THE BORE

General => The Superdeep Borehole => Topic started by: The Dark Shake 3000 on April 16, 2010, 05:03:59 AM

Title: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: The Dark Shake 3000 on April 16, 2010, 05:03:59 AM
As alluded to in the Obama thread I crashed the tea party protest in midtown Manhattan yesterday, and had my camera with me. Shot a bunch of angry white people with wacky signs, heard a lot of grumbling about socialism and how "the government needs to be overrun" and what have you.

The video: http://vimeo.com/10973296 (http://vimeo.com/10973296)

An angry white person:

(http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4048/4524777491_2768048c81.jpg)

:usacry :punch :usacry
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Phoenix Dark on April 16, 2010, 05:25:03 AM
Great video+song selection

Were there any pro-Obama folks out there getting in arguments lol?
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: ToxicAdam on April 16, 2010, 05:37:35 AM
Nice editing in sync with the cool music. That GEICO parody sign was pretty funny though.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Ichirou on April 16, 2010, 06:18:18 AM
Great editing, man.  Loved it.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Kestastrophe on April 16, 2010, 08:03:08 AM
Nice video. Whenever they have local teaparties here, I feel compelled to take a sign:

(http://i41.tinypic.com/ddknc9.jpg)

(http://i41.tinypic.com/ohk09.jpg)
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Cormacaroni on April 16, 2010, 08:41:54 AM
:lol
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Cheebs on April 16, 2010, 09:22:32 AM
wow that was good.  :lol

shake to be a director of political documentaries?
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: The Fake Shemp on April 16, 2010, 09:33:33 AM
What makes me laugh about the Tea Party - when you get to the core - is that they believe this man hijacked the Presidency and is not listening to them. Everything he is doing is what Obama campaigned on! In fact, as someone who has voted for him, he is doing LESS than what he promised! And he won!

It's not like he said, "I'm going into office to pursue a libertarian agenda and downsize government!" and then went, "Hah, fooled you! I'm going to try and produce health care reform and facilitate better diplomatic relations with foreign countries! Viva la resistance!"
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Joe Molotov on April 16, 2010, 09:35:28 AM
He tricked people into believing he was an American citizen and not a muslim.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Cheebs on April 16, 2010, 09:37:27 AM
They reacted the same way to Bill Clinton creating endless theories about him to discredit him but to a far lesser extent (no internet to spread and create freaky scandals and organize groups, with internet I wouldn't be surprised if it was near tea party levels).

they simply can't accept they can ever lose.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: tiesto on April 16, 2010, 12:33:21 PM
Great music! I drove past the local tea party in Suffolk, and just like I expected, it was a bunch of old white people and my friend Colin (a Ron Paul/Alex Jones fanboy).
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Mr. Gundam on April 16, 2010, 12:37:32 PM
Did you see any Tea Partiers that weren't white?
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: The Fake Shemp on April 16, 2010, 12:37:45 PM
Did you see any Tea Partiers that weren't white?

:rofl
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Mr. Gundam on April 16, 2010, 12:40:03 PM
Did you see any Tea Partiers that weren't white?

:rofl

Hey now, they have to exist! Because they're not racist...

Right?
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Tauntaun on April 16, 2010, 12:40:15 PM
(http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k36/SlinkyT82/Dave_Chapelle_Show_-_Black_White_Su.jpg)
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Robo on April 16, 2010, 12:40:40 PM
Those lemonparty posters are brilliant.  :lol
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Brehvolution on April 16, 2010, 12:48:41 PM
Awesome job shake!
What was the mood like? It always seems to me that it's just a republican sore loser party.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Diunx on April 16, 2010, 01:23:25 PM
Can someone explain to me what this tea party shit is? is it angry white people that don't want their taxes to help the dirty poor?
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Mr. Gundam on April 16, 2010, 01:34:50 PM
Can someone explain to me what this tea party shit is? is it angry white people that don't want their taxes to help the dirty poor?

Bunch of people who feel that Obama and the government in general are taking the country in the wrong direction and going against the constitution. But, what you said is pretty much spot on.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: HyperZoneWasAwesome on April 16, 2010, 02:52:05 PM
that was pretty awesome.  Well done sir.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Eel O'Brian on April 16, 2010, 03:10:52 PM
i would explain my situation and why a lot of this stuff is going to leave me more  screwed than i am right now, but it's pretty obvious none of you would really give a fuck and it would just be a waste of my time

Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Mandark on April 16, 2010, 03:13:37 PM
I love ya Eel, but how many of your posts boil down to "some hypothetical future event will prove you all to be assholes and/or hypocrites"?
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: BlueTsunami on April 16, 2010, 03:26:39 PM
Eel O'daumus
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: The Dark Shake 3000 on April 16, 2010, 03:28:50 PM
I literally remember seeing ONE black tea partier, couldn't make out any others in a sea of white faces. :teehee

There weren't any major confrontations as far as a I could see, but there was one group of anti tea party folks (with the "blame Wall Street" signs) who started to antagonize the tea partiers by chanting that they're all racist, homophobic morons. :lol That mainly just caused a lot of yelling and some mild arguments. Nothing too serious.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Brehvolution on April 16, 2010, 03:31:28 PM
i would explain my situation and why a lot of this stuff is going to leave me more  screwed than i am right now, but it's pretty obvious none of you would really give a fuck and it would just be a waste of my time


In what way bro? I'll listen.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Smooth Groove on April 16, 2010, 03:32:19 PM
Shake, what kind of tea were they drinking?  Hot Twinings or cold Snapple?
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Brehvolution on April 16, 2010, 03:33:07 PM
Probably TWA Tea
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: The Dark Shake 3000 on April 16, 2010, 03:35:56 PM
No tea of any kind :'(
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Mr. Gundam on April 16, 2010, 03:53:36 PM
i would explain my situation and why a lot of this stuff is going to leave me more  screwed than i am right now, but it's pretty obvious none of you would really give a fuck and it would just be a waste of my time


In what way bro? I'll listen.

Yeah, I'd also be willing to listen.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Mandark on April 16, 2010, 03:55:09 PM
Let's get some cheesecake and talk this shit out!
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Eel O'Brian on April 16, 2010, 04:11:47 PM
i know this because i'm the one writing the checks

i'm just saying that between all the fist-pumping and back-slapping you should all maybe consider that some of this -will- affect certain people adversely, and maybe everyone who sees what's coming for them and is a little upset by it isn't a racist or even very political otherwise

let me break it down for you monetarily

i made 24260 last year, down about 5k from 2008

out of that amount around 7000 was legit expense, bringing my net to 17260

between state and fed i owed 3200, leaving me with 14060 for the year, around 1172 a month to pay rent/utilities/eat/etc. - 293 a week

midway through last year when i saw how it was heading i made a conscious decision - i can either save for taxes and live like a dog, or i can eat, so i chose to eat

i joke about living like a fallout 3 scavenger, but that was certainly the case last year - everything i bought i sold something else to get, and between that and selling off things to make up for the taxes i'm just about out of things to sell

it's already trending the same way this year, so i can figure on a roughly equivalent income this year, and when the slowdown halts around here it'll probably stabilize around the 25k mark (basing this on having made less every year since 1998)

when the mandatory health bill kicks in, i won't be eligible for any business tax breaks because i am a self-employed sole proprietor (i am not eligible for a lot of assistances because of this), so i did some research and based on my income:

Quote
Beginning in 2014, you will receive tax credits to help afford insurance premiums in the new exchanges as well as assistance with deductibles and co-payments. According to your income and family size, the tax credits will  ensure you do not spend more than $1528.38 to $1952.93 on premiums. Your maximum out-of-pocket costs for deductibles and co-payments would be capped at 27% of the total cost.

going with the lower amount, that would then leave me with roughly 12532, around 1044 a month (give or take a few bucks either way) or 262.50 a week

so i'm gonna have to make another choice that year, to either pay the 1500 i definitely know i can't afford, or not pay it and take the 700-800 penalty i can't afford but have to anyway, and all the helpful links and wonderful graphs and statistics in the world explaining to me how this is really the greatest thing ever needs of the many etc. isn't going to change any of that

i normally stay out of the political threads, as far as the social/civil stuff goes i am with you all on most of it

but when i see a lot of things written here lately, and when it jumps out of the politics thread and into other areas, i just think to myself "Man, these people just really don't give a shit how this is gonna fuckhammer people like me, if i even try to comment and state my side of it i'm just gonna be jumped on as some sort of teabagger or labeled as selfish or whatever"

so give me a witty one-liner, tell me with a straight face that i am not going to end up extra fucked, and i'll be sure and chuckle over it while i'm grocery shopping at the dollar store this weekend
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Kestastrophe on April 16, 2010, 04:25:28 PM
so i'm gonna have to make another choice that year, to either pay the 1500 i definitely know i can't afford, or not pay it and take the 700-800 penalty i can't afford but have to anyway
Not sure if you know this or not, but you can pay estimates, which are periodic payments (I think its quarterly) instead of paying one lump sum or suffering fines. Your taxes sound high for your income, but I am not up on tax code the last few years. How are you doing your taxes?
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: The Fake Shemp on April 16, 2010, 04:27:16 PM
I think it should just be a single-payer system, end of story.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: HyperZoneWasAwesome on April 16, 2010, 04:29:14 PM
Yeah, Eel's taxes sound waaaay high for his income.  But when you're self employed things do tend to get awfully complicated.

Sorry brah.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Mr. Gundam on April 16, 2010, 04:31:30 PM
Yeah, his taxes sound ridiculously high for his income. Maybe have someone help you with writing more things off for the business?
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Smooth Groove on April 16, 2010, 04:39:31 PM
Eel, sorry to hear about your woes.  Is there something on Steam I can get you to make you feel better? 
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: pollo on April 16, 2010, 04:41:51 PM
so i'm gonna have to make another choice that year, to either pay the 1500 i definitely know i can't afford, or not pay it and take the 700-800 penalty i can't afford but have to anyway
Not sure if you know this or not, but you can pay estimates, which are periodic payments (I think its quarterly) instead of paying one lump sum or suffering fines. Your taxes sound high for your income, but I am not up on tax code the last few years. How are you doing your taxes?

He's not talking about estimated payments, he's talking about the cost of mandated healthcare.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Kestastrophe on April 16, 2010, 04:44:30 PM
so i'm gonna have to make another choice that year, to either pay the 1500 i definitely know i can't afford, or not pay it and take the 700-800 penalty i can't afford but have to anyway
Not sure if you know this or not, but you can pay estimates, which are periodic payments (I think its quarterly) instead of paying one lump sum or suffering fines. Your taxes sound high for your income, but I am not up on tax code the last few years. How are you doing your taxes?

He's not talking about estimated payments, he's talking about the cost of mandated healthcare.
What's your fucking point? I quoted the only part of his post I addressed.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: pollo on April 16, 2010, 04:53:23 PM
so i'm gonna have to make another choice that year, to either pay the 1500 i definitely know i can't afford, or not pay it and take the 700-800 penalty i can't afford but have to anyway
Not sure if you know this or not, but you can pay estimates, which are periodic payments (I think its quarterly) instead of paying one lump sum or suffering fines. Your taxes sound high for your income, but I am not up on tax code the last few years. How are you doing your taxes?

He's not talking about estimated payments, he's talking about the cost of mandated healthcare.
What's your fucking point? I quoted the only part of his post I addressed.

