage=40&pagenumber=3666#post480926808

Quote

Derek Smart - The Eternal Victim

I've dealt with people like Dr. Derek throughout my life; the over-promising under-achiever. people like Derek Smart only know how to victimize themselves. The problem is he never wins, and can’t help himself to make enemies.

The joke is always on him though, as the foundation of the something awful forums is to do nothing but simply point and laugh. Derek Smart is the joke, literally. So let's go ahead and give “the warlord” the full warlord treatment.

When I told Derek Smart that I was going to be suing Chris Roberts for Consumer Fraud, the very first thing he did was call me a liar. This perplexed me for two reasons: A) He never had any reason before to believe that I was lying about anything, B) We are technically both on the same side. It just seemed to be a self-destructive act of accusation out of nowhere. So, as any higher-level functioning adult would do, I tried to understand the position he was coming from.

Eventually it came to a point where he wanted to know the docket number for my case. I simply explained to him that docket numbers don't get handed out the moment you have a case filled, and that it takes a week or two for the court secretary to put it into the system. I told him that once I received my docket number, I would go ahead and give it to him for his own perusal.

He continued to berate me and call me a liar for absolutely no reason at all. So in response, I decided to take a photo of my receipt from the court because he tried to continue to argue with me over the semantics of “filing” versus “submitting” court documents. Even after it was told to him by several people in the chat room that he was wrong, he continued to dig in his heels on his position. I eventually decided it was not worth my time to continue arguing with someone over the internet, and simply ended the conversation.

A few weeks past without a word for me at all. in fact, a majority of the time I'm simply a lurker.

I received my docket number after a few weeks and posted the number in a private area specifically designed for that sort of thing. Derek then told me that this was the wrong chat and deleted it; telling me to post it somewhere else. Considering I was invited to the discord and this channel specifically to keep them updated on my progress, this only perplexed me further.

He then posted all of my suit information to his public lobby, which included my docket number, my real name, and my address… To a room of people where the potentiality of a number of people who threatened my well-being resided.

The only reason I can possibly come up with for you to about-face on me, for absolutely no reason what-so-ever, is that someone came along and did what you’ve been fantasizing about doing for literally four years and that upset your seemingly delicate ego. You seem to lack the ability to see outside yourself and to see yourself for the attention seeker you really are. To then project this trait upon me is just absurd. I barely post.

So keep me blocked, you can’t handle this. Like the “666” of this page number, you are nought but an internet demon. You’re the one sinking into obscurity. This is your own personal room, your own opus maximus, and you’ll be laughed at for all eternity for all to see, long after your dust and gone.

You have an extremely fragile ego, and I pity you.
See ya.
rear end in a top hat.

bluemax · « **Reply #1542 on:** February 06, 2018, 08:38:21 PM »

https://twitter.com/dsmart/status/960964749788942347

Pot, Kettle, Black?

VomKriege · « **Reply #1543 on:** February 07, 2018, 09:26:43 AM »

Tasty · « **Reply #1544 on:** February 07, 2018, 01:29:11 PM »

Lol their official Twitter being so petty

VomKriege · « **Reply #1545 on:** February 07, 2018, 02:02:55 PM »

https://gfycat.com/MeaslyUltimateFlycatcher

bluemax · « **Reply #1546 on:** February 08, 2018, 01:56:09 AM »

They launched a rocket for half the cost of Star Citizen.

But you know:

https://twitter.com/RobertsSpaceInd/status/961008962114998272

Sure.

Raist · « **Reply #1547 on:** February 08, 2018, 06:22:49 AM »

Someone ask if it's actually orbiting, or if it ends up crashing into (or likely rather, clipping through) the planet/moon

bluemax · « **Reply #1548 on:** February 22, 2018, 01:21:10 AM »

Trying to help myself fall asleep last night I tuned in to a SC stream (at 1am PST there were under 100 people watching SC on Twitch). The stream I chose feature a guy whose ship had managed to spawn with another ship stuck on top of it. After he and a friend took turns trying to fly around and shake it off, the friend switched to another ship and decided to shoot it off. The friend was typing in chat and saying it looked like the shots were not hitting, but on the streamers stream it was and eventually it did blow up.

