THE BORE

General => The Superdeep Borehole => Topic started by: Phoenix Dark on April 27, 2016, 11:08:13 PM

Title: Why is Batman 89 better than Nolan Batman
Post by: Phoenix Dark on April 27, 2016, 11:08:13 PM
(https://45.media.tumblr.com/5e46129215f300c86406fe0c8fc09a4c/tumblr_nqnafb1m6o1qfr6udo1_500.gif)

I dedicate this to the GOAT goon, Bob. Everyone needs a guy on the squad who got your back no matter what.
(http://i.imgur.com/4J2Skza.jpg)

Bob>every non-Joker character in the Nolan films

No philosophy, no serious Batman voice. Just a man in a mask fighting a clown and his loyal goon Bob. And Vicky Vale>every chick in Nolan Batman
Title: Re: Why is Batman 89 better than Nolan Batman
Post by: Madrun Badrun on April 27, 2016, 11:13:46 PM
This is the kind of opinion that should first be tested with an alt account.  That way people don't remember you said this a decade later.
Title: Re: Why is Batman 89 better than Nolan Batman
Post by: toku on April 27, 2016, 11:19:36 PM
Like literally just everything. The city, keaton infront of the computer etc etc I don't see Vicky Vale in the poll though nicca
Title: Re: Why is Batman 89 better than Nolan Batman
Post by: Phoenix Dark on April 27, 2016, 11:27:55 PM
Poll reset, Vicky Vale added

:drudge

Title: Re: Why is Batman 89 better than Nolan Batman
Post by: Great Rumbler on April 27, 2016, 11:34:58 PM
Keaton was better in Beetlejuice.
Title: Re: Why is Batman 89 better than Nolan Batman
Post by: Rahxephon91 on April 28, 2016, 12:08:19 AM
It really isn't.

Well art direction sure.
Title: Re: Why is Batman 89 better than Nolan Batman
Post by: Human Snorenado on April 28, 2016, 12:14:26 AM
Soundtrack and score are the obvious answers here
Title: Re: Why is Batman 89 better than Nolan Batman
Post by: mormapope on April 28, 2016, 12:18:00 AM
It has a sense of fun and not taking itself too seriously. The characters in 89 Batman seem more like real people rather than random plot devices let loose in a city. Michael Keaton has a more upbeat and goofy presence compared to Bale's suave and cold presence, I enjoy the former a lot more than the latter. The cast itself and performances, even for minor characters, makes Gotham feel lived in, lively, dangerous. The cast in Nolan movies and their performances are all cold and sterile.

Nolan's Batman movies present themselves as being more grounded and real, if you tried to put the comics and the material in our world. While the Burton Batman movies are a mix of the comics and Burton crafting a world around those comics. 

Nolan made perfectly reasonable but boring Batman movies. Burton made goofy as fuck and fun Batman movies.
Title: Re: Why is Batman 89 better than Nolan Batman
Post by: bluemax on April 28, 2016, 12:43:41 AM
Because Burton at least tried to grasp the character of Batman, unlike that hack Nolan.
Title: Re: Why is Batman 89 better than Nolan Batman
Post by: Am_I_Anonymous on April 28, 2016, 06:36:02 AM
PD is right.

89 felt like a comic book movie. Now these assholes fancy themselves as producing dramas.....fuck that shit.
Title: Re: Why is Batman 89 better than Nolan Batman
Post by: pilonv1 on April 28, 2016, 08:02:33 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HUmce-zeaAA

Please add this to the poll
Title: Re: Why is Batman 89 better than Nolan Batman
Post by: Joe Molotov on April 28, 2016, 10:03:41 AM
Fixed the poll.
Title: Re: Why is Batman 89 better than Nolan Batman
Post by: nudemacusers on April 28, 2016, 11:35:14 AM
Only good thing about Nolan bat is the joker. Everything else is zzz 💩
Title: Re: Why is Batman 89 better than Nolan Batman
Post by: Yulwei on April 28, 2016, 12:19:35 PM
I prefer the various batman cartoons over any of this bullshit tbh.
Title: Re: Why is Batman 89 better than Nolan Batman
Post by: jakefromstatefarm on April 28, 2016, 12:20:47 PM
Only good thing about Nolan bat is the joker. Everything else is zzz 💩
nah fuck you, first ~30 minutes of begins is great
Title: Re: Why is Batman 89 better than Nolan Batman
Post by: Steve Contra on April 28, 2016, 12:53:47 PM
89 had Kim Basinger and Michael Keaton, Begins had Christian Bale and Katie Holmes.  This isn't really something we need to discuss.
Title: Re: Why is Batman 89 better than Nolan Batman
Post by: Madrun Badrun on April 28, 2016, 01:41:09 PM
Your sentence lacked gender symmetry.  Vile.   
Title: Re: Why is Batman 89 better than Nolan Batman
Post by: bork on April 28, 2016, 02:34:53 PM
I see an option for "Party man," but where is "Party MA-HAAAAAN~"?


