According to the Los Angeles Times—in an article about another hoax "hate crime" on a college campus—false reports of racist hate crimes on college campuses have averaged about one a year for 20 years.
Of course as a white male Ann would feel that way.
A week after this made the news it was pretty clear that there was no case here. Oddly it took a year for some people to finally realize this.
she needs it in the dumper.
I personally find Ann to be pretty freakin' funny. There's no way she buys what she's selling most of the time.
I personally find Ann to be pretty freakin' funny. There's no way she buys what she's selling most of the time.
I have actually given serious thought to that. If, and this is a big if, she doesnt and its all satire I would have to say she is a genius.
she needs it in the dumper.
http://ifuckedanncoulterintheasshard.blogspot.com/
...I went back to punishing her asshole, giving no thought whatsoever to compassionate conservatism as her chocolate socket gnawed on my pork pipe. She was babbling now, as out of a delirious reverie.
Fuck her. She only champions the white cause.
Where was she when dud got shot 50 fucking times in his car in NY?
Poor white people, they're such targets for hate crimes :(
Fuck her. She only champions the white cause.
Where was she when dud got shot 50 fucking times in his car in NY?
Poor white people, they're such targets for hate crimes :(
Yes, let's judge her on things she didn't say.
Fuck her. She only champions the white cause.
Where was she when dud got shot 50 fucking times in his car in NY?
Poor white people, they're such targets for hate crimes :(
Yes, let's judge her on things she didn't say.
That was a fucking distinguished mentally-challenged response dude.
Fuck her. She only champions the white cause.
Where was she when dud got shot 50 fucking times in his car in NY?
Poor white people, they're such targets for hate crimes :(
Yes, let's judge her on things she didn't say.
That was a fucking distinguished mentally-challenged response dude.
Fuck her. She only champions the white cause.
Where was she when dud got shot 50 fucking times in his car in NY?
Poor white people, they're such targets for hate crimes :(
Yes, let's judge her on things she didn't say.
That was a fucking distinguished mentally-challenged response dude.
OMG he didnt say that Osama BinLaden is evil. HES A FUCKING TERRORIST GET HIM!!!
Honestly PD, maybe there was a racial element to this, painting it as a Black woman v. White man thing, but I'd always considered it a sad showing of the apparently treasured "Women would never lie about rape" conditioned response that PCniks seem to love so much.
Actually, I'm fairly certain I did see some black/white takes on it, but I never paid much attention to them.
So what if Ann Cunter thinks this way? Lots of people share the same opinion. Her reputation isn't so hot right now; I expect more of the same approach from her in the future.
The Duke case IS ridiculous.
So what if Ann Cunter thinks this way? Lots of people share the same opinion. Her reputation isn't so hot right now; I expect more of the same approach from her in the future.
The Duke case IS ridiculous.
Cool, so you agree with her on this then?
So what if Ann Cunter thinks this way? Lots of people share the same opinion. Her reputation isn't so hot right now; I expect more of the same approach from her in the future.
The Duke case IS ridiculous.
Cool, so you agree with her on this then?
So what if Ann Cunter thinks this way? Lots of people share the same opinion. Her reputation isn't so hot right now; I expect more of the same approach from her in the future.
The Duke case IS ridiculous.
Cool, so you agree with her on this then?
He can't admit it lol
So what if Ann Cunter thinks this way? Lots of people share the same opinion. Her reputation isn't so hot right now; I expect more of the same approach from her in the future.
The Duke case IS ridiculous.
Cool, so you agree with her on this then?
He can't admit it lol
Come, on Diablos, why is it always about partisanism? Just say "Ann Coulter is right on this one." It's not that hard!
So what if Ann Cunter thinks this way? Lots of people share the same opinion. Her reputation isn't so hot right now; I expect more of the same approach from her in the future.
The Duke case IS ridiculous.
Cool, so you agree with her on this then?
He can't admit it lol
Come, on Diablos, why is it always about partisanism? Just say "Ann Coulter is right on this one." It's not that hard!
I disagree. I find her ranting hilarious, and I think part of the joy comes from knowing how much it outrages so many people.
Why can't the people on the extremes can't ever admit that their political enemies might have a good idea or two?
Ann Coulter IS "on the extreme", the extreme right that is. Why would you expect her "political enemies" to agree with her?
Ann Coulter IS "on the extreme", the extreme right that is. Why would you expect her "political enemies" to agree with her?
Because what she's saying makes sense in this rarest of cases? Cmon, I thought you Democrats were going to start trying to be all bipartisan and shit?
Ann Coulter IS "on the extreme", the extreme right that is. Why would you expect her "political enemies" to agree with her?
Because what she's saying makes sense in this rarest of cases? Cmon, I thought you Democrats were going to start trying to be all bipartisan and shit?
