THE BORE

General => The Superdeep Borehole => Topic started by: Wrath2X on October 06, 2014, 12:00:17 PM

Title: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Wrath2X on October 06, 2014, 12:00:17 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nNHsA4WIFvc

http://deadline.com/2014/10/twin-peaks-series-showtime-david-lynch-mark-frost-845804/

Nine new episodes all directed by Lynch! On Showtime in 2016.

HOLY FUCKING SHIT YESSSS!!!!
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back!
Post by: Human Snorenado on October 06, 2014, 12:02:31 PM
ESCH YOU SHUT THE FUCK UP

*MASTURBATES FURIOUSLY*
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back!
Post by: Am_I_Anonymous on October 06, 2014, 12:03:26 PM
(http://www.eurweb.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/harry-lennix-blacklist.jpg)
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back!
Post by: Joe Molotov on October 06, 2014, 12:05:35 PM
:dead
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back!
Post by: Phoenix Dark on October 06, 2014, 12:06:29 PM
I'm rewatching S1 right now, after quitting the show a few months ago. S2's first ep was so dumb I threw the show in the bushes.  :lol

Norma>Shelly>>Aubrey>Donna>Short Haired Asian Chick
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back!
Post by: Joe Molotov on October 06, 2014, 12:07:31 PM
Norma>Shelly>>Aubrey>Donna>Short Haired Asian Chick

Cooper > *
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back!
Post by: Himu on October 06, 2014, 12:08:48 PM
One of my favorite directors comes back? Out of the blue? Is this real life? Is this a joke?
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back!
Post by: Cerveza mas fina on October 06, 2014, 12:09:18 PM
Shiiiiit finally an excuse to rewatch it

Some shitty acting and music though in places
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back!
Post by: Phoenix Dark on October 06, 2014, 12:11:57 PM
S1 is cool for sure and you can definitely see how it fathered some styles. S2 though... :kobeyuck . Lynch better do the whole thing for the complete run.

explain breh
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back!
Post by: Am_I_Anonymous on October 06, 2014, 12:12:36 PM
Shiiiiit finally an excuse to rewatch it

Some shitty acting and music though in places

I am hoping they have full control over the series and aren't "guided" by a network like the Blacklist is. Great premise, average show, because NBC insists on making it all Spader all the Time.

Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back!
Post by: CatsCatsCats on October 06, 2014, 12:15:16 PM
Couldn't get through it ever in the first place, this isn't for me
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back!
Post by: Mr. Gundam on October 06, 2014, 12:20:03 PM
And the town of North Bend just got super excited for a possible boost to their economy.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back!
Post by: HyperZoneWasAwesome on October 06, 2014, 12:29:04 PM
Fincher is doing every episode of HBO's Utopia.
Lynch is doing every episode of Showtime's Twin Peaks revival.

I expect Micheal Bay to announce anytime now that he's manning every episode of Spike's 'Bros Being Awesome, With Chicks and Shit', any day now.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back!
Post by: Human Snorenado on October 06, 2014, 12:38:49 PM
S1 is cool for sure and you can definitely see how it fathered some styles. S2 though... :kobeyuck . Lynch better do the whole thing for the complete run.

Lynch and Frost are writing every episode, Lynch is directing every episode. That's confirmed.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back!
Post by: MyNameIsMethodis on October 06, 2014, 12:43:39 PM
please dont suck
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back!
Post by: Barraco Barner on October 06, 2014, 03:46:52 PM
Shelly is the best one.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back!
Post by: toku on October 06, 2014, 04:42:35 PM
I do love all these director's coming out to shoot their own shoes after Soderbergh directed, edited and shot all ten episodes of The Knick.

 :hitler
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back!
Post by: Cerveza mas fina on October 06, 2014, 04:44:43 PM
All I really want is X files to come back

Id trade Twin Peaks for X files coming back

Yeah I said it
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back!
Post by: nachobro on October 06, 2014, 04:50:13 PM
I'd normally be staying far away from something like this but Lynch & Frost in charge makes me really excited for it.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back!
Post by: Quaker on October 06, 2014, 05:47:40 PM
So he's done fucking around with making coffee and Pitchfork albums?

I wonder how people will take to this modern version after dismissing the original for being too dated when the "problem" was probably that it was too off-kilter.
I do love all these director's coming out to shoot their own shoes after Soderbergh directed, edited and shot all ten episodes of The Knick.

 :hitler
Well, that and...

(http://i.imgur.com/9OpszpO.png?2)
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back!
Post by: Phoenix Dark on October 06, 2014, 07:06:39 PM
Man this next wave of great tv shows is gonna be beautiful
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back!
Post by: Himu on October 06, 2014, 07:07:49 PM
we need a twin peaks rewatch thread
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back!
Post by: Yeti on October 06, 2014, 10:34:51 PM
We need a watch Twin Peaks for the first time thread
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back!
Post by: HyperZoneWasAwesome on October 07, 2014, 04:24:41 AM
http://mashable.com/2014/10/06/twin-peaks-where-are-they-now/ (http://mashable.com/2014/10/06/twin-peaks-where-are-they-now/)
holy shit.
Quote from: above link
Sheryl Lee... Other career highlights include starring in Oscar Wilde’s Salome on Broadway opposite Sylvester Stallone
holy shit.

(searches for best speechless.gif, decides to leave space blank)
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back!
Post by: chronovore on October 07, 2014, 06:21:54 AM
How I feel right now:
(http://i.imgur.com/Ye7RQwr.jpg)

All I really want is X files to come back

Id trade Twin Peaks for X files coming back

Yeah I said it
Go back and re-watch some X-Files. I bet you’ll change your mind before the series finale.
Besides, you get an early view of Special Agent Fox Mulder in Twin Peaks!
spoiler (click to show/hide)
(http://i.imgur.com/PV64FEh.jpg)
[close]

we need a twin peaks rewatch thread
This’ll serve.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back!
Post by: fistfulofmetal on October 07, 2014, 07:24:39 AM
I couldnt finish Season 2. got so boring
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back!
Post by: Phoenix Dark on October 09, 2014, 09:02:54 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rgXLEM8MhJo
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back!
Post by: toku on October 09, 2014, 09:44:04 PM
Amazing storyteller this guy.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back!
Post by: Cerveza mas fina on October 10, 2014, 02:15:39 AM
How I feel right now:
(http://i.imgur.com/Ye7RQwr.jpg)

All I really want is X files to come back

Id trade Twin Peaks for X files coming back

Yeah I said it
Go back and re-watch some X-Files. I bet you’ll change your mind before the series finale.
Besides, you get an early view of Special Agent Fox Mulder in Twin Peaks!
spoiler (click to show/hide)
(http://i.imgur.com/PV64FEh.jpg)
[close]

we need a twin peaks rewatch thread
This’ll serve.

I quit X Files when it became poo and all about the muddy background plot.

I love rewatching the one off episodes :)

Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back!
Post by: chronovore on April 05, 2015, 07:58:08 PM
http://laist.com/2015/04/05/twin_peaks_reboot_canceled.php

re-canceled.

Well, technically, Lynch is out... it may move forward without him.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back!
Post by: Joe Molotov on April 05, 2015, 08:05:32 PM
It was too good to be true.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back!
Post by: chronovore on April 05, 2015, 08:17:14 PM
I’m not interested in the series if Lynch isn’t involved.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back!
Post by: pilonv1 on April 05, 2015, 08:54:32 PM
Full House next please
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back!
Post by: Quaker on April 05, 2015, 09:18:16 PM
Cool, the world needs more shitty, obscure coffee and 6.0 Pitchfork albums.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back!
Post by: Yeti on April 05, 2015, 10:02:41 PM
Full House next please

This is already coming back.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is [NOT] coming back!
Post by: Am_I_Anonymous on April 05, 2015, 10:36:48 PM
:rejoice

:tocry
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is [NOT] coming back!
Post by: pilonv1 on April 06, 2015, 02:00:18 AM
Full House next please

This is already coming back.

look closer lenny
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is [NOT] coming back!
Post by: Kara on April 06, 2015, 02:05:11 AM
(http://i.imgur.com/RSDbQ0e.jpg)
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is [NOT] coming back!
Post by: Tasty on April 06, 2015, 02:53:14 AM
Was gonna post the same thing, Vul`s.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is [NOT] coming back!
Post by: Great Rumbler on May 15, 2015, 11:06:32 PM
As in all good soap operas, that which was dead now lives again:

Quote from: http://tvline.com/2015/05/15/twin-peaks-david-lynch-showtime-resolved/
David Lynch just confirmed via Twitter that Showtime’s stalled Twin Peaks revival is officially back on — and it will consist of more than the initially-announced nine episodes.

Showtime president David Nevins followed that up with his own Twin Peaks-y statement, in which he announced that fans will be getting more than nine episodes now. “This damn fine cup of coffee from Mark and David tastes more delicious than ever,” he said. “Totally worth the extra brewing time and the cup is even bigger than we expected. David will direct the whole thing which will total more than the originally announced nine hours. Pre production starts now!”
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is [NOT] coming back!
Post by: Tasty on May 15, 2015, 11:26:11 PM
I figured from all the backlash that's what would happen. Thank goodness. The "see you in 20 years" thing was too good to pass up (I figured the revival would happen eventually but missing 2016 would be very lame.)
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back! Yes, again!
Post by: Joe Molotov on May 16, 2015, 12:30:42 AM
Any excuse to post this:

(http://i.imgur.com/YiRUS39.jpg?1)
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back! Yes, again!
Post by: Yeti on May 16, 2015, 01:11:56 AM
mom jeans  :drool
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back! Yes, again!
Post by: BobFromPikeCreek on May 16, 2015, 01:25:42 AM
Back with even more episodes?

:rejoice :rejoice :rejoice
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back! Yes, again!
Post by: chronovore on May 16, 2015, 02:03:28 AM
Will Lara Flynn Boyle be back, or will Lynch flip her the bird?
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back! Yes, again!
Post by: VomKriege on May 16, 2015, 02:20:31 AM
In general, those late sequels are terrible ideas anyway. Especially on a show that was not so rock solid to begin with... That said Twin Peaks (and Lynch)was mostly great for the odd segment and ideas (even the second season) than for the whole, so heh, who knows.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back! Yes, again!
Post by: HyperZoneWasAwesome on May 16, 2015, 02:22:49 AM
yeah but David Lynch coming out of hibernation to do anything film or television related is worth celebrating.

great bloody news! I'm psyched!
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back! Yes, again!
Post by: Phoenix Dark on May 16, 2015, 01:05:12 PM
Shelly and Norma>*
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back! Yes, again!
Post by: Human Snorenado on May 16, 2015, 01:10:06 PM
Shelly and Norma>*

:bolo

Audrey tho

(http://media.giphy.com/media/pA0YIav62jSYo/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back! Yes, again!
Post by: king of the internet on May 16, 2015, 02:08:49 PM
Audrey was the best by far :lawd
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back! Yes, again!
Post by: fistfulofmetal on May 17, 2015, 01:45:57 PM
I should probably finally finish the second season :-\
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back! Yes, again!
Post by: TakingBackSunday on May 17, 2015, 01:50:26 PM
just google how it ends
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back! Yes, again!
Post by: chronovore on May 17, 2015, 04:30:35 PM
Read the episode guide for most of it, but watch the final episode.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back! Yes, again!
Post by: Joe Molotov on May 17, 2015, 04:49:23 PM
short hair tho (http://www.thecoli.com/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/scusthov.gif)

your face tho (http://www.thecoli.com/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/scusthov.gif)
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back! Yes, again!
Post by: chronovore on May 17, 2015, 05:04:19 PM
short hair tho (http://www.thecoli.com/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/scusthov.gif)

Short hair is great.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back! Yes, again!
Post by: Phoenix Dark on May 17, 2015, 05:46:15 PM
I like Aubrey but she looks too young and boring, like the type of chick who tries to impress you but kinda fails. Whereas Shelly looks like she's been around the block and knows what she wants.

And Norma :lawd

I'd get a car in her name :lawd
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back! Yes, again!
Post by: Huff on May 18, 2015, 09:27:15 AM
Need to go back and restart this. Only got a couple episodes in last time
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back! Yes, again!
Post by: Human Snorenado on May 18, 2015, 12:23:13 PM
Audrey doesn't have big boobs?

 :iface
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back! Yes, again!
Post by: chronovore on May 18, 2015, 10:19:23 PM
Audrey doesn't have big boobs?

 :iface

Maybe that’s what happens when one watches too much porn?
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back! Yes, again!
Post by: chronovore on June 30, 2016, 10:32:18 PM
http://dangerousminds.net/comments/darkly_lynchian_mixtape_featuring_songs_by_the_cast_of_the_new_twin_peaks

Nice stuff.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back! Yes, again!
Post by: Tasty on July 28, 2016, 02:52:53 PM
Summer 2017

18 Episodes

Directed by David Lynch
(http://www.indiewire.com/2016/07/twin-peaks-revival-release-date-david-lynch-directing-episodes-1201709267/)
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back! Yes, again!
Post by: Tasty on July 28, 2016, 02:54:08 PM
I don't know if anyone's been keeping up with production, but they had no set episodes when they started - they've been shooting from one long, massive script and only decided the amount of episodes during editing.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back! Yes, again!
Post by: Joe Molotov on July 28, 2016, 02:57:19 PM
*faps*
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back! Yes, again!
Post by: kick51 on July 28, 2016, 03:03:31 PM
I don't know if anyone's been keeping up with production, but they had no set episodes when they started - they've been shooting from one long, massive script and only decided the amount of episodes during editing.

sounds like this will be done right then, getting hype.

might also be the last film/tv thing we get out of him ever  :'(
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back! Yes, again!
Post by: Tasty on January 09, 2017, 05:05:45 PM
https://twitter.com/SHO_TwinPeaks/status/818579369278914560
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back! Yes, again!
Post by: Positive Touch on January 09, 2017, 07:46:11 PM
we have deadly premonition; we don't need twin peaks anymore
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back! Yes, again!
Post by: chronovore on January 09, 2017, 09:50:30 PM
we have deadly premonition; we don't need twin peaks anymore

I'd bet ¥10,000 that even SWERY disagrees with this statement.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back! Yes, again!
Post by: chronovore on January 09, 2017, 10:31:49 PM
we have deadly premonition; we don't need twin peaks anymore

I'd bet ¥10,000 that even SWERY disagrees with this statement.
Of course he would disagree. Him and everyone on his staff have never even seen Twin Peaks  ;)

So he and them just put together the aesthetic together from an overabundance of Coca Cola's Georgia Coffee advertisements during their childhood?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9vgbMUpyzQw
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back! Yes, again!
Post by: nachobro on January 09, 2017, 10:55:09 PM
Premieres the day after my wedding  :itagaki

More excited for Twin Peaks than the wedding :dice :goty

edit: i just realized that sounds really bad. :lol i'm just super nervous about the whole thing so not looking forward to it in some ways. something happening the day after sounds much more appealing
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back! Yes, again!
Post by: Joe Molotov on January 12, 2017, 06:10:34 PM
we have deadly premonition; we don't need twin peaks anymore

I'd bet ¥10,000 that even SWERY disagrees with this statement.

https://twitter.com/Swery65/status/819186562436972545
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back! Yes, again!
Post by: Tasty on January 13, 2017, 06:32:09 PM
https://youtu.be/BdnwXiwnDaM
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back! Yes, again!
Post by: chronovore on January 13, 2017, 09:23:39 PM
I'm really looking forward to finding out how they'll handle his condition, this far after the fact. Looks like he isn't scarred from that mirror.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back! Yes, again!
Post by: chronovore on January 13, 2017, 11:07:24 PM
Weird. He is probably worried about litigation. Japanese people worry about copyright litigation in inverse proportion to how much Chinese people worry about it.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back! Yes, again!
Post by: VomKriege on January 14, 2017, 04:21:05 AM
It might be -total speculation- that he got defensive, denied it and since then is keeping up face rather than outing himself as a fool.
It's not the first time it happens (audience identify influence, creator denies vehemently) and I suspect my idea is plausible because some critics and fans are prone to very excessive opinions : they will often overrate the weight of a specific influence, sometimes miscontrue completely them because they're not that well-read (I had one guy telling me the robot designs in Pacific Rim were obviously Evangelion-like. I feel you can only believe that if you're totally oblivious to the breadth of various mecha representation in popular culture, especially japanese. Similar case as Del Toro says he didn't watch Eva before making it.) and on top of that mix and confuse "influence", "homage" with "lack of originality" if not "plagiarism". I think a lot of artists are short-fused when it comes to being lectured to what they really meant by people talking out of their ass, and wouldn't be surprised they'd deny in a kneejerk reaction.

It also happens that different artists may form some similar works from similar influences without being aware of each other too.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back! Yes, again!
Post by: toku on March 23, 2017, 12:29:50 PM
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C7nWxqWXgAITeR8.jpg:large)

madchen amick/shelly still

 :noah

Peggy Lipton/Norma for how fucking old she is tho

 :jawalrus
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back! Yes, again!
Post by: Atramental on March 23, 2017, 12:32:41 PM
It is trippy seeing them all together and much older. :whew
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back! Yes, again!
Post by: Joe Molotov on March 23, 2017, 12:36:40 PM
It's like a sexy remake of Cocoon.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back! Yes, again!
Post by: chronovore on March 23, 2017, 07:56:51 PM
http://welcometotwinpeaks.com/news/behind-the-scenes-hawk-andy-denise-lucy-shelly-norma-gordon-albert-james/
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back! Yes, again!
Post by: nachobro on March 23, 2017, 08:08:56 PM
holy shit james is bald now?!  :dizzy
Title: Re: Twin Peaks is coming back! Yes, again!
Post by: toku on May 11, 2017, 04:58:36 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsdRG0mJj-w
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: That gum you like is going to come back in style
Post by: Joe Molotov on May 20, 2017, 03:54:22 PM
I forgot this was starting this weekend. Hype af :lawd

Also, thread subtitle should be "I'll see you again in 25 years."
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: seagrams hotsauce on May 20, 2017, 05:29:57 PM
Do you think Inland Empire will be his last? I almost refuse to believe we live in a world where David Lynch has decided he's done making movies while fraudulent Ridley Scott says he's got five more Alien sequels in the tank. Reading his comments about not making another feature basically because of the box office discrepancies between good and bad movies makes me hope he might have a change of heart and do something for Netflix or Amazon in the future
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: toku on May 20, 2017, 06:51:36 PM
that probably depends on how this revival is received
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: toku on May 20, 2017, 08:24:02 PM
Has the reception to Firewalk With Me changed over the past 25 years? Because it's definitely going to be a lot more like that than the TV show, and that shit ain't for everyone.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bd1bbjXCfyY

they actually bring that up in this review and we're on the same page with it probably gonna throw ppl of the show way way off much like FwM did. I'm expecting 18 hours of madness
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: seagrams hotsauce on May 20, 2017, 08:41:08 PM
that probably depends on how this revival is received
I mostly agree with this, I just hope he gauges 'reception' beyond initial critical reaction. he seems a lot more tuned into his core audience than a lot of weirdos of his ilk, especially at 70, so I'm hopeful that he'll have a change of heart
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on May 20, 2017, 10:52:22 PM
Yeah, Fire Walk With Me was some wild shit. Gonna rewatch that on Blu-Ray this weekend, along with the pilot and the finale and maybe a few other eps to get in the right frame of mind.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Huff on May 20, 2017, 11:09:29 PM
So I haven't watched twin peaks but I think I tried years ago. Just left a tinder date where she tried to explain why i should and now I'm drunk in another bar amazoning the blu rays while taking a shit
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Huff on May 20, 2017, 11:50:21 PM
Now is not the time for logic
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Cerveza mas fina on May 21, 2017, 01:37:47 AM
There is some bad music and overacting
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Let's Cyber on May 21, 2017, 02:50:29 AM
And yeah, I'm thinking people expecting coffee, apple pie and comfort show shenanigans are in for some insanity. Since this is Twin Peaks and David Lynch, I'm excited for some insanity. But some people will be thrown off for sure.
I'm excited for this to frustrate the shit out of the online community.  :lol

The tv show "detectives" trying to connect the dots and find hidden meanings in every goddamn thing will be thrown into a tailspin from week to week.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on May 21, 2017, 03:40:38 PM
Only bad parts of TP are a few storylines after the reveal

Nadine thinking she was in high school again  :donot
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: archie4208 on May 21, 2017, 04:33:53 PM
Only bad parts of TP are a few storylines after the reveal

Nadine thinking she was in high school again  :donot

The entire James subplot :donot

I nearly dropped that shit when I first saw it.  Glad I stuck around for the Windom Earle plot.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on May 21, 2017, 10:03:48 PM
First four eps are online. It's go time, let's go!

(http://i.imgur.com/9xgyGjZ.gif)
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: recursivelyenumerable on May 21, 2017, 10:41:33 PM
https://twitter.com/pixelatedboat/status/866474710304833536

tbh Kingdom Hearts with Twin Peaks and its characters replacing all the KH-original hub worlds and characters would own
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on May 21, 2017, 10:48:41 PM
OMG the intro of long-haired Cooper (Bob?) was hype af. :lol
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on May 21, 2017, 10:55:46 PM
Holy shit!

spoiler (click to show/hide)
Some Cthulhu shit just ripped those people's faces off.
[close]
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on May 21, 2017, 11:21:55 PM
Finished the first episode. Jaysus!
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Positive Touch on May 21, 2017, 11:24:15 PM
rewatching the original first episode and it's making me feel like I want to fight all the film nerds I knew in high school that were obsessed with it. there's so much corniness in it I can't handle it. never did make it more than a few episodes in.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TakingBackSunday on May 21, 2017, 11:30:02 PM
rewatching the original first episode and it's making me feel like I want to fight all the film nerds I knew in high school that were obsessed with it. there's so much corniness in it I can't handle it. never did make it more than a few episodes in.

