THE BORE

General => The Superdeep Borehole => Topic started by: CajoleJuice on June 16, 2007, 12:53:18 PM

Title: Bourne > Bond
Post by: CajoleJuice on June 16, 2007, 12:53:18 PM
(http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb219/CajoleJuice/GAF/bourne-ultimatum-big1.jpg)

I NEED THIS MOVIE NOW
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Phoenix Dark on June 16, 2007, 12:54:30 PM
Personally I can't stand Bond or anything he represents.

Bourne :-*
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Cyanista on June 16, 2007, 12:55:53 PM
Cosign.  To use the parlance of our times.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: bud on June 16, 2007, 12:56:43 PM
you know what, i agree. bourne is infinitely more badass but one thing that bond has that bourne doesn't have is the honeys :(

you forgot one poster btw
(http://imageshock.eu/img/p2-6cv1.jpg)

:bow
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Ichirou on June 16, 2007, 12:57:25 PM
What does Bond represent, PD?  :-\
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: bud on June 16, 2007, 12:58:06 PM
What does Bond represent, PD?  :-\

he represent badass crackas

matt damon :bow

edit: i misread  :lol

however, bond is much more of a womanizer than bourne but then again, BOURNE DOESN'T HAVE TIME FOR HOS
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Ichirou on June 16, 2007, 01:03:09 PM
Casino Royale was pretty fucking awesome.  I liked it more than the two Bourne movies.  The second Bourne movie especially made me nauseous with the weird constant shakycam.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: bud on June 16, 2007, 01:04:02 PM
i had that with batman: begins.

i think the shakycam in the bourne movie works, like it does in most of greengrass' movies.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Ichirou on June 16, 2007, 01:05:09 PM
The shakycam during the final fight in Batman Begins was fucking AWFUL.  I hope they avoid that for the sequel.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: CajoleJuice on June 16, 2007, 01:07:24 PM
i had that with batman: begins.

i think the shakycam in the bourne movie works, like it does in most of greengrass' movies.

I'm going to have to admit that the shaky-cam fucked up the fight in the house in Supremacy. It didn't fuck up the incredible car chase though.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Cyanista on June 16, 2007, 01:13:20 PM
It did.  Fuck shakycam.  The action in the Bourne Identity was SO GOOD.  THAT housefight was insane.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Ichirou on June 16, 2007, 01:14:30 PM
I think shakycam is a sign that the director isn't confident he can direct an action scene that can be edited cleanly.  It's bad form.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Mupepe on June 16, 2007, 01:15:47 PM
i still need to see supremacy.  but from identity, i can agree with this thread.

CASINO ROYALE IS A SHITTIER/FUNNIER VERSION OF MAVERICK!  BOTH OF WHICH ARE INCREDIBLE FEATS!
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: CajoleJuice on June 16, 2007, 01:17:12 PM
It did.  Fuck shakycam.  The action in the Bourne Identity was SO GOOD.  THAT housefight was insane.

"Y'know, I always thought that Matt Damon was like a Streisand, but he's rocking the shit in this one!"
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Ichirou on June 16, 2007, 01:17:54 PM
Everyone knows Maverick was Mel Gibson and Jodie Foster's finest hour.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: bud on June 16, 2007, 01:19:01 PM
maverick was awesome. it's probably my favourite movie about poker
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Mupepe on June 16, 2007, 01:20:44 PM
Everyone knows Maverick was Mel Gibson and Jodie Foster's finest hour.
It is HILARIOUS.  I love the movie.  I just say shittier to piss people off. 

casino royale is terrible though.  really.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: CajoleJuice on June 16, 2007, 01:21:02 PM
maverick was awesome. it's probably my favourite movie about poker

(http://www.videoservicecorp.com/images/rounders.jpg)

No. Matt Damon wins again.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Ichirou on June 16, 2007, 01:22:01 PM
lol, the funny thing is, that's not Matt Damon's or Edward Norton's hands.  Kinda creepy when you think about it.

And Casino Royale rocked my socks off.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: bud on June 16, 2007, 01:23:05 PM
i loved that one too (damon quit lawschool :() because it also had norton in it (one of my favourite actors) but maverick is one of my childhood memories that aged pretty well. the first time i saw rounders was 3 year ago iirc.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Solo on June 16, 2007, 01:25:12 PM
My opinion > Your opinion
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: bud on June 16, 2007, 01:25:41 PM
fact > opinion
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Error Macro on June 16, 2007, 01:27:03 PM
The first four Bond movies and OHMSS make me question this decision, or at least that's the fondness of nostalgia talking.  If we are talking about most everything after those, and especially the more recent films, then hell yes Bourne is absolutely better.  Casino Royale was trash.  The Bond franchise is dead.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: The Fake Shemp on June 16, 2007, 01:29:46 PM
Error is no longer my friend.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Cyanista on June 16, 2007, 01:33:39 PM
He doesn't need you, Willco! 

