THE BORE

General => The Superdeep Borehole => Topic started by: Tieno on March 06, 2009, 03:55:59 AM

Title: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Tieno on March 06, 2009, 03:55:59 AM
http://www.apple.com/trailers/paramount/startrek/hd/


Star Trek Trailer > original Star Wars
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Dickie Dee on March 06, 2009, 04:08:14 AM
I anticipate this movie without feelings.

ST's carcass has been beaten to death so much that any attempt to give it CPR should be met with the realization that it'd be nice if a miracle occurred and a pulse was found, but if it that doesn't happen it's ok to just pack the bags up and feel good that at least they tried.

(still, Kirk broodingly riding his motorbike through a cornfield only to see the Enterprise being built, LOL WUT)
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Phoenix Dark on March 06, 2009, 04:14:53 AM
Ok, that was a fuck awesome trailer. Too bad the movie will be average at best
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Eel O'Brian on March 06, 2009, 06:52:58 AM
as someone who doesn't give a crap about star trek either way, this looks interesting
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: The Fake Shemp on March 06, 2009, 07:24:47 AM
From the writers of Transformers, eh?  B+
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: WrikaWrek on March 06, 2009, 07:32:42 AM
Bunch of special effects shots, and a douche as the main piece.

What's the big deal?
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: The Fake Shemp on March 06, 2009, 07:46:52 AM
Yeah, I was pretty underwhelmed by the trailer.  The bit where they're like BUT WE HAVE NO CAPN!  And Kirk goes, "YES WE DO!" and sits in the chair?  Hokeyville.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Cheebs on March 06, 2009, 08:29:30 AM
Star Trek > Transformers 2 :bow


Though I gotta admit the people behind this are obviously trying waaaay too hard to make it seem like this is the Batman Begins of this year. Trailer's style and the music comes across totally as KIRK BEGINS.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: ToxicAdam on March 06, 2009, 08:47:49 AM
As a Sci-fi fan, I thought it looked good. Kind of Wrath of Khan meets Kirk origin. Which sounds pretty good to me.

When almost half of the Trek movies are garbage, its not like the bar is set too high.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Greatness Gone on March 06, 2009, 10:59:32 AM
I just want the score for this shit already. Who cares about the movie?
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Cheebs on March 06, 2009, 11:28:20 AM
I just want the score for this shit already. Who cares about the movie?

GG:

Chris Pine hot or not?
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: G The Resurrected on March 06, 2009, 12:44:47 PM
I love trek, I love trailer, I love abrams, I love alternate history tales, I love spock la cock grande and simon pegg. THIS MOVIE IS WIN
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Dickie Dee on March 06, 2009, 03:02:09 PM
Still think they missed on the Kirk casting. It'd be hard to find another Shatner (say what you will about his acting, but he was likable while still swaggering like a pimp) but just casting a sorta generic pretty-boy for the role feels off. Should've gone with someone with more personality but still good-looking.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Bloodwake on March 06, 2009, 03:08:02 PM
Evidently AICN heard something to the effect of Picard and Data showing up in the new Star Trek movie, which makes me halfway fanboy excited and half way  :yuck :yuck :yuck :yuck :yuck
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Dickie Dee on March 06, 2009, 03:11:28 PM
Evidently AICN heard something to the effect of Picard and Data showing up in the new Star Trek movie, which makes me halfway fanboy excited and half way  :yuck :yuck :yuck :yuck :yuck

It'd be alright, probably just the first 5 min or something trying to get Spock back in time then they're out.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Cheebs on March 06, 2009, 05:02:41 PM
Evidently AICN heard something to the effect of Picard and Data showing up in the new Star Trek movie, which makes me halfway fanboy excited and half way  :yuck :yuck :yuck :yuck :yuck

They aren't in it.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Dickie Dee on March 06, 2009, 05:04:06 PM
Evidently AICN heard something to the effect of Picard and Data showing up in the new Star Trek movie, which makes me halfway fanboy excited and half way  :yuck :yuck :yuck :yuck :yuck

They aren't in it.
Says?
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Cheebs on March 06, 2009, 05:09:37 PM
Evidently AICN heard something to the effect of Picard and Data showing up in the new Star Trek movie, which makes me halfway fanboy excited and half way  :yuck :yuck :yuck :yuck :yuck

They aren't in it.
Says?

The guy who said it at a panel that got AICN going? He said he was misunderstood. And TrekMovie.com which has been the main site for spoilers in this (had all of the casting announcements before they were public too) said they aren't in it at all. There are 24th century characters but not the TNG Cast.

And tng cast members said they aren't in it, and most of them have bashed this movie too lol.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Bloodwake on March 06, 2009, 05:27:09 PM
Evidently AICN heard something to the effect of Picard and Data showing up in the new Star Trek movie, which makes me halfway fanboy excited and half way  :yuck :yuck :yuck :yuck :yuck

They aren't in it.
Says?

The guy who said it at a panel that got AICN going? He said he was misunderstood. And TrekMovie.com which has been the main site for spoilers in this (had all of the casting announcements before they were public too) said they aren't in it at all. There are 24th century characters but not the TNG Cast.

And tng cast members said they aren't in it, and most of them have bashed this movie too lol.



Well, that's reassuring.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Eel O'Brian on March 06, 2009, 06:19:09 PM
considering there has never been a tng movie more than mediocre, that cast really doesn't have much room to be shit-talking
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Greatness Gone on March 06, 2009, 06:21:26 PM
GG:

Chris Pine hot or not?

