THE BORE

General => The Superdeep Borehole => Topic started by: Stoney Mason on March 23, 2014, 10:16:14 PM

Title: God's Not Dead 3 (and God's Not Dead Expanded Universe) Discussion
Post by: Stoney Mason on March 23, 2014, 10:16:14 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mt8Wd7CEg4U


Quote
Present-day college freshman and devout Christian, Josh Wheaton (Shane Harper), finds his faith challenged on his first day of Philosophy class by the dogmatic and argumentative Professor Radisson (Kevin Sorbo). Radisson begins class by informing students that they will need to disavow, in writing, the existence of God on that first day, or face a failing grade. As other students in the class begin scribbling the words “God Is Dead” on pieces of paper as instructed, Josh find himself at a crossroads, having to choose between his faith and his future. Josh offers a nervous refusal, provoking an irate reaction from his smug professor. Radisson assigns him a daunting task: if Josh will not admit that “God Is Dead,” he must prove God’s existence by presenting well-researched, intellectual arguments and evidence over the course of the semester, and engage Radisson in a head-to-head debate in front of the class. If Josh fails to convince his classmates of God’s existence, he will fail the course and hinder his lofty academic goals.

 :lawd

Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: Great Rumbler on March 23, 2014, 10:20:02 PM
Ruin your future because you failed a university philosophy class? LMAO :neogaf
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: nudemacusers on March 23, 2014, 10:21:49 PM
ivory tower homolectuals corrupting our youth  >:(

watch for a duck dynasty cameo! :goty
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: benjipwns on March 23, 2014, 10:23:37 PM
He then went on to direct the billion dollar grossing Avengers movie.
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: Himu on March 23, 2014, 10:38:15 PM
The atheist agenda is real
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: nudemacusers on March 23, 2014, 10:40:01 PM
seriously tho where is kirk cameron and that fat kid from two and a half men? you'd think they'd be on the casting couch pew for this one.
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: Mandark on March 23, 2014, 10:41:37 PM
Is this the first chain e-mail to be adapted for film?
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: Phoenix Dark on March 23, 2014, 10:46:03 PM
I was once a good student with a promising future, however I failed my Philosophy 150 in my sophomore year of college. Now I'm homeless with no means of continuing my education or pursuing a professional career.

Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: Dickie Dee on March 23, 2014, 10:54:05 PM
Kevin Sorbo doing MacBeth @0:35 :dead
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: Joe Molotov on March 23, 2014, 11:00:06 PM
Is this the first chain e-mail to be adapted for film?

Spoilers: At the end a marine comes in and said, God's busy today so he sent me, and the limp-wristed professor runs away in tears and the religious student reads Scripture to the class for the rest of the period.
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: benjipwns on March 23, 2014, 11:01:27 PM
I have to admit, after watching the trailer I kinda want to watch this now. At least to see how he "wins" and stuff.

Plus that always great conflict with the girlfriend/love interest over his UNFLINCHING CRUSADE will probably pay off with dem holy feelz at the end.

Thankfully I think there's some Christian movie channel on channel 1283 or something like that which will probably air it in six months.

EDIT: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Up_(TV_network) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Up_(TV_network))
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: Broseidon on March 23, 2014, 11:14:19 PM
Is this the first chain e-mail to be adapted for film?

Spoilers: At the end a marine comes in and said, God's busy today so he sent me, and the limp-wristed professor runs away in tears and the religious student reads Scripture to the class for the rest of the period.

And that marine was Albert Einstein :smug
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: Diunx on March 24, 2014, 12:16:33 AM
That shit is actually releasing over here! meanwhile I'll have to wait for a webrip or something to watch The Raid 2 :snoop
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: Barry Egan on March 24, 2014, 12:33:14 AM
definitely watching this.
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: Joe Molotov on March 24, 2014, 12:34:10 AM
That shit is actually releasing over here! meanwhile I'll have to wait for a webrip or something to watch The Raid 2 :snoop

Live in a third world country, brehs.
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: Joe Molotov on March 24, 2014, 12:48:18 AM
Quote
Played by Harper as a nice, clean-cut kid who doesn’t really want to ruffle anybody’s feathers, but who comes to believe that “God wants somebody to defend him,” Josh just might be the Almighty’s worst advocate since William Jennings Bryan. (http://variety.com/2014/film/reviews/film-review-gods-not-dead-1201142881/)

:dead
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: The Sceneman on March 24, 2014, 12:48:44 AM
sooooo goddamn watching this
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: Momo on March 24, 2014, 12:58:50 AM
neogaf the movie
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: Joe Molotov on March 24, 2014, 12:59:43 AM
Doesn't support Young Earth Creationism, avoid brehs. Creation.com says it uses weak sauce arguments that would get swatted into the stands by any serious atheist.

http://creation.com/gods-not-dead-review

spoiler (click to show/hide)
This is where we anticipated the movie could have made its major ‘equipping’ contribution, but unfortunately, each of the points Josh tries to put forward to prove God’s existence are arguments that atheists would easily refute. In the first session, Josh equates the big bang to what we would expect if God spoke the universe into existence. Of course, CMI has long demonstrated how the big problem with the big bang theory is that it is supposed to have happened billions of years ago. With the sun allegedly appearing millions of years before the earth, for example, it stands in complete opposition to the very creation passages in Genesis which Josh is supposed to be defending. He even affirms an age of the universe of billions of years, which clearly stands contrary to the biblical account. To be fair, he does give a good answer to “Who created God?”, which is perhaps the only solid apologetic in this section.

In the second section, Josh talks about the problems of life coming from non-life, but then implies that God could be behind the seemingly-random process of evolution. But an informed atheist could respond that evolution is a wasteful, cruel process; why would anyone worship God if He used a cruel wasteful evolutionary process? Perhaps the producers have not realized that most atheistic evolutionists don’t really respect Christians who believe in evolution. Just ask the ‘high priest’ of atheistic evolution, Professor Richard Dawkins, who once said that theological attempts to marry the Bible and evolution are “seriously deluded.” In this sense, who is the movie trying to win over?

In the third and final lecture, Josh tackles the problem of evil by saying that it is a necessary consequence of free will. But the very biblical creation account Josh claims to be defending is clear that evil is a consequence of sin, not a necessary companion to free will.
Spoiler alert

These weak arguments are presented as overtly intimidating to the ‘infamously stout’ atheist professor and predictably, the stereotypical triumph of Josh’s arguments over the confounded professor leads to what seems to be the dramatic conversion of the entire class. This is not a realistic scenario. Given these somewhat basic and flawed arguments, they would not be at all convincing to an informed opponent, and no atheist of Professor Radisson’s supposed caliber would be unfamiliar with them. The danger we fear is that hapless college students may take these weak arguments, try to use them, and get shot down. Instead of concluding that there is something wrong with the arguments, they could think that Christianity is false, and it would damage their faith.
[close]
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: benjipwns on March 24, 2014, 01:19:06 AM
neogaf the movie
That'd be more like if the movie had a valiant atheist standing up for a female in front of the whole class against a sexist professor and her falling in love (in part because of his Triforce shirt) and becoming his sex slave. And then at the end of the movie it zooms out to him sitting creepily in the back row of the class staring at the back of some girls' head and sweating.

spoiler (click to show/hide)
PM offers on script rights
[close]
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: Himu on March 24, 2014, 01:22:15 AM
in college religion class my professor made me write GOD IS NOT REAL on my forehead

i cried

then I looked in a mirror and realized i wrote it backwards
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: benjipwns on March 24, 2014, 01:25:20 AM
Quote
This is not a realistic scenario. Given these somewhat basic and flawed arguments, they would not be at all convincing to an informed opponent, and no atheist of Professor Radisson’s supposed caliber would be unfamiliar with them.
I kinda like the idea that this feared professor is actually a fraud whose only background is skimming a Richard Dawkins book. Thus why he teaches Philosophy 150 and does such dumb stuff like open class with GOD IS DEAD.
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: HyperZoneWasAwesome on March 24, 2014, 03:08:11 AM
That shit is actually releasing over here! meanwhile I'll have to wait for a webrip or something to watch The Raid 2 :snoop
there is a very good chance that this film will make significantly more money then The Raid 2 will, at least in America.
As its already, in its first weekend, surpassed twice over The Raid 1's total American haul.

also, the grammer of this movie's title irritates me.  Wouldn't God is Not Dead be better?  Does the student/protagonist fail English too?
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: nudemacusers on March 24, 2014, 04:09:16 AM
I’ve been watching movies for over 50 years, going back to the old classics on my parents black and white TV with rabbit ears. It’s rare that a movie pushes my buttons anymore. I frankly expected some cheesy six-day creationist Bible-thumping embarrassment, like I’ve seen so many times before, but this low-budget, faith inspired movie really hit it out of the ball park for me. Why? It’s effectiveness in addressing the almost daily assaults on Christianity. (Think of the grossly historically inaccurate cartoon at the beginning of the new Cosmos series.) It took head-on the attacks from academia, the media, the amoral business world, phony self-professing Christians and even Islam. The acting was first rate. We tried to go to a late showing Friday but it was sold out and had to buy tickets in advance. If you’re not a totally committed secular progressive droog, you ought to catch this one.
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: benjipwns on March 24, 2014, 04:23:13 AM
Thanks for the informative review, this is why I come to The Bore, common sense pro-family reviews and comments.
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: Himu on March 24, 2014, 09:35:39 AM
Thank you for an unbiased view
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: chronovore on March 24, 2014, 08:48:11 PM
http://variety.com/2014/film/reviews/film-review-gods-not-dead-1201142881/

Variety weighed in with a negative; now all those Variety readers are less likely to see this film!

