Great review. 10/10, would read again.
"- holy fuck this film is black power defined "
white guy frees him and sets everything into motion manipulating the black man for his own ends?
sure sounds like black power defined to me.
The Klan scene is probably the funnest scene I've witnessed in theatres this year. Absolutely amazing.
The Klan scene is probably the funnest scene I've witnessed in theatres this year. Absolutely amazing.
Did I just say I would shoot up a theater full of black people? What's wrong with me? :(:lol
I can't tolerate a black audience or a Tarantino film separately. Combined, I might shoot up a theater.Hahaha
I cannot stop thinking about this movie. Best black film in years.(http://cdn.fd.uproxx.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/TARANTINO-FISTPUMP.GIF)
Did I just say I would shoot up a theater full of black people? What's wrong with me? :(
Black power is acceptance and embracing of ones blackness. Tell me how that ending is not black power as fuck.
Great review. 10/10, would read again.
Sam Jackson steals the show but all the actors brought it. It even made Jamie look good.
Anyone who says Django takes slavery lightly is a fucking idiot. They had face masks, they were whipped Kunta Kinte style, there were castrations, attack dogs...Spike Lee is a fucking idiot. "Insulting to my ancestors" my ass.
Movie is hilarious as all hell too.
Great acting, fantastic commentary on America and race, fucking awesome western, and the most ill soundtrack I've seen in ages.
"- holy fuck this film is black power defined "
white guy frees him and sets everything into motion manipulating the black man for his own ends?
sure sounds like black power defined to me.
http://www.wnd.com/2012/12/black-racism-unchained/#CksjHmmczyvE3PQ7.99
“I’ve often said that, ‘Thank God for slavery,’ because, you know, had not, then the blacks over here would have been stuck in Africa… Everybody and their Mama are trying to get out of Africa and come to America and so God has a way of looking out for folks and He made it possible by way of slavery to get black folks into this country.
…I thank God that He saw fit for me to get here. Never mind that, you know, (my ancestors) were sold… by Arabs and blacks to white folks… The ride over was pretty tough but you know, it’s like riding on a crowded airplane when you’re not in First Class. It’s a tough ride. But you’re happy when you get to your desitination… I thank God that he got me here and to show my appreciation to the blacks who suffered as the result of coming here, and Arabs and blacks who sold us to the white man, the white man for going there and getting us and bringing us here, I want to say, ‘Thanks.’”
He's -- Obama, in all honesty, is the Congressional Black Caucus, he is Louis Farrakhan, he is Rev. Wright, his minister, he is all of them wrapped up in one -- and he's gonna take -- if we allow this health-care thing to happen, he's gonna turn America into Detroit. And we cannot let this happen.
About five years ago, in a debate before the National Association of Black Journalists, I stated that if whites were to just leave the United States and let blacks run the country, they would turn America into a ghetto within 10 years. The audience, shall we say, disagreed with me strongly. Now I have to disagree with me. I gave blacks too much credit. It took a mere three days for blacks to turn the Superdome and the convention center into ghettos, rampant with theft, rape and murder.
http://www.wnd.com/2012/12/black-racism-unchained/#CksjHmmczyvE3PQ7.99
Some other choice quotes from Jesse Lee Peterson:Quote from: http://www.newshounds.us/hannity_buddy_thanks_god_for_slavery_03112012“I’ve often said that, ‘Thank God for slavery,’ because, you know, had not, then the blacks over here would have been stuck in Africa… Everybody and their Mama are trying to get out of Africa and come to America and so God has a way of looking out for folks and He made it possible by way of slavery to get black folks into this country.
…I thank God that He saw fit for me to get here. Never mind that, you know, (my ancestors) were sold… by Arabs and blacks to white folks… The ride over was pretty tough but you know, it’s like riding on a crowded airplane when you’re not in First Class. It’s a tough ride. But you’re happy when you get to your desitination… I thank God that he got me here and to show my appreciation to the blacks who suffered as the result of coming here, and Arabs and blacks who sold us to the white man, the white man for going there and getting us and bringing us here, I want to say, ‘Thanks.’”Quote from: http://crooksandliars.com/david-neiwert/worldnetdailys-peterson-unleashes-nuHe's -- Obama, in all honesty, is the Congressional Black Caucus, he is Louis Farrakhan, he is Rev. Wright, his minister, he is all of them wrapped up in one -- and he's gonna take -- if we allow this health-care thing to happen, he's gonna turn America into Detroit. And we cannot let this happen.Quote from: http://www.wnd.com/2005/09/32454/About five years ago, in a debate before the National Association of Black Journalists, I stated that if whites were to just leave the United States and let blacks run the country, they would turn America into a ghetto within 10 years. The audience, shall we say, disagreed with me strongly. Now I have to disagree with me. I gave blacks too much credit. It took a mere three days for blacks to turn the Superdome and the convention center into ghettos, rampant with theft, rape and murder.
