THE BORE

General => Video Game Bored => Topic started by: Nintendosbooger on January 11, 2010, 03:23:53 PM

Title: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Nintendosbooger on January 11, 2010, 03:23:53 PM
Below are the metacritic scores of the top 10 Gamecube and Wii third-party console exclusives. When adding up the score, you’ll notice that the Wii comes well ahead of the GC in terms of quality third party video game.

I’ve omitted and added a number of games, including Resident Evil 4 for the Gamecube (which wasn’t a third party GC exclusive in the previous generation, as it arrived on the PS2) and PGA Tour 10 Wii ( which was so fundamentally different from the other versions, that I consider it a Wii exclusive on the strength of its unique features).

Anyway, here are the games and their metacritic scores:

GC
Resident Evil – 91
Super Monkey Ball 2 – 87
Super Monkey Ball 1 - 87
Tales of Symphonia – 86
MGS: Twin Snakes – 85
Resident Evil Zero – 83
Final Fantasy: Crystal Chronicles – 80
Pacman Vs. - 78
Battalion Wars - 76
Baten Kaitos Origins - 75

Avg Score: 82.8


Wii
World of Goo – 94
Resident Evil 4: Wii – 91
Tiger Woods PGA Tour 10 - 88
Zack & Wiki – 87
Little King’s Story – 87
LostWinds: Winter of Melodias – 86
Boom Blox Bash Party – 86
Boom Blox – 85
No More Heroes – 83
Dead Space Extraction – 82

Avg Score: 86.9

That's pretty damn impressive considering the Wii is still in its infancy and the gaming press is biased against the system.

EDIT: Removed VJ from the GC list. I forgot it came out for the PS2. Added BW.
EDIT 2: Removed Ikaruga from the GC list. Added BK: 0
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Third on January 11, 2010, 03:28:04 PM
You placed RE4 on the wrong system.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Flannel Boy on January 11, 2010, 03:30:08 PM
Wii: Better third Party Exclusives than the GameCube!

Malek: talking to more girls than Arvie!

That's pretty damn impressive considering the Wii is still in its infancy

I think you're confusing the conole with the console's fanbase.  :drake

Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Nintendosbooger on January 11, 2010, 03:35:47 PM
You placed RE4 on the wrong system.


I didn't. RE4 came out for the Playstation 2, as well, so it wasn't really a third party console exclusive. RE4 Wii, however, was a game completely tailored for the Wii, much in the same way PGA Tour 10 was, and hasn't seen multiple consoles this generation, so, essentially, it's a Wii third party exclusive.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: dark1x on January 11, 2010, 03:37:38 PM
You placed RE4 on the wrong system.


I didn't. RE4 came out for the Playstation 2, as well, so it wasn't really a third party console exclusive. RE4 Wii, however, was a game completely tailored for the Wii, much in the same way PGA Tour 10 was, and hasn't seen multiple consoles this generation, so, essentially, it's a Wii third party exclusive.
It is NOT completely tailored for the Wii.  The Wii additions are simply bolted on.  It's not even a particularly well thought out control scheme.  It was a port, plain and simple.  Counting it as a Wii game and not a GC game is bullocks.

Including it basically negates your whole topic as well as it demonstrates that you are taking a harder stance against the Gamecube in favor of the Wii.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Third on January 11, 2010, 03:37:52 PM
No it isn't. It's still the same game.

And...

http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/cube/eternaldarkness?q=eternal%20darkness

Eternal Darkness - 92

For the Gamecube.

Gamecube>>>>Wii

Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: demi on January 11, 2010, 03:38:35 PM
:lol Suddenly waggle means its a brand new game
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: MCD on January 11, 2010, 03:40:25 PM
impressive post as usual nintendosbooger, keep up the good work.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: duckman2000 on January 11, 2010, 03:40:29 PM
So who is going to start the daily PS3 and 360 threads?
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Don Flamenco on January 11, 2010, 03:41:27 PM
um, the Wii edition is the PS2 version with waggle added in.  :lol  

This is low, even for a NB thread. Averages of game rankings scores with games selectively added/removed...epic troll is epic.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Third on January 11, 2010, 03:42:01 PM
nvm
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Flannel Boy on January 11, 2010, 03:43:28 PM
Is there a reason you omitted Star Wars Rogue Squadron II: Rogue Leader. It is shitty, but according to your god, metacritic, it averaged a 90.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: demi on January 11, 2010, 03:43:41 PM
How is Wii in its infancy? It's been out for almost 4 years.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Nintendosbooger on January 11, 2010, 03:44:05 PM
No it isn't. It's still the same game.

