Might need to define the new Axis first
Us would never take europe
Us would never take europe
LOL it would take about a week.
We will be welcomed as liberators. :doge15? Last I checked World War II ended in 1945...spoiler (click to show/hide)Still have forces in Europe 15 years from now.[close]
I thought it was all those armed American patriots that would stop this evil?Nah. They'd be for it as long as its in the name of curb stomping brown people with motherfucking cruise missiles.
I thought it was all those armed American patriots that would stop this evil?Nah. They'd be for it as long as its in the name of curb stomping brown people with motherfucking cruise missiles.
If you only look at the European Union our armed forces are same size as US. Many of our tech is also better (German armor) or equal (airforce).
So I dunno how you think you'd just waltz in lol.
Not even adding European countries that arent in the EU like Russia :)
Here's a stupid vice article, just so we can all go full distinguished mentally-challenged fellow about this together
http://www.vice.com/en_uk/read/we-asked-a-military-expert-if-the-whole-world-could-conquer-the-united-states
Well that is silly. If nukes aren't an issue, America can't stop the rest of the world building the logistics necessary for an invasion given a year or two to do it.
Think that there is a kill code brehs
We've already been invaded by Mexicans and Muslims.
:gddr5
Well that is silly. If nukes aren't an issue, America can't stop the rest of the world building the logistics necessary for an invasion given a year or two to do it.
LOL because surely we'd just watch and wait.
There would be a factory we didn't hit with a missile from a sub 300 miles away.
Honestly first thing they'd have to do in hit our satellites then pollute our great Lakes.
Well that is silly. If nukes aren't an issue, America can't stop the rest of the world building the logistics necessary for an invasion given a year or two to do it.
LOL because surely we'd just watch and wait.
There would be a factory we didn't hit with a missile from a sub 300 miles away.
Honestly first thing they'd have to do in hit our satellites then pollute our great Lakes.
LOL you guys wouldn't be able to project that kind of power while still maintaining a defense.
Don't forget, we have drew
TBH you guys would loss because once you loss a few thousand soldiers, your civilians will grow tired of war.
If you only look at the European Union our armed forces are same size as US. Many of our tech is also better (German armor) or equal (airforce).
So I dunno how you think you'd just waltz in lol.
Not even adding European countries that arent in the EU like Russia :)
LOL your tech is better? Get the fuck out. We'd own the sea and the air and your armor would be droned silly.
I mean I get national pride and all but we are the greatest nation in the world for a reason.
Oh and your airforce? What we don't kill code to start wouldn't get off the ground.
Well that is silly. If nukes aren't an issue, America can't stop the rest of the world building the logistics necessary for an invasion given a year or two to do it.
Ya but $711B spent in the US gets you a lot less than that spent in China, Russia, or India.
Also you'd loss because you'd have to spend billions interning every brown person in fear they would root for their real home country. You would need to build a wall around all of California.
Ya but $711B spent in the US gets you a lot less than that spent in China, Russia, or India.
Not to mention I'm sure a portion of that spend goes to all these countries for manufacturing.
Fascist rhetoric just isn't as cool without Hugo Boss.
Well that is silly. If nukes aren't an issue, America can't stop the rest of the world building the logistics necessary for an invasion given a year or two to do it.
A year or two to match the U.S. Navy? When the rest of the world is on offense and thus has the bulk of the logistical challenge?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_aircraft_carriers_by_country (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_aircraft_carriers_by_country)
The rest of the world has as many active carriers as the U.S. Most of these are poverty-tier "carriers" with a fraction of the capability of a Nimitz class. Then you have to consider the naval aircraft necessary to make a carrier worth anything. Plus you need to build the dry dock for actual construction and consider that the U.S. will be lobbing missiles at these sites nonstop. Then assuming you get the shipyards in place, you aren't building a carrier in a year.
Best bet would be if the U.S. went on offense early and something like China's carrier killer missiles took out a few carrier groups. Conceivably the U.S. could be crippled for the rest of the war like Japan was after Midway.
If the U.S. is on defense, then we're the ones hitting the invading fleet with missiles and ground-based aircraft. Plus subs.
I honestly don't see the rest of the world getting a single beachhead on the continental U.S.
Now if you could magically transform the globe back into Pangea, the U.S. would be pretty fucked in this scenario with no oceans. The ocean buffer is probably our single greatest advantage in this scenario, beyond military spending.
Also you'd loss because you'd have to spend billions interning every brown person in fear they would root for their real home country. You would need to build a wall around all of California.
I'd prefer a wall built around Florida, thanks :)