I honestly didn't expect there to be so much backlash, among black and white people about it. QT is far from a racist.
jesus, if you want to get offended by a truly tasteless film about slavery, go watch Goodbye Uncle Tom. Definitely the most "realistic" film about slavery, created by actual racists
Overall I thought it was a very good movie that perhaps missed out on greatness due to the beginning, and also the first shootout at the house. There's some very odd editing going on there, but overall my biggest problem was that the shootout overshadows the final scene. I feel like it would have been better if Shultz died and Django was immediately beaten up and arrested; then you could have Django escape from the mining shit, save his girl, and then return to the house and kill everyone/kill Stephen/blow up the house.Apparently it was like this in the original script. Not sure why they changed it.
the ultraviolence felt way out of place and just dumb. amaizng movie otherwise. And there was some weird edit in the very beggining of the movie where I was like "wait is there a scene missing there?" .How is that a bad thing?
The scene where Django rides into town on horseback reminded me of blazing saddles too much though.
yeah that pissed me off so much in the film. every other character in a qt movie cant shut the fuck up, then here comes what could potentially be on of the most interesting characters hes done yet all django can say is "WHATS THAT WORD MEAN PLEASE EXPLAIN." i dunno if tarantino made this intentional or not but it totally felt like django never showed his full personality til his partner got killed.
I continue to believe Idris Elba would have been a better casting for Django than Foxx.His height/size would make things awkward. He looks like a mandingo fighter.
I continue to believe Idris Elba would have been a better casting for Django than Foxx.His height/size would make things awkward. He looks like a mandingo fighter.
I'd rather see badass gays during the 70s.
So after reading Tarantino's interview on the root, I've been thinking a lot about his "trilogy about the oppressed taking down the oppressors" and I think that the next logical step is Native Americans.
It goes further back, like how Inglourious Basterds is Jews during WW2 times which led into Django Unchained with Blacks during Slavery times. It's probably an even touchier subject than either, also there's a lot more misinformation about that than slavery even. Badass Jews in Germany during WW2 times to Badass Black Dude in the South during Slavery times to Badass Native American(s?) in America during the Revolution? Makes sense to me.
Please make this movie.I'd rather see badass gays during the 70s.
Ah yes, the Tom of Finland era.
ending was great; what i had a problem with is that 80% of the movie beforehand was german dude leading around django, coming up with all the plans, explaining words to django over and over ( ::) ). jamie foxx barely had any lines for most of the movie, and christopher waltz was positioned as the central character in most of the scenes. django's character arc was way too muted too. he'd talk back and insult the white people, but we never got to hear him rebut all their bullshit, never even got to hear him detail his thoughts or tell a story or SOMETHING while he was with waltz or his wife or someone. we got to see multiple sides of a lot of characters, but django just felt like a cardboard cutout when he shoulda been a lot more.In the films foetal stage it was called 'Angry in a woodpile''.
basically i was hoping for something like kill bill's bride's asskicking mixed with some righteous anger and what i got was a typical hero story against a backdrop of white slaveowners.
also kerry washington's role was so wasted :'(
I continue to believe Idris Elba would have been a better casting for Django than Foxx.to be fair, Idris Elba would be better at most roles then most other actors, including Superman, Willie Loman, Ghenghis Khan, and Captain Kirk.
I’ve seen ‘Django Unchained’ 12 times. Never in the history of Hollywood, have they ever made anything that freed the inside of me. The inside of me. I’m 80-years-old, I saw cowboy movies, wasn’t no Black folks in cowboy movies. I’m looking at a Western, plus a love story. To those of you all that see it, you’ll never see a love story about a Black man and a Black woman where it wasn’t some foul sex and foul language, huh. And Spike Lee can’t appreciate that. The little thug ain’t even seen the movie; he’s acting like he White.
