THE BORE

General => The Superdeep Borehole => Topic started by: The Fake Shemp on August 02, 2008, 02:41:39 PM

Title: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: The Fake Shemp on August 02, 2008, 02:41:39 PM
Friday numbers are in!  So much for all that Titanic talk...

1 THE MUMMY: TOMB OF THE DRAGON EMPEROR $15,322,000

2 THE DARK KNIGHT $12,600,000

3 STEP BROTHERS $5,050,000

4 MAMMA MIA! $3,858,000

5 SWING VOTE $1,950,000

6 JOURNEY TO THE CENTER OF THE EARTH $1,880,000

7 HANCOCK $1,550,000

8 WALL-E $1,305,000

9 THE X-FILES: I WANT TO BELIEVE $1,000,000 :lol

10 SPACE CHIMPS $815,000
 
 
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: John Dunbar on August 02, 2008, 02:46:24 PM

5 SWING VOTE $1,950,000


Fuck you, America.
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Crushed on August 02, 2008, 02:47:28 PM
I am almost seriously entertaining the possibility you and Methodis killed Heath Ledger out of pure Bat-Spite.  :lol
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Phoenix Dark on August 02, 2008, 02:49:10 PM
Titanic: 600mil domestically (more than a billion world wide)

TDK MIGHT get to 500mill domestically...might. There's no fucking way it gets to 600mil
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: The Fake Shemp on August 02, 2008, 02:49:55 PM
Don't take your bitterness out on me because America has decided that The Dark Knight is not nearly as fun and awesome as BRENDAN FRASIER SHOTGUN FLIPPIN' YETIS AND JET LI
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Brehvolution on August 02, 2008, 03:06:21 PM
Considering TDK has been out for a couple weeks, it is more of a 1b than second place.
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Trent Dole on August 02, 2008, 03:42:33 PM

5 SWING VOTE $1,950,000


Fuck you, America.
[youtube=425,350]_VHQS5q6je0[/youtube]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_VHQS5q6je0
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: bud on August 02, 2008, 03:43:27 PM
GO GO GO SPACE CHIMPS!


Next week will be great. My mother and I are going to see Pineapple Express!


it's quite irresponsible of her that she's taking you to see an r-rated movie smh
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: TVC15 on August 02, 2008, 04:20:19 PM
Don't take your bitterness out on me because America has decided that The Dark Knight is not nearly as fun and awesome as BRENDAN FRASIER SHOTGUN FLIPPIN' YETIS AND JET LI

MUMMIES!  THEY NEVER PLAY FAIR!
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Joe Molotov on August 02, 2008, 07:35:04 PM
Mummy 3 looks like the worst movie since Pineapple Express. Art house movies like TDK get owned again by tasteless moviegoers.  :(
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Flannel Boy on August 03, 2008, 03:50:30 PM
Quote
Universal's "The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor" wasn't able steal the box office crown away from Warner Bros.' juggernaut "The Dark Knight," which pulled off the near-impossible by dropping only 42% in its third weekend to all but cross the $400 million mark in domestic ticket sales.

The race was close, however. "Dragon Emperor" grossed $42.4 million domestically from 3,760 screens, while "Dark Knight" grossed $43.8 million from 4,266 theaters for a cume of $394.9 million.

willcowned
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: cool breeze on August 03, 2008, 03:51:45 PM
(http://i33.tinypic.com/fjjbqc.jpg)

If you combine both of Brendan Fraiser's movies, he could top it!
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: CajoleJuice on August 03, 2008, 04:31:54 PM
:rofl
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: demi on August 03, 2008, 04:48:36 PM
Poor Willco
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Eel O'Brian on August 03, 2008, 05:07:18 PM
how many other actors or actresses have had two movies in the top ten at the same time (i'm sure there've been one or two others)

that's sort of impressive

regardless of his acting ability, fraser seems to be a pretty sharp guy when it comes to picking roles in money movies
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Eel O'Brian on August 03, 2008, 05:16:21 PM
let's list the brendan fraser movies that were better than dark knight, i'll start us off:

airheads
gods and monsters
blast from the past
bedazzled
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Flannel Boy on August 03, 2008, 05:29:35 PM
Brendan Fraser has been in a lot of bad films.  :-\
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Reb on August 03, 2008, 05:30:15 PM
Those two episodes of Scrubs.
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: cool breeze on August 03, 2008, 05:32:37 PM
COWARDS!!!!!
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: fistfulofmetal on August 03, 2008, 05:33:01 PM
Those two episodes of Scrubs.

