(http://i.imgur.com/73vsv.png)
NO ONE CARES
What was wrong with it other then the story, pacing, and the fact that it was a GoW clone?First game was great.
Well, I know to now ignore everything you say from now on. Thanks.
NO ONE CARES
.
No one would like the first game if not for theThe twist ending was terribly stupid and came out of nowhere. I guess the dlc made it make sense, but thats not in the game I have. Still I liked it. I don't care about Castlevannia and this was a fun GoW clone that was more enjoyable then GoW. Fun gameplay, outstanding graphics with beautiful environments. The only real problem was that it was terribly paced, but eh I played it over a long period time so I never felt like I got bogged down by it's length..spoiler (click to show/hide)twist ending[close]
.First game was great.
Well, I know to now ignore everything you say from now on. Thanks.
wooooo everything moves in 7fpsDid you play the PS3 version. Sure it had frame drops here and there, but nothing that bad. People claimed the game had frame rate problems, but I don't really remember any real problems.
What was wrong with it other then the story, pacing, and the fact that it was a GoW clone?First game was great.
Well, I know to now ignore everything you say from now on. Thanks.
No. I don't care if an action game has a bad story. Zone of the Enders 2 has a terrible one as well. Still a great game. Pacing did'nt bother me, because the game was still fun and filled with at least pretty visuals. And well being a GoW clone and not a real Castlevannia dosent mean much to me since I don't know or care what a real Castlevannia is. Game might as well be a new ip. Regardless, I still know that the developers were aiming for GoW and well I think they did better since I dislike GoW anyway.What was wrong with it other then the story, pacing, and the fact that it was a GoW clone?First game was great.
Well, I know to now ignore everything you say from now on. Thanks.
Ironic post?
No. I don't care if an action game has a bad story. Zone of the Enders 2 has a terrible one as well. Still a great game. Pacing did'nt bother me, because the game was still fun and filled with at least pretty visuals. And well being a GoW clone and not a real Castlevannia dosent mean much to me since I don't know or care what a real Castlevannia is. Game might as well be a new ip. Regardless, I still know that the developers were aiming for GoW and well I think they did better since I dislike GoW anyway.What was wrong with it other then the story, pacing, and the fact that it was a GoW clone?First game was great.
Well, I know to now ignore everything you say from now on. Thanks.
Ironic post?
Well why is'nt it good?No. I don't care if an action game has a bad story. Zone of the Enders 2 has a terrible one as well. Still a great game. Pacing did'nt bother me, because the game was still fun and filled with at least pretty visuals. And well being a GoW clone and not a real Castlevannia dosent mean much to me since I don't know or care what a real Castlevannia is. Game might as well be a new ip. Regardless, I still know that the developers were aiming for GoW and well I think they did better since I dislike GoW anyway.What was wrong with it other then the story, pacing, and the fact that it was a GoW clone?First game was great.
Well, I know to now ignore everything you say from now on. Thanks.
Ironic post?
I don't care about those elements either, but it's not good by any stretch of the imagination that is my issue good sir!
Well why is'nt it good?No. I don't care if an action game has a bad story. Zone of the Enders 2 has a terrible one as well. Still a great game. Pacing did'nt bother me, because the game was still fun and filled with at least pretty visuals. And well being a GoW clone and not a real Castlevannia dosent mean much to me since I don't know or care what a real Castlevannia is. Game might as well be a new ip. Regardless, I still know that the developers were aiming for GoW and well I think they did better since I dislike GoW anyway.What was wrong with it other then the story, pacing, and the fact that it was a GoW clone?First game was great.
Well, I know to now ignore everything you say from now on. Thanks.
Ironic post?
I don't care about those elements either, but it's not good by any stretch of the imagination that is my issue good sir!
