THE BORE

General => The Superdeep Borehole => Topic started by: Vizzys on June 09, 2008, 12:55:09 AM

Title: fox films :(
Post by: Vizzys on June 09, 2008, 12:55:09 AM
Quote
YouTube | Broadcast Yourself™
Dear Member:

This is to notify you that we have removed or disabled access to the following material as a result of a third-party notification by Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation claiming that this material is infringing


the best kung pow clip deleted
Title: Re: fox films :(
Post by: MrAngryFace on June 09, 2008, 12:57:53 AM
(http://us.movies1.yimg.com/movies.yahoo.com/images/hv/photo/movie_pix/dreamworks_skg/gladiator/_group_photos/connie_nielsen14.jpg)

Youtube has been a busy little bee.
Title: Re: fox films :(
Post by: Vizzys on June 09, 2008, 01:02:02 AM
(http://us.movies1.yimg.com/movies.yahoo.com/images/hv/photo/movie_pix/dreamworks_skg/gladiator/_group_photos/connie_nielsen14.jpg)

Youtube has been a busy little bee.

(http://xs128.xs.to/xs128/08241/l_a52b84f36716548a10063411552b5f98917.jpg)

ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?

what say you fox films?

Is this not why you are here!
Title: Re: fox films :(
Post by: MrAngryFace on June 09, 2008, 01:03:34 AM
(http://cbae.nmsu.edu/~dboje/teaching/338/images/gladiator_commodus.jpg)
Title: Re: fox films :(
Post by: The Fake Shemp on June 09, 2008, 01:05:27 AM
Why is it popular to hate Gladiator?
Title: Re: fox films :(
Post by: brawndolicious on June 09, 2008, 01:08:56 AM
Why is it popular to hate Gladiator?
it got a few oscars in a pretty shit year for oscars.  so you associate that shit year with the movie.

and Russel Crowe was in it.  he throws phones at people.
Title: Re: fox films :(
Post by: Candyflip on June 09, 2008, 01:10:16 AM
Fightin 'round the world
Title: Re: fox films :(
Post by: The Fake Shemp on June 09, 2008, 01:11:31 AM
So it won an Oscar, there's a dumb Internet backlash?  That's distinguished mentally-challenged - the movie still rocked.
Title: Re: fox films :(
Post by: demi on June 09, 2008, 01:12:33 AM
Do they disable your account if you get some content yanked from you?
Title: Re: fox films :(
Post by: EvilBoris on June 09, 2008, 01:13:43 AM
 wtf crowe has stronger presence than all the other posers who tried to tackle the genre following.

 edit: oh real life crowe you mean.
Title: Re: fox films :(
Post by: Vizzys on June 09, 2008, 01:17:45 AM
Do they disable your account if you get some content yanked from you?

Quote
Please Note: Repeat incidents of copyright infringement will result in the deletion of your account and all videos uploaded to that account. In order to prevent this from happening, please delete any videos to which you do not own the rights, and refrain from uploading additional videos that infringe on the copyrights of others. For more information about YouTube's copyright policy, please read the Copyright Tips guide.

ive gotten two videos pulled so far and a have a few more that might be bitched about I guess

Ill just make a new account if so
Title: Re: fox films :(
Post by: Phoenix Dark on June 09, 2008, 01:17:55 AM
I'm ashamed to admit I've never seen Gladiator unedited - I've seen it many times on TNT lol. It's a pretty damn badass movie to me. Not the greatest thing ever but it's fucking gladiators and Rome. How can you possibly go wrong?
Title: Re: fox films :(
Post by: Vizzys on June 09, 2008, 01:21:18 AM
I'm ashamed to admit I've never seen Gladiator unedited - I've seen it many times on TNT lol. It's a pretty damn badass movie to me. Not the greatest thing ever but it's fucking gladiators and Rome. How can you possibly go wrong?