Absolutely not.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Dickie Dee on March 06, 2009, 06:29:09 PM
considering there has never been a tng movie more than mediocre, that cast really doesn't have much room to be shit-talking
First Contact  :punch

Everything else was too meh to even remember having an opinion about.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Yeti on March 07, 2009, 12:56:19 PM
I've never seen a Star Trek (movie or episode) but I saw this trailer before watching Watchmen and now I kind of want to see this.  :-\
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Cheebs on March 07, 2009, 12:59:31 PM
I've never seen a Star Trek (movie or episode) but I saw this trailer before watching Watchmen and now I kind of want to see this.  :-\
Praise be to JJ Abrams :bow
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: CHOW CHOW on March 07, 2009, 06:43:42 PM
Bunch of special effects shots, and a douche as the main piece.

What's the big deal?
look at me im wrikawrek and im a negative contrarian motherfucker 24/7 because im wrikawrek
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: WrikaWrek on March 07, 2009, 10:44:23 PM
Bunch of special effects shots, and a douche as the main piece.

What's the big deal?
look at me im wrikawrek and im a negative contrarian motherfucker 24/7 because im wrikawrek

No need to cry about it chow.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Boogie on March 09, 2009, 12:21:55 AM
I've never seen a Star Trek (movie or episode) but I saw this trailer before watching Watchmen and now I kind of want to see this.  :-\
Praise be to JJ Abrams :bow

shut the fuck up cheebs
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Sideshow Raheem on March 09, 2009, 08:03:57 AM
So Kirk's dad was a starship captain?

And now the son isn't given command of the Enterprise but rather "takes" it?

Hmmm....

Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: demi on March 09, 2009, 08:34:27 AM
NERD MOVIE
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: fistfulofmetal on March 09, 2009, 08:35:46 AM
JJ is so awesome
he finally made a good Mission Impossible movie
and now he's doing it with Star Trek.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: demi on March 09, 2009, 08:38:16 AM
NERD MOVIE

But demi, it's a JJ Abrams production.

If it's not LOST then I don't care

NERD MOVIE
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: demi on March 09, 2009, 08:43:50 AM
Opening Night at the theaters nationwide

(http://www.startrek.com.sg/news2008/fiesta05.jpg)

Dood!
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: demi on March 09, 2009, 08:44:53 AM
(http://www.startrekuniformguide.com/gallery/StarTrek4.jpg)

Did anyone order an escort????? lol lol
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: demi on March 09, 2009, 08:46:28 AM
You just killed any excitement I had for this movie. Thanks demi.

That's Larry Hyrb on the right. He's SUPER EXCITED!!!!
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Boogie on March 09, 2009, 06:34:35 PM
JJ is so awesome
he finally made a good Mission Impossible movie
and now he's doing it with Star Trek.

The implication in your statement is that there has not yet been a good Star Trek movie.

In response, I say: fuck you.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: trippingmartian on March 10, 2009, 01:58:37 AM
Quite a few people erupted in laughter when the trailer was shown at my local theatre. I thought it was kind of cool, and I don't even care for Star Trek.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: chronovore on March 10, 2009, 10:07:31 AM
I'm excited for seeing Karl Urban in something that's not got him as a brooding jerk.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Tauntaun on March 10, 2009, 10:22:04 AM
Quite a few people erupted in laughter when the trailer was shown at my local theatre. I thought it was kind of cool, and I don't even care for Star Trek.

Did you punch them in the dick out of principle?  :punch  :maf

spoiler (click to show/hide)
Then in the butt?

:tauntaun

 :-*
[close]
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: ManaByte on March 10, 2009, 06:24:46 PM
I'm excited for seeing Karl Urban in something that's not got him as a brooding jerk.

Well he is Bones...
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: lordmaji on March 10, 2009, 09:07:03 PM
looks interesting.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: chronovore on March 13, 2009, 02:53:48 AM
I'm excited for seeing Karl Urban in something that's not got him as a brooding jerk.

Well he is Bones...

LOL. Yeah, OK, good point. But he's not an EMO brooding jerk. Riddick, LotR, DOOM. I liked it better when he was hamming it up as Caesar on Xena.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: ManaByte on March 13, 2009, 01:45:54 PM
I think even if everyone else fails epically, Simon Pegg won't. He at least knows who Scotty is and probably has seen more Star Trek than the entire cast and crew combined.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: ToxicAdam on March 13, 2009, 02:09:36 PM
I don't think living up to a bunch of bad tv actors should be that hard.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: duckman2000 on March 13, 2009, 02:11:24 PM
Looks hot
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Cheebs on March 13, 2009, 02:14:40 PM
I think even if everyone else fails epically, Simon Pegg won't. He at least knows who Scotty is and probably has seen more Star Trek than the entire cast and crew combined.
Bob Orci one of the writers is a big trek guy, no?
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Phoenix Dark on March 13, 2009, 07:11:49 PM
I think even if everyone else fails epically, Simon Pegg won't. He at least knows who Scotty is and probably has seen more Star Trek than the entire cast and crew combined.
Bob Orci one of the writers is a big trek guy, no?

^^^
Nerd love 

Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Cheebs on March 13, 2009, 09:30:01 PM
I think even if everyone else fails epically, Simon Pegg won't. He at least knows who Scotty is and probably has seen more Star Trek than the entire cast and crew combined.
Bob Orci one of the writers is a big trek guy, no?

^^^
Nerd love 


Says the guy who cries when reading harry potter.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Phoenix Dark on March 14, 2009, 12:45:09 AM
Sorry, on a nerd scale Star Trek still rates substantially higher than anything Potter related

Being up front about nerd-ness>hiding it in the closet when the cool folks visit
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Dickie Dee on March 14, 2009, 01:13:03 AM
Unless you're a grown-ass man.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Phoenix Dark on March 14, 2009, 01:14:26 AM
A grown ass man should have nothing to be ashamed of. Outside of porn
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Cheebs on March 14, 2009, 09:37:49 AM
So PD, you show off your vast collection of nerdy fantasy books and tell them how Dumbledore's death brought you to tears?
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: The Fake Shemp on March 14, 2009, 11:02:49 AM
 :lol

Crying when Dumbledore died is infinitely nerdier than anything related to Star Trek, save for maybe actually learning Klingon.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: ManaByte on March 14, 2009, 03:26:37 PM
:lol

Crying when Dumbledore died is infinitely nerdier than anything related to Star Trek, save for maybe actually learning Klingon.