So it must be something personal. And all them Black entertainers that know Spike Lee, how you gone attack this man and don’t be attacking them … and then say everyone’s a fool but me. [Talking about] ‘it offended my ancestors,’ but when you did ‘She’s Got To Have It’ and some of those other thug movies you did…you took Malcolm X and put a Zoot suit on him…did that offend your ancestors, punk?
It’s a game, man. So whatever he’s mad about is something that happened way, way long ago. Thank God it didn’t work [to stop the movie from being successful].
I went with a white friend, and afterwards we talked about the film and I kind of got an impression why some white (and black, to be fair) people were offended by the film: it seems like a shit ton of people are not aware of the house slave and field slave dynamic, and seemed to think this was some wacky offensive Tarantino creation. I looked back at some friend comments on Facebook and found similar befuddlement, and even some anger. At one point Django says a black slaver is lower than a head house negro, and that lays the groundwork for his disdain for Stephen; I took that as a logical view that a field slave would have at the time, whereas some of my black friends were like "Django hates black people, just so film goers can say he's no different than the slave owners herp derp."
And then on the flip side when Shultz ponders whether Broomhilda is inside or outside the house, Django seems offended by the assertion and basically says "she's pretty, of course she'll be in the house." I found that to be an interesting undercurrent to the film, one that is both historical and honest. I suppose I shouldn't be surprised that many white people aren't familiar with the concept considering how absent slavery is in most public school history curriculum, and those that are familiar seem to only recognize it on partisan political grounds that serve their agenda (for instance, the idea that black republicans=Uncle Toms; or that black democrats=content slaves).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znQe9nUKzvQ
:o i take back my criticismspoiler (click to show/hide)but seriously old dude:
(http://i.imgur.com/Bo85u.jpg)[close]
When I saw this in the theater, there was an audible gasp from the audience every time anyone said the N-word. Really, every single time, right up to the very end. I wonder if the trailers painted this out to be a different sort of film for those who aren't familiar with Tarantino. What furthers my suspicion is that someone brought their 7-year-old (and then stayed through the entire showing) . . .
When I saw this in the theater, there was an audible gasp from the audience every time anyone said the N-word. Really, every single time, right up to the very end. I wonder if the trailers painted this out to be a different sort of film for those who aren't familiar with Tarantino. What furthers my suspicion is that someone brought their 7-year-old (and then stayed through the entire showing) . . .
Who the fuck would bring a 7 year old to a Tarantino movie.
This is nothing to do with trailers but with people being stupid as fuck.
Ya I don't like to support black actors either.
I have made a promise to myself recently to never give money to any movie in theaters where the main plot revolves around a black character who is a slave, thug, ghetto, gangster, rapper, criminal, prostitute, crackhead, extremely overweight, has a speech impediment, mentally slow, or uneducated.
So I cant go see this movie.
I have made a promise to myself recently to never give money to any movie in theaters where the main plot revolves around a black character who is a slave, thug, ghetto, gangster, rapper, criminal, prostitute, crackhead, extremely overweight, has a speech impediment, mentally slow, or uneducated.
So I cant go see this movie.
But...Django has a black main character in a positive role...
But...Django has a black main character in a positive role...
But...Django has a black main character in a positive role...
He never really felt like the main character until the white dude died. Then they have to spend another 30 mins building him up as the real main character.
But...Django has a black main character in a positive role...
I dont believe his role was as positive as it seems. From the reviews i have read, He acts like a child after being freed, and only starts to kill after asking if he can by his sidekick who is really his puppetmaster. He only does this killing to get his wife back. Not to get revenge because he was enslaved or that his people as a whole was enslaved.
He is a ex-slave with no education who relies on a white man to mold/teach him but he doesnt use his new found knowledge to make life better for ones still in slavery, he just wants to save his wife...
It would be a revenge film if after he saved his wife he fought to end slavery by meeting up with Abraham Lincon or start a task force to end slavery.
Sorry if I might be wrong, but I'm going by the reviews I have read.
But...Django has a black main character in a positive role...
I dont believe his role was as positive as it seems. From the reviews i have read, He acts like a child after being freed, and only starts to kill after asking if he can by his sidekick who is really his puppetmaster. He only does this killing to get his wife back. Not to get revenge because he was enslaved or that his people as a whole was enslaved.