When I was a kid, I remember seeing a christian documentary during its theatrical run; it talked about life after death, but my strongest memory of it was from the sequence near the end, on suicide. Up until that point, people had been talking about going toward a warm light where all their passed friends and family were waiting to welcome them, but those who'd attempted suicide all talked about being in some kind of hellish nightmare world, with demons pulling at them, or feeling buried alive. I was probably 8 or 9 -- it scared the shit out of me.

I've not been real big on fire-and-perdition, fear-based morality tales since then.
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: benjipwns on March 24, 2014, 08:53:31 PM
And yet, you're alive today having never committed suicide.
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: Madrun Badrun on March 24, 2014, 09:54:53 PM
Kevin Sorbo is such an embarrassment.  He rose so high with Andromeda only to far so low.
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: chronovore on March 25, 2014, 08:01:13 AM
And yet, you're alive today having never committed suicide.
:ohhh
 
spoiler (click to show/hide)
:bluesteel
[close]
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: benjipwns on March 28, 2014, 12:43:43 AM
Free review from GAF: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=106044974&postcount=184
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: Rahxephon91 on March 28, 2014, 12:45:48 AM
Man the best movie of the year is 300. You got Eva green's mad titays on screen as she chews the fucking scenery.
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: Himu on March 28, 2014, 12:55:17 AM
This is my first time watching the trailer and this seriously looks like comedy of the year.
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: Stoney Mason on May 08, 2014, 08:01:50 PM
I spoke too soon. Another contender enters.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=13RhGBC5ANI


 :bow2

Quote
In the book, Christian pastor Todd Burpo writes that during the months after his son's emergency surgery in 2003, his son Colton began describing events and people that seemed impossible for him to have seen or met. Examples include his miscarried sister, whom no one had told him about, and his great grandfather who died 30 years before Colton was born. Colton also claimed that he personally met Jesus riding a rainbow-colored horse and sat in Jesus' lap, while the angels sang songs to him. He also says he saw Mary kneeling before the throne of God and at other times standing beside Jesus.
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: Kara on May 08, 2014, 08:24:38 PM
also, the grammer of this movie's title irritates me.  Wouldn't God is Not Dead be better?  Does the student/protagonist fail English too?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZLBmqFiGjY

 :punch
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: PigSpeakers on May 11, 2014, 05:01:06 AM
I’ve been watching movies for over 50 years, going back to the old classics on my parents black and white TV with rabbit ears. It’s rare that a movie pushes my buttons anymore. I frankly expected some cheesy six-day creationist Bible-thumping embarrassment, like I’ve seen so many times before, but this low-budget, faith inspired movie really hit it out of the ball park for me. Why? It’s effectiveness in addressing the almost daily assaults on Christianity. (Think of the grossly historically inaccurate cartoon at the beginning of the new Cosmos series.) It took head-on the attacks from academia, the media, the amoral business world, phony self-professing Christians and even Islam. The acting was first rate. We tried to go to a late showing Friday but it was sold out and had to buy tickets in advance. If you’re not a totally committed secular progressive droog, you ought to catch this one.

Over 50 years?
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: benjipwns on May 11, 2014, 05:18:08 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aUY4WHrONgs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFnV4RLQ27g

http://vimeo.com/82650428
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: Stoney Mason on July 28, 2014, 09:13:39 PM
Watched it.

* The professor is a crazy rude person who is an atheist because his mother died when he was 12 and god ignored his prayers to save her.

* The college student is like Job. He loses his bitch of a girlfriend who dumps him because he isn't thinking about his future by taking on this professor.

* The college professor is dating a former student who is a christian whom he treats like shit and belittles her intelligence. Triumphantly she dumps him towards the end of the movie showing you only need god in your life and not an asshole atheist boyfriend.

*There is a muslim college student (or maybe she just works on campus. It isn't really clear) who is forced to wear a veil when she goes to college by her muslim father. Secretly though she is christian. The evil muslim father finds out, slaps/beats her and throws her out of the house.

* Dean Cain is an evil capitalist playboy atheist who has a feminist atheist liberal reporter girlfriend whom he dumps the moment she tells him she has cancer.

* Fortunately cancer girl finds jesus by the end of the movie and prays with the christian band the newsboys before a concert at the end of the movie.

*  The college student of course wins the debate against the college professor as one by one the students stand up at the end of the debate and say "God is not Dead",  I am spartacus style.

* The Evil Professor still smarting from his defeat finally realizes that the reason he is an atheist is because of his dead mother as he reads a letter from her before she died that says he should love God.

* Said Evil professor now rushes to the same newsboy concert that cancer girl, ex-muslim girl, college student, and his ex girlfriend are at for some reason to try to get back his girl.

* He is hit by a car on the way there and lays dying in the street. Two very boring preachers who have been in most of the movie for no good reason happen to be there just as he is dying and take his last confession to christ right before he dies so he is now a good professor and will go to heaven.

* Everybody else celebrates at the newsboys concert including some bearded asshole from Duck Dynasty that I don't know at all.

THE END.


On a scale of 1 to 10. I would give it Jesus!
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: Atramental on July 28, 2014, 09:29:18 PM
*Phew*

So glad I stood my ground when my father was trying to make me go see this film when it was in theaters.

I would've cringed myself into a coma. :dead
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: Stoney Mason on July 28, 2014, 09:32:37 PM
*Phew*

So glad I stood my ground when my father was trying to make me go see this film when it was in theaters.

I would've cringed myself into a coma. :dead

(http://i58.tinypic.com/1043xns.jpg)

You just saw the movie.
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: benjipwns on July 28, 2014, 09:34:42 PM
The lesson I have taken away is don't repent from atheism and race to a music concert for a dumb former student.
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: Himu on July 28, 2014, 09:35:43 PM
"On a scale of 1 to 10. I would give it Jesus!"

:rofl
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: Kara on July 28, 2014, 09:48:12 PM
I don't understand why Hercules being an Epicurean atheist is relevant to the debate. That's (more or less) the safest kind of atheism.
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: Great Rumbler on July 28, 2014, 10:26:42 PM
Be honest, Stoney, how many of those liberal crocodile tears did you shed while visibly shaking from anger and fear as you watched your worldview being systematically torn apart piece by piece?
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: Mandark on July 28, 2014, 10:38:25 PM
:bow Stoney :bow2

Taking one for the team.  You are truly our canary in the cinematic coal mine.

spoiler (click to show/hide)
Now go watch the LDS adaptation of Pride and Prejudice and report back.
[close]
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: benjipwns on July 28, 2014, 10:54:19 PM
spoiler (click to show/hide)
Now go watch the LDS adaptation of Pride and Prejudice and report back.
[close]
Wait. What.

One of my best friends was a huge Pride and Prejudice obsessive for a while.

And her family's part of one of the weird Mormon offshoot churches.
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: benjipwns on July 28, 2014, 10:55:29 PM
Quote
The film received largely negative reviews outside Mormon enclaves such as Utah; some of the humor and plot devices derive from and require an understanding of Mormon social and religious mores.
Mormon inside jokes

 :dead :dead :dead :dead
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: Stoney Mason on July 28, 2014, 11:01:30 PM
I have some free time tomorrow. I might youtube some of the more "interesting" clips on a throwaway youtube channel. We'll see.
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: Joe Molotov on July 28, 2014, 11:35:23 PM
Be honest, Stoney, how many of those liberal crocodile tears did you shed while visibly shaking from anger and fear as you watched your worldview being systematically torn apart piece by piece?

He probably simultaneously dropped copies of The Origin of Species, Rules for Radicals, Das Kapital, The Selfish Gene, Hard Choices, and the entire Judy Blume oeuvre.
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: Kara on July 29, 2014, 01:37:46 AM
Judy Blume oeuvre.

:dead
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: benjipwns on May 22, 2015, 01:00:20 AM
So...this movie just got added free to watch with Amazon Prime. :lol

spoiler (click to show/hide)
And it's recommending it to me.  :fbm
[close]
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: benjipwns on May 22, 2015, 01:41:36 AM
I think Amazon is recommending it because of how many other one star movies I've deliberately watched on their service.