And...

http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/cube/eternaldarkness?q=eternal%20darkness

Eternal Darkness - 92

For the Gamecube.

Gamecube>>>>Wii



ED doesn't count as SK was second party at the time. I'm talking third party games here.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: tiesto on January 11, 2010, 03:46:23 PM
Meh, I liked Skies of Arcadia Legends, Baten Kaitos: Origins, and Tales of Symphonia a helluva lot more than most Wii 3rd party games.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Nintendosbooger on January 11, 2010, 03:47:51 PM
Is there a reason you omitted Star Wars Rogue Squadron II: Rogue Leader. It is shitty, but according to your god, metacritic, it averaged a 90.

Factor 5 was SECOND party. Learn to read.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Flannel Boy on January 11, 2010, 03:48:51 PM
The game was published by LucasArts.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: demi on January 11, 2010, 03:50:01 PM
What's a second party?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_game_development_parties
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: duckman2000 on January 11, 2010, 03:51:27 PM
WTF is "second party," anyway? Third party under contractual obligation? Sounds like a third party with a first party publisher to me.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Third on January 11, 2010, 03:52:24 PM
The only thing this thread confirms is the shitty third party situation for both Nintendo consoles.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: magus on January 11, 2010, 03:53:48 PM
can i mention little king story and how much awesome it is for the 13569th time?  :)
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Nintendosbooger on January 11, 2010, 03:54:25 PM
:lol Suddenly waggle means its a brand new game

I never said that.

RE4 was multiplatform last gen; however, RE4, with motion control, is exclusive to the Wii this generation. The added "waggle" functionality doesn't make it a NEW game per say but it's damn near close and critics have proclaimed that it's more than just a port. In the event that it is released for the PS3/Xbox360, with motion controls, then it can be considered a multiplatform title this gen.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Flannel Boy on January 11, 2010, 03:55:44 PM
The 25th ranked wii game on metacritic is Super Paper Mario, at an average score of 85.
The 25th ranked GC game on metacritic is Tiger Woods PGA, at an average score of 90.

Numbers don't lie.

The 50th ranked wii game on metacritic is Strong Bad's Cool Game for Attractive People Episode 4: Dangeresque 3: The Criminal Projective, sounds awesome, at an average score of 81.
The 50th ranked GC game on metacritic is Super Monkey Ball, at an average score of 87.

Wait? WTF am I doing?

Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Don Flamenco on January 11, 2010, 03:58:25 PM
The 25th ranked wii game on metacritic is Super Paper Mario, at an average score of 85.
The 25th ranked GC game on metacritic is Tiger Woods PGA, at an average score of 90.

Numbers don't lie.

The 50th ranked wii game on metacritic is Strong Bad's Cool Game for Attractive People Episode 4: Dangeresque 3: The Criminal Projective, sounds awesome, at an average score of 81.
The 50th ranked GC game on metacritic is Super Monkey Ball, at an average score of 87.

Wait? WTF am I doing?




Yes, but you haven't adjusted for second party companies, exclusivity, and one other category I'm forgetting...oh yeah, distinguished mentally-challenged agenda.  That last one really changes things around.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Nintendosbooger on January 11, 2010, 03:59:17 PM
Even if we were to add Rogue Leader, which I'm not for reasons stated above, it won't make much of a difference. The Wii is still ahead of the GC in avg score.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: bork on January 11, 2010, 04:01:08 PM
:lol Suddenly waggle means its a brand new game

I never said that.

RE4 was multiplatform last gen; however, RE4, with motion control, is exclusive to the Wii this generation. The added "waggle" functionality doesn't make it a NEW game per say but it's damn near close and critics have proclaimed that it's more than just a port. In the event that it is released for the PS3/Xbox360, with motion controls, then it can be considered a multiplatform title this gen.