He is a ex-slave with no education who relies on a white man to mold/teach him but he doesnt use his new found knowledge to make life better for ones still in slavery, he just wants to save his wife...
It would be a revenge film if after he saved his wife he fought to end slavery by meeting up with Abraham Lincon or start a task force to end slavery.
Sorry if I might be wrong, but I'm going by the reviews I have read.
I dont believe his role was as positive as it seems. From the reviews i have read, He acts like a child after being freed, and only starts to kill after asking if he can by his sidekick who is really his puppetmaster. He only does this killing to get his wife back. Not to get revenge because he was enslaved or that his people as a whole was enslaved.This. All of this. Is fucking dumb. Especially the part in bold.
He is a ex-slave with no education who relies on a white man to mold/teach him but he doesnt use his new found knowledge to make life better for ones still in slavery, he just wants to save his wife...
It would be a revenge film if after he saved his wife he fought to end slavery by meeting up with Abraham Lincon or start a task force to end slavery.
But...Django has a black main character in a positive role...
I dont believe his role was as positive as it seems. From the reviews i have read, He acts like a child after being freed, and only starts to kill after asking if he can by his sidekick who is really his puppetmaster. He only does this killing to get his wife back. Not to get revenge because he was enslaved or that his people as a whole was enslaved.
He is a ex-slave with no education who relies on a white man to mold/teach him but he doesnt use his new found knowledge to make life better for ones still in slavery, he just wants to save his wife...
It would be a revenge film if after he saved his wife he fought to end slavery by meeting up with Abraham Lincon or start a task force to end slavery.
Sorry if I might be wrong, but I'm going by the reviews I have read.
wow, lan is a stupid asshole, who knew.
Leonardo Dicaprio taking 'a long, long break' from acting.
i would watch a movie staring lan, a strong black female protagonist who doesn't need a man and isn't afraid to speak her mind.
QuoteLeonardo Dicaprio taking 'a long, long break' from acting.
http://www.deadline.com/2013/01/leonardo-dicaprio-taking-a-long-long-break/
Django-related maybe?
I won't make the obvious joke here.
But...Django has a black main character in a positive role...
I dont believe his role was as positive as it seems. From the reviews i have read, He acts like a child after being freed, and only starts to kill after asking if he can by his sidekick who is really his puppetmaster. He only does this killing to get his wife back. Not to get revenge because he was enslaved or that his people as a whole was enslaved.
He is a ex-slave with no education who relies on a white man to mold/teach him but he doesnt use his new found knowledge to make life better for ones still in slavery, he just wants to save his wife...
It would be a revenge film if after he saved his wife he fought to end slavery by meeting up with Abraham Lincon or start a task force to end slavery.
Sorry if I might be wrong, but I'm going by the reviews I have read.
Do you view all films with such broad, macro expectations? Like say is Schindler's List a bad film because Schindler didn't free all the Jews? The plot of that film isn't about him saving every Jew, nor is Django Unchained about Django free every black slave. It's a typical revenge flick about someone trying to free his wife - and it happens to be set during slavery.
But...Django has a black main character in a positive role...
I dont believe his role was as positive as it seems. From the reviews i have read, He acts like a child after being freed, and only starts to kill after asking if he can by his sidekick who is really his puppetmaster. He only does this killing to get his wife back. Not to get revenge because he was enslaved or that his people as a whole was enslaved.
He is a ex-slave with no education who relies on a white man to mold/teach him but he doesnt use his new found knowledge to make life better for ones still in slavery, he just wants to save his wife...
It would be a revenge film if after he saved his wife he fought to end slavery by meeting up with Abraham Lincon or start a task force to end slavery.
Sorry if I might be wrong, but I'm going by the reviews I have read.
Do you view all films with such broad, macro expectations? Like say is Schindler's List a bad film because Schindler didn't free all the Jews? The plot of that film isn't about him saving every Jew, nor is Django Unchained about Django free every black slave. It's a typical revenge flick about someone trying to free his wife - and it happens to be set during slavery.
I have said in an eariler comment that I've decided recently to be more selective of the movies I spend my money on. I dont have any problem with anyone else enjoying this film. Why is there a problem with me deciding what I choose to expose myself to? Is it because everyone is watching it and most people accept this film? Im glad for that, but I can not enjoy these kinds of films anymore. People may Call me stupid, moronic, an asshole, or whatever they may please. But I wont chance my decision on the manner.