(http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/512VKC24XWL._SS500_.jpg)
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: CHOW CHOW on March 14, 2009, 05:19:43 PM
Sorry, on a nerd scale Star Trek still rates substantially higher than anything Potter related

Being up front about nerd-ness>hiding it in the closet when the cool folks visit
something's hot about star trek... it's sort of becoming cool to like it (i'm talking about the original star trek, not the others).  hard to explain... hipster mentality stuff.   anyway, it's starting to rub off on this film... i'm not gonna be ashamed whatsoever going to see this.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Phoenix Dark on March 14, 2009, 06:49:21 PM
So PD, you show off your vast collection of nerdy fantasy books and tell them how Dumbledore's death brought you to tears?

My fantasy collection is pretty good, nothing to be ashamed of. I got a nice LOTR edition set among other things.

DH brought me to tears. Dumbledore's death made me mad iirc
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Cheebs on March 15, 2009, 09:29:03 AM
So PD, you show off your vast collection of nerdy fantasy books and tell them how Dumbledore's death brought you to tears?

My fantasy collection is pretty good, nothing to be ashamed of. I got a nice LOTR edition set among other things.

DH brought me to tears. Dumbledore's death made me mad iirc
What in it made you cry then? lol
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Sideshow Raheem on March 15, 2009, 12:07:04 PM
I liked the original Star Trek because it was oftentimes about people and ideas.

I'm not entirely sure that this new Trek will be about either.

The trailers have to be laden with special effects, quick cuts, and laser battles, I know. I just have a feeling this is going to be heavy on the spectacle and light on the other stuff.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: chronovore on March 17, 2009, 03:28:31 AM
So PD, you show off your vast collection of nerdy fantasy books and tell them how Dumbledore's death brought you to tears?

My fantasy collection is pretty good, nothing to be ashamed of. I got a nice LOTR edition set among other things.

DH brought me to tears. Dumbledore's death made me mad iirc
What in it made you cry then? lol

I cried when Spock died at the end of Wrath of Khan. Then I got all kinds of pissed off when they brought him back in III, and turned him into a autistic savant in IV.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Dickie Dee on March 17, 2009, 05:11:11 AM
TOS Movie ST is the best ST.

Undiscovered Country > Khan > Rest
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Cheebs on March 17, 2009, 09:15:00 AM
So PD, you show off your vast collection of nerdy fantasy books and tell them how Dumbledore's death brought you to tears?

My fantasy collection is pretty good, nothing to be ashamed of. I got a nice LOTR edition set among other things.

DH brought me to tears. Dumbledore's death made me mad iirc
What in it made you cry then? lol

I cried when Spock died at the end of Wrath of Khan. Then I got all kinds of pissed off when they brought him back in III, and turned him into a autistic savant in IV.
It was worth it. Autistic weird Spock in IV was absolutely hilarious.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: ManaByte on March 17, 2009, 02:25:37 PM
TOS Movie ST is the best ST.

Undiscovered Country > Khan > Rest

Khan > First Contact > Rest
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Cheebs on March 17, 2009, 02:27:22 PM
Ranking of the only movies that matter:

Undiscovered Country
Wrath of Khan
Voyage Home
Search for Spock
Motion Picture
Final Frontier

:bow :bow :bow
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: ManaByte on March 17, 2009, 02:29:01 PM
Ranking of the only movies that matter:

Undiscovered Country
Wrath of Khan
Voyage Home
Search for Spock
Motion Picture
Final Frontier

:bow :bow :bow

Final Frontier doesn't exist, just like Nemesis.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Cheebs on March 17, 2009, 02:30:47 PM
Row row row your boat.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: chronovore on March 24, 2009, 11:20:16 PM
Oh, and man, how all the Next Generation movies blew chunks. Pretty much every single one of them is a showcase for the two thespians in the group, Patrick Stewart and Brent Spiner, to trot out their acting chops. What made the TV show great was how all the characters interacted with each other, not a series of monologues.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Cheebs on March 25, 2009, 12:36:52 AM
Overall I think the TOS crew worked better in film rather than on television while the TNG crew worked better as a tv show rather than on film.

Oh and the new tv spot for this is pretty awesome. You can spot Nimoy in one of the shots:
http://www.firstshowing.net/2009/03/23/must-watch-brand-new-tv-spot-for-star-trek/
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Boogie on March 25, 2009, 12:43:14 AM
Overall I think the TOS crew worked better in film rather than on television while the TNG crew worked better as a tv show rather than on film.

Wow.

I think this may have been the first non-fucking-distinguished mentally-challenged thing you've said about Star Trek in the past eight months.

Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: ManaByte on March 28, 2009, 01:24:30 PM
(http://www.aintitcool.com/images2009/trekfinal2.jpg)

WTF
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Cheebs on March 28, 2009, 02:12:02 PM
(http://www.empireonline.com/images/image_index/hw800/32903.jpg)
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: ManaByte on March 28, 2009, 02:13:28 PM
Looks like the Enterprise is blowing up in that one.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: EvilBoris on March 29, 2009, 12:55:04 AM
 star trek will enjoy a prestigious world premiere at a near 1600-something capacity at the sydney opera house concert hall in a week. I send the good word to our paramount pictures australia team for pulling it off. i'll be sure to post warp speed as much of the negative word that will leak. so remember... one week.

http://www.sydneyoperahouse.com/whatson/startrekworldpremiere.aspx
yes cheebs your dream pal chris pine will be there.