So because she says one thing about a rape case that makes sense, people should be expected to give Ann Coulter a free pass? Is that what you're saying? Come on White Man, don't be daft. With the exception of this, I can't ever recall ever hearing her say something that I remotely agreed with. Also, pleasing people like Ann Coulter is not how you start trying to be bipartisan. That's a waste of fucking time. What do you want, a headline in USA Today that reads "DEMOCRATS TO COULTER: "WE'RE SORRY"? :lol
Also, you say "you" Democrats like I'm a Congressman or Senator, :lol
And here come the laughy faces! Once again, I am not saying Ann Coulter is your new Jesus, she was right on one thing!And that's basically what I said, too. So why'd you ask if Democrats are supposed to be bipartisan in this case? Who gives a shit; it's ANN COULTER.
Unlike you, though, I never completely write anyone off because of who they are
No, I said it because your attitude is fairly typical to that of hardline democrats. Lol it up, Diablos, you're as closed minded as THEY are.
I find it funny that you think things should be bipartisan, but only on your own freakin terms. Kinda defeats the point, doesn't it?
Coulter has described herself as a "polemicist" who likes to "stir up the pot" and makes no pretense at being "impartial or balanced".
Do people in the "reality-based community" really ignore reality when it comes from someone they've programmed themselves to hate?
This coming from someone who enjoys what Ann Coulter has to say. That's all I really need to know to take what you've said with a grain of salt.
I find it funny that you think things should be bipartisan, but only on your own freakin terms. Kinda defeats the point, doesn't it?i.fucking.love.you
I find it funny that you think things should be bipartisan, but only on your own freakin terms. Kinda defeats the point, doesn't it?i.fucking.love.you
Do people in the "reality-based community" really ignore reality when it comes from someone they've programmed themselves to hate?
Immediately writing people off and ignoring their pov is par for the course for these extremists. Instead of trying to understand why someone believes the things they do, they find it easier to plant their own flag and say that their own opinions are absolutely correct.
Ann Coulter IS "on the extreme", the extreme right that is. Why would you expect her "political enemies" to agree with her?
Ann Coulter's entire past is nothing but hating on liberals, White Man. It's kind of hard to not judge her past.
Ann Coulter's entire past is nothing but hating on liberals, White Man. It's kind of hard to not judge her past.
Well, I guess she won't be getting invited to your birthday party at McDonald's Playland this year.
I think he's calling you childish. Her past should have no interference with her being right on a subject. He's not asking you to agree with all her other views, only admit that she is correct in this instance without bringing up shit that has nothing to do with it.Ann Coulter's entire past is nothing but hating on liberals, White Man. It's kind of hard to not judge her past.
Well, I guess she won't be getting invited to your birthday party at McDonald's Playland this year.
What?
Ann Coulter's entire past is nothing but hating on liberals, White Man. It's kind of hard to not judge her past.
Well, I guess she won't be getting invited to your birthday party at McDonald's Playland this year.
What?
I think he's calling you childish. Her past should have no interference with her being right on a subject. He's not asking you to agree with all her other views, only admit that she is correct in this instance without bringing up shit that has nothing to do with it.
If you have experience with people who constantly misrepresent facts, construct bad arguments, and are generally demented it is then a good idea to primae facie write them off. The number of possible sources of information or opinion is so very vast that it is a good idea to lower that number when there is good cause to do so. For example if a conspiracy theorists constantly misrepresents facts then one need not pay attention to his new book that supposedly proves that George W. Bush is a robot controlled by "the Jews" or anything else he ever writes. Though, if he happens to be right about something, and this is brought to your attention, you can admit he's write while still writing him off in general.
You're using Art Bell as a source of entertainment and not as a source of information. Though I would listen attentively if he is discussing how to get some Lemurs from the old countryIf you have experience with people who constantly misrepresent facts, construct bad arguments, and are generally demented it is then a good idea to primae facie write them off. The number of possible sources of information or opinion is so very vast that it is a good idea to lower that number when there is good cause to do so. For example if a conspiracy theorists constantly misrepresents facts then one need not pay attention to his new book that supposedly proves that George W. Bush is a robot controlled by "the Jews" or anything else he ever writes. Though, if he happens to be right about something, and this is brought to your attention, you can admit he's write while still writing him off in general.
Pish. This is why you hippies failed. And coincidentally why I have over 20 gigs of Art Bell shows, too.
You're using Art Bell as a source of entertainment and not as a source of information. Though I would listen attentively if he is discussing how to get some Lemurs from the old country
What about Art Bell's Area 51 call? Wasn't that all set up?
Honestly PD, maybe there was a racial element to this, painting it as a Black woman v. White man thing, but I'd always considered it a sad showing of the apparently treasured "Women would never lie about rape" conditioned response that PCniks seem to love so much.
Actually, I'm fairly certain I did see some black/white takes on it, but I never paid much attention to them.
Honestly PD, maybe there was a racial element to this, painting it as a Black woman v. White man thing, but I'd always considered it a sad showing of the apparently treasured "Women would never lie about rape" conditioned response that PCniks seem to love so much.
Actually, I'm fairly certain I did see some black/white takes on it, but I never paid much attention to them.