Three episodes
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Eel O'Brian on August 03, 2008, 05:33:59 PM
i was going to post that, but they weren't shown in theaters

then again you can download them off bit torrent just like dark night

the decision is made, allowed

brendan fraser scrubs > dark knight
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: CajoleJuice on August 03, 2008, 06:16:50 PM
the scout
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Joe Molotov on August 03, 2008, 06:18:27 PM
TDK just shotgun-flipped Mummy 3.  :bow2   :american America redeemed. :american
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Mr. Gundam on August 03, 2008, 06:30:18 PM
GO GO GO SPACE CHIMPS!


Next week will be great. My mother and I are going to see Pineapple Express!


You're one weird kid.
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Phoenix Dark on August 03, 2008, 06:52:02 PM
willco  :lol
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: TVC15 on August 03, 2008, 06:59:13 PM
Quote
Universal's "The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor" wasn't able steal the box office crown away from Warner Bros.' juggernaut "The Dark Knight," which pulled off the near-impossible by dropping only 42% in its third weekend to all but cross the $400 million mark in domestic ticket sales.

The race was close, however. "Dragon Emperor" grossed $42.4 million domestically from 3,760 screens, while "Dark Knight" grossed $43.8 million from 4,266 theaters for a cume of $394.9 million.

willcowned

Bubububu the Mummy has a higher per-screen average.  The only reason TDK won is because it's in more theatres.
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Flannel Boy on August 03, 2008, 08:01:32 PM
Quote
Universal's "The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor" wasn't able steal the box office crown away from Warner Bros.' juggernaut "The Dark Knight," which pulled off the near-impossible by dropping only 42% in its third weekend to all but cross the $400 million mark in domestic ticket sales.

The race was close, however. "Dragon Emperor" grossed $42.4 million domestically from 3,760 screens, while "Dark Knight" grossed $43.8 million from 4,266 theaters for a cume of $394.9 million.

willcowned

Bubububu the Mummy has a higher per-screen average.  The only reason TDK won is because it's in more theatres.

Bubububu the Mummy is shorter and has more showings per screen.  The only reason TDK didn't win by more is because it's so long.

Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: TVC15 on August 03, 2008, 08:04:25 PM
Quote
Universal's "The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor" wasn't able steal the box office crown away from Warner Bros.' juggernaut "The Dark Knight," which pulled off the near-impossible by dropping only 42% in its third weekend to all but cross the $400 million mark in domestic ticket sales.

The race was close, however. "Dragon Emperor" grossed $42.4 million domestically from 3,760 screens, while "Dark Knight" grossed $43.8 million from 4,266 theaters for a cume of $394.9 million.

willcowned

Bubububu the Mummy has a higher per-screen average.  The only reason TDK won is because it's in more theatres.

Bubububu the Mummy is shorter and has more showings per screen.  The only reason TDK didn't win by more is because it's so long.



Well maybe Nolan should have edited his bloated movie down a bit if he wanted to avoid the Mummy steam engine.
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: TakingBackSunday on August 03, 2008, 08:06:24 PM
Did you see the movie yet TVC?
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: TVC15 on August 03, 2008, 08:10:45 PM
Did you see the movie yet TVC?

No, theaters are obviously still too full.  I am more on the "Mummy 3 > Indy 4" party line, but I'll troll wherever I can.
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: FlameOfCallandor on August 03, 2008, 08:15:44 PM
Anything is better than Indy 4
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Joe Molotov on August 03, 2008, 08:30:16 PM
Quote
Universal's "The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor" wasn't able steal the box office crown away from Warner Bros.' juggernaut "The Dark Knight," which pulled off the near-impossible by dropping only 42% in its third weekend to all but cross the $400 million mark in domestic ticket sales.