No it isn't.  It's the same game, but you have the option to use the Wii controller for aiming and shooting much like you would a mouse on a PC.  What critics have "proclaimed that it's more than just a port?"  Or rather, which Nintendo fan site said this crap?  It's a port.  I would say it's the overall best version of RE4, but I also have never played the PC version (with all its patches available).
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Howard Alan Treesong on January 11, 2010, 04:03:06 PM
So the Wii is ahead of the GC, except when it isn't? Which is always, according to the numbers? Got it. P.S. Numbers don't lie.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Nintendosbooger on January 11, 2010, 04:05:09 PM
The 25th ranked wii game on metacritic is Super Paper Mario, at an average score of 85.
The 25th ranked GC game on metacritic is Tiger Woods PGA, at an average score of 90.

Numbers don't lie.

The 50th ranked wii game on metacritic is Strong Bad's Cool Game for Attractive People Episode 4: Dangeresque 3: The Criminal Projective, sounds awesome, at an average score of 81.
The 50th ranked GC game on metacritic is Super Monkey Ball, at an average score of 87.

Wait? WTF am I doing?



You can't do it that way, you dumb fuck. The GC list would be top heavy with all the first party Nintendo releases during the full length of the GC lifespan, pushing more of the other decent games down. The Wii hasn't been around as long. That method would only work when comparing their libraries in TOTALITY at the end of the Wii's lifecycle. My method works better.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Howard Alan Treesong on January 11, 2010, 04:06:34 PM
The 25th ranked wii game on metacritic is Super Paper Mario, at an average score of 85.
The 25th ranked GC game on metacritic is Tiger Woods PGA, at an average score of 90.

Numbers don't lie.

The 50th ranked wii game on metacritic is Strong Bad's Cool Game for Attractive People Episode 4: Dangeresque 3: The Criminal Projective, sounds awesome, at an average score of 81.
The 50th ranked GC game on metacritic is Super Monkey Ball, at an average score of 87.

Wait? WTF am I doing?



You can't do it that way, you dumb fuck. The GC list would be top heavy with all the first party Nintendo releases during the full length of the GC lifespan, pushing more of the other decent games down. The Wii hasn't been around as long. That method would only work when comparing their libraries in TOTALITY at the end of the Wii's lifecycle. My method works better.

truly, you're methodis impressive
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Robo on January 11, 2010, 04:08:03 PM
Leper this imbecile already.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: bork on January 11, 2010, 04:08:30 PM
I like that the top three Wii titles are all multiplatform. 

Nintendobooger, it's time for this shit to stop.  Keep your crap in one single thread.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Third on January 11, 2010, 04:08:58 PM
The Wii has almost three times the userbase of the Gamecube, and yet the Wii is doing worse support wise.
Wow, pretty terrible.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Nintendosbooger on January 11, 2010, 04:14:30 PM
:lol Suddenly waggle means its a brand new game

I never said that.

RE4 was multiplatform last gen; however, RE4, with motion control, is exclusive to the Wii this generation. The added "waggle" functionality doesn't make it a NEW game per say but it's damn near close and critics have proclaimed that it's more than just a port. In the event that it is released for the PS3/Xbox360, with motion controls, then it can be considered a multiplatform title this gen.

No it isn't.  It's the same game, but you have the option to use the Wii controller for aiming and shooting much like you would a mouse on a PC.  What critics have "proclaimed that it's more than just a port?"  Or rather, which Nintendo fan site said this crap?  It's a port.  I would say it's the overall best version of RE4, but I also have never played the PC version (with all its patches available).

Not fansites. Magazines, big sites claiming that the Wii functionality adds a new dimension to the game.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: bork on January 11, 2010, 04:15:03 PM
I like that you can't name any of them.  Not that it matters, because that is bullshit.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Phoenix Dark on January 11, 2010, 04:16:08 PM
Quote
Resident Evil 4: Wii – 91
:rofl
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Nintendosbooger on January 11, 2010, 04:17:34 PM
No More Heroes is being released for the 360/PS3. Or since those ports aren't out yet it doesn't count?

They come out at the end of February, I believe, so it's still a Wii exclusive at this point. It won't change the avg score much once NMH2 is released exclusively for the Wii (which will blow the first installment away).
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Howard Alan Treesong on January 11, 2010, 04:18:34 PM
:lol Suddenly waggle means its a brand new game

I never said that.

RE4 was multiplatform last gen; however, RE4, with motion control, is exclusive to the Wii this generation. The added "waggle" functionality doesn't make it a NEW game per say but it's damn near close and critics have proclaimed that it's more than just a port. In the event that it is released for the PS3/Xbox360, with motion controls, then it can be considered a multiplatform title this gen.

