THE BORE

General => The Superdeep Borehole => Topic started by: Cheebs on April 21, 2007, 08:30:00 PM

Title: FUCK IT! RANDOM SEQUELS FUN
Post by: Cheebs on April 21, 2007, 08:30:00 PM
to get this fight out of mixing in spidey and potter topics. Vote and fight about it!
Title: Re: Movie Fight: Potter 2 vs Spidey 2
Post by: CajoleJuice on April 21, 2007, 08:30:41 PM
Spidey 2 FTW
Title: Re: Movie Fight: Potter 2 vs Spidey 2
Post by: Van Cruncheon on April 21, 2007, 08:31:01 PM
for god's sake, add a rambo: first blood 2 option
Title: Re: Movie Fight: Potter 2 vs Spidey 2
Post by: The Fake Shemp on April 21, 2007, 08:31:26 PM
Spider-Man 2 wins in a landslide.  The first two Harry Potter films are truly awful.
Title: Re: Movie Fight: Potter 2 vs Spidey 2
Post by: The Fake Shemp on April 21, 2007, 08:31:51 PM
Oh, that's bogus - TVC added in an extra vote with his joke character.  I am tempted to ban the Doctor now!
Title: Re: Movie Fight: Potter 2 vs Spidey 2
Post by: bud on April 21, 2007, 08:32:00 PM
even spidey1>>hp1+2
Title: Re: Movie Fight: Potter 2 vs Spidey 2
Post by: CajoleJuice on April 21, 2007, 08:32:07 PM
for god's sake, add a rambo: first blood 2 option

or Predator 2
Title: Re: Movie Fight: Potter 2 vs Spidey 2
Post by: TVC15 on April 21, 2007, 08:32:21 PM
I've said it before and I'll say it again:  Fantastic Four was better than Spider-Man 2.  The movie is over two fucking hours long and there's very little action.
Title: Re: Movie Fight: Potter 2 vs Spidey 2
Post by: bud on April 21, 2007, 08:32:35 PM
for god's sake, add a rambo: first blood 2 option

or Predator 2

or die hard
Title: Re: Movie Fight: Potter 2 vs Spidey 2
Post by: Candyflip on April 21, 2007, 08:32:39 PM
Spider-Man 2 wins in a landslide.  The first two Harry Potter films are truly awful.
I don't see a "First 2 Harry Potter Movies" on there.

Spiderman 2 was fun to watch..once. There's only so many times I can see him recite some crappy poem to that troll of a woman.
Title: Re: Movie Fight: Potter 2 vs Spidey 2
Post by: Cheebs on April 21, 2007, 08:32:48 PM
for god's sake, add a rambo: first blood 2 option
Done
Title: Re: Movie Fight: Potter 2 vs Spidey 2
Post by: The Fake Shemp on April 21, 2007, 08:33:52 PM
I've said it before and I'll say it again:  Fantastic Four was better than Spider-Man 2.  The movie is over two fucking hours long and there's very little action.

You bitch and complain about the lack of humor in Spider-Man 2 and emo characters, but hold Fantastic Four over it?  Did you even see the Fantastic Four?  There was like 60+ minutes of them complaining and crying that they're different and they have powers!  It has fewer action set pieces than Spider-Man!
Title: Re: Movie Fight: Potter 2 vs Spidey 2
Post by: The Fake Shemp on April 21, 2007, 08:34:47 PM
Spider-Man 2 wins in a landslide.  The first two Harry Potter films are truly awful.
I don't see a "First 2 Harry Potter Movies" on there.

Spiderman 2 was fun to watch..once. There's only so many times I can see him recite some crappy poem to that troll of a woman.

Uh, Harry Potter and The Chamber of Secrets is in the poll.  I just said both as they both equally suck and are directed by the same hack.
Title: Re: Movie Fight: Potter 2 vs Spidey 2
Post by: TVC15 on April 21, 2007, 08:35:20 PM
I've said it before and I'll say it again:  Fantastic Four was better than Spider-Man 2.  The movie is over two fucking hours long and there's very little action.

You bitch and complain about the lack of humor in Spider-Man 2 and emo characters, but hold Fantastic Four over it?  Did you even see the Fantastic Four?  There was like 60+ minutes of them complaining and crying that they're different and they have powers!  It has fewer action set pieces than Spider-Man!

