Green Shinobi. Why?
- Gets annihilated anytime he says more than a couple of sentences (sometimes less). Kosma at least can write a couple of paragraphs without finding himself skewered.
- Kosma takes his annihilation in stride. Green Shinobi throws a fit and then runs to other threads whining about how the people who own him suck.
- Kosma's misguided but well meaning optimism vs. Green Shinobi's angry cuntery.
I voted Kosma, even though self-interest would point me towards GS. I think it's a toss-up between the two, though.
I voted Kosma, even though self-interest would point me towards GS. I think it's a toss-up between the two, though.
To be fair, one could argue that your case was a bit of a dual-annihilation. GS get wiped, but you spent an awful lot of time in the mudpit in order to get to that point. Kosma either does it all by himself, or contributes so much that the annihilating forces tend to remain clean and proper.
(No subject)
by: Green Shinobi
on: Today at 06:06:34 PM
I hope you fall ass-first on a chainsaw, you dog-sodomizing piece of shit.
--
GS annihilated.
Yes, Rebiak, I just sent you a PM. Go ahead and post it, fucktard.
And T EXP, I could take a drill to every fucking lobe in my brain and still have more functioning brain cells than you.
As far as I can tell, GS is still seething with rage, and there is certainly still a stink of rotten self-righteousness about his person.
:lol
This is why I voted for Green Shinobi.
:piss :greenshinobi :piss2
Short-bus riding piece of shit calls me a distinguished mentally-challenged fellow? BrandNew could fuck his sister, and their offspring could fuck for ten subsequent generations, and those kids wouldn't be half as distinguished mentally-challenged as your dumb ass.
Its funny that I actually agreed with GS on the drug thread and with Kosma in the Polanski one, but no ones gives a shit, wait, is not funny is sad :'(spoiler (click to show/hide)I also like muse :shh[close]
T EXP, you are the most worthless poster on this forum. I could feed my dog a bowl of Alphabet Soup, and he would crap better posts than what you write.
I'm too cool to hate.
I'm too forgettable to hate.
If I had ever actually been annihilated, I'm sure I'd be able to laugh it off.
I'd still get pretty angry at being called a distinguished mentally-challenged fellow within the first few posts.
I also think no-knock warrants are unconstitutional.
When have I ever lost any argument to Willco? Have you seen the fool he's making of himself in the Avatar thread?
Boogie, you're a fucking Canadian. Leave discussions of the U.S. constitution to people who actually live in the U.S.
When have I ever lost any argument to Willco? Have you seen the fool he's making of himself in the Avatar thread?
Edit:
Boogie, you're a fucking Canadian. Leave discussions of the U.S. Constitution to U.S. citizens.
Boogie, you're a fucking Canadian. Leave discussions of the U.S. Constitution to U.S. citizens.
Boogie, if you could somehow go back in time to the late 1700's and ask the founding fathers of the U.S. Constitution whether they believed that heavily-armed police should be able to forcefully enter a private residence without warning and use military tactics to intimidate and subdue private citizens who were merely suspected of engaging in illegal activity and who had no prior record of violent crimes, what do you think they would say?
Yeah, putting Methodis in the same poll as Green Shinobi is an insult to... Kosma?
Umm, we can make educated guesses based on the evidence at hand (like the stuff that these people actually wrote). Please tell me that's not your standard for trying to infer something that might not be readily apparent.
Everyone who doubted James Cameron.
on mere suspicion
You're a joke, Boogie. The constant jolts from horseback riding have ruined your brain like a Mongol girl's hymen.
I'm not the one who repeatedly abuses legal terminology whilst having no idea what they mean.
Yes, I have no idea what the U.S. Constitution is. When I minored in Political Science, we never once went over that.
Yeah, putting Methodis in the same poll as Green Shinobi is an insult to... Kosma?:rofl
How did I misuse it? Can the case against anyone where there is no hard evidence be considered anything more than mere suspicion? You're a joke.
N/m, Malek summed it up perfectly. Except that I believe their intent is discoverable in many cases.