What you're quoting and your response made me think you misunderstood what he said. The 700-800 penalty he's referring to is the cost of not getting health insurance, not the penalty he pays from not making estimated payments.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Kestastrophe on April 16, 2010, 05:00:12 PM
O, you are correct, that's exactly what I thought  :lol. Sorry for the shitty tone in my post  :-\
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Mandark on April 16, 2010, 05:01:42 PM
I tend to think that Eel knows his onions when it comes to his own tax obligations.  He's living his life and we aren't.  Yeah it seems high at first glance, but assuming he's paying both the employer and employee halves of FICA, that's most of it right there.


i normally stay out of the political threads, as far as the social/civil stuff goes i am with you all on most of it

but when i see a lot of things written here lately, and when it jumps out of the politics thread and into other areas, i just think to myself "Man, these people just really don't give a shit how this is gonna fuckhammer people like me, if i even try to comment and state my side of it i'm just gonna be jumped on as some sort of teabagger or labeled as selfish or whatever"

so give me a witty one-liner, tell me with a straight face that i am not going to end up extra fucked, and i'll be sure and chuckle over it while i'm grocery shopping at the dollar store this weekend

That's what I'm talking about, man.  You get mad at everyone for hypothetically being snarky and dismissive towards your viewpoint after choosing not to share it.  Maybe you're right and everyone would be smug, empathy-devoid assholes about it, but maybe they wouldn't.  At least give them the chance, instead of calling them out on theoretical future cuntiness.


Though personally, I'd take the current bill over the status quo, knowing full well that it's gonna fuckhammer some people.  I just happen to know other people who are getting raped in the current system and stand to benefit a ton.  In the end I give them more weight cause I know them personally and because it involves not being able to get coverage for life-threatening diseases because they've got life-threatening diseases.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Cheebs on April 16, 2010, 05:05:10 PM
Can you get on the new govt program that is part of the bill for those who can't afford to purchase it?


I'd take the current bill over the status quo, knowing full well that it's gonna fuckhammer some people.  I just happen to know other people who are getting raped in the current system and stand to benefit a ton.  In the end I give them more weight cause I know them personally and because it involves not being able to get coverage for life-threatening diseases because they've got life-threatening diseases.
As hard as it to say to someone in Eel's position there is probably at least 5 people for everyone in his situation who is going to greatly benefit from this new program. It's not a great bill but it is going to help a ton of people. And the mandate is part of that element that will help.

I know a few people who will be tangibly helped by this bill and that makes everything worth it. Some may struggle to have to pay for insurance now that it is mandated that they otherwise would use for other things but that is just part of everyone doing their part, nothing comes completely free.

It isn't smug to be happy and proud of this program. I don't get why he sees it that way. We wouldn't be happy with it if it didn't help people. And this law helps people despite not being perfect.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Smooth Groove on April 16, 2010, 05:07:56 PM
O, you are correct, that's exactly what I thought  :lol. Sorry for the shitty tone in my post  :-\

:drake
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Mandark on April 16, 2010, 05:11:03 PM
It's kinda risky to go around with out insurance, what happens if you get cancer?  

...
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Smooth Groove on April 16, 2010, 05:12:23 PM
It's kinda risky to go around with out insurance, what happens if you get cancer?  

...

Ask your friends at GAF to start folding on their PS3s?
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Barry Egan on April 16, 2010, 05:15:00 PM
Can you get on the new govt program that is part of the bill for those who can't afford to purchase it?


I'd take the current bill over the status quo, knowing full well that it's gonna fuckhammer some people.  I just happen to know other people who are getting raped in the current system and stand to benefit a ton.  In the end I give them more weight cause I know them personally and because it involves not being able to get coverage for life-threatening diseases because they've got life-threatening diseases.
As hard as it to say to someone in Eel's position there is probably at least 5 people for everyone in his situation who is going to greatly benefit from this new program. It's not a great bill but it is going to help a ton of people. And the mandate is part of that element that will help.

I know a few people who will be tangibly helped by this bill and that makes everything worth it. Some may struggle to have to pay for insurance now that it is mandated that they otherwise would use for other things but that is just part of everyone doing their part, nothing comes completely free.

It isn't smug to be happy and proud of this program. I don't get why he sees it that way. We wouldn't be happy with it if it didn't help people. And this law helps people despite not being perfect.

Hate to break it to you, but you sound pretty smug. 
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: The Fake Shemp on April 16, 2010, 05:19:10 PM
The bill sucks, but I've said that all along.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Cheebs on April 16, 2010, 05:19:51 PM
Can you get on the new govt program that is part of the bill for those who can't afford to purchase it?


I'd take the current bill over the status quo, knowing full well that it's gonna fuckhammer some people.  I just happen to know other people who are getting raped in the current system and stand to benefit a ton.  In the end I give them more weight cause I know them personally and because it involves not being able to get coverage for life-threatening diseases because they've got life-threatening diseases.
As hard as it to say to someone in Eel's position there is probably at least 5 people for everyone in his situation who is going to greatly benefit from this new program. It's not a great bill but it is going to help a ton of people. And the mandate is part of that element that will help.

I know a few people who will be tangibly helped by this bill and that makes everything worth it. Some may struggle to have to pay for insurance now that it is mandated that they otherwise would use for other things but that is just part of everyone doing their part, nothing comes completely free.

It isn't smug to be happy and proud of this program. I don't get why he sees it that way. We wouldn't be happy with it if it didn't help people. And this law helps people despite not being perfect.

Hate to break it to you, but you sound pretty smug. 
I know people who will helped by this law, a lot of people in fact. And I don't think a real single expert (not us fake internet-politico's) on health care would argue more people will be in Eel's position over the position of people being helped by the law.

It sucks he has to pay for something he can barely afford, but that is not enough of a reason to not be happy with the overall benefits of the mandate and the law as a whole. It helps too many people. It is worth being happy about and proud that it got passed.

32 million more americans can get health care. That's worth the package.



The bill sucks, but I've said that all along.
It's not single payer which is the ideal. But its 1000x better than the status quo and is the best thing we could have gotten out of this current congress and we likely would have got nothing out of the next congress. It helps far too many people to just say it sucks.

I mean I had benefits from the govt job I was working full time last year. I left it and now getting my masters full time. Thanks to this law I am able to go back on my parents plan till I am finished in a year and get a job again. I have no reason to hate this law.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Mandark on April 16, 2010, 05:23:14 PM
Cheebs:  Without speaking for Eel* that seems like the exact sort of post that could drive someone in his situation nuts.  You're abstracting away some very real hardships on his part with phrases like "everyone doing their part" and "nothing comes completely free".

Then you dole out life advice like he's never thought of the pros and cons of having health insurance.  If that post were directed at me I'd find it pretty condescending.  Hell, I find it condescending anyway.


spoiler (click to show/hide)
This is one of those phrases that's only ever said as a lie, like "with all due respect".
[close]
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: The Fake Shemp on April 16, 2010, 05:24:53 PM
It's marginally better than the status quo. It has certain consumer protections in it that have been a long-time coming, but it's a disaster waiting to happen. It absolutely, positively does not address costs - which will go up - and it will be a burden on many.

The whole thing is not sustainable, and I gather we're heading for a massive trainwreck unless we institute a single-payer system, which is why I think this bill got passed - in hopes of fixing it before or after it hits critical mass.

It was a windfall for insurers and Big Pharma. Don't fool yourself that it was real reform.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: The Fake Shemp on April 16, 2010, 05:27:30 PM
I have no reason to hate this law.

This is distinguished mentally-challenged.

That's when I sit on my mountain of Jew gold while people are sitting in the unemployment line and say, "Hey, I love these tax cuts. I have no reason to hate them." :smug
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Smooth Groove on April 16, 2010, 05:29:07 PM
It's easy for Cheebs to be talking shit 'cause he's still living within the safe confines of college life.  While college ain't easy, there're still people looking out for you.  Out there, you're on your own.  
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Mandark on April 16, 2010, 05:29:35 PM
"I get to stay on my parents' health insurance while I pursue my masters, which they are also paying for.  This is why you, the guy getting fucked over to pay for it, should love this bill!"

Cheebs is putting on a clinic in tone deafness.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Crushed on April 16, 2010, 05:30:05 PM
You're abstracting away some very real hardships

American Politics 101
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Cheebs on April 16, 2010, 05:30:29 PM
How could the bill have been fixed to keep the mandate but ensure people don't end up in Eel's position and still pass though? I don't see how it would have been possible.

Single payer obviously, but that was not going to happen. We are stuck with the congress we had.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Kestastrophe on April 16, 2010, 05:36:20 PM
It absolutely, positively does not address costs - which will go up - and it will be a burden on many.
I thought the whole point of mandatory coverage was to increase the insurance pool, thus lowering costs? 
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Mandark on April 16, 2010, 05:40:05 PM
It's one thing to support a bill that will create winners and losers cause you think it's an overall net plus.

It's another thing to tell the losers that they should also like it, especially in a way that's dismissive of their grievances, especially in a way that treats them like simpletons ("what if you got cancer?"), especially by citing benefits to other people who already have it easier than them.

Just take a minute to read Eel's post and then read your posts.  You have to see it.



Kestastrophe:  It lowers costs for people who are already insured and paying lots cause of pre-existing conditions or age.  Willco's talking about the overall cost of health care and the growing chunk of the economy it represents.  I disagree with him, but that's what he's saying.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Cheebs on April 16, 2010, 05:42:04 PM
It's another thing to tell the losers that they should also like it, especially in a way that's dismissive of their grievances, especially in a way that treats them like simpletons ("what if you got cancer?"), especially by citing benefits to other people who already have it easier than them.
I don't think he should have to like it, he has a rather sound reason for not liking it. I just don't think its fair to say its smug to support and praise the law as if there isn't a ton of good in there worth being ecstatic about it's passage. I am more frustrated and tired of always having to defend it (more irl than say here) rather than wanting to rub it in peoples faces which is not the impression I wanted to show by any means. And I fully agree about that comment being stupid which is why I quickly deleted it out of the post. I don't want to be condescending about it at all, I am not in Eels position and don't want to act like I know better about his own problems, because I obviously don't.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: The Fake Shemp on April 16, 2010, 05:45:19 PM
Quote from: Kestastrophe
I thought the whole point of mandatory coverage was to increase the insurance pool, thus lowering costs?

That would be nice. The mandatory coverage is there to prevent folks from gaming the system; it's more or less a gimme for insurance companies that are adopting the consumer protections.

It won't lower any costs, and the insurance industry is already figuring out ways to protect its profit margins (http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20100415-715285.html?mod=WSJ_latestheadlines).

We got hosed, to be honest. This was a bunch of garbage wrapped up in some nice consumer protections and peddled to Cheebs' and the rest of his Politico pals as health care reform, when it was just a last ditch effort to save Obama's legislative credibility.

The fact is, now that this bill has passed, we will need real reform.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Cheebs on April 16, 2010, 05:47:24 PM
If Meghan McCain had proposed it you'd be singing a different tune.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: The Fake Shemp on April 16, 2010, 05:51:34 PM
I don't think any Republicans see eye-to-eye with me on the subject of health care reform, and that's fine. Unlike you, I recognize that both parties are working for the same corporations; their PR is just different. Neither party really want us to reform the industry.

We need a single-payer system. It's not only important to the health and well-being of our nation, but vital to our success and security for future generations.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Kestastrophe on April 16, 2010, 06:00:12 PM
I should have clarified, I mean cost per person, not cost as a whole (assuming that the probability for loss is less under mandatory coverage than it is currently, which is reasonable).
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: The Fake Shemp on April 16, 2010, 06:21:26 PM
Technically, costs per person should go down (but not if you're already insured and aren't eligible for government subsidies, your premium will probably go up).

