THE BORE

General => The Superdeep Borehole => Topic started by: MrAngryFace on August 17, 2007, 01:31:04 PM

Title: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: MrAngryFace on August 17, 2007, 01:31:04 PM
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20052489/

Quote
London - Smoking one cannabis joint is as harmful to a person’s lungs as having up to five cigarettes, according to research published on Tuesday.

Those who smoked cannabis damaged both the lungs’ small fine airways, used for transporting oxygen, and the large airways, which blocked air flow, the researchers said.

It meant cannabis smokers complained of wheezing, coughing, and chest tightness, the study by experts at the Medical Research Institute of New Zealand found.

I think this has more to do with people who smoke it beyond a 'recreational' capacity. Still, even 1 or 2 = as many as 10 freakin cigarettes yikes.
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Saint Cornelius on August 17, 2007, 01:32:37 PM
We're all going to die sooner or later, I'd rather enjoy my time a bit zooted
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: MrAngryFace on August 17, 2007, 01:34:25 PM
Hey I can't criticize, I drink so much alcohol haha.
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Phoenix Dark on August 17, 2007, 01:36:06 PM
This has been known for some time; I remember my bio teacher once telling me about experimenting with this in class during the 70s lol.

If people want to harm their bodies that's perfectly fine with me - just don't tell me it's harmless. I'm not that stupid.
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Saint Cornelius on August 17, 2007, 01:42:51 PM
If people want to harm their bodies that's perfectly fine with me - just don't tell me it's harmless. I'm not that stupid.


Then you're not so stupid to fall prey to all the hysteria surrounding recreational marijuana usage, right?
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: MrAngryFace on August 17, 2007, 01:45:35 PM
PD: well again, id like to stress that this most likely does not matter to recreational users who do it like once or twice a month.
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Saint Cornelius on August 17, 2007, 01:47:52 PM
I'm pretty healthy for someone who smokes once or twice a day, all things considered.
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: MrAngryFace on August 17, 2007, 01:49:44 PM
there's exceptions to every rule, no doubt. I drink more than most of my friends an dont suffer mind bending hang overs for some reason.
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Phoenix Dark on August 17, 2007, 01:50:21 PM
What do you define as "recreational" usage? According to the study one joint is equal to around 5 cigarettes, so while I don't fall prey to any hysteria how does one deny the harmful effects of this stuff? 5 cigs a month isn't going to kill anyone, but that builds up.

Same with drinking. There's nothing wrong with drinking in moderation. But when you start abusing it, drinking multiple beers each day - you're going to damage your liver. Plain and simple. There's nothing "square" about saying that.
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Saint Cornelius on August 17, 2007, 01:52:12 PM
Well you could be a teetotaler and still get hit by a bus, PD.

Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: MrAngryFace on August 17, 2007, 01:52:42 PM
Id GUESS recreational is a few times a week. I dont smoke so im not sure what they consider recreational. I will say my drinking certainly isnt recreaional. I love booze. I drink scotch, brandy, bourbon, and vodka until I fall asleep some nights. Its awesome. I make up for it by not drinking soda muhaha.

I used to be like you PD, all naive about how to deal with being an adult, but now I know that NOTHING compares to the dimension booze can send you to.
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Phoenix Dark on August 17, 2007, 01:56:53 PM
Id GUESS recreational is a few times a week. I dont smoke so im not sure what they consider recreational. I will say my drinking certainly isnt recreaional. I love booze. I drink scotch, brandy, bourbon, and vodka until I fall asleep some nights. Its awesome. I make up for it by not drinking soda muhaha.

I used to be like you PD, all naive about how to deal with being an adult, but now I know that NOTHING compares to the dimension booze can send you to.

Would it be fair to say you drink enough to suffer from liver damage problems in the future? If so, does the momentary pleasure justify the long term consequence?

Like I said I'm not saying drinking alcohol is bad PERIOD. But is there anyone who'd argue that over doing it has poor consequences for the body's health?


