THE BORE

General => The Superdeep Borehole => Topic started by: Ganhyun on October 22, 2008, 12:01:25 PM

Title: San Francisco weighs decriminalizing prostitution
Post by: Ganhyun on October 22, 2008, 12:01:25 PM
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D93V4U0O0&show_article=1

So, what is the Bore's thoughts on this?

Me? I honestly think everyone should follow Nevada's law, where it is legal and there are requirements in place to protect both the worker and the client.
Title: Re: San Francisco weighs decriminalizing prostitution
Post by: ShogunOfFear on October 22, 2008, 12:03:38 PM
Sounds good to me.  I approve  :)
Title: Re: San Francisco weighs decriminalizing prostitution
Post by: Brehvolution on October 22, 2008, 12:04:52 PM
I like this line of thinking....
It' like they think that people would be less gay if it was easier to get laid.
Title: Re: San Francisco weighs decriminalizing prostitution
Post by: Ganhyun on October 22, 2008, 12:18:15 PM
I like this line of thinking....
It' like they think that people would be less gay if it was easier to get laid.

What do you mean by this? Maybe I'm not getting what you are saying?
Title: Re: San Francisco weighs decriminalizing prostitution
Post by: Brehvolution on October 22, 2008, 01:08:55 PM
Doesn't San Fran have a large gay population?
Title: Re: San Francisco weighs decriminalizing prostitution
Post by: Mr. Gundam on October 22, 2008, 01:18:57 PM
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D93V4U0O0&show_article=1

So, what is the Bore's thoughts on this?

Me? I honestly think everyone should follow Nevada's law, where it is legal and there are requirements in place to protect both the worker and the client.

I agree, it should be like the law in Nevada. This law would make it very hard for the SF police to crack down on sex trafficking.
Title: Re: San Francisco weighs decriminalizing prostitution
Post by: Phoenix Dark on October 22, 2008, 01:20:55 PM
^^^

Which is why I wouldn't support this. Sex trafficking is already a problem in the US and this would merely bolster it.

Legal brothels with health laws=yes
Street hookerin'=no

Title: Re: San Francisco weighs decriminalizing prostitution
Post by: Mr. Gundam on October 22, 2008, 01:31:50 PM
^^^

Which is why I wouldn't support this. Sex trafficking is already a problem in the US and this would merely bolster it.

Legal brothels with health laws=yes
Street hookerin'=no



The mayor of SF, who's pretty damn liberal, is against this initiative. I'm sure that's a big reason why.
Title: Re: San Francisco weighs decriminalizing prostitution
Post by: xnikki118x on October 22, 2008, 02:32:15 PM
I don't like it. All it's doing is making it more difficult for the cops to prosecute. It's not doing anything good for the workers.

^^^

Which is why I wouldn't support this. Sex trafficking is already a problem in the US and this would merely bolster it.

Legal brothels with health laws=yes
Street hookerin'=no



Yes, this. :)
Title: Re: San Francisco weighs decriminalizing prostitution
Post by: Ganhyun on October 22, 2008, 04:30:51 PM
Yes, its nice to see that so many people agree with me in that this law itself is more hurtful than helpful. Nevada's laws on this are really good and have all the necessary things to keep it going properly in place.