(1) A justice who is satisfied by information on oath in Form 1 that there are reasonable grounds to believe that there is in a building, receptacle or place
(a) anything on or in respect of which any offence against this Act or any other Act of Parliament has been or is suspected to have been committed,
(b) anything that there is reasonable ground to believe will afford evidence with respect to the commission of an offence against this Act or any other Act of Parliament, or
(c) anything that there are reasonable grounds to believe is intended to be used for the purpose of committing any offence against the person for which a person may be arrested without warrant,
may at any time issue a warrant under his hand authorizing a person named therein or a peace officer,
(d) to search the building, receptacle or place for any such thing and to seize it, and
(e) subject to any other Act of Parliament, to, as soon as practicable, bring the thing seized before, or make a report in respect thereof to, the justice or some other justice for the same territorial division in accordance with section 489.1 .
Yeah, except Malek says they're NOT unconstitutional.
You've already lost the same argument before, and you're doing pretty good right now, so I don't think that's a real question.
Pretty sure I'm annihilating Boogie at the moment, but you've always been known to display ridiculous biases and a general close-mindedness.
I have said that I agree with the use of no-knock warrants when there is a good reason for them (i.e. the suspect has a history of violent crime, is known to possess firearms, etc).
When a judge signs a warrant authorizing a search, that search can be carried out in a number of ways. It can be carried out with a knock on the front door and a contingent of police officers who then enter the premises in a nonviolent manner,
or it can be carried out by a team in riot gear that breaks down the front door with a battering ram
and uses military tactics to subdue everyone in the dwelling place before searching for whatever it is they're looking for.
What Malek is saying is that the latter method is used in some cases where "exigent circumstances" are very loosely applied.
Furthermore, no matter what "reasonable grounds" there are to believe that someone is committing a crime, he is still just a suspect until proven guilty in a court of law.
Pretty sure I'm annihilating Boogie at the moment,
You know what, I'll admit it. Boogie rebuffed my arguments pretty well. His arguments were based on absolute facts.
Pretty sure I'm annihilating Boogie at the moment,
why did my name get mentioned by you green shinobi? fuck ya
Let's not forget one of the most awesomely nonsensical posts of all time ever: "They exist because they do." Mandark pretty well twisted JayDubya into a pretzel of logical dumbness in that thread and he's yet to recover.
I annihilated you pretty badly also.
Edit: although thinking about it , you know it does kind of suck being put in the same category as GS and Methodis. I'd always though I was more of the court jester type of poster.Sorry about that. I think you're one of the best posters on the forum :-*
Can I get a link to this melt value thread?
How are you not in this poll for your self-annihilation in the Avatar thread anyway?I'm not saying Willco sank his own battleship in that thread -- because I got bored and stopped following it -- but I will say that this poll is more about embarrassing one's self repeatedly, perhaps even habitually. Liars, drama queens, zealots, and people who believe imaginary social constructs would work out just fine if only we were all allowed to just look after our own interests without interference from government tend to fall into that role.
The only thing more amazing then Green Shinobi's ability to self-annihilate is his inability to win recognition for it, which somehow further cements his mastery.
Oh shut the fuck up. No one has ever come close to annihilating me on this forum. When Mandark twists JayDubya into a complete logical gridlock, that is annihilation. I've never been subjected to anything even close to that.That wasn't about you, it was about FoC. It isn't always about you. Here, let me say it again: It isn't always about you. Which is the key component in how you are a self-annihilation masterpiece.
And chronovore, where do you get the idea that I'm a libertarian? I'm a pretty hardcore progressive, except for my stance on drugs.
Maybe I'm just an old-timer here, but back in my day if we wanted to annihilate someone, we had to actually prove him wrong on something, or really make him look like an idiot.We couldn't just string any random words together and then yell "annihilated!" like you people seem to want to do. We would certainly never claim that someone was annihilated when an argument ended in a stalemate, but we happened to agree with one side more than the other.:-X
Yes, because you're a fucking idiot.
Holy fuck GS you really need to take a break from here.
I hope you keep to your word.
I'm gonna like GS from now on just because all you guys hate him, and you're all faggots.
smh, the resistance is awesome.
smh, the resistance is awesome.
but duckman introduced us to mini ninjas. :bow2
Diunx had a GS-type fit after I put him on ignore, so I guess there's a connection there. :teehee
Seriously though, Green Shinobi may be annoying but he's not nearly as bad as Methodis, FoC, or Kosma.