Would you guys agree that smoking cigarettes is a "bad" thing for the body?
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Saint Cornelius on August 17, 2007, 01:59:59 PM
IT DEPENDS ON THE BRAND, PD

STOP BEING ARGUMENTATIVE FOR THE SAKE OF BEING ARGUMENTATIVE
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: MrAngryFace on August 17, 2007, 02:00:44 PM
Breathing the air every morning is bad for you.
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Candyflip on August 17, 2007, 02:02:10 PM
Quote
but cannabis use stopped the lungs working properly.
Quote
“The danger cannabis poses to respiratory health is consistently being overlooked,”

So basically they're saying smoking weed makes you wheeze? Small price to pay. I'd rather be doing that then dying of lung cancer and emphysema.
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Phoenix Dark on August 17, 2007, 02:11:48 PM
IT DEPENDS ON THE BRAND, PD

STOP BEING ARGUMENTATIVE FOR THE SAKE OF BEING ARGUMENTATIVE

I'm not being argumentative, I'm just discussing this issue. But it's not going anywhere so I'll let it be
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Saint Cornelius on August 17, 2007, 02:13:27 PM
You would have to smoke 4 joints a day to equal a single pack of cigarettes, which nobody does.


(http://www.forgotten-gamer.com/forums/style_emoticons/default/whistling.gif)
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Candyflip on August 17, 2007, 02:15:48 PM
You would have to smoke 4 joints a day to equal a single pack of cigarettes, which nobody does.


(http://www.forgotten-gamer.com/forums/style_emoticons/default/whistling.gif)
Yeah =\ sometimes.
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Saint Cornelius on August 17, 2007, 02:19:10 PM
Like Cheech & Chong sized spliffs man.
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Cyanista on August 17, 2007, 02:28:52 PM
Who smokes a joint alone, though?  Unlike cigarettes, a joint is often shared between 2-4 people. 

I don't think it's harmless - I have a really hard time getting over respiratory infections and my hair smells like pot sometimes :(.  Still, I could outrun any of my cigarette smoking friends any day of the week, and many of them haven't been smoking as long as I have.  No one's adding poison to the marijuana cigarettes. 
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Saint Cornelius on August 17, 2007, 02:33:55 PM
While I personally would rather smoke a bong than a joint, my roommates are quite content with rolling a jay or a blunt and smoking it by themselves. Professional stoners!

I won't argue that smoking ganja is harmless, but I'm not going to try to quantify "oh smoking this much pot = smoking this many cigarettes" because that's a hysterical argument to be used when the DARE commercials are losing their effectiveness.
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: ToxicAdam on August 17, 2007, 03:40:46 PM
I wish they'd focus their attention on whether cannibis causes it's long-time users to be paranoid when sober or if paranoid people are more apt to smoke cannibis to self-medicate.

Because the causal link is definitely there in my experiences.



Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Mupepe on August 17, 2007, 03:45:35 PM
I wish they would do some real studies.  I thought everyone already knew this and accepted it?  I mean, the point is, a recreational marijuana user doesn't damage their lungs nearly as much as an average cigarette smoker because quite simply, they don't smoke as much. 

You could smoke a bowl a day and if that equals 5 cigarettes, you're still smoking way less than the average cigarette smoker.
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: abrader on August 17, 2007, 03:52:01 PM
I dont smoke I vaproize.

Smoking is like inhaling a forest fire...

vaporizing is like inhaling a small little bit of steam....

its like fried chicken vs baked chicken.

Sadly some people dont appreciate vaproizing because it doesnt have that horrible lung burn like smoking does. because that feeling isnt there, they feel they arent getting as high - when they really are.
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: abrader on August 17, 2007, 03:53:02 PM
hair smells like pot sometimes :(. 


mmmm iv seen yer pic - id like to run my face thru that.
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Mupepe on August 17, 2007, 03:55:54 PM
I dont smoke I vaproize.

Smoking is like inhaling a forest fire...

vaporizing is like inhaling a small little bit of steam....

its like fried chicken vs baked chicken.

Sadly some people dont appreciate vaproizing because it doesnt have that horrible lung burn like smoking does. because that feeling isnt there, they feel they arent getting as high - when they really are.

vaporizing fucking rocks. 
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Phoenix Dark on August 17, 2007, 03:56:14 PM
hair smells like pot sometimes :(. 


mmmm iv seen yer pic - id like to run my face thru that.


...
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Mupepe on August 17, 2007, 03:58:07 PM
hair smells like pot sometimes :(. 


mmmm iv seen yer pic - id like to run my face thru that.

like her bush?
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: abrader on August 17, 2007, 04:00:00 PM
hair smells like pot sometimes :(. 


mmmm iv seen yer pic - id like to run my face thru that.

like her bush?

LOL - no - youv never liked to touch/play with a girls good smelling hair?

