THE BORE

General => The Superdeep Borehole => Topic started by: Kestastrophe on March 09, 2009, 05:22:46 PM

Title: The next generation of graphics?
Post by: Kestastrophe on March 09, 2009, 05:22:46 PM
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123655461519565819.html?mg=com-wsj (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123655461519565819.html?mg=com-wsj)

Quote from: WSJ
Caustic Graphics Inc., plans to exploit a technique called ray-tracing that generates extremely accurate three-dimensional images. Ray-tracing is a mainstay of Hollywood studios, but remains out of reach for most PC users. A single image can take hours to generate; rendering a film can take months on hundreds of server systems.

Computer games and other PC software typically rely on a technology called rasterization. Though the results keep getting more realistic, developing an interactive form of ray-tracing has been a longtime quest in the computer industry.

Caustic, whose name refers to light rays reflecting off a curved object, says it is close to achieving that goal. The company says its software and chips allow graphics chips to carry out ray-tracing calculations at a 20-fold speed-up compared with existing PC hardware. It said it expects to deliver chips by early 2010 that will be about 200 times faster.

In a demonstration, Caustic executives manipulated a photo-quality image of a sports car, removing components and changing lighting and background settings to change reflections on the vehicle's surface.

"It's the first honest acceleration of ray-tracing I've seen," said Jon Peddie, a market researcher in Tiburon, Calif., who specializes in graphics technology.

Hopefully someone with knowledge/insight will chime in on this ray-tracing vs. rasterization blah blah blah

Also:
Quote from: WSJ
Mr. McCombe expects accelerator cards using its chips to cost about the same as existing graphics accelerators, adding that its circuitry eventually could be combined with graphics chips.
Smothe Groove annihilated