The race was close, however. "Dragon Emperor" grossed $42.4 million domestically from 3,760 screens, while "Dark Knight" grossed $43.8 million from 4,266 theaters for a cume of $394.9 million.

willcowned

Bubububu the Mummy has a higher per-screen average.  The only reason TDK won is because it's in more theatres.

Universal didn't put it on more screens because they knew it was a turd. Sent to die.
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: The Fake Shemp on August 03, 2008, 09:04:42 PM
These are estimates.  Sometimes they're 1.5 million off!  What if we find out The Mummy made more tomorrow!
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: TVC15 on August 03, 2008, 09:10:49 PM
These are estimates.  Sometimes they're 1.5 million off!  What if we find out The Mummy made more tomorrow!

Yes, these people forget that MUMMIES NEVER PLAY FAIR
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: The Fake Shemp on August 03, 2008, 09:11:45 PM
NEVER EVER!
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Phoenix Dark on August 04, 2008, 12:46:25 AM
not so sure about that
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Madrun Badrun on August 04, 2008, 01:06:47 AM
Indy 4 was awesome STFU.
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Tauntaun on August 04, 2008, 09:56:21 AM
I was on vacation last week and I saw Mummy 3 with my family.  SOOOOO SOOOO BAD. smh  If the movie had been a kung-fu movie with all chinese people then it would have been cool but:

(http://www.horror-movies.ca/albums/mummy3/mummy3-rd2-4.jpg)

douchebag 1 & douchebag 2
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Joe Molotov on August 04, 2008, 04:54:58 PM
These are estimates.  Sometimes they're 1.5 million off!  What if we find out The Mummy made more tomorrow!

You were right, the estimates were more then $1.5 Million off! The Mummy 3's actual was more than $1.5 Million lower than the estimate. Not even Zombie Jet Li and Yeti can stop Dark Knight.
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Joe Molotov on August 04, 2008, 04:59:49 PM
people getting worked up over generic blockbusters.  yawn.

Indeed, Mummy 3 is nothing to get worked up over. Spend your money on arthouse, Oscar-bait like Dark Knight instead.
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: MyNameIsMethodis on August 04, 2008, 05:07:56 PM
TDK was really bad in retrospec. So much wrong with it. There's even a front page article on Yahoo about what people hated about it.  :lol
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: FlameOfCallandor on August 04, 2008, 05:10:02 PM
TDK was really bad in retrospec. So much wrong with it. There's even a front page article on Yahoo about what people hated about it.  :lol

Didnt you hate it from the beginning? I think the phrase "in retrospec" is reserved for people who change opinions.


Also, saw the movie again yesterday. Still a great movie.
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: MyNameIsMethodis on August 04, 2008, 05:12:53 PM
Whatever, i'm not american so I don't type in american so sorry if my american is bad

Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: FlameOfCallandor on August 04, 2008, 05:14:51 PM
In retrospect Dark Knight is still awesome. LOL there are like 100 generously positive reviews on Rotten. OMG ROLFBBQ!!1
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Howard Alan Treesong on August 04, 2008, 05:17:52 PM
Titanic > TDK
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Crushed on August 04, 2008, 05:22:34 PM
what about titanic the animated feature

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v233/MastahCrushed/titanicpartytime2.gif)
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Great Rumbler on August 04, 2008, 05:37:43 PM
TDK was really bad in retrospec. So much wrong with it. There's even a front page article on Yahoo about what people hated about it.  :lol

No, it's an article about people complaining about Bale's Batman voice, which was apparently the only thing that people could think of to complain about.
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Crushed on August 04, 2008, 05:39:20 PM
TDK was really bad in retrospec. So much wrong with it. There's even a front page article on Yahoo about what people hated about it.  :lol

No, it's an article about people complaining about Bale's Batman voice, which was apparently the only thing that people could think of to complain about.