I always thought it was intentional.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: toku on May 21, 2017, 11:33:20 PM
pretty sure it was, slyly making fun of the market at the time
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Positive Touch on May 21, 2017, 11:51:21 PM
ofc the corniness was intentional; it's David lynch. still painful to watch. fuck that kid with the motorcycle.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on May 21, 2017, 11:52:15 PM
The thing Laura kept doing with her eyes in the Red Room was freaking me out.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Momo on May 22, 2017, 12:46:16 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dxUC8QH8miU

gonna watch this first later
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on May 22, 2017, 12:49:50 AM
"That's weird."
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on May 22, 2017, 01:03:53 AM
Lucy and Andy still OTP
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Freyj on May 22, 2017, 01:43:05 AM
I just burned through the first four episodes and if the other 14 were out I'd probably skip work to finish it right now.

So good.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: toku on May 22, 2017, 01:55:12 AM
Hasn't even been half a day and already the takes coming in hot:
https://twitter.com/indiewire/status/866488898343415809
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: demi on May 22, 2017, 08:19:47 AM
friendly reminder if you like this stupid fucking show then play this stupid fucking game

http://store.steampowered.com/app/247660/Deadly_Premonition_The_Directors_Cut/
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on May 22, 2017, 08:41:39 AM
WE ARE IN SOUTH DAKOTA. COSSACKS ARE IN RUSSIA.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: toku on May 22, 2017, 10:37:40 AM
These naked and half naked girls so far :lawd

I liked the little bit of Madeline Zima (http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0956526/?ref_=ttfc_fc_cl_t7) we saw.
 
tall women :lawd
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on May 22, 2017, 12:15:32 PM
Man, that was brilliant and insane and utterly terrifying and I loved it. :lawd

Now it's two week until the next new episode.  :'(

spoiler (click to show/hide)
Okay, so the Cooper Doppelganger has been roaming around for 25 years, while the real Cooper was trapped in the Black Lodge, but there was a time limit on how long he could be in the real world, or maybe a certain set of circumstances that would pull him back to the lodge. So he creates a second doppelganger (Dougie) to act as a proxy for when the real Cooper returns to the real world. Now Cooper and the Doppelganger are both in the real world at the same time, and it's fucking both of them up (Cooper is amnesiac and the Doppelganger is puking toxic bile everywhere and is acting a bit strange as well) and one of them has to die before the other one can be right.

Lots of numbers that I have no idea the significance of. 253. It was 2:53 when Cooper returned to the real world. The door that was marked 15, and then later 3. That whole scene was wild. I have no clue what any of that was.

The Glass Box. Cooper passed through it after leaving the Red Room and before ending up in the Pink Room(?). Then the monster came through a few minutes later committed coitus interruptus on those people's faces. So does that mean the monster is chasing Cooper and wtf is it? And who owns the building that the Glass Box was in? Were they looking for Cooper or something else?
[close]

I need a Voxsplainer, benji help.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: demi on May 22, 2017, 01:20:01 PM
Man, that was brilliant and insane and utterly terrifying and I loved it. :lawd

Now it's two week until the next new episode.  :'(

spoiler (click to show/hide)
Okay, so the Cooper Doppelganger has been roaming around for 25 years, while the real Cooper was trapped in the Black Lodge, but there was a time limit on how long he could be in the real world, or maybe a certain set of circumstances that would pull him back to the lodge. So he creates a second doppelganger (Dougie) to act as a proxy for when the real Cooper returns to the real world. Now Cooper and the Doppelganger are both in the real world at the same time, and it's fucking both of them up (Cooper is amnesiac and the Doppelganger is puking toxic bile everywhere and is acting a bit strange as well) and one of them has to die before the other one can be right.

Lots of numbers that I have no idea the significance of. 253. It was 2:53 when Cooper returned to the real world. The door that was marked 15, and then later 3. That whole scene was wild. I have no clue what any of that was.

The Glass Box. Cooper passed through it after leaving the Red Room and before ending up in the Pink Room(?). Then the monster came through a few minutes later committed coitus interruptus on those people's faces. So does that mean the monster is chasing Cooper and wtf is it? And who owns the building that the Glass Box was in? Were they looking for Cooper or something else?
[close]

I need a Voxsplainer, benji help.

Wow I didn't know you liked LOST
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on May 22, 2017, 01:36:36 PM
Man, that was brilliant and insane and utterly terrifying and I loved it. :lawd

Now it's two week until the next new episode.  :'(

spoiler (click to show/hide)
Okay, so the Cooper Doppelganger has been roaming around for 25 years, while the real Cooper was trapped in the Black Lodge, but there was a time limit on how long he could be in the real world, or maybe a certain set of circumstances that would pull him back to the lodge. So he creates a second doppelganger (Dougie) to act as a proxy for when the real Cooper returns to the real world. Now Cooper and the Doppelganger are both in the real world at the same time, and it's fucking both of them up (Cooper is amnesiac and the Doppelganger is puking toxic bile everywhere and is acting a bit strange as well) and one of them has to die before the other one can be right.

Lots of numbers that I have no idea the significance of. 253. It was 2:53 when Cooper returned to the real world. The door that was marked 15, and then later 3. That whole scene was wild. I have no clue what any of that was.

The Glass Box. Cooper passed through it after leaving the Red Room and before ending up in the Pink Room(?). Then the monster came through a few minutes later committed coitus interruptus on those people's faces. So does that mean the monster is chasing Cooper and wtf is it? And who owns the building that the Glass Box was in? Were they looking for Cooper or something else?
[close]

I need a Voxsplainer, benji help.

Wow I didn't know you liked LOST

Well you should have.  :maf
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on May 22, 2017, 03:04:48 PM
https://twitter.com/meherbear/status/866467584920739840
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on May 22, 2017, 05:13:30 PM
Thanks for the write-up of the book stuff, 213372bu.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: archie4208 on May 22, 2017, 05:18:03 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IGUboLZx3Tk

Been listening to this all day.  :lawd

Only watched episodes 1 and 2 so far, but it's a total mindfuck. 
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: chronovore on May 22, 2017, 07:37:45 PM
Man, that was brilliant and insane and utterly terrifying and I loved it. :lawd

Now it's two week until the next new episode.  :'(

spoiler (click to show/hide)
Okay, so the Cooper Doppelganger has been roaming around for 25 years, while the real Cooper was trapped in the Black Lodge, but there was a time limit on how long he could be in the real world, or maybe a certain set of circumstances that would pull him back to the lodge. So he creates a second doppelganger (Dougie) to act as a proxy for when the real Cooper returns to the real world. Now Cooper and the Doppelganger are both in the real world at the same time, and it's fucking both of them up (Cooper is amnesiac and the Doppelganger is puking toxic bile everywhere and is acting a bit strange as well) and one of them has to die before the other one can be right.

Lots of numbers that I have no idea the significance of. 253. It was 2:53 when Cooper returned to the real world. The door that was marked 15, and then later 3. That whole scene was wild. I have no clue what any of that was.

The Glass Box. Cooper passed through it after leaving the Red Room and before ending up in the Pink Room(?). Then the monster came through a few minutes later committed coitus interruptus on those people's faces. So does that mean the monster is chasing Cooper and wtf is it? And who owns the building that the Glass Box was in? Were they looking for Cooper or something else?
[close]

I need a Voxsplainer, benji help.

I wish I hadn't read all that, but I'm happy I read all that.

The ending of the series, with Coop and the mirror and BOB was so striking, but it left me wondering what happened. I remember Leland resurfaced toward his own end, but it wasn't clear if he was a prisoner in his own body while BOB controlled him, or if he was "elsewhere" when BOB was dominant. I ended up running an RPG set in Twin Peaks to put out my own answer to the story, I was so caught up in it.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: pilonv1 on May 23, 2017, 05:29:18 AM
fuuuuuuuuuuuuck episode 4 was awesome

Very, minor spoiler

spoiler (click to show/hide)
The one thing that I've noticed is that besides the scene with Bobby & Laruas picture, there has been no background music, especially the old background music. The only time I missed it was the scene with Lucy and eating the bunny which felt like it needed it. However it's made it feel much more eerie and it really makes the atmosphere.

Also not sure why Bobby was so cut up since less than a week after Larua died he was more interested in Shelley anyway
[close]
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Akala on May 23, 2017, 10:08:45 AM
I am kind of withholding judgement at this point. It could be bringing it back to town slowly or it could be a massive troll job. At least it's entertaining and novel that it got a second chance right on time.

Wife kind of hating it so far and I can understand why.  :lol

Reminded how eh I was on FWWM. Lot of the mythos behind the show was never too interesting to me and seemed made up as it went along in most cases. The characters and aesthetic made the show, wondering if they can strike twice after all this time.

I just want Coop back!

Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: BobFromPikeCreek on May 23, 2017, 10:13:59 AM
I'm only 40 min in, but the sheer blandness of the Ben & Jerry scene was 100% heartbreaking.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: archie4208 on May 23, 2017, 03:46:58 PM
I went into it with the mindset of not expecting old Twin Peaks, but 18 hours of new David Lynch material featuring Twin Peaks characters.  I can't say I'm disappointed.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: toku on May 23, 2017, 04:27:36 PM
More than anything I think we have to really hold back judgement until we see the entire thing. Lynch said himself he's treating it like an 18 hour movie and less like a tv show.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: pilonv1 on May 24, 2017, 08:13:42 AM
I think the main reason everyone is down on it is that

spoiler (click to show/hide)
Shelley said James was cool which no one would agree with
[close]
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on May 24, 2017, 11:25:11 AM
James can fart right off, where's Audrey?
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Hitler Stole My Potato on May 24, 2017, 01:58:48 PM
The first half of episode 3 is like Lynch trying to do a sequel to Eraserhead.  Seriously, you could replace Cooper with Henry without any even blinking an eye and it would feel like the same universe.   And the whole Vegas Dougie/Rainman Cooper character....  I don't know.  I'll just see where this goes I guess.  I'm a huge fan of this series and Lynch's films for the most part but I'm just not as down with this as I thought I'd be.

And honestly I surprised I don't get that excited to see the familiar characters from Twin Peaks.  It's more depressing than anything.  Everyone is just so old.  Feels bad, man.

Overall it feels less like Twin Peaks than it is a culmination of all of Lynch's previous films rolled up into an 18 part movie.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: BobFromPikeCreek on May 24, 2017, 03:10:45 PM
This isn't Twin Peaks so much as it's David Lynch masturbating. Which, for some, sounds like something they really wanted. And that's cool I guess, but I personally really needed the goofy soap opera stuff to contrast the heady surrealism.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Mr Gilhaney on May 24, 2017, 03:47:50 PM
Much better than I had hoped for.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on May 24, 2017, 04:07:59 PM
Much better than I had hoped for.

Same. I was expecting it be worse and make less sense.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Akala on May 25, 2017, 02:35:42 PM
Episode 5 to be 45 minutes of James playing acoustic guitar duetting with Wally.  :doge
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: pilonv1 on May 27, 2017, 02:51:04 AM
The choice to do no music is fucking weird and not good.

I'm hoping it comes back when Cooper returns to normal.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Freyj on May 27, 2017, 02:35:07 PM
no new episodes this week  :brazilcry
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Atramental on May 29, 2017, 01:16:25 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/8rHkm71.jpg?1)
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: BobFromPikeCreek on May 29, 2017, 02:23:51 PM
...

Alright maybe I should give this shit another chance.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Bebpo on May 30, 2017, 02:34:53 AM
Just finished ep4 uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh  :doge

I thought the first two eps, besides being modern Lynch slow compared to the old show, were really great! Very well directed and interesting.

Then ep3&4 happened.

spoiler (click to show/hide)
Mentally damaged Cooper
[close]

Is the high school mentality Nadine subplot of S2. It's so bad and just drags on scene after scene after scene. It's like everyone waited all this time to get that COOPER magic back again, and instead we get

spoiler (click to show/hide)
(http://i.imgur.com/8rHkm71.jpg?1)
[close]

and a totally shitty Michael Cera scene.

And then yeah, seeing everyone back and so OLD and lacking energy is incredibly depressing. That's gonna be us in 25 years fuck. 25 years doesn't sound like that much time, but the visual change for everyone is super depressing. And then you have the dead actors, and even more depressing is that Albert, who was awesome in the original and is nice to be back here, died making this new season  :'(

It also doesn't make a lot of sense either. Hawk's actor is only 66, dude is acting like he's in his 80s wtf. My Dad is like 68 and he isn't all slow geriatric. The mention above about the Ben & Jerry scene because depressing is spot on. There's no energy that the two had in the original. Again, not all of these actors are in their 80s or older. Some of these guys are in their 60s or early 70s and should not be coming across this old and slow. I gotta wonder if that's more Lynch than these actor's age. Either that or some of them haven't been acting in 20 years and don't remember how to act. idk.

Hoping it'll be good. Some of the parts are solid, and there's a ton of eps to go, but if they drag out this terrible subplot the entire season...yikes. Gonna be all Arrested Development S4/Fire Walks With Me in here.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Kurisu on May 30, 2017, 04:49:53 AM
Gonna be all Arrested Development S4/Fire Walks With Me in here.

What does that even mean. The movie was awesome, AD S4 sucked.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: pilonv1 on May 30, 2017, 08:18:26 AM
Hoping it'll be good. Some of the parts are solid, and there's a ton of eps to go, but if they drag out this terrible subplot the entire season...yikes. Gonna be all Arrested Development S4/Fire Walks With Me in here.

They're actually the same universe

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DBC_JWHVYAAY_50.jpg:large)

Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: fistfulofmetal on June 05, 2017, 11:03:03 AM
Ok so I'm caught up to Episode 4 (going to watch 5 tonight).

I really loved the original season, thought season 2 was OK and it ended real strong. I LOVE the movie a lot.

Watching season 3. I'm really struggling here. It's fucking with my brain because going into this season I knew to brace myself. I knew that Lynch would purposefully subvert my expectations and he's really fucking good at doing that. I knew he would purposefully avoid giving me what I want. Yet here I am, knowing all of these. Yet I'm struggling to enjoy what's here because I know he's doling out the information and the fan-service in tiny tiny drops.

My two biggest problem with this season so far is the lack of music and the city-hoping nature. It's crazy to me that the scenes are dead silent. Where's the jazzy music? Where's the abrupt cuts to serious ambience? And regarding the locations, having it hop around the country makes it all feel so disjointed. Twin Peaks was so focused on that one town and it benefited.

I'm in the for the long haul but this is rough to watch and I KNOW it's supposed to be.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Atramental on June 05, 2017, 12:53:47 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/96v7uIR.png)

 :rash
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: archie4208 on June 05, 2017, 05:58:34 PM
You guys ordered your gold shit-digging shovel, right?
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on June 05, 2017, 06:21:14 PM
I'm glad you guys are tempering expectations somewhat. I'm on episode 19 of season 2, basically almost out of the woods of the bad stuff according to what I've read, and I really like the show. Even the bad parts were OK to have on in the background, there's still a good scene or too even in the really shitty episodes. I almost want to go back and rewatch the first season now that I know who the fuck everyone is and how they relate. :lol But I need to finish s2 and then the movie.

As a huge Lynch fan, I'm game for anything. Everything I saw before the new season (not much tbh) told me to prepare for something super depressing, and that's the mindset I'll be going into the new season with. Honestly most of Lynch's stuff is depressing to an almost nihilistic point, and his pièce de résistance of it (Mulholland Drive) is my favorite work from him and one of my favorite films. Some of the complaints here of "everyone's old and slow and it's making me sad 😞" are actually hyping me up for the new season more than anything hahaha.

TBH I wouldn't have put it past Lynch to just fucking kill Cooper in the first episode or two to fuck with y'all. Anyone expecting sappy Lindelof shit, the door's that way -> 🚪
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on June 05, 2017, 06:23:18 PM
Gonna be all Arrested Development S4/Fire Walks With Me in here.

What does that even mean. The movie was awesome, AD S4 sucked.

AD s4 gets sooooo much better on rewatches. It's not as good as the first three, but it is really good.

The recut, in-chronological-order version Hurwitz supposedly made might even be as good as s3. Shame they haven't fucking released it yet. :/
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on June 05, 2017, 06:24:21 PM
And Lynch himself said it best:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfS_FJPK_A4
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on June 10, 2017, 09:58:47 PM
Finished season two.

Now, Fire Walk With Me: theatrical or extended (The Missing Pieces) cut?
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on June 15, 2017, 02:57:17 PM
That tiny, little Vin Diesel was just stabbing the hell out of some folks.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on June 16, 2017, 02:16:52 PM
Also, a blink and you missed it appearance by the elusive Diane.  :o
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on June 17, 2017, 12:46:48 AM
Caught up.

Purple Room in ep3 is one of my favorite Lynch things, ever.

Speaking of, this popped up:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-BDU-TvlTg
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on June 17, 2017, 11:25:17 PM
Part 6 was my least favorite episode. Hoping tomorrow will be a bit better.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on June 17, 2017, 11:31:42 PM
Something needs to happen with DougieCoop, the man literally can't use the bathroom by himself and no one is like "Is Dougie having a stroke, maybe we should call an ambulance?" I feel like David Lynch is gaslighting me.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on June 17, 2017, 11:44:18 PM
Part 5 was my least favorite so far, tbh. Part 6 had a bit more progression with the best scene of the year.

Ike The Spike :lawd

I didn't like anything involving that Richard Horne kid. Part 6 kind of took me back to part 1, while interesting, a lot of exposition with no payoff, introducing more and more characters. It also was the lightest out of all recent episodes on quirky fun in the town of Twin Peaks.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on June 17, 2017, 11:45:05 PM
Something needs to happen with DougieCoop, the man literally can't use the bathroom by himself and no one is like "Is Dougie having a stroke, maybe we should call an ambulance?" I feel like David Lynch is gaslighting me.

I heard a theory that maybe Dougie was a highly functional autist and everyone around him thinks it's just one of his episodes.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on June 17, 2017, 11:54:15 PM
I'm super into scenes involving Richard cause while he's a douche he's very likely Audrey's son and I just want her to show up ASAP.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on June 18, 2017, 12:19:18 AM
Also, I'm a little disappointed that they never followed up with the murder mystery in Buckhorn from the first two episodes. They'll probably revisit it to tie up all the ends, but it feels like too many episodes have passed between for it to matter too much.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on June 18, 2017, 01:20:08 AM
Also, I'm a little disappointed that they never followed up with the murder mystery in Buckhorn from the first two episodes. They'll probably revisit it to tie up all the ends, but it feels like too many episodes have passed between for it to matter too much.

This is one point I will agree with. I completely forgot about it when Dougie showed up haha. I wouldn't mind them dropping it if not for Evilcoop shooting the wife out of nowhere.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on June 19, 2017, 12:46:11 AM
Episode 7 best episode since 3 :lawd

- Dougie-Coop taking out Ike the Spike (and otherwise barely being in the ep)
- Missing pages of Laura's diary conclusively found by Hawk, and Fire Walks With Me's biggest post-series clue finally comes full circle after a quarter-century
- Diane turns out to be a firebreathing badass
- Body found in episode 1 was Briggs', but 20-years too young :o
- Doc Hayward :'(
- Audrey's been in a coma since the bank explosion :-\
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: archie4208 on June 19, 2017, 06:21:54 AM
Episode 7 best episode since 3 :lawd

- Dougie-Coop taking out Ike the Spike (and otherwise barely being in the ep)
- Missing pages of Laura's diary conclusively found by Hawk, and Fire Walks With Me's biggest post-series clue finally comes full circle after a quarter-century
- Diane turns out to be a firebreathing badass
- Body found in episode 1 was Briggs', but 20-years too young :o
- Doc Hayward :'(
- Audrey's been in a coma since the bank explosion :-\

Fuck you, Andy.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on June 19, 2017, 10:33:33 AM
Fuck yourself. This is a currently airing show and this is an OT for it.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: archie4208 on June 19, 2017, 10:56:31 AM
I was referencing Diane.  :derp
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on June 19, 2017, 10:57:52 AM
That computer setup was pretty dope for a backwater sheriff's office. How much did the county taxpayers have to shell out for that?  :'(
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Momo on June 19, 2017, 10:59:31 AM
I feel like Twin Peaks spoilers doesnt even matter till all is said and done and you had a month to process it all
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on June 19, 2017, 11:43:19 AM
If you were a real fan, Dougie suddenly getting FBI superpowers and wrestling a midget gunman to the ground while the Brain Tree was screaming "Squeeze his hand off!" is hardly even a spoiler, since it should have been obvious that was going to happen. 

Real talk though, this was a good episode. Also real talk, raise your hand if you thought the final 5 or 6 minutes was just gonna be that dude sweeping.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on June 19, 2017, 12:41:47 PM
Also real talk, raise your hand if you thought the final 5 or 6 minutes was just gonna be that dude sweeping.

:lol :lol *raises hand*

I was certain the credits were gonna come scrolling up any second.

Also I noticed him last ep, but apparently that's not Jacques Renault - he's credited as "Jean-Michel Renault." So seems like a Maddy situation of reusing the same actor. He looks like shit though. :lol
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on June 19, 2017, 12:42:00 PM
I was referencing Diane.  :derp

You want personal? How about this: fuck you.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on June 19, 2017, 12:42:35 PM
I was referencing Diane.  :derp

You want personal? How about this: fuck you.

Fuck you, Tammy.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on June 24, 2017, 01:03:38 AM
GAF has the dumbest theories. Like how Diane is really Annie.  :derp
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: archie4208 on June 25, 2017, 10:13:09 PM
What the FUCK did I just watch?
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: toku on June 25, 2017, 10:44:59 PM
fuck yeah NiN
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Freyj on June 25, 2017, 11:03:19 PM
 :dead :rejoice :preach :delicious
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on June 25, 2017, 11:09:02 PM
Ladies and gentlemen...the Nine Inch Nails!
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on June 25, 2017, 11:38:02 PM
Lmao, how did this even get made? David Lynch, the absolute madman. I love it. :lol
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on June 26, 2017, 03:09:13 AM
What the FUCK did I just watch?