 :confused

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Lx_x0rTh3c
Title: Re: Why is Batman 89 better than Nolan Batman
Post by: thisismyusername on April 28, 2016, 04:04:03 PM
You can put Youtubes in the poll options. :ohhh

What I don't get is why Nolan ever bothered with Batman. He's too damn serious to make comic shit work. It makes no sense. Burton at least actually likes dark fantasy worlds, like the Batman universe.

Nolan's films are cool to see the 'what if Batman was really real' Batman but other than that... meh

He was forced into it to make Inception, he had to do Batman.

WB wouldn't have bankrolled it otherwise. Just thank whatever deity you worship that Nolan Bat's isn't a part of the ass-tastic DC Cinematic Universe WB/DC are going for now.
Title: Re: Why is Batman 89 better than Nolan Batman
Post by: Phoenix Dark on April 28, 2016, 04:12:08 PM
Batman Begins is nearly completely forgettable. Even the beginning, which many people seem to love, isn't noteworthy to me.

The Dark Knight was dope but you quickly realize there are a lot of parts that just suck in hindsight. The boat stuff, Two Face v Gordon, etc...ugh. The Joker is amazing though.

TDKR has no redeeming qualities.
Title: Re: Why is Batman 89 better than Nolan Batman
Post by: Mupepe on April 28, 2016, 04:59:40 PM
Batman Begins is nearly completely forgettable. Even the beginning, which many people seem to love, isn't noteworthy to me.

The Dark Knight was dope but you quickly realize there are a lot of parts that just suck in hindsight. The boat stuff, Two Face v Gordon, etc...ugh. The Joker is amazing though.

TDKR has no redeeming qualities.
Bull.Fucking.Shit on the bolded.  Tom Hardy's incredible physique makes it A tier alone.
Title: Re: Why is Batman 89 better than Nolan Batman
Post by: Trent Dole on April 28, 2016, 06:30:48 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6lfjpuHBsqg

Please add this to the poll
GET THE FUNK UP :bow
Title: Re: Why is Batman 89 better than Nolan Batman
Post by: Olivia Wilde Homo on April 29, 2016, 12:40:10 AM
It's because of the changing demographics of comic book movie viewers.

In 1989, it was kids and pre-teens

In 2005-2012, it was manchildren in their 20s and 30s who confuse grimdark with depth
Title: Re: Why is Batman 89 better than Nolan Batman
Post by: Mr. Nobody on April 29, 2016, 12:55:52 AM
Only good thing about Nolan bat is the joker. Everything else is zzz 💩

As time goes on, I've come to terms with this.  :yeshrug
Title: Re: Why is Batman 89 better than Nolan Batman
Post by: Mandark on April 29, 2016, 12:57:34 AM
I like the idea of Batman 89 more than the movie itself.

It hasn't aged as badly as Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves but...
Title: Re: Why is Batman 89 better than Nolan Batman
Post by: benjipwns on April 29, 2016, 01:10:43 AM
wtf is this offensive bullshit

Billy Dee Williams was Harvey Dent, not the mayor.

And he took the role because he wanted to play Two Face.

Thankfully, they dumped him and Marlon Wayans (and WB paid them both off) to get white guys back in those roles for Batman Forever saving the film and franchise.

spoiler (click to show/hide)
Also, Batman Returns. :drool
[close]
Title: Re: Why is Batman 89 better than Nolan Batman
Post by: Mandark on April 29, 2016, 01:13:42 AM
Didn't know that.

It's funnier cause Tommy Lee Jones' Two-Face was so pointless.
Title: Re: Why is Batman 89 better than Nolan Batman
Post by: benjipwns on April 29, 2016, 01:19:50 AM
Keaton* and Kilmer do change their voice to be more gravely and such while Batman vs. when Bruce Wayne btw. It's not just the over-the-top growl that Bale grows into.