No it isn't.  It's the same game, but you have the option to use the Wii controller for aiming and shooting much like you would a mouse on a PC.  What critics have "proclaimed that it's more than just a port?"  Or rather, which Nintendo fan site said this crap?  It's a port.  I would say it's the overall best version of RE4, but I also have never played the PC version (with all its patches available).

Not fansites. Magazines, big sites claiming that the Wii functionality adds a new dimension to the game.

Apparently that "new dimension" was the MINUS WORLD - minus 5, to be exact. Numbers = reality.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Nintendosbooger on January 11, 2010, 04:20:12 PM
I like that you can't name any of them.  Not that it matters, because that is bullshit.

I don't have the quotes saved or fucking bookmarked, but I'll try to find them later.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Howard Alan Treesong on January 11, 2010, 04:23:06 PM
I like that you can't name any of them.  Not that it matters, because that is bullshit.

I don't have the quotes saved or fucking bookmarked, but I'll try to find them later.

Run a filter on (Wii Score < GameCube Score), and those bookmarks will filter up to the top.

Not only do numbers not lie, they make great sorting algorithms.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Nintendosbooger on January 11, 2010, 04:29:05 PM
Quote from: Synthesizer Patel

Apparently that "new dimension" was the MINUS WORLD - minus 5, to be exact. Numbers = reality.

There are reasons behind every score. If I recall correctly, it got a lower score as a result of the graphics, which wasn't up to the gaming media's HD standards. Plus, as stated in the OP, Wii games have a harder obstacle to overcome as a result of the gaming media's bias against the Wii itself, but even taking that into account, its games edge out those of the GC among these reviewers, which is an amazing feat.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Howard Alan Treesong on January 11, 2010, 04:31:23 PM
Quote from: Synthesizer Patel

Apparently that "new dimension" was the MINUS WORLD - minus 5, to be exact. Numbers = reality.

There are reasons behind every score. If I recall correctly, it got a lower score as a result of the graphics, which wasn't up to the gaming media's HD standards. Plus, as stated in the OP, Wii games have a harder obstacle to overcome as a result of the gaming media's bias against the Wii itself, but even taking that into account, its games edge out those of the GC among these reviewers, which is an amazing feat.

So we both agree that games on the Wii are handicapped from the start? Good to know.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Howard Alan Treesong on January 11, 2010, 04:41:53 PM
8-bit fanwank!

Mega Man 9 Wii: 83
Mega Man 9 Xbox 360: 82
Mega Man 9 PS3: 77

I guess Wii owners liked it more because it looked like the graphics they're used to. :smug
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Nintendosbooger on January 11, 2010, 04:50:09 PM
Had the MP Trilogy and Pikmin been released with HD graphics, they would have scored A LOT higher. That is fact. Mega Man 9 is a very rare incident (you wouldn't be able to name 10 examples EXACTLY like that), but my theory is that since it was an 8-bit game, graphics never was a factor (as it really shouldn't be) in the scores.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: demi on January 11, 2010, 04:51:28 PM
Had Pikmin and Trilogy been released in HD I might actually like them... more
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Nintendosbooger on January 11, 2010, 04:57:07 PM
Had Pikmin and Trilogy been released in HD I might actually like them... more

That is precisely my point. Precisely! Re-release the game with motion controls and significantly improved graphics, and you'll see the Wii version score higher than the original.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: demi on January 11, 2010, 04:59:36 PM
Well then I guess Nintendo shouldn't have bottlenecked the industry
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Howard Alan Treesong on January 11, 2010, 05:03:11 PM
I think this is like those Gross Box Office Receipts Adjusted for Inflation movie ticket comparisons. Since the Wii has low-res SD graphics all games automatically get a point multipler of 1.3 (this constant is derived from the inverse log of the pixel fill diference between 480p and 720p, a.k.a. "reviewer's tilt")
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Great Rumbler on January 11, 2010, 05:16:10 PM
What is this metacritic? Real fanthings use GameRankings.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: pilonv1 on January 11, 2010, 05:20:43 PM
this is amazing
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: T234 on January 11, 2010, 05:35:24 PM
Soul Calibur(DC) is better than any game on any Nintendo platform since the SNES.

