THE BORE

General => Video Game Bored => Topic started by: bork on October 03, 2007, 11:34:47 PM

Title: Did Warhawk hold up?
Post by: bork on October 03, 2007, 11:34:47 PM

Warhawk should be out today here in Japan.

Is it still worth a try?  Do you guys even play the game anymore, or has it been tossed aside in favor of games like Halo 3?

Title: Re: Did Warhawk hold up?
Post by: MCD on October 03, 2007, 11:35:44 PM

PS3 has gaems?

Title: Re: Did Warhawk hold up?
Post by: bork on October 03, 2007, 11:41:25 PM

I heard it did.

Now shut the fuck up and go play your Castlevania.

Title: Re: Did Warhawk hold up?
Post by: MCD on October 03, 2007, 11:45:16 PM

 :(

seriously, it looks generic to me.

EDIT: it's still great if you like online only game, though i still think waiting for COD4 or UT3 might be a better choice.

Title: Re: Did Warhawk hold up?
Post by: Mr. Gundam on October 04, 2007, 12:57:02 AM

Warhawk has held up, it's still very awesome.

Title: Re: Did Warhawk hold up?
Post by: MrAngryFace on October 04, 2007, 01:10:03 AM

<---

Title: Re: Did Warhawk hold up?
Post by: TVC15 on October 04, 2007, 02:24:41 AM

It's good, but like Shadowrun, it's doomed to 7.0 territory due to lack of content.  What's there plays well.  Worth it if you can nab it cheap.

Title: Re: Did Warhawk hold up?
Post by: bork on October 04, 2007, 06:32:59 AM

All right, I purchased it...3800 yen, which is about $32 U.S. Download-only here.

I love the way the jets play in this game!  Excellent controls.  I'm satisfied with it, although I think it would make a better $20 title.

Title: Re: Did Warhawk hold up?
Post by: abrader on October 04, 2007, 09:23:29 AM

yes it held up - and wether people wanna hear it or not, its more fun than halo 3 online. It also supports 32 players where Halo3's max seems to be 16.

Title: Re: Did Warhawk hold up?
Post by: MCD on October 04, 2007, 10:42:59 AM

Quote from: abrader on October 04, 2007, 09:23:29 AM

yes it held up - and wether people wanna hear it or not, its more fun than halo 3 online. It also supports 32 players where Halo3's max seems to be 16.

Different type of games man.

Quote from: lyte edge on October 04, 2007, 06:32:59 AM

All right, I purchased it...3800 yen, which is about $32 U.S. Download-only here.

I love the way the jets play in this game!  Excellent controls.  I'm satisfied with it, although I think it would make a better $20 title.

That's what i meant man, at it's current price, it ain't worth it.

still fun though, i bought it for my brother lately and he is enjoying his time.

Title: Re: Did Warhawk hold up?
Post by: bork on October 04, 2007, 09:43:43 PM

Quote from: abrader on October 04, 2007, 09:23:29 AM

yes it held up - and wether people wanna hear it or not, its more fun than halo 3 online. It also supports 32 players where Halo3's max seems to be 16.

No, it's not.  And there's also far, far less people playing online.  But I am enjoying this more than Battlefield 2 on 360.

Title: Re: Did Warhawk hold up?
Post by: abrader on October 04, 2007, 11:57:56 PM

More players in Halo 3 as 2x more xboxes of course...

But while Halo3 is fun, its basically halo2 online.

I like it- but Warhawk is just amazing fun and the 32 player game size really helps.

I wish i could play it right now actually - my ps3 is packed up.

Title: Re: Did Warhawk hold up?
Post by: MrAngryFace on October 05, 2007, 12:07:01 AM

lol ps3. I havent touched mine siiiiince.....Heavenly Sword, and before that .Hack GU2, a PS2 game lololol

Title: Re: Did Warhawk hold up?
Post by: huckleberry on October 05, 2007, 12:53:34 AM

It is a shame they cut the single player from the game.  The multiplayer just isn't worth the investment....it is pretty fun for a while though. Gets boring quickly.

Title: Re: Did Warhawk hold up?
Post by: abrader on October 05, 2007, 01:06:37 AM

It does need map packs - as does shadowrun (another great game crippled by lack of content)