Now the question will become, how much health care will that get you if the health insurance industry decides to use funky accounting and other creative ways to cook the books? There are measures in place to force insurers have to spend a mandatory amount in health care and provide a minimum level of service, but I don't think the industry will do either honestly.

We are still not really controlling the costs. The millions of new paying customers, especially young and healthy, are nullified by the adverse reaction of having to bring on a bunch of high-risk patients (some of which won't even be able to join the federal pool).

The exchange, from what I read, doesn't actually really promote competition.

I won't even touch the subject of pharmaceutical costs, which are a huge chunk of health care costs.

A lot of this bill is wishful thinking in my opinion, and needs a lot of things to fall in a row to work correctly. We'll see how it works out. My money is on total trainwreck.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Van Cruncheon on April 16, 2010, 06:22:06 PM
the self-employed are treated like shit under current tax laws, period. my youngest brother is in the same place eel is; he's a self-employed web dev who tries to do the right thing and actually file his taxes instead of working some shady under-the-table agreement, and he gets dicked for it. it's pretty much bullshit. i have quite a few friends who are self-employed, and it's no wonder they get pissed; the downside is they're smart and good citizens and couldn't be a tea party loon if they tried. it's simply sad that the current tax structure pissess all over ACTUAL entrepreneurship, and rewards corporations and wall street and upper middle-class assholes like me, and not the folks that aren't whores to the current socioeconomic system and are striking out on their own as their own bosses.

and they coulda ended recission without the crappy private health care requirement and the bizarre tax credit structure, but obama pussied out on the public option, and single-payer was never even on the table because of everyone squawking SOCIALISM
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: The Fake Shemp on April 16, 2010, 06:23:59 PM
Maybe he should do what our Congress does, Prole.

spoiler (click to show/hide)
... and not pay his taxes. :smug
[close]
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Eel O'Brian on April 16, 2010, 06:51:57 PM
just to clarify a couple of things

my taxes were actually pretty low this year, as difficult as that may be to believe

in 2008, I paid in 4600 total (i did make 5k more, as i said earlier)

this year i had a couple of extra expenses, and i guess i qualified for a $400 break according to my tax guy/brother

i suppose i could make shit up to deduct, but i have been warned that nowadays  they love to flag odd-looking deductions and haul your ass into an office to explain yourself

i am not trying to whine or ask for special treatment at all, i'd just like to have the same access to various benefits or programs that someone making the same as i do working for someone else has

what i am looking at is paying that 700 to 800 because i might be able to swing that much as opposed to the 1500lol i know i won't, and still not having any kind of health care to show for it in the end

and before anyone brings it up, i know i got a RoG laptop this year, and i had a third wii, and various games/etc, but what you don't know is i sold a lot of other possessions to be able to do that, as well as cutting corners here and there like forgoing a paint job on my flaking truck and continuing to wear the same painting clothes i've had for the past two years and eating off the dollar menu quite a bit (i love you, wendy)

all told i spent somewhere around $300-350 actual cash on myself this year - that probably would have been money better spent elsewhere, true, but there's no joy in working your ass off just to be able to afford to continue working your ass off

and yeah, i'm gonna get an ipad with some of the money i'm getting from selling my shit off, i've already had things pass through my hands and shipped off to some random ebayer which i'll never see again in my lifetime, and goddamned if i'm not going to have a little something to show for it when it's all gone

when you're a nerd my age you've accumulated a lot of stuff over the years, and now i am reaching the end of it, so next year will be very different/interesting - i won't have things to trade for other things, or to help pay off taxes, etc.

it's just sort of looking more and more like i might be better off throwing my hands in the air and getting on the government dollar

Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Smooth Groove on April 16, 2010, 07:01:12 PM
Eel, I was serious about the offer.  Let me know if there's something you want on Steam.  I'll be glad to help a friend in need. 
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Eel O'Brian on April 16, 2010, 07:06:03 PM
Eel, I was serious about the offer.  Let me know if there's something you want on Steam.  I'll be glad to help a friend in need. 

nah, but i certainly thank you for the offer, i still have all that stuff from the crazy holiday sale, and i have a gamefly account, so as long as the hardware holds up i still have access to games

man, reading through all that there's no way it didn't come off whiny, haha

i just hate being reminded that i am sort of poor every year around this time
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Kestastrophe on April 16, 2010, 07:14:13 PM
Why not add a paypal donate button to the borecast homepage? You guys can spend the money on games, equipment, etc.

https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_donate-intro-outside (https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_donate-intro-outside)

i am not trying to whine or ask for special treatment at all, i'd just like to have the same access to various benefits or programs that someone making the same as i do working for someone else has
sorry to hear that  :(
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Smooth Groove on April 16, 2010, 07:14:36 PM
I'm not fond of Apple but I'd love to have an Ipad for myself.  It's crap as a gaming device but its multimedia abilities are awesome.  

I wouldn't mind pitching in $50 to get Eel one first so set it up, Jinfash.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Eel O'Brian on April 16, 2010, 07:16:06 PM
thank you, but please don't

i'm not gonna go the rebelfm route

i have an ipod touch that i got with birthday money/gift cards/some of my own $ last year, i'm just gonna sell that and put some of the ebay money with it

plus prole hooks me up with gadget hand-me-downs all the time  :heart so it's not like i am a techless hobo or anything

Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Smooth Groove on April 16, 2010, 07:22:38 PM
How about I just sent you some Korean ramen?  That stuff is cheap and tasty.  You'll love it as long as you don't mind spicy foods or getting fat. 
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Eel O'Brian on April 16, 2010, 07:23:27 PM
^^hahaha^^

in conclusion, my business advice is not to start one

now where's my fucking forbes cover
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Ichirou on April 16, 2010, 07:35:07 PM
Cheebs sounds like such a cold asshole replying to Eel, but that's to be expected.  In Cheebs' eyes, Lord Obama can do no wrong. :lol
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Eel O'Brian on April 16, 2010, 07:41:01 PM
i don't hate the guy or anything, i'm sure he's making what he thinks are the best decisions, but i'm not buying much of the "we'll fix it later" talk
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Ichirou on April 16, 2010, 07:44:07 PM
It's kinda risky to go around with out insurance, what happens if you get cancer?  

...

Ask your friends at GAF to start folding on their PS3s?

omfg :rofl
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Olivia Wilde Homo on April 16, 2010, 07:47:14 PM
That is because Cheebs is a pampered white boy in the suburbs.  He'll never really know what hard times are like except for when his mom gets him the wrong kind of coffee when he sits in the backseat of his mom's car (or likely an SUV).
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Ichirou on April 16, 2010, 07:48:18 PM
That is because Cheebs is a pampered white boy in the suburbs.  He'll never really know what hard times are like except for when his mom gets him the wrong kind of coffee when he sits in the backseat of his mom's car (or likely an SUV).

How is that any different from most of the people who post in this forum?  I figure at least 75% of the folks who post here are pampered whiteys.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Eel O'Brian on April 16, 2010, 07:50:11 PM
cheebs is just saying what he believes is right, and i can't fault him for that, i've always known no one's gonna look out for me but me so i didn't take any of it as personally as you might expect
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Olivia Wilde Homo on April 16, 2010, 07:51:14 PM
That is because Cheebs is a pampered white boy in the suburbs.  He'll never really know what hard times are like except for when his mom gets him the wrong kind of coffee when he sits in the backseat of his mom's car (or likely an SUV).

How is that any different from most of the people who post in this forum?  I figure at least 75% of the folks who post here are pampered whiteys.

Unsurprisingly, these are the same people that patted him on the head and said, "I'm sorry but you're wrong."
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Cheebs on April 16, 2010, 07:53:12 PM
That is because Cheebs is a pampered white boy in the suburbs.  He'll never really know what hard times are like except for when his mom gets him the wrong kind of coffee when he sits in the backseat of his mom's car (or likely an SUV).
I am paying for my own college loans. Not my parents. And I drive my own car, thanks. I am not saying I don't come from a good upper middle class family and I somehow live the hard life but don't make assumptions. I rarely ever talk about my real life here.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Ichirou on April 16, 2010, 08:11:22 PM
That is because Cheebs is a pampered white boy in the suburbs.  He'll never really know what hard times are like except for when his mom gets him the wrong kind of coffee when he sits in the backseat of his mom's car (or likely an SUV).

How is that any different from most of the people who post in this forum?  I figure at least 75% of the folks who post here are pampered whiteys.

Unsurprisingly, these are the same people that patted him on the head and said, "I'm sorry but you're wrong."

What I'm saying is that it's stupid to imply that he holds that point of view because he "just doesn't know what it's like to have it rough" when other dudes who are in pretty much the same position as him disagree with him.

Cheebs is just Cheebs.  I've never gotten him to agree with me that Obama has done something badly and I probably never will.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Great Rumbler on April 16, 2010, 08:12:13 PM
the self-employed are treated like shit under current tax laws, period. my youngest brother is in the same place eel is; he's a self-employed web dev who tries to do the right thing and actually file his taxes instead of working some shady under-the-table agreement, and he gets dicked for it. it's pretty much bullshit.

My dad is a self-employed carpenter, so I've seen how bad it is. He pays out the nose in taxes and has no workers comp, retirement, or company insurance.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Brehvolution on April 16, 2010, 08:23:02 PM
^^hahaha^^

in conclusion, my business advice is not to start one


This is the truth. I've tried to get into business for myself twice and failed both times. All it got me was a mountain of debt that we are still paying off today.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Brehvolution on April 16, 2010, 08:31:38 PM
It takes a while to get a reputation for quality work. It's all about being able to weather the initial debt incurred when starting a business.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: The Fake Shemp on April 16, 2010, 10:04:06 PM
I'm self-employed. It sucks.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: The Dark Shake 3000 on April 16, 2010, 11:35:09 PM
Cheebs may be in a better situation than a lot of people but I still don't see why that should be a strike against what he posted. Yes, a marginal percentage of people in this country are hurt by health reform and what have you, but it is going towards a good cause. The government's not simply throwing your money away or giving it all to wellfare queens, like a lot of these Tea Party folks keep squawking about. I would happily live on Ramen noodles for a little while if it meant contributing to the betterment of my peers and perhaps even helping to save someone's life. Yeah it sucks that Eel and people like him have to more or less foot the bill, but at least it's going towards something that's actually worthwhile and not the usual shit like funding a war very few people asked for.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: The Fake Shemp on April 16, 2010, 11:38:56 PM
I think Mandark pretty much spelled out it completely over the course of two or three replies, but in case you missed it: It's called tact. Look it up.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: AdmiralViscen on April 16, 2010, 11:40:59 PM
Shake and Cheebs are both 19 or something, right?
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: The Fake Shemp on April 16, 2010, 11:45:27 PM
I believe so, give or take a year.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: The Dark Shake 3000 on April 16, 2010, 11:46:33 PM
Yes, I'm too young to own my own business. I guess that means I can't talk politics :'(
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Ichirou on April 17, 2010, 12:08:54 AM
Annihilated.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Cheebs on April 17, 2010, 12:11:19 AM
Shake and Cheebs are both 19 or something, right?
No
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: The Dark Shake 3000 on April 17, 2010, 12:14:32 AM
Who was annihilated, exactly? Or do you just like saying that randomly now since your dealings with GS?