It fucks Nintendooosbooger in the face and ass nightly whilst screaming "NINTHINGS AND ROCKSTAR ROBBED ME! I SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THAT LIST, NOT THE OVERWROUGHT DRIVEL THAT 'NEW GAMES JOURNALISM' JACKS OFF TO EVERY NIGHT!"
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Nintendosbooger on January 11, 2010, 05:51:04 PM
Soul Calibur(DC) is better than any game on any Nintendo platform since the SNES.

It fucks Nintendooosbooger in the face and ass nightly whilst screaming "NINTHINGS AND ROCKSTAR ROBBED ME! I SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THAT LIST, NOT THE OVERWROUGHT DRIVEL THAT 'NEW GAMES JOURNALISM' JACKS OFF TO EVERY NIGHT!"

The fuck are you talking about? No one brought up Soul Calibur or the DC until your dumb ass came rumbling into this thread. You're probably a Sega fan piece of shit still butthurt that the company is now spreading its legs for other console manufacturers. Who mentions the Dreamcast these days, anyway?
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: T234 on January 11, 2010, 05:54:10 PM
Soul Calibur(DC) is better than any game on any Nintendo platform since the SNES.

It fucks Nintendooosbooger in the face and ass nightly whilst screaming "NINTHINGS AND ROCKSTAR ROBBED ME! I SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF THAT LIST, NOT THE OVERWROUGHT DRIVEL THAT 'NEW GAMES JOURNALISM' JACKS OFF TO EVERY NIGHT!"

The fuck are you talking about? No one brought up Soul Calibur or the DC until your dumb ass came rumbling into this thread. You're probably a Sega fan piece of shit still butthurt that the company is now spreading its legs for other console manufacturers. Who mentions the Dreamcast these days, anyway?



[youtube=560,345]uijnGTq4wgI[/youtube]
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Crushed on January 11, 2010, 05:59:56 PM
Quote
NMH2 is released exclusively for the Wii (which will blow the first installment away).

please remove - timed exclusivity only. The other hilarious thing is that there are NO WAGGLE CONTROLS in NMH2.

I think the message is clear : we will complete out contractual obligation for a timed exclusive follow up but this series is now a next gen affair.


uh, previews have said that nmh2 uses the same control scheme, complete with waggle.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Crushed on January 11, 2010, 06:00:54 PM
delete evilbore, it's been ruined forever now
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Saint Cornelius on January 11, 2010, 06:06:24 PM
:bow Nintendosbooger :bow

Nintendobooger, it's time for this shit to stop.  Keep your crap in one single thread.

Srsly you need to stop with the sub GAf moderation style. If there's something in the ToS about how people can only make one Nintendo related thread per 24 hours, you'd have a point, but as it stands you're just a crybaby. The server isn't going to implode from all of Nintendosboogers' posts.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Crushed on January 11, 2010, 06:07:27 PM
Quote
uh, previews have said that nmh2 uses the same control scheme, complete with waggle.

really? i'd seriously heard that they had totally removed waggle.

Suda said that he saw Monster Hunter 3's popularity so he added in a Classic Controller scheme for 2.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Nintendosbooger on January 11, 2010, 06:07:59 PM
Quote
You're probably a Sega fan piece of shit still butthurt that the company is now spreading its legs for other console manufacturers

There's a company , can't remember which one, who've been importing Sega's blue mascot thingy into a ton of their games to help boost sales... which company is that again?

I can almost hear the begging... "PLEASE let us use your character, we've run out of creativity :( :( :("



Is this a joke? Nintendo is the only reason Sega is still afloat. Look at the sales of those Mario/Sonic olympic threads. That's all Nintendo. Sega's upcoming Mario Kart ripoff will undoubtedly end up in the bargain bin along with Bionic Commando.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Saint Cornelius on January 11, 2010, 06:13:00 PM
Is this a joke? Nintendo is the only reason Sega is still afloat. Look at the sales of those Mario/Sonic olympic threads. That's all Nintendo. Sega's upcoming Mario Kart ripoff will undoubtedly end up in the bargain bin along with Bionic Commando.


Hey hey hey, now wait a second pal :livid
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: iconoclast on January 11, 2010, 06:14:51 PM
Quote
You're probably a Sega fan piece of shit still butthurt that the company is now spreading its legs for other console manufacturers

There's a company , can't remember which one, who've been importing Sega's blue mascot thingy into a ton of their games to help boost sales... which company is that again?