But I didn't get bored watching it.  It's also considerably shorter.  And Doctor Miletski is not my joke character; she is my personal assistant.
Title: Re: Movie Fight: Potter 2 vs Spidey 2
Post by: Candyflip on April 21, 2007, 08:36:22 PM
Spider-Man 2 wins in a landslide.  The first two Harry Potter films are truly awful.
I don't see a "First 2 Harry Potter Movies" on there.

Spiderman 2 was fun to watch..once. There's only so many times I can see him recite some crappy poem to that troll of a woman.

Uh, Harry Potter and The Chamber of Secrets is in the poll.  I just said both as they both equally suck and are directed by the same hack.
God damn I'm sorry. I need to lay off the crack. I could have sworn that said Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban. I'm sorry :rofl
Title: Re: Movie Fight: Potter 2 vs Spidey 2
Post by: The Fake Shemp on April 21, 2007, 08:36:34 PM
If you honestly think the Fantastic Four is superior to Spidey 2, in your heart, and is not some dumb troll against me - then that hurts your credibility more than the Raimi-hate pains me. :'(
Title: Re: FUCK IT! RANDOM SEQUELS FUN
Post by: Cheebs on April 21, 2007, 08:37:07 PM
I changed everything. Go for it.
Title: Re: Movie Fight: Potter 2 vs Spidey 2
Post by: brawndolicious on April 21, 2007, 08:38:02 PM
that rambo wasn't bad.

what happened to rambo motherfucker?
Title: Re: FUCK IT! RANDOM SEQUELS FUN
Post by: TVC15 on April 21, 2007, 08:39:01 PM
If you honestly think the Fantastic Four is superior to Spidey 2, in your heart, and is not some dumb troll against me - then that hurts your credibility more than the Raimi-hate pains me. :'(

I wouldn't ever watch it again, but yes, I liked FF better than SM2.  I liked FF better than Superman Returns.  

Actually, in all honesty, Spider-Man 2 is better than Superman Returns.  I forgot how bad that movie was.  I was just thinking about it.
Title: Re: FUCK IT! RANDOM SEQUELS FUN
Post by: The Fake Shemp on April 21, 2007, 08:39:50 PM
If you honestly mean that - PM me that FOR REAL.  And then never PM me ever again!
Title: Re: FUCK IT! RANDOM SEQUELS FUN
Post by: Van Cruncheon on April 21, 2007, 08:43:51 PM
i'd rather watch fantastic four again than either spider-man 2 or superman returns. hell, i'd watch league of extraordinary gentlemen over those two, as well.
Title: Re: FUCK IT! RANDOM SEQUELS FUN
Post by: bud on April 21, 2007, 08:45:09 PM
hell, i'd watch league of extraordinary gentlemen over those two, as well.

 ::)
Title: Re: FUCK IT! RANDOM SEQUELS FUN
Post by: Madrun Badrun on April 21, 2007, 08:46:22 PM
whats this T"he Brave Little Toaster Goes to Mars "  :o


Also prediter 2.  Danny Glover at his worst  :-*
Title: Re: FUCK IT! RANDOM SEQUELS FUN
Post by: The Fake Shemp on April 21, 2007, 08:46:31 PM
I'd let you watch Fantastic Four again, simply because that is punishment enough for liking it over Spidey 2.
Title: Re: FUCK IT! RANDOM SEQUELS FUN
Post by: bluemax on April 21, 2007, 08:49:59 PM
I'm almost afraid to ask, but is there really a Brave Little Toaster Goes to Mars?
Title: Re: FUCK IT! RANDOM SEQUELS FUN
Post by: TVC15 on April 21, 2007, 08:51:46 PM
Ugh, League of Extraordinary Gentlemen.  That's also in the Fantastic Four category of pretty bad but still entertaining.  I love the comics so I'd rather not think about it.  I want Alan Moore to stick his peenor in me.

Quote
I'm almost afraid to ask, but is there really a Brave Little Toaster Goes to Mars?


http://imdb.com/title/tt0147926/
Title: Re: FUCK IT! RANDOM SEQUELS FUN
Post by: Cheebs on April 21, 2007, 08:52:58 PM
I'm almost afraid to ask, but is there really a Brave Little Toaster Goes to Mars?
yes
Title: Re: FUCK IT! RANDOM SEQUELS FUN
Post by: Van Cruncheon on April 21, 2007, 08:53:09 PM
league's killer flaw is that it has zero of the original authorial spirit or intent of the comics, but taken unto itself it's dumb fun.
Title: Re: FUCK IT! RANDOM SEQUELS FUN
Post by: HyperZoneWasAwesome on April 21, 2007, 08:54:56 PM
oddly enough, Psycho 2 is the best film listed there.
it's no masterpiece, but it doesn't suck and only feels slightly unnecessary.  Considering the film it follows is, well, freaking Psycho, that's a pretty big acomplishment.
Title: Re: FUCK IT! RANDOM SEQUELS FUN
Post by: TVC15 on April 21, 2007, 08:55:45 PM
oddly enough, Psycho 2 is the best film listed there.
it's no masterpiece, but it doesn't suck and only feels slightly unnecessary.  Considering the film it follows is, well, freaking Psycho, that's a pretty big acomplishment.