Holy fuck GS you really need to take a break from here.
I hope you keep to your word.
He's already proven pathologically incapable of doing so. It's a shame, cause he could be a decent poster if he didn't have an OCD need to "defend his intelligence" or whatever. It's the internet, brah- I've been called stupid by 13 year old idiot children and some of the time they were likely right. Roll with the fucking punches you big fucking baby.
Himuro and PD belong on the list more than Kosma I think, but I didn't read the Polanski thread.
wait so cajole is the third icon? i nominate myself and kosma as replacement panties heros, because we get the most action here, married posters included :smug
wait so cajole is the third icon? i nominate myself and kosma as replacement panties heros, because we get the most action here, married posters included :smug
panties hero isnt because you get laid, lol.
panties hero isnt because you get laid, lol.
panties hero isnt because you get laid, lol.
well it should be
Maybe I'm just an old-timer here,
Congrats, Boogie. Whatever I think of you as a poster, which isn't much, I do respect the fact that you work in a dangerous profession that involves putting your life on the line for the public.
He's a masochist.
I took a 24 hour break and got some much-needed perspective.
I plan to change my posting style, but why would I stop arguing something I believe in just because some idiot says "annihilated" after my opponent posts?
Fuck off, chronovore.
Boogie, the Fifth Amendment gives Americans the right to be free of unreasonable searches and seizures. There is nothing reasonable about one's door being smashed in and a squad of armed officers entering with drawn weapons, UNLESS there is a damned good reason for it. If someone has a violent record, then a no-knock search could be warranted. If someone has no record, then a no-knock search is not reasonable at all, end of story. The possibility that someone might flush drugs down the toilet doesn't justify using such extreme tactics against private citizens.
Because if I think that the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures means that police shouldn't be able to break down your front door and point a pistol at your head on mere suspicion when you have no record of violent crimes, but you disagree, then surely going back and trying to agree upon the intent of the Founding Fathers when they wrote that particular Constitutional Amendment would help us resolve this argument in a more productive manner.
on mere suspicion
You're a joke, Boogie. The constant jolts from horseback riding have ruined your brain like a Mongol girl's hymen.
I'm not the one who repeatedly abuses legal terminology whilst having no idea what they mean
Yes, I have no idea what the U.S. Constitution is. When I minored in Political Science, we never once went over that.
spoiler (click to show/hide)and are you that dense, or just being obtuse, thinking that I was referring to the US Constitution, and not your repeated misuse of terminology like "mere suspicion"?[close]
How did I misuse it? Can the case against anyone where there is no hard evidence be considered anything more than mere suspicion? You're a joke.
Show me whatever relevant American law section allows a judge to authorize a search warrant. If that section puts the legal basis for a search warrant as "mere suspicion", I'll post pictures of my dick.
Ichirou, what is your opinion on no-knock searches?
Boogie, I'm not arguing against the searches themselves. I'm arguing about the manner in which these searches are carried out. My only argument is that searches should be announced unless the suspect has a violent record.
You're getting into Willco-esque strawman territory here, Boogie.
He took 24 hours off, bro! CHILL!
Until someone has been proven guilty in a court of law, he or she is nothing more than a suspect. That's where my language comes from. I'm not denying that there might be evidence against that person.
But are you going to tell me that there has never been a case where a search was carried out, but the police found nothing?
I understand how warrants work.
The possibility that someone might flush drugs down the toilet doesn't justify using such extreme tactics against private citizens.Then how would police ever arrest drug dealers?
You're just jealous none of us want your simple ass.
no, powerslave is a gibbering pale moron. the only reason anyone tolerates him is because he's a harmless kind of unfunny, like the jean-jacketed scrawny poor kid shrieking at the football studs. well, until now, apparently. i prefer we kept him around as a sort of validation of icon awesomeness.
You're just jealous none of us want your simple ass.
