Author Topic: Olbermann sez: "Beginning of the end of America" and also we all LOL at PD! (Read 20494 times)

LiuKangBakingAPie · « **Reply #60 on:** October 19, 2006, 02:05:27 PM »

Quote from: Phoenix Dark on October 19, 2006, 02:03:32 PM

Closed minded? Where am I being closed minded? Last time I checked, not one person has challenged any of my assertions or answered my question. Why is it ok for Olbermann to demonstrate a clear liberal bias, but it's not ok for conservative TV journalists to do the same? Shouldn't we expect them all to be...fair and balanced?

No one intelligent has ever said O'Reilly isn't a good journalist or talking head for speaking his Republican rhetoric. They simply just think his thoughts are stupid. He's allowed to say whatever he wants, but it doesn't make him exempt from criticism on his wacky thoughts.

Van Cruncheon · « **Reply #61 on:** October 19, 2006, 02:05:47 PM »

PD, when has ANYONE -- ANYONE YOU ILLITERATE FAT FUCK -- argued that conservative pundits don't have a right to express their opinion on TV? Last I checked, our complaints were with their lack of facts and fear-mongering, not their right to address us from a prominent public platform.

GET YOUR PECKER OUT OF THAT STRAW MAN

LiuKangBakingAPie · « **Reply #62 on:** October 19, 2006, 02:06:53 PM »

Quote from: Phoenix Dark on October 19, 2006, 02:04:16 PM

Like O'Reilly?

I would like for you to show me somewhere where it was stated by an intelligent person that O'Reilly should not have his own TV show because he's promoting a Republican viewpoint. His viewpoint is his own, he's allowed to express it, and we're allowed to not watch it if we choose. Criticisms of O'Reilly have been against how stupid his thoughts can be, not the fact that he has an avenue to express them to the public.

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #63 on:** October 19, 2006, 02:07:00 PM »

Quote from: Willco on October 19, 2006, 02:04:41 PM

Olbermann is exactly like O'Reilly in terms of his job, but not his ideals. Neither are news anchors.

So would be correct to say that there shouldn't be any complaining about the bias O'Reilly shows, or Hannity, or whoever?

MAF: Now that I've explained my position, does it make more sense?

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #64 on:** October 19, 2006, 02:07:55 PM »

Quote from: LiuKangBakingAPie on October 19, 2006, 02:06:53 PM

Quote from: Phoenix Dark on October 19, 2006, 02:04:16 PM
Like O'Reilly?
I would like for you to show me somewhere where it was stated by an intelligent person that O'Reilly should not have his own TV show because he's promoting a Republican viewpoint. His viewpoint is his own, he's allowed to express it, and we're allowed to not watch it if we choose. Criticisms of O'Reilly have been against how stupid his thoughts can be, not the fact that he has an avenue to express them to the public.

Perhaps I hang around at far left boards/blogs too much, because I've heard people say that. In real life as well.

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #65 on:** October 19, 2006, 02:09:36 PM »

Quote from: Phoenix Dark on October 19, 2006, 02:07:00 PM

So would be correct to say that there shouldn't be any complaining about the bias O'Reilly shows, or Hannity, or whoever?

No. Why shouldn't people be able to complain? They're voicing their opinions, people can voice their opinions too.

MrAngryFace · « **Reply #66 on:** October 19, 2006, 02:10:20 PM »

PD:

Unfortunately you've authored so much crap on this forum the moment of redemption in MY eyes has long since passed. Nowadays every time you speak I am treated to a chorus of farts -- and sometimes whistles if you stumble on an idea someone throws at you.

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #67 on:** October 19, 2006, 02:12:14 PM »

Quote from: Willco on October 19, 2006, 02:09:36 PM

Quote from: Phoenix Dark on October 19, 2006, 02:07:00 PM
So would be correct to say that there shouldn't be any complaining about the bias O'Reilly shows, or Hannity, or whoever?

No. Why shouldn't people be able to complain? They're voicing their opinions, people can voice their opinions too.

True.

MAF: Yeah, right. You've contributed your fair share of shit to the internet as well

Van Cruncheon · « **Reply #68 on:** October 19, 2006, 02:13:22 PM »

why the fuck would you hang out at fringe blogs outside of the occasional lolz

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #69 on:** October 19, 2006, 02:14:23 PM »

Is the GAFCRITIC blog still around? That was pretty great.