http://scifiwire.com/2009/03/treks-leonard-nimoy-speak.php
 
they didn't even have a cinema :lol
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Cheebs on March 29, 2009, 01:07:02 AM
 :lol Nimoy is awesome. Most of his scenes are with Simon Pegg apparently. Which is quite the geek-overload.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Cheebs on March 29, 2009, 04:02:59 PM
Why is Star Trek opening in Australia one day before opening in the US? This is a new trend I'm noticing where American films are opening abroad before in the States.  What's the deal?
10 years ago movies made most of their money domestically. But the worldwide market has been booming for films and now often foreign gross outgrosses domestic numbers. So there is more of a focus on foreign markets now.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Veidt on March 29, 2009, 04:07:49 PM
I think that's what they usually do now with British films. Didn't Harry Potter come out here earlier as well?
I might be wrong on this though. But yeah, I'm all for earlier movie releases.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Cheebs on March 29, 2009, 04:10:07 PM
Makes sense.  I noticed that the last Bond movie came out in Europe before the States too, but 10 years ago when I lived in Germany I'd have to wait a couple months before an American film finally made it over. 
Well that has always been that way for Bond I believe. Bond is decently popular in America but HUGE in Europe.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: ManaByte on March 31, 2009, 04:30:32 AM
http://www.variety.com/article/VR1118001885.html?categoryid=13&cs=1

Quote
As Paramount Pictures readies the May 8 release of its "Star Trek" franchise relaunch, the studio is moving forward with a sequel, and has hired Roberto Orci, Alex Kurtzman and Damon Lindelof to pen the screenplay.

J.J. Abrams, who directed and produced the latest chapter, is onboard to produce the follow-up alongside his Bad Robot partner Bryan Burk. No decision has been made yet on whether Abrams will return behind the camera for the sequel.

Orci, Kurtzman and Lindelof also are receiving producing credit on the sequel.

Story is still in the embryonic stage, but the trio are aiming to deliver their script to the Melrose studio by Christmas for what would likely be a summer 2011 release.

"There's obviously a lot of hubris involved in signing on to write a sequel of a movie that hasn't even come out yet," said Lindelof, co-creator with Abrams of ABC's "Lost" who produced the upcoming "Trek" but did not contribute to Orci and Kurtzman's screenplay. "But we're so excited about the first one that we wanted to proceed."

As for potential storylines, Kurtzman stressed that the writing team will wait to take a cue from fan reaction about which direction to go.

"Obviously we discussed ideas, but we are waiting to see how audiences respond next month," he said. "With a franchise rebirth, the first movie has to be about origin. But with a second, you have the opportunity to explore incredibly exciting things. We'll be ambitious about what we'll do."

Though Orci and Kurtzman have worked together as a writing team for more than 12 years, the duo has worked with Lindelof on only one screenplay: DreamWorks' "Cowboys and Aliens," which they are currently writing together.

Paramount has high hopes for the "Star Trek" relaunch, and is pulling out all the stops on the marketing front. Studio began a full-scale campaign six months before the film's May bow.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Fresh Prince on March 31, 2009, 04:33:21 AM
Looks like the Enterprise is blowing up in that one.
Looks like being built.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Cheebs on March 31, 2009, 09:50:00 AM
Not surprising. A week or two ago I read that Paramounts internal tracking on the movie's performance is huge.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Herr Mafflard on March 31, 2009, 09:58:31 AM
lol She-Hulk's in this.
(http://mos.totalfilm.com/images/9/9-amazing-new-star-trek-shots-00-420-75.jpg)
hmmm... I don't know if I would. One time I had green ketchup - same taste as normal red - but I still couldn't eat it.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Barry Egan on March 31, 2009, 10:03:54 AM
It's all pink on the inside, as they say.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Herr Mafflard on March 31, 2009, 10:09:38 AM
(http://i.current.com/images/asset/895/788/85/o5mu2H.jpg)
 :-X :-X :-X :yuck :yuck :yuck
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Barry Egan on March 31, 2009, 10:24:44 AM
olive green napes :drool
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Herr Mafflard on March 31, 2009, 10:42:18 AM
Quote
Connecting to server...
You're now chatting with a random stranger. Say hi!
You: HELLO
Stranger: hi
You: u like green ketcup?
Stranger: no
You: me neither
You: they're horrid
You: you do like normal ketchup dont you?
Your conversational partner has disconnected.


 :-\
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Barry Egan on March 31, 2009, 10:56:17 AM
this is obviously not a minor issue for you
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: ManaByte on April 07, 2009, 05:08:52 PM
http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Early-Review-Of-JJ-Abrams-Star-Trek-12650.html

Quote
The new Star Trek movie is amazing- easily the best Trek movie since The Wrath of Khan, and a veritable feast of sight and sound: A captivating adventure that grabs you from the first and doesn't let go. The effects are staggering, finally what the stories have deserved so richly. There are enough huge fireballs, shattering explosions and exciting fights to go around. The movie's first 5-10 minutes are of note I feel: This sequence is brilliant and had me immediately on the edge of my seat.

Here's how they showed it:

Quote
Then the movie started, James Horner’s fantastic title music played over the credits, some audience members snickering at “and introducing Kirstie Alley” (I think she’s actually really good as the Vulcan, Saavik, in Khan) and then the first scene. The print was beautiful and then lines started appearing on the print. Booooo… then cuts… then it skipped frame, running for about 10 seconds split in half… up is down, down is up and all that before locking up, the frame burning.

Tim jumped on stage to say he’s going up to fix the problem and called for Orci, Kurtzman and Lindelof to kill some time. They show up, Lindelof going, “Okay… so, you wanna know what the monster is?” Clearly talking about the black smoke monster on LOST. People started shouting out LOST things (“I want to know what the statue is!” etc etc) and suddenly a man shows up on stage wearing a trench coat and a hat.

This man is holding a film can in his hand. He removes the hat and right there is Leonard Nimoy.

The audience went ballistic, standing ovation for the man, the girl behind me losing her shit. He takes a mic asking what’s going on here… why would you only show 10 minutes of the new movie? “JJ made a good movie, why only show 10 minutes of it?” Then he took a vote. Who wants to only see 10 minutes of the movie? Crickets. Who wants to see the whole thing? Thunderous applause .