PS you can love James Bond as much as you want, but the first Bourne movie was one of the smartest, best acted action movies I've ever seen.  I don't think that can be said of any Bond film.  :-\
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Cheebs on June 16, 2007, 01:34:29 PM
Casino Royale was trash.  The Bond franchise is dead.
Except Casino Royale is the best reviewed wide-release movie of 2006 and boxoffice wise and critic wise it is credited with reviving the franchise to be cool and beloved again.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Cyanista on June 16, 2007, 01:36:31 PM
Critics are distinguished mentally-challenged.  They gave Weezer's Pinkerton NO STARS and Let's Go To Prison scored like nothing on the rotten tomato. 

Many critically acclaimed movies are crap. :(
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: bud on June 16, 2007, 01:38:12 PM
critics also bashed potc2:dmc >:(

spoiler (click to show/hide)
i loved potc2. potc2>potc1
[close]
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Yeti on June 16, 2007, 01:40:48 PM
Let's Go to Prison was above average at best. But maybe I was spoiled by Arrested Development.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Ichirou on June 16, 2007, 01:41:41 PM
Fuck what critics think.  Think for yourself.  I loved Casino Royale and Spider-Man 3.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: The Fake Shemp on June 16, 2007, 01:45:19 PM
PS you can love James Bond as much as you want, but the first Bourne movie was one of the smartest, best acted action movies I've ever seen.  I don't think that can be said of any Bond film.  :-\

The Bourne Identity rocked, as did Supremacy, but Bourne is not better than Bond.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Solo on June 16, 2007, 01:45:28 PM
Casino Royale was trash.  The Bond franchise is dead.

Casino Royale's box office (most successful Bond movie), critical reception (best reviewed wide release last year), and fan reception (save for a small niche of you crazy interweb folks) say otherwise. The Bond franchise is on more solid footing now that it has been in 30 years. CR is the best Bond film ever (yes, I finally said it; just tops FRWL and OHMSS), and I personally enjoyed it more than either Bourne film (but I love both of those as well).
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: demi on June 16, 2007, 01:46:32 PM
Haven't seen any of the movies being thrown around this thread, MEH
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Error Macro on June 16, 2007, 01:55:02 PM
Error is no longer my friend.

But what of the things we've shared? What of all the sweet words that you spoke in private?

Casino Royale was trash.  The Bond franchise is dead.
Except Casino Royale is the best reviewed wide-release movie of 2006 and boxoffice wise and critic wise it is credited with reviving the franchise to be cool and beloved again.

Do I...give a shit?  As has been previously stated, critics should have no bearing on one's opinion.  They certainly don't on mine.

I refrain from the nauseating use of "IMO" in my posts, but I'll clarify things: the Bond franchise is dead TO ME.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: CajoleJuice on June 16, 2007, 01:56:42 PM
Casino Royale was trash.  The Bond franchise is dead.
Except Casino Royale is the best reviewed wide-release movie of 2006 and boxoffice wise and critic wise it is credited with reviving the franchise to be cool and beloved again.

The Departed was reviewed better. Metacritic is a better measuring bar than Rotten Tomatoes.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: bud on June 16, 2007, 01:57:41 PM
the departed was awesome.

i still need to watch the extras and appearently they're pretty good :hyper
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Solo on June 16, 2007, 01:58:49 PM

The Departed was reviewed better. Metacritic is a better measuring bar than Rotten Tomatoes.

But if TD was higher rated on RT? Would it be better then? Oh JUICE
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: CajoleJuice on June 16, 2007, 02:00:31 PM
Yes, it would be. I usually stick to Rotten Tomatoes since it's what EVERYONE uses, but its system is too simple. Metacritic takes the actual scores into consideration, not just "favorable" or "unfavorable"
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Solo on June 16, 2007, 02:01:17 PM
But how does that work? Not every critic gives scores. And then some use letters.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: CajoleJuice on June 16, 2007, 02:01:55 PM
But how does that work? Not every critic gives scores. And then some use letters.