Okay, not think. Hope.
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: Great Rumbler on May 22, 2015, 09:17:57 AM
Amazon saw you watching all those Satan movies, benji, it knows you need to get some Jesus in your life.
Title: Re: God is back and he's still not Dead!
Post by: Stoney Mason on October 26, 2015, 07:04:42 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11hSq-WgSys

(http://i61.tinypic.com/a4ahkw.png)
Title: Re: God is back and he's still not Dead!
Post by: VomKriege on October 26, 2015, 07:52:36 AM
Obligatory :

http://www.chick.com/m/reading/tracts/readtract.asp?stk=0055
Title: Re: God is back and he's still not Dead!
Post by: toku on October 26, 2015, 01:56:51 PM
Girl in that trailer screencap is cute. Not gonna watch the trailer though.
Title: Re: God is back and he's still not Dead!
Post by: Joe Molotov on October 26, 2015, 02:00:45 PM
Girl in that trailer screencap is cute. Not gonna watch the trailer though.

Is she the filthy atheist that gets hit by a car and killed right after becoming a Christian and confessing her sins to a passing priest while bleeding out into a pile of her own entrails? :lawd
Title: Re: God is back and he's still not Dead!
Post by: Madrun Badrun on October 26, 2015, 02:14:56 PM
So he's still not dead?  Basically spoils the first movie if you haven't already seen it. 
Title: Re: God is back and he's still not Dead!
Post by: Phoenix Dark on October 26, 2015, 03:34:59 PM
BTW another Borian has to see this. Stony did his duty, now another must do the same.  :doge

IMO myself and Atra should be exempt from this requirement, given our extensive experience in the realm of religion.
Title: Re: God is back and he's still not Dead!
Post by: Steve Contra on October 26, 2015, 03:49:07 PM
They're going to have to raise the stakes considerably in a sequel if they want my money day one.  God battling atheists after his son was killed is a pretty good origin story but really there's quite a few more interesting enemies of christendom (although I like that they keep hinting the Jews will ultimately be going against God in the two part finale).  It would also be nice to see Joan of Arc come in as the sidekick because that was a really good run but from the casting it doesn't look like it  :'( (but it does look like they're going to shoehorn another love interest in). 
Title: Re: God is back and he's still not Dead!
Post by: Phoenix Dark on October 26, 2015, 03:54:54 PM
Bible multiverse :lawd

personally I'm hoping for a post-Damascus Paul The Apostle film. Hopefully the screenwriter does his fucking research and realizes his name should be Saul in film #1, not Paul. Can't wait to correct bible posers who don't understand this simple shit. I read the book :doge

Title: Re: God is back and he's still not Dead!
Post by: Brehvolution on October 26, 2015, 03:56:09 PM
God put dylan storm roof on earth to test your faith.
Title: Re: God is back and he's still not Dead!
Post by: The Legend of Sunblade on October 26, 2015, 04:02:35 PM
Parents wanted me to watch the first movie with them when it was in theaters without telling me what it was about.

As amusing as watching Sorbo get run over by God's car, I'll pass on the sequel unless ghost Sorbo is involved somehow.
Title: Re: God is back and he's still not Dead!
Post by: Steve Contra on October 26, 2015, 04:04:33 PM
Bible multiverse :lawd

personally I'm hoping for a post-Damascus Paul The Apostle film. Hopefully the screenwriter does his fucking research and realizes his name should be Saul in film #1, not Paul. Can't wait to correct bible posers who don't understand this simple shit. I read the book :doge
It's good they incorporated some pre-Crisis on the Mount God into the character without getting too much into the weirder parts of the earlier books.
Title: Re: God is back and he's still not Dead!
Post by: Phoenix Dark on October 26, 2015, 04:24:48 PM
Hopefully the Comic Con panel will tell us whether KJV dialogue will be included.
Title: Re: God is back and he's still not Dead!
Post by: Joe Molotov on October 26, 2015, 04:59:34 PM
Mark 16:9-20 won't be included in the theatrical version, but will be in the Extended Director's Cut.
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: Shadow Mod on October 26, 2015, 05:09:45 PM
Quote
The film received largely negative reviews outside Mormon enclaves such as Utah; some of the humor and plot devices derive from and require an understanding of Mormon social and religious mores.
Mormon inside jokes

 :dead :dead :dead :dead

Tons of green jello...
Title: Re: God is back and he's still not Dead!
Post by: benjipwns on November 20, 2015, 12:36:53 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sxz-Y-c2UUc
Title: Re: God is back and he's still not Dead!
Post by: benjipwns on November 20, 2015, 12:45:18 AM
They literally cast Satan himself (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8BuqsazOS8) as the bad guy.  :ohhh
Title: Re: God is back and he's still not Dead!
Post by: Oblivion on November 20, 2015, 03:07:19 AM
Obligatory :

http://www.chick.com/m/reading/tracts/readtract.asp?stk=0055

"I could have you jailed for that!"

:dead
Title: Re: God is back and he's still not Dead!
Post by: milchs evil twin on November 21, 2015, 04:36:54 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11hSq-WgSys

(http://i61.tinypic.com/a4ahkw.png)

Only made it through about 1 minute of that, and it's truly scary to me.
Title: Re: God is back and he's still not Dead!
Post by: VomKriege on November 21, 2015, 04:53:51 AM
Ja, ja, kulturkampf ! Sehr gut.
Title: Re: God is back and he's still not Dead!
Post by: recursivelyenumerable on November 21, 2015, 05:18:04 PM
Obligatory: 2 Godly 2 Deadly
or: Son of God's Not Dead, followed closely by God's Not Dead ~ [Trinity]
Title: Re: God is back and he's still not Dead!
Post by: Kara on November 21, 2015, 06:25:47 PM
Punk's still dead though, right?
Title: Re: God is back and he's still not Dead!
Post by: Shadow Mod on November 21, 2015, 06:27:39 PM
If God was in a coma would you pull the plug  :doge
Title: Re: God is back and he's still not Dead!
Post by: pilonv1 on November 21, 2015, 06:32:57 PM
How did I miss this thread the first time? It's making me question my faith
Title: Re: God is back and he's still not Dead!
Post by: Kara on November 21, 2015, 06:36:41 PM
If God was in a coma would you pull the plug  :doge

Of course. Killing god has been a goal of mine ever since I played Xenogears.
Title: Re: God is back and he's still not Dead!
Post by: chronovore on November 21, 2015, 07:02:12 PM
Obligatory: 2 Godly 2 Deadly
or: Son of God's Not Dead, followed closely by God's Not Dead ~ [Trinity]
The jury would also have accepted "Bride of God's Not Dead."

If God was in a coma would you pull the plug  :doge

Of course. Killing god has been a goal of mine ever since I played Xenogears.
Also see: "Of course. Killing God has been a goal of mine ever since reading PREACHER."
Title: Re: God is back and he's still not Dead!
Post by: Shadow Mod on November 21, 2015, 07:07:22 PM
Isn't a staple of jrpgs basically killing a god or two.
Title: Re: God is back and he's still not Dead!
Post by: Trent Dole on November 21, 2015, 07:10:37 PM
Man I haven't finished a jrpg in a while now. Do they still have the killing god bit going  alongwith the newer waifu all the roris thing?
Title: Re: God is back and he's still not Dead!
Post by: Yeti on November 21, 2015, 07:56:50 PM
If God's not dead, where does the Holy Ghost come from?
(http://i.imgur.com/2skkQcv.gif)
Title: Re: God is back and he's still not Dead!
Post by: recursivelyenumerable on November 21, 2015, 08:05:42 PM
god should just come out of the closet already and embrace being dead. it can be a fun time, e.g., "you can't kill me, I'm already ...!"

Title: Re: God is back and he's still not Dead!
Post by: Kara on November 21, 2015, 08:18:02 PM
Isn't a staple of jrpgs basically killing a god or two.

Kinda, but it's the Semitic god p. much in Xenogears which isn't as common.
Title: Re: God's back and this time its personal!
Post by: Stoney Mason on January 04, 2018, 10:40:22 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jl0Duw2B8zk&

In commemoration of this great piece of art I finally decided to get around to watching God's Not Dead 2 and Live blog my thoughts as I watch it since I have no life.


Movie is like 2 hours and its hard to sit through these movies in one sitting so I'll split it into two viewings. Did the first half tonight.

Title: Re: God's back and this time its personal!
Post by: Stoney Mason on January 04, 2018, 10:41:49 PM
And so it begins.


* Movie beings with recap of characters from last movie and new characters. Pastor from first movie is already being tested. Stubbs his toe. Gets coffee spilled on him. Trouble entering church and opening door because his hands are full. Life of Job.

* First proper scene of movie. Suspicious evil dad character introduced. Seems more interested in work than his daughter. I'm gonna keep my eye on him.

* First scene with Pat Boone. Feisty All-American grandpa character with heart of gold.

* First appearance of Newsboys back in film! They congratulate liberal blogger/reporter from last film for beating Cancer.

* Pat Boone drops first pearl of wisdom in the movie: "That's the thing about atheism. It doesn't take away the pain; it just takes away the hope." The character he is referencing hasn't in fact even mentioned that they were an atheist but its the daughter of evil father so ya know....