And within seconds Orci, Kurtzman, Lindelof and Nimoy are off the stage (not before Nimoy could throw out one more Vulcan salute, of course) and JJ Abrams’ Star Trek plays.

Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Veidt on April 07, 2009, 05:15:33 PM
Well, good reviews sound awesome. This is my number one movie to watch this year.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Cheebs on April 07, 2009, 05:56:28 PM
Yeah, these reviews have got me really excited. A whole month to go though.  :-\
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Boogie on April 07, 2009, 06:34:14 PM
Best since Wrath of Khan.  yeah, we'll see about that...  ::)
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Cheebs on April 07, 2009, 08:06:25 PM
Best since Wrath of Khan.  yeah, we'll see about that...  ::)
Even though I am hyped for this movie the surrounding issue about how these guys saw it has to inflate the quality of the movie in their minds.

Going to a showing of a old Star Trek movie which happens all the time and randomly have LEONARD NIMOY show up with a print for a movie not out for over a month has to get them so riled up that it'd be hard to not love it.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Cheebs on April 07, 2009, 08:34:36 PM
Ok this is awesome, 45 sec. clip of when Kirk meets McCoy.

http://movies.yahoo.com/movie/1809752801/video/12865145
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Dickie Dee on April 07, 2009, 09:22:56 PM
Best since Wrath of Khan.  yeah, we'll see about that...  ::)

Considering Undiscovered Country is better than Wrath of Khan, this creates a TIME PARADOX
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Boogie on April 07, 2009, 09:32:02 PM
Best since Wrath of Khan.  yeah, we'll see about that...  ::)

Considering Undiscovered Country is better than Wrath of Khan, this creates a TIME PARADOX

Exactly.

Cheebs makes a good point that the atmosphere in which they watched the movie has doutblessly affected their opinions on it.

Obviously, I have made no secret of my skepticism of this movie, but I will likely see it opening night, with hopefully an open mind.  I will hope that it is good.

But I see almost no way for it to surpass the Wrath of Khan, First Contact, or even The Voyage Home in my eyes.  It will doubtlessly have superior action, but there is no way that this "new" Kirk/Spock/McCoy will come close to matching the performance of the originals, nor most of the rest of the cast. (though I think the idea of Simon Pegg as Scotty is an inspired choice.  oh, and Bruce Greenwood as Pike?  okay, that should be good too)
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: ManaByte on April 08, 2009, 01:53:04 PM
Ok this is awesome, 45 sec. clip of when Kirk meets McCoy.

http://movies.yahoo.com/movie/1809752801/video/12865145

Holy shit he nails it. It's almost like the he has the Katra of Bones in his head.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Veidt on April 08, 2009, 02:05:16 PM
Ok this is awesome, 45 sec. clip of when Kirk meets McCoy.

http://movies.yahoo.com/movie/1809752801/video/12865145

I saw this earlier today. Goodness, this is going to be cool.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Phoenix Dark on April 08, 2009, 02:06:06 PM
Ok this is awesome, 45 sec. clip of when Kirk meets McCoy.

http://movies.yahoo.com/movie/1809752801/video/12865145

 ::)
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Howard Alan Treesong on April 08, 2009, 02:09:36 PM
I can't believe you guys are still excited about a new Star Trek movie after suffering through the prequels
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Veidt on April 08, 2009, 02:11:15 PM
Not me. I've never ever watched one. I also hated every single episode of the tvshows I have tried my best to watch.

This, this looks modern and unique, to me at least.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Eric P on April 08, 2009, 02:27:49 PM
I can't believe you guys are still excited about a new Star Trek movie after suffering through the prequels
the star wars one?

well, this isn't like getting excited over gene roddenberry's andromeda or whatever it was called.  this is a reinterpretation of something which is now iconic, which could be quite cool.

Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Howard Alan Treesong on April 08, 2009, 03:00:57 PM
I can't believe you guys are still excited about a new Star Trek movie after suffering through the prequels
the star wars one?

I dunno what to think of Star Trek reboot, honestly. I've never liked anything JJ Abrams has done, EVER, so I'm highly suspicious

spoiler (click to show/hide)
shh I'm baiting manabyte :shh
[close]
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Eric P on April 08, 2009, 03:04:41 PM
if you've never liked anything he's done, then my guess is that this won't really change your mind.

in my case, i was never a huge star trek fan. i know ENOUGH about the stuff and have watched a few of the key episodes and read a few books Fnord Chan suggested over on GAF, but it never really stuck with me.

so i'm willing to view this on its own merits.

Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Eric P on April 08, 2009, 03:07:52 PM
The original Star Trek mostly sucked, so I can't really be nostalgic.  Next generation, however, was mostly quality.

i used to think that but then i went through and watched some of it on spike and was kind of appalled.  entertaining, yes, but i wouldn't really call it "good" per se.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: TVC15 on April 08, 2009, 03:09:18 PM
Best since Wrath of Khan.  yeah, we'll see about that...  ::)

I'm also sick of people underplaying The Final Frontier.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Howard Alan Treesong on April 08, 2009, 03:11:13 PM
if you've never liked anything he's done, then my guess is that this won't really change your mind.

in my case, i was never a huge star trek fan. i know ENOUGH about the stuff and have watched a few of the key episodes and read a few books Fnord Chan suggested over on GAF, but it never really stuck with me.

Did you read The Final Reflection and How Much for Just the Planet?