I prefer that other bit trimmed up anyway for the record - there shouldnt be enough hair there to hold a smoke smell.
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Saint Cornelius on August 17, 2007, 04:03:41 PM
...

:wag
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Phoenix Dark on August 17, 2007, 04:04:27 PM
Can someone steer this discussion out of e-sexual harassment territory :-\
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Mupepe on August 17, 2007, 04:04:58 PM
hair smells like pot sometimes :(. 


mmmm iv seen yer pic - id like to run my face thru that.

like her bush?

LOL - no - youv never liked to touch/play with a girls good smelling hair?

I prefer that other bit trimmed up anyway for the record - there shouldnt be enough hair there to hold a smoke smell.

not really.  I'll smell it while we're making out or something.  

and i like a girls bush to be trimmed like a well-kept lawn.
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Mupepe on August 17, 2007, 04:05:45 PM
Can someone steer this discussion out of e-sexual harassment territory :-\
we're not even talking about whats-her-nuts anymore, mr. i-got-a-hug-from-a-brazilian-chick-and-her-hair-smelled-great-lolz.
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Phoenix Dark on August 17, 2007, 04:10:59 PM
Can someone steer this discussion out of e-sexual harassment territory :-\
we're not even talking about whats-her-nuts anymore, mr. i-got-a-hug-from-a-brazilian-chick-and-her-hair-smelled-great-lolz.
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e86/PhoenixDark1/unclepete.jpg)
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Mupepe on August 17, 2007, 04:13:19 PM
:lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol   
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Saint Cornelius on August 17, 2007, 04:13:43 PM
Notice the white hand holding the book.
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: abrader on August 17, 2007, 04:21:50 PM
Can someone steer this discussion out of e-sexual harassment territory :-\

no.
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: BlackMage on August 17, 2007, 04:25:57 PM
WE LANDED ON THE MOON, PEOPLE.

wtf, maf?
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Saint Cornelius on August 17, 2007, 04:39:06 PM
Did BlackMage just spark one? I don't understand ???
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: abrader on August 17, 2007, 04:44:35 PM
Did BlackMage just spark one? I don't understand ???

Maybe he is one of those - "im too professional to partake" mates...

I love those guys - they try to look down on me because I partake - and they try so hard to fly the straight and narrow - you know because only losers "partake"

Then they jump back in their Toyota Corolla and ride off to their 40 hr a week 50-60K /year shyt job.....

People who try to hard and look down on people who partake in the THC blo - and they usually make 8x less $$ even tho they insist their way is the right way.

"I would love to smoke, but they do random drug screening at my job"

Tip 1: if your job is even piss testing you, you are someones buttfukk monkey boy ;)

Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Saint Cornelius on August 17, 2007, 04:46:49 PM
I am someones buttfukk monkey boy, evidently. And not the person whose monkey boy I want to be, either  :'(
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: abrader on August 17, 2007, 04:58:35 PM
I dont smoke I vaproize.

Smoking is like inhaling a forest fire...

vaporizing is like inhaling a small little bit of steam....

its like fried chicken vs baked chicken.

Sadly some people dont appreciate vaproizing because it doesnt have that horrible lung burn like smoking does. because that feeling isnt there, they feel they arent getting as high - when they really are.

vaporizing fucking rocks. 

I use this one...

(http://www.vapir.com/c2/images/One.jpg)

and this one when im on the go

(http://www.vapir.com/c2/images/Oxygen+Battery.jpg)
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Saint Cornelius on August 17, 2007, 05:00:47 PM
Jesus those are some serious apparatuses.
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Mupepe on August 17, 2007, 05:03:34 PM
I have a homemade one.  Ghetto as fuck, but it works.
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Candyflip on August 17, 2007, 05:05:12 PM
Volcano vapes are pretty nice too.

(http://www.icmag.com/gallery/data/500/9985volcano_pic.JPG)
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: abrader on August 17, 2007, 05:08:29 PM
Volcano vapes are pretty nice too.

(http://www.icmag.com/gallery/data/500/9985volcano_pic.JPG)

So I have heard - never got a chance to use one of those.
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: BlackMage on August 17, 2007, 05:51:22 PM
Did BlackMage just spark one? I don't understand ???

Maybe he is one of those - "im too professional to partake" mates...

I love those guys - they try to look down on me because I partake - and they try so hard to fly the straight and narrow - you know because only losers "partake"

Then they jump back in their Toyota Corolla and ride off to their 40 hr a week 50-60K /year shyt job.....