Bale's isn't that absurd insane in most of Begins either. (Best part is all the times in the three movies that Bale uses his Batman voice in private conversations with people who already know he's Bruce Wayne.)

Clooney doesn't, which I assume is a homage to Adam West.

*http://www.mtv.com/news/2047921/michael-keaton-batman-voice/
Quote
“I’m kind of a logic freak,” he said. “I don’t know how to do anything unless I have a logic to it. It can be the silliest, stupidest, broadest thing, but I have to work from somewhere.”

Keaton encountered a serious logic problem during his first scene shooting as the Caped Crusader, in which he confronts a criminal in a dark alley.

“There’s no way this guy doesn’t just look at me and say, ’That’s Bruce Wayne, everybody! I figured it out!'” he said with a laugh. “’It’s obviously you! You’re four feet away from me!'”

Burton and Keaton explored a few different ways to preserve Batman’s identity in the scene, from the way he was positioned, to the use of contact lenses. Ultimately, the only thing that made sense to Keaton is if Batman used a different voice than the famous Gotham City playboy.

“I had to do something,” he said. “I had to drop down a register. Then I learned, later, that it became a thing [for future ’Batman’ movies].”
Title: Re: Why is Batman 89 better than Nolan Batman
Post by: Joe Molotov on April 29, 2016, 01:23:44 AM
wtf is this offensive bullshit

Billy Dee Williams was Harvey Dent, not the mayor.

And he took the role because he wanted to play Two Face.

Thankfully, they dumped him and Marlon Wayans (and WB paid them both off) to get white guys back in those roles for Batman Forever saving the film and franchise.

spoiler (click to show/hide)
Also, Batman Returns. :drool
[close]

The best part of Batman Forever was still a black man, tho.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ateQQc-AgEM

:lawd
Title: Re: Why is Batman 89 better than Nolan Batman
Post by: Great Rumbler on April 29, 2016, 01:31:51 AM
Keaton* and Kilmer do change their voice to be more gravely and such while Batman vs. when Bruce Wayne btw. It's not just the over-the-top growl that Bale grows into.

Bale's isn't that absurd insane in most of Begins either. (Best part is all the times in the three movies that Bale uses his Batman voice in private conversations with people who already know he's Bruce Wayne.)

Clooney doesn't, which I assume is a homage to Adam West.

*http://www.mtv.com/news/2047921/michael-keaton-batman-voice/
Quote
“I’m kind of a logic freak,” he said. “I don’t know how to do anything unless I have a logic to it. It can be the silliest, stupidest, broadest thing, but I have to work from somewhere.”

Keaton encountered a serious logic problem during his first scene shooting as the Caped Crusader, in which he confronts a criminal in a dark alley.

“There’s no way this guy doesn’t just look at me and say, ’That’s Bruce Wayne, everybody! I figured it out!'” he said with a laugh. “’It’s obviously you! You’re four feet away from me!'”

Burton and Keaton explored a few different ways to preserve Batman’s identity in the scene, from the way he was positioned, to the use of contact lenses. Ultimately, the only thing that made sense to Keaton is if Batman used a different voice than the famous Gotham City playboy.

“I had to do something,” he said. “I had to drop down a register. Then I learned, later, that it became a thing [for future ’Batman’ movies].”

(http://i.imgur.com/sFuULWA.jpg)
Title: Re: Why is Batman 89 better than Nolan Batman
Post by: benjipwns on April 29, 2016, 01:32:16 AM
Batman and Robin had this though:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfpnIyqieyk

And REMIX:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdFcHc2yDQ0

spoiler (click to show/hide)
Also:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UNoouLa7uxA
[close]

Didn't know that.

It's funnier cause Tommy Lee Jones' Two-Face was so pointless.
There's a different cut of Forever that's "darker" where Two-Face is less of a goofball and starts off the movie having murdered a bunch of people to escape Arkham. Even Carrey's Riddler is slightly different and a bit less wacky as it shows more of his planning out things. WB or whoever didn't even let Schumaker put all the cut scenes on the various DVDs. IIRC, there's zero alternate takes or deleted scenes of Carrey and only a handful of Jones'. A bunch of Kilmer/Kidman/O'Donnell though.