MrAngryFace · « **Reply #70 on:** October 19, 2006, 02:14:32 PM »

Phoenix: What did you mean by:

ZBBBBBBBBBBBTTTTTTTTTTPBBBBBB!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! BTHLLLLLLLLLLLLLZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ!!!!!!!! ?

Van Cruncheon · « **Reply #71 on:** October 19, 2006, 02:15:28 PM »

http://gafcritic.blogspot.com

run by one of the few folks blessedly banned from this forum, IronKnuckle

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #72 on:** October 19, 2006, 02:16:18 PM »

Quote from: Drinky Crow on October 19, 2006, 02:13:22 PM

why the fuck would you hang out at fringe blogs outside of the occasional lolz

I used to be pretty far left. I'd hang around on this board:
http://forums.therandirhodesshow.com/

After I became sick of the far left, I continued to hang around there since I had friends there. But now all I do is debate and get called a conservatroll lol

LiuKangBakingAPie · « **Reply #73 on:** October 19, 2006, 02:17:28 PM »

Quote from: Phoenix Dark on October 19, 2006, 02:07:55 PM

Perhaps I hang around at far left boards/blogs too much, because I've heard people say that. In real life as well.

They're just exaggerations or rantings of obviously annoyed people. Normal people with a clear head will always, always allow anyone the right to say stupid shit. They will never, ever prohibit that person from the right to express those views. The fact that you're allowed to stupid up this thread is evidence enough of that.

"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." -Voltaire

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #74 on:** October 19, 2006, 02:18:31 PM »

Case in point...
http://forums.therandirhodesshow.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=99421&view=findpost&p=1000159

Van Cruncheon · « **Reply #75 on:** October 19, 2006, 02:19:01 PM »

you really need to read blinded by the right, the story of a gay man who spent too much time around the far far moonbat left and got so pissed he became a "hit man" for the right until they fuckin' sold his cigarillo ass out

now he runs media matters, lol

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #76 on:** October 19, 2006, 02:20:24 PM »

Quote from: Drinky Crow on October 19, 2006, 02:19:01 PM

you really need to read blinded by the right, the story of a gay man who spent too much time around the far far moonbat left and got so pissed he became a "hit man" for the right until they fuckin' sold his cigarillo ass out

now he runs media matters, lol

I've heard of that.

I like debating with the far left, perhaps because I know so many far left people. We constantly debate about shit, meh

Flannel Boy · « **Reply #77 on:** October 19, 2006, 02:25:07 PM »

Deleted by user

Cheebs · « **Reply #78 on:** October 19, 2006, 02:45:01 PM »

someone give PD a ronald reagan avatar.

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #79 on:** October 19, 2006, 02:52:03 PM »

Quote from: Cheebs on October 19, 2006, 02:45:01 PM

someone give PD a ronald reagan avatar.

Why? You think I'm a conservative?

ToxicAdam · « **Reply #80 on:** October 19, 2006, 02:55:58 PM »

The problem with internet arguements about politics is that they have zero impact or concerns on what the normal American feels or cares about.

What Keith Olbermann says on his show (which has such a miniscule audience) is such a non-event in these people's worlds, its sad that educated people even obsess about it.

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #81 on:** October 19, 2006, 03:00:24 PM »

Quote from: ToxicAdam on October 19, 2006, 02:55:58 PM

The problem with internet arguements about politics is that they have zero impact or concerns on what the normal American feels or cares about.

What Keith Olbermann says on his show (which has such a miniscule audience) is such a non-event in these people's worlds, its sad that educated people even obsess about it.

E tu ToxicAdam?

No one's obsessing over anything. We're just discussing the issue. Olbermann may have poor ratings, but I find him to be quite interesting

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #82 on:** October 19, 2006, 03:02:13 PM »

Doesn't Olbermann have the highest ratings on MSNBC?

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #83 on:** October 19, 2006, 03:03:22 PM »

Quote from: Willco on October 19, 2006, 03:02:13 PM

Doesn't Olbermann have the highest ratings on MSNBC?

Lolz what does that say about MSNBC :nuhuh

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #84 on:** October 19, 2006, 03:09:31 PM »

I don't think you can really accuse someone of having low ratings, especially as a talking point to paint him as unpopular, when he has the highest ratings on his particular network. He can only go as high as the ceiling.