People who try to hard and look down on people who partake in the THC blo - and they usually make 8x less $$ even tho they insist their way is the right way.

"I would love to smoke, but they do random drug screening at my job"

Tip 1: if your job is even piss testing you, you are someones buttfukk monkey boy ;)



huh?
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Saint Cornelius on August 17, 2007, 05:51:54 PM
He's as confusing as you are, just more verbose.
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Phoenix Dark on August 17, 2007, 05:53:28 PM
Clear the thread, Blackmage is about to explode
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: abrader on August 17, 2007, 05:55:42 PM
Did BlackMage just spark one? I don't understand ???

Maybe he is one of those - "im too professional to partake" mates...

I love those guys - they try to look down on me because I partake - and they try so hard to fly the straight and narrow - you know because only losers "partake"

Then they jump back in their Toyota Corolla and ride off to their 40 hr a week 50-60K /year shyt job.....

People who try to hard and look down on people who partake in the THC blo - and they usually make 8x less $$ even tho they insist their way is the right way.

"I would love to smoke, but they do random drug screening at my job"

Tip 1: if your job is even piss testing you, you are someones buttfukk monkey boy ;)



huh?

Oh this isnt directed at you - I have no idea.

You could be one of those mates tho - I have no idea.

Your post left us hanging, so I redirected.

Did I describe you by coincidence?
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: MrAngryFace on August 17, 2007, 06:01:05 PM
I dont mess with weed, booze is my anti drug. Im not gonna hassle people for doing it tho.
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Phoenix Dark on August 17, 2007, 06:04:30 PM
Do you like wine?
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Saint Cornelius on August 17, 2007, 06:05:17 PM
As long as that shit is fortified, my nicca
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: abrader on August 17, 2007, 06:05:56 PM
back OT REAL TALK:

Yeah smoking anything will destroy you.

It reminds me of the MadTV skit where the guys job is to suck exhaust out of a pipe in a wall...his stay at home wife needs him to suck more exhaust so he mcan make more $$ and buy her more porn....

in the skit the guy has a perminant black stain all around his mouth
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Phoenix Dark on August 17, 2007, 06:28:01 PM
[youtube=425,350]4GXb7-efd4M[/youtube]
 :lol
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: bud on August 17, 2007, 06:35:29 PM
i love chris rock the comedian, but he should never do movies again.
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Flannel Boy on August 17, 2007, 07:33:32 PM
I knew a stoner who smoked a pack or more a day and smoked several joints a day as well. Fun guy, too bad he was kicked out of school. Now he makes 6 figures in Alberta and I'm stoned sober and unemployed.
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Madrun Badrun on August 17, 2007, 07:45:18 PM
I knew a stoner who smoked a pack or more a day and smoked several joints a day as well. Fun guy, too bad he was kicked out of school. Now he makes 6 figures in Alberta and I'm stoned sober and unemployed.

STILL!?

 :(

You must interview really bad.
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Mupepe on August 17, 2007, 07:46:53 PM
Or he must not be looking very hard.
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Madrun Badrun on August 17, 2007, 07:47:38 PM
Or he must not be looking very hard.

I do believe he is. 
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: bud on August 17, 2007, 07:47:48 PM
malek says season 3 of the office is awesome  :-\
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Phoenix Dark on August 17, 2007, 07:49:04 PM
Malek always have depressing stories to tell, I'm gonna kill myself :(

Some girl: Aww you should see my cat, it's so cute
Malek: I had a cat once. It escaped the house and got ripped apart by a pit bull
Some girl: ...

Dude: My buddy is gonna have a party at his dad's house, wanna come?
Malek: My buddy used to have a big house. But there was a gas leak and he died in his sleep
Dude: What the hell...

Lady: I just love Bon Jovi. He's my favorite singer
Malek: My favorite singer got shot in the face
Lady: Excuse me?

 :-\
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: bud on August 17, 2007, 07:49:41 PM
 :lol
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Madrun Badrun on August 17, 2007, 07:52:52 PM
I think we need to throw malek an appreciation thread.  I'll bring the cake. 
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Flannel Boy on August 17, 2007, 08:02:54 PM
 :lol  :lol PD


My dog was hit by a car and was also bitten by a dog that was pit-bull mix.  :-\ However he's still kickin'

Though I do indeed interview poorly Mike, very few companies have responded to my resumes (less than 2%). I do have an interview with a company next week. I don't want to jinx it so I won't name them. I'll just give you the initials; IBM.