They assign a number score to the letters. And I've never seen a critic that doesn't give a score... :-[
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Solo on June 16, 2007, 02:03:17 PM
Some do. In reality, its a better way to review. That way people actually read your thoughts as opposed to just reading the score and moving on.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: CajoleJuice on June 16, 2007, 02:04:08 PM
You give scores.  :P
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: CajoleJuice on June 16, 2007, 02:06:20 PM
And Children of Men also scores higher than Casino Royale on Metacritic. You should like that.  :-*
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Solo on June 16, 2007, 02:10:53 PM
You give scores.  :P

I do. My way is hardly what Id call the best way though. Just the easiest way.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: TakingBackSunday on June 16, 2007, 02:44:35 PM
I'd say you can go either way.  Bond's best iteration, From Russia with Love, is fucking leagues better than Identity.  However, on the whole, the Bourne series is much more enjoyable than watching the majority of the Bond films.  When a good Bond film comes out, it's really fucking good.

To deny Casino Royale's awesome though is pure shit.  It's the best Bond in over thirty years.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Madrun Badrun on June 16, 2007, 02:47:10 PM
bond win couse he get girls and doesn't go all emo when they die.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: CajoleJuice on June 16, 2007, 02:50:55 PM
bond win couse he get girls and doesn't go all emo when they die.

Did you NOT see Casino Royale?
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Madrun Badrun on June 16, 2007, 02:52:53 PM
bond win couse he get girls and doesn't go all emo when they die.

Did you NOT see Casino Royale?

I don't count that piece of shit.  and it was acceptable in eyes only. 
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: TakingBackSunday on June 16, 2007, 03:41:01 PM
bond win couse he get girls and doesn't go all emo when they die.

Did you NOT see Casino Royale?

I don't count that piece of shit.  and it was acceptable in eyes only. 

You have failed twice in one post.

Casino Royale was awesome, stop denying it.  AND, when Bond's wife at the end of OHMSS gets shot, Bond cries.  That's the single best moment in ANY Bond movie ever.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Yeti on June 16, 2007, 08:06:40 PM
I would like to see the Bourne movies become a franchise instead of a trilogy, then they can actually be compared.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Phoenix Dark on June 16, 2007, 08:12:09 PM
What does Bond represent, PD?  :-\

To me he represents this very archaic character who always gets the girl(s), doesn't sweat or bleed, etc. Granted that changed in Casino Royale, but I'm talking more about Connery - who is still the iconic one. I don't like any of the old Bond movies, and find them all to be repulsive. I hate the rampant sex and the extremely repetitive plot devices. While Bond is definitely badass, his villians are extremely stupid to comical porportions. I don't like the series, period.

Want to know how to kill Bond? Send an AIDS infested chick to his house. He may not die right away, but he won't be jumping out of planes anytime soon >:(
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Madrun Badrun on June 16, 2007, 09:15:37 PM
I hear thats how the first M died -- AIDS. 
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Bloodwake on June 16, 2007, 09:16:04 PM
Every time I think of Bourne I think of

(http://i43.photobucket.com/albums/e366/eclipse_56_75/team_america_56.jpg)

MATT DAMON

Every time I think of James Bond I think of

(http://www.geocities.com/best_worst007/dc.jpg)

James Bond fucking owning people because the actor they cast kicked ass and

(http://www.robmead.net/files/eva-green.jpg)

some of the hottest girls ever. Especially Eva Green.

Casino Royale kicked ass. If you found something to nitpick in that film, then I don't see how. You must be high or fucking distinguished mentally-challenged or too anal to see straight. More than likely the anal part.

Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: CajoleJuice on June 16, 2007, 10:35:09 PM
I probably walked out the most satisfied out of all my friends.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Mupepe on June 16, 2007, 10:35:52 PM
I probably walked out the most satisfied out of all my friends.
walked out of what?  CR?
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: CajoleJuice on June 16, 2007, 10:40:17 PM
Yea, first time I walked out thinking it was great, but my buddy didn't seem too impressed. Went to see it a second time with more friends and enjoyed it less and my friends weren't into all that into it either.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Mupepe on June 16, 2007, 10:41:57 PM
i watched it on a date with Fatal1t and we both agreed that it's shit.  it was sooooo boring.  balls, man.  balls
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: CajoleJuice on June 16, 2007, 10:42:54 PM
Dude, it's not shit. :lol

spoiler (click to show/hide)
But it's no Bourne Identity either.  :spin
[close]
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Mupepe on June 16, 2007, 10:43:22 PM
fine, it's balls.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Tauntaun on June 16, 2007, 10:47:18 PM
fine, it's balls.

i like ur balls, i hear they're big  :-*
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: brawndolicious on June 16, 2007, 11:00:28 PM
I don't know anybody (other than one batshit bond fan) that would watch these on opening day.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Bloodwake on June 17, 2007, 01:03:06 AM
This thread is full of failure.

Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Himu on June 17, 2007, 01:08:09 AM
You guys are feggits.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Fresh Prince on June 17, 2007, 01:09:38 AM
Bond is the epitome of class, which America then shitted on.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Bloodwake on June 17, 2007, 01:11:37 AM
You guys are feggits.

Pretty much. Not liking Casino Royale just fucking implies faggotry.

 ;)
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Phoenix Dark on June 17, 2007, 01:12:11 AM
Bond is the epitome of class, which America then shitted on.

Don't you have better things to do, like denying genocides?
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Himu on June 17, 2007, 01:13:05 AM
You guys are feggits.

Pretty much. Not liking Casino Royale just fucking implies faggotry.

 ;)

I just don't get it. I love the poker scenes. I thought they were balanced enough to make the film entertaining. I mean, lots of shit happened during and between them.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Fresh Prince on June 17, 2007, 01:13:58 AM
Bond is the epitome of class, which America then shitted on.

Don't you have better things to do, like denying genocides?
That's am nintendo, dumbass.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: CajoleJuice on June 17, 2007, 01:14:30 AM
The poker scenes weren't that bad, other than the fact that the actual poker was awful.

And actually, that's futami. :lol
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Phoenix Dark on June 17, 2007, 01:17:12 AM
Bond is the epitome of class, which America then shitted on.

Don't you have better things to do, like denying genocides?
That's am nintendo, dumbass.

I'm sorry, you guys all smell the same to me
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Himu on June 17, 2007, 01:17:48 AM
Michelle, I really want you to have your old name back and your normal member rights back...but sometimes...I just don't know.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Phoenix Dark on June 17, 2007, 01:19:05 AM
Sorry, but idiotic bashes on "America" tend to piss me off
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Fresh Prince on June 17, 2007, 01:30:55 AM
Sorry, but idiotic bashes on "America" tend to piss me off
Boo whoo, poor PD. Amerikkka couldn't give a fuck about you.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Phoenix Dark on June 17, 2007, 01:32:35 AM
 :lol
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: brawndolicious on June 17, 2007, 01:36:44 AM
Bond is the epitome of class, which America then shitted on.
Don't you have better things to do, like denying genocides?
That's am nintendo, dumbass.
what?
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Mupepe on June 17, 2007, 01:40:41 AM
uhhh Powerslave is the genocide denier
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: CajoleJuice on June 17, 2007, 01:42:04 AM
uhhh Powerslave is the genocide denier

Oh yeah, futami is the one that denies AIDS exists.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Fresh Prince on June 17, 2007, 01:42:29 AM
what?
Sorry, that was Powerslave.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: brawndolicious on June 17, 2007, 01:45:31 AM
okay, and futami claimed having sex, plus being unprotected so maybe that's where you got the idea he doesn't care about aids.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Madrun Badrun on June 17, 2007, 02:14:38 AM
Ronin is how an action movie should be done; none of that fast past shit like in CR!   :maf
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: brawndolicious on June 17, 2007, 02:18:47 AM
CR had no action.  it was pure shit.  maybe I don't get the details in it and they're less trivial to bond fans but it seriously didn't seem that great.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Madrun Badrun on June 17, 2007, 02:21:04 AM
it had action, remember the chase seen in the beginning?  How the camera changed so fast it almost made me sick!  grrrrrrr
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: brawndolicious on June 17, 2007, 02:24:51 AM
it had action, remember the chase seen in the beginning?  How the camera changed so fast it almost made me sick!  grrrrrrr
it had crappy action where it had action but I was more pissed off by the stupid story.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Solo on June 17, 2007, 08:37:41 AM
am nintendo hating CR is all the validation I need.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Phoenix Dark on June 17, 2007, 11:35:27 AM
It's an 8.5 at least. The action in the beginning is indeed good, although somewhat of a "wtf is going on" moment. My problem is the casino scenes, and what happens after the final casino scene. Including the twist
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: bud on June 17, 2007, 03:08:32 PM
Ronin is how an action movie should be done; none of that fast past shit like in CR!   :maf

ronin has some of the best car chase scenes ever.

it also happens to be deniro's last truly awesome movie :(
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Phoenix Dark on June 17, 2007, 03:16:29 PM
Came out a couple years before Ronin, but this needs more De Niro luvvvv

[youtube=425,350]py0USuvtmxA[/youtube]
 :bow :bow
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: bud on June 17, 2007, 03:19:41 PM
i liked the first half of the movie, when they were kids, more than the 2nd half of the movie when they're all grown up.

kevin bacon... :'(
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Phoenix Dark on June 17, 2007, 03:22:49 PM
i liked the first half of the movie, when they were kids, more than the 2nd half of the movie when they're all grown up.

kevin bacon... :'(

Well duh. The first half is superior because that's the meat of the movie. It sets up the second half, which ain't bad itself.