Do you really think Methodis can read?
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Enl on August 04, 2008, 05:59:47 PM
Everytime I see Methodis's name I read My Name is Meth and read his posts as if they were from a meth head. /random thought
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Phoenix Dark on August 04, 2008, 06:22:56 PM
his posts make me want to sew his ass cheeks closed and keep feeding him, and feeding him, and feeding him
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Howard Alan Treesong on August 04, 2008, 06:28:18 PM
I was talking with this student the other day and she said "tomorrow I have to go to math lab" and I heard "meth lab" and was like "damn you have nice teeth for a meth head, girl!"
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Flannel Boy on August 04, 2008, 06:28:34 PM
Why is PD, I'm assuming it's him, allowed to change his name every other week?
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: FlameOfCallandor on August 04, 2008, 06:46:22 PM
Cause PeeDee thinks hes funny or some shit.
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: MyNameIsMethodis on August 04, 2008, 07:27:11 PM
You fools are just jealous that someone on the internet has a reasonable peace of mind.
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: MyNameIsMethodis on August 04, 2008, 09:17:11 PM
Um no, it was just a typo in the thread title, I even said in the original post you fucking idiot japafag sucking mother hucking cock sneezing inbred breeding guy anus licking while touching everyones penises which you like because you're a penis liker and even if you're not a penis liker it still sounds awesome to call you a penis liker because i'm sure deep down inside of you there is a penis liker in there that it was the best movie of 99 IMHO
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: The Sceneman on August 04, 2008, 09:18:18 PM
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v233/MastahCrushed/titanicpartytime2.gif)>(http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/510E12W64QL._SL500_AA240_.jpg)>Titanic > TDK
Fixed
Duly noted Crushed

fuck thats a good gif
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Solo on August 04, 2008, 09:21:03 PM
Even if it *were* a typo, which I don't believe for a second, who in the hell refers to a year as "the 99's"?

BEST MOVIE OF THE '08'S!
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Mandark on August 04, 2008, 09:22:10 PM
This thread has made it impossible for me to troll the Mummy without getting embroiled in the larger TDK warz.
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: MyNameIsMethodis on August 04, 2008, 09:25:00 PM
Even if it *were* a typo, which I don't believe for a second, who in the hell refers to a year as "the 99's"?

BEST MOVIE OF THE '08'S!

It was because the post was originally going to be best movies of the 90's but I ended up watching Go while working on the post and just wanted to make a Go appreciation post, and forgot to change the title.
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Crushed on August 04, 2008, 09:25:35 PM
Um no, it was just a typo in the thread title, I even said in the original post you fucking idiot japafag sucking mother hucking cock sneezing inbred breeding guy anus licking while touching everyones penises which you like because you're a penis liker and even if you're not a penis liker it still sounds awesome to call you a penis liker because i'm sure deep down inside of you there is a penis liker in there that it was the best movie of 99 IMHO
we have another autistic poster i see.  good for you.

Who is the lowest functioning autistic poster?

Methodis, Wolf Gang, Pharmacy, or laeapsppssppaznz?
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Solo on August 04, 2008, 09:26:37 PM
This thread has made it impossible for me to troll the Mummy without getting embroiled in the larger TDK warz.

Mummy 3 trolls itself by losing #1 spot at the BO to a movie in its third week.
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: MyNameIsMethodis on August 04, 2008, 09:27:54 PM
Whatever, I could never face off against the TDK Illuminati with rational thoughts that aren't sucking off the penis of a cartoon character.
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Flannel Boy on August 04, 2008, 09:28:56 PM


Who is the lowest functioning autistic poster?

Methodis, Wolf Gang, Pharmacy, or laeapsppssppaznz?

Whatever, I could never face off against the TDK Illuminati with rational thoughts that aren't sucking off the penis of a cartoon character.

Does that answer your question?
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Solo on August 04, 2008, 09:32:50 PM
This thread has made it impossible for me to troll the Mummy without getting embroiled in the larger TDK warz.