Oh, wait!

I think we need to throw malek an appreciation thread.  I'll bring the cake. 
Please don't.
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Madrun Badrun on August 17, 2007, 08:04:49 PM
what position in IBM? 

also...would you tape and upload your next interview?  so we can ridicule you?  AND maybe give advice?   :-*
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Flannel Boy on August 17, 2007, 08:07:27 PM
what position in IBM? 
A crappy sales rep job.
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Madrun Badrun on August 17, 2007, 08:09:25 PM
what position in IBM? 
A crappy sales rep job.

My uncle was westren sales rep from Canada for a very long time; he is very rich, but he went to business collage.    :(
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Flannel Boy on August 17, 2007, 08:13:04 PM
A collaga, eh?

The pay isn't that bad (35k+) and it is better than my current salary (0-)
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Madrun Badrun on August 17, 2007, 08:18:55 PM
thats not bad, hope you get it. 
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Mupepe on August 17, 2007, 08:31:17 PM
how are you surviving?
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Flannel Boy on August 17, 2007, 08:33:04 PM
how are you surviving?
Mooching and selling my body.
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Mupepe on August 17, 2007, 08:35:03 PM
sell your body to me.  you look a lot like cajole right?  i need to get my technique down before i get to him
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Flannel Boy on August 17, 2007, 08:42:26 PM
sell your body to me.  you look a lot like cajole right?  i need to get my technique down before i get to him

I don't sell my body to whores. Sorry.

Cajole doesn't really look like me anyhow. If you want a Cajole lookalike call al-Qaida.
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: brawndolicious on August 17, 2007, 08:42:42 PM
I heard that for medicinal marijuana, they recommend you make it into a tea which is supposedly the most efficient way of ingesting it.
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: TVC15 on August 17, 2007, 08:49:00 PM
The health hazards associated with any sort of smoking are a small price to pay for getting to look really fucking cool.
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Mupepe on August 17, 2007, 08:51:15 PM
sell your body to me.  you look a lot like cajole right?  i need to get my technique down before i get to him

I don't sell my body to whores. Sorry.

Cajole doesn't really look like me anyhow. If you want a Cajole lookalike call al-Qaida.
you're rude.
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Flannel Boy on August 17, 2007, 08:52:34 PM
The health hazards associated with any sort of smoking are a small price to pay for getting to look really fucking cool.
When a cigar isn't just a cigar. 

you're rude.
Sorry, whore.
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Mupepe on August 17, 2007, 08:54:34 PM
can we make out (free of charge)?
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: TVC15 on August 17, 2007, 08:55:26 PM
The health hazards associated with any sort of smoking are a small price to pay for getting to look really fucking cool.
When a cigar isn't just a cigar. 

you're rude.
Sorry, whore.

I would like to play Camel darts with the face of that television show-ruining whore in your avatar.
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Flannel Boy on August 17, 2007, 08:58:33 PM
Mupepe, for free you can do anything you want. Money would just spoil it.

White Man, why must you take out your hatred of ham and cheese pitas on Jenna?

Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: TVC15 on August 17, 2007, 09:00:27 PM
I don't take my hate of women out on her.  There are other reasons to dislike her, specifically how that painted Jezebel helped ruin a perfectly fine comedy.
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Saint Cornelius on August 17, 2007, 09:02:09 PM
I know TVC ain't talkin' aboot Jenna Fischer, is he?
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Madrun Badrun on August 17, 2007, 09:04:14 PM
corny, that avatar is amazing. 
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Flannel Boy on August 17, 2007, 09:04:27 PM
I know TVC ain't talkin' aboot Jenna Fischer, is he?
Aboot, eh?

Apparently Washington State gets a different version of the show. And they also seem to get different Beatle's albums.
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: TVC15 on August 17, 2007, 09:05:40 PM
As a man, a walking abortion, I feel it fit to call out these terrible females that not only see that we are lesser than them, but find amusement in further emasculating our already underdeveloped selves.
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Saint Cornelius on August 17, 2007, 09:18:03 PM
Are we talking about Jenna Fischer or what? Otherwise, TVC's latest tirade doesn't interest me.
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Takuan on August 17, 2007, 09:42:46 PM
There's plenty of other poison in cigarettes that isn't in a joint. What substances are they using for comparison?
Title: Re: Weed: Not so harmless?
Post by: Mupepe on August 17, 2007, 09:44:55 PM
testicular cancer