:bow John M. Ford :bow2

RIP :'(

I hated Alias, I think LOST is stupid seat-of-the-pants fanwank, Cloverfield was one of the worst movies I've paid to see in a cinema. M-I:3 was okay, but just okay. I dunno if there's anything else JJ should be judged on.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Eric P on April 08, 2009, 03:12:31 PM
yeah, those are the two he had me read and they were fucking sex bob-omb.

never watched alias, couldn't get into lost, LOVED cloverfield but he only produced that, and didn't see m-i:3
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: TVC15 on April 08, 2009, 03:13:57 PM
if you've never liked anything he's done, then my guess is that this won't really change your mind.

in my case, i was never a huge star trek fan. i know ENOUGH about the stuff and have watched a few of the key episodes and read a few books Fnord Chan suggested over on GAF, but it never really stuck with me.

Did you read The Final Reflection and How Much for Just the Planet?

:bow John M. Ford :bow2

RIP :'(

I hated Alias, I think LOST is stupid seat-of-the-pants fanwank, Cloverfield was one of the worst movies I've paid to see in a cinema. M-I:3 was okay, but just okay. I dunno if there's anything else JJ should be judged on.

Jesus you are so critical.  You haven't even seen his defining work, Felicity. 
spoiler (click to show/hide)
Felicity's hair is the smoke monster
[close]
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Cheebs on April 08, 2009, 03:15:08 PM
Well there is reason to get excited the past few days. Regular media reviews have started to come out (not just the fanboys who saw it with Nimoy) and they seem to love the shit out of it as well.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: TVC15 on April 08, 2009, 03:17:18 PM
I think I would have liked Cloverfield if it were like a television movie.  If it were a TV episode or some sort of scifi original, it would have been inventive, but as a bit theater picture it was really underwhelming and boring.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Veidt on April 08, 2009, 03:21:29 PM
I've only ever, bought one Blu-ray. And that one is Cloverfield.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Howard Alan Treesong on April 08, 2009, 03:27:24 PM
yeah, those are the two he had me read and they were fucking sex bob-omb.

If you haven't read it yet, get John M. Ford's short story collection (Heat of Fusion). Soooo many astounding stories in there.

http://www.amazon.com/Heat-Fusion-Other-Stories-John/dp/031285546X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1239214995&sr=1-1

His small press collection (From the End of the 20th Century) is also great, but start with Heat of Fusion.

http://www.amazon.com/End-Twentieth-Century-John-Ford/dp/0915368730/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1239214951&sr=8-3

So fucking sad we will never see the end of the Alterneties stories - shady corporation finds a preexisting human-sized network connecting hundreds of alternate worlds; travels to them, subjugates them, reopens them as tourist attractions. Then there's a big earthquake at Ouray, CO where Alternaties HQ is located, and everything gets all broken, disconnected, and otherwise fucked up. The existing stories are kind of a mixture of Philip Jose Farmer's "everything goes" Riverworld scenario with interesting period stories with a SF twist.

Maybe one day someone will find a manuscript or outline of the remaining stories. :(
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: ManaByte on April 09, 2009, 07:58:17 PM
[youtube=560,345]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZddhJTYOAWw[/youtube]
[youtube=560,345]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ScDgaZRR7i8[/youtube]
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Cheebs on April 09, 2009, 08:03:39 PM
Apparently Nimoy & Lindeolf came up with that idea themselves and had to convince Paramount to let them do it.

Nimoy always has come across as a nice guy, a lot more down-to-earth than say Shatner.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Dickie Dee on April 10, 2009, 02:08:00 AM
I think I would have liked Cloverfield if it were like a television movie.  If it were a TV episode or some sort of scifi original, it would have been inventive, but as a bit theater picture it was really underwhelming and boring.
Cloverfield was ok...also long as it you downloaded it and watched it on your computer. It worked pretty well in that context. Even renting as a DVD I think I would've been disappointed.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Phoenix Dark on April 10, 2009, 02:39:18 AM
The original Star Trek mostly sucked, so I can't really be nostalgic.  Next generation, however, was mostly quality.

I'm no Trek fan but NG was a good show. Back in the day on saturday mornings I'd wake up real early and sneak downstairs in anticipation of my favorite cartoons. I'd always get down there around 6am, at which point Golden Girls would come on, then NG. :bow
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: ManaByte on April 22, 2009, 07:25:56 PM
http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117940096.html?categoryid=31&cs=1

Quote
Blasting onto the screen at warp speed and remaining there for two hours, the new and improved “Star Trek” will transport fans to sci-fi nirvana. Faithful enough to the spirit and key particulars of Gene Roddenberry’s original conception to keep its torchbearers happy but, more crucially, exciting on its own terms in a way that makes familiarity with the franchise irrelevant, J.J. Abrams’ smart and breathless space adventure feels like a summer blockbuster that just couldn’t stay in the box another month. Paramount won’t need any economic stimulus package with all the money it’ll rake in with this one globally, and a follow-up won’t arrive soon enough.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/film-reviews/film-review-star-trek-1003964428.story

Quote
Paced at warp speed with spectacular action sequences rendered brilliantly and with a cast so expert that all the familiar characters are instantly identifiable, the film gives Paramount Pictures a new lease of life on its franchise.

Fans of the "Star Trek" saga will be delighted to see Capt. Kirk (Chris Pine), Spock (Zachary Quinto), Bones (Karl Urban) and all the others in the early part of their lives as the Starship Enterprise takes its maiden voyage. The film is so much fun, however, that it will draw in moviegoers just looking for a sensational ride. The boxoffice should beam up enormous returns.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Cheebs on April 22, 2009, 07:28:36 PM
It's getting pretty much perfect reviews. Clearly is going to be a critical lovefest overall. I would be shocked if this finishes below 85% on RT.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: WrikaWrek on April 22, 2009, 07:35:25 PM
Some of the more level headed reviews seem to hit at a really strong opening, then the movie spends most of the time trying to juggle some not so impressive action with fan service, and a plot where a ton of shit moves but nothing actually happens.

MI 3 had all these cool reviews and hype, ended up being shit.