Mummy 3 trolls itself by losing #1 spot at the BO to a movie in its third week.
Forum trolls itself by arguing BO numbers of big summer films. :'(

What else is there to argue about them? Artistic merit?
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: MyNameIsMethodis on August 04, 2008, 09:33:25 PM
Apparently autistic merit between the illuminati
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Eel O'Brian on August 04, 2008, 09:34:06 PM
Um no, it was just a typo in the thread title, I even said in the original post you fucking idiot japafag sucking mother hucking cock sneezing inbred breeding guy anus licking while touching everyones penises which you like because you're a penis liker and even if you're not a penis liker it still sounds awesome to call you a penis liker because i'm sure deep down inside of you there is a penis liker in there that it was the best movie of 99 IMHO

^ wrote for the alone in the dark game
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Enl on August 04, 2008, 09:35:14 PM
PENIS! PENIS! PENIS! PENIS!

Admit it, you like the penis.
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Eric P on August 04, 2008, 09:40:42 PM
What else is there to argue about them? Artistic merit?


Did anyone else see Tell No One?

that was pretty fucking great

until the absolute end

Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: pilonv1 on August 04, 2008, 11:45:36 PM
wtf happened to the x-files movie :lol
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Joe Molotov on August 05, 2008, 12:32:17 AM
wtf happened to the x-files movie :lol

It got Serenity'ed.
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Flannel Boy on August 05, 2008, 12:33:41 AM
Serenity wasn't bad.  :(
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Great Rumbler on August 05, 2008, 02:46:55 AM
Serenity wasn't bad.  :(

And yet it still bombed hard.  :'(

At least we can seek comfort in the fact that another terrible Eddie Murphy movie tanked even harder on a bigger budget.
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Mr. Gundam on August 05, 2008, 02:53:16 AM
Serenity wasn't bad.  :(

And yet it still bombed hard.  :'(

At least we can seek comfort in the fact that another terrible Eddie Murphy movie tanked even harder on a bigger budget.

Who the hell greenlights those... things?

The Adventures of Pluto Nash cost $100 million to make. It made $7 million worldwide.
Meet Dave cost $55 million to make. It's made $10 million.

Just think of all the good that could've been done with that money. Feeding the poor, funding AIDS research, providing people with affordable housing? Nope! Let's make another shitty Eddie Murphy "family" comedy that no one will want to watch!
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Joe Molotov on August 05, 2008, 03:07:54 AM
The real question is what brain trust had the idea "Hey, let's make a Sci-Fi comedy with Eddie Murphy! That's never been tried before!"
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Mr. Gundam on August 05, 2008, 03:11:38 AM
The real question is what brain trust had the idea "Hey, let's make a Sci-Fi comedy with Eddie Murphy! That's never been tried before!"

20th Century Fox distribution executive Bert Livingston said of the box office bomb that cost $55 million to make, "It was a tough concept to get across. It's upsetting for all of us and for Eddie. He's very funny in this. Just not enough people came."

Apparently we're not cool enough to "get it."
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: MyNameIsMethodis on August 05, 2008, 08:39:24 AM
I love how they make fun of Eddie Murphy in 30 Rock with Tracy Jordans character  :lol
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: DJ_Tet on August 05, 2008, 08:41:55 AM
tracy jordan  :lol
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: MyNameIsMethodis on August 05, 2008, 12:34:36 PM
He's my favorite character in the show
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Olivia Wilde Homo on August 05, 2008, 07:12:56 PM
He's my favorite character in the show

He was laughing that you said Tracy Jordan, as opposed to Tracy Morgan, the actual name of the actor.
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: WrikaWrek on August 05, 2008, 07:51:30 PM
I saw Mummy 3 with friends, and we all thought it was a really funny action movie. It was a easy going experience.

I saw Dark Knight too, 2 times, it was much better the 1st time around, because you believe Joker will pull it off, and let's face it, nobody gives a fuck about Batman in Dark Knight, it was the joker show with a bit of two face on the side. Heath Ledger deserves the oscar. And i never liked the joker before.

And somebody teach Nolan how to direct action, i mean the chase sequence was boring as shit.
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: MyNameIsMethodis on August 05, 2008, 08:35:46 PM
He's my favorite character in the show

He was laughing that you said Tracy Jordan, as opposed to Tracy Morgan, the actual name of the actor.