* Melissa Joan Hart is a teacher in class talking about Ghandhi, MLK, and Jesus. Liberal troll in class text messages outside world about what is going on this class. Hart is immediately brought before school administrators and dressed down. She will now be going in front of the school board or something to keep her job.

* Robin Givens is in full bully mode as school principal. Tells a student to stay away from Hart. Student is the daughter of that evil father. Rose is her name. Plots are starting to converge.

* Hart meets her lawyer. He is hunky! But a non-believer apparently. This should be interesting.

* School board says she can keep teaching if she admits fault and knocks if off with the religious stuff. Hunky lawyer jumps at offer. Hart shuts him down. "I am not going to be afraid to say the name of Jesus" Game on. It now goes to real court.

* ACLU is now involved for some reason. They are somehow in league with evil dad and going to use Rose somehow in this. Ray Wise is smarmy ACLU lawyer. Says "We are going to prove once and for all that God is dead". He smirks evilly.

* ACLU lawyer makes first tactical error. Uses last challenge to kick off upstanding Marine during jury selection. Now the pastor from earlier in the movie is on the jury.

* Liberal blogger questions god on her blog even after god has cured her cancer. Typical...

* ACLU lawyer confronts hunky lawyer pre-trial. Tells him he hates her client and what she stands for and is gonna crush her. Such Evil.

* Each sides makes their opening statement. ACLU lawyer says she (Hart) is religious zealot. Hunky lawyer says there is no such thing as separation of church and state.

* Union head (that ostensibly represents hart) gets on stand and says Hart and her Christianity makes everybody uncomfortable at school.

* Somebody sneezes on jury. Somebody else says God Bless You! Hunky lawyer wittily scores point by saying be careful. You might be on trial! Take that atheists.

* Hunky lawyer confronts Robin Givens (bully principal) on stand and loses big time. Basically the debate is should MLK's religious beliefs be taught in conjunction with his civil rights beliefs. Givens says MLK's religious beliefs are "controversial" therefore they should not be taught in school. Hunky lawyer is admonished by judge (Ernie Hudson) to stop inserting commentary into his questions. Things are starting to look dark for our christian heroes.

* ACLU lawyer swoops in for the kill. Has Robin Givens testify, Hart once invited her to church at school and accepts donations for a faith based charity during school. Jury is visibly disconcerted at this point. Things are Empire Strikes Back bleak at the moment.

* Randomly Fred Thompson just popped up in the movie. He is apparently a pastor and tells all the other pastors he is in league with at a luncheon that the DA now is gonna subpoena and review their sermons for the last three months. So basically the government can review their sermons. This whole scene and plotline is bizarre and random and comes out of nowhere. None of this has been mentioned before. It doesn't really make sense and the only connection to the main plotline is that the pastor on the jury is at the lunch. Weird.   


This seems like a good place to stop for tonight. Hopefully finish tomorrow tonight unless something comes up.

Title: Re: God's back and this time its personal!
Post by: seagrams hotsauce on January 04, 2018, 11:17:45 PM
Feels like it's been longer than two years since Devo bounced. Remember how annoyed she got at the word 'cum'? Good times
Title: Re: God's back and this time its personal!
Post by: zomgee on January 04, 2018, 11:44:04 PM
shadows mod's not dead
Title: Re: God's back and this time its personal!
Post by: Himu on January 04, 2018, 11:58:36 PM
Ughhhhh
Title: Re: God's back and this time its personal!
Post by: Himu on January 05, 2018, 12:04:13 AM
Like the very premise of the movie. A high school teacher who connects Gandhi and MLK's teachings with the Bible. Okay. Great. It is historical fact the gospel inspired both. But to the point where she's teaching Christianity in class?! And the movie wants you to think she's in the right? :confused
Title: Re: God's back and this time its personal!
Post by: benjipwns on January 05, 2018, 12:07:43 AM
Like the very premise of the movie. A high school teacher who connects Gandhi and MLK's teachings with the Bible. Okay. Great. It is historical fact the gospel inspired both. But to the point where she's teaching Christianity in class?! And the movie wants you to think she's in the right? :confused
maybe you'll prefer Lionel Mandrake's summary of the first film: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=106044974&postcount=184
Title: Re: God's back and this time its personal!
Post by: benjipwns on January 05, 2018, 12:18:04 AM
oh lol i made a thread for the second movie:
http://www.thebore.com/forum/index.php?topic=44081.0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tlkVWnao3B8
Quote
Honestly, all you have to do is read the God’s Not Dead blog to understand that our religious liberties are at stake. But don’t take our word for it. Instead, take five minutes and watch this video featuring Lee Strobel, Rice Broocks, Melissa Joan Hart, and Newsboys.

And one for another of these films:
http://www.thebore.com/forum/index.php?topic=41764.0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VoLW31wzVgw

Quote
Nationally acclaimed evangelist John Luther is the last obstacle in the way of sweeping religious reform in the States. When a U.S. Senator and Luther's own supporters abduct and frame him in the murder of an innocent teenage girl, an unprecedented era of persecution is unleashed. Out on personal recognizance, Luther escapes police surveillance in search of the truth. And suddenly, a once-normal life is targeted by a team of ex-military operatives who wage a relentless campaign to eliminate the incriminating evidence. As evangelist turned fugitive, Luther vows to expose anyone involved with or profiting from the girl's murder; a mission that brings him face-to-face with the coming storm of persecution that will threaten the entire Christian community in America.


I came across those looking for the one about Sean Hannity and Kevin Sorbo's team up to straight up rip off the plot of the first of these films :lol
http://www.thebore.com/forum/index.php?topic=44812.0
Quote
But it’s the message of the movie, and it’s a story about very contemporary, where you have a guy that wrote a book, Aborting God.

And the movie starts out, there is a debate scene going on like you’d see on a college campus today. And the guy that is the atheist is beating the living daylights out of the guy that humbly is a Christian. And the crowd is going crazy, and everything that this guy says, he’s a glitterati, paparazzi, New York Times-loved best author. And so we go through the transformation of his life, and certain things happen to him, without giving the whole story away. We see that he left his wife, that he’s divorced, that he’s taking pills, that he’s drinking, his life’s a total mess. And one of the reasons is he had lost a nine year old little boy. He has an experience where he crashes his car, near death, sees his son, and it’s a journey back.
Title: Re: God's back and this time its personal!
Post by: Stoney Mason on January 05, 2018, 12:30:08 AM
Like the very premise of the movie. A high school teacher who connects Gandhi and MLK's teachings with the Bible. Okay. Great. It is historical fact the gospel inspired both. But to the point where she's teaching Christianity in class?! And the movie wants you to think she's in the right? :confused

If the movie was really just about that specific moment when she goes into the issue then you could have a slightly interesting debate about that. She is clearly a christian and probably goes slightly overboard with her Jesus stuff about MLK.  Not enough where she should be fired right off the bat probably or that what she is saying is untrue. But there is still a line between talking about how religion inspired a historical figure versus sort of celebrating such a thing.

These movies aren't really interested in that though. That are about taking a specific flash point and then using that to jump to the position that christians in America are basically on the verge of becoming jews in Nazi Germany. Basically you would think these movies were taking place in Sweden versus the Deep South in both cases where religion actually holds the social advantages instead of the other way around.
Title: Re: God's back and this time its personal!
Post by: Himu on January 05, 2018, 12:34:07 AM
Like the very premise of the movie. A high school teacher who connects Gandhi and MLK's teachings with the Bible. Okay. Great. It is historical fact the gospel inspired both. But to the point where she's teaching Christianity in class?! And the movie wants you to think she's in the right? :confused

If the movie was really just about that specific moment when she goes into the issue then you could have a slightly interesting debate about that. She is clearly a christian and probably goes slightly overboard with her Jesus stuff about MLK.  Not enough where she should be fired right off the bat probably or that what she is saying is untrue. But there is still a line between talking about how religion inspired a historical figure versus sort of celebrating such a thing.

These movies aren't really interested in that though. That are about taking a specific flash point and then using that to jump to the position that christians in America are basically on the verge of becoming jews in Nazi Germany. Basically you would think these movies were taking place in Sweden versus the Deep South in both cases where religion actually holds the social advantages instead of the other way around.

Right? And that's the sticking point since that's what the movie is based around and you're supposed to care about her plight but it sounds like she goes completely outside of her lane and fucks up as a teacher.
Title: Re: God's back and this time its personal!
Post by: Stoney Mason on January 05, 2018, 12:38:47 AM
The initial flash point is more grounded than in the first movie. I mean you could imagine this one actually happening whichever side a person is on compared to the first movie which was just a cartoon premise. Everything after the initial point starts to get really stupid really fast though.
Title: Re: God's back and this time its personal!
Post by: Himu on January 05, 2018, 12:52:42 AM
It's certainly more grounded, but at the same time fairly unrealistic beyond Kim Davis level of fuckery.
Title: Re: God's back and this time its personal!
Post by: I'm a Puppy! on January 05, 2018, 12:55:31 AM
Ugh, evangelical chriistianity in america is like "baby's first theology."
Title: Re: God's back and this time its personal!
Post by: Himu on January 05, 2018, 12:59:41 AM
I try to not cast stones with certain types of christianity but....yeah, I can't stand Evangelicalism.
Title: Re: God's back and this time its personal!
Post by: VomKriege on January 05, 2018, 08:49:53 AM
Quote
And suddenly, a once-normal life is targeted by a team of ex-military operatives who wage a relentless campaign to eliminate the incriminating evidence.