JJ Abrahams must know some secret sauce for critics.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Howard Alan Treesong on April 22, 2009, 07:37:57 PM
sigh, Star Trek Babies
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Cheebs on April 22, 2009, 07:44:03 PM
sigh, Star Trek Babies

?
 Actor's age:
Kirk = 29
Spock = 32
McCoy = 37
Scotty = 39
Uhura = 31
Sulu = 37
Chekov =20

Only Chekov would be a baby. 30's = babies?
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Cheebs on April 22, 2009, 07:45:38 PM
Some of the more level headed reviews seem to hit at a really strong opening, then the movie spends most of the time trying to juggle some not so impressive action with fan service, and a plot where a ton of shit moves but nothing actually happens.

MI 3 had all these cool reviews and hype, ended up being shit.

JJ Abrahams must know some secret sauce for critics.
Wha? MI 3 didn't get nearly as fantastic reviews as Trek is getting. Not even close.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Phoenix Dark on April 22, 2009, 07:46:53 PM
sigh, Star Trek Babies

?
 Actor's age:
Kirk = 29
Spock = 32
McCoy = 37
Scotty = 39
Uhura = 31
Sulu = 37
Chekov =20

Only Chekov would be a baby. 30's = babies?

*whoosh*
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Cheebs on April 22, 2009, 07:47:17 PM
sigh, Star Trek Babies

?
 Actor's age:
Kirk = 29
Spock = 32
McCoy = 37
Scotty = 39
Uhura = 31
Sulu = 37
Chekov =20

Only Chekov would be a baby. 30's = babies?

*whoosh*
Says the guy who predicted this would get bad reviews.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: ManaByte on April 22, 2009, 09:17:10 PM
[youtube=560,345]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8k_OEdIrLSs[/youtube]

 :bow :bow2
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Tucah on April 22, 2009, 09:40:34 PM
I've never seen anything Star Trek related but I'm pretty pumped for this.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: chronovore on April 22, 2009, 10:02:39 PM
I've never seen anything Star Trek related but I'm pretty pumped for this.

Conversely, I've seen a mess of them, but I'm /still/ hyped for this. Against historical evidence and all better judgment.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: ManaByte on April 30, 2009, 05:41:25 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDEJXdEcV7U
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Phoenix Dark on April 30, 2009, 05:46:48 PM
love how he immediately starts plugging his shitty products after watching the far sexier shitty product Abrams has in store for millions of people
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: The Fake Shemp on April 30, 2009, 05:47:22 PM
Star Trek sucks my balls.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Rman on April 30, 2009, 05:48:36 PM
Man, he's so bitter about not being included in the film.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Cheebs on April 30, 2009, 05:49:04 PM
Still is getting nothing but awesome reviews though. :bow

And yeah Shatner is so weird about this. I guess he is jealous of Nimoy.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Eric P on April 30, 2009, 05:49:43 PM
Still is getting nothing but awesome reviews though. :bow

And yeah Shatner is so weird about this. I guess he is jealous of Nimoy.

how do you think we got ST5?

jealous of nimoy
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Eel O'Brian on April 30, 2009, 05:53:11 PM
how can we convince obama to reopen gitmo for star trek fans

i am willing to pay extra taxes
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Tauntaun on April 30, 2009, 05:55:14 PM
love how he immediately starts plugging his shitty products after watching the far sexier shitty product Abrams has in store for millions of people

He is the SHAT!  :bow
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Cheebs on April 30, 2009, 05:58:00 PM
how can we convince obama to reopen gitmo for star trek fans

i am willing to pay extra taxes
uhhhh Obama is a self confessed Trekkie :-\
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Phoenix Dark on April 30, 2009, 05:59:21 PM
lock him up then. Give Biden a chance to shine
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Eel O'Brian on April 30, 2009, 06:00:52 PM
- plays the wii

- trekkie

jesus fucking christ i'm moving to canada
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Phoenix Dark on April 30, 2009, 06:01:42 PM
he also listens to Bob Dylan
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Eel O'Brian on April 30, 2009, 06:03:03 PM
third strike

reserving plane tickets now
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Tauntaun on April 30, 2009, 06:05:02 PM
third strike

reserving plane tickets now

Dude, it's cold up there.   :maf
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Cheebs on April 30, 2009, 06:05:11 PM
Nimoy said he met Obama at some dem. fundraiser before Obama hit it big and Obama went up to him and did the vulcan greeting.  :-\ Even as a Trek fan I could never bring myself to do that. What a loser.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Eric P on April 30, 2009, 06:07:09 PM
no wonder he doesn't love his country.  he's an alien

a BLACK alien
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Eel O'Brian on April 30, 2009, 06:07:49 PM
obama =

(http://www.videodetective.net/photos/004/000169_27.jpg)
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Eric P on April 30, 2009, 06:09:16 PM
(http://xenomorph.org/images/alientoy/big_bad_black_alien_front.jpg)
sup, dawg.  i be slangin' policy down the block.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Eel O'Brian on April 30, 2009, 06:15:26 PM
he's not black, he just lays out a lot

and watches STAR TREK on his IPOD while slurping a Skinny Cinnamon Dolce Latte from STARBUCKS when he isn't texting on his BLACKBERRY

ugh

malek i am sleeping on your couch

no funny stuff
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Eric P on April 30, 2009, 06:16:26 PM
to ensure that nothing happens, all you have to do is get him to fall in love with you
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Eel O'Brian on April 30, 2009, 06:19:00 PM
seriously, though, can we at least sterilize star trek fans
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Eric P on April 30, 2009, 06:27:35 PM
seriously, though, can we at least sterilize star trek fans

most of them are self sterilized by fact of being star trek fans
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Cheebs on April 30, 2009, 06:29:07 PM
Star Trek fans are the reason why even if I was waterboarded would refuse to admit to watching it.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Eel O'Brian on April 30, 2009, 06:30:44 PM
seriously, though, can we at least sterilize star trek fans

most of them are self sterilized by fact of being star trek fans

sadly, some slip through the cracks

(http://www.campblood.org/Other%20Stuff/hel22trekk.jpg)
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Cheebs on April 30, 2009, 06:37:35 PM
(http://farm1.static.flickr.com/133/396086946_0abac99b7d_o.jpg)
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Eric P on April 30, 2009, 06:38:03 PM
it's time to murder the planet
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: HyperZoneWasAwesome on April 30, 2009, 07:13:02 PM
Obama's REAL favorite show is The Wire.