Why would I say Tracy Morgan though? The character in the shows name is Tracy Jordan....
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: CajoleJuice on August 05, 2008, 08:38:51 PM
He's my favorite character in the show

He was laughing that you said Tracy Jordan, as opposed to Tracy Morgan, the actual name of the actor.

Why would I say Tracy Morgan though? The character in the shows name is Tracy Jordan....

Quote
I love how they make fun of Eddie Murphy in 30 Rock with Tracy Jordans character
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: FlameOfCallandor on August 05, 2008, 08:56:38 PM
LOL the chase scene was fucking amazing.
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: WrikaWrek on August 05, 2008, 09:09:44 PM
The final part sure, when the truck gets turned over. Before that, boring and unexciting. There was no speed, it was like things were happening in a really slow and casual way.

Pretty crappy action directing. And whats up with Batman's fighting? Only involves waist up, the moves always look the same, some weird punches with the characters waiting to be hit, pretty crappy fighting choreo.
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: TakingBackSunday on August 05, 2008, 09:24:12 PM
*sigh*

I'm not gonna even say anything.
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Solo on August 05, 2008, 09:31:12 PM
I DO agree that Nolan's chase scenes for whatever reason lack any sense of speed. The same was true of the chase in BB - the cars feel like they're going about 40mph tops.
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: cool breeze on August 05, 2008, 09:36:45 PM
I thought the chase sequence was amazing, but I do agree that they did lack a sense of speed.  I don't think there is anything really wrong with that.  I mean, both with the Batpod and the Tumbler, it showed them using shortcuts most of the time, so it almost made sense in a way.
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: MyNameIsMethodis on August 05, 2008, 09:39:21 PM
He's my favorite character in the show

He was laughing that you said Tracy Jordan, as opposed to Tracy Morgan, the actual name of the actor.

Why would I say Tracy Morgan though? The character in the shows name is Tracy Jordan....

Quote
I love how they make fun of Eddie Murphy in 30 Rock with Tracy Jordans character

I don't see whats wrong with waht I said?
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Solo on August 05, 2008, 09:46:45 PM
Protip: Tracey Morgan actually exists. Tracey Jordon on the other hand, does not. Get it?
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: MyNameIsMethodis on August 05, 2008, 09:57:17 PM
No, because I knew that before I wrote that post.

Maybe it was because I put character in there to explain to people who don't watch the show that Tracy Jordan is a character in the show.
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Flannel Boy on August 06, 2008, 11:53:11 AM
 ::)

I hated Scarface and hated Al Pacino's character.

I hated Scarface and hated Tony Montana's character.

Which makes more sense.

You were obviously referring to the actor.
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: TVC15 on August 06, 2008, 12:14:26 PM
Scarface sucks.
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Eric P on August 06, 2008, 12:19:59 PM
Scarface sucks.

cosigned

gg, "gangstas"

what's next on your checklist of overhyped 80s bullshit, endlessly pimpin pound puppies, cuz they dawgs in cages like my peeps ray-ray and leroy who just want to be taken into a loving an caring home filled with hot bitches?
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: MyNameIsMethodis on August 06, 2008, 04:44:55 PM
::)

I hated Scarface and hated Al Pacino's character.

I hated Scarface and hated Tony Montana's character.

Which makes more sense.

You were obviously referring to the actor.

No I wasn't. Maybe it's just a different way of talking up here in Venezuala, but we always say character when talking about a character.
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: MyNameIsMethodis on August 06, 2008, 08:48:38 PM
I said Tracy Jordans character, with no apostraphe, not indicating ownership on Tracy Jordans behalf.
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: Joe Molotov on August 06, 2008, 09:04:02 PM
Critics, film-goers, and box office agrees: Box Office discussion > Semantics debate
Title: Re: Critics, film goers and box office agree: Mummy 3 > The Dark Knight!
Post by: DJ_Tet on August 06, 2008, 09:49:02 PM
For the record, I was laughing because he called Tracy Morgan 'Tracy Jordan.'  Of course, when I did that, I had no idea that Tracy Jordan was the name of the character, so when I googled it after his response I felt appropriately stupid.