I think it makes the impeachment taking effect more likely. What Trump did allowing that sort of drone assassination with no actual briefing on the proof they had it's like we're back in Iraq with the "weapons of mass destruction". Even republicans will demand to see proof this time around.
I think it makes the impeachment taking effect more likely. What Trump did allowing that sort of drone assassination with no actual briefing on the proof they had it's like we're back in Iraq with the "weapons of mass destruction". Even republicans will demand to see proof this time around.
:lol
Republicans are currently backing their man and the Senate majority leader days he will be impartial towards the WH.
I think it makes the impeachment taking effect more likely. What Trump did allowing that sort of drone assassination with no actual briefing on the proof they had it's like we're back in Iraq with the "weapons of mass destruction". Even republicans will demand to see proof this time around.
:lol
Republicans are currently backing their man and the Senate majority leader days he will be impartial towards the WH.
They're currently backing him. Let's see how he responds now that they called out his bluff and what do the republican senators do. Remember some of them want to be re-elected.
I won't lie, i'm deeply disappointed in the drone strike. I was all for the strongarm attitude to get favorable results, but this attack... with no proof delivered whatsoever... I just can't see any justification. Watch him spin this attack into something that "they were already planning to do"
I think it makes the impeachment taking effect more likely. What Trump did allowing that sort of drone assassination with no actual briefing on the proof they had it's like we're back in Iraq with the "weapons of mass destruction". Even republicans will demand to see proof this time around.
:lol
Republicans are currently backing their man and the Senate majority leader days he will be impartial towards the WH.
They're currently backing him. Let's see how he responds now that they called out his bluff and what do the republican senators do. Remember some of them want to be re-elected.
I won't lie, i'm deeply disappointed in the drone strike. I was all for the strongarm attitude to get favorable results, but this attack... with no proof delivered whatsoever... I just can't see any justification. Watch him spin this attack into something that "they were already planning to do"
:doge
I think it makes the impeachment taking effect more likely. What Trump did allowing that sort of drone assassination with no actual briefing on the proof they had it's like we're back in Iraq with the "weapons of mass destruction". Even republicans will demand to see proof this time around.
:lol
Republicans are currently backing their man and the Senate majority leader days he will be impartial towards the WH.
They're currently backing him. Let's see how he responds now that they called out his bluff and what do the republican senators do. Remember some of them want to be re-elected.
I won't lie, i'm deeply disappointed in the drone strike. I was all for the strongarm attitude to get favorable results, but this attack... with no proof delivered whatsoever... I just can't see any justification. Watch him spin this attack into something that "they were already planning to do"
:doge
Remember North Korea talks, how they went to the shitter, but ultimately happened? Hell, his banter worked. Remember the whole F-35 pricing thing (I mean, imagine openly asking boeing if they wanted the contract if they did cheaper aircrafts, only to have the stock of Lockheed plummet. It worked)? If it gives results, i'm fine with it... this one though...
OK, I see what you mean, strongarm implies violence. I always figured it was a metaphor. But yeah, you get me... I meant to be persuasive by playing from a position of strength.
manyquotes
I wonder how many Democrats will vote for this war.
I wonder how many Democrats will vote for this war.
thinking we vote for wars anymore :neogaf
I wonder how many Democrats will vote for this war.
Warren half defended it, showing her to be an establishment candidate through and through. Only Bernie and the woman not to be named are completely anti-war in this scenario.
It’s a shitty situation for Dems. If the media can spin up a successful rah rah rah support our troops BS storm like they normally can at the start of a war, Democrats are in a lousy election position if they stick to their principles. Ugh I hate America
That famously principled anti-war Democrat party, whose politicians have been increasingly anti war and intervention in their actions and rhetoric. Especially recently where they schedule about 20 minutes during every debate to talk about America's enemies and how happy they are Trump isn't openly belligerent with them (till now of course). I'm sure all these new congresspersons (https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/28/politics/badass-women-impeachment-democrats-oped/index.html) with interesting backgrounds will get us out of this unsightly war mess.
I wonder how many Democrats will vote for this war.
Warren half defended it, showing her to be an establishment candidate through and through. Only Bernie and the woman not to be named are completely anti-war in this scenario.
which is a bad thing because it makes trump look good to his base and centr*sts
https://twitter.com/_curlytrill/status/1214605633288323077
lol bernie called him a bad guyspoiler (click to show/hide)all explanations of why it's okay when senpai does it should be sent via PM to Glen[close]
So what was the imminent threat? I haven't really been keeping up on this.They were going to bomb the US base in Iraq was missiles.
I understand how nuclear missiles and I imagine the "tempo" of modern war forced the issue of concentrating into a single commander in chief but there's something to be said for parliamentary-based conduct of wars...I think it's worth mentioning that the only reason this "tempo" exists is because of the global deployment of armed forces, not some secular progression of technology.
Gaining global support was pretty crucial in past military actions in the Middle East. Trump has zero skills or wherewithal to pull that off. We are more influenced by global media today then we were 20 years ago.
I think it can even hurt with his base. There are a good number of them that are anti-interventionist or detest needless military spending. They’re not all war hawks or blind patriots.