But....but graphics don't matter, gameplay does!
lol I know, honestly, what I hate the most is lack of surround sound and that friend code shit.But....but graphics don't matter, gameplay does!
Zack and Wiki and Ratchet and Clank prove this wrong. Zack and Wiki is a fun, inventive, and new game featuring all new gameplay but terrible visuals (all Wii's fault, Capcom did their job fine). However, I find all my time going to Ratchet and Clank, a mediocre (well, mediocre for me since I have played all of these R&C games) game with eye jizzing graphics. So, Wii supporters are all wrong, as usual. Great graphics do make up for shaky gameplay, and good gameplay does not make up for abysmal visuals.
God smiled on me and I found my original 360 component cables, so Nintendo is off the hook. At least until Mario Galaxy releases and it looks terrible.
God smiled on me and I found my original 360 component cables, so Nintendo is off the hook. At least until Mario Galaxy releases and it looks terrible.
Wrong, it looks like a 360 game!
I was joking you know.
Amir0x said that, not me!
I find whiteman's HD elitism unsexy. I'm losing my boner here :-\
Nintendo should really use this method to hide graphical flaws thanks to their system.
Nintendo should really use this method to hide graphical flaws thanks to their system.
ya. Mario galaxies would work wonderfully with everything prerendered. I can imagine the game play now....
Nintendo should really use this method to hide graphical flaws thanks to their system.
ya. Mario galaxies would work wonderfully with everything prerendered. I can imagine the game play now....
yes, it would hafta be 2D and it would ROCK YOUR YOKEL FACE
ok, I just played Lost Planet for a few hours and have no idea what's going on in the story so do any of you guys want to play online?
I fucking hated Okami.
:lol no. OOT :bow :bow :bow :bow :bowI fucking hated Okami.
best 3d zelda, and i hate you
exactly, it's actually pretty lolworthy but I'm stuck at the part whereok, I just played Lost Planet for a few hours and have no idea what's going on in the story so do any of you guys want to play online?There was a story?
honestly i played it for the graphics and bosses.
with inferior controls?
I find whiteman's HD elitism unsexy. I'm losing my boner here :-\
But....but graphics don't matter, gameplay does!
Zack and Wiki and Ratchet and Clank prove this wrong. Zack and Wiki is a fun, inventive, and new game featuring all new gameplay but terrible visuals (all Wii's fault, Capcom did their job fine). However, I find all my time going to Ratchet and Clank, a mediocre (well, mediocre for me since I have played all of these R&C games) game with eye jizzing graphics. So, Wii supporters are all wrong, as usual. Great graphics do make up for shaky gameplay, and good gameplay does not make up for abysmal visuals.
no, I mean co-op in another game. halo, gears, etc.
I just finished the Forest Temple in Zelda, and waggle is very not welcome here.We told you to get the GC version.
I just finished the Forest Temple in Zelda, and waggle is very not welcome here.We told you to get the GC version.
camera control + no waggle > widescreenI just finished the Forest Temple in Zelda, and waggle is very not welcome here.We told you to get the GC version.
It's not widescreen!
I just finished the Forest Temple in Zelda, and waggle is very not welcome here.We told you to get the GC version.
I find whiteman's HD elitism unsexy. I'm losing my boner here :-\
1080P or GTFO!But....but graphics don't matter, gameplay does!
Zack and Wiki and Ratchet and Clank prove this wrong. Zack and Wiki is a fun, inventive, and new game featuring all new gameplay but terrible visuals (all Wii's fault, Capcom did their job fine). However, I find all my time going to Ratchet and Clank, a mediocre (well, mediocre for me since I have played all of these R&C games) game with eye jizzing graphics. So, Wii supporters are all wrong, as usual. Great graphics do make up for shaky gameplay, and good gameplay does not make up for abysmal visuals.
Got to agree with you completely. I could keep playing R&C for hours even though nothing about the gameplay is particularly interesting. I just can't tear myself away from the pretty visuals. The lack of excitement is partly due to the ridiculously low difficulty. Synbios can probably beat it with 1 foot on the controller.
I was joking you know.
Amir0x said that, not me!
That is why Amirox is gonna get CALIGULA'd.
So would GAF be GAF: Home to the fanboy whores??I find whiteman's HD elitism unsexy. I'm losing my boner here :-\
1080P or GTFO!But....but graphics don't matter, gameplay does!Zack and Wiki and Ratchet and Clank prove this wrong. Zack and Wiki is a fun, inventive, and new game featuring all new gameplay but terrible visuals (all Wii's fault, Capcom did their job fine). However, I find all my time going to Ratchet and Clank, a mediocre (well, mediocre for me since I have played all of these R&C games) game with eye jizzing graphics. So, Wii supporters are all wrong, as usual. Great graphics do make up for shaky gameplay, and good gameplay does not make up for abysmal visuals.
Got to agree with you completely. I could keep playing R&C for hours even though nothing about the gameplay is particularly interesting. I just can't tear myself away from the pretty visuals. The lack of excitement is partly due to the ridiculously low difficulty. Synbios can probably beat it with 1 foot on the controller.
Evilbore: Home to Graphic Whores
Isn't that because Plasma tvs resolution are usually low compared to LCDs?
like 852x480 and 1024x768?
or is it because of the Plasma technology?
i didn't particularly enjoy playing my ps2 on my hdtv, which is why i keep an sdtv handy! wii image quality is barely an increase over that of the ps2, thanks to the cheap output filter, so wii display on a hd screen is YIKES
I find whiteman's HD elitism unsexy. I'm losing my boner here :-\
1080P or GTFO!But....but graphics don't matter, gameplay does!
Zack and Wiki and Ratchet and Clank prove this wrong. Zack and Wiki is a fun, inventive, and new game featuring all new gameplay but terrible visuals (all Wii's fault, Capcom did their job fine). However, I find all my time going to Ratchet and Clank, a mediocre (well, mediocre for me since I have played all of these R&C games) game with eye jizzing graphics. So, Wii supporters are all wrong, as usual. Great graphics do make up for shaky gameplay, and good gameplay does not make up for abysmal visuals.
Got to agree with you completely. I could keep playing R&C for hours even though nothing about the gameplay is particularly interesting. I just can't tear myself away from the pretty visuals. The lack of excitement is partly due to the ridiculously low difficulty. Synbios can probably beat it with 1 foot on the controller.
Evilbore: Home to Graphic Whores
I wanted to buy a new TV (1080p) from :bow Samsung :bow but i decided not to after taking a look at their site.
technology is moving fast, first we were stuck with 5000:1 contrast, then 10000:1 and now 25000:1.
really scary, if i can get a decent deal i will jump in, otherwise, no new tv for me.
I haven't heard good news about SEDs lately. Supposedly, most manufacturers aren't interested in the technology anymore. Have you checked out the Panasonic plasmas? They offer almost the same picture as Pioneers at much lower prices. The only thing that I don't like about Plasmas is the amount of glare. Other than that, Plasmas are superior to LCDs in every way.What do you think of DLPs?