..
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on June 26, 2017, 09:45:16 AM
I need someone to hold me. For like, three days.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on June 26, 2017, 10:32:16 AM
*holds*
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on June 26, 2017, 11:28:17 AM
Reading all the entertainment blog takes this morning is gonna give me life. :lawd
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Momo on June 26, 2017, 12:08:41 PM
One day i'll drop a bunch of drugs try and understand this ep and the answers will come to me, sadly it will be fleeting because the second i'm sober again all those crazed thoughts will be impossible to form again.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on June 26, 2017, 12:32:08 PM
One day i'll drop a bunch of drugs try and understand this ep and the answers will come to me, sadly it will be fleeting because the second i'm sober again all those crazed thoughts will be impossible to form again.

The general consensus of the morning seems to be: The atomic bomb created BOB because THE REAL MONSTER WAS MAN ALL ALONG! The alien/celestial overseers of our planet saw this and sent Laura to act as a balance to BOB. And then something something Black Lodge stuff, the end.

Does that mean the Giant is God, the Tower is Heaven, Laura is Jesus, the Black Lodge is Hell, the Woodsman is the Devil, and BOB is the antichrist? (just asking questions)
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: archie4208 on June 26, 2017, 12:55:10 PM
The way I understand it: the bomb didn't create BOB, but instead created a rift that allowed him to enter our world.  The inhabitants of the White Lodge put Laura in a dragon ball to help defeat BOB.

Let's be honest though.  The strangest thing about that episode is NIN performing at a small town dive.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on June 26, 2017, 03:16:30 PM
Laura Palmer being a moonchild or space Jesus or whatever is a little too on the nose for me.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on June 26, 2017, 04:01:38 PM
The way I understand it: the bomb didn't create BOB, but instead created a rift that allowed him to enter our world.  The inhabitants of the White Lodge put Laura in a dragon ball to help defeat BOB.

Let's be honest though.  The strangest thing about that episode is NIN performing at a small town dive.

This is my thoughts too.

Laura Palmer being a moonchild or space Jesus or whatever is a little too on the nose for me.

Yeah it kinda smells like the prequels' emphasis on Anakin and Darth Vader cause he's what the fans knew.

Laura in the actual show was just as, if not more fucked up than the rest of the town. Space Jesus she is not.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on June 26, 2017, 05:35:14 PM
If I have one really big criticism of Twin Peaks, and I have plenty, but this one bugs me and seemingly no one else, is how Laura-centric it is. The show establishes how Laura is this amazing person that everyone is in love with despite her many, many flaws and vices. But where Lynch and co. fail is making the audience fall in love with her, at least they have failed to convince me that she's a special person that I should admire. They made a whole prequel movie about her and it's done nothing to sway me. I read the Laura Palmer diary and it did illuminate her inner turmoil, but still. For me the show always worked better with Cooper as the main protagonist and Laura the phantom catalyst of the murder mystery and the mystical events that follow. But Lynch insists in shoehorning her as the centerpiece for everything. It is what it is.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: VomKriege on June 26, 2017, 06:01:16 PM
I always thought the adoration for Laura by the characters in the show was borderline disturbing (all the more considering what you learn about the killer and all that...) and that there was some self awareness to it or that it played to the satire of soap operas / shows in general. But as you mention, the film apparently (I've seen quite a long way ago) tries to convince us that it's not just creepy projection but how it was (despite having some massive faults to her character).
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on June 26, 2017, 06:55:49 PM
Quote
IIRC I read about all that after I saw Michael J. Anderson melting down and claiming that Laura was directly inspired by Lynch's daughter, (including the diary and the rape scene in FWWM.)

Lynch raped his daughter? 🤔
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on June 26, 2017, 07:18:03 PM
Laura is the world's most special girl.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on June 26, 2017, 08:09:45 PM
I don't know guys, even if Laura isn't meant to be portrayed as a messiah, the entire concept of her being artificial created by a benevolent spirit from the White Lodge is kind of too close to fan fiction planet Garmonbozia territory. I remember reading the script for FWWM a long time ago and people making theories about them "descending from pure air" and space lumberjacks. I didn't want it to be true, but I guess those people were right on the money.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on June 26, 2017, 10:20:28 PM
That's true, Wrath people that are all "this is so obvious " are annoying. To be honest I quite enjoyed the episode, I did fast forward at times becaude the pacing is so slow and I am impatient, so I missed a few things and ended up having to go back and rewatch certain scenes. The only thing that really bothered me is the Laura orb, but like you said, we don't  have a confirmation of what it actually means. The episode raised more questions than it answered.

On a side note, would anyone like a flashback of how Bob initially "entered" little Leland? I guess it's kind of pointless, but would be cool visually. Also, the adventures of Bob and Mike in their hey days.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on June 26, 2017, 10:28:43 PM
I'm not worried about trying to figure anything out at this point, I'm good with just reveling in the weirdness.  :rejoice
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on June 26, 2017, 11:14:29 PM
Also the whole Bob as an egg thing most likely came out of necessity. Poorly done CG Bob running around would not be a good look.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TakingBackSunday on June 26, 2017, 11:18:37 PM
as someone who hasn't caught up to even the new episodes yet, reading this thread is fucking baffling and hilarious
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Let's Cyber on June 26, 2017, 11:46:08 PM
as someone who hasn't caught up to even the new episodes yet, reading this thread is fucking baffling and hilarious
For just Twin Peaks fans it is
 :what :confused

For general David Lynch fans it is
:delicious :shaqc

I'm not caught up to episode 8 yet but I'm really enjoying the ride so far.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on June 27, 2017, 12:15:15 AM
Nah, no way the woodsman is Bob. The woodsmen are woodsmen. Bob is Bob. Eager for fun. He wears a smile, everybody run.

spoiler (click to show/hide)
I thought the CG in episode 8 was spectacular, mesmerizing and wholly appropriate. Most likely most of the budget went to episodes like this one.
[close]
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on June 27, 2017, 12:31:40 AM
as someone who hasn't caught up to even the new episodes yet, reading this thread is fucking baffling and hilarious
For just Twin Peaks fans it is
 :what :confused

For general David Lynch fans it is
:delicious :shaqc

I'm not caught up to episode 8 yet but I'm really enjoying the ride so far.

Lol you have no idea how true that is then.

Ep 8 is literally the ending of Mulholland Drive + the entirety of Eraserhead.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on June 27, 2017, 12:32:56 AM
I was enjoying the season. But trust me, episode 8 is like
 :mindblown
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Bebpo on June 27, 2017, 03:10:28 AM
That was the most boring episode of tv I've ever seen. I really like the slow measured direction of S3, but ep8 was not for me at all. Was on my phone the entire time bored out of my mind. :shrug
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on June 29, 2017, 01:39:05 AM
saw a pretty good theory on Youtube.

The Giant's "wife" is named Senorita Dido in the credits. The word dido means a mischievous prank or a trick. The guy in the youtube video said that maybe Dido pulled a fast one on the Giant, but didn't elaborate further than that.

What if by kissing the Laura orb, Dido corrupted her, and that's why Laura turned out so fucked up?

Another good theory that I read on Dugpa, is that because Leland was already possessed by Bob when Laura was conceived, she's in a way Bob's daughter. That would certainly be some evil heritage she has.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: chronovore on June 29, 2017, 02:43:51 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dxUC8QH8miU

gonna watch this first later

I sat down and watched all of this during lunch today. It made me remember why I loved this series so much, in a way that I wouldn't have experienced if I actually re-watched the show from start to finish.

I'd forgotten about Shelly's abusive husband, Leo. I had forgotten about James and Madeleine. I had also forgotten that the doppelganger appeared in the Black Lodge/Red Room prior to Bob inhabiting Cooper.

That's a fantastically well-put-together sequence. Probably mostly useless for newcomers, but as a memory refresher, it was superb.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on June 29, 2017, 02:49:50 AM
Since I'm only sticking around until the Ami drama dries up, I'd just like to take this time to say I f'n love the new season so far. Part 8 had me glued to my screen. That was one of the most stunning things I've seen on TV. If you photoshopping BOB and Laura's faces out, the post-NIN portion of the episode could be a really cool non-TP-related short film.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Momo on June 29, 2017, 03:41:51 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dxUC8QH8miU

gonna watch this first later

I sat down and watched all of this during lunch today. It made me remember why I loved this series so much, in a way that I wouldn't have experienced if I actually re-watched the show from start to finish.

I'd forgotten about Shelly's abusive husband, Leo. I had forgotten about James and Madeleine. I had also forgotten that the doppelganger appeared in the Black Lodge/Red Room prior to Bob inhabiting Cooper.

That's a fantastically well-put-together sequence. Probably mostly useless for newcomers, but as a memory refresher, it was superb.
Yeah this video worked, it's been near a decade since i've thought about TP before the new series and this just got me right back to where i needed to be.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on July 09, 2017, 10:27:41 PM
I haven't been as high as Jerry Horne for quite some time.

That episode was great. Things are starting to come together rapidly.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: toku on July 09, 2017, 11:23:13 PM
"okay fellas let's have that coffee"

Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on July 10, 2017, 02:59:14 AM
http://thesearchforthezone.com/
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on July 10, 2017, 09:58:31 AM
As I watched the episode I felt myself get frustrated for the first time in the franchise. Just so many extra seconds in every cut that seemed to only be there to add time. The three FBI guys joking around was the worst part IMO. Long, boring smoke session with Diane and Gordon being second.

On reflection, it did seem to move the story forward in a big way, so I’m not too upset. But I probably was expecting more given this is the first episode in two weeks, and the previous episode was a prequel/side-story (however amazing it was.)
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on July 10, 2017, 10:03:34 AM
As I watched the episode I felt myself get frustrated for the first time in the franchise. Just so many extra seconds in every cut that seemed to only be there to add time. The three FBI guys joking around was the worst part IMO. Long, boring smoke session with Diane and Gordon being second.

On reflection, it did seem to move the story forward in a big way, so I’m not too upset. But I probably was expecting more given this is the first episode in two weeks, and the previous episode was a prequel/side-story (however amazing it was.)

Oddly enough, I didn't notice this much last night outside of the smoking scene, and I've seen it called out a lot in this specific episode. I watched it three times, too.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on July 10, 2017, 10:16:21 AM
This was the first episode that didn't click at all with me.

 A lot of it was just inching off stuff we could already figure, the spacey writing didn't work like it did in the other episodes.

 That Andy and Lucy scene was just terrible.

Yeah, I feel bad criticizing that scene because I love Andy and Lucy, and I'd rather see the old chars in the new show considering how little screentime they've gotten so far, but... Yeah. That scene seems pointless on the surface, in an episode with a lot of (seemingly) pointless things.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on July 10, 2017, 10:45:42 AM
I like the Andy and Lucy stuff (mostly). I only take issue that they've been given a lot of throwaway gaggy material that could have been used on throwaway material for other old fave characters. I want to see Simple James in action.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on July 10, 2017, 11:26:54 AM
Yeah I want a fuckton more Shelly and Norma than we've been getting.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on July 10, 2017, 11:32:32 AM
Also I can't decide if Shaggy was over-acting or acting well, lol.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on July 10, 2017, 11:50:03 AM
Also I can't decide if Shaggy was over-acting or acting well, lol.

I think in true TP fashion, it was a little of both. I found the scene pretty captivating, which is what matters.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on July 10, 2017, 12:15:15 PM
https://twitter.com/MatthewLillard/status/884274374882316288

:obama
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: toku on July 10, 2017, 01:35:16 PM
Watch the american version of the bridge, matthew lillard has been killing roles for a couple years now brehs, one of the many weird parts of still being alive/surviving the 90s.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on July 10, 2017, 01:57:51 PM
Lucy makes me uncomfortable for some reason.

Also, Dopplebob is supposed to be the big bad and this all powerful being, why is he necking with some trailer trash women?
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: toku on July 10, 2017, 02:01:10 PM
put some fucking respect on jennifer jason leigh's (bae) god damn name
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on July 10, 2017, 02:20:37 PM
Finally felt like an episode of  Twin Peaks, not Twin Peaks The Return. Music cues  :rejoice :rejoice

I did notice the music cues and it actually kinda shocked me on, like, a subconscious level. In a good way. Basically "what the- OH YEAH!"
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on July 10, 2017, 02:30:27 PM
Yeah, to me this one by far felt like the most vintage Twin Peaks so far. I think the show also spent the most time in the town of cool young dude Peaks this episode.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on July 10, 2017, 02:43:00 PM
Also I fucking love Bobby in the new season. He was kind of a twirp before and he's massively improved in the last 20 years. You could always tell he loved his parents in the first run, but I love that he's not such a douchenozzle anymore and is actually a stand-up guy. :)
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on July 10, 2017, 02:47:36 PM
smh, Bobby was always cool.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on July 10, 2017, 02:57:04 PM
smh, Bobby was always cool.

He was but he still had his dumb moments. Glad he's all growed up. :)
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on July 10, 2017, 03:02:28 PM
Also wtf was with that guy running into the wall? :lol
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on July 10, 2017, 03:17:35 PM
This post said it better than me, basically: http://neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=243088113&postcount=11126
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on July 10, 2017, 04:37:25 PM
Major Briggs was clearly set up to be a bigger character in a third season had it happened back then. I'm glad he's getting a lot of acknowledgement still.

If there was anything I worried about, it was how Lynch would incorporate long dead actors into the show as their characters were very meaningful to the show as a whole. I feel like he knocked it out of the park in that aspect.

One of the writers (I forget whether it was Frost or Lynch--I think it was just one of the general writers) said one of the ideas for the original S3 was to focus on Briggs trying to find/save Coop.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: archie4208 on July 16, 2017, 09:56:11 PM
Ripped Dougie.  :drool
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: ZephyrFate on July 16, 2017, 11:57:09 PM
i feel weird about the Dougie sex scene.  :-\
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on July 17, 2017, 12:00:26 AM
Dougie's face during the sex scene. :lol

This is the most "normal" episode yet and it was great! Richard (Dick) Horne is a fucking shitstain. :lol
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Bebpo on July 17, 2017, 12:10:16 AM
I hate this season.
Still in for the (boring) ride.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on July 17, 2017, 12:41:49 AM
I hate this season.
Still in for the (boring) ride.

Loooooolllllllll
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on July 17, 2017, 11:31:37 AM
I wonder if Coop jerked it in the Red Room? That might have been 25 years of pent up jizzum.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on July 17, 2017, 11:57:56 AM
FWWM is getting a Criterion release in October. :lawd
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on July 18, 2017, 03:48:20 PM
http://neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=243788526&postcount=12164

🤔

:lol
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on July 20, 2017, 12:07:30 PM
https://www.instagram.com/p/BWwc9w4hfJJ/

Relationship goals.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: toku on July 20, 2017, 04:18:04 PM
It probably is.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on July 21, 2017, 01:55:13 AM
Donna has a different legal name, so he wouldn't be a Richard Horne tho
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: pilonv1 on July 21, 2017, 03:30:56 AM
Is it some meta commentary on modern TV that all the new in TP characters are utterly unrepentant sacks of shit outside of one who was retconned to have always been around and another who is the daughter of a liked character doing the same thing her mom did 25 years ago?

I'm assuming the first one is Frank but I can't for the life of me work out who the daughter is :(

edit: forgot it was Shelley's daughter
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on July 21, 2017, 04:10:58 AM
Meh, Leo > Methcaulay Culkin.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on July 21, 2017, 07:05:45 PM
I get sad when I see people shit on Leo. Yeah, aside from James, his character was shit on the most in S2, but I found him legit scary in the first season, and a lot of that comes from the performance.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on July 22, 2017, 12:54:18 PM
And he had a cool car
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on July 22, 2017, 01:25:26 PM
Leo was scary in s1 and fucking HILARIOUS in s2 (until he came back, then he went full Friday 13th lol.)

(https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/f4/0a/ac/f40aac48b3d171c562f8aef7d7c798f5.jpg)

:rofl
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: VomKriege on July 22, 2017, 02:00:07 PM
James is the WOAT, no debate. Leo does all he was intended to do.

Oh god I agree with Vice.
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/d7ajkv/fuck-you-james-hurley-the-worst-thing-about-twin-peaks

That image tho  :lol
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: toku on July 22, 2017, 02:00:17 PM
how does young madchen amick look hot even out of frame, moving and holding shit in front of her face/body

 :noah
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: toku on July 23, 2017, 08:27:01 PM
https://twitter.com/MatthewLillard/status/889280016697241600
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: archie4208 on July 23, 2017, 10:09:36 PM
Best episode yet.

spoiler (click to show/hide)
He's dead :rofl
[close]
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on July 24, 2017, 01:42:20 AM
Bobby taking charge and being heroic. :heart
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on July 24, 2017, 08:30:35 AM
WE ARE LATE FOR DINNER, IT'S ALREADY PAST 6:30, WHAT IS GOING ON?
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on July 24, 2017, 08:31:41 AM
WE ARE LATE FOR DINNER, IT'S ALREADY PAST 6:30, WHAT IS GOING ON?

This is probably going to end up one of my all time fave Lynch scenes. It's a classic for sure.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on July 24, 2017, 11:06:39 AM
Is it me or did this episode feel like a send off to Dougie Jones?

Nope. Better to just embrace the Dougie, he ain't going nowhere.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on July 24, 2017, 01:19:37 PM
Is it me or did this episode feel like a send off to Dougie Jones?

Nope. Better to just embrace the Dougie, he ain't going nowhere.

Haha, I was going to say, we ain't getting off that easy. I've made my peace with Dougie, even though I'm [SCREAMING INTERNALLY] ever time he shows up and telling myself "okay, he eats the cherry pie, is this gonna be what turns him back into real Cooper?".
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on July 24, 2017, 01:40:31 PM
Lynch is probably cracking up reading about everyone's frustration with Dougie/Coop.  :lol

spoiler (click to show/hide)
:-\
[close]
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on July 24, 2017, 01:52:42 PM
Lynch's therapist told him to not read online comments, so he doesn't. That said, I'd say it's likely he anticipated some of the current feeling about Dougie.

I don't mind Dougie. It was clear going in this would be something very, very different. I do hope we get Cooper back, but if it's not until the last episode I'm fine with that. More than anything it shows the Black Lodge is not to be fucked with. You can get out, yeah, but only after wasting 25 years inside and losing your mind once you finally get back.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on July 24, 2017, 02:03:11 PM
I think it also goes to show that the black lodge is not unequivocally evil. Mike seems like a morally gray character. He feeda on garmonbozia, but is actively helping Coop, keeping him out of trouble. I think what's happening is that Dopplecoop/Bob/The Experiment and whatever other forces are at play are threatening to destroy the natural order or balance of things and certain Lodge spirits are fighting to prevent that.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: archie4208 on July 24, 2017, 02:08:16 PM
I'd rather have Dougie and evil Coop's wacky adventures over a 25 year old nostalgia circlejerk.

spoiler (click to show/hide)
I got Nintendo games for that.  :doge
[close]
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on July 24, 2017, 02:12:19 PM
Mike is the only good one, and that's cause he renounced his old ways. However by the nature of his being he still needs garmonbozia to survive. So he's got some internal guilt and conflict there. I would feel confident saying all Lodge spirits are evil, or at the very least, mischievous and completely self-centered (outside Mike, as noted.)

The White Lodge, if that's what the purple zone/Giant's home is, is definitely the opposite. Black and white, grandiose, calm, dialogue-less.

I think Mike and the White Lodge spirits are helping Coop, but in different ways, and may even be ignorant of each other.

Where the Arm fits into all this, I can't say. At the surface, it *should* be pure evil, since it represents the evil part of Mike that he had to separate from to "atone." But Mike and the Arm seemed to have been working together at the start of The Return, so it's difficult to say. It definitely did seem like the Arm got pissed at Coop about something ("NONEXISTENCE!") before Coop got ejected.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on July 24, 2017, 02:20:34 PM
That was the arm's doppleganger.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on July 24, 2017, 02:45:48 PM
That was the arm's doppleganger.

Where do you get that from?

Mike said the Tree is the Arm's evolution.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on July 24, 2017, 02:55:02 PM
That was the arm's doppleganger.

Where do you get that from?

Mike said the Tree is the Arm's evolution.

Can't post evidence atm, but the arm and the evil arm have different hues. Iirc, the doppleganger arm has a yellowish tint. It's been documented on the Twin Peaks reddit,  if you google it I'm sure something will come up.

Edit: when I say arm, I mean tree. The tree itself has a doppleganger tree.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on July 24, 2017, 03:04:05 PM
Best scene ever. It's all worth it just for this.

https://youtu.be/n_1Jxd95o7Y
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on July 24, 2017, 03:23:12 PM
That was the arm's doppleganger.

Where do you get that from?

Mike said the Tree is the Arm's evolution.

Can't post evidence atm, but the arm and the evil arm have different hues. Iirc, the doppleganger arm has a yellowish tint. It's been documented on the Twin Peaks reddit,  if you google it I'm sure something will come up.

Edit: when I say arm, I mean tree. The tree itself has a doppleganger tree.

Not sure I buy it.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on July 24, 2017, 03:31:35 PM
Well you better buy it because the Evolution references its doppleganger before it makes its first appearance (nonexistence), rewatch that episode. As they walk towards the white statue, Mike says "something is wrong," and the tree says "my doppleganger"
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on July 24, 2017, 03:57:08 PM
Will rewatch.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on July 24, 2017, 04:41:42 PM
Will rewatch.


I didn't catch it at first either, but there's a distinct tonal shift when the Tree's doppleganger appears. He literally pops out of the statue.