Are they called the Knights of (Ni)etzsche ?
Title: Re: God's back and this time its personal!
Post by: Brehvolution on January 05, 2018, 10:30:02 AM
If this is the same god that his leaders wanted you to vote for trump? Pass.
Title: Re: God's back and this time its personal!
Post by: Great Rumbler on January 05, 2018, 03:24:54 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tlkVWnao3B8

JEFF FRANKENSTEIN
Title: Re: God's back and this time its personal!
Post by: TVC15 on January 05, 2018, 04:27:58 PM
Give us the rest, Stoney.
Title: Re: God's back and this time its personal!
Post by: Joe Molotov on January 05, 2018, 04:54:13 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tlkVWnao3B8

JEFF FRANKENSTEIN

Excuse me, Jeff Frankenstein was name of the doctor, not the monster.
Title: Re: God's back and this time its personal!
Post by: VomKriege on January 05, 2018, 06:54:48 PM
Hoping to reach the heart of fellow Inner City Boreans :

http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0069/0069_01.asp

- You religious ?
- No I'm a christian.
Title: Re: God's back and this time its personal!
Post by: Himu on January 05, 2018, 07:03:25 PM
Hoping to reach the heart of fellow Inner City Boreans :

http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0069/0069_01.asp

- You religious ?
- No I'm a christian.


I mean, sounds about right. That's an Evangelical tag line. They think religion as bad and that once you're saved you need nothing else.

It taps into a very particular Evangelical thought process. Bishop Barron tackles it here.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TLta2b9zQ64
Title: Re: God's back and this time its personal!
Post by: VomKriege on January 05, 2018, 07:07:45 PM
Leroy Brown sure fucked up that jive turkey tho.
Title: Re: God's back and this time its personal!
Post by: Himu on January 07, 2018, 12:55:03 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxJ2CIe-7I4

:rofl

Good response on reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/Christianity/comments/7oq81l/the_american_christian_persecution_complex_is/
Title: Re: God's back and this time its personal!
Post by: Stoney Mason on January 08, 2018, 08:04:03 PM
And finally motivated myself to finish the other half of the movie up. This was a hard watch compared to the first movie.

 :goty2



* lol. Well here is another random scene out of nowhere. There is a minor asian character who has been in both movies. I haven't mentioned him ever though because he is insignigfcant to anything important in the movies. His role is basically as a new christian who has a bunch of questions about the religion. In the last movie he had a father who hated his conversion and basically yelled at him over the phone from China about it. The father now pops up and tells the son to renounce Christianity and come home. The son says no. The father literally says "I have no son" and walks out. This is all "fan-service" I guess from the first movie.

* Pastor on jury recieves subpoena to turn over his sermons to Obama-DA. I guess they are serious about this plotline. Movie is very foreboding about this whole scene. Sad gospel piano music plays in background.

* Hart and Hunky lawyer have light-bulb eureka moment while licking their wounds over dinner. They realize they just have to prove Jesus is a real historic figure. Then nothing she did is wrong because she was just talking about any historical figure. Kane will never see it coming! Kane is name of ACLU lawyer btw.

* And now the fight is on. This case is about whether jesus existed or not and now hunky lawyer will start calling expert witnesses on the subject to the stand. First bomb dropped. A.D./B.C. on calender Boom!

* Pastor shows up at police station. Drops off letter saying he will not be turning in his sermons for the last 3 months. Obama-Government official tells him ominously "A nail that sticks up gets hammered down". Pastor has weird gut pain after leaving office. I have no idea what that bit is about.

* Okay Pastor on jury just passed out while in jury box. So I guess that is what that gut thing was about. An appendix issue. ACLU lawyer makes snark comment to his colleague "Well I guess that proves there is no god cause they just lost their only juror they could count on."

* Scene at front of courthouse. Christians humble and respectful sit on stairs of courthouse. Angry Atheists stand in front of them yelling like rabid dogs. Subtle.

* Punk rocker chick with blue lipstick replaces pastor on jury. UH-OH!

* Former Homicide detective called to stand who wrote book about how basically you can use modern homicide detective attributes to examine the gospel and conclude that the things said in the 4 gospels regarding the execution of christ are true. And therefore the things said by Hart in the classroom are also true. HUGE bodyblow to ACLU Lawyer. Jury looks suitably impressed.

* Smarmy ACLU lawyer tries to imply that detective is a devout christian and therefore comprimised and gets shut down! The detective wasn't a christian when he did this analysis work apparently. He is a christian now though but that's only after the fact when the abundant evidence led him there. Even punk jury chick is impressed by this. ACLU lawyer looks visibly distressed. Evil dad in classroom shakes his head in woe. This was HUGE! (I was curious so I decided to look up this detective in real life. You can see his unbiased truth here on the 700 club.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5WWDrvUPog

* Another HUGE moment. Daughter of evil dad storms into courtroom. (I thought her name was Rose but apparently its Brooke). She says the teacher didn't do anything wrong. She was just trying to answer questions in class. Courtroom is in an uproar. Judge calls for order. Hunky lawyer wants to call her to stand. ACLU lawyer says she can't because she is a minor and evil dad doesn't want her to testify. Judge overrules him!

* Brooke says she is the one that asked the question about Jesus and MLK in class and all Hart did was answer it reasonably. Case solved.

* ACLU lawyer questions Brooke and skillfully sets a trap. He gets her to admit that Hart once mentioned Jesus to her when discussing the death of Brooke's brother. Brooke now admits she is a christian. Jury is stunned. ACLU lawyer shows this is all because of Hart and her mention of Jesus, she has corrupted Brooke with religion. Jury ponders this. Hunky lawyer looks upset and tells hart jury thinks they lied to them. Skillfully played ACLU lawyer.

*Hunky lawyer tells Hart they are going to lose the case. Sadness montage.

* What is that sweet music playing? Oh that's Hart's class from school with candles in front of her house singing a gospel song to buck her up. Even Pat Boone joins in the singing.

* More christian supporters show up in front of the courthouse to counter those evil atheists. "God's Got this" says one of them.

* Hunky lawyer shows up to court late but with a confident stride in his step. Says he has one final witness to call. He calls Hart to the stand. Gasps across the courtroom. This apparently was not part of the game plan as it surprises her. He announces he will treat her as a hostile witness. What is this hunky devil up to?

* OH GOD. I wish there was a youtube video of the scene. It's impossible to remain in full snark mode and describe what happens. Basically Hunky lawyer puts on a little play with him as the bad cop and Hart as the good cop to warm the heart strings of the jury. Here goes:

Hunky Lawyer basically starts attacking Hart. Start Dramatic music. He demands she apologize for what she has done! Hart tearfully says she can't because she isn't sorry and can't lie. Murmurs all around the courtroom and shots of people asking what he is doing. He demands she at least pretend. She says she can't. He then demands she tell the court what she told him in private at the beginning of the case. He has to yell at her a few times to answer the question.

She tearfully says Jesus asked her "Who do you say that I am?" And she answered "You are the Christ, the Son of the living god." Shots of the jury members considering this very thoughtfully. Powerful stuff. Hunky lawyer picks up from here saying that the jury should decide against her because in the name of tolerance and diversity we can't have a person serving in the public capacity who believes in God and has a personal relationship with him. We should make a mandate that all public employees have to denounce any belief system they have before they take a job. And if they lie we arrest them, seize their property, and maybe shoot them. Hunky Lawyer is basically making a speech at this point while Judge Ernie hudson is pounding on his gavel telling him that he is out of order and in contempt!

Hunky lawyer now reveals his devious ruse. He doesn't believe any of this. But this is what will happen if the jury decides against Hart. You magnificent bastard Hunky Lawyer!

* Everybody thinks hunky lawyer has blown it. Hart is crying on stand. ACLU lawyer says "remind me to send hunky lawyer a thank you card" and smiles smugly again. Even the dumb audience is supposed to think we lost apparently and Hart won't win this case based on the sad music playing.

* Liberal blogger calls Newsboys right in the middle of a concert. They stop the concert to answer phone and on the spot tell everybody at the venue to pray for the women who is on trial for her faith. Montage of every character in the movie praying.

* And by an amazing miracle the jury finds in favor of Melissa Joan Hart! Hunky Lawyer fist pumps. Spectators in court cheer. ACLU lawyer looks constipated. Punk rocker girl replacement juror approaches Hart and smiles and nods her head. You can see a Christian cross tattoo on the back of her neck as she walks away. She wasn't so bad after all!

* Hunky lawyer congratulates Hart and they share platonic hug.

* Movie ends with daughter of evil dad Brooke coming out of courtroom to the front steps of the court house to announce to everybody assembled that God is not dead while a rocking Newsboys song plays in the background intercut with them performing said song.