You know I got more fans (do you even have any hehehe) than you here, chump :smug
lol, Shinobi is an EB addict.He has good taste when it comes to forums
Until someone has been proven guilty in a court of law, he or she is nothing more than a suspect. That's where my language comes from. I'm not denying that there might be evidence against that person. But are you going to tell me that there has never been a case where a search was carried out, but the police found nothing?
Green Shinobi- Arrested Development meltdown
Green Shinobi is a Lakers fan, he deserves it.QuoteGreen Shinobi- Arrested Development meltdown
what was this about?
Fuck off, chronovore.
Boogie, the Fourth Amendment gives Americans the right to be free of unreasonable searches and seizures. There is nothing reasonable about one's door being smashed in and a squad of armed officers entering with drawn weapons, UNLESS there is a damned good reason for it. If someone has a violent record, then a no-knock search could be warranted. If someone has no record, then a no-knock search is not reasonable at all, end of story. The possibility that someone might flush drugs down the toilet doesn't justify using such extreme tactics against private citizens.
Christ, lock this piece of shit thread.
serious question though. If you get rid of the drugs and the distributors, then you get rid of the financing for all of the drug murders, smuggling, turf wars etc. so it's actually pretty important for public safety to catch them with their stash by using a no-knock warrant.The possibility that someone might flush drugs down the toilet doesn't justify using such extreme tactics against private citizens.Then how would police ever arrest drug dealers?
The Number of the Beast is a better album than Powerslave anyway.
I'm not going to argue this right now, but I will say that there is no way you could ever get rid of all the drugs and distributors. No way. It will never happen unless demand for the drugs disappears. I agree that drug abuse is a big problem, but the way we go about fighting it right now is deeply flawed.That doesn't matter. You remove 1 million dollars of drugs and you'll remove one million dollars from the criminals' payroll. It's about the money which pays for the crime. Police wouldn't care about drugs if people just got high and didn't bother regular taxpayers.
(http://www.batterseapowerstation.org.uk/news/rumgay/We%20Love%20the%20Iraqi%20Information%20Minister_files/07-minister.jpg)
"I have not been annihilated!"
http://www.evilbore.com/forum/index.php?PHPSESSID=7lbd80uav4pi5kc0jufv7bqq03&topic=32864.msg1001924#msg1001924I've only been back like a week and you've already been annihilated more times than I can count.
Links?
Hey numb nuts, you're annihilated because we say your annihilated. Stop trying to look for objective criteria for this shit. If literally everyone on the forum recognizes your annihilation, then there has been a failure to integrate on your part, and the communities standards 'aint changing just for precious little you.
Green Shinobi's favorite movie must be Mortal Kombat: Annihilation.
The last hour of Aliens isn't 'his favorite movie' you idiot. He said it was his favorite last hour of a movie ever in cinema.
The last hour of Aliens isn't 'his favorite movie' you idiot. He said it was his favorite last hour of a movie ever in cinema.
try not to take the bait so much, lest you end up on this list next year
Aliens is one of the rare films in the 100% club at Rotten Tomatoes. Just putting that out there so you guys have more material to annihilate me.
Yeah, that's about as bad when FlameOfCallandor - the film school graduate - said Return of the Jedi was one of his favorite movies ever.
Aliens is one of the rare films in the 100% club at Rotten Tomatoes. Just putting that out there.
Aliens is one of the rare films in the 100% club at Rotten Tomatoes. Just putting that out there so you guys have more material to annihilate me.
Aliens is one of the rare films in the 100% club at Rotten Tomatoes. Just putting that out there.
Yes, because an aggregated score from a film released prior to when the Internet archived reviews from major publications is an accurate look at critical reception upon release. I highly doubt a paper or reputable critic is going to spend the time and money to retype or find an old review that panned a highly-popular film from 20 years ago.
:lolWow, it's like you completely missed my point. :lol
All those quotes are from the year of its release, dude.
The only reason we're having this distinguished mentally-challenged conversation is because I said that the final hour of Aliens is my favorite hour of cinema.
Aaaaawwwww guys :heart
I came back to the forum to vote for GS.:bow
Hello EB.
Seriously, did you fuck that girl from the flogging the log thread? I can't sleep or eat now.:lol
I came back to the forum to vote for GS.
Hello EB.