THE BORE

General => Video Game Bored => Topic started by: Herr Mafflard on November 03, 2011, 05:32:05 PM

Title: Gearbox: DNF wasn't reviewed fairly; Not sure where the animosity came from
Post by: Herr Mafflard on November 03, 2011, 05:32:05 PM
from co-founder Brian Martel, who then made his case by comparing Duke Nukem Forever (2011), to Half-Life (1998)

lulz here

Quote
Speaking to Eurogamer in a previously unpublished interview conducted at Gamescom in August, Martel reflected on the controversial shooter's critical reception, stating: "We wish the reviews were a little less caustic. We're not quite sure where some of the anger came from."

Asked if that meant he didn't think, broadly speaking, that the game was reviewed fairly, he replied: "I think that if we were going to review the reviews fairly, no." He suggested that part of the problem was that "a certain amount of gamers today are not used to" a game in the style of Duke Nuke Forever. "It was what it was meant to be, which is a more old-school style game in what is today's technology".

To emphasise the point, Martel compared the game to classic Valve FPS Half-Life. "We've had this internal debate," he revealed. "Would Half-Life today be reviewed as highly as it is, you know, even today? As a new IP coming out with the same sort of mechanics Half-Life had.
"I think we all have a nostalgia and love for that particular brand. Obviously Gearbox got its start working on Opposing Force so we love Half-Life. But is the current gamer, would they have the same love for that? It'd be interesting. I think the same kind of thing happened with Duke."
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2011-11-03-gearbox-duke-nukem-forever-wasnt-reviewed-fairly

WOULD CURRENT GAMERS LIKE HALF-LIFE AS MUCH NOW? I'M NOT SURE

WOULD CURRENT HAIR STYLISTS LIKE 80's MULLETS AS MUCH NOW? I'M NOT SURE

IS KIRSTY ALLEY STILL HOT?

(http://i.imgur.com/D8bOr.jpg)

I'M NOT SURE
Title: Re: Gearbox: DNF wasn't reviewed fairly; Not sure where the animosity came from
Post by: Bebpo on November 03, 2011, 05:45:01 PM
This controversy is about as exciting as the game was  :zzz
Title: Re: Gearbox: DNF wasn't reviewed fairly; Not sure where the animosity came from
Post by: Bebpo on November 03, 2011, 05:46:02 PM
Also, why is that the "zzz" icon?  What part of that signals someone sleeping because of boredom?  The guy is happy and smiling with a pimp fro.

Title: Re: Gearbox: DNF wasn't reviewed fairly; Not sure where the animosity came from
Post by: Howard Alan Treesong on November 03, 2011, 06:10:39 PM
...he's not sleeping...
Title: Re: Gearbox: DNF wasn't reviewed fairly; Not sure where the animosity came from
Post by: Bebpo on November 03, 2011, 06:14:07 PM
But "zzz" indicates snoring because something is so dull it put you to sleep mid-sentence.
Title: Re: Gearbox: DNF wasn't reviewed fairly; Not sure where the animosity came from
Post by: Howard Alan Treesong on November 03, 2011, 06:30:35 PM
it means he's "relaxed," brah
Title: Re: Gearbox: DNF wasn't reviewed fairly; Not sure where the animosity came from
Post by: Herr Mafflard on November 03, 2011, 06:46:15 PM
This controversy is about as exciting as the game was  (http://i.imgur.com/XSkIr.gif)

fix't
Title: Re: Gearbox: DNF wasn't reviewed fairly; Not sure where the animosity came from
Post by: chronovore on November 03, 2011, 06:47:02 PM
Any time a game is updated from a previous incarnation, invariably there are going to be comparisons made. It's inherent. However, those expectations can be mapped to a continuum.

On one end, purists who just want to see the original game on their current console, with no improvements. On the other, people who are expecting a completely updated game, with all the amenities and contrivances of other new games. Most of the people cheering for the game at announcement are likely of the former category, or perhaps are wishing for updated graphics and internet-enabled multiplayer.