THE END


This movie is fucking awful. Both movies are the same in that they are both bigoted nutso christian extremist films but the first movie is held up by a ridiculous performance by Kevin Sorbo who is basically chewing the scenery of every piece of furniture available in every god damn scene of the first movie. He's so over the top that he makes that movie funny in its way.

This movie by comparison doesn't have that kind of anchor. Ray Wise is supposed to be that and he is suitably enough a villain but his character and his performance don't reach Kevin Sorbo levels of ham. So instead you are left with a movie that has even more boring sub-plots than the first movie. Even more characters than the first movie. But the same level of disgusting. Actually I think this movie is more disgusting because the logic leaps are even more absurd. In the first movie, at least the professor was arguably in the wrong. It wasn't a high bar to clear to prove that he was exceeding his authority. This movie tries for a more real world situation but then doesn't have the balls to actually engage in the debate despite it being a court room "drama".




On a scale of 1 to 10. I would give it Pat Robertson  :maf
Title: Re: God's back and this time its personal!
Post by: Joe Molotov on January 08, 2018, 09:50:03 PM
Are you ready for Part III of the trilogy, Stoney? Time to finish the fight.
Title: Re: God's back and this time its personal!
Post by: Stoney Mason on January 08, 2018, 10:01:12 PM
I forgot to mention there is a post credits scene where the Pastor gets arrested for not turning in his sermons to Obama DA.

Marvel ain't got shit on The God's not Dead cinematic universe.

Title: Re: God's back and this time its personal!
Post by: Van Cruncheon on January 08, 2018, 10:21:14 PM
caspar van diem as MARINE CPL. TODD N. AMERICA

spoiler (click to show/hide)
the "n." is for "not today, obama!"
[close]
Title: Re: God's back and this time its personal!
Post by: benjipwns on January 09, 2018, 11:54:16 PM
On a scale of 1 to 10. I would give it Pat Robertson  :maf
wow, he used to leg press 1000lbs 30 times a day and said he could do a ton, so this must be a fantastic score
Title: Re: God's back and this time its personal!
Post by: toku on January 11, 2018, 12:09:39 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mSolF3QBVBY
Title: Re: God's back and this time its personal!
Post by: Stoney Mason on January 11, 2018, 12:15:54 AM
Fat Zane is best Zane.
Title: Re: God's back and this time its personal!
Post by: Joe Molotov on January 11, 2018, 04:55:30 PM
The suspension of disbelief when you have to believe that Billy Zane is getting seduced by Delilah. :noah
Title: Re: God's back and this time its personal!
Post by: CrazyDiamond on January 11, 2018, 05:32:42 PM
First bomb dropped. A.D./B.C. on calender Boom!

This is particularly funny because when they started using AD/BC in the middle ages they missed Jesus's birth by like 4 years
Title: Re: God's back and this time its personal!
Post by: Joe Molotov on January 11, 2018, 08:30:39 PM
  :nope Modern Science

  :ohyeah Middle Ages
Title: Re: God's back and this time its personal!
Post by: chronovore on January 11, 2018, 08:34:38 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mSolF3QBVBY

This is the protagonist-flipped sequel to The Phantom that no-one asked for.
Title: Re: God's back and this time its personal!
Post by: Great Rumbler on January 11, 2018, 08:45:23 PM
The only Samson movie anybody ever needs already came out:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPNEYknW6AI
Title: Re: God's back and this time its personal!
Post by: benjipwns on January 22, 2018, 04:22:10 PM
* And by an amazing miracle the jury finds in favor of Melissa Joan Hart!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b858rOO21Fw
Title: Re: God's back and this time its personal!
Post by: Great Rumbler on March 21, 2018, 10:02:54 PM
You going to the Thursday night preview of God's Not Dead 3 next week, Stoney?
Title: Re: God's Not Dead 3: Infinity War
Post by: Stoney Mason on March 21, 2018, 10:32:09 PM
lol nah, I couldn't stand actually putting money in their pockets so I'll wait for streaming.

But I'm sure these guys will.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bc7KEOUi2Ko
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4QjT-AaFyTM&
Title: Re: God's Not Dead 3: Infinity War
Post by: Stoney Mason on March 30, 2018, 12:36:02 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5LZYfu33NSc
Title: Re: God's Not Dead 3: Infinity War
Post by: HyperZoneWasAwesome on March 30, 2018, 03:14:24 PM
I love this thread's subtitle.

Apparently the NRA's Dana Loestch cameos in part III, criminy!
Title: Re: God's Not Dead 3: Infinity War
Post by: benjipwns on April 01, 2018, 04:59:12 AM
https://www.christianpost.com/news/jim-caviezel-chooses-films-to-bring-most-souls-to-christ-after-heartbreaking-message-from-god-222202/
Quote
Jim Caviezel said he chooses to star in films he believes will "bring the most souls to Christ" after God delivered a heartbreaking message to him when he played the role of Jesus in the 2004 film "The Passion of the Christ."

"When [God] came close to me in 'The Passion' when I was on that cross, [He said], 'They don't love me. There are very few,'" Caviezel told The Christian Post. "I was like, 'Well, I'm going to love You, and I'm going to tell You that I love You.' Tell it publicly, I don't care. I'm less afraid of ISIS than I am the media."

"That's why our Lord is so alone — His creatures do not love Him," he continued. "And, He could force Himself on us, but would that be love? I don't think so. I'm so blessed because I get to convey those stories, but do it in a way ... that I know can bring the most souls back to Him, even those that don't believe."

In the recently-released film "Paul, Apostle of Christ," Caviezel stars as Luke, a colleague of the Apostle Paul's (James Faulkner).
Quote
Caviezel told CP that prior to receiving the script for "Paul, Apostle of Christ," he experienced a series of life-changing events, including the death of his friend and lawyer, Frank Stewart, and sobering visit to Auschwitz concentration camp. But what affected him most, he said, were images shown to him by some Navy Seal friends: Christians crucified by the Islamic State terrorist group on Good Friday of last year.

"I got this script, and I read it, and I immediately thought, 'Wow, saints, murdered, killed,' and I thought about Frank being a mentor, and I thought that maybe Paul was a mentor to Luke, like Frank was to me, and it that's how it organically happened," he shared.

"So much of the time when I see these movies, they don't hit me because they're too fundamental or the performance is strong, but they change the words or they lose that human aspect to it," Caviezel told CP. "What I found with Faulkner was the humor, the relationship, that these guys would've had with each other."

Through the film, Caviezel said he hopes to draw attention to the persecuted Church — a problem still pervasive around the world today. The actor said he's inspired by Christians, who, like Paul, sacrifice everything for their faith, as they will be remembered for loving God in a special way.
Quote
Before taking on the role of Luke, Caviezel said he prayed one simple prayer: "Lord, I don't want the world to see me, I want them to see You. You gotta get closer to me."

"It's really like a conversation just like that, and I pray from the heart," he said. "Christ is the most authentic thing that ever was and the people that really affected my life were those that I played on screen, and Jesus."
Quote
From Sony's Affirm Films — the company behind "Miracles from Heaven" and "Heaven is for Real" — "Paul, Apostle of Christ" was released ahead of Easter weekend, perfectly timed in its themes of sacrifice, suffering, and faithfulness. Quietly woven throughout the film are lines taken directly from scripture — phrases Caviezel hopes will "go past the brain and into the heart."

"They slipped it in there; it's a book over here, a line over here," he said. "I took a friend of mine to see [the movie], who doesn't even believe in [God], and he said that the director was genius. He called him a philosopher. And I said, 'Why do you say that?' and he said, 'Well, that line, I love it: 'To live is Christ, to die is gain.' I said, 'Well, that was actually Paul, you know.'"

"But he didn't know that," he said with a chuckle. "We didn't want to hammer you over the head with it."
...

"The power of it is that, when these guys walk out [of the theater], they go, 'Wow, even in the face of evil, God still rests with me and I'm not afraid anymore,'" he said
While I knew Caviezel was quite religious, I didn't think he was this religious. Rather more, like Hollywood religious like Patrica Heaton or whatever.

Also, "From Sony's Affirm Films" ... knew the big boys weren't going to let all these upstarts grab the huge cash from these for long.
Title: Re: God's Not Dead 3: Infinity War
Post by: Freyj on April 01, 2018, 03:02:58 PM
Judging how those movies manage to clog up between 2-3 screens at our best local theater this time of year, I’d say it’s probably a decent money train. Throw out a cheaply made movie that’s just called Insert Bible Guy Here with a wholesome family star that the Bible Belt remembers fondly from the torture porn movie. Make sure there’s a little persecution complex sprinkled in. Watch the asses fill the seats.

I’m fully onboard the Mike Stoklasa Theaters Need To Die plan.
Title: Re: God's Not Dead 3: Infinity War
Post by: Stoney Mason on April 01, 2018, 06:38:00 PM
Make sure there’s a METRIC TON of persecution complex sprinkled in. Watch the asses fill the seats.