I think willco is fighting invisible internet demons, I see no gladiator hate here
Title: Re: fox films :(
Post by: Phoenix Dark on June 09, 2008, 01:23:56 AM
don't hardcore Ridley Scott fans/film fegs consider it to be very overrated or something?
Title: Re: fox films :(
Post by: The Fake Shemp on June 09, 2008, 01:27:26 AM
I think willco is fighting invisible internet demons, I see no gladiator hate here

I'm saying in general.  Go hit up NeoGAF or the AICN talkbacks or what have you.  Within the past several years, it's been very cool to hate on Gladiator.  I read some discussion lately that Gladiator proves Ridley Scott has no skills anymore.  What the hell?  Gladiator rocked.  I mean, if there's a recent Scott film to hate, it should be American Gangster.
Title: Re: fox films :(
Post by: MrAngryFace on June 09, 2008, 01:29:23 AM
I loved Gladiator for what it was. I just like quoting Commodus
Title: Re: fox films :(
Post by: brawndolicious on June 09, 2008, 01:48:56 AM
I think willco is fighting invisible internet demons, I see no gladiator hate here

I'm saying in general.  Go hit up NeoGAF or the AICN talkbacks or what have you.  Within the past several years, it's been very cool to hate on Gladiator.  I read some discussion lately that Gladiator proves Ridley Scott has no skills anymore.  What the hell?  Gladiator rocked.  I mean, if there's a recent Scott film to hate, it should be American Gangster.
well when one person on the internet wants to act cool and be the first to insult a movie, another person copies them.  and then it snowballs and you end up with Ridley Scott being called a hack.  normal internets bitching.
Title: Re: fox films :(
Post by: Raban on June 09, 2008, 02:00:10 AM
Gladiator is easily one of the most authentic period films I've ever seen.
Title: Re: fox films :(
Post by: AdmiralViscen on June 09, 2008, 02:36:48 AM
Gladiator is easily one of the most authentic period films I've ever seen.

(http://cbae.nmsu.edu/~dboje/teaching/338/images/gladiator_commodus.jpg)
Title: Re: fox films :(
Post by: MrAngryFace on June 09, 2008, 02:37:29 AM
lol
Title: Re: fox films :(
Post by: Eric P on June 09, 2008, 07:40:16 AM
oh did someone request a gladiator hater?

film was lame.

it wasn't even cleopatra, much less quo vadis.

Title: Re: fox films :(
Post by: CajoleJuice on June 09, 2008, 09:31:43 AM
Gladiator pretty much dominated my teenaged years. Seeing it in theaters right in the middle of puberty was fucking awesome.
Title: Re: fox films :(
Post by: Tauntaun on June 09, 2008, 10:01:01 AM
Quote
YouTube | Broadcast Yourself™
Dear Member:

This is to notify you that we have removed or disabled access to the following material as a result of a third-party notification by Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation claiming that this material is infringing


the best kung pow clip deleted

 :'(
Title: Re: fox films :(
Post by: Raban on June 09, 2008, 10:06:02 AM
Gladiator is easily one of the most authentic period films I've ever seen.

(http://cbae.nmsu.edu/~dboje/teaching/338/images/gladiator_commodus.jpg)

Oh you, you're so endlessly witty! You posted an image from a movie I was praising to insult me! That's wit money just CANNOT buy! :spin
Title: Re: fox films :(
Post by: bork on June 09, 2008, 10:33:32 AM

the best kung pow clip deleted

This is a fucking travesty.  Let us mourn.   :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'(

Stuff is still up though:

[youtube=425,350]MQcDZsxv8R0[/youtube]
Title: Re: fox films :(
Post by: AdmiralViscen on June 09, 2008, 10:36:48 AM
Gladiator is easily one of the most authentic period films I've ever seen.

(http://cbae.nmsu.edu/~dboje/teaching/338/images/gladiator_commodus.jpg)

Oh you, you're so endlessly witty! You posted an image from a movie I was praising to insult me! That's wit money just CANNOT buy! :spin

That was an insult? ???