The truth is, in order to be considered a success in today's market, the current, mainstream audiences must be successfully engaged, and the original buyers are either not in that set, or are only a very minor subset of that target group. The FPS market has evolved so much in the intervening time, even in the limited sense of singleplayer campaigns, that the latter point on the continuum must be targeted. Nostalgia can only serve so far.

tl;dr version: Yeah, Half-Life would flop, if placed against current competition. But the current titles are only here because of Half-Life's past success.
Title: Re: Gearbox: DNF wasn't reviewed fairly; Not sure where the animosity came from
Post by: Shaka Khan on November 03, 2011, 06:47:05 PM
Quick:

When rotated like this...

(http://i.imgur.com/R4xDO.jpg)

What does Kristy remind you of?
Title: Re: Gearbox: DNF wasn't reviewed fairly; Not sure where the animosity came from
Post by: chronovore on November 03, 2011, 07:00:09 PM
A certain Herman Melville novel?
Title: Re: Gearbox: DNF wasn't reviewed fairly; Not sure where the animosity came from
Post by: Herr Mafflard on November 03, 2011, 07:13:09 PM
Cthulhu? Barry Humphries?

DNF satisfied neither purists, nor 'current gamers', because it was a terrible game.

DNF's best bit was the janky, first-person platforming section. In any other game, that section would be an affront to the notion decent gameplay. In DNF, it's the best level.
Title: Re: Gearbox: DNF wasn't reviewed fairly; Not sure where the animosity came from
Post by: Bebpo on November 03, 2011, 07:13:16 PM
it means he's "relaxed," brah

Is this real?

I've been using zzz for years to signify boredom.  Don't tell me I've been using the wrong emoticon forever!
Title: Re: Gearbox: DNF wasn't reviewed fairly; Not sure where the animosity came from
Post by: Great Rumbler on November 03, 2011, 07:13:55 PM
So, he's basically admitting that his game came out more than a decade after it stopped being relevant to modern gaming? Sounds about right.
Title: Re: Gearbox: DNF wasn't reviewed fairly; Not sure where the animosity came from
Post by: Shaka Khan on November 03, 2011, 07:15:44 PM
A certain Herman Melville novel?

Cthulhu? Barry Humphries?

No, a whale, sillies.
Title: Re: Gearbox: DNF wasn't reviewed fairly; Not sure where the animosity came from
Post by: chronovore on November 03, 2011, 07:52:39 PM
A certain Herman Melville novel?

Cthulhu? Barry Humphries?

No, a whale, sillies.

Shah, please feel free to google "Herman Melville" and maybe "novel"...  :-*
Title: Re: Gearbox: DNF wasn't reviewed fairly; Not sure where the animosity came from
Post by: Shaka Khan on November 03, 2011, 08:02:32 PM
:lol

I gotta admit, my eyes weren't scanning for such a detour, but I like it.

And now I feel dumb :(
Title: Re: Gearbox: DNF wasn't reviewed fairly; Not sure where the animosity came from
Post by: chronovore on November 04, 2011, 01:12:05 AM
If it had been a Nabokov reference, I could have got Kosma and Fistful in one swoop!
Title: Re: Gearbox: DNF wasn't reviewed fairly; Not sure where the animosity came from
Post by: Stoney Mason on November 04, 2011, 02:50:32 AM
If they had sold the game for a reduced price. Like $40 dollars or something, I think the review tone also would have improved. I mean it still wouldn't have gotten good reviews but it would have seemed like less of a greedy cash grab.
Title: Re: Gearbox: DNF wasn't reviewed fairly; Not sure where the animosity came from
Post by: Trent Dole on November 04, 2011, 03:16:07 AM
The three different SKUs of this have an average score of 51 on metacritic, sounds fair to me. :poop
Title: Re: Gearbox: DNF wasn't reviewed fairly; Not sure where the animosity came from
Post by: recursivelyenumerable on November 04, 2011, 03:34:30 AM
80s mullets were amazing for their time. Of course they look less impressive to modern eyes thanks to 30 years of advancements in hairstyle technology, but much like Steve Jobs and Dennis Ritchie, the "magical" hairstyles of today could've never come about without standing on their forebears' giant shoulders. Or scalps, or something.