Furthermore, looking at the ratings, he's ahead of CNN in his timeslot, and ranks ahead of O'Reilly in some demographics.

I don't think he's low rated.

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #85 on:** October 19, 2006, 03:22:19 PM »

Quote from: Willco on October 19, 2006, 03:09:31 PM

I don't think you can really accuse someone of having low ratings, especially as a talking point to paint him as unpopular, when he has the highest ratings on his particular network. He can only go as high as the ceiling.

Furthermore, looking at the ratings, he's ahead of CNN in his timeslot, and ranks ahead of O'Reilly in some demographics.

I don't think he's low rated.

Link? Overall O'Reilly remains ahead of him

Here's some numbers; I'm looking for better ones
http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/ratings/q1_06_msnbcs_olbermann_beats_cnns_zahn_hlns_grace_in_the_demo_34504.asp

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #86 on:** October 19, 2006, 03:28:32 PM »

Do you always talk out of your ass...

Quote from: mediabistro

Wednesday, Oct 04
MSNBC "Must Be Thrilled" By Countdown

MSNBC's Countdown with Keith Olbermann enjoyed one of its highest-rated nights ever on Monday, averaging 834,000 total viewers from 8 to 9pm.

The broadcast topped CNN's Paula Zahn Now in the demo and total viewers last week, and the trend continued on Monday. But more importantly to MSNBC, Countdown averaged 333,000 viewers in the 25-54 demo -- just 65,000 fewer than Bill O'Reilly's 389,000 demo delivery. MSNBC actually beat FNC in the demo between 8:15 and 8:30pm, according to a tipster.

It led an e-mailer ask: "Can anyone remember the last time an MSNBC show rated so high in a normal news period? The folks in Secaucus must be thrilled!"

But Olbermann couldn't build on the high ratings he earned on Monday; he was booked on the Late Show with David Letterman last night...

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #87 on:** October 19, 2006, 03:33:30 PM »

Quote from: Willco on October 19, 2006, 03:28:32 PM

Do you always talk out of your ass...

Quote from: mediabistro
Wednesday, Oct 04
MSNBC "Must Be Thrilled" By Countdown

MSNBC's Countdown with Keith Olbermann enjoyed one of its highest-rated nights ever on Monday, averaging 834,000 total viewers from 8 to 9pm.

The broadcast topped CNN's Paula Zahn Now in the demo and total viewers last week, and the trend continued on Monday. But more importantly to MSNBC, Countdown averaged 333,000 viewers in the 25-54 demo -- just 65,000 fewer than Bill O'Reilly's 389,000 demo delivery. MSNBC actually beat FNC in the demo between 8:15 and 8:30pm, according to a tipster.

It led an e-mailer ask: "Can anyone remember the last time an MSNBC show rated so high in a normal news period? The folks in Secaucus must be thrilled!"

But Olbermann couldn't build on the high ratings he earned on Monday; he was booked on the Late Show with David Letterman last night...

Show me some quarter reports with Olbermann ahead of O'Reilly. lol

Cheebs · « **Reply #88 on:** October 19, 2006, 03:33:38 PM »

I feel Olbermann is our generation's Edward R. Murrow.

Quote from: Phoenix Dark on October 19, 2006, 03:33:30 PM

Show me some quarter reports with Olbermann ahead of O'Reilly. lol

No one ever said he was. He is ahead of CNN though.

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #89 on:** October 19, 2006, 03:34:29 PM »

Quote from: Phoenix Dark on October 19, 2006, 03:33:30 PM

Show me some quarter reports with Olbermann ahead of O'Reilly. lol

I never said he was ahead of O'Reilly, I said he was of O'Reilly in some demos. And I was right. He also is ranked ahead of Zahn now. You lost. Shut up.

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #90 on:** October 19, 2006, 03:36:26 PM »

Quote from: Willco on October 19, 2006, 03:34:29 PM

Quote from: Phoenix Dark on October 19, 2006, 03:33:30 PM
Show me some quarter reports with Olbermann ahead of O'Reilly. lol

I never said he was ahead of O'Reilly, I said he was of O'Reilly in some demos. And I was right. He also is ranked ahead of Zahn now. You lost. Shut up.