Summary: Ive watched movies like this before but I wont anymore.
Fistful: why do you think I see myself as a strong black woman who doesnt need a man?
because i wish i was as strong as you lan. tell me the secret of your strength
Ive been in a relationship, have you?
But...Django has a black main character in a positive role...
I dont believe his role was as positive as it seems. From the reviews i have read, He acts like a child after being freed, and only starts to kill after asking if he can by his sidekick who is really his puppetmaster. He only does this killing to get his wife back. Not to get revenge because he was enslaved or that his people as a whole was enslaved.
He is a ex-slave with no education who relies on a white man to mold/teach him but he doesnt use his new found knowledge to make life better for ones still in slavery, he just wants to save his wife...
It would be a revenge film if after he saved his wife he fought to end slavery by meeting up with Abraham Lincon or start a task force to end slavery.
Sorry if I might be wrong, but I'm going by the reviews I have read.
Do you view all films with such broad, macro expectations? Like say is Schindler's List a bad film because Schindler didn't free all the Jews? The plot of that film isn't about him saving every Jew, nor is Django Unchained about Django free every black slave. It's a typical revenge flick about someone trying to free his wife - and it happens to be set during slavery.
I have said in an eariler comment that I've decided recently to be more selective of the movies I spend my money on. I dont have any problem with anyone else enjoying this film. Why is there a problem with me deciding what I choose to expose myself to? Is it because everyone is watching it and most people accept this film? Im glad for that, but I can not enjoy these kinds of films anymore. People may Call me stupid, moronic, an asshole, or whatever they may please. But I wont chance my decision on the manner.
Summary: Ive watched movies like this before but I wont anymore.
Fistful: why do you think I see myself as a strong black woman who doesnt need a man?
I don't think it's a problem, just was curious on how you critique films. What are some of your favorite movies form the last few years?
Lan if you attack anything popular here people will jump down your throat just ignore them
do you want to go see a movie on our date? i hear there is a pretty good movie staring jamie foxx in theaters right now.
do you want to go see a movie on our date? i hear there is a pretty good movie staring jamie foxx in theaters right now.
Why are you mad that you have never had a girlfriend? Thats not my fault dude.
It would be a revenge film if after he saved his wife he fought to end slavery by meeting up with Abraham Lincon or start a task force to end slavery.
It would be a revenge film if after he saved his wife he fought to end slavery by meeting up with Abraham Lincon or start a task force to end slavery.
Django is a love story mixed in with revenge story and western. what the fuck do you want? Django even learns how to read.
real talk on a scale of 1-10, if malcom x were alive today how disappointed do you think he would be while reading through himus posting history
It would be a revenge film if after he saved his wife he fought to end slavery by meeting up with Abraham Lincon or start a task force to end slavery.
Django is a love story mixed in with revenge story and western. what the fuck do you want? Django even learns how to read.
Im just over slavery, racism films. I want to see black actors with less stereotypes connected to their roles. I'm fine with waiting.
It would be a revenge film if after he saved his wife he fought to end slavery by meeting up with Abraham Lincon or start a task force to end slavery.
Django is a love story mixed in with revenge story and western. what the fuck do you want? Django even learns how to read.
Im just over slavery, racism films. I want to see black actors with less stereotypes connected to their roles. I'm fine with waiting.
1. slavery films are not that common.
2. how is slavery a stereotype? it was a part of our history.
3. django is not a slavery film.
???
mmm, pulsing blackness :drool
real talk on a scale of 1-10, if malcom x were alive today how disappointed do you think he would be while reading through himus posting history
real talk on a scale of 1-10, who else is sick of positive touch thinking he has a pulse on blackness?
i enjoy the fact that QT can pretty much make whatever movie he wants to but i would like him to go back and do something smaller. changing film styles and genres every film has, itself, become predictable. of course my favorite movie oh his is Reservoir Dogs so I'm a bit impartial.
i enjoy the fact that QT can pretty much make whatever movie he wants to but i would like him to go back and do something smaller. changing film styles and genres every film has, itself, become predictable. of course my favorite movie oh his is Reservoir Dogs so I'm a bit impartial.
Fuck that. I want a sci-fi film.
real talk on a scale of 1-10, if malcom x were alive today how disappointed do you think he would be while reading through himus posting history
real talk on a scale of 1-10, who else is sick of positive touch thinking he has a pulse on blackness?