I can almost hear the begging... "PLEASE let us use your character, we've run out of creativity :( :( :("



Is this a joke? Nintendo is the only reason Sega is still afloat. Look at the sales of those Mario/Sonic olympic threads. That's all Nintendo. Sega's upcoming Mario Kart ripoff will undoubtedly end up in the bargain bin along with Bionic Commando.

why'd you edit Crystal Bearers out?
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: demi on January 11, 2010, 06:15:21 PM
Because it's a Squeenix game... those dont bargain bin
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: iconoclast on January 11, 2010, 06:20:54 PM
Beside Last Remnant of course.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: demi on January 11, 2010, 06:24:55 PM
Beside Last Remnant of course.

Sales tactic. Less price, more sales. Deserving for a unique and perfect Gem such as TLR.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Human Snorenado on January 11, 2010, 06:30:46 PM
Is this a joke? Nintendo is the only reason Sega is still afloat. Look at the sales of those Mario/Sonic olympic threads. That's all Nintendo. Sega's upcoming Mario Kart ripoff will undoubtedly end up in the bargain bin along with Bionic Commando.


Hey hey hey, now wait a second pal :livid

lol u mad now
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Saint Cornelius on January 11, 2010, 06:34:05 PM
I might have to amend my feelings towards Nintendosbooger.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: AdmiralViscen on January 11, 2010, 06:49:50 PM
This is the shittiest first post, and the best thread, yet. I started off thinking Booger needs to be stopped, but now I want him to redouble his efforts.

Also, good to know that Battalion Wars is third party and Rogue Squadron is not. Thanks for that.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Van Cruncheon on January 11, 2010, 06:51:13 PM
I think this is like those Gross Box Office Receipts Adjusted for Inflation movie ticket comparisons. Since the Wii has low-res SD graphics all games automatically get a point multipler of 1.3 (this constant is derived from the inverse log of the pixel fill diference between 480p and 720p, a.k.a. "reviewer's tilt")

i do not support this methodology as it helps rather than punishes hd game developers that use a smaller-than-native frame buffer
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: duckman2000 on January 11, 2010, 06:51:32 PM
Also, good to know that Battalion Wars is third party and Rogue Squadron is not. Thanks for that.

Yeah, dude just avoided the second-party thing after it was questioned. Are we sure this isn't just MAF trolling us all?
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: AdmiralViscen on January 11, 2010, 06:54:38 PM
Is it possible to create some kind of inverse leper, where the user would be able to make all the threads they want but they can't post outside of them? I'd like that very much.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: TakingBackSunday on January 11, 2010, 06:55:46 PM
:bow Wii :bow2
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Great Rumbler on January 11, 2010, 06:57:22 PM
I don't get what the purpose of this thread is supposed to be.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Howard Alan Treesong on January 11, 2010, 06:59:33 PM
I think this is like those Gross Box Office Receipts Adjusted for Inflation movie ticket comparisons. Since the Wii has low-res SD graphics all games automatically get a point multipler of 1.3 (this constant is derived from the inverse log of the pixel fill diference between 480p and 720p, a.k.a. "reviewer's tilt")

i do not support this methodology as it helps rather than punishes hd game developers that use a smaller-than-native frame buffer

u ma-
d?
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Rman on January 11, 2010, 07:10:02 PM
NB's threads sure do move.  I'll give him that.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Purple Filth on January 11, 2010, 07:36:14 PM
Seriously, whose alt is this?
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: recursivelyenumerable on January 11, 2010, 10:48:36 PM
We all must do our part to conserve the earth's rapidly dwindling pixel supply.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Olivia Wilde Homo on January 11, 2010, 11:01:28 PM
Seriously, whose alt is this?

The dude has been at it at GAF since 2004 or 2005.  It probably isn't an alt because it would be amazing for a joke-shtick character not to get revealed in 5 years time.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Trent Dole on January 11, 2010, 11:33:21 PM
LEPER
THIS
FILTH
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Sho Nuff on January 12, 2010, 02:30:30 AM
 :o Nintendosbooger not being an alt
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: etiolate on January 12, 2010, 02:42:03 AM
I think this list shows how underrated GC games were. Public Nintendo backlash for shaaaame.  Where's SoA: Legends? Best version of one of the best 3d era RPGs, if not THEE best one.

There's no god damned F Zero either. Capcom, Sega, Namco and EA all profited nicely from me due to the GC.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Nintendosbooger on January 12, 2010, 03:26:46 AM
I think this list shows how underrated GC games were. Public Nintendo backlash for shaaaame.  Where's SoA: Legends? Best version of one of the best 3d era RPGs, if not THEE best one.

