THE BORE

General => The Superdeep Borehole => Topic started by: abrader on February 19, 2008, 09:23:33 PM

Title: abrader does minimal
Post by: abrader on February 19, 2008, 09:23:33 PM

harmonica + sparking godzilla toy + FX and tapes = http://web.mac.com/abrader/Site_2/Minimal.html

Title: Re: abrader does minimal
Post by: Howard Alan Treesong on February 19, 2008, 09:25:14 PM

I read that "abrader does mini anal"

I figured that was like, the taint

Title: Re: abrader does minimal
Post by: Powerslave on February 19, 2008, 09:35:07 PM

abrader does mini mall

Title: Re: abrader does minimal
Post by: Phoenix Dark on February 19, 2008, 09:46:19 PM

abrader does mini mouse?  :o

Title: Re: abrader does minimal
Post by: bagofeyes on February 19, 2008, 10:00:06 PM

abrader does 醜い

Title: Re: abrader does minimal
Post by: Phoenix Dark on February 19, 2008, 10:01:22 PM

abrader does what abradurrr

Title: Re: abrader does minimal
Post by: Powerslave on February 19, 2008, 10:03:07 PM

abradoes what abradont

Title: Re: abrader does minimal
Post by: abrader on February 19, 2008, 10:41:10 PM

this is PERFECT!

spoiler (click to show/hide)

purrrfect

[close]

Title: Re: abrader does minimal
Post by: tiesto on February 20, 2008, 11:03:29 AM

Did you use this plugin?

(http://phs.abstractdynamics.org/i_heart_minimal_vst.gif)

I was thinking of recording the sounds of my sink dripping for a good 11 minutes and add a very light kickdrum and highly compressed hihat over it and then be like "OMG CHECK OUT DIS NEW MNML CHOOOOON!!!!!!!" I'll d/l your track in a bit tho.

Title: Re: abrader does minimal
Post by: Eric P on February 20, 2008, 11:04:35 AM

minimal techno is the most annoying genre to have risen to the forefront in the past 5 years

more annoying even than dubstep

Title: Re: abrader does minimal
Post by: abrader on February 20, 2008, 11:06:36 AM

No I never have used any digital stuff for my recording - im all analog.

ThATS funny that they have software plugins for people who dont grasp analog/tape-machine mastery.

Making music with computers sux

Title: Re: abrader does minimal
Post by: Eric P on February 20, 2008, 11:09:17 AM

Quote from: abrader on February 20, 2008, 11:06:36 AM

Making music with computers sux

veto.  it's just cheaper.

if i could afford real equipment i wouldn't have to use electronic emulations.

but it doesn't suck.

Title: Re: abrader does minimal
Post by: Phoenix Dark on February 20, 2008, 11:12:01 AM

Reminded me of this for some reason

[youtube=425,350]5joRRYNypKM[/youtube]
http://youtube.com/watch?v=5joRRYNypKM&feature=related

Title: Re: abrader does minimal
Post by: Eric P on February 20, 2008, 11:13:36 AM

the first image used in that video looks like an Olympic winner's stand

Title: Re: abrader does minimal
Post by: abrader on February 20, 2008, 11:16:37 AM

fair enough....

but I build alot of my stuff or buy cheap old stuff and fix it. I dont spend too much $$.

I also have over 250 instruments so I had to go scrounge mode to amass such a collection.

I got brass, strings, woods, a ton of drums....misc analog >twang< devices, many drum contact mics for recording all of the acoustic instruments (heh) a few other mics a DAT 4 track and some reel to reel machines and tape splicing equipment.

its basically a big pile of junk!

Title: Re: abrader does minimal
Post by: Eric P on February 20, 2008, 11:20:37 AM

i used to play around with that sort of thing in the 90s, but i didn't understand it enough to really get a good feel for what i was doing, so i retreated from it.

whereas with computers i could instantly set up and sequence and make something which at least sounded somewhat like i wanted from the get go

Title: Re: abrader does minimal
Post by: abrader on February 20, 2008, 11:39:49 AM

its an ancient art.

I had to understudy someone to get the core techniques.