In the S2 finale LMFAP also has a doppleganger with glazed eyes, so there's precedent for this.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TakingBackSunday on July 24, 2017, 04:51:27 PM
Best scene ever. It's all worth it just for this.

https://youtu.be/n_1Jxd95o7Y

As someone who hasn't started this season yet

wut
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: toku on July 24, 2017, 05:12:40 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/uFXYvd9.gif)
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on July 24, 2017, 05:28:32 PM
Best scene ever. It's all worth it just for this.

https://youtu.be/n_1Jxd95o7Y

As someone who hasn't started this season yet

wut

This is one of the more normal scenes in the new season.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on July 24, 2017, 05:49:40 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/uFXYvd9.gif)

(http://i.imgur.com/MZz6TGR.gif)
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on July 24, 2017, 06:59:49 PM
As someone who hasn't started this season yet

wut

"WHY IS THIS HAPPENING?! WE'VE GOT MILES TO GO, WE HAVE TO GET HOME!"
~Agent Cooper fans
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on July 24, 2017, 08:57:16 PM
Really, if I could find a woman like the screaming car lady, I'd marry her on the spot. That's the kind of woman I'd need to keep me in line and live my best possible life.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on July 24, 2017, 09:00:03 PM
Imagine if Jughead was just screaming at you.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on July 25, 2017, 12:54:06 PM
I dare say Major Briggs would have been proud of the way his son turned outm  :usacry
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on July 25, 2017, 01:16:32 PM
Has everyone seen the Twin Peaks-inspired Psych episode? I never liked Psych but it's a pretty fun episode with a couple of the TP people guesting, like Sherilyn Fenn, Dana Ashbrook, Sheryl Lee, and Ray Wise.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual_Spires
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on July 25, 2017, 09:28:44 PM
I'm glad the teacher isn't dead.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on July 25, 2017, 09:37:30 PM
I'm glad the teacher isn't dead.

Hopefully Chad gets what's coming to him in the next episode or two. Richard will probably stick around until the finale or thereabouts.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on July 31, 2017, 01:28:49 AM
Sudden Audrey is sudden.

Gotta love Lynch just taking the wind out of everything. :lol
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: chronovore on July 31, 2017, 02:13:46 AM
how does young madchen amick look hot even out of frame, moving and holding shit in front of her face/body

 :noah

She's still amazing. She was in My Own Worst Enemy a couple years back, and looked like she'd barely aged.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on July 31, 2017, 02:48:52 AM
Man, this episode sucked ASS! No Dooper, barely any Dougie, and it all just felt so uneventful. Wild Audrey appears and somehow she's also married to another cripple that Lynch seems to fetishize. And the French lady leaving Cole's room was torture. Literally taking forever.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on July 31, 2017, 07:37:58 AM
Weakest ep, but Grace Zabriskie was awesome. More Grace plz.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on July 31, 2017, 09:36:21 AM
Sarah Palmer this ep:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vdb_C6Rg3Lk&t=142s (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vdb_C6Rg3Lk&t=142s)
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on August 01, 2017, 10:06:14 AM
There's theories going around that either Audrey is still in a coma or trapped in a lodgr or some other type of purgatory dimmension. The entire sequence is very dream-like. It has the feel of a typical dream where you are trying to go somewhere but are stuck in one place and things are preventing you from getting to where you need to be. Also, when Charlie says "you know I don't have a crystal ball, Audrey," an object on his table that can be seen that looks very much like a crystal ball.

Also, it might be a dream because they are stuck in time. Charlie is doing paperwork, but doesn't have a computer. They don't have cell phones. Charlie uses a rotary phone (which is extra weird, it would be way out dated even in 1989). Then again, Lucy still uses landline phones.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on August 06, 2017, 12:00:37 PM
Hopefully this episode is a bit better than the last. After the amazing part 11, part 12 felt like nothing major happened. Need more Mr. C and Dougiecoop. I am cautiously hyped for tonight.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Phoenix Dark on August 06, 2017, 01:16:58 PM
u guys still pretending this shit is good and not a muddled disaster most fans don't like huh  :doge

the goat show huh, yet even diehards admit they only like 1 full season (S1).  :doge

carry on  :doge
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: toku on August 06, 2017, 01:26:19 PM
u guys still pretending this shit is good and not a muddled disaster most fans don't like huh  :doge

the goat show huh, yet even diehards admit they only like 1 full season (S1).  :doge

carry on  :doge

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tc74zZmn2m8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yx9GnKwC8Ew
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on August 06, 2017, 01:48:25 PM
u guys still pretending this shit is good and not a muddled disaster most fans don't like huh  :doge

the goat show huh, yet even diehards admit they only like 1 full season (S1).  :doge

carry on  :doge

This season is unfiltered Lynch through and through. If you like Lynch, this season has been ambrosia from the gods. Gods who had abandoned us for over ten years and possibly forever.

This season is for those of us who enjoyed Inland Empire.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on August 06, 2017, 02:04:49 PM
I'm not a Lynch fan and I like this season a lot.  :yeshrug
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on August 06, 2017, 02:13:30 PM
mrw I see a PD post

(http://i.imgur.com/4qfbzqm.gif)
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on August 06, 2017, 02:16:09 PM
mrw I see a PD post

(http://i.imgur.com/4qfbzqm.gif)

Mine:

(https://media.giphy.com/media/VszoONpBpxAAg/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on August 06, 2017, 09:01:24 PM
This ep. :rejoice
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: archie4208 on August 06, 2017, 09:18:14 PM
JAMES PLAYING JUST YOU

I MARKED OUT SO HARD
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on August 07, 2017, 01:01:38 AM
This episode is AWESOME.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on August 07, 2017, 01:41:44 AM
I'm upgrading this to BEST EPISODE EVER after seeing that roadhouse scene. Lynch's fuckery is amazing.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on August 07, 2017, 01:59:18 AM
LMAO at the fake dummy head when Dopplecoop punches him.  :lol
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: naff on August 07, 2017, 02:44:00 AM
u guys still pretending this shit is good and not a muddled disaster most fans don't like huh  :doge

the goat show huh, yet even diehards admit they only like 1 full season (S1).  :doge

carry on  :doge

"diehards" aka the vocal twee cunts who shat up my fb/twitter feed with crappy twin peaks memes for months leading up to this, then promptly couldnt handle it when it Lynch did what he does. s3 is mulholland drive level Lynch. gtfoh.

that's my anecdotal experience of the haters at least. people i know that actually like Lynch's body of work love it.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on August 07, 2017, 10:47:03 AM
Idk, I can't be hard on people who were Twins Peaks and not David Lynch fans being upset they're getting David Lynch with a sprinkling of Twin Peaks for 18 hours. I think even the people who were expecting and looking forward to 18 hours of unrestrained Lynch weren't expecting this show to go the way it has, even if they love it. Get super hyped watching seasons 1 and 2 on Netflix and this see the revival that more often than not could be an entirely new show unrelated to TP is still kind of a tough pill to swallow 13 hours into it.

A die hard Twin Peaks fan and a die hard David Lynch fan are not the same thing. Trying to fangate Twin Peaks, a network prime time soap drama from the late 80s/early 90s behind stuff like MD, Lost Highway, or Eraserhead is pretty weird.

I went into this with few expectations. The only thing I 100% knew was that it wouldn't be much like the original show since Lynch has trended weirder and weirder ever since the show, and his last major project was probably too weird. I by far don't think the man is infallible, and as I said, his last movie wasn't my cup of tea, so I was slightly prepared to not like this (although I prayed I would). Luckily, things have turned out pretty well so far. It's not perfect, but it's been mostly great.

The thing is. . .to go back to my Mister Robot S2 comments from the other day: S2 of Mr. Robot was weird that in although I liked all the individual episodes, I overall didn't like the season because it felt that it didn't deliver on a satisfying ending. Twin Peaks S3 faces a similar problem. All of this weirdness is wonderful as I'm consuming it, but unless it sticks the landing, I'll probably end up being at least as (probably more) disappointed than I was with Mr. Robot S2.

If it -does- stick the landing and end really well, I'm looking forward to fan edits that can maybe trim a bit of the fat. At least get rid of the superfluous (read: non-James) roadhouse scenes. The only problem is that I typically love the long shots over the final credits, and those are probably prime "fat."
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on August 07, 2017, 11:17:39 AM
I don't want anything cut out, I'd just like for it to be edited in a linear manner, because most of the show has such a fucked up time frame where even though it's clear each story point is on a different day/time frame, but the actual Twin Peaks storylines are clearly straight up jumbled up either intentionally or flat out editing errors.

Yeah, I'd like to believe they aren't editing errors, but at this point I don't know. There's that whole notion that the thing was written like an 18 hour movie, and sometimes I wonder if because of that, they shuffled around some scenes for time or to make sure there wasn't too much/too little of a particular character or the scene was the wrong tone for the ep or something. There's the whole "is this future or is this past" element, so I'm trying to give the show the benefit of a doubt on the scene order meaning something, but I don't know how much faith I have in this particular aspect. An 18 hour movie could maybe just be unwieldy to sequence in editing?
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on August 07, 2017, 11:21:06 AM
The best thing Twin Peaks related of all time was the eighth episode of The Return.

(http://68.media.tumblr.com/aa075f2c0112f65d3f08698e49c82315/tumblr_os5s5dZBl21rpotpgo2_400.gif)

"Gotta light?"
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on August 07, 2017, 11:21:54 AM
I agree with everything you said except the Super Nadine plot being crap. Super Nadine was awesome. Nadine is awesome. Nadine was always cool.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on August 07, 2017, 11:59:55 AM
Fuuuuuuuuu I just accidentally read a spoiler for 14 that was pretty big. Tempted to just read them all now.

It would be nice if someone managed to record the ep when it aired and leak it. The fact that it hasn't probably says something about the level of interest in the show.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on August 07, 2017, 12:14:39 PM
Yo I think some scenes are not in chronological order. All the stuff with Bobby, Shelly, Becky, Big Ed, Norma, happened before the stuff in part 11.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on August 07, 2017, 12:22:38 PM
Yo I think some scenes are not in chronological order. All the stuff with Bobby, Shelly, Becky, Big Ed, Norma, happened before the stuff in part 11.

The big timeline issue this ep was that Bobby says he found the Briggs stuff earlier that day, which isn't right since we know a night has passed (the whole bit with the screaming woman and vomiting child happened at night in 11 and some of the Twin Peaks scenes in 12 were in daylight).
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on August 07, 2017, 12:29:34 PM
I'll bet they're actually all dead and in purgatory.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on August 07, 2017, 01:40:03 PM
I'll bet they're actually all dead and in purgatory.

In the last episode, they all end up in a heavenly TM class and do that whole yogic flying thing together.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on August 07, 2017, 04:47:51 PM
These (potential) Ep 14 spoilers :thinking
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on August 07, 2017, 04:49:49 PM
These (potential) Ep 14 spoilers :thinking

I couldn't resist :( Ep sounds awesome.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on August 07, 2017, 06:59:41 PM
TVC, link to spoilers please
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: toku on August 07, 2017, 07:03:39 PM
man seeing big ed like that kinda hurt


(https://68.media.tumblr.com/8236ae5517c2908977bc170faff53cec/tumblr_otob282CGW1rwnbtco3_1280.png)


 :(
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on August 07, 2017, 07:42:01 PM
TVC, link to spoilers please

Read at your own risk:

http://reddit.com/r/twinpeaks/comments/6s4sqi/s3e14_german_sky_aired_the_wrong_episode_episode/
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on August 07, 2017, 10:14:15 PM
TVC, link to spoilers please

Read at your own risk:

http://reddit.com/r/twinpeaks/comments/6s4sqi/s3e14_german_sky_aired_the_wrong_episode_episode/

Damn, it looks like they purged the thread.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on August 08, 2017, 01:52:11 AM
TVC, link to spoilers please

Read at your own risk:

http://reddit.com/r/twinpeaks/comments/6s4sqi/s3e14_german_sky_aired_the_wrong_episode_episode/

Damn, it looks like they purged the thread.

In short, from what I remember. . .

spoiler (click to show/hide)
Gordon tells Tammy about the first blue rose case in the 70s.

Gordon has some weird dream/vision featuring Monica Bellucci in Paris. Philip Jeffries appears via FWWM/Missing Pieces footage.

Gordon, Albert, and Tammy find out about Dougie and Janet-E via something in Briggs' stomach and have Janey-E and Dougie arrested. They are apparently headed to Vegas to investigate. At some point Diane reveals that Janey-Y is her estranged half sister (!!!).

The Jack Rabbit's Place stuff goes down. IIRC, Andy gets sucked into a portal similar to the one Gordon almost got sucked into and meets The Giant, who tells Andy things about Bob and the two Coops. Andy gets to leave but the spoiler poster was unsure of if he understood anything he was told. They also find the blind girl from the pink room in the woods and take her into custody.

There was also some weird stuff about Sarah Palmer in a bar or something getting hit on and doing something weird. I want to say "opening her face" or something, but the dude's sentence was in especially weird english[/quote]
[close]
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on August 08, 2017, 01:55:41 AM
Holy cow! Sounds like Part 14 is a hell of an episode!
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on August 08, 2017, 01:57:22 AM
Holy cow! Sounds like Part 14 is a hell of an episode!

It's weird how few places have carried the spoilers. Sky admitted publicly they aired the episode, but it seems very few people actually saw it.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on August 08, 2017, 02:02:30 AM
Holy cow! Sounds like Part 14 is a hell of an episode!

It's weird how few places have carried the spoilers. Sky admitted publicly they aired the episode, but it seems very few people actually saw it.

I know. It's kind of amazing how the leak's been contained. I read something about very few people watching the show in Germany plus local laws being very tough on torrenting is the reason. Still, pretty shocking that in this day and age there isn't a bootleg of the episode somewhere.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: fistfulofmetal on August 09, 2017, 10:06:03 AM
Big Ed  :(

at least he's stylin' with that hair
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: archie4208 on August 13, 2017, 09:06:12 PM
What the FUCK is Sarah's problem?
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on August 13, 2017, 11:13:19 PM
What the FUCK is Sarah's problem?

She's Bob.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on August 14, 2017, 01:41:39 AM
I don't think she's Bob. Bob is with Evil Coop. She is Frogmoth.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on August 14, 2017, 01:42:40 AM
Naido = Blind woman from the purple place = Judy = monkey from FWWM
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on August 14, 2017, 01:52:18 AM
Naido = Blind woman from the purple place = Judy = monkey from FWWM

Logic:

Naido is making monkey sounds. The monkey in FWWM said "Judy." Judy was supposed to be Josie Packard's twin sister in one of the drafts. The actresses playing Josie and Naido are both Asian. I dunno.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: pilonv1 on August 14, 2017, 08:19:34 AM
What the FUCK is Sarah's problem?

She's Bob.

Or the Mother
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on August 14, 2017, 11:36:14 AM
"I'll eat you."


 :holeup :leon :badass :ufup :whoo :bolo :mouf :crazy

I feel like that whole scene is going to stick with me for the rest of my life. The face Sarah Palmer makes before she opens up her head and then the creepy ass smile inside the void... Nightmare fuel.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on August 14, 2017, 11:48:30 AM
Evil Grace Zabriskie is the kind of woman I'd need to marry to make me grow up.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Dennis on August 14, 2017, 12:57:38 PM
Great episode. Will probably stick with me like episode 8.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: toku on August 14, 2017, 01:25:19 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ze5IBEMoUR0
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Dennis on August 14, 2017, 01:46:33 PM
Audrey is in a bad place.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on August 14, 2017, 02:04:48 PM
Is the bleeding guy in the jail cell Billy?
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on August 14, 2017, 02:19:17 PM
Is the bleeding guy in the jail cell Billy?

Oh shit, maybe.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: pilonv1 on August 14, 2017, 10:03:17 PM
Is the bleeding guy in the jail cell Billy?

Seems to be but that's almost too straight forward for this show
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Momo on August 14, 2017, 11:06:27 PM
wtf did i just watch  :brazilcry
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on August 21, 2017, 01:22:00 AM
Best episode since ep8. The Big Ed scenes felt pretty much exactly like the OG show, and the Mr. C scenes felt pretty close to FWWM.

I remember speculation about why Philip Jeffries was dubbed last episode and I guess now we know why.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on August 21, 2017, 01:23:27 AM
Naido = Blind woman from the purple place = Judy = monkey from FWWM

Logic:

Naido is making monkey sounds. The monkey in FWWM said "Judy." Judy was supposed to be Josie Packard's twin sister in one of the drafts. The actresses playing Josie and Naido are both Asian. I dunno.

Seems like Judy = Naido = Josie? Since Cooper's "met Judy" before. Or maybe it's just the twin sister.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on August 21, 2017, 02:33:18 AM
Holy shit, the Audrey scenes are so fucking cray cray. She is never leaving that house.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on August 21, 2017, 02:35:08 AM
Naido = Blind woman from the purple place = Judy = monkey from FWWM

Logic:

Naido is making monkey sounds. The monkey in FWWM said "Judy." Judy was supposed to be Josie Packard's twin sister in one of the drafts. The actresses playing Josie and Naido are both Asian. I dunno.

Seems like Judy = Naido = Josie? Since Cooper's "met Judy" before. Or maybe it's just the twin sister.

Was the Cooper in the FWWM scene with Jeffries actually the Doppel and not the real Coop? After all, there was that weird thing with the security camera, which definitely points to the Doppel.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on August 21, 2017, 02:38:26 AM
It's unfortunate that David Bowie passed away and couldn't be in the show and Michael J. Anderson became a crazy asshole and couldn't be in the show. As great as it is, imagine how much better it would be if MFAP didn't have to be a tree and Jeffries wasn't a fog machine.  :-\
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on August 21, 2017, 02:46:35 AM
Holy fuck, I just read a theory that is blowing my mind right now. The person that was calling Doppelcoop pretending to be Jeffries was none other than Mike/Philip Gerard. He said he wants to be with Bob again. Mike and Bob were once partners!
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: archie4208 on August 21, 2017, 07:13:01 AM
One Punch Man is my favorite character.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on August 21, 2017, 11:02:25 AM
It's unfortunate that David Bowie passed away and couldn't be in the show and Michael J. Anderson became a crazy asshole and couldn't be in the show. As great as it is, imagine how much better it would be if MFAP didn't have to be a tree and Jeffries wasn't a fog machine.  :-\

What happened to Anderson?
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on August 21, 2017, 11:03:16 AM
Also why did James get arrested lol, he was getting the shit beat out of him the entire "fight."
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on August 21, 2017, 11:15:15 AM
It's unfortunate that David Bowie passed away and couldn't be in the show and Michael J. Anderson became a crazy asshole and couldn't be in the show. As great as it is, imagine how much better it would be if MFAP didn't have to be a tree and Jeffries wasn't a fog machine.  :-\


Now, is he a fog machine, or a tea kettle?

Dalek.

It's unfortunate that David Bowie passed away and couldn't be in the show and Michael J. Anderson became a crazy asshole and couldn't be in the show. As great as it is, imagine how much better it would be if MFAP didn't have to be a tree and Jeffries wasn't a fog machine.  :-\

What happened to Anderson?

Sorry for the Perez link, but it was the first I could find.

http://perezhilton.com/2016-08-10-twin-peaks-david-lynch-pedophilia-murder-accusations-michael-anderson/?from=post#.WZr43iiGO9I

He's also made a lot of generally antisemitic comments and other sorts of things that are, you know, kind of commonplace nowadays.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on August 21, 2017, 11:22:42 AM
Hmm that was last August though, presumably when they were done/almost done filming?

Edit- Ah.

Quote
In the past, Anderson has been publicly frustrated by not being cast in the Twin Peaks reboot, reportedly over salary disagreements — but based on this post, the 62-year-old is clearly trying to drag Lynch's reputation down with him.

So it was more of a money thing. In any case, good riddance?
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on August 21, 2017, 11:26:25 AM
Still better than Kevin J. Anderson.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on August 21, 2017, 11:38:47 AM
Ummm

The Jumping Man has Sarah Palmer's face.

http://imgur.com/a/AoxKx
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on August 21, 2017, 12:13:25 PM
What are you smoking, it looks EXACTLY like Sarah Palmer.


(http://i.imgur.com/4WliKS7.png)
(https://welcometotwinpeaks.com/wp-content/uploads/sarah-palmer-watching-documentary.jpg)
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on August 21, 2017, 12:29:28 PM
?

I posted a link to an imgur page that has 4 screen caps. I then simply posted one of the 4 images directly here.

edit: I see, you only looked at the first image. Much too hasty you are.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: toku on August 21, 2017, 02:00:31 PM
big ed and norma


 :itagaki
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on August 21, 2017, 03:37:35 PM
Man, I wanted to hug the Log Lady during her last scene :(
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Bebpo on August 22, 2017, 04:48:06 AM
Caught up on the last 4 eps last night. Man, this show  :maf Sometimes I really love it and think it's the best TV and need the next ep. Sometimes I'm totally bored and on my phone. I usually have the opposite reaction to eps as the fanbase. Like I enjoyed last weeks ep a lot, but this weeks ep was kinda meh for me. The whole out of timing story with the younger kids/roadhouse scenes, while it might be artsy and have a payoff for telling it that way, it's also made all of the scenes incredibly un-engaging for me. The stuff with Shelly's daughter reminds me of the terrible Nadine subplots of S2 where I just want to get back to the good subplots. The last 5-10 mins of every ep is rough to get through usually. Otoh, Dougie has grown on me at this point and the goofyness of his stuff with the casino bosses reminds me of the Ben & Jerry goofy feel of the original which is a positive. Evil Coop's subplot is fairly engaging as is Hawk & Crew. Everything else is pretty whatever to me.

Probably won't know if I like the show until it's over.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on August 22, 2017, 09:55:38 AM
The more I think about it, the more the Jeffries teapot thing bothers me. Why is he a tea kettle? I wish Lynch would just recast the character. The evolution of the arm kind of sort of works. Bleh.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on August 22, 2017, 10:32:20 AM
The more I think about it, the more the Jeffries teapot thing bothers me. Why is he a tea kettle? I wish Lynch would just recast the character. The evolution of the arm kind of sort of works. Bleh.

Eh. I like it. I'd rather they get weird than recast, especially if it's just for a scene or two.  Striking visual, too.

(https://vignette4.wikia.nocookie.net/twinpeaks/images/5/59/Phillip_Jeffries_%282010s%29.jpg)
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on August 22, 2017, 10:35:09 AM
If would have been cool if the far-fetched fan theory were true that David Lynch had stealthily filmed some scenes with Bowie before his death.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on August 22, 2017, 10:37:34 AM
If would have been cool if the far-fetched fan theory were true that David Lynch had stealthily filmed some scenes with Bowie before his death.

