THE BORE

General => Video Game Bored => Topic started by: Jabberwocky on November 28, 2008, 05:23:07 PM

Title: There's only one sequel that Square Enix needs to make
Post by: Jabberwocky on November 28, 2008, 05:23:07 PM

:hyper Slime Mori Mori 3 :hyper

:hyper online tank battles :hyper

Title: Re: There's only one sequel that Square Enix needs to make
Post by: Joe Molotov on November 28, 2008, 05:24:47 PM

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/4/49/Rad_racer_box_front.jpg)

Now with the PS3, it could have 4-D action!  :hyper

Title: Re: There's only one sequel that Square Enix needs to make
Post by: Arbys Roast Beef Sandwich on November 28, 2008, 06:10:03 PM

Hell yeah, Rocket Slime was so awesome.

Title: Re: There's only one sequel that Square Enix needs to make
Post by: cool breeze on November 28, 2008, 06:15:28 PM

Bushido Blade 3 for 360/PS3/not Wii

and I watched a video of Cloud vs Sephiroth from Dissidia earlier today and the game looks really dumb.  It reminds me of that blurnsball episode of Futurama where random shit goes off for no reason.

Title: Re: There's only one sequel that Square Enix needs to make
Post by: Kestastrophe on November 28, 2008, 06:17:24 PM

Yeah I actually liked and finished Rocket Slime despite its kiddy exterior

Title: Re: There's only one sequel that Square Enix needs to make
Post by: Greatness Gone on November 28, 2008, 06:29:03 PM

Lets get some Vagrant Story up in this bitch.

Title: Re: There's only one sequel that Square Enix needs to make
Post by: y2kev on November 28, 2008, 06:34:27 PM

Quote from: Greatness Gone on November 28, 2008, 06:29:03 PM

Lets get some Vagrant Story up in this bitch.

You don't want them making another VS. Though Akiyama is still there to direct the cutscenes.

They need to make another Actraiser.

Title: Re: There's only one sequel that Square Enix needs to make
Post by: Arbys Roast Beef Sandwich on November 28, 2008, 06:52:34 PM

In related news, the English translation project for Slime Mori Mori 1 looks to be going well. (http://agtp.romhack.net/news.php?date=2008-11-15+05%3A14%3A21)

Title: Re: There's only one sequel that Square Enix needs to make
Post by: HyperZoneWasAwesome on November 28, 2008, 08:33:40 PM

the fuck?

This isn't about Einhander!

Title: Re: There's only one sequel that Square Enix needs to make
Post by: Great Rumbler on November 28, 2008, 10:16:07 PM

Everyone in this thread is wrong. WRONNNNNNG.

This is the only game that needs a sequel:

(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/8/86/Squares_tom_sawyer_package.png)

Title: Re: There's only one sequel that Square Enix needs to make
Post by: Greatness Gone on November 28, 2008, 11:46:06 PM

PD is in that pic. Can you find him?

Title: Re: There's only one sequel that Square Enix needs to make
Post by: Third on November 29, 2008, 09:34:16 AM

Quote from: Greatness Gone on November 28, 2008, 06:29:03 PM

Lets get some Vagrant Story up in this bitch.

No and Yes.

I don't want SE to rape the franchise. But I also want a new VS.

Title: Re: There's only one sequel that Square Enix needs to make
Post by: tiesto on November 29, 2008, 10:02:29 AM

Quote from: Greatness Gone on November 28, 2008, 11:46:06 PM

PD is in that pic. Can you find him?

The white guy with the blonde hair and red suit in the middle?

The sequel that SE needs to make is:

(http://www.rpgclassics.com/subsites/floating/lal.jpg)

Title: Re: There's only one sequel that Square Enix needs to make
Post by: modkennylaine on November 29, 2008, 12:10:21 PM

Unlike  :bow VS :bow2, the team that made TWEWY is still around, right? I'll go with a sequel to that.

Title: Re: There's only one sequel that Square Enix needs to make
Post by: y2kev on November 29, 2008, 12:14:05 PM

Quote from: tiesto on November 29, 2008, 10:02:29 AM

Quote from: Greatness Gone on November 28, 2008, 11:46:06 PM

PD is in that pic. Can you find him?

The white guy with the blonde hair and red suit in the middle?

The sequel that SE needs to make is:

(http://www.rpgclassics.com/subsites/floating/lal.jpg)

I always hear this said "liv alive" but the katakana makes it look like it should be live alive.