In the fictional world of Lilo & Stitch, an outlaw alien is shown to have successfully rehabilitated into a better person that rose beyond the expectations of their authoritarian overlords. This no doubt draws parallels to inmates in the United States of America's prison system, and the road to rehabilitation that remains a constant conversation within twenty-first century discussions on ethical concerns
Stitch is then classified as a biological weapon; deemed a threat threat to the Galactic Federation and the authoritarian government (Lilo & Stitch 00:00:50-00:03:45). This is likely in reference to the plight of minorities who are often seen as weapons that are attacking the populace of the United States of America (Gregory par. 7-8).
One of the tactics enforced by the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency involves the capture and deportation of individuals who are targeted by ICE’s operations [...] . Stitch of Lilo & Stitch similarly faces threats shared by those of the illegal aliens of the United States. Stitch must avoid expressing himself of his natural state so as to throw off the pursuit of the Galactic Federation (Lilo & Stitch 00:28:00-00:29:40)
Writing 40 pages about the papal bull In nomine domini in 5 days.
Medieval studies. :yuck
wrote a 25 pager or something about Mussolini's ideological transition around The March where I filled in the biographical/events details by just using his Wikipedia article then fudged the citations to the books listed at the end
A-
god bless america and everyone else in the class for apparently being worse :american
When are they going to invent deepfakes for writing papers and teachers won't be able to google it and see if you just stole it from somewhereAlready exists, kind of. Should be good enough for essays.
Mentioned this before but I once wrote a decent length essay about what a single Arabic word in a primary source document from al-Andalus meant and how I ultimately determined the meaning of it.
:brain
I'm not sure if it was because my essay sucked or because my teacher hated me ever since i called Huckleberry Finn "Scooby Doo with more racism".
:idont
I fondly remember get easy A grades in primary school by impressing my teachers with Yoshi fanfic 8)I wrote about penguins once. "They appear to be flying underwater" or somesuch was a highlight.
I wrote an essay in HS that was entitled something to the effect of "Highschool athletes, tomorrow's criminals today!"Did you base this on any research or just pull the whole thing out of your arse?
My English teacher wouldn't let me turn it in and actually made me write a different essay. 15 year old me was fucking right though!
Socially constructed predicates
A simple definition of social constructivism is that all knowledge is predicated on prior understandings. A straightforward analogy for the concept is describing rules for a specific game of sport. In this instance I’ll use rugby. Imagine explaining to someone how a game of rugby works. There are two teams, 80 minutes of game-time, points are scored in several ways, and so on. But what knowledge would someone need to comprehend this information? There’s 15 players in a team: what is a team? The field is 100 meters long: what is a metre? It’s a unit of distance: what is distance, and physical space? What is a number? And so on. There’s really no limit to the questions you can ask, the point I make is that everything has a predicate, and that some predicates are more intuitively understood than others.
The motion picture ‘Hard Target’ depicts a gruesome means of entertainment wherein wealthy individuals pay large sums of money to hunt other non-consenting human beings as sport. The film never explicitly tells the viewer that “these men are bad” or that we should find the premise reprehensible. Rather, the filmmakers rely on an assumption that the audience will.
Not an essay, but I used the Royale with cheese clip from Pulp Fiction during a university Marketing 101 presentation to illustrate product differentiation.
TEA scores TAKS compositions on a four-point scale, with one being the lowest score and four being the highest. We base the rubric on five criteria—focus and coherence, organization, development of ideas, voice, and conventions. We consider each of the criteria equally in the scoring of each composition. We use the same writing rubric will to evaluate TAKS compositions at all grades assessed: Grade 4 English, Grade 4 Spanish, Grade 7, Grade 10, and Grade 11 Exit Level. In all cases, the testing contractor trains scorers to consider the criteria listed in the rubric in a way that is grade-level appropriate.
I've just about finished my bachelors in Computer Science and I've done a bunch of Philosophy papers as electives.