THE BORE

General => The Superdeep Borehole => Topic started by: Himu on November 09, 2007, 06:00:54 PM

Title: HELL EXPLAINED BY CHEMISTRY STUDENT
Post by: Himu on November 09, 2007, 06:00:54 PM
Quote
HELL EXPLAINED BY CHEMISTRY STUDENT

The following is an actual question given on a University of Washington chemistry mid term.

The answer by one student was so "profound" that the professor shared it with colleagues, via the Internet, which is, of course, why we now have the pleasure of enjoying it as well :

Bonus Question: Is Hell exothermic (gives off heat) or endothermic (absorbs heat)?

Most of the students wrote proofs of their beliefs using Boyle's Law (gas cools when it expands and heats when it is compressed) or some variant.

One student, however, wrote the
following:

First, we need to know how the mass of Hell is changing in time. So we need to know the rate at which souls are moving into Hell and the rate at which they are leaving. I think that we can safely assume that once a soul gets to Hell, it will not leave.

Therefore, no souls are leaving. As for how many souls are entering Hell, let's look at the different religions that exist in the world today.

Most of these religions state that if you are not a member of their religion, you will go to Hell. Since there is more than one of these religions and since people do not belong to more than one religion, we can project that all souls go to Hell. With birth and death rates as they are, we can expect the number of souls in Hell to increase exponentially. Now, we look at the rate of change of the volume in Hell because Boyle's Law states that in order for the temperature and pressure in Hell to stay the same, the volume of Hell has to expand proportionately as souls are added.

This gives two possibilities:

1.
If Hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which souls enter Hell, then the temperature and pressure in Hell will increase until all Hell breaks loose .

2.
If Hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase of souls in Hell, then the temperature and pressure will drop until Hell freezes over.

So which is it?

If we accept the postulate given to me by Teresa during my Freshman year that, "It will be a cold day in Hell before I sleep with you," and take into account the fact that I slept with her last night, then number two must be true, and thus I am sure that Hell is exothermic and has already frozen over. The corollary of this theory is that since Hell has frozen over, it follows that it is not accepting any more souls and is therefore, extinct......leaving only Heaven, thereby proving the existence of a divine being which explains why, last night, Teresa kept shouting "Oh my God."

 :lol :lol
Title: Re: HELL EXPLAINED BY CHEMISTRY STUDENT
Post by: TVC15 on November 09, 2007, 06:10:54 PM
Thanks for posting this great email forward, Himu.  Now I will not trust your Gundam opinion.
Title: Re: HELL EXPLAINED BY CHEMISTRY STUDENT
Post by: CajoleJuice on November 09, 2007, 06:17:51 PM
This is really old.
Title: Re: HELL EXPLAINED BY CHEMISTRY STUDENT
Post by: Himu on November 09, 2007, 06:18:46 PM
It is? :(
Title: Re: HELL EXPLAINED BY CHEMISTRY STUDENT
Post by: GilloD on November 09, 2007, 06:24:17 PM
Older than the internet prolly.
Title: Re: HELL EXPLAINED BY CHEMISTRY STUDENT
Post by: Howard Alan Treesong on November 09, 2007, 06:55:29 PM
I think this dates from 1959 and was originally distributed on the back of Neiman Marcus Chocolate Chip Cookie recipes
Title: Re: HELL EXPLAINED BY CHEMISTRY STUDENT
Post by: FlameOfCallandor on November 09, 2007, 07:17:50 PM
This is assuming that souls have a mass. What if souls are a wave?
Title: Re: HELL EXPLAINED BY CHEMISTRY STUDENT
Post by: bluemax on November 09, 2007, 07:44:10 PM
So old.
Title: Re: HELL EXPLAINED BY CHEMISTRY STUDENT
Post by: trh on November 10, 2007, 12:31:15 AM
<lib1790>So which is it? If we accept the postulate given by Ms.Therese Banyan during my freshman year, "That it will be a cold night in hell before I go out with you," and take into account the fact that I still have not succeeded in having a relationship with her, the second case cannot be true. Therefore, hell is exothermic.

http://bash.org/?301963

There are two versions :ninja
Title: Re: HELL EXPLAINED BY CHEMISTRY STUDENT
Post by: recursivelyenumerable on November 10, 2007, 12:40:10 AM
Quote
<lib1790>So which is it? If we accept the postulate given by Ms.Therese Banyan during my freshman year, "That it will be a cold night in hell before I go out with you," and take into account the fact that I still have not succeeded in having a relationship with her, the second case cannot be true. Therefore, hell is exothermic.

the author of the second version commits the common logical fallacy of illicit conversion.