Like I said I'm not trying to step on anyone's toes, I just don't think going "well Cheebs is in college so lololol" is a real excuse to ignore the point he was making. The common good should be more important than anything, even one's own wellbeing. Or maybe that's too socialist, idk. ::)
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Cheebs on April 17, 2010, 12:18:26 AM
My dad makes 250k a year and says he is perfectly fine with getting his taxes increased for Obama's various programs that it is understandable based on his tax bracket. Hell he says its unfair there is a cutoff of 90,000 (I believe that is what it is) for what you taxed on for social security. He thinks it should be for his full income. I guess he hasn't experienced life enough?

It has nothing to do with where you are in life.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: The Fake Shemp on April 17, 2010, 12:21:54 AM
Jesus Christ, you two are dense.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Ichirou on April 17, 2010, 12:23:26 AM
Who was annihilated, exactly? Or do you just like saying that randomly now since your dealings with GS?

Basically, yeah. :teehee

My dad makes 250k a year

My dad makes 250k a year

My dad makes 250k a year

My dad makes 250k a year

[youtube=560,345]Vk91ymiO3iA[/youtube]
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: The Fake Shemp on April 17, 2010, 12:24:05 AM
Quote from: Mandark
It's another thing to tell the losers that they should also like it, especially in a way that's dismissive of their grievances, especially in a way that treats them like simpletons ("what if you got cancer?"), especially by citing benefits to other people who already have it easier than them.

I had to make the font bigger, because apparently you didn't read it the first time.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: AdmiralViscen on April 17, 2010, 12:24:41 AM
Who was annihilated, exactly? Or do you just like saying that randomly now since your dealings with GS?

Like I said I'm not trying to step on anyone's toes, I just don't think going "well Cheebs is in college so lololol" is a real excuse to ignore the point he was making. The common good should be more important than anything, even one's own wellbeing. Or maybe that's too socialist, idk. ::)

I was talking more about you saying you'd be wiling to eat nothing but ramen noodles for the greater good.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Cheebs on April 17, 2010, 12:24:55 AM
And he is a socialist who votes for Ralph Nader!
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: The Dark Shake 3000 on April 17, 2010, 12:29:15 AM
Who was dismissing their grievances? You guys jumped on Cheebs for making a valid point and saying he is being insensitive when he was not. He even said he understands where Eel is coming from and feels bad for him, and yet you guys jumped on him for "being a dick" anyway. No one is saying Eel doesn't have a right to feel the way he does, but rather that he should just keep in mind what good the money he's giving away is doing for others. Others who, contrary to popular belief, often aren't living an easier life than someone who owns their own business. Saying people who don't have jobs have an easier life than you do is what's dismissive. It's akin to being against wellfare because "lolol all those wellfare queens just spend it on drugs and liquor". ::)
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Ichirou on April 17, 2010, 12:32:09 AM
Who was dismissing their grievances? You guys jumped on Cheebs for making a valid point and saying he is being insensitive when he was not. He even said he understands where Eel is coming from and feels bad for him, and yet you guys jumped on him for "being a dick" anyway. No one is saying Eel doesn't have a right to feel the way he does, but rather that he should just keep in mind what good the money he's giving away is doing for others. Others who, contrary to popular belief, often aren't living an easier life than someone who owns their own business. Saying people who don't have jobs have an easier life than you do is what's dismissive. It's akin to being against wellfare because "lolol all those wellfare queens just spend it on drugs and liquor". ::)

Willco annihilated.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: AdmiralViscen on April 17, 2010, 12:33:10 AM
........
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: The Fake Shemp on April 17, 2010, 12:33:39 AM
Who was dismissing their grievances? You guys jumped on Cheebs for making a valid point and saying he is being insensitive when he was not.

...

Quote from: Cheebs
It sucks he has to pay for something he can barely afford, but that is not enough of a reason to not be happy with the overall benefits of the mandate and the law as a whole. It helps too many people. It is worth being happy about and proud that it got passed.

Quote from: Cheebs
I mean I had benefits from the govt job I was working full time last year. I left it and now getting my masters full time. Thanks to this law I am able to go back on my parents plan till I am finished in a year and get a job again. I have no reason to hate this law.

Really, Shake? Really? ::)
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Cheebs on April 17, 2010, 12:34:15 AM
I was talking about ME being happy with it. Not him. Don't spin my words. I made sure to bring up multiple times it was understandable he was pissed with it but for ME the greater good of the bill was worth supporting.

Are you saying because eel takes a hit from it I can't he happy with it? That makes no fucking sense.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: The Dark Shake 3000 on April 17, 2010, 12:35:07 AM
Yeah, I still fail to see what's so insensitive about those posts. Eel even said he understood where Cheebs was coming from and isn't taking it personally.

You guys just want to jump on someone regardless, I guess.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Ichirou on April 17, 2010, 12:35:41 AM
Willco destroyed.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: The Fake Shemp on April 17, 2010, 12:36:04 AM
Oh, I figured as much. I was pointing out that part in reference to Shake's assertion that you were not dismissing his grievances.

"Well, that sucks for Eel, but health care reform! Let the good times roll!"

"... I'm still poor, though!"

"Whatever!" :violin
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: The Dark Shake 3000 on April 17, 2010, 12:37:04 AM
He's not dismissing his grievances. He even says it sucks for Eel. What is so offensive about those posts?
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: The Fake Shemp on April 17, 2010, 12:37:06 AM
Yeah, I still fail to see what's so insensitive about those posts.

Big surprise!

Eel doesn't care because he doesn't care about what anyone says. He admits that he is aware that nobody will help, least of all Cheebs showing some tact.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Cheebs on April 17, 2010, 12:39:07 AM
Oh, I figured as much. I was pointing out that part in reference to Shake's assertion that you were not dismissing his grievances.

"Well, that sucks for Eel, but health care reform! Let the good times roll!"

"... I'm still poor, though!"

"Whatever!" :violin
Yeah it sucks for eel but tell me why that should at all impact my support of it? I am not eel. Yes his situation sucks and he has every right to be angry about the bill.

But I am not Eel! The law helps me (and millions of people). Tell me again why I can't praise something I like and that helps me just because it sucks for eel? I don't understand at all.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: The Dark Shake 3000 on April 17, 2010, 12:40:28 AM
Not showing tact would be posting something like "shut the fuck up you angry old white man, don't you know what a greedy fuck you're being? This is good for people you fucking tea party asswipe!"

Again, no one said this, because we realize it's not such a black and white issue. Cheebs merely posted why he thinks the act is a good thing, and people attacked him out of turn for being insensitive.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Ichirou on April 17, 2010, 12:43:33 AM
Real talk: I'm sorry, Shake, but Cheebs really did come off sounding like a bit of a dick.  Like he just HAD to defend Obama (like he always does), instead of just keeping his mouth shut and being respectfully silent regarding Eel's situation.

And then you came in the next page and basically repeated the same thing, with the added cup noodles joke.

I'm not saying you guys were purposefully being dickish at all, but there was a certain lack of tact regarding a situation neither of you is ever going to have to deal with.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: The Fake Shemp on April 17, 2010, 12:43:49 AM
I like how your argument for Cheebs not being insensitive is that he was not a raging asshole.

"He could have been so much worse! What would have really been insensitive is that if Cheebs raped Eel's family members and then shat on his couch! Now that's insensitive!"

Yes, Shake, you can be insensitive without being a raging asshole. You two don't get it and none of us expect you to. Martyr it up, please.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Cheebs on April 17, 2010, 12:44:07 AM
I could spin the same argument and say you are being insensitive for not thinking of the poor people who now can get on the new health care govt. program that will be created when you said you didn't like the bill. You want them to rot in the street and die?

See how stupid that sounds? That is exactly what you are implying but using eel instead. And even then I have said multiple times he has every right to be pissed about this. But you act like as if he is the center of this entire law. Yes it sucks for him but there is ton of other people impacted by this law, many for the better and for that I supported it.

If I demanded every piece of legislation to help everybody and cause absolutely nobody to have to pay a penny more in taxes then I wouldn't be able to support a damn thing government ever does.


It is stupid eel is involved in this because I have no problem with him, he has every right to be pissed. Nothing wrong with that. It's his right and he seems to have a good basis to be angry about the bill.

But your weird demand I cant praise something just because one person at eb doesn't like it is...insane.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: The Fake Shemp on April 17, 2010, 12:45:36 AM
I could spin the same argument and say you are being insensitive for not thinking of the poor people who now can get on the new health care govt. program that will be created when you said you didn't like the bill. You want them to rot in the street and die?

I guess you could, if these hypothetical poor people were in this thread and discussing their actual lives, you dolt. :lol
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: The Dark Shake 3000 on April 17, 2010, 12:46:02 AM
Real talk: I'm sorry, Shake, but Cheebs really did come off sounding like a bit of a dick.  Like he just HAD to defend Obama (like he always does), instead of just keeping his mouth shut and being respectfully silent regarding Eel's situation.

And then you came in the next page and basically repeated the same thing, with the added cup noodles joke.

This isn't a "my dog died" thread or something. This is an internet forum, and Eel posted something that was clearly meant to engender discussion about issues facing most of us on this board. Why isn't Cheebs allowed to post something that speaks to his own situation? This isn't Eel's thread nor did Eel ask us not to post anything in response to his post. Cheebs was respectful and his reply is hardly as incendiary as you guys make it sound.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: The Fake Shemp on April 17, 2010, 12:47:04 AM
I don't think anyone said Cheebs was malicious (but nice deflection), but that he was insensitive.

... which he was.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Cheebs on April 17, 2010, 12:48:48 AM
So I have to keep my mouth shut about my support for health care purely because eel didn't like it?

See, I would get that if this was eel's thread talking about his shitty situation (which it very much is). But this wasn't and we were discussing politics before he shared his view. Just because he didn't like it all conservation had to stop and I was no longer allowed to praise the bill? You don't realize how crazy that sounds?

I don't think anyone said Cheebs was malicious (but nice deflection), but that he was insensitive.

... which he was.
It's insensitive to say all debate had to magically end just because eel came in and shared his story of his situation. All debate magically has to stop at EB when some one comes into a thread and has a different side of the story? How does that make ANY sense?
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: The Dark Shake 3000 on April 17, 2010, 12:49:14 AM
You guys should all stop shitting up my thread with discussion that doesn't center around my video nor specifically the Tea Party event in NYC :'(

Stop being so insensitive, guys. There's already an existing politics thread.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Ichirou on April 17, 2010, 12:50:41 AM
The thread is still on-topic, Shake.  I'm seeing a lot of angry white people posting on it. :lol
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: The Fake Shemp on April 17, 2010, 12:51:29 AM
See, I would get that if this was eel's thread talking about his shitty situation (which it very much is). But this wasn't and we were discussing politics before he shared his view. Just because he didn't like it all conservation had to stop and I was no longer allowed to praise the bill? You don't realize how crazy that sounds?

No, Cheebs, nobody is saying you shouldn't be able to express your viewpoint, but you could have done it with some tact. If you'd like a private lesson in it, feel free to IM me. I could draft you a reply that doesn't make you sound like insensitive yuppie spawn.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: The Dark Shake 3000 on April 17, 2010, 12:51:46 AM
The thread is still on-topic, Shake.  I'm seeing a lot of angry white people posting on it. :lol

Oh fffffffffuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu :lol
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Cheebs on April 17, 2010, 12:53:53 AM
Let me put it this way to Willco and Ichi:

Shake makes a thread about grandpas.

Many are talking about how much they love their grandpas.

