Oof, another transphobe writer exposed themselves:
I read the first Harry Potter novel and thought it extraordinary. I felt something old and wise, fresh and exciting had been offered humanity. Life with its vicissitudes prevented reading volumes that followed.
I consider J.K. Rowling perfectly within her rights as a human being of obvious caring for humanity to express her views about whatever is of concern to her. As she has done.
I also believe that listening to each other before going for the match would put some distance between us and the Middle Ages.
As an Elder (which I take seriously), I must remind us that there is no “right witch” to burn. Perhaps only our own lack of awareness of being erased, long before robotic AI “females” were foisted upon society’s consciousness, primarily as slaves, workers, and sex toys. By this I mean, for instance, that “woman” for whatever sinister reason was being erased in language well before she/her was being disappeared from dictionaries and society.
The use of “guy” for both male and female eroded the ability of children to easily feel confident in which gender they were. From that confusion, considered irrelevant, apparently, to the forming of young minds, has come much cutting off of parts and restructuring of essential physical equipment. If such restructuring is freely chosen at eighteen or twenty, at least there is a sense the person involved may have lived long enough to know, definitely, what is desired. Younger than that, I feel there may in fact be reason, later on, to mourn and weep. After all, the human body is a miracle, of whatever sex, tampering with a miracle is unlikely to serve us.~aw
But I can see why she supports Joanne:
In 2013, the Anti-Defamation League called anti-person who believes in the development and protection of a Jewish nation essays in Walker's book The Cushion in the Road "replete with fervently anti-Jewish ideas" and said Walker was "unabashedly infected with anti-Semitism".[50][51]
In 2017, Walker published a poem on her blog entitled "It Is Our (Frightful) Duty to Study The Talmud", recommending that the reader should start with YouTube to learn about the allegedly shocking aspects of the Talmud, describing it as "poison". The poem used antisemitic tropes and arguments.[52][53][54] In it, she also "describes her reaction when a Jewish friend", later stated to be her ex-husband, accused her "of appearing to be antisemitic".[55]
In 2018, Walker was asked by an interviewer from The New York Times Book Review "What books are on your nightstand?" She listed Icke's And the Truth Shall Set You Free, a book promoting an antisemitic conspiracy theory which draws on The Protocols of the Elders of Zion and questions the Holocaust. Walker said: "In Icke's books there is the whole of existence, on this planet and several others, to think about. A curious person's dream come true."[56][57] The publication of the interview in the "By the Book" weekly column generated significant criticism of Walker and the New York Times Book Review.[58] The Review was criticized both for publishing the interview at all and for failing to contextualize And the Truth Shall Set You Free as an antisemitic work.[59] Walker defended her admiration for Icke and his book, saying: "I do not believe he is anti-Semitic or anti-Jewish".[60] Walker argued that any "attempt to smear David Icke, and by association, me, is really an effort to dampen the effect of our speaking out in support of the people of Palestine".[61] Following the controversy Roxane Gay argued that "Alice Walker has been anti-Semitic for years". The NYT released a statement that the contents of the interview "do not imply an endorsement by Times editors".[62]
The issue of gender identity is a complex and sensitive topic that requires careful consideration and respect for all perspectives. While it is crucial to acknowledge and address discrimination and mistreatment of transgender individuals, it is also important to recognize that there are differing opinions and perspectives on the matter.
Unfortunately, the current state of the discourse on transgender issues is highly polarized, with the left and right wings of politics both heavily invested in promoting their own views on the matter. As a result, the moderate voices in the debate have been largely drowned out, and the conversation has become increasingly divisive and hostile.
On one hand, it is undeniable that there are those on the right who harbor a deep-seated animosity towards the transgender community, and who seek to deny their very existence. This kind of bigotry is reprehensible and should be unequivocally condemned by all people of conscience.
On the other hand, it is equally important to recognize that the left wing of politics has played a role in exacerbating the situation by weaponizing the right wing's bigotry and lumping all those who hold a more moderate view in with the extremist elements of the right. This tactic serves only to further entrench positions and make any productive dialogue on the issue impossible.
At the heart of the debate are a number of issues that continue to be contested, including the use of public restrooms by transgender individuals, the participation of transgender athletes in gendered sports, and the gender affirmation of young children. While there is certainly no shortage of opinions on these topics, it is important to remember that the debate is far from over and that all perspectives should be given due consideration.
As a moderate myself, I believe that it is essential to keep an open mind and to approach the issue with compassion and understanding for all those involved. Transgender individuals should not be discriminated against or denied their basic rights as human beings, but at the same time, it is important to acknowledge the concerns of those who may be uncomfortable or uncertain about the issue.
The left wing's attempt to shut down the debate and force a single viewpoint on the matter is not only counterproductive but also authoritarian. It is essential that we maintain a space for respectful dialogue and debate on these issues, even as we work to combat discrimination and promote greater understanding and acceptance of transgender individuals.
Moreover, it is important to recognize that the conversation on transgender issues is not just limited to the dominant cultural discourse that has emerged in predominantly white, Western countries. There are many minority religious and non-religious communities that hold differing perspectives on the issue, and these voices deserve to be heard and respected as well.
In conclusion, the transgender debate is far from over, and it is important that we approach the issue with compassion, understanding, and a commitment to respectful dialogue. While there may be no easy answers, we must remain vigilant in the face of bigotry and discrimination, while also being open to the perspectives of those who may hold a more moderate or nuanced view on the matter. It is only through this kind of honest and open conversation that we can hope to achieve a greater understanding of transgender issues and work towards a more just and equitable world for all.
