THE BORE
General => Video Game Bored => Topic started by: Borys on May 16, 2008, 05:20:29 AM
-
.
-
Yikes
-
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=11186963&postcount=53
Here they are in the same resolution:
Three weeks ago batch:
(http://i31.tinypic.com/16aa3ur.jpg)
New:
(http://www.jeux-france.com/Webmasters/Images/5987620080515_174504_4_big.jpg)
-
Doesn't the studio have a habit of making games that are sort of fun to play? After 4, Silent Hill has nowhere else to go but up.
-
this studio's games are usually fairly decent
also it doesn't look bad in motion, I've seen videos on Gametrailers
-
so this is the wii version?
-
That wouldn't look half-bad if it were the Wii version.
-
(http://ve3dmedia.ign.com/images/02/85/28562_SilentHill5-04.jpg)
Anyone else remember this scene from Silent hill 1?
back to the boat eh?
-
Man, they are really working the Dreamcast hardware.
-
silent hill sucks
horror games suck
-
Gameplay from two gens ago, graphics from last gen. Long live the PS3!
-
I wish they'd get their act together, I'd like to be excited for this game. :(
silent hill sucks
horror games suck
Get your potty mouth out of here.
-
old:
(http://i25.tinypic.com/sgu49e.jpg)
new:
(http://i31.tinypic.com/16ib0c4.jpg)
-
Well there is *some* advancement.
We're now in 2003 PC graphics era!
Max Payne 2 level :lol
-
that's one serious face.
-
Well there is *some* advancement.
We're now in 2003 PC graphics era!
It's certainly better than that. There is significantly more geometric detail, self shadowing, higher resolution textures, etc. It's more detailed than later PC games as well such as Doom 3, Half-Life 2, FEAR, etc. Only Crysis clearly sports more detailed models.
Still, it should be MORE detailed than Crysis when you consider the small environments. It's not a limitation of the platforms, however, but more an issue with the developer I'd say.
(http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a29/dark1x/16ib0c4.jpg)
(http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a29/dark1x/561633_20031015_screen006.jpg)