No, you lost. You posted a link detailing Olbermann's brilliant ratings for a few days; that's not demographic Willco. Show me some quarter reports.

What an idiot

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #91 on:** October 19, 2006, 03:39:35 PM »

Please, shut up. You lost.

You never win in arguments with me, because you routinely talk out of your ass. It gets to the point where I drown you in so much factual evidence that you're humiliated and admit you're wrong.

I look forward to this happening again.

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #92 on:** October 19, 2006, 03:43:07 PM »

Quote from: Willco on October 19, 2006, 03:39:35 PM

Please, shut up. You lost.

You never win in arguments with me, because you routinely talk out of your ass. It gets to the point where I drown you in so much factual evidence that you're humiliated and admit you're wrong.

I look forward to this happening again.

LOL this is the exact link I posted. Are you even trying anymore?

Willco, read:

Quote

Countdown averaged 164,000 total viewers in the quarter, up 41% from Q1 2005. Zahn averaged 158,000 demo viewers (down 33 percent), according to MSNBC. Bill O'Reilly averaged 450,000 in the demo (down 24 percent).

He beats out Zahn, loses to O'Reilly. So, where are these demos in which Oldermann beats out O'Reilly again? I wouldn't be suprised if he beats him in younger demos considering he's pretty entertaining compared to the old fart that is O'Reilly. But, where are the numbers?

You can't provide quarter reports, and you can't provide demos that prove your point. And you just used the link I provided in the first place. YOU LOSE. What a fucking pussy

Cheebs · « **Reply #93 on:** October 19, 2006, 03:47:29 PM »

Reply, Willco! Reply.

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #94 on:** October 19, 2006, 03:49:59 PM »

Quote from: Cheebs on October 19, 2006, 03:47:29 PM

Reply, Willco! Reply.

He lost, and he exposed himself. Used the EXACT SAME LINK I posted in this thread to prove my point

Which demonstrates he either isn't paying attention or is too stupid to admit defeat

Cheebs · « **Reply #95 on:** October 19, 2006, 03:51:07 PM »

The board says he isn't online anymore.

Wanna talk about Starbuck?

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #96 on:** October 19, 2006, 03:52:41 PM »

Quote from: Cheebs on October 19, 2006, 03:51:07 PM

The board says he isn't online anymore.

Wanna talk about Starbuck?

He ran away. I look forward to him getting back on, and seeing the ownage.

And yes, Starbuck is good looking. Too bad the show looks dumb. I haven't seen it though, so I might check it out...

And oh yeah, The Office comes on tonight right?

Cheebs · « **Reply #97 on:** October 19, 2006, 03:53:45 PM »

Quote from: Phoenix Dark on October 19, 2006, 03:52:41 PM

Quote from: Cheebs on October 19, 2006, 03:51:07 PM
The board says he isn't online anymore.

Wanna talk about Starbuck?

He ran away. I look forward to him getting back on, and seeing the ownage.

And yes, Starbuck is good looking. Too bad the show looks dumb. I haven't seen it though, so I might check it out...

And oh yeah, The Office comes on tonight right?

Yes the office is on tonight. BSG is on sci-fi at 9:00 EST on fridays.

Cheebs, CajoleJuice, Willco (+ 1 Hidden) and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

MrAngryFace · « **Reply #98 on:** October 19, 2006, 03:55:52 PM »

I get all my tv from itunes now lol

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #99 on:** October 19, 2006, 03:58:09 PM »

When I've been wrong, I admitted defeat. Lets see if Willco does the same

MrAngryFace · « **Reply #100 on:** October 19, 2006, 03:59:05 PM »

Quit stinkin up the room PD

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #101 on:** October 19, 2006, 04:00:31 PM »

Some people have to work!

Your original point is that Olbermann is low rated... I show you that he's not and that he is ahead O'Reilly in the demo as of THIS WEEK. Considering he's scored his highest viewership this month, don't you think it's a bit unfair to compare past quarterlies to current ratings?

... By the by, you're still wrong! You called him low rated and he's not. End of story. You lost - as always.

Van Cruncheon · « **Reply #102 on:** October 19, 2006, 04:02:00 PM »

lolz pd owned

ToxicAdam · « **Reply #103 on:** October 19, 2006, 04:02:13 PM »

Katie Couric (who is deemed a miserable failure by media press) recieves almost TEN TIMES the viewers of a Keith Olbermann.