Well I just think the hp of the enemies played into using the games light and dark magic a lot, which to me was a nice addition to combat. It made me try and avoid as much as I could because I needed as much dark magic as possible. It added some tension to combat. Maybe that is just me dealing with a crappy thing, but I enjoyed it. I also think the game had enough moves to deal it, so I never say it as a problem.Well why is'nt it good?No. I don't care if an action game has a bad story. Zone of the Enders 2 has a terrible one as well. Still a great game. Pacing did'nt bother me, because the game was still fun and filled with at least pretty visuals. And well being a GoW clone and not a real Castlevannia dosent mean much to me since I don't know or care what a real Castlevannia is. Game might as well be a new ip. Regardless, I still know that the developers were aiming for GoW and well I think they did better since I dislike GoW anyway.What was wrong with it other then the story, pacing, and the fact that it was a GoW clone?First game was great.
Well, I know to now ignore everything you say from now on. Thanks.
Ironic post?
I don't care about those elements either, but it's not good by any stretch of the imagination that is my issue good sir!
It's a terrible amalgam of terrible hp sink enemies, shitty shadow of the colossus-esque boss fights, bad auto platflorming and to top off this shit sandwich is the very nutty creamy green apple splatter sub 20fps framerate.
Well I just think the hp of the enemies played into using the games light and dark magic a lot, which to me was a nice addition to combat. It made me try and avoid as much as I could because I needed as much dark magic as possible. It added some tension to combat. Maybe that is just me dealing with a crappy thing, but I enjoyed it. I also think the game had enough moves to deal it, so I never say it as a problem.Well why is'nt it good?No. I don't care if an action game has a bad story. Zone of the Enders 2 has a terrible one as well. Still a great game. Pacing did'nt bother me, because the game was still fun and filled with at least pretty visuals. And well being a GoW clone and not a real Castlevannia dosent mean much to me since I don't know or care what a real Castlevannia is. Game might as well be a new ip. Regardless, I still know that the developers were aiming for GoW and well I think they did better since I dislike GoW anyway.What was wrong with it other then the story, pacing, and the fact that it was a GoW clone?First game was great.
Well, I know to now ignore everything you say from now on. Thanks.
Ironic post?
I don't care about those elements either, but it's not good by any stretch of the imagination that is my issue good sir!
It's a terrible amalgam of terrible hp sink enemies, shitty shadow of the colossus-esque boss fights, bad auto platflorming and to top off this shit sandwich is the very nutty creamy green apple splatter sub 20fps framerate.
While I can SOTC rip-off enemies as a problem. I don't really count them as they were just kind of there. I mean there was no difficulty to them and because of no stamina gauge, they lacked anything coming close to frustrating gameplay ,but I guess also lack of tension and well real player involvement. But to be honest SOTC's gameplay isn't why I like the game. I like it, in spite of the gameplay and because of the spectacle and idea of scaling the colosi. So the SOTC rip-off stuff still have the scale and visual coolness so I see no harm done.
The auto-platforming. Well I see nothing wrong here. It doesn't go to the depths of Enslaved and still feels like an actual game really. If anything I would complain about is the strange jumping. Either way I enjoyed it, if only because the enviorments are great looking, but honestly, call me crazy but I thought they did a good job with using the powers you gained over the course of the game and mixing them into the platforming. I remember the last level being extremely good with it's kind of platforming puzzles.
Either way, it was a good base game imo and I think it can only go up.
:rofl
Lyte's on fire today!
The game was so fucking bad. I suffer through a lot of mediocre/bad games that I sink time into just to see them through to the end, but even I bailed at Drac's castle. Game was long, the combat sucked, the camera sucked, the framerate sucked, the platforming sucked. tedious, tedious, tedious. One of the worst games I've played in recent years and I love GoW and generic shallow beat-em-ups.
I mean I'm still playing Alan Wake even though it's FFXIII's twin brother of corridor running no-gameplay boredom. But at least that's got some ok things going for it and very little obnoxiously terrible. LoS was extremely in your face awful. Fuck that game.
I never finished the first game, the ice giant boss thing pissed me off and I've never gone back to try again.
Doritos Pope is the greatest meme of 2012, real talk.
"Legitimate gaming journalist" is as big an oxymoron as saying that Nicki Minaj is a legitimate rapper. :-\
Doritos Pope is the greatest meme of 2012, real talk.I know nothing about it...
How gaf liked this game is beyond my understanding.