:heart never stop being so sensitive
Yes, slavery films are rare. I didnt see Amistad.
Um wtf about the above comment. Lol
White guys: If you want to date a black girl just ask her. Despite popular belief many black women will date men who are not black.
You Welcome..
if it makes you feel any better my favorite band is ween
Yes, slavery films are rare. I didnt see Amistad.
Um wtf about the above comment. Lol
White guys: If you want to date a black girl just ask her. Despite popular belief many black women will date men who are not black.
You Welcome..
If you acknowledge that slavery films are rare and we have said that Django is not a slavery film then ???
Anyways, I don't know what this is about black people playing in stereotypes. Aside from Tyler Perry films aren't we kinda past that?
if it makes you feel any better my favorite band is ween
my favorite band 2 :bow :bow
:heartbeat :heart :heartbeat :heart :heartbeatif it makes you feel any better my favorite band is ween
my favorite band 2 :bow :bow
:heartbeat :heart :heartbeat :heart :heartbeat
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4e-aPughYQQ
Django's wife had been taken away long before Candie had anything to do with her, and Django killed two of the Brittle brothers early in the film well before King was able to get to the scene. King didn't "give him permission," and for most of the movie they're actually working together as PARTNERS.Seeing as how you didn't watch the movie, the Brittle brothers are the ones who whipped, branded, and sold Django's wife.
Yes, slavery films are rare. I didnt see Amistad.
Um wtf about the above comment. Lol
White guys: If you want to date a black girl just ask her. Despite popular belief many black women will date men who are not black.
You Welcome..
If you acknowledge that slavery films are rare and we have said that Django is not a slavery film then ???
Anyways, I don't know what this is about black people playing in stereotypes. Aside from Tyler Perry films aren't we kinda past that?
The Help, Blind Side, and Precious are some films that come to mind.
Why hasnt anyone touched on how Django doesnt kill Candi?
Why hasnt anyone touched on how Django doesnt kill Candi?You don't know what you are talking about. It's one thing to have opinions about things you have actually seen to see the full context of things but you read a plot summary or some reviews and are making all these weird assumptions or going in with all these weird assumptions about how the movie should be. It's cool to not like something or not be interested in something. It's not that cool to speak as an expert on something you haven't even seen.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Django_(character)Oh yeah wanted to ask, apart from Tarantino is there any official link to Sukiyaki Western Django? Is this movie anywhere near as good? (30 mins in now)
Franco Nero is the guy Jamie Foxx spells his name too.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Django_(character)Oh yeah wanted to ask, apart from Tarantino is there any official link to Sukiyaki Western Django? Is this movie anywhere near as good? (30 mins in now)
Franco Nero is the guy Jamie Foxx spells his name too.
Jesus.
Then can it be a revenge film? Candie took his wife, but he doesnt kill him, someone else does. He also has to ask for permission to kill white people until the end of the movie. I dont see Django as a hero, what hero answers to his side kick for most of the movie? From what i read in reviews Django has less lines than his own side kick. :lol
Then can it be a revenge film? Candie took his wife, but he doesnt kill him, someone else does. He also has to ask for permission to kill white people until the end of the movie. I dont see Django as a hero, what hero answers to his side kick for most of the movie? From what i read in reviews Django has less lines than his own side kick. :lol
The point I'm trying to make is even if Schultz were the type to kill Candie and commit suicide out of some sense of honor or conscience (and up until that point in the movie there was no indication he was), he certainly wasn't the type to put a death sentence on his friend (and the wife they were so close to walking out of there with) along with him. A short bit where he maybe catches Candie giving the nod to his thugs and realizing they weren't going to be allowed off the property alive, so he might as well kill him, would have made a bit more sense.
Looks like Django Unchained is going to become Tarantino's most successful movie. It's currently at a little over $300 million worldwide and it's still pretty early in its overseas release, where it's been doing very well.
You have to remember that we've never seen Schultz kill anybody for the sake of morality or cathartic pleasure until he killed Candie. That was never a situation he had been in, d it was basically his first murder that wasn't premeditated. That was a mistake that only somebody who wasn't black could make, which is why he turned to Django and said that he was sorry.
I'm sure all of Candie'a field slaves imagined everyday how they would kill the slavers but they would never act on it. The fact that Schultz wasn't used to having that restraint is what made him kill Candie.