Eel posts and says he doesn't like his grandpa that he was mean to him (and has a good reason to feel that way).

What you are saying is now because of this all the previous conversation can no longer be discussed, I am hear by banned from saying I love my grandpa anymore in that thread.

It makes no sense.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: pollo on April 17, 2010, 12:54:08 AM
Eel, that 400 bucks was from the Making Work Pay Credit, I got the same thing. I had about around 20,000 AGI last year and paid only about 1850 in taxes-- then again I have student loan interest I can deduct as well as Education Credits for taking classes. Seems like I paid a lot less than you. FTR I am self employed. I guess it's your company status that screws you.

Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: The Fake Shemp on April 17, 2010, 12:54:58 AM
Let me put it this way to Willco and Ichi:

Shake makes a thread about grandpas.

Many are talking about how much they love their grandpas.

Eel posts and says he doesn't like his grandpa that he was mean to him.

What you are saying is now because of this all the previous conversation can no longer be discussed, I am hear by banned from saying I love my grandpa anymore in that thread any more.

It makes no sense.


NOBODY IS SAYING THIS. ARE YOU THIS STUPID IN REAL LIFE? IF SO, HOW ARE YOU IN COLLEGE?
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: The Dark Shake 3000 on April 17, 2010, 12:55:01 AM
"I can understand why Eel wouldn't love his grandpa, but mine wasn't abusive and I think grandpas are a wonderful thing."

"Shut the FUCK UP you yuppie scum! Stop being a dick!"

:tbslol
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Cheebs on April 17, 2010, 12:56:19 AM
Let me put it this way to Willco and Ichi:

Shake makes a thread about grandpas.

Many are talking about how much they love their grandpas.

Eel posts and says he doesn't like his grandpa that he was mean to him.

What you are saying is now because of this all the previous conversation can no longer be discussed, I am hear by banned from saying I love my grandpa anymore in that thread any more.

It makes no sense.


NOBODY IS SAYING THIS. ARE YOU THIS STUPID IN REAL LIFE? IF SO, HOW ARE YOU IN COLLEGE?
You and Ichi said its insensitive to say how happy I am with health care when eel was telling his story.

I never said eel had to like or his situation wasn't fucked up. All I said was I liked it. And said the greater good was more important to ME.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Ichirou on April 17, 2010, 12:56:54 AM
Let me put it this way to Willco and Ichi:

Shake makes a thread about grandpas.

Many are talking about how much they love their grandpas.

Eel posts and says he doesn't like his grandpa that he was mean to him (and has a good reason to feel that way).

What you are saying is now because of this all the previous conversation can no longer be discussed, I am hear by banned from saying I love my grandpa anymore in that thread.

It makes no sense.


"My grampa beat me and sodomized me."

"That sucks for you, but your grampa took me out for ice cream once and he even bought me a scooter.  Your grampa rocks!"

...more accurate.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Cheebs on April 17, 2010, 12:57:37 AM
Let me put it this way to Willco and Ichi:

Shake makes a thread about grandpas.

Many are talking about how much they love their grandpas.

Eel posts and says he doesn't like his grandpa that he was mean to him (and has a good reason to feel that way).

What you are saying is now because of this all the previous conversation can no longer be discussed, I am hear by banned from saying I love my grandpa anymore in that thread.

It makes no sense.

"My grampa beat me and sodomized me."

"That sucks for you, but your grampa took me out for ice cream once and he even bought me a scooter.  Your grampa rocks!"

...more accurate.
Except the health care bill isn't his. It's just as much mine. And Willco's and Shakes. Doesn't matter if they work or are in college or their age.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Ichirou on April 17, 2010, 12:58:16 AM
It's sodomizing his wallet.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: The Dark Shake 3000 on April 17, 2010, 12:58:35 AM
The American government beat Eel and sodomized him, and then took Cheebs out for ice cream?

Eel should tear up his citizenship :usacry
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Cheebs on April 17, 2010, 12:59:35 AM
It's sodomizing his wallet.
And its making a lot of Americans save money thanks to a new govt. program of health care for individuals who cant afford to purchase it.

Or am I not allowed to think about them?  I am not saying Eel can't be pissed but fucking sue me for caring about the millions who'll get coverage thanks to this bill.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: The Dark Shake 3000 on April 17, 2010, 01:00:34 AM
Eel has every right to be upset about the bill, and to post as much. And Cheebs has every right to provide a counter argument.

That's the American Way™
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Cheebs on April 17, 2010, 01:02:35 AM
I could understand if this was a law made purely for Eel. But this is a law that will help save a lot of money for a lot of people. Eel isn't one of them and yes, that sucks. But there are MILLIONS will will benefit from this that should maybe be considered too.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Ichirou on April 17, 2010, 01:02:47 AM
The American government beat Eel and sodomized him, and then took Cheebs out for ice cream?

Eel should tear up his citizenship :usacry

Not the American government.  One man...

(http://www.myglife.org/usa/wv/egmswiki/images/6/63/Obama_sucks.jpg)
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: The Dark Shake 3000 on April 17, 2010, 01:03:29 AM
Yes because Obama is the entire government, and makes all the laws happen himself :bow

He's just that good.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: The Dark Shake 3000 on April 17, 2010, 01:05:44 AM
Also, for argument's sake what if I was to say that Eel was insensitive for bringing a personal grievance only tangentially related to the topic at hand up and completely derailing my thread?

I mean I'm not because that's distinguished mentally-challenged, but I guess I'm just not up on what is and isn't considered fair play on EB.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Ichirou on April 17, 2010, 01:06:17 AM
Him and his posse...

(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_PVyDmTkfk6s/Sx5AhA0rbhI/AAAAAAAACxg/7XQxUBuDI9U/s400/drevilreid.jpg)

(http://steynian.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/nancy-pelosi-facelift.jpg)
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Cheebs on April 17, 2010, 01:07:46 AM
Well at least I know before I take a stance of support for any legislation I need to make sure the legislation will be supported by everyone who potentially will post in that topic at eb before I support it.

I could understand praising it being insensitive if this was eel's thread about how the bill hurts him. Because that would be a fucking rude thing to do and I would never do that, but that isn't the situation here.


Nancy Pelosi > everyone at EB including myself. :bow
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Mandark on April 17, 2010, 01:08:19 AM
I gave a shot at having a learning moment with Cheebs and it didn't stick.  I didn't think it would and any attempts to carry the argument are going to make it completely tiresome and meta and full of terrible metaphors OH WAIT I SEE WE ARE HERE ALREADY.

and they coulda ended recission without the crappy private health care requirement and the bizarre tax credit structure, but obama pussied out on the public option, and single-payer was never even on the table because of everyone squawking SOCIALISM

Maybe, but there's a lot more regulation than the recission stuff and since the bill destroys the traditional role of insurance companies in underwriting (weeding out people who will probably need medical care), there was gonna be something in there to prevent ZOMG adverse selection death spiral.  Having a public option wouldn't have changed that.  It'd just be another choice for how to fill in the Pay To The Order Of part of the check they're making you write.

I really think the importance libruls have attached to the public option has a tad more to do with wanting to keep insurance companies from profiting than the actual good it would do people.  I don't really care that much about corporate profiteering unless it gets so bad it warps the economy.  It's the large scale version of the welfare cheat for me.  Yeah he's a dick, but I'll gladly let some parasites get theirs if it means actually providing a decent baseline in living standards and social services for the population as a whole (not that this bill does that).
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: The Fake Shemp on April 17, 2010, 01:08:25 AM
Look, Cheebs, apparently because you are not only insensitive, but completely clueless, let me spell it out for you:

NOBODY CARES THAT YOU ARE PRO-H.R. 3590, BUT THAT YOU REITERATED YOUR OPINION WITHOUT ANY REGARDS TO THE POSTER DISCUSSING HIS REAL-LIFE STRUGGLES.

YOU ARE FREE TO EXPRESS YOUR OPINION, BUT PERHAPS YOU SHOULD TRY TO NOT SOUND SO MUCH LIKE AN OVER PRIVILEGED DICK WHEN COMPARING SITUATIONS TO SOMEONE WHO IS OBVIOUSLY STRUGGLING.

Here would be a sample of a better reply:

Quote from: Cheebs
Eel, I understand your that you are part of a percentage of working Americans negatively impacted by the bill, and that really does suck. I hope this puts us on a path to eventually getting affordable health care reform for those who are self-employed. I think it will - eventually.

But right now, it gives millions of Americans access to insurance that they otherwise could not afford, and that is why I am in favor of this bill. Nobody's struggles are greater than anyone else's, but I think we can help more Americans across the board with the reform going into place right now than without.

My financial situation is vastly different than yours, but I can say that I now have direct access to health care due to certain consumer protections that take effect immediately. I know this means little to you, but I felt it was worth noting that there is a positive side to this bill - at least on a personal level. It's not all bad.

I do sympathize with your struggles, but I sincerely believe this will lead us to getting the help you need. It sucks that good people might be squeezed in the meanwhile.

... The difference between me and you is, I don't have my head up my ass (an admirable feat for such a big guy).
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Cheebs on April 17, 2010, 01:11:41 AM
BUT THAT YOU REITERATED YOUR OPINION WITHOUT ANY REGARDS TO THE POSTER DISCUSSING HIS REAL-LIFE STRUGGLES.

I repeated ENDLESSLY in this thread that his situation sucks and he has every right to be pissed off. I guess I should repeat it 20 more times? Even Eel said he didn't take what I said personally!

I am sorry I didn't express it clearly enough for you.  ::)
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Ichirou on April 17, 2010, 01:12:24 AM
Damn libruls.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: The Dark Shake 3000 on April 17, 2010, 01:12:36 AM
Except Cheebs did express that he felt bad for Eel, even in a post YOU YOURSELF QUOTED Willco. Which is why all this bickering is so silly.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Cheebs on April 17, 2010, 01:12:56 AM
Taxes > anime
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Mandark on April 17, 2010, 01:14:21 AM
Forget it Willco, it's Chinatown.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: The Fake Shemp on April 17, 2010, 01:15:13 AM
Thanks, Mandark. I was about to launch into a multi-paragraph rebuttal, but I clicked preview and saw your post. You're right.
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: The Dark Shake 3000 on April 17, 2010, 01:16:16 AM
Forget it Willco, it's the internet, where people are still allowed to express their opinions freely, especially in a civilized manor.

Fixed for accuracy.
Title: Re: ITT: Eel and Cheebs Have Contradictory Opinions About Their Grandparents
Post by: Cheebs on April 17, 2010, 01:22:03 AM
This doesn't relate to just this thread, more in general I am still clueless on why Willco thinks he somehow has more life experience than me and thus I should ceed to his wisdom on things. I don't know what about being in your mid-20's and a struggling screenwriter has over what I have done in my life. Which I have gone through a lot of shit you and most of eb don't know about.  It is fucking annoying how you act like I am some innocent child to be "schooled".

It is growing very tired seeing you try to pat me on my head in topic after topic. You haven't experienced more than me or know more than me. You don't know anything about my life. I have my own little sob stories that I could share (how about the time I nearly died and was in the hospital for almost 2 years straight?). But I don't feel like sharing shit about my life on a internet forum. So for that I guess it is decided I have lived a perfect sheltered life to be taught lessons by you and others.

Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: The Dark Shake 3000 on April 17, 2010, 01:23:24 AM
Isn't Willco in his mid-20s?
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Ichirou on April 17, 2010, 01:23:42 AM
I think in Willco and Mandark's mind you're still a first-year college student or something.
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: The Dark Shake 3000 on April 17, 2010, 01:24:56 AM
Yep, because it's easier to brush someone aside as an uncultured child than to actually engage them on any intellectual level. Especially when one isn't much of an intellectual. :smug
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Cheebs on April 17, 2010, 01:27:57 AM
I think in Willco and Mandark's mind you're still a first-year college student or something.

It seems that way.

Some here REFUSE to accept I am not some 16 year old kid living in my parents basement.  You may disagree with me, you may think my views are fucking stupid but stop acting like I am a kid who hasn't lived life, you have very little idea of any details of my life. Disagree and mock my views but stop actin like you've lived life and thus are more informed to have views.

I mean it's not like Willco is some wise old career man, he is in his mid-20's living pay check to pay check. Most people over 40 would see him just as much as a  innocent "kid" as shake.
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: The Dark Shake 3000 on April 17, 2010, 01:31:18 AM
Willco gets paychecks? I thought he was a "struggling" screenwriter?
Title: Re: ITT: Eel and Cheebs Have Contradictory Opinions About Their Grandparents
Post by: The Fake Shemp on April 17, 2010, 01:36:43 AM
This doesn't relate to just this thread, more in general I am still clueless on why Willco thinks he somehow has more life experience than me and thus I should ceed to his wisdom on things.

This has absolutely nothing to do with that, but if it makes you sleep better at night - feel free to think that. I think it's pretty cute that you're victimizing yourself here. :lol

It really just has to do with the fact that you were an insensitive twat. At first I just thought you poorly worded your reply, because I had more respect for your intelligence and empathy level prior to the last page. Now I realize you're clueless. It's a shame.

Shake is being Shake. I can't fault him for that.
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: The Dark Shake 3000 on April 17, 2010, 01:37:29 AM
Standing up for what's right :bow
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: The Fake Shemp on April 17, 2010, 01:38:22 AM
Internet martyr. :bow
Title: Re: ITT: Eel and Cheebs Have Contradictory Opinions About Their Grandparents
Post by: Cheebs on April 17, 2010, 01:39:14 AM
This doesn't relate to just this thread, more in general I am still clueless on why Willco thinks he somehow has more life experience than me and thus I should ceed to his wisdom on things.

This has absolutely nothing to do with that, but if it makes you sleep better at night - feel free to think that.

It really just has to do with the fact that you were an insensitive twat. At first I just thought you poorly worded your reply, because I had more respect for your intelligence and empathy level prior to the last page. Now I realize you're clueless. It's a shame.

Shake is being Shake. I can't fault him for that.
I am being a twat to you, not eel. I continuously tried to say I understood his point and he even said he didn't take anything I said personally. Yet even after he said that you rushed into defend his honor for what seems like just an excuse to start shit.

None of the past 284924824 pages has anything to do what I said to eel and you know that, that ended when eel said he didn't take what I said personally. It is just another faked outrage to find another reason to start shit with one of the "michigan distinguished mentally-challenged fellows" which somehow shake always ends up being lumped into or whatever.
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Ichirou on April 17, 2010, 01:40:50 AM
Everybody fucking relax.
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: The Fake Shemp on April 17, 2010, 01:41:18 AM
No, you were an insensitive twat to Eel. You've refused to concede this, and have concocted some ridiculous straw man argument about critics trying to silence your opinion or something equally delusional.

Now you've moved on to setting yourself up as the victim, with some pre-menstrual diatribe about how Mandark and I look down to you because of some age gap or lack of real world experience. You sound like a Livejournal now. :lol
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: The Dark Shake 3000 on April 17, 2010, 01:41:35 AM
(http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y97/mastershake05/martyr.jpg)

Someone change my tag to "Batting cleanup for the Michigan distinguished mentally-challenged fellows" :rock
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Cheebs on April 17, 2010, 01:41:48 AM
Everybody fucking relax.
This argument could have ended page one when eel came in and said he didn't take anything I said personally. But Willco and the anti-"michigan distinguished mentally-challenged fellow" crew had to rush in to defend his honor. Can't pass up a chance to argue with cheebs or shake!
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Cheebs on April 17, 2010, 01:42:00 AM
(http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y97/mastershake05/martyr.jpg)

Someone change my tag to "Batting cleanup for the Michigan distinguished mentally-challenged fellows" :rock
:lol :bow
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: The Fake Shemp on April 17, 2010, 01:44:02 AM
At least Shake has a sense of humor!
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Cheebs on April 17, 2010, 01:48:13 AM
At least Shake has a sense of humor!
As long as you stop pretending you have some sort of more life experience and always feel the need to pat me on my head like an inferior I have no beef with you at all, which has something that has been going on since I first joined and hoped and expected would have been long since passed when I returned last month but it didn't seem to, whoever I was in 2006 is the person that got stuck in a lot of peoples minds unfairly. If you think I am saying distinguished mentally-challenged shit treat me as an equal when you call my views distinguished mentally-challenged.  :-*
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: The Fake Shemp on April 17, 2010, 01:49:01 AM
I never said that. Wow, you've shifted from ignorant to delusional with a persecution complex. :lol
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Ichirou on April 17, 2010, 01:49:10 AM
I think it's plain to see that Willco and Cheebs are equally distinguished mentally-challenged.
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: The Fake Shemp on April 17, 2010, 01:49:50 AM
Says the guy who got ripped off by Mupepe. :smug
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Ichirou on April 17, 2010, 01:50:30 AM
I never said I wasn't even more distinguished mentally-challenged.  :-\
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: The Dark Shake 3000 on April 17, 2010, 01:50:55 AM
I think you're all distinguished mentally-challenged. You should all make signs and protest in the middle of 4chan. :'(
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: The Fake Shemp on April 17, 2010, 01:51:13 AM
It's okay, I still accept you, Ichirou. :interracial
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Cheebs on April 17, 2010, 01:52:37 AM
Ichi will still be pissed at Mupepe long after I, Shake, or Willco even remember this thread.  8)
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: The Dark Shake 3000 on April 17, 2010, 01:53:26 AM
Ichi will still be filing the paperwork to take Mupepe to small claims court long after we're all dead. :lol
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Madrun Badrun on April 17, 2010, 01:53:32 AM
(http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y97/mastershake05/martyr.jpg)

Someone change my tag to "Batting cleanup for the Michigan distinguished mentally-challenged fellows" :rock

:lol :lol
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Smooth Groove on April 17, 2010, 01:53:59 AM
(http://img22.imageshack.us/img22/1701/martyrx.jpg)
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Cheebs on April 17, 2010, 01:54:34 AM
I remember when Ichi still hated shake for like a year after the Mupepe.com madness.

I honestly can't remember why Ichi used to hate shake.  :lol
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Ichirou on April 17, 2010, 01:55:59 AM
Because he loved Kevin Smith.
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Cheebs on April 17, 2010, 01:57:09 AM
That was why you held a year+ long grudge and trashed him eb in that period?  :lol


OH SHIT shake in aim:
it all started with us making fun of him for thinking sin city should have been a real noir
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Ichirou on April 17, 2010, 01:58:09 AM
Nah, the Kevin Smith stuff came even before that, back when I still posted on GAF. :lol
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: The Dark Shake 3000 on April 17, 2010, 01:58:12 AM
http://img22.imageshack.us/img22/1701/martyrx.jpg (http://img22.imageshack.us/img22/1701/martyrx.jpg)

(http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y97/mastershake05/NOODLES.jpg)
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Smooth Groove on April 17, 2010, 01:59:01 AM
:lol
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Cheebs on April 17, 2010, 01:59:09 AM
I need to try out BK's cup of noodles next time I go there.
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Ichirou on April 17, 2010, 02:00:31 AM
Pretty sure he snuck that into the BK, ghetto style.
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Cheebs on April 17, 2010, 02:02:54 AM
I think we found out how to end all wars now at least. Bring pictures of high/drunk bk beast shake poorly photoshopped onto other images.
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Smooth Groove on April 17, 2010, 02:04:06 AM
I love how that cup o noodles is as big as his head.  More like pot o noodles. 
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Ichirou on April 17, 2010, 02:04:28 AM
Shake really did die for our sins.
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: The Dark Shake 3000 on April 17, 2010, 02:05:31 AM
I'm putting out a book of these this summer :bow

(http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y97/mastershake05/thesquare.jpg)

:shh
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Cheebs on April 17, 2010, 02:05:55 AM
 :lol :lol :lol
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Ichirou on April 17, 2010, 02:09:24 AM
:rofl
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: The Dark Shake 3000 on April 17, 2010, 02:11:32 AM
(http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y97/mastershake05/dreams.jpg)

Last one, I promise :spin
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: demi on April 17, 2010, 02:11:44 AM
I know I'm late on this, but do you do the estimated payment plan Eel? I learned that when I paid my huge tax sum one year. Someone suggested it, now I'm throwing payments at the IRS to keep them at bay, giving more when JESUS decides to grace me with extra funds. I was told this by someone who works for themself - "Never pay all at once. Everyone who is in this industry does payments." You can pay as low as $50/mo even
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Cheebs on April 17, 2010, 02:12:14 AM
(http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y97/mastershake05/dreams.jpg)

Last one, I promise :spin
this is becoming like wheres waldo



:shh
(http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y97/mastershake05/dot.jpg)
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: The Dark Shake 3000 on April 17, 2010, 02:19:32 AM
I don't even remember that :lol

spoiler (click to show/hide)
(http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y97/mastershake05/vietnam.jpg)

I can't help myself. feelin' too sexxy.
[close]
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Cheebs on April 17, 2010, 02:22:00 AM
I don't even remember that :lol

spoiler (click to show/hide)
(http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y97/mastershake05/vietnam.jpg)

I can't help myself. feelin' too sexxy.
[close]
:rofl
That is both amazing and horrible. I can only sum it up my feelings in one image of yours:
(http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y97/mastershake05/quetee.jpg)

Make that two:
spoiler (click to show/hide)
(http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y97/mastershake05/ichibanner.jpg)
[close]
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: The Dark Shake 3000 on April 17, 2010, 02:24:11 AM
Wow, THREE different threads for Grindhouse? WTF? :rofl
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Cheebs on April 17, 2010, 02:25:31 AM
First one had 111 posts, a forum of like 3 people.
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Ichirou on April 17, 2010, 02:31:16 AM
Do you keep all that shit in a file somewhere? omg :rofl
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: The Dark Shake 3000 on April 17, 2010, 02:33:58 AM
It's all on my photobucket account, along with like 70 pictures of Tarantino we used :rofl

Also this thread has successfully been salvaged. All in a good day's work, gents :bow
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Ichirou on April 17, 2010, 02:36:00 AM
Post the picture of him looking all fucked up and suckin' on some toes.
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Cheebs on April 17, 2010, 02:36:34 AM
:rofl
(http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y97/mastershake05/amnintendumb.jpg)
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: The Dark Shake 3000 on April 17, 2010, 02:36:59 AM
Post the picture of him looking all fucked up and suckin' on some toes.

This?