I'm half convinced that when Lynch asked Bowie to come back, Bowie just told him "I'm not doing that ridiculous fucking voice again"
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on August 22, 2017, 10:41:58 AM
As good at being secretive as Lynch is, I don't think he'd be able to keep Bowie's involvement under wraps. That's why I never believed those rumors.

It's not that I have a problem with the kettle itself, it just gives it a retconny feel. So does Frank Truman. The convoluted sheriff brothers angle seems unnecessary. If Michael Ontkean didn't want to come back and they just recast Sheriff Truman I'd actually have an easier time suspending my disbelief. Now we get another Sheriff Truman, who conveniently was never referenced before, with constant references the off screen original Sheriff Truman who is stricken with a mysterious illness.  ???
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on August 22, 2017, 10:50:26 AM
As good at being secretive as Lynch is, I don't think he'd be able to keep Bowie's involvement under wraps. That's why I never believed those rumors.

It's not that I have a problem with the kettle itself, it just gives it a retconny feel. So does Frank Truman. The convoluted sheriff brothers angle seems unnecessary. If Michael Ontkean didn't want to come back and they just recast Sheriff Truman I'd actually have an easier time suspending my disbelief. Now we get another Sheriff Truman, who conveniently was never referenced before, with constant references the off screen original Sheriff Truman who is stricken with a mysterious illness.  ???

The Harry Truman things bugs me more because they keep bringing up Harry and I'm pretty sure he isn't going to turn up at all. That's like picking at a scab. I knew they'd do something with Jeffries because he's just been too important to the main narrative, but I think the Harry teasing is just a mean tease.

I'm also wondering if we'll ever get follow-up on the humming in the Great Western. Or whatever the fuck is going on with Jerry.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on August 22, 2017, 11:03:55 AM
I wonder though, was Jeffries really important to the narrative, I mean, when the character was originally conceived in FWWM? Do you think Lynch had some grand master plan for Twin Peaks? Because as far as I recall, they made up the first season as they went along. I wrote the Jeffries scene off in FWWM as just one of those idiosyncratic Lynch moments.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on August 22, 2017, 11:11:09 AM
I wonder though, was Jeffries really important to the narrative, I mean, when the character was originally conceived in FWWM? Do you think Lynch had some grand master plan for Twin Peaks? Because as far as I recall, they made up the first season as they went along. I wrote the Jeffries scene off in FWWM as just one of those idiosyncratic Lynch moments.

They were winging it. From the screenwriter, Bob Engel:

Quote
Going back to some of the other Missing Pieces, one of my favorite parts was the David Bowie/Phillip Jeffries full and extended sequence. It was revealed that Jeffries was looking for Judy at the Buenos Aires hotel, and that he may have discovered the ring at her home in Washington, which led to him witnessing the meeting between the Black Lodge inhabitants. Then of course he gets transported back, and the guy is yelling about his asshole or something at the hotel (laughs).

(Sarcastically) Uh huh.

But there was a lot of stuff revealed, even though it was still mysterious. Who was Judy, and was it ever actually planned that she might be Josie’s sister? What was the whole deal with that scene?

That’s a good question, I don’t quite remember. (Brett laughs) Judy is my wife’s sister’s name, that’s where that came from, I think. Now that I think about it, there might have been more shot [of the Buenos Aires scene]. That was to connect everybody, I think Windom Earle was down there, that was the plan, and that David Bowie was on the hunt for him. We weren’t trying to tie things up neatly, but I think those were meant to be the end of things. But Josie is in Buenos Aires as far as [I can remember], as is Windom Earle. At some point there must have been some planning on how we were going to shoot more of Buenos Aires, and bring him back. But I don’t think we ever got that far, but there was a reason to bring in another agent. (Laughs) But boy you got me, you got me. It was pretty cool to see that stuff though, I remember that.

https://web.archive.org/web/20141110062246/http://www.alternativenation.net/exclusive-bob-engels-talks-possibility-of-twin-peaks-revival-story-behind-david-bowies-character-more/

But in the intervening years, fans have really attached to the whole "Judy" thing as one of those big WTF moments, so I guess Lynch wanted to build on that, maybe? Also, you don't get much cooler than David Bowie.

See also: http://abovethestore.blogspot.com/2009/04/judy-judy-judy.html (Don't have the time to read the whole thing because meeting in 15 min, but the first few paragraphs sound familiar.)
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on August 22, 2017, 11:15:17 AM
I just think that maybe if they couldn't get Bowie to film, it would be better to just write the character out of the show. I mean, is he really necessary to the plot of TP:R? Could the story of Cooper coming back, Dougie, Doppelcoop, The Experiment, the Woodsmen, Blue Rose, etc. exist without Jeffries? I think so.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on August 22, 2017, 11:17:12 AM
I just think that maybe if they couldn't get Bowie to film, it would be better to just write the character out of the show. I mean, is he really necessary to the plot of TP:R? Could the story of Cooper coming back, Dougie, Doppelcoop, The Experiment, the Woodsmen, Blue Rose, etc. exist without Jeffries? I think so.

True. They could have replaced him with Chester Desmond (although I'm not sure he had an established relationship with Coop, off hand). It's a sin he hasn't been mentioned at all. Maybe the season was too far into production by the time they realized Bowie wouldn't work? We'll likely never know since Lynch and Frost are so tight-lipped.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on August 22, 2017, 11:19:06 AM
Actually, it's really conspicuous Desmond hasn't been mentioned since he knew what "Blue Rose" cases were, implying he was on the task force with Cole, Cooper, and Jeffries. Chris Isaac must have pissed Lynch off Lara Flynn Boyle style.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on August 22, 2017, 11:21:43 AM
I would love to get at least a brief cameo of Chet Desmond. Maybe see him in the Red Room or something? I know he was basically a pseudo-Cooper because Kyle McLaughlan didn't want to be in the movie, but he was a cool character and I feel we didn't get a proper resolution to his story. Yeah, like, he's trapped in the lodge too, but he doesn't get his 25 year parole, fuck Chet.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on August 22, 2017, 11:24:35 AM
I liked him as a character, too, although I guess he was just a more suave Cooper stand-in. They could've brought Kiefer back in, too. Probably would've made for better content than some of the material we've gotten.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on August 22, 2017, 11:26:43 AM
Also, there's another reason Jeffries may have been made prominent that shouldn't be overlooked: Bowie's death. Maybe it's cynical, but maybe his death cemented that he had to be an important part of the season because Lynch/Frost knew Bowie would be on folks' minds so soon after his death. Now, I think Bowie passed away about halfway into filming, so this isn't super duper likely, but I guess it's something to kinda keep in mind.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on August 22, 2017, 11:28:45 AM
I liked him as a character, too, although I guess he was just a more suave Cooper stand-in. They could've brought Kiefer back in, too. Probably would've made for better content than some of the material we've gotten.

It's odd that they mentioned Chet as one of the Blue Rose agents, but not Sam. Sam was literally on the case with him. Sam was the bizarro Albert to Chet's bizarro Coop.

I'm just so glad that Miguel Ferrer was able to do his scenes before his death. Albert has been phenomenal this season. And Catherine Coulson's scenes are heartbreaking.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on August 22, 2017, 11:31:40 AM
Oh, did they mention Chet? I thought they just said Coop, Jeffries, and Cole.

Maybe Sam wasn't officially in yet. Maybe Teresa was his tryout, a la Tammy up until the middle of this season? It's mentioned in the Secret history that (iirc) he quit the FBI and started drinking after the Chet incident, so he probably didn't make the cut.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on August 22, 2017, 11:33:50 AM
I think they mentioned Chet, but I'm not positive. Need to re-watch.

I haven't read Secret History, so that's an interesting tidbit.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on August 22, 2017, 11:42:04 AM

I haven't read Secret History, so that's an interesting tidbit.

There's a lot of interesting stuff in it, but the events of the show have pretty much shown it to be "non-canonical" (I have a feeling David Lynch would lol talking about TP canon). For old characters that don't appear in the new series, I guess it's basically canonical since we'll likely never hear from them again.

The other old tie-in books, The Secret Diary of Laura Palmer and The Autobiography of Dale Cooper, are also pretty good (but very non-canonical) if you need a shot of TPness. The former is better than the latter. The Cooper book slides pretty well into canon, except it has him investigating Teresa Banks (as was originally intended at the time). It ends before TP and mostly covers his younger life.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on August 22, 2017, 11:53:32 AM
I actually did read The Secret Diaries of Laura Palmer a few years ago, it was very disturbing.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on August 22, 2017, 11:57:53 AM
Well, I recommend the Secret History, too. It's a very nicely put together book physically and well done in general. Maybe it will be available for cheap soon since the Final Dossier is coming out in October.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on August 22, 2017, 02:00:42 PM
Can't believe I'm seeing so many haters and non-believers. Everything this season is happening exactly as it should.

Outside the Sheriff Truman stuff obvsly lol.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on August 22, 2017, 04:04:59 PM
Note: Donna died on the back to her home planet
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on August 22, 2017, 06:00:26 PM
Alright, TP comment of the day (from AV Club):

"Something I didn't notice until after the episode: Mark Frost as the guy walking the dog in the woods."

Reply: "And until I saw the credits, I didn't know the dog was Lara Flynn Boyle"
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on August 22, 2017, 09:38:43 PM
VERY interesting thread on Reddit

https://www.reddit.com/r/twinpeaks/comments/6vcxh7/s3e15_gordon_cole_conundrum/
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: chronovore on August 22, 2017, 09:55:07 PM
Actually, it's really conspicuous Desmond hasn't been mentioned since he knew what "Blue Rose" cases were, implying he was on the task force with Cole, Cooper, and Jeffries. Chris Isaac must have pissed Lynch off Lara Flynn Boyle style.

Chris Isaac is usually reported as a really swell guy though. A stand-up fellow.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on August 22, 2017, 10:06:43 PM
I read it completely opposite as that poster, that Gordon Cole woke Cooper up and he tried to travel through electricity to get back to him. Not that still basically distinguished mentally-challenged Dougie Coop suddenly could comprehend a 37 bullet point of why he actually hates Gordon.

The bullet points are reasons/clues from the show why the poster thinks Cole is evil. Some of the points are hard to argue against. For example, Cole does have the picture of the nuclear explosion hanging in his office. As well as paintings of corn.

Also, the poster specifically stated that when Cole's name was mentioned he regained more of a Cooper-like awareness and demeanor, and I agree with him.

I'm not saying I'm 100% sold on the theory, but there could be something to it.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on August 23, 2017, 12:43:27 AM
Yeah that reddit post makes no sense lol.

Quote
Diane obviously prefers even evil Cooper to Cole (F... you, Gordon!).

Uh no, she's fucking terrified of Mr C lol.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on August 23, 2017, 12:46:20 AM
Not to keep bringing up Secret History, but I'm pretty sure it also hints that Cole knows a lot more than he's let on in regard to supernatural stuff, I believe even predating the original Blue Rose case.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on August 23, 2017, 03:52:37 AM
Is that why she keeps texting him?


You cherry picked the parts that are a stretch, but didn't address any parts that show Cole acting suspect. Yeah, the guy is looking at patterns, but a lot of these patterns are there for a purpose and many theories panned out before that were based on looking at patterns.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on August 23, 2017, 10:52:20 AM
Speaking outside the fourth wall for a second, I'm also not sure Lynch would make his surrogate the bad guy in all this. If anything it would be Frost... WAIT, he was in the last episode! I'm just realizing how much evidence there is that he's the big bad of the series:

- Frost had a dog in the last episode, dogs are well known to be way shittier than cats.
- Frost didn't stop a guy from killing himself, that's like super terrible and stuff.
- He looked like a redneck. Rednecks are bad.
- He had no lines - what kind of sinister voice is he hiding??

Connect the dots people!!
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on August 23, 2017, 04:26:58 PM
Oh weird, the deputy director of the FBI isn't always 100% on the up and up? That never happens. :doge


Yes, Secret History does make it pretty obvious Gordon knows more/is more interested in occult/supernatural/alien stuff than the shows have shown, but at no point does it make him out to be a dude trying to send his agents into bad situations in hopes of...something?

There's one specific footnote where Tammy says she finds something he did disturbing. I believe it was in regard to his hand in the listening post.

Cole is the Big Bad. Book it.

Edit: Just looked it up. Without going into lengthy backstory, commenting on a conversation from the early 70s, TP is "troubled" (not disturbed) by Cole's involvement in past (though unspecified) UFO conspiracy stuff for the gov't.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on August 23, 2017, 05:26:56 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ZJ__doruW4

:leon
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on August 23, 2017, 10:03:30 PM
No theory, just something neat. Relax breh.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on August 23, 2017, 10:15:13 PM
Relax, breh.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NTkuFT7ms3k
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on August 23, 2017, 10:41:42 PM
Are you drunk??
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: chronovore on August 24, 2017, 05:42:32 AM
Are you drunk??

I'm going to assume that his use of a professional wrestler gif just means he's really committed to this work, and not breaking kayfabe.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on August 24, 2017, 10:57:56 AM
Are you drunk??

Going booze free for a while  :shaq2

:six:
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on August 24, 2017, 11:04:33 AM
Free booze :whew

Booze free :six:
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: archie4208 on August 27, 2017, 10:02:40 PM
EVERYTHING happened.  :lawd
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on August 27, 2017, 11:48:17 PM
This episode was amazing. One of the best TP eps ever. They've really been killing it lately.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on August 28, 2017, 12:00:12 AM
For real: put Audrey on the Iron Throne.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on August 28, 2017, 01:43:19 AM
I watched this ep twice already. And the ending like 4 times.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on August 28, 2017, 01:47:36 AM
Best TP episode ever, biatches!

Bye Dougie.  :'(

Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on August 28, 2017, 01:54:40 AM
Who is the dreamer?
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Bebpo on August 28, 2017, 04:59:35 AM
That was damn good

Second best part was the suburbian shootout. That scene was hilarious and amazing.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on August 28, 2017, 11:19:46 AM
The shootout with Chantel and Hutch was very Tarantino-like.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on August 28, 2017, 11:34:47 AM
It reminded me of the Mulholland Drive hitman flopza scene in its randomness.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on August 28, 2017, 12:06:41 PM
Only the two-part finale is left, and Showtime is never gonna renew this shit. This is it, fams.  :tocry :rejoice :brazilcry :mouf :itagaki :delicious :salute
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on August 28, 2017, 12:33:38 PM
Only the two-part finale is left, and Showtime is never gonna renew this shit. This is it, fams.  :tocry :rejoice :brazilcry :mouf :itagaki :delicious :salute

Joke's on them, I ain't gonna renew Showtime either!
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on August 28, 2017, 01:28:10 PM
Only the two-part finale is left, and Showtime is never gonna renew this shit. This is it, fams.  :tocry :rejoice :brazilcry :mouf :itagaki :delicious :salute

Showtime is going to give us Blue Velvet: Frank Booth: The Beginning. I can feel it.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on August 28, 2017, 01:58:05 PM
Audrey is in a mental institution and all the Roadhouse characters from the little vignettes are also patients in the institution.  :mindblown
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on August 28, 2017, 04:06:41 PM
Audrey is in a mental institution and all the Roadhouse characters from the little vignettes are also patients in the institution.  :mindblown

Nah . . . Audrey wasn't present when James played "Just You and I" for Maddy and Donna, so I don't think she'd know that song.

spoiler (click to show/hide)
Unless James at some point played it for every chick in Twin Peaks while scroungin' around for ass
[close]
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Phoenix Dark on August 28, 2017, 05:13:56 PM
no renewal? Ratings that bad huh?
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Phoenix Dark on August 28, 2017, 10:02:07 PM
I'm genuinely curious! It seems to me that a lot of people are disappointed with the season, it's not what they wanted/thought Twin Peaks was, too much Lynch shit, etc.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on August 28, 2017, 10:41:29 PM
I'm genuinely curious! It seems to me that a lot of people are disappointed with the season, it's not what they wanted/thought Twin Peaks was, too much Lynch shit, etc.

It's pretty great, and if the past several eps are any indication, the finale should be pretty special. It's not perfect and certainly more geared toward Lynch fans in general than "traditional" TP fans. It requires a bit of patience, but it's ended up being very rewarding. If you're not a Lynch fan in general, I'd likely recommend avoiding.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: toku on August 28, 2017, 11:03:58 PM
excellent avatar tvc  :-[
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on August 29, 2017, 01:40:51 AM
Audrey is in a mental institution and all the Roadhouse characters from the little vignettes are also patients in the institution.  :mindblown

Nah . . . Audrey wasn't present when James played "Just You and I" for Maddy and Donna, so I don't think she'd know that song.

spoiler (click to show/hide)
Unless James at some point played it for every chick in Twin Peaks while scroungin' around for ass
[close]

Not all of the roadhouse scenes need to be a dream. Some can be real. Obviously the parts with james and Freddy were real since they are connected to other events in the show. It could also be a shared dream space. Many possibilities. Isn't it kind of odd for James (as cool as he always was) to get the same fanfare as NIN and Eddie Vedder?
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on August 29, 2017, 12:57:04 PM
Audrey is in a mental institution and all the Roadhouse characters from the little vignettes are also patients in the institution.  :mindblown

Nah . . . Audrey wasn't present when James played "Just You and I" for Maddy and Donna, so I don't think she'd know that song.

spoiler (click to show/hide)
Unless James at some point played it for every chick in Twin Peaks while scroungin' around for ass
[close]

Not all of the roadhouse scenes need to be a dream. Some can be real. Obviously the parts with james and Freddy were real since they are connected to other events in the show. It could also be a shared dream space. Many possibilities. Isn't it kind of odd for James (as cool as he always was) to get the same fanfare as NIN and Eddie Vedder?

? Neither NIN nor Pearl Jam have released anything as interesting as You and I in almost two decades.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on September 01, 2017, 02:19:20 PM
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/has-twin-peaks-been-a-hit-showtime-1034370

(http://i.imgur.com/SxJKjGWl.png)

:preach
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Dennis on September 01, 2017, 08:12:41 PM
I don't know how Season 3 wraps things up but I already know I want a Season 4.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: archie4208 on September 02, 2017, 07:06:02 AM
Assuming the finale is satisfying, I want the series to be done.  I've seen plenty of shows that outstayed their welcome and become less enjoyable as a whole due to going on longer than they should have.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: toku on September 02, 2017, 01:19:34 PM
Season 4: The Mitchums are so impressed with the town of Twin Peaks that they name their newest casino after it. We focus on the weirdo regulars at the casino, and the brothers struggle to keep their hearts of gold while still being gangsters.


(http://i.imgur.com/R3Ph8bR.gif)

would enjoy
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: StealthFan on September 02, 2017, 01:59:04 PM
I love this season. Only two episodes were stinkers. I really hope there is a new season, but I'd be satisfied if the ending to this one nails it.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on September 02, 2017, 11:21:41 PM
Yeah, I only disliked two episodes the entire season, I think. 6 and 12. And even upon rewatching those I liked them a lot more than I initially did. It took me a little bit of time to get used to the slower pacing (not a Lynch guy and I don't think he did the in the original TP), but by part 4 I was hooked!
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on September 03, 2017, 03:04:41 PM
(https://68.media.tumblr.com/e48418bbac9ce7be1b354da8f1286ced/tumblr_ov22dimvHB1tqtt3wo5_540.gif)

Showtime's doing a marathon right now if y'all are watching this legit like I am. Two hour finale at 8pm.

Let's rock.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on September 03, 2017, 07:05:35 PM
(https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--4cATFqI0--/c_scale,fl_progressive,q_80,w_800/jx8mnvs6ika6dwew2clm.jpg)

(https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--cDeFoXTR--/c_scale,fl_progressive,q_80,w_800/htm2obccey0ykwbeom7f.jpg)

Laura is the one.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on September 03, 2017, 08:00:50 PM
Here we go brehs. See you on the other side. :salute
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on September 03, 2017, 09:01:34 PM
HOLY SHIT that first part!!

- Confirmation on who/what "Judy" is.
- Eyeless chick is the real Diane!!!
- Time travel shenanigans!!
- BOB finally defeated!!!!! ...by Hulk Hands??

"We are like the dreamer."
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on September 03, 2017, 09:23:46 PM
We truly are the blue rose now, Elle.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on September 03, 2017, 09:57:35 PM
DIRECTED BY DAVID LYNCH

(https://media.giphy.com/media/9e1VPfBaNvvEY/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on September 03, 2017, 10:02:27 PM
So Judy = "Mother" who birthed BOB and tore those guys faces up in ep 2-3 or whatevs.

No confirmation on Sarah Palmer stuff but we'll assume she was the girl in the 50s flashback who ate the "bug."

Diane met Cooper after he did his time travel stuff in ep17 and they "crossed over"... into some kind of alternate reality where I assume Laura Palmer was never murdered. Diane became someone else, did Dale? Laura certainly became someone else.

"What year is it?"

That's the question!

Episode 17 can in many ways be viewed as the "true" ending to the series - BOB is defeated and Laura is rescued from her original gruesome death. Ep 18 is sort of a coda, some kind of alternate look at the world - perhaps it's the "real world" and Twin Peaks-verse was the "dream?"

"We are like the dreamer, who dreams and lives inside the dream."

Cooper was the only one to escape the "dream" into the real world.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on September 03, 2017, 10:09:42 PM
The true question is, despite my fanboyism - did this need to be 18 episodes? It was originally 9 and to be honest, this story could have been 9.

The ironic thing is that all the stuff anchoring this to the original Twin Peaks - Shelly's niece plotline, Caleb Landry Jones plotline, Norma "expand the RR" plotline, Dr. Jacoby radio "plotline," James and Hulk hand plotline (mostly), Andy and Lucy "plotline"... it was complete fluff to the overall narrative.

Twin Peaks: The Return edited back into 9 episode might be even more compelling. I'm not sure. 45 minutes of Episode 8 can not be cut down - that HAS to exist as it is, as do many other plotlines. And in a year or two I might be shouting accolades for Lynch's 18-hour pièce de résistance. And ANY Lynch content is gold after a 10-year absence. But as hard as it is for me to say, for the story it was trying to tell, 9 episodes of The Return may have worked even better.