Part of the whole plot was supposed to be Bruce coming to doubt his war and confronting his potentially being as messed up as the villains. There's like two seconds of it in the movie, and Kidman's role as a psychologist.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=78mXN6z7HJU

spoiler (click to show/hide)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ioQiparmEns

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sw28zIK9UxA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I3HwRnU4ryM
[close]
Title: Re: Why is Batman 89 better than Nolan Batman
Post by: benjipwns on April 29, 2016, 01:37:08 AM
The "Forever" titling is even supposed to relate to Bruce's realization about his role as Batman. It's just meaningless with most of that plot excised for more Carrey hijinks. :lol
Title: Re: Why is Batman 89 better than Nolan Batman
Post by: chronovore on April 29, 2016, 04:16:27 AM
I love Prince, but it was a big mistake that every radio in Gotham City /only/ played Prince at any given moment.

Vicki Vale was trash. There, I said it.
Title: Re: Why is Batman 89 better than Nolan Batman
Post by: SplittinWigs on April 29, 2016, 04:46:37 AM
All of the above.

It has a sense of fun and not taking itself too seriously.
This right here is my biggest problem with a lot modern superhero movies. Get that pretentious shit out my face, trying to make me take seriously a bunch of autists running around in spandex costumes doling out betamax vigilante justice and trite pseudo-badass one-liners (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OfFbxIHBdjo). Shoehorning corny grimdark fantasizing into comic book universes will never work for me, sorry. Deadpool and The Avengers are corny in their own rights but so much more self-aware and thus more platable than shit like Nolan Batman.
Title: Re: Why is Batman 89 better than Nolan Batman
Post by: Great Rumbler on April 29, 2016, 03:22:01 PM
Nolan Batman being dark is fine, but the whole "grimdark comics stories for adults!!" angle has been beaten so far into the ground at this point. And with Snyder still in the wheelhouse at WB, that's probably not going to change for quite a while.
Title: Re: Why is Batman 89 better than Nolan Batman
Post by: Trent Dole on April 29, 2016, 03:39:09 PM
Am I allowed to like both? :-[ TAS and Adam West Batman are wonderful as well.
Title: Re: Why is Batman 89 better than Nolan Batman
Post by: Steve Contra on April 29, 2016, 03:50:48 PM
Batman Begins is nearly completely forgettable. Even the beginning, which many people seem to love, isn't noteworthy to me.

The Dark Knight was dope but you quickly realize there are a lot of parts that just suck in hindsight. The boat stuff, Two Face v Gordon, etc...ugh. The Joker is amazing though.

TDKR has no redeeming qualities.
This is where I'm I'm at.  I don't like Nolan's batman's but Begins was at least coherent, and The Dark Knight had like 1 really good hour in it.  TDKR is actually a really bad movie.
Title: Re: Why is Batman 89 better than Nolan Batman
Post by: Great Rumbler on April 29, 2016, 03:53:13 PM
Am I allowed to like both? :-[ TAS and Adam West Batman are wonderful as well.

Don't really get why you can't like all of them, even if you still have favorites. Just like with the comics, each has a different focus and approach that makes them unique and interesting.

Adam West Batman: Goofy, zany 60's fun
Burton Batman: Cartoony Gothic world full of twisted people
Batman TAS: Gothic world with villains that had actual depth
Nolan Batman: Serious-minded drama in a dark vision of the world
Title: Re: Why is Batman 89 better than Nolan Batman
Post by: thisismyusername on April 29, 2016, 04:30:50 PM
Nolan Batman being dark is fine, but the whole "grimdark comics stories for adults!!" angle has been beaten so far into the ground at this point.

Eh? Only WB is doing that. Marvel is generally running with their comedy. WB/DC is attempting to grimdark all their properties and ONLY Batman (IMO) is the one that works for that because that's the whole Batman gimmick. Shadows and fear.
Title: Re: Why is Batman 89 better than Nolan Batman
Post by: Madrun Badrun on April 29, 2016, 04:44:00 PM
It works for xmen as well.
Title: Re: Why is Batman 89 better than Nolan Batman
Post by: Dickie Dee on April 29, 2016, 04:50:40 PM
Didn't know that.

It's funnier cause Tommy Lee Jones' Two-Face was so pointless.

Funniest thing is that when meeting Jim Carrey on set, Jones said to Carrey's face "I hate you. I really don't like you…I cannot sanction your buffoonery."...and then out jamboned Carrey to within an inch of his life.
Title: Re: Why is Batman 89 better than Nolan Batman
Post by: recursivelyenumerable on May 03, 2016, 07:39:55 PM
there are surprisingly few legit google results for "logic freak" (though they do include an Instagram account name). maybe that should be my next music project name.