Lets all chill now.  Lets just chillax.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Cheebs on April 30, 2009, 07:48:01 PM
Obama's REAL favorite show is The Wire.

Lets all chill now.  Lets just chillax.
He said the other week Entourage is now his favorite show.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: HyperZoneWasAwesome on April 30, 2009, 07:57:18 PM
He said the other week Entourage is now his favorite show.
I could rationalize like any good liberal and point out that they're not making any more episodes of The Wire and thus a change to a more current and active show is appropriate.
Or I could react like a conservative and call him a gutless flip-flopper with no principles and a socialist to boot.

CHOOSE YOUR ANSWER!
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: TVC15 on April 30, 2009, 07:59:22 PM
No Shatner, no sale.  Will maybe steal for Pegg action.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Mr. Gundam on April 30, 2009, 08:03:42 PM
(http://farm1.static.flickr.com/133/396086946_0abac99b7d_o.jpg)

What the fucking hell??!?

it's time to murder the planet

Nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: chronovore on April 30, 2009, 10:13:28 PM
Holy crap, is all that stuff about Takei? Is it just from the venom from Shatner's roast?
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Great Rumbler on April 30, 2009, 10:39:22 PM
Holy crap, is all that stuff about Takei? Is it just from the venom from Shatner's roast?

It came across as just as joke to me.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: chronovore on May 01, 2009, 01:20:05 AM
I recall that Shatner was, seriously, vehemently opposed to Takei having a captain's commission in one of the movies. He was supposed to have moved up, and Shatner blocked it because he didn't want to share the limelight. Takei really, really laid into him at the roast -- I suspect very little of it was exaggerated in his feelings for The Shat.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Cheebs on May 01, 2009, 01:40:07 AM
Everyone except DeForest Kelley and Leonard Nimoy hated Shatner. Those 3 were very very close pals but the rest couldn't stand Shatner.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Bloodwake on May 01, 2009, 01:56:16 AM
Okay, in honor of a new Star Trek coming out, I'm going to watch the trailer for the first time.

And, I like Trek, so fuck off. I've never dressed up or anything, but I like Trek. A lot.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: chronovore on May 01, 2009, 02:37:52 AM
Man, do you like commas or what? I'm pretty sure most of the people participating in this thread are Trek fans. I've never dressed up either, but I bought a burgundy TNG singlet for my first kid, which has probably forever scarred her.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Himu on May 01, 2009, 02:49:50 AM
Can't wait for this movie.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Cheebs on May 01, 2009, 09:39:00 AM
And, I like Trek, so fuck off. I've never dressed up or anything, but I like Trek. A lot.
Same, you can be a Trek fan without being a "Trekkie".

I have never been to a convention and would die before I would be caught dead at one. And I don't know any Klingon and wouldn't want to know any of it.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Bloodwake on May 01, 2009, 02:43:45 PM
I actually dressed up once though, but I was in middle school. I don't think that counts. It would be similar to me dressing up as Batman for halloween.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: ManaByte on May 02, 2009, 05:26:54 PM
Just got the soundtrack. It's AWESOME.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Diunx on May 02, 2009, 05:57:25 PM
EB hates Star Trek so much that I'm downloading the first season of the original show right now.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Great Rumbler on May 02, 2009, 07:00:36 PM
EB hates Star Trek so much that I'm downloading the first season of the original show right now.

I watched Balance of Terror on Bluray the other day.  :hyper
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Bloodwake on May 04, 2009, 02:50:02 PM
Rolling Stone's Peter Travers gives it 3 1/2 stars.

The more positive feedback, the more anxious I get. It MAY actually be good!
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Cheebs on May 04, 2009, 03:21:08 PM
Rolling Stone's Peter Travers gives it 3 1/2 stars.

The more positive feedback, the more anxious I get. It MAY actually be good!
I'm not surprised. It is getting the best reviews for a blockbuster since The Dark Knight.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Bloodwake on May 04, 2009, 03:38:55 PM
Yep, and unlike the usual EB response, I actually LIKED the Dark Knight.

Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Cyanista on May 04, 2009, 03:41:16 PM
I loved Star Trek, the original series and The Next Generation.  I watched it with my mom, and also I'm just a huge nerd. 

I am scared they are going to hollywood this movie to the point I have a Stupid Sexy Flanders moment after leaving the theater and drive my car into a ditch.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Bloodwake on May 04, 2009, 04:02:06 PM
I loved Star Trek, the original series and The Next Generation.  I watched it with my mom, and also I'm just a huge nerd. 

I am scared they are going to hollywood this movie to the point I have a Stupid Sexy Flanders moment after leaving the theater and drive my car into a ditch.

Honestly, that's my fear, but

- the added sex factor fits in the TOS spirit
- this is only going to add to the continuity rather than "relaunch" the franchise, meaning that the forty plus years of TV and movies aren't being canned
- it looks pretty good
- it's highly reviewed

At this point, I expect it to be at least better than Nemesis, which was a steaming pile of dogshit. I don't expect it to be better than The Wrath of Khan, First Contact, or Undiscovered Country, at least without not watching it first.
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: chronovore on May 07, 2009, 11:07:57 AM
The only Trek movie worse than NEMESIS is that crappy Kirk vs. God one that The Shatner directed. Was that ST 5?
Title: Re: Star Trek Trailer
Post by: Eric P on May 07, 2009, 11:09:13 AM
with sexy 60 year old uhura's fan dance