I thought it was funny that you were praising its historical accuracy when right on the same page someone had already posted that image, which is an historical inaccuracy. Unless you didn't know that was inaccurate and thought I was giving your post a thumbs down.

MAF got it.


Although maybe you were talking about the production values and not the nuts and bolts, since pretty much all the characters either didn't exist or existed in a very different way than presented in the movie.
Title: Re: fox films :(
Post by: bork on June 09, 2008, 10:40:03 AM
[youtube=425,350]kGCaCB8ebTc[/youtube]

Good editing.
Title: Re: fox films :(
Post by: Tauntaun on June 09, 2008, 10:45:13 AM
WEEEOOOOPEEEEOOOOWEEEEEOOOOOOPEEEEOOOO!
Title: Re: fox films :(
Post by: MrAngryFace on June 09, 2008, 10:56:12 AM
If you want something close to accuracy, watch both seasons of ROME. Thats fun stuff.
Title: Re: fox films :(
Post by: Tauntaun on June 09, 2008, 11:03:19 AM
I hear that 300 was based on actual events that actually happened.
Title: Re: fox films :(
Post by: MrAngryFace on June 09, 2008, 11:05:21 AM
I hear that 300 was based on actual events that actually happened.

Yeah, the Musical Goatman wrote the first-hand account.
Title: Re: fox films :(
Post by: Tauntaun on June 09, 2008, 11:12:00 AM
I hear that 300 was based on actual events that actually happened.

Yeah, the Musical Goatman wrote the first-hand account.

The best thing I ever heard about a period film was while I was over at my wife's best friend's house and we were watching Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon.  This best friend's dad was watching the film with us while the girls were getting ready and during a scene where they're flying and fighting in the trees he says "You know they used to be able to do that stuff but it was because they were possessed by demons."  I think I was too much in shock to laugh because he was totally serious.  He's a nice dude but he's completely  :dur
Title: Re: fox films :(
Post by: Phoenix Dark on June 09, 2008, 11:13:57 AM
Gladiator is one of the most historically inaccurate films of all time actually. Commodus was not a sniveling bitch who killed his father and died at the hands of a gladiator. A wrestler killed him in his bath  :supergay
Title: Re: fox films :(
Post by: MrAngryFace on June 09, 2008, 11:23:26 AM
I hear that 300 was based on actual events that actually happened.

Yeah, the Musical Goatman wrote the first-hand account.

The best thing I ever heard about a period film was while I was over at my wife's best friend's house and we were watching Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon.  This best friend's dad was watching the film with us while the girls were getting ready and during a scene where they're flying and fighting in the trees he says "You know they used to be able to do that stuff but it was because they were possessed by demons."  I think I was too much in shock to laugh because he was totally serious.  He's a nice dude but he's completely  :dur

DEMONS
Title: Re: fox films :(
Post by: Tauntaun on June 09, 2008, 11:30:15 AM
I have no idea where his head is, every time I've talked to him I wonder what plane of existence his mind is on.
Title: Re: fox films :(
Post by: Raban on June 09, 2008, 06:51:24 PM
That was an insult? ???

I thought it was funny that you were praising its historical accuracy when right on the same page someone had already posted that image, which is an historical inaccuracy. Unless you didn't know that was inaccurate and thought I was giving your post a thumbs down.

I did know. I actually received flak for saying that the whole thumbs-up/down thing was always wrong in movies in my 7th Grade History class and my teacher punished me.

Although maybe you were talking about the production values and not the nuts and bolts, since pretty much all the characters either didn't exist or existed in a very different way than presented in the movie.

The nuts and bolts thing. The way that theme, acting, the general look of the film produced something that felt very real. As opposed to something distinguished mentally-challenged like Troy, where characters are flying through the air doing ninja stabs, and acting so stoic I wanted to throw up. Yeah, sorry I wasn't more detailed.