THE BORE
General => The Superdeep Borehole => Topic started by: recursivelyenumerable on October 15, 2008, 07:44:19 PM
-
never mind, this was a bit dumb
-
Not really.
-
malek being a jerk:
Topic: jesus christ wtf @ microsoft (Read 3 times)
i am reading some IT-pro-oriented documentation for sharepoint (don't ask why) and i encounter this lovely paragraph:
There were some key scenarios that the product team wanted to address. The most important scenario was the extranet scenario. In this scenario, administrators seek to collaborate with vendors, partners, and customers and control the authentication methods to their collaboration sites without having to add external accounts to their Active Directory. There were reverse proxy and perimeter network (also known as DMZ or demilitarized zone) configurations that the previous version of Windows SharePoint Services didn't support very well. In addition, not all administrators wanted to use NTLM authentication in their extranet scenarios.
as an IT pro who presumably is uninterested in development, what is a product team or a scenario and why should I care? do ms's technical writers actually read what they write before having it published?
-
malek being a jerk:
Topic: jesus christ wtf @ microsoft (Read 3 times)
i am reading some IT-pro-oriented documentation for sharepoint (don't ask why) and i encounter this lovely paragraph:
There were some key scenarios that the product team wanted to address. The most important scenario was the extranet scenario. In this scenario, administrators seek to collaborate with vendors, partners, and customers and control the authentication methods to their collaboration sites without having to add external accounts to their Active Directory. There were reverse proxy and perimeter network (also known as DMZ or demilitarized zone) configurations that the previous version of Windows SharePoint Services didn't support very well. In addition, not all administrators wanted to use NTLM authentication in their extranet scenarios.
as an IT pro who presumably is uninterested in development, what is a product team or a scenario and why should I care? do ms's technical writers actually read what they write before having it published?
what?
-
malek being a jerk:
Topic: jesus christ wtf @ microsoft (Read 3 times)
i am reading some IT-pro-oriented documentation for sharepoint (don't ask why) and i encounter this lovely paragraph:
There were some key scenarios that the product team wanted to address. The most important scenario was the extranet scenario. In this scenario, administrators seek to collaborate with vendors, partners, and customers and control the authentication methods to their collaboration sites without having to add external accounts to their Active Directory. There were reverse proxy and perimeter network (also known as DMZ or demilitarized zone) configurations that the previous version of Windows SharePoint Services didn't support very well. In addition, not all administrators wanted to use NTLM authentication in their extranet scenarios.
as an IT pro who presumably is uninterested in development, what is a product team or a scenario and why should I care? do ms's technical writers actually read what they write before having it published?
what?
That was the original topic.