Still, the final ep is going to keep many a fan coming back. There's a lot to evaluate here now that we have the whole picture to work from. Judy/Mother and Laura/texas chick especially.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on September 03, 2017, 10:14:12 PM
One last thing to note:

The "Lynch/Frost" production company clip at the end of the episode was silent. This was after Nue-Luara screamed and the lights went out in the final seconds. Electricity was always the Twin Peaks-verse boogieman, perhaps even more than BOB. I think this means electricity "ended" when Laura screamed.

Also I just realized neither episode 17 nor 18 contained ANY Audrey. Literally nothing. But why?

We knew she was in a coma since the season 2 finale - why show her at all if she had no progression? One more plotline to tie The Return to the original at the expense of the actual plotline being told.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on September 03, 2017, 10:34:50 PM
https://twitter.com/scott325/status/904525301417377793

https://twitter.com/jgesez/status/904528135630327808

https://twitter.com/jfuller100/status/904523829497778177
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on September 03, 2017, 10:46:08 PM
Part 18 was 4 parts Lost Highway and 1 part Mulholland Drive.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: archie4208 on September 04, 2017, 12:43:55 AM
I went from hating that ending to loving it and spending the past two hours reading theories.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on September 04, 2017, 01:01:03 AM
(https://i.imgur.com/6N1f53X.png)
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on September 04, 2017, 01:27:48 AM
(https://i.imgur.com/BUUa2ZB.jpg)
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Bebpo on September 04, 2017, 03:07:27 AM
Just finished it, gotta read theories, but on first viewing ep18 and the ending was terrible. Ep17 was good, but we waited all season to get real cooper back and he has half an ep at 16 and like 5 mins in ep17 and then he's gone again. Ep18 Cooper is not real cooper. He talks and acts like a mix of evil Cooper and red room out of it Cooper. Really disappointed all we got real Cooper with personality and a smile was for half of 16 and 5 mins of 17.

Ep 18 goes back to really slow and drawn out and boring and then non-ends it.

The entire ep17/18 I was waiting to go back to Audrey since you know ep16's ending reveal of Audrey waking up seemed like the start, not the end of her story part of S3. All of the side characters feel unfinished. What was the point of Jerry wandering around all those eps and seeing Evil Cooper and getting found naked? What was the point of Nadine's golden shovel besides her deciding she's fine with Ed leaving? Like did we really need all those scenes of the shovel just for that? What about the kids and the drug deal stuff that got all those scenes?

I was kinda giving Lynch the benefit of the doubt that nothing was "pointless" and that even stuff that seemed pointless would have a point in the end. But a lot of the subplots just seemed dropped.

Like it's well shot, and well directed, but feels unfinished. Like it needed another 5 episodes. Fan theories better make up for this.

We knew she was in a coma since the season 2 finale - why show her at all if she had no progression? One more plotline to tie The Return to the original at the expense of the actual plotline being told.

Huh? When did Audrey go into a coma in S2? I guess if that's the case than ep16's ending makes more sense. She wakes up. The end. I don't remember her going into a coma though and I only watched S2 a few months ago?
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Dennis on September 04, 2017, 03:18:32 AM
Episode 17 was just fantastic.

Episode 18 was not as good but the sense of dread was mesmerizing and the ending was absolutely haunting.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Bebpo on September 04, 2017, 03:28:27 AM
Just read some of the theories. Most are literally "We don't have much information, maybe S4? :lol"
Others are the cop out of all time cop outs for storytelling "IT WAS ALL A DREAM, ep18 is reality" THE END :|

I thought theories were supposed to find a way to make an ending satisfying.

Eh, I guess on the pro side the series did manage to resolve S2's cliffhanger with Cooper in the red room/evil cooper out and resolve BOB. Beyond that though, not sure what the point of the series was besides Lynch wankery and gorgeous framing.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on September 04, 2017, 03:36:26 AM
Well, this is a Lynch film alright. I don't understand anything.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on September 04, 2017, 03:39:20 AM
It's puzzling and upsetting that they completely wrote Annie out of existence.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Bebpo on September 04, 2017, 03:45:45 AM
What's frustrating is that at first glance the dream theory holds up. I saw on gaf someone said the dream has good cooper and evil cooper, the real world cooper is a mix of both. They go to the Palmer house and it's owned by the person who owns it currently in the real world. The only bit that doesn't make sense with that is it sounded like the last dialogue was Sarah saying Laura from inside the house? And Laura's scream of course.

Couple of questions of my own.

1. Why can't the ending just be that the time period Laura/Cooper went into in ep18 is even further in the past before Sara Palmer owned the house? Hence the What year is this?

2. So I thought after evil cooper got shot they took BOB out of him mid-season and he was BOB-less evil cooper for the 2nd half. Why did he still have BOB in him?
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on September 04, 2017, 03:54:11 AM
What's frustrating is that at first glance the dream theory holds up. I saw on gaf someone said the dream has good cooper and evil cooper, the real world cooper is a mix of both. They go to the Palmer house and it's owned by the person who owns it currently in the real world. The only bit that doesn't make sense with that is it sounded like the last dialogue was Sarah saying Laura from inside the house? And Laura's scream of course.

Couple of questions of my own.

1. Why can't the ending just be that the time period Laura/Cooper went into in ep18 is even further in the past before Sara Palmer owned the house? Hence the What year is this?

2. So I thought after evil cooper got shot they took BOB out of him mid-season and he was BOB-less evil cooper for the 2nd half. Why did he still have BOB in him?

The lady said the house was previously owned by Mrs. Chalfont. Her own name is Alice Tremond.

http://twinpeaks.wikia.com/wiki/Mrs._Tremond

I don't know what any of this means. Perhaps the purpose is to just generate a million different theories on the internet..
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: pilonv1 on September 04, 2017, 05:22:41 AM
Loved it. Only realised with less than 10 minutes to go that they hadn't done anything with the Audrey storyline and then realised why. Very excited to watch it again.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Bebpo on September 04, 2017, 05:33:53 AM
Audrey storyline = she had conflicts in her head and then woke up
Jerry storyline = he was high
Dr Jacobi storyline = he is crazy and sells shovels to idiots, the end
Nadine storyline = she buys a shovel and tells Ed he can see Norma, the end
Richard storyline = runs over a kid, escapes, coop kidnaps him, gets electrocuted, the end
etc...

Like despite the slower measured directorial approach and multiple scenes spread of tons of eps, a lot of the subplots were extremely simple and nothing. I feel like the show pretends to be a lot more clever than it actually is by obscuring things. The side-stuff (drug dealer kids for instance) reminded me of all the pointless/weak side-stuff that brings down S2. I'd put S3 about on par with S2 overall but far below S1.

I think my favorite characters in the show were the casino guys and the assassins. Favorite scene was probably the Polish Insurance shootout and maybe some Gordon/Albert stuff. As much as I hate on Lynch as a writer sometimes I love him as a comedic actor. He's hilarious.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Dennis on September 04, 2017, 09:34:29 AM
(https://i.imgur.com/9PxA9MO.jpg)
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Dennis on September 04, 2017, 12:13:58 PM
I like this take below. Wrong I am sure but it sounds as good as anything else you could think up.

https://www.reddit.com/r/twinpeaks/comments/6xyfrp/s3e18_theory_there_are_5_universes_3_of_which_are/
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on September 04, 2017, 12:54:29 PM
1. Why can't the ending just be that the time period Laura/Cooper went into in ep18 is even further in the past before Sara Palmer owned the house? Hence the What year is this?

They stopped at a modern Valero with contemporary gas prices, tho.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Dennis on September 04, 2017, 01:06:46 PM
(https://abload.de/img/twin-peaks-finale-reczpuwm.jpg)
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on September 04, 2017, 01:06:57 PM
Everything was Lynched


To recap, Lynch brought back his most famous and beloved work after 25+ years of people asking him to bring it back. He does so, but strips everything about it people loved, then ends the series by erasing the events of the series and doing another cliffhanger. When they never even addressed the FIRST series ending cliffhanger at all.

 :doge

Eh they did, Dooplecoop was a huge presence this season as was actual Coop's return from the Lodge.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on September 04, 2017, 01:12:25 PM
"I can't wait to see how Lynch wraps this up!"

spoiler (click to show/hide)
(https://i.redditmedia.com/dEvdLiXig9N7ZfajECcoUV-MeU99LslxDMfvVMg4Cyw.png?w=1024&s=945618de6f746edb511abf7400ad2126)
[close]
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Dennis on September 04, 2017, 01:16:01 PM
If you need a wrap-up just delete episode 18 from your mind and let episode 17 be the conclusion. Well, maybe minus the very last moments of 17.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on September 04, 2017, 01:20:21 PM
Stolen from 4chan.

Quote
last scene was a dream
laura in 1989 is the dreamer
cooper asks what year is it
laura's mother calls out to her from the waking world
laura recognizes her mother's voice and realize she's dreaming
she screams and wakes up back in 1989 the morning they would have found her body had cooper not had changed the past

Apparently the "Laura?" in the final scene is Sarah Palmer in the first ep, but slowed down/distorted a bit.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Bebpo on September 04, 2017, 01:23:45 PM
Why did Cooper even feel like he needed to go back and save Laura unless the lodge people/giant told him he needed to do that during his stay? Just seems kinda unnecessary when things were fine in the current time. Felt like he was doing it because the "gods" told him that was the plan he had to follow, but then it just fucked everything up so #godsbetrolling?
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on September 04, 2017, 01:27:10 PM
Huh? When did Audrey go into a coma in S2? I guess if that's the case than ep16's ending makes more sense. She wakes up. The end. I don't remember her going into a coma though and I only watched S2 a few months ago?

There's a throwaway line that Audrey went into a coma after the bank explosion in the s2 finale.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on September 04, 2017, 01:32:21 PM

2. So I thought after evil cooper got shot they took BOB out of him mid-season and he was BOB-less evil cooper for the 2nd half. Why did he still have BOB in him?

BOB clearly went back inside Mr. C in that instance. The blackface guys don't take BOB out, he comes out as a result of them feeding and will naturally go back in unless something else happens. It is interesting though they foreshadowed how Mr. C would be defeated/killed that early in the season, though.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Dennis on September 04, 2017, 01:32:29 PM
Why did Cooper even feel like he needed to go back and save Laura unless the lodge people/giant told him he needed to do that during his stay? Just seems kinda unnecessary when things were fine in the current time. Felt like he was doing it because the "gods" told him that was the plan he had to follow, but then it just fucked everything up so #godsbetrolling?

I think Cooper is a nice person who wants to genuinely save Laura Palmer from an awful fate. But the road to hell is paved with good intentions.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Bebpo on September 04, 2017, 02:13:20 PM
Huh? When did Audrey go into a coma in S2? I guess if that's the case than ep16's ending makes more sense. She wakes up. The end. I don't remember her going into a coma though and I only watched S2 a few months ago?

There's a throwaway line that Audrey went into a coma after the bank explosion in the s2 finale.

But if she's been in a coma since S2 end, how did she have Richard?
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on September 04, 2017, 02:45:55 PM
Huh? When did Audrey go into a coma in S2? I guess if that's the case than ep16's ending makes more sense. She wakes up. The end. I don't remember her going into a coma though and I only watched S2 a few months ago?

There's a throwaway line that Audrey went into a coma after the bank explosion in the s2 finale.

But if she's been in a coma since S2 end, how did she have Richard?

Evil Cooper raped her in the hospital.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on September 04, 2017, 03:03:11 PM
Huh? When did Audrey go into a coma in S2? I guess if that's the case than ep16's ending makes more sense. She wakes up. The end. I don't remember her going into a coma though and I only watched S2 a few months ago?

There's a throwaway line that Audrey went into a coma after the bank explosion in the s2 finale.

But if she's been in a coma since S2 end, how did she have Richard?

Evil Cooper raped her in the hospital.

Yup.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Bebpo on September 04, 2017, 04:21:17 PM
Ewwww.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on September 04, 2017, 04:46:06 PM
Ewwww.

Yup.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on September 04, 2017, 04:46:41 PM
Just realized we never got to see Ben Horne interact with anyone except his secretary and Jerry.  :-\
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Quaker on September 04, 2017, 07:12:13 PM
...a revival series where everything is promised to be explained...
Did anyone actually say this?
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Dennis on September 04, 2017, 07:16:32 PM
(https://media.giphy.com/media/3ov9k2oudIwj0yvzTW/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on September 04, 2017, 07:46:54 PM
...a revival series where everything is promised to be explained...
Did anyone actually say this?

Kyle MacLachlan did before the season aired, more or less, but I'm not sure why anyone would take his word for it. There's so much done in editing. Like, the ending scene was one of the first things they shot for this - if I was Kyle and that was the case, then I'd have assumed that scene was at the start of the series. If that was the case, and Episode 17 was the true end, then a lot of plots did get wrapped up (more or less.)
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on September 04, 2017, 07:47:22 PM
At the very least, Big Ed and Janey-E got unequivocally happy endings, so that's something.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Great Rumbler on September 04, 2017, 07:55:59 PM
(https://i.imgur.com/uhzCXJw.jpg)
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: ZephyrFate on September 04, 2017, 08:46:48 PM
I liked the finale. The "new world" Cooper and not-Laura exist in now is devoid of music, and the atmosphere is palpable because of it. Cooper not being Cooper anymore cements that. The mood struck when they both walk up to the Tremond/Chalfant's home is incredible, too. Those names are callbacks, too.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: toku on September 04, 2017, 09:44:46 PM
https://twitter.com/ericallenhatch/status/904726970763751424
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on September 05, 2017, 01:13:02 AM
Just realized we never got to see Ben Horne interact with anyone except his secretary and Jerry and Frank Truman and Sylvia.  :-\

FTFY

I think I've become more at peace with the ending once the initial shock and overwhelming feeling of bleakness subsided. Reading the various discussions/theories/speculation online helped. It definitely got people talking. I think part 18 is actually better than 17. 17 started out awesome with Cole giving us backstory about Judy and then tensions kept building up as Doppelcoop got to the sheriff station. But then it just became a ludicrous comic book cartoon with One Punch Man battling volleybob. Maybe that was the entire point of 17, to give the most over the top fanservice resolution Lynch thought the fans would want only to completely subvert and turn it inside out? Seems like the entire series was an exercise in fucking with our expectations.

What bothers me the most is Annie being written into nonexistence. I get it, maybe Lynch didn't come up with the character, maybe he didn't like her. But asking the audience to pretend that she never existed while shoehorning the Coop and Diane romance is a bit much. I honestly don't care about Coop+Diane, my emotional involvement in the relationship between those two characters is unearned. Heck, the Janey E and Dougie relationship is more real to me, and one of them is a vegetable/tulpa.

Too many things just feel retconn-y in the season, and that's my biggest regret about it. Like, how am I supposed supposed to buy that Judy is a primordial elemental evil when in FWWM Jeffries is talking about her as if she's a person? I always got a feeling that Jeffries was protective of Judy if anything.

Another gripe is that there are many unresolved and undeveloped themes. I wish we'd actually glean some insight into what was Doppelcoop's motives, what his endgoal was. Why was he looking for Mother/Judy? I did like how Doppelcoop, much like good Coop, thought he was the man with the plan but was ultimately helpless against the transdimensional beings of the lodges. Like when he entered the White Lodge seeing him caged and helpless, he was as much of a threat to the Fireman as an ant is to a person.

But, all in all, this was definitely a trip. People will be talking about Twin Peaks for a very long time, again.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on September 05, 2017, 11:05:00 AM
I'm overall happy with the ending, and I pretty much have been since my first viewing. The very last scene kind of reminded me of the last moments of Phantasm II, which is always a good thing.

That said, I do have a couple of gripes, probably shared with others.

1) Audrey. Although I've found myself flip-flopping on this, I still mostly wish that Audrey had more to do. Originally, I wished she had a scene after her "wake up" scene, but I've kind of come around to that being a cool enough ending for her character. She wasn't really important in the latter half of season 2, so I've come to accept that she was relegated to unconnected side story status. With that said, I wish that maybe her appearances were spread more throughout the season, or that there were a few of them in the first half. I dunno--I guess it fits with how the other "unimportant" TP characters were dealt with. They all got arcs across 3-4 episodes or so, generally in episodes grouped pretty closely together. Maybe this complaint isn't so much about Audrey as it is about these characters felt like afterthoughts kept around for old TP flavor.

2) I think we needed one more meaty Sarah Palmer scene. Maybe even just an extended take of her smashing Laura's picture with her maybe doing something else "lodgey." This is ultimately forgivable since the final scene plays with the expectation of encountering Sarah again, but really, Grace Zabriskie has been amazing and I wanted to see her chew on some scenery one last time.

          2a) Maybe an unfair bitching point, but I really wish Ray Wise had more than one scene in The Return.

3) I'm not terribly fond of the Judy-related retcon-y info Gordon is describing at the beginning of 17. I know it at least jives with FWWM, but I'm not sure if it does with the original series. Either way, it was an exposition dump that was really unnecessary to the plot at that point.

4) This totally could have been like 10 episodes. None of that Richard Horne stuff ended up being important. None of that Caleb Landry Whatever stuff ended up being important. None of the Shelly's daughter stuff ended up being important (we never even saw Shelly or Bobby's reaction to her apparent death--or even found out if she actually died). I'm forgiving of giving the old fan faves tossaway plots in order to score some nostalgia points and feels, but this season introduced a bunch of new characters that ended up not having a point or being entertaining, and then gave them more screen time than those old faves. I guess we at least got that awesome home invasion scene from Richard Horne.

5) I'm still unsure about the coordinates Mr. C wanted and what his goal was. Was he really looking for Judy, which seems like the most likely scenario given the white room sequence where the Giant changes the Palmer house to the police station as a trap. I know you shouldn't apply logic or thought to a Lynch story, but wouldn't Bob have noticed that he was living with Judy during that period that he killed Laura Palmer?

Overall, I loved the season, and I even liked the shaggy dogginess of a lot of it. It would just have been nicer if the dog was less shaggy in some areas and shaggier in others.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on September 05, 2017, 11:19:00 AM
Final scene should have been Cooper arm wrestling Judy for the fate of the multiverse.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: demi on September 05, 2017, 11:55:11 AM
So is it ok to like LOST now now that Twin Peaks went the same road?
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Dennis on September 05, 2017, 01:42:40 PM
So is it ok to like LOST now now that Twin Peaks went the same road?

No.

And comparing Twin Peaks to LOST  :trigger
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: fistfulofmetal on September 05, 2017, 02:26:59 PM
My girlfriend actively hated it and thought it was a bunch of pointless nonsense.

I shrugged and was happy to just see Sheryl Lee again.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Boredfrom on September 06, 2017, 11:00:36 PM
So is it ok to like LOST now now that Twin Peaks went the same road?

Nah, Lost promised answers since day 1 (and ended being a big lie), Lynch was forced to even resolve the killer plot line and admited he wanted to focus in town shenanigans.

Happy with the ending because I expected a bigger shitshow and is actually pretty coherent for lynch.

Quote
Mark Frost also promised resolution and a real conclusion. Maybe he failed to mention it was for his book and not the season.

But is a real conclusion and resolution: BOB is destroyed, EvilCoop returns to the Black Lodge to be farmed, Cooper chooses to save Laura and taking a chance with Diane in the alternate universe over having a normal life... And it backfires to an great extent.

Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on September 07, 2017, 12:17:19 AM
Still upset about the treatment of Annie. >:(
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on September 07, 2017, 01:55:29 AM
Are you fucking kidding me? Cooper was madly in love with her and she is the entire and sole reason he went into the Black Lodge and was stuck there for 25 years! I get that Lynch didn't like her. So what? She was important enough to be included in FWWM. And he still directed the S2 finale, so he OK'd her being the reason for Cooper going in the Lodge. To handwave her away and pretend that such a major event didn't exist completely kills the suspension of disbelief, at least FOR ME. You can disagree all you want, but your attempt to patronize and act like your opinion (much like the way Stro has behaved throughout the thread) is silly.

What was forced, on me, and many other people who felt the same way, is the dumb Cooper/Diane romance out of nowhere.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on September 07, 2017, 02:10:31 AM
The S2 Finale ended with Mr. C mockingly asking repeatedly "how's Annie?" The answer to the question thousands of TP fans wanted to know. That's why. Just like I wanted to know what happened with Big Ed, James, Bobby, Harry Truman, Andy and Lucy, etc. I am not even particularly fond of Annie as a character (although Heather Graham is lovely). But why completely disregard her when her fate was such an enormous part of the story and intertwined with Cooper's in such a significant way? That's not believable and a wasted opportunity. Especially when we get treated with followups with superfluous characters like the giggling German waitress and excruciating scenes of Dr. Jacoby painting golden shovels with little payoff (the entire point of the shovels was to give Nadine some perspective on life to finally set Ed free, which could have been accomplished in many different ways). Bah.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on September 07, 2017, 02:22:54 AM
Fair enough. Guess it didn't matter to me because it felt like something Lynch had to deal with then in spite of his prior un-involvement with the character's creation. So I didn't mind having her ignored completely.

That just sounds fanboyish to me, I'm sorry. Lynch is brilliant, but he is not without flaws. A cohesive narrative is internally consistent. If it wasn't beneath him to explain other character's absences with off-screen explanations and weird teapots, he could've easily explained Annie away with a couple of minutes of dialogue. But I get that certain things are important to some and not to others. The "how's Annie" part was one of my favorite parts of the entire TP saga, it's stuck with me since I originally saw the series when I was a kid. So to me Annie was always a huge part of the mythology of TP, and to have her dismissed so unceremoniously rubs me the wrong way.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on September 07, 2017, 02:34:10 AM
Yes, Annie is the reason Coop went into the Lodge, and therefore the reason Mr. C exists, and without her there is no plot to season 3, so the idea that the only mention she got in The Return was the clip from FWWM is pretty odd. Coop gave zero fucks about her after that and instead fell in love with a woman who screamed at him all the time when he was doing the Dougie. Donna had no real impact on the main plot. Annie was crucial to it at the end.