Adjusted for reality.

Title: Re: God's Not Dead 3: Infinity War
Post by: Purple Filth on April 01, 2018, 08:38:58 PM
lol nah, I couldn't stand actually putting money in their pockets so I'll wait for streaming.

But I'm sure these guys will.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bc7KEOUi2Ko
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4QjT-AaFyTM&

Its not the cinema snob versions but good enough  :P
Title: Re: God's Not Dead 3: Infinity War
Post by: benjipwns on July 03, 2018, 07:30:50 PM
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/secret-roe-v-wade-film-now-shooting-new-orleans-1124557
Quote
Nick Loeb, famous for battling ex Sofia Vergara over frozen embryos, is co-directing a pro-life story of the landmark Supreme Court case, with a cast including conservative stars Jon Voight, Robert Davi and Stacey Dash.
As Nick Loeb walked to his car with a production assistant during a day of shooting his upcoming feature film, Roe v. Wade, outside Tulane University last week, a woman wearing a headset approached and asked: “Are you the director?”

“When I told her I was, she told me to go fuck myself," Loeb recalls. "Then she threw her headset on the ground and walked off. I found out later she was our electrician."

Anecdotes such as this have become fairly common since Loeb and his production partner, Cathy Allyn, began shooting their pro-life feature film June 15 in and around New Orleans.
Quote
The film has been under such tight wraps that even the major cast members had not been revealed; Two Supreme Court justices are played by a couple of Hollywood’s more outspoken conservatives, Jon Voight and Robert Davi, and other justices are played by Corbin Bernsen, John Schneider, Steve Guttenberg, William Forsythe, Wade Williams and Richard Portnow.

Stacey Dash, the Clueless star and former Fox News commentator who withdrew from a congressional race as a Republican three months ago, claiming the campaign had become “detrimental to the health and well-being of my family,” plays Mildred Jefferson, the first black woman to graduate from Harvard Medical School and the former president of National Right to Life.

Even with the secrecy, it’s been a challenging shoot. At Louisiana State University, Loeb says, “we were told we were rejected due to our content, even though it will be a PG-rated film. They refused to put it in writing, but they told us on the phone it was due to content.” At Tulane, where Loeb is an alum, the filim shot one day, but after the school newspaper reported on the nature of the project, producers were denied a second day of shooting, according to Loeb.
Quote
Casting has been a problem throughout, as actors have walked away once they realized there was a pro-life tilt to the film. “We had to replace three local actors, including one who was to play Norma McCorvey, even after she begged for the role,” says Loeb. McCorvey was known as Jane Roe in the landmark legal case.

Also touched on in the film is that Dallas District Attorney Henry Wade also prosecuted Jack Ruby for killing Lee Harvey Oswald. McCorvey’s attorneys, Linda Coffee and Sarah Weddington are played, respectively, by Justine Wachsberger and Greer Grammer, Kelsey Grammer’s daughter, while Lucy Davenport plays famed Feminine Mystique author Betty Friedan.

Among the crew members who quit in protest was a costumer who left after two weeks “because of the subject matter and pressure from her peers,” says Allyn. Even the director, also a woman, quit on the first day of shooting, so Loeb and Allyn are co-directing. They are also producers, and they co-wrote the script.

When they shot in Washington, D.C., their location manager there sent an email that read: "I have been doing research on the movie trying to figure out who is producing and what the gist of the story is, and I finally found it, and so I am withdrawing from this project. I am a staunch pro-abortion feminist activist, and I will not be party to such horrible propaganda.”
Quote
The movie is executive produced by Alveda King, the niece of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., and she also has a cameo in the picture.

“There are lots of surprising cameos from controversial people in the news that I can’t tell you about — or more people might walk off the set,” quips Loeb.
https://www.gofundme.com/roevwademovie

Quote
The Salt Is Real • 7 hours ago
Think they're angry enough now? Wait until they see how successful this film is when it comes out. Get your popcorn ready. :)
Quote
TruthHurts  • 5 hours ago
From their past actions, I suspect the pro-abortion crowd would make it very difficult to find a theater willing to show the movie. I also suspect that when it comes out on DVD, Amazon will do its best to bury it deep so no one can find it and buy a copy. And don't hold your breath for an Oscar nomination for Best Documentary. These people can't handle the truth.
Title: Re: God's Not Dead 3: Infinity War
Post by: Joe Molotov on July 03, 2018, 08:45:08 PM
The SJWs in Hollywood are probably gonna give Best Documentary to Black Panther, even though Avengers deserves it more.
Title: Re: God's Not Dead 3: Infinity War
Post by: benjipwns on July 06, 2018, 10:47:08 AM
https://www.thedailybeast.com/inside-roe-v-wade-a-disturbing-anti-abortion-film-featuring-milo-yiannopoulos-and-tomi-lahren

Quote
“They’re not keeping people in the loop with the script,” one crew member said. “When people finally receive the script, they’ve dropped out really fast. After people started dropping out, they said, ‘OK, don’t send people the scripts anymore.’ Instead, they’ve been changing lines and scenes before they shoot.”

Conservative actors Stephen Baldwin and Kevin Sorbo were initially cast as Supreme Court justices but left upon receiving the script. “That’s where it started as far as not sending out full scripts to actors, because they backed out and then it was a mad rush to find people to be the Supreme Court justices, and when they got on set they had no idea what they were doing. They didn’t get their lines until they got on set. They were kept in the dark,” according to a crew member.

“It’s a low-budget film. People are taking rates that are less than they’re used to; they’re being cheap with everything,” the crew member added. “There’s Jon Voight and very strong ties to the Fox News crowd. We’ve got Joey Lawrence, Jamie Kennedy. Just looking at our cast of people, this isn’t playing out like a low-budget film. There are a lot of big names flying in and doing favors to Nick [Loeb].”

Kennedy plays abortion-rights leader Larry Lader, while Lawrence is Robert Byrn, a Fordham University law professor who fought against abortion. Other cast members include Greer Grammer (daughter of Kelsey) and Justine Wachsberger as Sarah Weddington and Linda Coffee, the attorneys representing Norma McCorvey, aka Jane Roe; Lucy Davenport as Betty Friedan; Ellery Sprayberry as Norma McCorvey; and Loeb himself as Dr. Bernard Nathanson, an abortion doctor and co-founder of National Association for the Repeal of Abortion Laws (NARAL) who later became an ardent anti-abortion activist. Loeb also narrates the film as Nathanson in a nod to the controversial 1984 anti-abortion film The Silent Scream.
Quote
But two members of the Roe v. Wade cast have been kept secret from much of the cast and crew: Tomi Lahren and Milo Yiannopoulos. The right-wing trolls have been cast in one-scene cameos, with Lahren portraying Supreme Court Justice Blackmun’s daughter, Sally, a Planned Parenthood volunteer who challenges her father (Blackmun penned the court’s opinion on Roe v. Wade); and Yiannopoulos as Dr. David Sopher, a British abortion doctor who invented the Sopher ovum forceps and “who’s performing abortions and feels they don’t matter,” according to a crew member.

n Yiannopoulos’ yet-to-be-filmed scene, Dr. Nathanson (Loeb) witnesses Dr. Sopher (Milo)—who is described in the script as “an Anglo-Jew from India, with an unusual habit of an awkward giggle at the end of every sentence”—perform 32 abortions between 9 a.m. and 2 p.m., an alleged event Dr. Nathanson recounted in his book The Hand of God. “You blokes are missing out on a fortune over there in the colonies,” Dr. Sopher tells Dr. Nathanson after performing the procedures.

Most other cast members are not aware that Lahren and Yiannopoulos are making cameos in the film. “There aren’t even pictures up of them in the production office,” a crew member told The Daily Beast. “Somebody requested that no pictures of them be up.”

There is also the matter of Loeb and Allyn’s directorial abilities. Crew members claim that, given that it’s their first stab at directing and they have little filmmaking background, some actors have become frustrated by their incompetence.

“The first day of shooting, the actual director and the first AD quit. So then they decided that Cathy was going to be the main director, and she has very little experience, so she and Nick have no idea what they’re doing. Shots aren’t being set up right, and there have been communication problems with the cast,” the crew member recalled. “There was a moment where Joey Lawrence was trying to do a scene and Cathy said to him, ‘Now make a face like this,’ and he called her out and said, ‘That’s not what a director does. You tell me what I’m feeling and where I’m coming from, you don’t just say to make a face.’ A lot of actors are fed up with it because it’s amateur hour.”
woah
Title: Re: God's Not Dead 3: Infinity War
Post by: Joe Molotov on July 06, 2018, 12:18:45 PM
Quote
We’ve got Joey Lawrence, Jamie Kennedy. Just looking at our cast of people, this isn’t playing out like a low-budget film.

 :foodcourt
Title: Re: God's Not Dead 3: Infinity War
Post by: Great Rumbler on July 06, 2018, 02:05:43 PM
Quote
Conservative actors Stephen Baldwin and Kevin Sorbo were initially cast as Supreme Court justices but left upon receiving the script.