Robocop 2 is the best movie listed there.  Robocop 2 is awesome.
Title: Re: FUCK IT! RANDOM SEQUELS FUN
Post by: HyperZoneWasAwesome on April 21, 2007, 09:06:47 PM
Robocop 2 is the best movie listed there.  Robocop 2 is awesome.
It is awesome, but its got some shite acting, writing, and plenty of crapitude.  Although it does have many awesome instances of Robocop kicking ass and awesome stop-motion effects, Psycho 2 is the better made film.
Title: Re: Movie Fight: Potter 2 vs Spidey 2
Post by: Phoenix Dark on April 21, 2007, 09:10:52 PM
I've said it before and I'll say it again:  Fantastic Four was better than Spider-Man 2.  The movie is over two fucking hours long and there's very little action.

omg why are you always complaining about long movies :-\ >:(

I refuse to watch Fantastic 4. And Catwoman. And Daredevil. And Electra. And Will Farrel movies
Title: Re: Movie Fight: Potter 2 vs Spidey 2
Post by: Cheebs on April 21, 2007, 10:01:13 PM
I've said it before and I'll say it again:  Fantastic Four was better than Spider-Man 2.  The movie is over two fucking hours long and there's very little action.

omg why are you always complaining about long movies :-\ >:(

I refuse to watch Fantastic 4. And Catwoman. And Daredevil. And Electra. And Will Farrel movies
The director's cut of daredevil is pretty decent.
Title: Re: Movie Fight: Potter 2 vs Spidey 2
Post by: Bloodwake on April 21, 2007, 10:07:05 PM
Spider-Man 2 wins in a landslide.  The first two Harry Potter films are truly awful.

I agree with this statement.

And the best film in the poll is undoubtedly Episode II.
Title: Re: FUCK IT! RANDOM SEQUELS FUN
Post by: TVC15 on April 21, 2007, 10:09:13 PM
I've said it before and I'll say it again:  Fantastic Four was better than Spider-Man 2.  The movie is over two fucking hours long and there's very little action.

omg why are you always complaining about long movies :-\ >:(

I refuse to watch Fantastic 4. And Catwoman. And Daredevil. And Electra. And Will Farrel movies

If a movie's going to go north of 2 hours, it had better have a damned fine reason.  It is also pretty much mathematically proven that if you are doing a fluffy dumb summer flick, 2+ hours means BAD MOVIE.

I like plenty of long movies.  It's not like I'm on some crusade against long movies, it's that a badly done long movie is a bigger waste of time and more likely to be downright boring.  Look at it this way, every day, after work, I have like 5 hours to do shit I want to do, if I'm lucky.  I understandably do not want to waste that time trying to watch the Two Boring Towers again because it is not an economic use of my time, and I know it will likely put me to sleep again.  Fuck, I still haven't watched the Godfather 2 in one sitting, and I love that movie.
Title: Re: Movie Fight: Potter 2 vs Spidey 2
Post by: Madrun Badrun on April 21, 2007, 10:09:33 PM
I've said it before and I'll say it again:  Fantastic Four was better than Spider-Man 2.  The movie is over two fucking hours long and there's very little action.

omg why are you always complaining about long movies :-\ >:(

I refuse to watch Fantastic 4. And Catwoman. And Daredevil. And Electra. And Will Farrel movies

Jenny  :heartbeat :heartbeat :heartbeat
Title: Re: FUCK IT! RANDOM SEQUELS FUN
Post by: xnikki118x on April 22, 2007, 12:08:01 AM
Star Wars Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back
Title: Re: FUCK IT! RANDOM SEQUELS FUN
Post by: Bloodwake on April 22, 2007, 12:17:21 AM
Fantastic Four wasn't that bad. Plus, throughout the bad parts, you just had to remind yourself that Jessica Alba was going to be on the screen soon.