why did i listen to this whole thing :snoop
spoiler (click to show/hide)
the comments are full of daring truth telling:
Rods' Retroplays/Old Stopmotions
10 months ago
And I thought #1 would be IGN's Sonic Unleashed review, where the reviewer flat out says Sonic should remain dead as a franchise and giving it a 4.5, despite the awesome story it had (much better than the crap Pontac and Graff are spitting now), the all-new gorgeous Hedgehog Engine, the improved Boost mechanics from Sonic Rush, the overall great soundtrack, and it all gets overshadowed because the reviewers never tried to understand how the werehog sections of the game work. And this might be one of their lowest points, alongside El Shaddai and God Hand's reviews. Fuck you to hell IGN.
Adam Malkovich
10 months ago
The worst review I have ever seen is the IGN Sonic Unleashed review for Xbox360 and PS3. I understand that Sonic Unleashed may not be every Sonic fan's favorite Sonic game, but the reviewer from IGN who reviewed the game should have been fired for the lousy work he did. He complained about the Werehog to the point where he completely overexaggerated what was even wrong with the game and completely missed everything that actually made Sonic Unleashed, at least in my opinion, one of the best Sonic games of all time. Even if you don't agree with it being one of the best Sonic games, or even a Sonic game worth spending much time mentioning, the IGN reviewer reviewed only near 30% of the game in just a few minutes, and was biased basically the entire time.
RED SEA GAMING
4 weeks ago
Wow number one that's like somebody saying I couldn't defeat the first boss of blood-borne this is coming from someone who has beaten the game and gotten the platinum trophy. I have a feeling that video games journalists don't even know how to play video games correctly or judge them correctly.
RED SEA GAMING
4 weeks ago (edited)
Honestly review journalists should be fired and get somebody who knows how to play video games on board. These reviewers know how to play blood-borne and they gave that game high score and that game isn't hard at all why are they giving these games lower scores. Honestly I think some journalists who review games are basing their review more on nostalgia and also these games are huge how do you expect a reviewer to remember the last game they play thousands of games a year even I forget how great the last game was because I have almost 170 games in my collection.