Where are DoppleAnnie and DoppleWindom? How can you gloss over Annie apparently being released from the Lodge in possession of the ring, the ring being taken by the nurse, and then....you never hear about either of them again? That's a pretty big thing to just ignore entirely. Especially since that stuff came with Lynch leading it up. And then she's erased from Secret History, which Lynch had nothing to do with.

For once I completely agree with Stro in the Twin Peaks thread!  :bow2
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on September 07, 2017, 02:35:19 AM
Well, I am not a fan of Nadine (nor of Mega-Nadine, or Shovel-enthusiast-Nadine or any iteration of her), but I can't just will her existence away like that.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on September 07, 2017, 07:12:24 AM
People were saying "Oh, it'd be better when you watch it all at once", but no, it actually gets worse. Yes, it flows better and doesn't feel quite as agonizingly slow, but now you know you're wasting your time with 90% of the show, and the Dougie stuff is WORSE because you know Cooper is fully aware under there, and the Lodge can interact with him in the real world, but instead of having him do anything with electricity, they have him PLAYING SLOT MACHINES AND DOING INSURANCE FRAUD CASES.

Don't take your show from a murder mystery of a teenage girl in a quirky city with some supernatural elements that act as an allegory for abuse to a cosmic battle for good and evil and a primordial evil warping reality and then expect me to to be interested in seeing a man with a toddler's intellect figuring out insurance fraud with the help of an interdimensional one armed man as multiple people fail to kill him Azin humorous ways.

I'm pretty sure you're just a distinguished mentally-challenged fellow that had distinguished mentally-challenged expectations. Lynch, in his imperfect career, has never retread ground. If you thought this was going to be TP TV as usual, you're dumber than Arvie's dad when he decided to not put a condom on. This season was pretty fantastic. Any indulgences were forgivable by the end. There was superfluous material at times, but it was rarely a real distraction. .
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Boredfrom on September 07, 2017, 03:41:23 PM
Doesn't seem that the reality resets so much that Cooper and Diane travel to another dimension/timeline. The fact that Lynch/Frost put the Dougie Jones resolution after Cooper alters Laura death is a way to say "this still counts".
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on September 07, 2017, 05:53:49 PM
The point of The Return was to be another one of Lynch's meditations on identity. Dougie is central to that entire idea.

It's like complaining about Balthazar Getty in Lost Highway.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on September 07, 2017, 06:10:29 PM
I haven't watched Lost Highway. I read the plot synopsis online, and it kind of sounds like Lost Highway is TP Season 3 Part 18: The Movie?
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on September 07, 2017, 06:30:59 PM
I haven't watched Lost Highway. I read the plot synopsis online, and it kind of sounds like Lost Highway is TP Season 3 Part 18: The Movie?

Yes, as I said before:

Part 18 was 4 parts Lost Highway and 1 part Mulholland Drive.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on September 07, 2017, 08:35:22 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8z_VcgxDGRM
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on September 07, 2017, 08:44:09 PM
Cooper didn't understand/didn't remember the Fireman's message. He didn't remember Richard and Linda  :-\
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Boredfrom on September 08, 2017, 02:50:36 PM
Cooper didn't understand/didn't remember the Fireman's message. He didn't remember Richard and Linda  :-\

Cooper forgot a lot of stuff in the original Twin Peaks, including stuff like Laura telling him who killed her. Whatever is that already expected by the Black/White Lodge seems to be mostly unclear. The Fireman warned him about not remembering something in the beginning of season 2 ( Audrey's note) and she was almost killed because of it.

In that note, the Giant/Fireman seems to be genuinely benign compared with the other super natural advisors. Probably that's why he only appeared in the white&albacore room (white lodge?) in this season.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Boredfrom on September 08, 2017, 08:28:42 PM
http://www.waggish.org/2017/twin-peaks-finale/


An interesting take. I don't know if I agree with it or not, but it seems as plausible as just about anything else.

I agree with some stuff (like Judy being in a cosmic trap and being Sarah Palmer, Richard and Lucy being alternate dimension personalities that are goping to overwrite Copper and Diane, the white lodge helping Cooper to get to Dougie Jones, Cooper gaining "enlightment" ). But the Garmonbozia bomb sounds far fetched as fuck (given how little we know it operates), the plan to move to an alternate dimension because how destructive the bomb is it sounds like something from Crisis on the Infinite Earths and the fact that we kind of dont know if the Cooper, Briggs, Cole meeting was with the real Cooper or with the DopplegangerBob, the main antognist is still Bob given that the whole plot still moves around for his search of Judy and how it seems that the white/black lodge were trying to stop him with different gambits.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on September 08, 2017, 10:32:48 PM
I like that theory a lot, and it makes the most sense to me, especially in how it addresses all the different clues and out of order continuity issues. It dots all the i's and crosses all the t's. And it's really not any more far fetched than any other theory nor things that actually happened in the show.

I also think, within the framework of this theory, the orb that the Fireman created and sent to Earth was not Laura herself, but the spirit bomb to be placed within her.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on September 08, 2017, 11:47:44 PM
Yeah, I know. When I watched part 18 the first time it also occured to me that Cooper may simply be a schizophrenic. But all those scenarios make the entire series kind of a waste, I don't think Lynch meant for the entire show to be a dream.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Boredfrom on September 09, 2017, 02:56:11 AM
As far fetched as the bomb thing sounds, the episode before it had a random Brit with a super powered garden glove punch BOB the bowling ball to pieces and kill him for good.

I get you but there was at least some build up about that. There is even a build up with Judy and alternate dimensions. The Twin Peaks´ Genkidama sounds like wishful thinking.

Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on September 09, 2017, 05:05:05 PM
The buildup was in episode 8, breh. Also, Episode 1 and 17. "Remember Richard and Linda." The Fireman was aware of everything that would happen, it was all part of the plan, brehs.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Boredfrom on September 09, 2017, 05:18:28 PM
Even with one episode of build that's such an absurd concept.


I wish we got a Ben/Beverly sex scene instead of Diane/Coop  :shaq2


Perhaps Lynch will explain it all on the director's commentary tracks  :crowdlaff

He is going to make a film with the deleted/cut footage if TP: Missing Pieces is anything to go by.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on September 10, 2017, 01:17:52 AM
Rewatched the last three episodes today. The more I think about it, the more I become convinced that the Odessa dimension is a trap set by the White Lodge theory is the correct one. Why else would the Fireman give clues to Cooper about everything in the first episode? He said "remember 430, Richard and Linda, two birds with one stone." It's all clearly a part of some plan and he wants to make sure that Cooper is aware of these things as it will help him in following through with his plan. Now, it seems Cooper forgot about "Richard and Linda," as he seems confused when he reads the note. Or maybe it hit him later, he had plenty of time to think with all the driving he did. I think Cooper is aware that he is in some dream dimension, because he barely bats an eye on the dead guy in Carrie's home. Maybe even because he remembers about Richard, he is aware that he is in someone else's dream.

Now, you may say that Lynch doesn't operate like that, his works are abstract and there are no clear cut answers. That may be true, but let's not forget that he is only 1/2 of the creative force behind Twin Peaks. And it seems to me that the mythology of Twin Peaks, the various beings and their positions on the sides of good vs. evil is Mark Frost's contribution. I'm willing bet that his idea of the plot is a lot more concrete, and was abstracted by Lynch's artistic vision. Maybe we will see when the Final Dossier comes out.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Boredfrom on September 10, 2017, 01:11:00 PM
Rewatched the last three episodes today. The more I think about it, the more I become convinced that the Odessa dimension is a trap set by the White Lodge theory is the correct one. Why else would the Fireman give clues to Cooper about everything in the first episode? He said "remember 430, Richard and Linda, two birds with one stone." It's all clearly a part of some plan and he wants to make sure that Cooper is aware of these things as it will help him in following through with his plan. Now, it seems Cooper forgot about "Richard and Linda," as he seems confused when he reads the note. Or maybe it hit him later, he had plenty of time to think with all the driving he did. I think Cooper is aware that he is in some dream dimension, because he barely bats an eye on the dead guy in Carrie's home. Maybe even because he remembers about Richard, he is aware that he is in someone else's dream.

Now, you may say that Lynch doesn't operate like that, his works are abstract and there are no clear cut answers. That may be true, but let's not forget that he is only 1/2 of the creative force behind Twin Peaks. And it seems to me that the mythology of Twin Peaks, the various beings and their positions on the sides of good vs. evil is Mark Frost's contribution. I'm willing bet that his idea of the plot is a lot more concrete, and was abstracted by Lynch's artistic vision. Maybe we will see when the Final Dossier comes out.

I think is correct to asume that Frost is the one that gives coherence to Twin Peaks and probably has more insight in the hidden meanings that Lynch himself. I don't agree with the bomb theory, but I can see Frost trying to work some sort of conclusion for the myth arc from this.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: toku on September 14, 2017, 10:33:34 AM
https://twitter.com/ericallenhatch/status/906350735339683841
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on September 14, 2017, 11:14:28 AM
http://welcometotwinpeaks.com/news/twin-peaks-season-4-years/

Quote
While taking several questions from the audience face-to-face, the director declined to reveal the fate of Audrey Horne, whose very last shot in Part 15 was both abrupt and confusing. “What matters is what you believe happened,” he clarified. “Many things in life just happen and we have to come to our own conclusions. You can, for example, read a book that raises a series of questions, and you want to talk to the author, but he died a hundred years ago. That’s why everything is up to you.”

Quote
Whether there will be a 4th season of Twin Peaks is too early to say, he told the crowd, adding that if the series would continue, fans would have to be extremely patient. Again. “It took me four and a half years to write and film this season.”

In other words, ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: chronovore on September 18, 2017, 05:14:15 AM
https://twitter.com/michelledean/status/907723705286930433
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Boredfrom on September 18, 2017, 01:54:33 PM
http://welcometotwinpeaks.com/news/twin-peaks-season-4-years/

Quote
While taking several questions from the audience face-to-face, the director declined to reveal the fate of Audrey Horne, whose very last shot in Part 15 was both abrupt and confusing. “What matters is what you believe happened,” he clarified. “Many things in life just happen and we have to come to our own conclusions. You can, for example, read a book that raises a series of questions, and you want to talk to the author, but he died a hundred years ago. That’s why everything is up to you.”

Quote
Whether there will be a 4th season of Twin Peaks is too early to say, he told the crowd, adding that if the series would continue, fans would have to be extremely patient. Again. “It took me four and a half years to write and film this season.”

In other words, ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

That is Lynch for you lol

https://twitter.com/michelledean/status/907723705286930433

But what does the cow mean?
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on September 18, 2017, 01:59:50 PM
Lynch doing anything again would be a minor miracle. I'm still reeling from the fact we got 18 hours of new, unadulterated Lynch visual media content after 11 years of nothing.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on September 18, 2017, 04:43:05 PM
But what does the cow mean?

Everything.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tokyosandblaster on September 19, 2017, 04:58:59 PM
http://welcometotwinpeaks.com/news/twin-peaks-season-4-years/

Quote
While taking several questions from the audience face-to-face, the director declined to reveal the fate of Audrey Horne, whose very last shot in Part 15 was both abrupt and confusing. “What matters is what you believe happened,” he clarified. “Many things in life just happen and we have to come to our own conclusions. You can, for example, read a book that raises a series of questions, and you want to talk to the author, but he died a hundred years ago. That’s why everything is up to you.”

Quote
Whether there will be a 4th season of Twin Peaks is too early to say, he told the crowd, adding that if the series would continue, fans would have to be extremely patient. Again. “It took me four and a half years to write and film this season.”

In other words, ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Damn. Episode 17 was a great end to the series and then 18 happened. I'd love a season 4 with semi-Coop and Laura adventures through time-fucked alternate reality.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on September 19, 2017, 11:17:15 PM
Well, I planned to re-watch the entire season after the finale, but I don't have the will power (don't get me wrong, I loved it, but it requires a commitment). Bye bye Showtime!
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on September 19, 2017, 11:30:11 PM
BTW, if it ended at 17, I would have been so let down. That ending would have been completely half-assed, rushed, unimaginative, unsatisfying conclusion filled with fan-service and cliches, broadcast through a rose-colored screen. Maybe that was the whole point. Lynch gave us the most cliche, fan-service ending he could only to subvert it and turn it inside out.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Bebpo on September 20, 2017, 06:22:15 PM
BTW, if it ended at 17, I would have been so let down. That ending would have been completely half-assed, rushed, unimaginative, unsatisfying conclusion filled with fan-service and cliches, broadcast through a rose-colored screen. Maybe that was the whole point. Lynch gave us the most cliche, fan-service ending he could only to subvert it and turn it inside out.

What about if you think both endings suck?  :doge
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Bebpo on September 20, 2017, 10:04:23 PM
Then they should go back to playing Knack  :P

You get a pass on this since it's your birthday. Happy Birthday Wrath!
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on September 21, 2017, 02:35:35 AM
Fuck you bebpo, you piece of shit.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on September 21, 2017, 02:46:41 AM
well, that escalated quickly
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on September 21, 2017, 01:13:56 PM
I didn't get a pass cause it was my birthday. :(
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: chronovore on September 23, 2017, 07:47:51 PM
https://twitter.com/ronb8s/status/911716987293880322
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Dennis on September 24, 2017, 07:53:01 AM
Finally, the Lynch Cinematic Universe we have been waiting for.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on November 01, 2017, 01:45:27 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PDsApek3eQE

http://www.indiewire.com/2017/10/twin-peaks-final-dossier-series-finale-explained-part-18-1201893015/
http://www.indiewire.com/2017/10/twin-peaks-audrey-horne-truth-revealed-spoilers-1201892814/

Final Dossier out here giving us more than we'd ever hoped for :rejoice
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on November 01, 2017, 02:36:14 AM
The new book isn’t as good as Secret History. There are good bits, but it feels kinda hastily written and it’s not as well put together visual-wise as Secret History. It’s still a must for fans, but it feels far more like a cash-in than the first book.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Bebpo on November 01, 2017, 03:10:07 AM
The new book isn’t as good as Secret History. There are good bits, but it feels kinda hastily written and it’s not as well put together visual-wise as Secret History. It’s still a must for fans, but it feels far more like a cash-in than the first book.

Does it flesh out the world of S3 more though? Besides those 2 links Andy provided in the previous post. Debating whether to pick it up.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Bebpo on November 01, 2017, 03:27:23 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PDsApek3eQE

http://www.indiewire.com/2017/10/twin-peaks-final-dossier-series-finale-explained-part-18-1201893015/
http://www.indiewire.com/2017/10/twin-peaks-audrey-horne-truth-revealed-spoilers-1201892814/

Final Dossier out here giving us more than we'd ever hoped for :rejoice

I'm about done with the audio book and it hasn't given much of anything that most people didn't infer and agree was the case from watching the season 3.  :yeshrug It's basically confirmed fan speculation and some background of minor characters between seasons 2 and 3 that really has no impact on anything other than fan service.

The whole world was just dying to find out about Donna's modeling career  :beli

Thanks, sounds like a pass.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on November 01, 2017, 03:53:43 AM
The new book isn’t as good as Secret History. There are good bits, but it feels kinda hastily written and it’s not as well put together visual-wise as Secret History. It’s still a must for fans, but it feels far more like a cash-in than the first book.

Does it flesh out the world of S3 more though? Besides those 2 links Andy provided in the previous post. Debating whether to pick it up.

Nope, as answered above.

The most infuriating part is the section on Annie. You see there’s an Annie section and you feel like you’re about to learn something new, but

 (Not really a spoiler, but tagging for the sensitive)

spoiler (click to show/hide)
after a one paragraph summary of her and her relationship with Coop in S2, the section diverges into being about Coop’s relationship with Windom Earle’s wife, revealing nothing unrevealed in the series by this point
[close]

It’s such a tease. It’s not the only big tease. Not rocking the boat was clearly a goal with this book.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on November 01, 2017, 11:33:18 AM
Oh man, had no idea this was out. Thanks for the update Andy, not clicking the spoilers though!
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Mr. Gundam on November 01, 2017, 12:21:12 PM
And now they're teasing a fourth season with Showtime...

Also, local brewery had these glasses made right before Season 3 started up.

(https://untappd.akamaized.net/photo/2017_09_10/c2ba39ba48e4a62cdf97ce3ad5fe8860_640x640.jpg)
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Rich! on November 01, 2017, 01:56:18 PM
Please showtime, lynch and frost

bless us with another 18 episodes of lunacy
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Rich! on November 01, 2017, 02:38:25 PM
Half the cast died during and after production. I don't doubt Lynch could do it but a 4th season :lol

I'd be first in line, but a lot of people will be expecting answers this time and they sure as hell ain't getting it.

I only count four people....doc Hayward, Albert, log lady and Carl Rodd. They could easily carry on without them, their stories are finished.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Bebpo on November 01, 2017, 02:48:00 PM
Half the cast died during and after production. I don't doubt Lynch could do it but a 4th season :lol

I'd be first in line, but a lot of people will be expecting answers this time and they sure as hell ain't getting it.

Well that's why he took the show to not-Twin Peaks :P Doesn't need any of the cast alive besides Cooper & Laura.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on November 01, 2017, 03:04:18 PM
In Season 4, Cooper might just be a talking dog chew-toy or a sentient bottle of water, who knows?
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Mr. Gundam on November 02, 2017, 01:23:55 PM
Half the cast died during and after production. I don't doubt Lynch could do it but a 4th season :lol

I'd be first in line, but a lot of people will be expecting answers this time and they sure as hell ain't getting it.

Well that's why he took the show to not-Twin Peaks :P Doesn't need any of the cast alive besides Cooper & Laura.

They could cast whoever is still around in new roles and use the alternate reality excuse for those who have passed away.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TEEEPO on November 02, 2017, 02:10:03 PM
but another season would ruin that perfect ending :maf

eps 18 is peak lynch
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Mr. Gundam on November 02, 2017, 06:32:07 PM
Half the cast died during and after production. I don't doubt Lynch could do it but a 4th season :lol

I'd be first in line, but a lot of people will be expecting answers this time and they sure as hell ain't getting it.

Well that's why he took the show to not-Twin Peaks :P Doesn't need any of the cast alive besides Cooper & Laura.

They could cast whoever is still around in new roles and use the alternate reality excuse for those who have passed away.

The book implied that the same things happened, just in a different manner. Leland still killed himself but at a different time and different way, Laura was never found, etc.

I was talking about the world that Cooper found himself in. They could get creative with casting.

I'd rather they just leave the show alone.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Akala on November 02, 2017, 07:33:04 PM
book seems trash tier. agree with what TVC said above. secret history was pretty stupid, but it was a well-done stupid with a lot of care put in. new one is phoned-in.

I'd be ok with more show, I am just pretty checked-out at this point. twin peaks effectively ends at the end of S1.

Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Akala on November 02, 2017, 07:39:08 PM
Half the cast died during and after production. I don't doubt Lynch could do it but a 4th season :lol

I'd be first in line, but a lot of people will be expecting answers this time and they sure as hell ain't getting it.

Well that's why he took the show to not-Twin Peaks :P Doesn't need any of the cast alive besides Cooper & Laura.

They could cast whoever is still around in new roles and use the alternate reality excuse for those who have passed away.

The book implied that the same things happened, just in a different manner. Leland still killed himself but at a different time and different way, Laura was never found, etc.

I was talking about the world that Cooper found himself in. They could get creative with casting.

I'd rather they just leave the show alone.

look what they did with bob and briggs. they could oh...cast other people but why do that when you can just have stupid cutouts and do whatever the fuck with the audio.

just talking about this show makes me mad, it totally triggered me like nothing else I can remember :lol
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: ZombieSupaStar on November 02, 2017, 09:09:36 PM
I was so sure when Vincent Castellanos was casted for Season 3 he was going to be Bob somehow, instead he was a lame RR waiter asking Richard not to smoke.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on November 04, 2017, 01:48:53 AM
Yessss, my copy of the Final Dossier arrived this morning. Can't wait to dig into it.  :D
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: ZombieSupaStar on November 04, 2017, 05:00:21 PM
Yessss, my copy of the Final Dossier arrived this morning. Can't wait to dig into it.  :D

How Annie!?  :)
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: fistfulofmetal on November 04, 2017, 05:10:26 PM
I got this Final Dossier book and I realized I probably won't actually read it.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on November 05, 2017, 01:21:35 AM
And now I left the fucking book at work, just when I was getting into it  ::)
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on January 13, 2018, 06:15:48 PM
I get to touch Ray Wise and Bobby and James and Sherilyn Fenn and Madchen Amick today <3
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on January 13, 2018, 10:24:34 PM
I told Ray Wise that I loved his recent Tim and Eric’s Bedtime Stories ep and he replied “Tim and Eric are wonderful boys!” with a big goofy Ray Wise smile. I felt a love connection.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: BlueTsunami on January 14, 2018, 01:07:04 AM
Did Madchen Amick glow like I've imagined?
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on January 14, 2018, 04:03:00 AM
Oh yes. Impressions from the meet and greet:

Lucy and Andy: They are basically their characters from the show.

Ray Wise: A god. He sang “Mares Eat Oats” at a fans request and got into it.

James: As big a loser in real life as he was on the show. He didn’t make eye contact with anyone and constantly looked down. During the panel, he looked depressed the whole time because every time he was mentioned it was joke about how lame he was. Refused to sing a little bit of “You and I”.

Sherilyn: She was awesome and intense and probably crazy. It seemed like she somehow got into an intense conversation with 9 out of 10 people at the meet and greet. She got teary a lot when people told her how much they loved Audrey. She was also looking mighty fine.

Madchen: She was really sweet. I didn’t really get to chat with her much, but she looked amazing. I told her I love her on Riverdale.

Chrysta Bell: Came across as really phony at both the panel and the meet and greet. She also looked amazing and has a like 10 inch waist.

Hawk: He was very cool and laid back and completely unlike his character on the show. He was really funny.

Bobby: Really goofy and fun. Said his favorite scene on the show was the vomiting kid, and I told him it was the most brilliant thing I saw on TV this year.

Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on January 14, 2018, 04:13:06 PM
:o

:rejoice

:bow TVC :bow2
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on January 18, 2018, 05:21:30 PM
Part of the charm.