I stumbled on to the ad placed by the Duke faculty and if this isn't the biggest case of race baiting I don't know what is.
http://listening.nfshost.com/listening.htm (http://listening.nfshost.com/listening.htm)
80% of the African & African-American Studies, 72% of the Women's Studies, and 60% of the Cultural Anthropology departments signed it.
0% of the Engineering, law, Biological Anthropology and Anatomy, Biology, Chemistry, Computer Science, Economics, Genetics, Germanic Languages/Literature, Psychology and Neuroscience, Religion, and Slavic and Eurasian Studies departments signed it.
Big shock there.
Honestly PD, maybe there was a racial element to this, painting it as a Black woman v. White man thing, but I'd always considered it a sad showing of the apparently treasured "Women would never lie about rape" conditioned response that PCniks seem to love so much.
Actually, I'm fairly certain I did see some black/white takes on it, but I never paid much attention to them.
I stumbled on to the ad placed by the Duke faculty and if this isn't the biggest case of race baiting I don't know what is.
http://listening.nfshost.com/listening.htm (http://listening.nfshost.com/listening.htm)
80% of the African & African-American Studies, 72% of the Women's Studies, and 60% of the Cultural Anthropology departments signed it.
0% of the Engineering, law, Biological Anthropology and Anatomy, Biology, Chemistry, Computer Science, Economics, Genetics, Germanic Languages/Literature, Psychology and Neuroscience, Religion, and Slavic and Eurasian Studies departments signed it.
Big shock there.
Yeah, she's pretty on target on this one. That case was completely ridiculous. It's ludicrous that Americans are conditioned like dogs to 100% believe the woman in these situations, despite any evidence to the contrary. And it's not like there WASN'T a lot of evidence proving the innocence of the lacrosse players.
Shame on the faculty for using what was clearly a hoax to even further push their lame agenda furthering these conditioned responses to perceived racism and sexism. Lameass PC bullshit.
Speaking of PC conditioning:QuoteAccording to the Los Angeles Times—in an article about another hoax "hate crime" on a college campus—false reports of racist hate crimes on college campuses have averaged about one a year for 20 years.
Without having read this LA Times article, I bet a lot of the hoax "hate crimes" weren't deliberate hoaxes, but just cases where an overly PC aware and "persecuted" jackass saw hate in something completely innocuous or unintended.
Yeah, she's pretty on target on this one. That case was completely ridiculous. It's ludicrous that Americans are conditioned like dogs to 100% believe the woman in these situations, despite any evidence to the contrary. And it's not like there WASN'T a lot of evidence proving the innocence of the lacrosse players.
Shame on the faculty for using what was clearly a hoax to even further push their lame agenda furthering these conditioned responses to perceived racism and sexism. Lameass PC bullshit.
Speaking of PC conditioning:QuoteAccording to the Los Angeles Times—in an article about another hoax "hate crime" on a college campus—false reports of racist hate crimes on college campuses have averaged about one a year for 20 years.
Without having read this LA Times article, I bet a lot of the hoax "hate crimes" weren't deliberate hoaxes, but just cases where an overly PC aware and "persecuted" jackass saw hate in something completely innocuous or unintended.
the lacrosse players, being white duke students, most likely are racist and could, conceivably, commit the acts they're charged with.
you still have no evidence it's a hoax.
she could very well be telling the truth, but she's black, living in the south, accusing wealthy whiteboys of rape.
from the outset, the odds were against her.
futami, this has nothing to do (or should have nothing to do) with "wealthy whiteboys." The whole thing has been overblown. That's what it boils down to. If you're dumb enough to make this about race, that's your problem. The case is, to put it simply, stupid.
futami, this has nothing to do (or should have nothing to do) with "wealthy whiteboys." The whole thing has been overblown. That's what it boils down to. If you're dumb enough to make this about race, that's your problem. The case is, to put it simply, stupid.
had it been three black boys, they'd probably would have been lynched by now.
it has everything to do with race.
Come on futami! She initially told police that she was raped by 20 white men, later claiming three (a few weeks ago she claimed she wasn't sure she was raped at all). The alleged victim originally claimed the white devils did not use condoms and ejaculated yet no DNA from any of the players was found on her. She also claimed she did not have sex for a whole week, but sperm from several males was found in her body. She also changed the timeline several times, nevertheless all of the timelines seem to be problematic for a variety of reasons (photo evidence, phone calls, taxi rides, ATM attraction, etc.). Let's not even get into her history.
futami, this has nothing to do (or should have nothing to do) with "wealthy whiteboys." The whole thing has been overblown. That's what it boils down to. If you're dumb enough to make this about race, that's your problem. The case is, to put it simply, stupid.had it been three black boys, they probably would have been lynched by now.
Well, I think it's just distinguished mentally-challenged to try to say race was a factor in this case. And the Kobe case for that matter.
Both were sexual assault cases, and I think the pavlovian "Women never lie about rape" thing outweighs the race factor. No matter what color their skin, people pay attention to rape charges.
I dunno, PD, it's difficult to tell how hard the race card was being played when the equally big Celebrity card was also on the table.