The first half is almost a 10/10 imo, while the grown up bits are a 8.5. Overall: 9.5  :bow
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Madrun Badrun on June 17, 2007, 03:24:10 PM
Came out a couple years before Ronin, but this needs more De Niro luvvvv

[youtube=425,350]py0USuvtmxA[/youtube]
 :bow :bow

Sleepers ins awesome.  I own it. 
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: CajoleJuice on June 17, 2007, 03:38:03 PM
Ronin rocks so hard.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: bud on June 24, 2007, 04:26:39 PM
you know what, i agree. bourne is infinitely more badass but one thing that bond has that bourne doesn't have is the honeys :(

you forgot one poster btw
[img]http://imageshock.eu/img/p2-6cv1.jpg[img]

:bow

FORGIVE ME LORD FOR I HAVE SINNED. I TAKE IT BACK.

i finished watching it a while ago: CASINO ROYALE >>>> BOTH BOURNE MOVIES COMBINED

martin campbell + daniel craig :bow :bow daniel craig's bond blows away bourne's character.

casino royale :bow

spoiler (click to show/hide)
cajole is crazy
[close]
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Van Cruncheon on June 24, 2007, 04:57:28 PM
casino royale wasn't bad -- bond was really hardcore and off-the hook, which is a great change from the pierce brosnan smarm -- but MAN that movie has serious fucking pacing issues. i watched it last night after 5 eps of the shield and i fell asleep about halfway into it.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: CajoleJuice on June 24, 2007, 05:00:40 PM
VIC MACKEY :bow
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: TakingBackSunday on June 24, 2007, 05:29:37 PM
Just because it slows down for the poker scenes doesn't mean it has "pacing issues."
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: CajoleJuice on June 24, 2007, 07:43:29 PM
It slowed down near the end too.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: TakingBackSunday on June 25, 2007, 12:26:55 AM
That's true.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: Solo on June 25, 2007, 08:35:45 AM
BrandNew, Im one of the biggest CR supporters youll find, but its biggest flaw is EASILY pacing/structure issues. For starters, its got one of the most bizarre structures ever. The first third is an action movie, the second third is a suspense/thriller, and the final third is a love story. How many blockbusters contain 90% of their action in the first 40 minutes? And finally, it could have used some editing. At almost 2.5 hours, I think a good 15-20 mimutes of fat could have been trimmed. But I tend to let that slide, as origin films are often bulky like this. Bond 22 should hopefully be leaner and meaner now that we've got the introduction of the 21st century Bond out of the way.



FORGIVE ME LORD FOR I HAVE SINNED. I TAKE IT BACK.

i finished watching it a while ago: CASINO ROYALE >>>> BOTH BOURNE MOVIES COMBINED

[/spoiler]

Good man!
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: bud on June 25, 2007, 08:43:53 AM
i made a thread about it: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=166148

i agree with the pacing issues but it was only in the last 15 minutes orso. it gave a lotr:rotk vibe and i was thinking: ''why is this taking so long?'' i guess i didn't mind it that much because there was still a little twist after that but it could use some editing in that part, yes.
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: bud on June 29, 2007, 05:33:05 PM
NEW POSTER
(http://www.aolcdn.com/moviefeatures/bourne-ultimatum-poster-425)

it's meh but still BOURNE OMG
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: CajoleJuice on June 29, 2007, 05:34:52 PM
August will be the first good month of the year for me. YES
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: bud on June 29, 2007, 05:39:52 PM
i also found this and i believe it's supposed to come out in august/september too

(http://imageshock.eu/img/rush3.jpg)

the third one is finally coming out  :-*
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: thekavorka on June 29, 2007, 06:34:01 PM
August will be awesome.

Bourne
Rush Hour
Superbad
Title: Re: Bourne > Bond
Post by: CajoleJuice on June 30, 2007, 02:25:29 AM
Theatrical Trailer is OUT

http://www.apple.com/trailers/universal/thebourneultimatum/

HOLY FUCK