Cable news is only important to political junkies. People who are already set in their ways of viewpoints.

That's why people like O'Reilly and Olbermann are non-stories. They influence no one, because the people that watch them are already set in their opinions.

It's fucking professional wrestling of politics. Pomp and bombast. News presented to be provocative first, informative second. It's junk food ... read a newspaper instead.

--- ---

Wilco, ratings are determined by quarterly reports not weekly. If you wanted to win the debate, you should have shown that Olbermanns ratings have been steadily trending upwords for the past year.

But even that is misleading. It's like saying my cock grew 50% when I added an inch to it.

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #104 on:** October 19, 2006, 04:03:08 PM »

Also, Olbermann's trend is way up, O'Reilly's data has leveled off and dropped in some areas. I'm not saying Olbermann is going to overtake O'Reilly anytime soon, but it's silly to discount Olbermann because he's "low rated".

Cheebs · « **Reply #105 on:** October 19, 2006, 04:03:49 PM »

The real face of news?

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #106 on:** October 19, 2006, 04:03:57 PM »

Quote from: Willco on October 19, 2006, 04:00:31 PM

Some people have to work!

Your original point is that Olbermann is low rated... I show you that he's not and that he is ahead O'Reilly in the demo as of THIS WEEK. Considering he's scored his highest viewership this month, don't you think it's a bit unfair to compare past quarterlies to current ratings?

... By the by, you're still wrong! You called him low rated and he's not. End of story. You lost - as always.

His quarter ratings are low, period. When the new quarter ratings come out, he'll still be behind O'Reilly. Couric's first week on CBS saw huge numbers, only to disappear in the following week.

You claimed Olbermann was ahead of O'Reilly in certain demos, yet you failed to provide any evidence of this. In fact, you used a link that proved you wrong. So you lose. Will you admit that you were wrong on that?

MrAngryFace · « **Reply #107 on:** October 19, 2006, 04:04:13 PM »

My favorite Oreilly quote is when he said 'Ive seen combat'.

I loled so bad.

Cheebs · « **Reply #108 on:** October 19, 2006, 04:06:12 PM »

Quote from: MrAngryFace on October 19, 2006, 04:04:13 PM

My favorite Oreilly quote is when he said 'Ive seen combat'.

I loled so bad.

O'Reilly was better when he was on The Insider.

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #109 on:** October 19, 2006, 04:06:59 PM »

Quote from: ToxicAdam on October 19, 2006, 04:02:13 PM

Katie Couric (who is deemed a miserable failure by media press) recieves almost TEN TIMES the viewers of a Keith Olbermann.

I don't think there's any denying that, but it's not like Olbermann is that bow tie-clad fucker Tucker Carlson.

Quote from: PhoenixDark

You claimed Olbermann was ahead of O'Reilly in certain demos, yet you failed to provide any evidence of this. In fact, you used a link that proved you wrong. So you lose. Will you admit that you were wrong on that?

I claimed Olbermann was ahead of O'Reilly in some demos, and he was, albeit it was this week. In fact, I proved a link that proved me right. You post quarterlies outside of October, his highest month of viewership, because it somehow validates your spin.

You are just trying to spin this, because you've been humiliated in public, once again, for speaking out of your ass and claiming Olbermann is a low rated journalist. Especially considering he ranks ahead of CNN now, you're so wrong about this it's just sad.

The spin your selling is so awful. You should work for O'Reilly.

Cheebs · « **Reply #110 on:** October 19, 2006, 04:08:14 PM »

Quote from: Willco on October 19, 2006, 04:06:59 PM

Quote from: ToxicAdam on October 19, 2006, 04:02:13 PM
Katie Couric (who is deemed a miserable failure by media press) recieves almost TEN TIMES the viewers of a Keith Olbermann.

I don't think there's any denying that, but it's not like Olbermann is that bow tie-clad fucker Tucker Carlson.

He doesn't wear a bow anymore on his show "Tucker".

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #111 on:** October 19, 2006, 04:08:52 PM »

More quarter ratings:
http://www.top5s.com/tvnews.htm

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #112 on:** October 19, 2006, 04:11:11 PM »

Hi, my name is PhoenixDark. I called Olbermann low rated and was proven wrong, and am grasping at straws to keep some resemblance of public credibility after being blasted out of the water. Watch me post past quarterlies when recent evidence proves the contrary, because somehow it validates the only thing I may or may not be right about - and had nothing to do with my original point!