There's no god damned F Zero either. Capcom, Sega, Namco and EA all profited nicely from me due to the GC.

Glad you brought this up. F-Zero is a first party IP, so that doesn't count. SoA: Legends was not console exclusive in that gen as it wasn't fundamentally different from the original on the same level as RE4Wii was from RE4(GC).

As for BW being on the GC third party list, I accidentally copy/pasted the wrong game, but it doesn't make a difference as the remaining third party exclusives ranked under 80. The outcome wouldn't have changed.

But anyway, I'm tired of my threads getting shitted on by random anti-Nintendo fanboys/bitches, especially considering all the work and research I put into most of these, so I'm going to stop shilling the Wii itself for now since the sales numbers speak for themselves and focus more on Wii software.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: duckman2000 on January 12, 2010, 04:08:31 AM
Or you could just stop trying so damned hard. You're not exactly the only one here with an agenda and preference, but I can't think of anyone else who is this rigid and forceful, and who regularly lays out their own very narrow plans for the forum.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: dark1x on January 12, 2010, 07:38:23 AM
Quote
as it wasn't fundamentally different from the original on the same level as RE4Wii was from RE4(GC).
There's nothing fundamentally different about RE4 on the Wii.  Christ, it's the same game with a different control scheme.  So how do you even explain PC games?  You can use any number of different crazy devices and control schemes for PC games.  Doesn't mean they become different games.

The controls in RE4 Wii were slapped in and it just so happens that a lot of people took to it, for some reason.  They really weren't all that good.

I don't see how you can keep World of Goo on the Wii list, though.  It's a PC game as well.  I suppose it shouldn't be surprising that the best scoring 3rd party Wii title is actually a PC game.  :D

The Gamecube still had a better library overall, though.  It doesn't matter what excuses you attempt to make for the Wii, but the Gamecube was superior.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Himu on January 12, 2010, 08:06:27 AM
We need a Sony lunatic as well. Altogether is too calm and objective.

Altogether's not even a big Sony freak. Last gen he preferred Xbox over ps2. He's a fake.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: EmCeeGrammar on January 12, 2010, 09:17:22 AM
Good god,  I hate all nintendo fans now.  This is weird.  I can't find one other sane dude who likes the wii on the whole fucking internet.  ugggghghghghghghghghghgh
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Third on January 12, 2010, 10:44:28 AM
I propose a name change.

Nintendosturd.

Nintendoshooker fits his persona more.

He brings more balance to this board, though. There are way too many Wii haters in here. ( which is understandable)
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Don Flamenco on January 12, 2010, 10:51:59 AM
Good god,  I hate all nintendo fans now.  This is weird.  I can't find one other sane dude who likes the wii on the whole fucking internet.  ugggghghghghghghghghghgh

I like the wii.  I just have fun trolling :shh   of course, I don't fit the "sane" requirement.


Quote
The controls in RE4 Wii were slapped in and it just so happens that a lot of people took to it, for some reason.  They really weren't all that good.


Finally, someone who agrees with me on this.  I feel like I'm going crazy when people say it's a great use of Wii controls.  It felt extremely cumbersome to me.  and now that I have a Classic Controller Pro, there's just no competition.   
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Human Snorenado on January 12, 2010, 11:02:09 AM
I wanted to change his name to Shiggy's Cum Dumpster, but I was vetoed.   :'(
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: magus on January 12, 2010, 11:13:40 AM
ehy i like the wii,do i need to make inane thread and call everybody a HD bots to get some recognizition  >:(
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: Crushed on January 12, 2010, 11:52:16 AM
RE4 Wii's controls are definitely superior and more accurate. I actually tried Mercenaries and the shooting galleries in both GC and Wii one after the other to compare, and in the Wii version I consistently got a higher score (easily blowing past the scores I struggled to reach over months of RE4 GC playing) and more headshots despite everything else being the same.
Title: Re: Nintendo Wii has better third party games than the GC (Numbers)
Post by: duckman2000 on January 12, 2010, 12:12:42 PM
He brings more balance to this board, though.

We don't have a whole lot of platform specific threads in general. The board isn't exactly drowning in "Xbox 360 in 2010: The Beginning" or "Playstation 3 first party catalog: a list" threads, that format seems more at home on GAF.