THE BORE

General => The Superdeep Borehole => Topic started by: Howard Alan Treesong on August 23, 2007, 01:42:04 PM

Title: REAL TALK: Programmers are not human beings. (I wish to learn Perl)
Post by: Howard Alan Treesong on August 23, 2007, 01:42:04 PM
Since when is "do a diff" an asset tracking mechanism. Guys.

Anyone know good Perl-learning resources? I need to teach myself to parse my way out of their paper bag.

Is there any other language (Ruby? Python? I got nothing) that's good for string parsing? Perl is what seems most regular expressionfully powerful.
Title: Re: REAL TALK: Programmers are not human beings. (I wish to learn Perl)
Post by: Van Cruncheon on August 23, 2007, 02:52:22 PM
PERL :heart :heart

i would let larry wall cum inside of me. my anus is open source for his installation.

i am a PERL mastar. what do you wish to know? BUY THE CAMEL BOOK NOW NOW NOW.
Title: Re: REAL TALK: Programmers are not human beings. (I wish to learn Perl)
Post by: Howard Alan Treesong on August 23, 2007, 03:05:57 PM
"Camel book"?
Title: Re: REAL TALK: Programmers are not human beings. (I wish to learn Perl)
Post by: TVC15 on August 23, 2007, 03:23:59 PM
The O'Reilly main perl book has a camel on the cover.  The camel is perl's fursona.
(http://a7.vox.com/6a00b8ea0728391bc000c11413cc3f819d-500pi)

The dude that wrote it created perl, too.
Title: Re: REAL TALK: Programmers are not human beings. (I wish to learn Perl)
Post by: Madrun Badrun on August 23, 2007, 03:25:23 PM
fursona  :lol
Title: Re: REAL TALK: Programmers are not human beings. (I wish to learn Perl)
Post by: Howard Alan Treesong on August 23, 2007, 03:27:13 PM
Fursona: Yiff Your True Mind
Title: Re: REAL TALK: Programmers are not human beings. (I wish to learn Perl)
Post by: Fragamemnon on August 23, 2007, 03:40:50 PM
Since when is "do a diff" an asset tracking mechanism. Guys.

Anyone know good Perl-learning resources? I need to teach myself to parse my way out of their paper bag.

Is there any other language (Ruby? Python? I got nothing) that's good for string parsing? Perl is what seems most regular expressionfully powerful.

If you are trying to write a text parser, perl or python would well. My main problem with perl is readability-god help you understand it if you didn't write the perl code you're looking at. Python is a bit more conventional in its syntax.
Title: Re: REAL TALK: Programmers are not human beings. (I wish to learn Perl)
Post by: Howard Alan Treesong on August 23, 2007, 03:56:44 PM
I just talked to a programmer and he was like PYTHON! and gave me the O'Reilly Python Cookbook (fursona: some rabbity meercat thing). So I guess I'm throwing my hat in the Python ring. Sorry, Perl!
Title: Re: REAL TALK: Programmers are not human beings. (I wish to learn Perl)
Post by: Madrun Badrun on August 23, 2007, 04:11:17 PM
why would pythons fursona be a rabbity meercat thing?  shouldn't it be a snake?
Title: Re: REAL TALK: Programmers are not human beings. (I wish to learn Perl)
Post by: Fragamemnon on August 23, 2007, 04:35:54 PM
O'Reilly books have weird animals on them. My owl book, for example,somehow represents regular expressions!  ??? ???
Title: Re: REAL TALK: Programmers are not human beings. (I wish to learn Perl)
Post by: TVC15 on August 23, 2007, 05:17:34 PM
O'Reilly books have weird animals on them. My owl book, for example,somehow represents regular expressions!  ??? ???

I may be misremembering, but don't the books usually offer some explanation for why they picked the animal on the cover?
Title: Re: REAL TALK: Programmers are not human beings. (I wish to learn Perl)
Post by: Robo on August 23, 2007, 05:27:09 PM
The animals change for whatever reason.  The new editions of the Python one does have a snake on it.  And I know I have an old edition of either Oracle or SQL that has an owl and now they have bugs and reptiles and shit.

I have an older version of that Perl book, but I've never really put it into practice.  I have good experiences with other O'Reilly books, though.  Recommended total.
Title: Re: REAL TALK: Programmers are not human beings. (I wish to learn Perl)
Post by: Van Cruncheon on August 23, 2007, 05:28:35 PM
python is for feggits. sorry, patel, had a series of meetings and then lunch and then another meeting; did you still need a perl assist?
Title: Re: REAL TALK: Programmers are not human beings. (I wish to learn Perl)
Post by: Van Cruncheon on August 23, 2007, 05:29:19 PM
O'Reilly books have weird animals on them. My owl book, for example,somehow represents regular expressions!  ??? ???

everyone knows that a bactrian camel supports implicit type casting and conversion!
Title: Re: REAL TALK: Programmers are not human beings. (I wish to learn Perl)
Post by: Howard Alan Treesong on August 23, 2007, 05:35:01 PM
it's too late I've gone over to the python side :-* :-* :-*

(actually a tools programmer has taken pity on me and is gonna give me a perl necklace. imma still learn python tho.)
Title: LOLPERL
Post by: Fragamemnon on August 23, 2007, 05:50:49 PM
~+=/s/+`^&(+~/$

I think that compiles. (not really, but the language really is ridiculous and is obviously designed for smelly superbeard Unix jockeys)
Title: Re: REAL TALK: Programmers are not human beings. (I wish to learn Perl)
Post by: Howard Alan Treesong on August 23, 2007, 05:56:33 PM
(http://www.zone38.net/font/saturno.gif)
Title: Re: REAL TALK: Programmers are not human beings. (I wish to learn Perl)
Post by: Van Cruncheon on August 23, 2007, 07:23:33 PM
~+=/s/+`^&(+~/$

I think that compiles. (not really, but the language really is ridiculous and is obviously designed for smelly superbeard Unix jockeys)

well, it's valid if you have explicit set to off -- for the current local variable ($_), perform an indirect and implicit substitution on the pattern for 1 or more non-whitepsace characters followed by a "`" and a recursion to the character or string referenced by "&(". maybe. the second "~" is throwing me off.
Title: Re: REAL TALK: Programmers are not human beings. (I wish to learn Perl)
Post by: tiesto on August 23, 2007, 07:37:40 PM
You should write it in Brainfuck (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brainfuck)...
Title: Re: REAL TALK: Programmers are not human beings. (I wish to learn Perl)
Post by: brawndolicious on August 24, 2007, 03:25:09 AM
everyone knows that a bactrian camel supports implicit type casting and conversion!
that's a dromedary camel.

yes I know that.  shut up.