Or as MAF hears it:

FART FART FART

MrAngryFace · « **Reply #113 on:** October 19, 2006, 04:13:01 PM »

Ah, FART FART FART, thanks for clearing that up Willco. I had originally thought PD was going for the point Fart Fart *whistle* Fart.....Fart Fart. I am partly to blame for this misunderstanding.

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #114 on:** October 19, 2006, 04:14:33 PM »

Quote from: Willco on October 19, 2006, 04:06:59 PM

Quote from: ToxicAdam on October 19, 2006, 04:02:13 PM
Katie Couric (who is deemed a miserable failure by media press) recieves almost TEN TIMES the viewers of a Keith Olbermann.

I don't think there's any denying that, but it's not like Olbermann is that bow tie-clad fucker Tucker Carlson.

Quote from: PhoenixDark
You claimed Olbermann was ahead of O'Reilly in certain demos, yet you failed to provide any evidence of this. In fact, you used a link that proved you wrong. So you lose. Will you admit that you were wrong on that?

I claimed Olbermann was ahead of O'Reilly in some demos, and he was, albeit it was this week. In fact, I proved a link that proved me right. You post quarterlies outside of October, his highest month of viewership, because it somehow validates your spin.

You are just trying to spin this, because you've been humiliated in public, once again, for speaking out of your ass and claiming Olbermann is a low rated journalist. Especially considering he ranks ahead of CNN now, you're so wrong about this it's just sad.

The spin your selling is so awful. You should work for O'Reilly.

A week doesn't prove your point and you know it. Ratings aren't determinded by weeks: they are determined by quarters. And according to the latest ones, O'Reilly is ahead of your boy. In fact both the links you posted show O'Reilly ahead of Olbermann. You have no point, at all. And your such a pussy that you won't admit it.

If anyone is grasping at straws, it's you. I'll recede on my previous statement that Olbermann was a low rated journalist. His ratings are lower than O'Reilly's though, as well as many of the other big hitters. Your point?

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #115 on:** October 19, 2006, 04:15:07 PM »

After the past couple of laughable debates with me, PhoenixDark has been so thoroughly raped in public that when he farts now, it just makes a "WHOOooo!" noise.

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #116 on:** October 19, 2006, 04:17:16 PM »

Quote

The broadcast topped CNN's Paula Zahn Now in the demo and total viewers last week, and the trend continued on Monday. But more importantly to MSNBC, Countdown averaged 333,000 viewers in the 25-54 demo -- just 65,000 fewer than Bill O'Reilly's 389,000 demo delivered. MSNBC actually beat FNC in the demo between 8:15 and 8:30pm, according to a tipster.

Haha what a loser

The Fake Shemp · « **Reply #117 on:** October 19, 2006, 04:18:07 PM »

Quote from: Phoenix Dark on October 19, 2006, 04:14:33 PM

FART FART FART WHISTLE FART SLURP-FART GASIOUS FART FARTY FART FART

PROPERLY PLACED EMOTICON TO MAKE ME FEEL SUPERIOR IN LIGHT OF PUBLIC INADEQUACY

TRANSLATION:

I WILL NOT CONCEDE THAT I AM COMPLETELY WRONG, BECAUSE AS YOU CAN SEE BY FART LANGUAGE, I AM USED TO TALKING OUT OF MY BUM AND GETTING AWAY WITH. I WAS POSSIBLY, HALF-WRONG. THAT'S ALL I'LL ADMIT.

END MESSAGE.

p.s. i was wrong about olbermann but i still stroke o'reilly's balls at night oh yeah

Van Cruncheon · « **Reply #118 on:** October 19, 2006, 04:23:03 PM »

i bet pd has jerked his nubbin to reba

Phoenix Dark · « **Reply #119 on:** October 19, 2006, 04:23:16 PM »

Editing my post doesn't change the fact that O'Reilly beat Olbermann in that demo

8:15-8:30pm, you've got to be shitting me

News:

Author Topic: Olbermann sez: "Beginning of the end of America" and also we all LOL at PD! (Read 20494 times)