It was too conservative for Stephen Baldwin and Kevin Sorbo? :neogaf
Title: Re: God's Not Dead 3: Infinity War
Post by: Great Rumbler on August 07, 2018, 05:13:56 PM
It isn't God's Not Dead 4, but I figure this thread is probably the best place to put this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E2plPiSR6II
Title: Re: God's Not Dead 3: Infinity War
Post by: TVC15 on August 07, 2018, 10:10:56 PM
Joey Lawrence playing a law professor in an anti-abortion film is the most 2018 thing eva.

This sounds amazing. I hope Joey remembers all us fans that have been there for him over the years!
Title: Re: God's Not Dead 3: Infinity War
Post by: TVC15 on August 07, 2018, 10:12:14 PM
I bet it’s easy to get one of these right-wing Jesus-type movies made. I should try to write a script.
Title: Re: God's Not Dead 3: Infinity War
Post by: VomKriege on August 08, 2018, 12:13:54 AM
Like all things film, it's probably all about your access to the funding networks. Not sure script duties pays very well, the whole economic model works because the films are fairly inexpensive to shit out.

I suspect you'd be better off writing books. Same audience, less middle men.
Title: Re: God's Not Dead 3: Infinity War
Post by: agrajag on August 08, 2018, 12:21:34 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=50_3J6Go5Ng
Title: Re: God's Not Dead 3: Infinity War
Post by: Stoney Mason on August 08, 2018, 12:06:57 PM
I can only really tolerate the God is Dead films. Those work for me as unintentional comedies despite the hateful messages buried within. The rest of the whole christian shit flick genre tends to be less unintentionally funny for me.
Title: Re: God's Not Dead 3 (and God's Not Dead Expanded Universe) Discussion
Post by: Joe Molotov on August 08, 2018, 12:27:04 PM
I bet it’s easy to get one of these right-wing Jesus-type movies made. I should try to write a script.

Really all you need is a good title, and the rest writes itself

Roe v Wade IS Dead: The Story of How Donald J. Trump Made Jesus Great Again and Owned the Libs
Origin of Feces: How Democrats Founded the KKK and Sent America up Sh*t Creek!
WATCH THIS MOVIE TO OWN THE LIBS!: The Movie the Hollywood SJW Pedophiles Don't Want You to See
QAnon the Movie: I Choose You!
Title: Re: God's Not Dead 3 (and God's Not Dead Expanded Universe) Discussion
Post by: agrajag on August 08, 2018, 01:11:05 PM
I can only really tolerate the God is Dead films. Those work for me as unintentional comedies despite the hateful messages buried within. The rest of the whole christian shit flick genre tends to be less unintentionally funny for me.

There are whole channels dedicated to movies you can't understand why anyone would intentionally watch or fund, like 99% of Hallmark/Hallmark Movie Channel, ABC Family or whatever its called now, any Christian network.

Direct TV carries the Scientology channel, I believe it comes with the default package.
Title: Re: God's Not Dead 3 (and God's Not Dead Expanded Universe) Discussion
Post by: Stoney Mason on August 08, 2018, 01:16:17 PM
oh I understand why people like this stuff. I mean I get it. Everybody likes their world view reinforced.

It's just there is something specifically about the God is not Dead films that is funny. Like it almost feels like a goof. Because those are actually trying to be real movies. Like they feel like something you could legit watch via MST3k.

The Dinesh D'souza stuff or a lot of these other films while hateful just don't have the fun factor of the God is Dead films. Hard to explain unless you've seen them.
Title: Re: God's Not Dead 3 (and God's Not Dead Expanded Universe) Discussion
Post by: Stoney Mason on August 08, 2018, 01:19:16 PM
Apparently God's Not Dead 3 is available via the usual sources so I think I know what I'm doing this evening.

 :P
Title: Re: God's Not Dead 3 (and God's Not Dead Expanded Universe) Discussion
Post by: Great Rumbler on August 08, 2018, 01:23:22 PM
I can only really tolerate the God is Dead films. Those work for me as unintentional comedies despite the hateful messages buried within. The rest of the whole christian shit flick genre tends to be less unintentionally funny for me.

There are whole channels dedicated to movies you can't understand why anyone would intentionally watch or fund, like 99% of Hallmark/Hallmark Movie Channel, ABC Family or whatever its called now, any Christian network.

Direct TV carries the Scientology channel, I believe it comes with the default package.

Is it just Battlefield Earth on constant loop?
Title: Re: God's Not Dead 3 (and God's Not Dead Expanded Universe) Discussion
Post by: Joe Molotov on August 08, 2018, 02:06:19 PM
Apparently God's Not Dead 3 is available via the usual sources so I think I know what I'm doing this evening.

 :P

Bible Class?
Title: Re: God's Not Dead 3 (and God's Not Dead Expanded Universe) Discussion
Post by: agrajag on August 08, 2018, 02:09:22 PM
I can only really tolerate the God is Dead films. Those work for me as unintentional comedies despite the hateful messages buried within. The rest of the whole christian shit flick genre tends to be less unintentionally funny for me.

There are whole channels dedicated to movies you can't understand why anyone would intentionally watch or fund, like 99% of Hallmark/Hallmark Movie Channel, ABC Family or whatever its called now, any Christian network.

Direct TV carries the Scientology channel, I believe it comes with the default package.

Is it just Battlefield Earth on constant loop?

Quote
Scientology Network is an American television network and over-the-top streaming service launched by the Church of Scientology on March 12, 2018. The channel is available on DirecTV, the website Scientology.tv, Apple TV, Roku, Amazon Fire TV, and through iOS and Android apps.[1][2][3][4] Scientology leader David Miscavige introduced the first evening of broadcast, saying, “We’re not here to preach to you, to convince you or to convert you. No, we simply want to show you, because after all, the first principle of Scientology is that it’s only true if it is true to you. So, take a look and then decide for yourself.”[5][6]The network launched with six original shows, including: Meet A Scientologist, Voices for Humanity, and L. Ron Hubbard: In His Own Voice. [7]

There is only one T in DirecTV.. my whole existence has been a lie.
Title: Re: God's Not Dead 3 (and God's Not Dead Expanded Universe) Discussion
Post by: Great Rumbler on September 04, 2018, 04:08:37 PM
It's not the Roe v Wade movie mentioned earlier [at least I don't think it is], but it ticks most of the same boxes:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttwkr8MM9Rk
Title: Re: God's Not Dead 3 (and God's Not Dead Expanded Universe) Discussion
Post by: Great Rumbler on September 11, 2018, 11:29:20 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MeKJjP7jBU8
Title: Re: It's only March but we've already got the movie of the year
Post by: kingv on September 12, 2018, 09:18:31 AM
I spoke too soon. Another contender enters.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=13RhGBC5ANI


 :bow2

Quote
In the book, Christian pastor Todd Burpo writes that during the months after his son's emergency surgery in 2003, his son Colton began describing events and people that seemed impossible for him to have seen or met. Examples include his miscarried sister, whom no one had told him about, and his great grandfather who died 30 years before Colton was born. Colton also claimed that he personally met Jesus riding a rainbow-colored horse and sat in Jesus' lap, while the angels sang songs to him. He also says he saw Mary kneeling before the throne of God and at other times standing beside Jesus.

It's not just the priests that are pedos.
Title: Re: God's Not Dead 3 (and God's Not Dead Expanded Universe) Discussion
Post by: Tasty on September 13, 2018, 02:38:51 PM
This popped up for Fathom Events:

(https://i.imgur.com/Xyao5gV.jpg)
Title: Re: God's Not Dead 3 (and God's Not Dead Expanded Universe) Discussion
Post by: Joe Molotov on September 13, 2018, 04:17:34 PM
 :cac :cac :cac :cac :cac :cac :cac
Title: Re: God's Not Dead 3 (and God's Not Dead Expanded Universe) Discussion
Post by: Joe Molotov on September 13, 2018, 04:22:17 PM
https://www1.cbn.com/cbnnews/entertainment/2018/september/the-trump-prophecy-hitting-theaters-how-god-told-this-firefighter-his-plan-for-america

Quote
Taylor says he went into his office, got out a pen and paper, and started to write what he says the Holy Spirit told him.

"He was saying basically that America was going to prosper like never before; Israel and America, the ties between the two countries would be stronger than ever before; the dollar would be the strongest it's ever been; it was very detailed as far as what God was showing me," Taylor said.

Oh yeah, sounds super detailed, bro. And very consistent with God's message from the Bible. The Book of Daniel is pretty much all about how the American Dollar is gonna be really strong against the Euro.
Title: Re: God's Not Dead 3 (and God's Not Dead Expanded Universe) Discussion
Post by: Great Rumbler on September 13, 2018, 05:07:34 PM
Please let this movie run in Springfield so we can get a Midnight Screenings Review videos, please.
Title: Re: God's Not Dead 3 (and God's Not Dead Expanded Universe) Discussion
Post by: Joe Molotov on September 14, 2018, 03:14:46 PM
https://twitter.com/TheOnion/status/1040636076833030145