(http://dcairns.files.wordpress.com/2008/04/tarantino_sucking-toes-photo.jpg)
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Cheebs on April 17, 2010, 02:38:13 AM
I think Ichi meant this:
(http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y97/mastershake05/stuff-1.jpg)
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Ichirou on April 17, 2010, 02:38:24 AM
(http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y97/mastershake05/Photo14.jpg)
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: The Dark Shake 3000 on April 17, 2010, 02:38:32 AM
Omg sad penis :bow
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Cheebs on April 17, 2010, 02:39:52 AM
Ichi is your last name really Yourafaggy?  :o
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Ichirou on April 17, 2010, 02:41:09 AM
Yes, I'm a secret muslim.
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Phoenix Dark on April 17, 2010, 03:14:21 AM
Cheebs: The bill is not perfect. The fact that it helps you and people you know doesn't mean it's perfect for everyone else, especially considering your privileged life situation. That's not a knock on your but come the fuck on: your dad is very well off, he got you an internship, Obama got you a job apparently, etc. Eel is in a tough situation like many folks, and has actually done the homework and found out the bill will not help him as much as other people. You've sounded pretty cold/uncaring throughout this thread

Willco: The bill is better than a status quo, and you'd be hard pressed to find many people who would disagree with the fact that democrats threw nearly every cost bending idea into the bill, except the public option of course. The CBO numbers speak for themselves. I notice you make the same criticism of the bill in every discussion of it, but it's simply not true.


The bill is going to help me, but then again I'm like Cheebs in terms of being in a privileged situation. It doesn't have some of the stuff I wanted like a public option, but there are a lot of good things in the bill and it's going to benefit a lot of people. Yes, it's better than the status quo. It's a start, and it's going to be improved over the years, and may even have a public option in a decade or so.
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: ManaByte on April 17, 2010, 03:39:48 AM
Yeah, his taxes sound ridiculously high for his income. Maybe have someone help you with writing more things off for the business?

It's because he's self-employed. You pay a higher percentage in taxes when you're  self-employed in comparison to people "on the books". Eel's numbers look almost identical to mine, but I got off easier this year since I'm a full time student but last year I paid about the same as him.
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: etiolate on April 17, 2010, 04:52:18 AM
You guys don't know me.  I've had a hard life.  Once I was so sick I had to spend time in a hospital that my parents could afford.

I am using this to tell a sad yet cool story.

I got extremely sick when I hit puberty, and I had seen multiple doctors before one of them diagnosed me with diabetes(I pretty much missed all of junior high with illness/hospitals) and tried to hospitalize me for treatment. I didn't like the doctor that did this, he had no bedside manner and treated patients like part of his research and credentials. Total ass. But being only 13, I still had a pediatrician, and it was the pediatrician who got me into the hospital. At that point there was a big fight between the hospital and my health care provider(big surprise) and the hospital and provider were both cock blocking each other from getting to bill or getting money. So, the hospital charges were going to go straight to my mother or the hospital was going to kick me out mid-treatment. My pediatrician stepped in and basically organized an agreement between both sides by his own moxy and persistence. This was sort of landmark for getting the two sides to work together and he did it just for my care.

His wife also was the doctor who delivered my sister. Their family was rather tied to mine. He ended up being one of the biggest pediatricians in the city and my sister and I were among his first patients. Thus the loyalty.

Unfortunately, years later we were watching the news and saw a plane crash. It was a small personal plane, and then they ran the names at the bottom, it was him and his wife. They were flying and the plane faulted, lost control and flew into the Napa Valley hillside. The had two kids, but hadn't set up a will for them. Due to his popularity, a trust fund was made, but the kids were without immediate family in the area as he was an Irish immigrant.

It was just a weird, horrid, fucked up thing that happened to someone that was genuinely good. I am not sure what the point of this story is, other than that the patient(I) was forgotten as business sides of health care fought over money, and it took a headstrong doctor to bitchslap them into submission. My mother wouldn't have been able to afford what it would have cost to treat me. He basically kept us out of falling into poverty.

Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: The Dark Shake 3000 on April 17, 2010, 05:13:00 AM
So what, you think health care reform is good? Why are you being such an asshole? Can't you tell other people don't agree with you?

Sorry, Eel :'(
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: The Dark Shake 3000 on April 17, 2010, 05:22:11 AM
Dare I say it...annihilated? :lol

But seriously, enough about Eel's money woes. This is a thread about Tea Partyers and Quentin Tarantino's disturbing foot fetish, damn it!
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Eel O'Brian on April 17, 2010, 06:42:43 AM
I know I'm late on this, but do you do the estimated payment plan Eel? I learned that when I paid my huge tax sum one year. Someone suggested it, now I'm throwing payments at the IRS to keep them at bay, giving more when JESUS decides to grace me with extra funds. I was told this by someone who works for themself - "Never pay all at once. Everyone who is in this industry does payments." You can pay as low as $50/mo even

I guess I could do a little bit of that, depending.  The main reason that I hesitate to do so and just pay in a lump is that what I earn fluctuates wildly throughout certain parts of the year.  I make a good 70% of my yearly income from the months of May-August.  The worst months are Dec-Feb, so I have to plan ahead with any savings from the Summer to float me through those months.  Last year was especially weird, and it stayed pretty dead around here until July, when I got slammed for two months.  I had to hire a friend for a couple of weeks to catch up, which ended up working out well for him since he was out of work at the time, and it helped me out, but I would have rather had the money considering the year as a whole sucked.  After August it flattened out again, even worse than usual.  Right now I never really know what's coming from month to month.
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Eel O'Brian on April 17, 2010, 06:56:55 AM
That's also how I got personally clued in as to how bad the economy is/was.  The apartment complex I contract out to has a dozen empties sitting there right now, all painted/maintenanced/cleaned and ready to go.  People aren't moving, and when they're trying their credit sucks and the application goes on top of the huge reject pile the leasing girl has in a box underneath her desk.

also, believe it or not i used to be just like shake and cheebs

and then the second year i was in business i got my first vaguely threatening letter from the irs and thought "wait a fuckin' minute, you want more?!?!?"

Anyway, according to established thread rules maybe when I get cancer from breathing in paint dust for a dozen years and still don't have health care I'll have met the criteria and get a couple of protest signs thrown my way :lol
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Ichirou on April 17, 2010, 08:32:30 AM
i used to be just like shake and cheebs

 :o
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: pollo on April 17, 2010, 08:49:04 AM
I know I'm late on this, but do you do the estimated payment plan Eel? I learned that when I paid my huge tax sum one year. Someone suggested it, now I'm throwing payments at the IRS to keep them at bay, giving more when JESUS decides to grace me with extra funds. I was told this by someone who works for themself - "Never pay all at once. Everyone who is in this industry does payments." You can pay as low as $50/mo even

I guess I could do a little bit of that, depending.  The main reason that I hesitate to do so and just pay in a lump is that what I earn fluctuates wildly throughout certain parts of the year.  I make a good 70% of my yearly income from the months of May-August.  The worst months are Dec-Feb, so I have to plan ahead with any savings from the Summer to float me through those months.  Last year was especially weird, and it stayed pretty dead around here until July, when I got slammed for two months.  I had to hire a friend for a couple of weeks to catch up, which ended up working out well for him since he was out of work at the time, and it helped me out, but I would have rather had the money considering the year as a whole sucked.  After August it flattened out again, even worse than usual.  Right now I never really know what's coming from month to month.

Heh dude, that's why you pay taxes when you have the cash. Ever hear of EFTPS?

http://www.irs.gov/efile/article/0,,id=98005,00.html

This shit is gold nicca, just pay whenever you can! Quarterly, Monthly, Weekly, whenever. If you've got more cash in hand at a given moment you should just set aside some of that money to pay to the gov't. This way you don't ever have to pay the gov't more than you have to.
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Olivia Wilde Homo on April 17, 2010, 09:06:37 AM
I heard Cheebs secretly likes the recession because it means shorter wait times at Starbucks  :shh
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Kestastrophe on April 17, 2010, 09:07:57 AM
Internet martyr. :bow
for the record, I called it first

http://www.evilbore.com/forum/index.php?topic=33944.msg1098526#msg1098526 (http://www.evilbore.com/forum/index.php?topic=33944.msg1098526#msg1098526)
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: The Fake Shemp on April 17, 2010, 10:41:43 AM
Willco: The bill is better than a status quo, and you'd be hard pressed to find many people who would disagree with the fact that democrats threw nearly every cost bending idea into the bill, except the public option of course. The CBO numbers speak for themselves. I notice you make the same criticism of the bill in every discussion of it, but it's simply not true.

The CBO numbers have nothing to do with health care costs; the CBO numbers reiterate it will cut government spending, much of it in the forms of cuts to programs already in existence. Even then, the CBO itself is unsure if all the Medicare savings will come to fruition:

Quote from: CBO
"It is unclear whether such a reduction in the growth rate of [Medicare] spending could be achieved, and if so, whether it would be accomplished through greater efficiencies in the delivery of health care or through reductions in access to care or the quality of care," the agency says in its report.

Way to refute my points by saying, "Well, hey, that's just not true!"

Saying that the Democrats threw in every cost bending idea - which is not true - other than the ones that would, y'know, actually cut costs, shows how little you actually care about the real debate.

The exchange is the only thing that could theoretically cut costs, and a lot of that is in theory. The risk pools could be too small, and without a viable public option, the likelihood is that insurers that operate on profit won't have any incentive to offer low-priced plans on the exchange. The exchange was originally created to force insurers to compete with a federal plan, and that's why it would have worked. That's not the case anymore.

I already linked to the recent report that the industry is already fudging numbers in order to meet federal guidelines, but pad their profit margins. Not to mention that the health care industry saw stock prices surge as the bill passed, showing more confidence by investors that they will continue to make a killing off of us dying.

Like I said, it has a great deal of positive consumer protections loaded within it, but the bill doesn't really address costs. It's a watered down piece of legislation that barely passes as reform, and I believe will put us on a path that will inevitably lead to a single-payer system when everyone realizes, "Hey, wait a minute, this isn't really working."
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Van Cruncheon on April 17, 2010, 11:55:31 AM
I think in Willco and Mandark's mind you're still a first-year college student or something.

It seems that way.

Some here REFUSE to accept I am not some 16 year old kid living in my parents basement.  You may disagree with me, you may think my views are fucking stupid but stop acting like I am a kid who hasn't lived life, you have very little idea of any details of my life. Disagree and mock my views but stop actin like you've lived life and thus are more informed to have views.

I mean it's not like Willco is some wise old career man, he is in his mid-20's living pay check to pay check. Most people over 40 would see him just as much as a  innocent "kid" as shake.


then stop posting like a 16-year-old child
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Eel O'Brian on April 17, 2010, 11:57:42 AM
I know I'm late on this, but do you do the estimated payment plan Eel? I learned that when I paid my huge tax sum one year. Someone suggested it, now I'm throwing payments at the IRS to keep them at bay, giving more when JESUS decides to grace me with extra funds. I was told this by someone who works for themself - "Never pay all at once. Everyone who is in this industry does payments." You can pay as low as $50/mo even

I guess I could do a little bit of that, depending.  The main reason that I hesitate to do so and just pay in a lump is that what I earn fluctuates wildly throughout certain parts of the year.  I make a good 70% of my yearly income from the months of May-August.  The worst months are Dec-Feb, so I have to plan ahead with any savings from the Summer to float me through those months.  Last year was especially weird, and it stayed pretty dead around here until July, when I got slammed for two months.  I had to hire a friend for a couple of weeks to catch up, which ended up working out well for him since he was out of work at the time, and it helped me out, but I would have rather had the money considering the year as a whole sucked.  After August it flattened out again, even worse than usual.  Right now I never really know what's coming from month to month.

