Because I would like to know more information to have an opinion on something makes me arrogant? WTF? Christianity doesn't have anything to do with that, BTW. And isn't this the same argument thats been going on the past several years with the Iraq War? "Let's not be arrogant here, Iraq has WMD's, no need to wait for evidence. Fuck em, lets invade that shit."
you need an opinion based on facts and info to make up your mind about the other side? Why not apply that to christianity? :baffle.
no , this is not the same as Iraq at all - that's just using a completely unrelated analogy to try and pain doubt on something there is actual -evidence- for. Do not mix SCIENCE with POLITICS.
note : i was raised a roman catholic, in a strong irish catholic family. I was left to my own devices to figure all this out, but having a good education and a grounding in science makes believing in the Catholic God very very unlikely. I'm open to the idea of some sort of supreme conciousness or whatever, but MANMADE attempts to put this into some sort of packagable religion are, quite frankly, laughable.
Can you give me any evidence to the contrary as to why catholicism shouldn't be laughed out of existance?
and if you mention morality collapsing if there is no ultimate punishment, i will reach through the internet and shit on your face.
Well, a good part of it is on faith. Maybe I don't have a darn reason or proof to believe this way, but I think there's probably an afterlife for those who look for it. More than that, I think the Bible is a pretty good book on parables with meanings on just about everything. Not that I go to it often and read it, but there's some pretty good lessons in it.
pretty good lessons != there is a god.
Yeah sorry - if I don't think there's a simple answer to you know, the biggest question in the history of civilization. Not only that, but be arrogant about it, when I don't have a reason to.
As for Catholism, maybe you're right - there could be any religion founded. So go found one, see how successful it is. All I know is there was a nice set of "coincidences" that lined up in the Abrahamic tradition that pushed this all through. Maybe these beliefs came out of thin air and everyone just started to believe and they did. Not everyone believed in this afterlife thing you know? The prevailing belief was you goto a land of the dead (can't remember the name, it escapes me.) It must have took a hell of a salesman to push this belief against the grain of what was going on at the time.
As for Jesus, maybe its one big joke - maybe the guy was just killed and that was it. But I find it odd that during those teams there were tons of revolutionary messianic sects, and *this* one just happened to survive. Why would the disciples go spread this after the leader died? Yet, how did this line religion survive years of persecution? I doubt "Laughter" is going to push the Christian religion out of existence when years of persecution from the Roman Empire and other hierarchies couldn't.
Maybe there's no reason to believe it, but it sure doesn't seem to be too bad to be on a side as resilient as that. It could have been crushed or a rejected belief like probably thousands of small cults back then and wasn't.