The streamer's ship had a ton of fancy monitors and displays in it, but when he went to check a map his character avatar pulled its arm up and a 3d map projected out of its arm.

Someone came in to the chat and asked why this game wasn't more popular. The chat regs gave the usual SC sheep answers, but the streamer admitted that there just wasn't enough content to make the game compelling for most people.

Raist · « **Reply #1549 on:** February 22, 2018, 03:38:22 AM »

Quote from: bluemax on February 22, 2018, 01:21:10 AM

Trying to help myself fall asleep last night I tuned in to a SC stream (at 1am PST there were under 100 people watching SC on Twitch). The stream I chose feature a guy whose ship had managed to spawn with another ship stuck on top of it. After he and a friend took turns trying to fly around and shake it off, the friend switched to another ship and decided to shoot it off. The friend was typing in chat and saying it looked like the shots were not hitting, but on the streamers stream it was and eventually it did blow up.

The streamer's ship had a ton of fancy monitors and displays in it, but when he went to check a map his character avatar pulled its arm up and a 3d map projected out of its arm.

Someone came in to the chat and asked why this game wasn't more popular. The chat regs gave the usual SC sheep answers, but the streamer admitted that there just wasn't enough content to make the game compelling for most people.

No link? Dude.

VomKriege · « **Reply #1550 on:** February 23, 2018, 04:38:24 AM »

VomKriege · « **Reply #1551 on:** February 23, 2018, 04:53:13 AM »

https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3800238&pagenumber=3797&perpage=40#post481560982

at that casting roll

VomKriege · « **Reply #1552 on:** February 28, 2018, 09:41:41 AM »

TODAY IN SPACE LA LAW
Some document for "Discovery Planning" apparently coming from the Crytek suit

https://www.docdroid.net/uMDHWEY/discovery-plan.pdf

benjipwns · « **Reply #1553 on:** February 28, 2018, 10:00:52 AM »

they were ordered to meet to work things out on their own first and this is a summary of that meeting along with some other paperwork filings

main jist is that Crytek basically has no actual demands at this point which could settle it, they want to use discovery to find out exactly what RSI has to give them because they say that there's no information on anything available and they've had to request information multiple times already with no response

RSI's position seems to be that they're totally confused by everything Crytek says, it's all a bunch of wacky conspiracy theory and the court should just dismiss the case and allowing discovery would be just a waste of time anyway and they shouldn't have to provide anything since the case might just get dismissed so why bother them with it

so they both want to go to court

VomKriege · « **Reply #1554 on:** March 08, 2018, 03:13:49 AM »

https://www.reddit.com/r/starcitizen/comments/82q6hi/hypothetically_if_cig_was_to_never_deliver_a/dvcf950/

Quote

I'm not really sure why this hypothetical keeps coming up (And yes it keeps coming up, I've seen many iterations of it over the past few years)

THEY HAVE ALREADY DELIVERED a functional game.

Raist · « **Reply #1555 on:** March 08, 2018, 04:24:11 AM »

Quote

Not really. I can load up the game and play it right now. That is functional. Does it crash? Sure. Is it buggy? Sure. Neither of those things make it non-functional. Non-functional would be... it doesn't even start up.

The lower bar set by Tard Citizens ladies and gents

nudemacusers · « **Reply #1556 on:** March 08, 2018, 02:28:09 PM »

GOAT functional game

Tasty · « **Reply #1557 on:** March 08, 2018, 03:25:41 PM »

I see that and raise you

nudemacusers · « **Reply #1558 on:** March 10, 2018, 11:03:22 PM »

I need more star citizen news. Is this dead yet. Is crytek suing them.

Joe Molotov · « **Reply #1559 on:** March 11, 2018, 09:12:58 PM »

Quote from: nudemacusers on March 10, 2018, 11:03:22 PM

I need more star citizen news. Is this dead yet. Is crytek suing them.

It’s out of beta and GOTY quality.

News:

Author Topic: STAR CITIZEN: JEU PRÉFÉRÉ DE VOMKRIEGE (Read 316496 times)