Mother killing those two kids in the first ep wouldn't have been nearly as effective with a $100-million budget CG model.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on January 18, 2018, 11:51:38 PM
Waahh waaahhh.

Real art is messy, fuckhole.

You want gloss and pomp? Go see Star Wars Episode 9, in theaters next winter. Directed by JJ Abrams with contributions from 5,163 CG animators.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on January 20, 2018, 07:51:14 PM
From the panel last week, a significant portion of it wasn’t in the script and done on the spot, too. Sherilyn implied that she got her whole part changed during filming. Andy and Lucy were called back in to do impromptu random scenes. Chrysta Bell said the same thing.

What was weird about Sherilyn was that she was very frank about how unhappy she was with her part. Her voice was cracking and she said she wanted this for years, but she ended up feeling like it was a mean joke. And then, the very next question was about working with David, and she did a complete 180 and talked about how brilliant he is and how amazing he was to work with, and how he has this magical presence when he was around. A lot of the cast sounded like cult members talking about their dear leader when asked about him.

Mark Frost has basically said his role in the show ended after he finished writing the story with David, before it was even turned into a script.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on January 20, 2018, 08:36:23 PM
Yeah, when she talked about getting her part changed, she stopped herself from going into detail and said David would get pissed if she talked too much about it.

She got really emotional talking about how she just wanted one scene with Coop. She sounded like she really loved him (or Kyle). She said she told David to even just have him passing by in a car during one of her scenes.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on January 20, 2018, 09:00:08 PM
I’m trying to remember more details.

Ray Wise said David and Mark were working on it formally for years before it was announced. On the original TP Complete Mystery set, which was like a year before S3 was announced, Ray said the bonus feature meeting between David, Sheryl Lee, and Grace was filmed a day or two after David’s first formal meeting with them about S3. He said David had been mentioning it to him happening for a year or two before that.

Before the official announcement, Ray, Sheryl, Kyle, Grace, Chrysta, Catherine Coulson, and Michael Hawk were the only cast members that knew it was being made. It was a surprise to everyone else.

Also, David is good friends with the entire cast, and they’ve all been in regular contact with him (and each other) since the original series.

Oh, Laura Dern charmed the pants off everyone. Her and David seemed like super close friends and he treated her as his equal. David calls everyone by their character name, even irl sometimes, but he always calls Laura “Peanut.” Not even Kyle got a special nickname.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: toku on January 20, 2018, 09:35:13 PM
i would shoot my shot if i had a chance at laura dern 2018 tbqh
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on January 21, 2018, 11:32:29 AM
This is fascinating. Keep it coming!

Lynch has always seemed pretty cantankerous and opaque so the fact that the cast still love him says a lot IMO.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on January 22, 2018, 01:42:04 AM
Lmao, Lynch throws an absolute SHIT FIT near the end of 5 hours of bonus features, absolutely furious that they only had 2 days to shoot at the Great Northern, talking about how fucking horrible it was to work this way and he's never going to work like this again because he has no time to shoot weird shit or experiment and blah blah blah.

He then reveals that a few days away from shooting the big showdown in Truman's office with Coops and BOB, he has NO IDEA WHAT WAS GOING TO HAPPEN OR WHAT HE WAS GOING TO SHOOT. He had nothing written for it, all he knew is that he had all the people who were supposed to be there. So, if it seemed like that whole scene was made up on the spot bullshit: IT WAS.

It's amazing how, after all the time and thought that went into this, how fucking slapdash and last minute it was. The fuck.

Makes me wonder what the original write up he made with Mark Frost looks like. Is it just like “everyone walks into the sheriff’s office and yada yada yada Cooper and Diane are in a strange new place.”
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on January 22, 2018, 01:49:33 AM
Are there any deleted scenes that expand on the lore at all?
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on January 24, 2018, 12:15:41 AM
I read Mark Frost's last book. It's not enough.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: pilonv1 on January 24, 2018, 01:16:32 AM
The Final Dossier starts out well with the demise of Leo but some of it is just too light on details (like the Coop/Audrey stuff). Felt like an epilogue of the Secret History and not a stand alone book.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: VomKriege on January 24, 2018, 03:53:28 AM
Lmao, Lynch throws an absolute SHIT FIT near the end of 5 hours of bonus features, absolutely furious that they only had 2 days to shoot at the Great Northern, talking about how fucking horrible it was to work this way and he's never going to work like this again because he has no time to shoot weird shit or experiment and blah blah blah.

He then reveals that a few days away from shooting the big showdown in Truman's office with Coops and BOB, he has NO IDEA WHAT WAS GOING TO HAPPEN OR WHAT HE WAS GOING TO SHOOT. He had nothing written for it, all he knew is that he had all the people who were supposed to be there. So, if it seemed like that whole scene was made up on the spot bullshit: IT WAS.

It's amazing how, after all the time and thought that went into this, how fucking slapdash and last minute it was. The fuck.

Welcome to filmmaking.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: pilonv1 on January 25, 2018, 01:50:02 AM
Half the book was blank pages since every character was a new chapter and the left page was blank.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: toku on February 13, 2018, 09:18:32 PM
https://twitter.com/ThatsOurWaldo/status/963461025608683520
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: BlueTsunami on February 13, 2018, 09:29:04 PM
Obama is White Lodge entity. I am not surprised
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on February 13, 2018, 09:36:51 PM
https://www.reddit.com/r/twinpeaks/comments/7wv0r2/no_spoilers_did_i_just_found_out_the_meaning_of/

:ohhh
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Skullfuckers Anonymous on February 28, 2018, 06:03:13 PM
Apparently David Lynch Teaches Typing is a thing.

https://rhinostew.itch.io/david-lynch-teaches-typing

Apologies if it sucks, I'm still at work so I haven't gotten the chance to play it yet.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: naff on March 01, 2018, 04:50:33 PM
Obama is White Lodge entity. I am not surprised

Nah, Black Lodge plant

Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: chronovore on April 21, 2018, 10:08:35 AM
https://twitter.com/astra/status/987519492405252096
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on June 19, 2018, 04:06:41 PM
http://www.vulture.com/2018/06/david-lynch-memoir-twin-peaks-showtime.html#comments

Props to Showtime.

It still feels like a dream that this even came out, let alone a year ago, but I suppose that's thematically appropriate.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: EVOL on June 20, 2018, 01:08:37 AM
Why does that seem like 10% of an article and where are the comments

 :kobeyuck

Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on June 22, 2018, 06:18:44 PM
https://consequenceofsound.net/2018/06/david-lynch-teases-more-twin-peaks-at-book-signing/

:gladbron :rejoice
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on June 22, 2018, 06:19:52 PM
To the best of my knowledge, this is the first time Lynch has responded in the slightest bit positive to new TP.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on June 22, 2018, 07:10:14 PM
That was the best :lawd
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on June 22, 2018, 07:12:20 PM
Maybe he can write a scene to override a random chav One Punch Man punching bowling ball Bob out of existence

They can easily have that whole scene be a dream or something.

Apparently the magic green glove was planned from the very beginning of the series and Jack Nance was supposed to be the original green arm man.

That was the best :lawd

Both the Bobball and the Jeffries tea pot felt like creative solutions for impossible problems.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on July 22, 2018, 02:00:08 PM
‘Twin Peaks’: David Lynch Sends a Bizarre Message to Comic-Con Fans and Rejects Kyle MacLachlan’s Emmy Snub (https://www.indiewire.com/2018/07/twin-peaks-david-lynch-kyle-maclachlan-emmys-comic-con-1201986660/)

According to The Cast, Working On Twin Peaks Was Both ‘Transcendent’ and ‘Arousing’ (http://www.vulture.com/2018/07/the-twin-peaks-cast-describes-working-on-it-as-arousing.html)
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on July 22, 2018, 02:48:06 PM
 :tauntaun
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Boredfrom on July 22, 2018, 03:20:41 PM
Quote
Sutherland revealed that Lynch had texted her, “I got my days mixed up and I’m going to be there yesterday if not sooner. It’s slippery in here. In the Red Room, Special Agent Dale Cooper has already won the Emmy.” Earlier this month, the Academy failed to nominate anyone from “Twin Peaks” for acting, including star Kyle MacLachlan, who had portrayed three different characters. The stellar, nuanced performance was one of the most egregious snubs for the series, among many. Lynch makes it clear that in his universe, at least some things work out the way they should.


 :ohyeah
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: BlueTsunami on August 03, 2018, 02:23:59 PM
(https://abload.de/img/capture_2018-08-03-14nlivz.png) (https://abload.de/image.php?img=capture_2018-08-03-14nlivz.png)
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on September 04, 2018, 10:23:01 PM
https://www.reddit.com/r/twinpeaks/comments/9ctjqc/no_spoilers_but_stop_by_i_have_coffee_and_pie_for/

(https://i.imgur.com/oEi7JKl.png)
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on September 04, 2018, 10:36:20 PM
(https://i.imgur.com/OXLWhTA.jpg)
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on September 05, 2018, 11:07:43 AM
Which one of them is you?

I’m the Trixie impersonator.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on September 07, 2018, 10:11:01 PM
https://www.ar15.com/forums/general/Lara-Flynn-Boyle-has-gone-downhill/5-2080914/
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on September 07, 2018, 10:39:48 PM
https://www.ar15.com/forums/general/Lara-Flynn-Boyle-has-gone-downhill/5-2080914/

She’s living her best life without giving a fuck whereas Atra has reduced himself to gluten-free pizza out of pathetic fear of his own mortality.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on September 09, 2018, 05:01:01 PM
https://www.etsy.com/listing/624828770/donna-smiths-t-shirt?ref=shop_home_active_1
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on September 18, 2018, 10:59:06 AM
https://www.cnet.com/news/emmys-2018-twin-peaks-was-too-good-for-the-awards-anyway/
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: BobFromPikeCreek on September 18, 2018, 11:05:44 AM
If I can find a comically oversized lime green blazer I'm definitely doing Dougie for Halloween. Praying for a thrift shop miracle.

PS I see me bitching about Season 3 earlier in the thread. I was dead wrong, it's incredible.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: BobFromPikeCreek on September 18, 2018, 01:15:22 PM
It was pretty weak of me to tap out after the first ep. It's pretty much the best TV in years every moment after that. The benefit at least was that I got to marathon them all rather than waiting week by week.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: BlueTsunami on September 18, 2018, 01:41:57 PM
It was pretty weak of me to tap out after the first ep. It's pretty much the best TV in years every moment after that. The benefit at least was that I got to marathon them all rather than waiting week by week.

It was a bit like torture waiting week to week but its absolutely made for binging.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on September 24, 2018, 11:30:42 PM
"David, when can we expect Season 4?"

Lynch: (https://i.imgur.com/4pGhQ7J.png)
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on July 28, 2019, 08:20:06 PM
https://www.reddit.com/r/twinpeaks/comments/cj1t20/all_mr_c_is_in_a_loop_and_he_knows_it/

Don't agree with all of this but it's an interesting take...

Getting a big urge to rewatch this.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: pilonv1 on July 29, 2019, 07:14:09 AM
Nearly two years since episode 18 :(
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on July 29, 2019, 09:02:45 AM
Nearly two years since episode 18 :(

Two years closer to season 4 :rejoice
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Don Rumata on July 29, 2019, 02:41:12 PM
Nearly two years since episode 18 :(

Two years closer to season 4 :rejoice
You know damn well Lynch is going to die before then.

Anyway, i'm also itching for a rewatch.
Maybe after i'm done with this Dark show, i'll go ahead.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on July 29, 2019, 02:54:12 PM
Twin Peaks: The Return edited back into 9 episode might be even more compelling. I'm not sure. 45 minutes of Episode 8 can not be cut down - that HAS to exist as it is, as do many other plotlines. And in a year or two I might be shouting accolades for Lynch's 18-hour pièce de résistance.

Interesting to re-read my original thoughts on the series going into a rewatch. Now that I know how things will go down I wonder if the pacing will be as much of an issue (or possibly more of one.)
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Don Rumata on July 29, 2019, 03:06:02 PM
As long as that editing down doesn't remove all the little vignettes that make it what it is (like the guy donating blood to pay rent, etc).
There's more to a story than plot, but it's especially true for something as vague and as ethereal as Lynch's stuff.

Personally i binged it, because i watched Twin Peaks for the first time once Season 3 was all out in the first place, but i was glued to the screen throughout all of Season 3 (concert end credits notwithstanding).
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on July 29, 2019, 03:08:09 PM
As long as that editing down doesn't remove all the little vignettes that make it what it is (like the guy donating blood to pay rent, etc).
There's more to a story than plot, but it's especially true for something as vague and as ethereal as Lynch's stuff.

Yeah and I definitely came around to that view after sitting on the series. But it's a natural reaction to want plotlines wrapped up. The possible mistake is expecting that from Lynch in the first place. :thinking
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on July 29, 2019, 03:10:02 PM
I can't imagine watching an edited-down version. A of Lynch's weirdness is essential.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: TVC15 on July 29, 2019, 07:32:10 PM
Nearly two years since episode 18 :(

Two years closer to season 4 :rejoice
You know damn well Lynch is going to die before then.

Anyway, i'm also itching for a rewatch.
Maybe after i'm done with this Dark show, i'll go ahead.

I've been meaning to start Dark but it didn't really grab me with it's first ten minutes when I first tried to watch it early on, would you recommend it? Cause I've been thinking I could be down for a dark german show that's filmed well.

Watch the first ep of Dark. By then I knew it definitely wasn’t for me.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on July 29, 2019, 08:13:07 PM
Dark is really smart but I find it impossible to care about... any character. It's very nihilistic, which is a strange complaint in a Lynch thread I'll give you.

I enjoyed it overall, but between the language barrier, the family trees, and the criss-crossing timelines, it's a very taxing and demanding show to watch. I haven't mustered up the energy to tackle the bulk of s2 yet either, and when I resume watching it's honestly a coin flip if I rewatch the entire show first just so I have it all fresh in my head.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: toku on July 29, 2019, 09:34:53 PM
Why is that a  strange complaint? Lynch's work has never been nihilistic.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on July 29, 2019, 09:38:05 PM
That's absolutely true. :thinking

I retract that statement.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Don Rumata on July 29, 2019, 10:28:43 PM
I finished season 2 of Dark just today (binged it all in the last week or so) and i liked it.
I don't have a problem with the nihilism you mention, the show is almost completely devoid of any humor, but that shouldn't be a prerequisite i think (or Bergman would be a hack).
Regardless, if you like time travel stories, it's probably one of the best i've seen on the screen, this side of Primer (and significantly less complicated than Primer, lol).
It deals with all the usual plot points you find in all of them, such as time loops and paradox and so on and so forth, but puts them together with enough verosimiltude and breakneck pace to make it fun.

I wasn't really sold on episode 1 so i'd suggest to at least give it 3 or 4 episodes, to let the 50 characters set in your head a bit.
I honestly cemented who was who in which timeline, into season 2, so i guess it's normal to run mental connect-the-dots at first.

Casting director on the show should get a medal though, the way they chose various actors to represent the same character is really well done, as far as likenesses go, almost uncanny at times (i could recognize who they were even before the name drop, despite being a different actor).

Before watching i had seen people comparing it to Twin Peaks, and to be honest, aside from the general theme of parallel timelines, and a small town where everyone has a history/skeleton in the closet with one another, there isn't much else they share.

But it's a really gripping show, and the characters grow on you, even though in season 2 they sort of focus more on a couple of central ones, for better or worse, as the plot grows in scale.

Now that i think about it, in terms of tone, the show reminded me a lot of Les Revenants, only Dark is much better, as i hated that show.  :doge
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Don Rumata on August 13, 2019, 03:40:50 PM
https://www.digitalspy.com/tv/ustv/a860251/twin-peaks-season-4-david-lynch-carrie-page-season-3-finale/

Well, get on it you rube, time knows no mercy!
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on August 13, 2019, 03:47:46 PM
I'd... be down for a season 4 that just focused on Coop and Carrie in the alternate world, with mostly new characters otherwise.

I still want more Audrey content though. It may be my one remaining initial critique of The Return that I think still has merit.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Don Rumata on August 13, 2019, 03:51:00 PM
Yeah i'd be down for that too.
I loved all the new characters in S3, so i'd be down for more.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: toku on August 13, 2019, 04:09:07 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KpPfrsK31o

:tocry
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on August 13, 2019, 04:09:57 PM
Yo I need to watch The Missing Pieces...
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Don Rumata on August 13, 2019, 04:11:50 PM
Yo I need to watch The Missing Pieces...
It's literally 50 minutes of cut scenes one after the other.
some interesting stuff with Bowie, mostly, but it's not really organized into a narrative or anything.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: toku on August 13, 2019, 06:35:25 PM
https://twitter.com/BradleyjKornish/status/1154007021999382528
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: BlueTsunami on August 27, 2019, 11:40:15 PM
https://www.digitalspy.com/tv/ustv/a860251/twin-peaks-season-4-david-lynch-carrie-page-season-3-finale/

Well, get on it you rube, time knows no mercy!

I mean how poetic would that be, to have a true final season that had Carrie Page on screen for most of it? I'd be so down for a dark ass Coop and Laura 'Sliders'.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: agrajag on August 28, 2019, 09:01:56 AM
David Lynch supports the most non-Lynchian candidate for president, Tim Ryan
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: toku on October 05, 2019, 01:14:24 PM
https://www.instagram.com/p/B3DdOqFllAJ/

seem to be a lot of rumors/hear say going around that we might be getting more Twin Peaks

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ijcTx6vBoJw
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Don Rumata on October 05, 2019, 03:10:02 PM
Hopefully it's true and it gets fast tracked
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: chronovore on November 28, 2020, 12:54:19 AM
https://welcometotwinpeaks.com/news/david-lynch-wisteria-netflix-series-2021/
Quote
What’s On Netflix today spotted the mention of an Untitled David Lynch Project (Working Title: Wisteria) in issue 1222 of Production Weekly. The listing mentions that shooting is set to start in May 2021 and that some of it will take place at Calvert Studios, which is where Rancho Rosa shot parts for Twin Peaks: The Return. The new series is written by David Lynch and he will direct with Sabrina S. Sutherland as the producer.

David Lynch has been rumored to be in talks with Netflix about a new project ever since he was spotted grabbing coffee in the Netflix lobby back in 2018. The surprise release of What Did Jack Do? at the start of 2020 put those rumors to rest only temporarily, because a casting call for ‘the lead of the new David Lynch film’ popped up on Recapped.com a month later. David Lynch was said to be looking for an actress with dark hair in her mid-to-late 20s and ‘tasteful nudity’ was required. The same source later clarified it was actually a limited series for ‘a very popular streaming service’ and that the actress was to be in her 30s instead.

Started here, apparently:
http://twitter.com/ThatsOurWaldo/status/1012358532195344385
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Skullfuckers Anonymous on February 14, 2021, 05:46:03 PM
https://mobile.twitter.com/fatecolossal/status/1360980695850565636
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: chronovore on February 16, 2021, 12:30:26 AM
I finished watching the first two seasons of the show again for the first time in many years, and then watched fire walk with me about a week later. I don’t think I had seen the movie since its theatrical run. I remember not being fond of the movie, and feeling that the entire thing was too abstract and forced to feel random. I really enjoyed it this time. It felt deeply connected with the TV show, where my previous viewing had had a much longer than one week gap. There was no easy way to watch TV shows as a run up at that time.

Friend of mine has sent me a fan edit of FWWM and additional footage from “the missing pieces“ (discarded footage from FWWM’s filming) so I will be watching that. The same friend disliked season three though, so I might sidestep that.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on February 16, 2021, 12:47:33 AM
Don't deprive yourself of content. Experience it yourself and come to your own conclusion.

If my opinion means anything, while The Return is practically a different show (though following on logically from FWWM, IMO), it's possibly my favorite Lynch work. Hard to top Mullholland but there's a lot to appreciate with The Return...
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Don Rumata on February 16, 2021, 04:58:40 AM
Fan edits...  :nope

Id watch missing pieces on its own, and then jump into S3, which is amazing.  :thinking
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on June 26, 2022, 08:04:57 PM
Trent Reznor On TWIN PEAKS: THE RETURN PART 8, Five Years Later (https://www.fangoria.com/original/trent-reznor-on-twin-peaks-the-return-part-8-five-years-later/)

Quote
So, the night David Lynch shows up, we're in my studio, which was in uptown New Orleans, on Magazine Street. It's kind of a residential area. Well, it was also foggy that night, so we went to wait outside because we knew he was headed there. I guess he was driven and dropped off, because he suddenly emerges from the fog and – at that exact moment, from down a side street – two completely naked dudes also come walking out of the fog (laughs). It wasn't planned, just one of those random New Orleans experiences. I'll never forget the look on [Lynch's] face, like, "What the fuck is going on here?"
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on August 29, 2022, 04:56:14 PM
Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me at 30: David Lynch’s underrated masterwork (https://www.theguardian.com/film/2022/aug/28/twin-peaks-fire-walk-with-me-at-30-david-lynchs-underrated-masterwork?CMP=share_btn_tw)

I can't say whether The Return topped it, but it's at least a conversation.
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on December 12, 2022, 05:35:56 PM
https://twitter.com/MovingImageNYC/status/1602405406298497024

https://twitter.com/mon_coss/status/1602409581476515859
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on January 16, 2023, 02:55:00 PM
https://twitter.com/jeffzoldy/status/1612893133389369378

https://twitter.com/ThatsOurWaldo/status/1611773582882791424

https://twitter.com/DuganAmanda/status/1613493876089655297
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Tasty on January 31, 2023, 07:26:11 PM
https://twitter.com/PkItVhUAtj2teDL/status/1617245226409816064

https://twitter.com/choppingwoodpod/status/1617058007359295489
Title: Re: Twin Peaks OT: I'll see you again in 25 years.
Post by: Joe Molotov on January 31, 2023, 08:45:05 PM
https://www.worldofreel.com/blog/ixb1u550vxs724qi0qkpm968a3txxb

Sight & Sound named Twin Peaks: The Return one of the Top 150 movies of all-time.