THE BORE

General => Video Game Bored => Topic started by: Jansen on December 24, 2008, 03:21:04 AM

Title: lord of the rings conquest is really really bad
Post by: Jansen on December 24, 2008, 03:21:04 AM
it looks like a ps2 game and the gameplay is not good. at all.

none of your moves look fluid and the hit detection is shit.

download the psn demo and witness the horror for yourself.
Title: Re: lord of the rings conquest is really really bad
Post by: trippingmartian on December 24, 2008, 04:05:50 AM
How does it compare to mercenaries 2?
Title: Re: lord of the rings conquest is really really bad
Post by: demi on December 24, 2008, 04:07:56 AM
its not like mercenaries, its LOTR Battlefront
Title: Re: lord of the rings conquest is really really bad
Post by: trippingmartian on December 24, 2008, 04:21:41 AM
That just sounds wrong. Does Pandemic have multiple dev teams or something?
Title: Re: lord of the rings conquest is really really bad
Post by: Fragamemnon on December 24, 2008, 04:22:59 AM
I saw a video of this a couple of weeks ago and it looked terrible. not surprised it plays like a turd.
Title: Re: lord of the rings conquest is really really bad
Post by: TVC15 on December 24, 2008, 04:27:23 AM
That just sounds wrong. Does Pandemic have multiple dev teams or something?

They'd have to have at least 2 between this and Mercs 2.
Title: Re: lord of the rings conquest is really really bad
Post by: demi on December 24, 2008, 04:32:24 AM
That just sounds wrong. Does Pandemic have multiple dev teams or something?

There's Pandemic Australia and Pandemic USA
Title: Re: lord of the rings conquest is really really bad
Post by: cool breeze on December 24, 2008, 09:16:24 AM
I saw this on PSN yesterday and sailed right past it.  The videos I saw a while back made it look like Lair 2.
Title: Re: lord of the rings conquest is really really bad
Post by: Eel O'Brian on December 24, 2008, 02:30:46 PM
i liked it, but i am a fan of the star wars battlefront games

it does not look like a ps2 game

it looks okay, not the greatest graphics in the world, but certainly better than, say, warhawk

i bet it'll be a lot of fun online
Title: Re: lord of the rings conquest is really really bad
Post by: Jansen on December 24, 2008, 03:31:56 PM
in single player the graphics must be a lot better cuz in MP it looks terrible. not ps2 level, but it is pretty freakin bad.

i haven't played SP so maybe the game plays better but the MP is horrible.

and i also love battlefront 1 & 2. but in those games i could easily hit what i was targeting.

Title: Re: lord of the rings conquest is really really bad
Post by: demi on January 02, 2009, 04:14:35 PM
This game is awesome. It's like Dynasty Warriors + Battlefront.
Title: Re: lord of the rings conquest is really really bad
Post by: cool breeze on January 04, 2009, 11:30:14 PM
this game isn't that bad...it's better than Ninja Blade

biggest problem is that no single class can last on their own.  I mean, it's good for playing as a team, but most people don't do that and it all falls apart.
Title: Re: lord of the rings conquest is really really bad
Post by: Jansen on January 05, 2009, 03:44:06 AM
battlefront 3 hasn't been canned, it switched developers

and yes, this game is bad.
Title: Re: lord of the rings conquest is really really bad
Post by: cool breeze on January 05, 2009, 11:04:11 AM
Yeah, when I said it wasn't that bad yesterday, that was after I did the single player tutorial part.  Online is really messy and the 'vehicles' are all terrible.

