THE BORE

General => The Superdeep Borehole => Topic started by: Himu on June 03, 2007, 05:14:41 PM

Title: Let's continue to patronize FoC's movie theories itt
Post by: Himu on June 03, 2007, 05:14:41 PM
To continue from the thread he CLOSED because he's a pussy:

Quote from: tvc
Tiny People = The old people from the beginning of the movie, who at the beginning of the movie welcome Betty to Hollywood and wish her good things.  When things in the movie make their turn, and the dark reveal is made, they appear as maniacal characters, symbolizing how much things have fallen apart.  This is really obvious, and if you didn't get it, you are pretty much distinguished mentally-challenged.

It's also obvious that they're figments of Diane's imagination. They don't exist. How is it possible for little people to crawl through a door? It's Diane at her peak of guilt and depression. These demonic representations of grandmother and father (?) drive her to kill herself. It's really that simple and I understood that the first time I watched it.
Title: Re: Let's continue to patronize FoC's movie theories itt
Post by: Phoenix Dark on June 03, 2007, 05:15:34 PM
Even I'm disgusted.
Title: Re: Let's continue to patronize FoC's movie theories itt
Post by: Himu on June 03, 2007, 05:16:03 PM
Even I'm disgusted.

In FoC?
Title: Re: Let's continue to patronize FoC's movie theories itt
Post by: TVC15 on June 03, 2007, 05:16:31 PM
ALso, FOC, Ebert never liked Lynch up until Mulholland Dr.  I think Ebert is good for discussing the negative aspects of Lynch's works, but he's never been very good at explicating their good elements.
Title: Re: Let's continue to patronize FoC's movie theories itt
Post by: FlameOfCallandor on June 03, 2007, 05:17:52 PM
Yup, I'm a complete loser because I didnt like Mullholland drive.  ::)

Next.
Title: Re: Let's continue to patronize FoC's movie theories itt
Post by: TVC15 on June 03, 2007, 05:18:59 PM
Well, no, you're a complete loser for other reasons, too, not just your dislike of Mulholland Dr.
Title: Re: Let's continue to patronize FoC's movie theories itt
Post by: FlameOfCallandor on June 03, 2007, 05:19:56 PM
How predictable.

*Yawn* are you done trolling yet?
Title: Re: Let's continue to patronize FoC's movie theories itt
Post by: Phoenix Dark on June 03, 2007, 05:20:40 PM
Blue Velvet: 9.5/10 omg
Title: Re: Let's continue to patronize FoC's movie theories itt
Post by: Himu on June 03, 2007, 05:21:00 PM
I don't mind that you don't get Mulholland Drive. I know some people who didn't fully understand the movie as well, but they don't go around acting like it killed their mothers and they have reasonable reasons why they didn't care for it, and are also willing to give it another chance.

You, however, dance around saying you "get" it, and can't even understand the most basic themes.
Title: Re: Let's continue to patronize FoC's movie theories itt
Post by: Himu on June 03, 2007, 05:21:24 PM
Blue Velvet: 9.5/10 omg

The movie is amazing, but it made me feel totally uncomfortable. What about you?  :-[
Title: Re: Let's continue to patronize FoC's movie theories itt
Post by: TVC15 on June 03, 2007, 05:21:35 PM
Did you watch Blue Velvet, PD?
Title: Re: Let's continue to patronize FoC's movie theories itt
Post by: Himu on June 03, 2007, 05:24:55 PM
HE PUT HIS DISEASES IN ME

I got    Wild at Heart last night, TVC. Still haven't watched it yet.
Title: Re: Let's continue to patronize FoC's movie theories itt
Post by: TVC15 on June 03, 2007, 05:28:14 PM
HE PUT HIS DISEASES IN ME

I got    Wild at Heart last night, TVC. Still haven't watched it yet.

Wild at Heart is a fun movie, too.  I don't think it's as good as Blue Velvet, but maybe you will like it more since it isn't as unsettling and misogynistic.
Title: Re: Let's continue to patronize FoC's movie theories itt
Post by: Cheebs on June 03, 2007, 05:43:03 PM
Remember Jurassic Park is his fav movie of all time..lol..etc...
Title: Re: Let's continue to patronize FoC's movie theories itt
Post by: TVC15 on June 03, 2007, 05:47:19 PM
Remember Jurassic Park is his fav movie of all time..lol..etc...

Don't forget ROTJ is his favorite star wars movie.

Turkish Star Wars is mine.
Title: Re: Let's continue to patronize FoC's movie theories itt
Post by: Human Snorenado on June 03, 2007, 05:59:42 PM
Yawn.

Oh, what's that?  It's everyone coming back around to mocking FoC's shit taste and intelligence after treating him like an actual person for the past month or so.

I'd like to point out that I'm the only one who has consistently hated the idiot.
Title: Re: Let's continue to patronize FoC's movie theories itt
Post by: TVC15 on June 03, 2007, 06:06:43 PM
I'd like to point out that I'm the only one who has consistently hated the idiot.

He wasn't bad for a while.  Reward him with fair treatment when he does well, treat him like a cock when he deserves it.  That's totally fair.
Title: Re: Let's continue to patronize FoC's movie theories itt
Post by: Cheebs on June 03, 2007, 06:14:22 PM
When we treat him bad he feeds into it and makes like 30 threads though...  :-\
Title: Re: Let's continue to patronize FoC's movie theories itt
Post by: Van Cruncheon on June 03, 2007, 07:52:30 PM
that's 'cuz he's grossly insecure. we'll help him get over it. we're nice like that.
Title: Re: Let's continue to patronize FoC's movie theories itt
Post by: FlameOfCallandor on June 03, 2007, 08:26:28 PM
Remember Jurassic Park is his fav movie of all time..lol..etc...

Never said that. It's definitely one of the best summer blockbuster movies. It's not even on my facebook list of favorite movies.
Title: Re: Let's continue to patronize FoC's movie theories itt
Post by: Phoenix Dark on June 03, 2007, 08:48:25 PM
Wild at Heart omg 9/10

Lynch is a genius. Even I'm not dumb enough to deny that
Title: Re: Let's continue to patronize FoC's movie theories itt
Post by: Scurvy Stan on June 03, 2007, 09:00:01 PM
ITT I mention that Mulholland Drive sucks.
Title: Re: Let's continue to patronize FoC's movie theories itt
Post by: warcock on June 03, 2007, 10:15:51 PM
Im going to go and join the distinguished mentally-challenged fellow bandwagon and say that i really do not enjoy david lynch's work except the moving "cooked turkey" at the opening of eraserhead. But wtf do i know, in my eyes black hawk down is pure and simple visual crack.
Title: Re: Let's continue to patronize FoC's movie theories itt
Post by: Himu on June 04, 2007, 12:37:56 AM
Is FoC actually Maddox?

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=david_lynch