Hopefully this will get New York to pass concealed-carry laws. It's crazy that people can just be slaughtered like sheep and not be allowed to defend themselves.I don't want to get into a second amendment fight, but I'm sure that NY has a bigger problem with mugging murderers than with hostage murderers. Although these situations always get more attention.
Hopefully this will get New York to pass concealed-carry laws. It's crazy that people can just be slaughtered like sheep and not be allowed to defend themselves.
It would have...
It would have...
Lol yeah cause life is just like a counter strike match. Dumbass.
In texas somebody would have shot that fucker faster than you can say brady bill
Lol yeah cause life is just like a counter strike match. Dumbass.
In texas somebody would have shot that fucker faster than you can say brady bill
Lol yeah cause life is just like a counter strike match. Dumbass.
In texas somebody would have shot that fucker faster than you can say brady bill
One friend, Edward Perkovic, said Poplawski feared "the Obama gun ban that's on the way" and "didn't like our rights being infringed upon."smh
Lol yeah cause life is just like a counter strike match. Dumbass.
In texas somebody would have shot that fucker faster than you can say brady bill
About 80 people were in the restaurant at the time. During the shooting, Hennard approached Suzanna Gratia Hupp and her parents. Hupp had actually brought a handgun to the Luby's Cafeteria that day, but had left it in her vehicle due to the laws in force at the time, forbidding citizens from carrying firearms. According to her later testimony in favor of Missouri's HB-1720 bill[1] and in general [2][3], after she realized that her firearm was not in her purse, but "a hundred feet away in [her] car", her father charged at Hennard in an attempt to subdue him, only to be gunned down; a short time later, her mother was also shot and killed. (Hupp later expressed regret for abiding by the law in question by leaving her firearm in her car, rather than keeping it on her person[1].)
So isolated incidents where people go apeshit with these things is enough not to trust people?
Concealed Carry saved multiple lives in this instance:
http://www.wkyc.com/news/local/story.aspx?storyid=110522&provider=top
I could link to half a dozen more that have occurred in Ohio since we passed the law. This is just the most recent one.
AlohaDawg wrote:The story doesn't even mention that the robber had a gun. I'm guessing that the owner just saved a few hundred dollars that day, not anybody's life. Maybe you should link some of the other stories?
Big Scotty, that is the exact attitude that well educated and informed gun owners hate the most. If you are waiting for the chance to shoot someone, give up your gun because there is a lot more to responsible gun ownership than willingness to shoot. People who respect and defend the right to bear arms should also respect life and understand that any taking of life is tragic, even if it is justifiable. It should always be absolutely the last resort.
I myself own two handguns, a rifle and a shotgun, but I don't think I should be allowed to carry them wherever the fuck I want and conceal them.
Why is it that every fucking tragedy has to be seen principally through the lense of idiotic political views? Can't you fucking idiots just realize that that something horrific happened and dwell on that for a moment.
Yeah, easy access to guns sure helped those cops in Pittsburgh today who were responding to a domestic disturbance call and got shot down by a gun nut who was afraid that Obama was gonna take his guns.
I am for some speech control. I don't need to have free speech, and neither does anyone else. Waiting periods, competency tests, and safety instruction should all be required to speak freely. If you're not an impatient, distinguished mentally-challenged klutz then you'll have no problem getting free speech.
that has to be the most distinguished mentally-challenged analogy ever
I am for some speech control. I don't need to have free speech, and neither does anyone else. Waiting periods, competency tests, and safety instruction should all be required to speak freely. If you're not an impatient, distinguished mentally-challenged klutz then you'll have no problem getting free speech.
Fucking idiot.
I am for some speech control. I don't need to have free speech, and neither does anyone else. Waiting periods, competency tests, and safety instruction should all be required to speak freely. If you're not an impatient, distinguished mentally-challenged klutz then you'll have no problem getting free speech.
Fucking idiot.
I am for some speech control. I don't need to have free speech, and neither does anyone else. Waiting periods, competency tests, and safety instruction should all be required to speak freely. If you're not an impatient, distinguished mentally-challenged klutz then you'll have no problem getting free speech.
I am for some speech control. I don't need to have free speech, and neither does anyone else. Waiting periods, competency tests, and safety instruction should all be required to speak freely. If you're not an impatient, distinguished mentally-challenged klutz then you'll have no problem getting free speech.
Fucking idiot.
that has to be the most distinguished mentally-challenged analogy ever
aren't you glad you didn't have to wait three days to type that out?
now, don't you wish that anyone could buy a gun that easily?
i would buy guns from amazon and have them overnighted with my Prime membership and then no one would fuck with me.