Title: Re: lord of the rings conquest is really really bad
Post by: notstupid on January 06, 2009, 02:18:05 AM
pandemic just fucking sucks this generation.  last gen; mercenaries 1, battlefront (okay, it was a shameless ripoff), full spectrum warrior!  fun, NOT SHITTY, NOT GLITCHY, NOT UGLY, and you could actually control them rather decently. 
Title: Re: lord of the rings conquest is really really bad
Post by: Kestastrophe on January 12, 2009, 10:14:27 AM
Technically this game is bad, but I was having fun with the online portion in the demo. The melee combat is really sloppy. I might rent it
Title: Re: lord of the rings conquest is really really bad
Post by: Purple Filth on January 12, 2009, 12:13:33 PM
oh well

Did you bother trying out God Hand OP?
Title: Re: lord of the rings conquest is really really bad
Post by: Jansen on January 14, 2009, 09:24:23 PM
http://www.oxmonline.com/article/reviews/xbox-360/g-l/lord-rings-conquest

Quote
It’s when you play as the hack-and-slash classes — the warrior and scout — that frustration digs in. Cutting through orcs and uruk-hai is easy enough, but it’s nearly impossible to do it without suffering tons of damage in the process. You have lots of useful combos but no lock-on options, and the blocking system is so vague that it’s hard to tell if you’re actually defending yourself. Most fights involving the warrior are a war of attrition, relying on having enough lives to see you through.

http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/944/944390p1.html

Quote
Moreover, the combat is pretty damn clunky. Throwing combos is something that's built into Conquest but there are no breakaway animations or preloading possible when fighting. What that leads to is a painful pause as you are forced to wait for the previous move to carry out. Slamming buttons and seeing no result can be a bit frustrating and it happens often in LOTR:C. It's not that the fighting system doesn't work; it's that it was poorly designed.

Quote
Graphically, The Lord of the Rings: Conquest is clearly built for multiplayer, which is to say that it's not exactly impressive. The best looking piece to the puzzle is the environmental sets that feel like they were designed by Peter Jackson himself (no doubt, they were). It's a bummer that everything is unimpressive. Textures are smudged and smeared around and character models could be much smoother and higher resolution. The framerate hitches on occasion and smoke has an odd effect on characters it surrounds.
Title: Re: lord of the rings conquest is really really bad
Post by: Eel O'Brian on January 14, 2009, 09:46:06 PM
will buy at $20 :hyper
Title: Re: lord of the rings conquest is really really bad
Post by: Andowsky on January 15, 2009, 10:45:21 AM
Demo was amazing. Classes are balanced very well. If I could make any small changes I would make scouts take a little more damage and warriors take a little less damage but other than that, great job porting Battlefront into the superior Lord of the Rings universe  :bow2

Graphics don't matter in a game like this.
Title: Re: lord of the rings conquest is really really bad
Post by: brawndolicious on January 15, 2009, 01:21:46 PM
I only played the demo but that review seems pretty unfinished.  The scouts are REALLY deadly, especially in multiplayer where you can cloak and throw bombs, and you only switch to warriors when you need pure brute force.  The classes seem very well balanced to me.  The graphics are okay but the art is pretty good so it's a decent enough game to look at.  I don't really like the mission structure though from what I've seen of it.  It seems too repetitive.
Title: Re: lord of the rings conquest is really really bad
Post by: CHOW CHOW on January 15, 2009, 01:26:41 PM
The multi-player is lots of fun.  I play the demo almost everyday.  The gameplay needs more depth, though.  Yeah, there's several classes and each one has several attacks but there isn't much beyond that.  I would've liked to have some customization / ranks / leveling up... you know, being able to customize your character with different weapons and shit.  Maybe you can do that in the full version. 
Title: Re: lord of the rings conquest is really really bad
Post by: Andowsky on January 15, 2009, 01:57:45 PM
There are more modes/maps/heroes in the final game. Ever been on a team full of people who talk and know what they're doing? It's far from shallow in that situation.
Title: Re: lord of the rings conquest is really really bad
Post by: Herr Mafflard on January 15, 2009, 02:03:44 PM
I thought the demo for this was horrible - clunky and unsatisfactory. But then again, I really liked the Fracture demo, so my opinion clearly doesn't count.