He's saying that state polls are not kind to Clinton even though we have legitimate proof that Nevada and Florida are appearing as locks for her.
Even if we did, in two states, have "legitimate proof" of anything days before the election is even held, that says nothing about whether state
polls in general are being unkind to Clinton or not.
HuffPo is the only aggregate to consider both Florida and Nevada to be even within shouting distance of "locks" and nobody else considers any of NH, NC, FL, NV, OH, or IA to be a lock for any candidate except DK on NH. (HuffPo is close on NH and PredictWise is close on NV.)
Unless we're going to turn around and agree that 538 has the election projected as a lock for Clinton.