Heh dude, that's why you pay taxes when you have the cash. Ever hear of EFTPS?

http://www.irs.gov/efile/article/0,,id=98005,00.html

This shit is gold distinguished black fellow, just pay whenever you can! Quarterly, Monthly, Weekly, whenever. If you've got more cash in hand at a given moment you should just set aside some of that money to pay to the gov't. This way you don't ever have to pay the gov't more than you have to.

well, that's what i was saying, i never really know when i'm gonna be shit broke for a month and need to rely on the money from the healthier months
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: tiesto on April 17, 2010, 12:01:03 PM
Some pics my friend took while at the local tea party:

(http://hphotos-sjc1.fbcdn.net/hs089.snc3/15713_10150176778130004_710890003_11712506_4994363_n.jpg)

(http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc3/hs109.snc3/15713_10150176757935004_710890003_11712239_3161779_n.jpg)

(http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc3/hs089.snc3/15713_10150176755510004_710890003_11712214_8242551_n.jpg)
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Diunx on April 17, 2010, 12:05:24 PM
One
Big
Awful
Mistake
America

:rofl :rofl :rofl
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Eel O'Brian on April 17, 2010, 12:06:58 PM
for the record and on-topic, i personally think all that shit is a waste of time and money

if i had the money to travel to washington (or wherever) and hold up a sign like a jackass all day long, i probably wouldn't be complaining at all
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: EmCeeGrammar on April 17, 2010, 12:59:53 PM
One
Big
Awful
Mistake
America

:rofl :rofl :rofl

This is probably the only creative sign I've seen.  Its adorable!
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: The Dark Shake 3000 on April 17, 2010, 01:03:34 PM
If you guys want to argue about health care, you do realize there's an existing thread? At least tiesto is trying to keep things relevant to the original topic :'(
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: EmCeeGrammar on April 17, 2010, 01:35:22 PM
I imagine most of us don't keep tabs on the crazies so we can crash their protests.  Nothing to share, sorry ! ^_^!
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Phoenix Dark on April 17, 2010, 03:08:50 PM
Willco: The bill is better than a status quo, and you'd be hard pressed to find many people who would disagree with the fact that democrats threw nearly every cost bending idea into the bill, except the public option of course. The CBO numbers speak for themselves. I notice you make the same criticism of the bill in every discussion of it, but it's simply not true.

The CBO numbers have nothing to do with health care costs; the CBO numbers reiterate it will cut government spending, much of it in the forms of cuts to programs already in existence. Even then, the CBO itself is unsure if all the Medicare savings will come to fruition:

Quote from: CBO
"It is unclear whether such a reduction in the growth rate of [Medicare] spending could be achieved, and if so, whether it would be accomplished through greater efficiencies in the delivery of health care or through reductions in access to care or the quality of care," the agency says in its report.

Way to refute my points by saying, "Well, hey, that's just not true!"

Saying that the Democrats threw in every cost bending idea - which is not true - other than the ones that would, y'know, actually cut costs, shows how little you actually care about the real debate.

The exchange is the only thing that could theoretically cut costs, and a lot of that is in theory. The risk pools could be too small, and without a viable public option, the likelihood is that insurers that operate on profit won't have any incentive to offer low-priced plans on the exchange. The exchange was originally created to force insurers to compete with a federal plan, and that's why it would have worked. That's not the case anymore.

I already linked to the recent report that the industry is already fudging numbers in order to meet federal guidelines, but pad their profit margins. Not to mention that the health care industry saw stock prices surge as the bill passed, showing more confidence by investors that they will continue to make a killing off of us dying.

Like I said, it has a great deal of positive consumer protections loaded within it, but the bill doesn't really address costs. It's a watered down piece of legislation that barely passes as reform, and I believe will put us on a path that will inevitably lead to a single-payer system when everyone realizes, "Hey, wait a minute, this isn't really working."

I get the impression you don't know much about what's in the actual bill, nor did you follow the debate closely. Suggesting the exchanges are the only cost cutting mechanism in the bill is not true. The CBO report was more than a study of the bill's effect on the budget, it also addressed premiums; nearly every iteration of the bill was shown to lower premiums for small businesses and people in small markets, with premiums remaining the same for most upper class individuals.

But in terms of cost cutting measures
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/03/the_five_most_promising_cost_c.html

Quote
The bill's basic theory is to try pretty much everything in the hopes that some of it works out. The net effect is to make reform a continuous, rather than occasional, process, with different cost cops patrolling different beats. Insurers will have to work to stay a step ahead of the excise tax because employers won't want to buy plans that trigger it. The industries that provide medical care and technologies will have to hold their costs down because they don't want to become a target for the Medicare Commission. Hospitals will need to make sure they don't spend more than their competitors because they'll lose money under bundling. And if we want to try other things -- a public option, say, or incentives for insurers to abandon fee-for-service -- the exchanges give us an actual structure where we can make changes and test reforms.

The public option is not the only cost cutting measure, and you can argue the exchanges will cut costs more considering they will be available to more people. And of course, states can create their own public options under the bill. It's a Frankenstein of cost cutting attempts.

http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/107xx/doc10781/11-30-Premiums.pdf
(graph on page 6)

This report focuses on the subsidies, so the benefit of the exchanges and other mechanics listed by Klein aren't taken into account, so you're looking at even lower premiums. Also, this report is the evidence used by conservatives to declare the bill raises premiums when in reality

Quote
Lamar Alexander and Barack Obama just had a contentious exchange on this point, so it's worth settling the issue: Yes, the CBO found health-care reform would reduce premiums. The issue gets confused because it also found that access to subsidies would encourage people to buy more comprehensive insurance, which would mean that the value of their insurance would be higher after reform than before it. But that's not the same as insurance becoming more expensive: The fact that I could buy a nicer car after getting a better job suggests that cars are becoming pricier. The bottom line is that if you're comparing two plans that are exactly the same, costs go down after reform.

You can find a full rundown of the report here.
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/02/did_the_congressional_budget_o_1.html

Finally an interesting point on rate hikes, something I was worried about. I mean, if so much of the bill goes into effect in later years, what would stop insurers from simply hiking rates now
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/03/will_private_insurers_raise_ra.html

Admission to the exchanges would also serve as a deterrent; try to jack prices, lose admission to pools of customers.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Donono on April 17, 2010, 04:17:10 PM
obama pussied out on the public option, and single-payer was never even on the table because of everyone squawking SOCIALISM

Seriously.  They need to just revamp Medicare and make it for everyone.

Obama should've just kicked Lieberman right in the fucking nut-sack.
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Brehvolution on April 17, 2010, 04:42:16 PM
Lieberman's wife is a lobbyist for Aetna. She'd make him sleep on the couch.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Cheebs on April 17, 2010, 10:16:58 PM
obama pussied out on the public option, and single-payer was never even on the table because of everyone squawking SOCIALISM

Seriously.  They need to just revamp Medicare and make it for everyone.

Obama should've just kicked Lieberman right in the fucking nut-sack.
And he wouldn't have gotten it passed congress. They needed Lieberman. They were able to use reconciliation for the fixes but reconciliation could not  be used for the entire package. You can't use reconciliation for any bill you want. There are a lot of restrictions on what type of bills it is allowed to be used for. When you have 60 (now 59) seats and you need at least 60 to get anything meaningful done then you gotta keep Lieberman on board, sucks it does but without him Dems wouldn't have gotten any health care bill passed.

Saying "he pussied out" or "should have kicked lieberman right in the fucking balls" ignores how hard and messy getting bills passed through congress is. The law that is passed is the only law that could have been passed in this congress. Anything more liberal and congress would have crumbled and we would have got nothing. And the bill does far too much good for far too many people despite not going as far as any of us would have liked to pick the status quo over it.
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Bloodwake on April 17, 2010, 10:47:27 PM
Eel, sorry dude. Sounds like you are getting assfucked by the government.

And I was pissed because I owed the government five bucks for back taxes this year. Heh. Puts things in perspective.
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Cheebs on April 18, 2010, 12:47:21 AM
FDR would spit in your face.
FDR had far larger congressional majorities.
Title: Re: Angry White People vs. The City of New York
Post by: Phoenix Dark on April 18, 2010, 02:23:17 AM
obama pussied out on the public option, and single-payer was never even on the table because of everyone squawking SOCIALISM

Seriously.  They need to just revamp Medicare and make it for everyone.

Obama should've just kicked Lieberman right in the fucking nut-sack.
And he wouldn't have gotten it passed congress. They needed Lieberman. They were able to use reconciliation for the fixes but reconciliation could not  be used for the entire package. You can't use reconciliation for any bill you want. There are a lot of restrictions on what type of bills it is allowed to be used for. When you have 60 (now 59) seats and you need at least 60 to get anything meaningful done then you gotta keep Lieberman on board, sucks it does but without him Dems wouldn't have gotten any health care bill passed.

Saying "he pussied out" or "should have kicked lieberman right in the fucking balls" ignores how hard and messy getting bills passed through congress is. The law that is passed is the only law that could have been passed in this congress. Anything more liberal and congress would have crumbled and we would have got nothing. And the bill does far too much good for far too many people despite not going as far as any of us would have liked to pick the status quo over it.

Sorry, Obama and senate democrats can't be given a pass for the public option failing. The senate leadership said many times that they had 50 votes for a public option, but not 60; this of course was before the Scott Brown election. Once reconciliation was on the table, and the public option actually seemed attainable, democrat leadership folded. All of a sudden Durdin didn't have the votes, Rockerfeller declared he wouldn't support one, Obama actively began campaigning against it, etc.

IMO by the end of the process the public options on the table were so weak they weren't worth the hype, and the exchanges were more effective. I'm more annoyed dems used it to whip up the base, and fled the second it actually came within reach.
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Cheebs on April 18, 2010, 09:36:39 AM
I think liberals go to to obsessed with the public option. They seemed to grasp onto it like it was true single payer, it really wouldn't have changed the bill THAT much. It would have been nice and an improvement but it was not worth risking the bill over. It was no single payer. If Harry Reid thought it would have without a doubt passed he would have put it in the final package and the bill barely passed as is with out it, he was a supporter of the public option remember.
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Phoenix Dark on April 18, 2010, 02:12:39 PM
Durbin and others said they had 50 votes, and a junior senator passed around a public option support letter that got nearly 40 signatures. Democrats made a calculated moved to kill it, and they were given cover by Obama's initial silence then his remarks at rallies that claimed the public option wasn't a good idea. I think it's pretty clear that the WH didn't want a public option, nor did many top senators who had once championed it.

The bill allows states to create their own public options though, and the infrastructure is in place to create a national one later. I can see it happening in a decade
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Cheebs on April 18, 2010, 06:05:52 PM
Durbin and others said they had 50 votes, and a junior senator passed around a public option support letter that got nearly 40 signatures. Democrats made a calculated moved to kill it, and they were given cover by Obama's initial silence then his remarks at rallies that claimed the public option wasn't a good idea. I think it's pretty clear that the WH didn't want a public option, nor did many top senators who had once championed it.

The bill allows states to create their own public options though, and the infrastructure is in place to create a national one later. I can see it happening in a decade
Yep, this bill is far from the end but it was a very important first step. Social Security was improved after passage, same will be the same with this.
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Ichirou on April 18, 2010, 10:33:38 PM
You guys have both made some excellent points.  I'm still waiting for Willco's rebuttal.
Title: Re: Angry White People Post On Evilbore
Post by: Yeti on April 20, 2010, 07:33:29 PM
One
Big
Awful
Mistake
America

:rofl :rofl :rofl

One
Bad
Ass
Mother- Shut yo' mouth!
Ah'm only talkin' about Barack