Author Topic: Movie News, Reviews, and Discussion Super-Thread  (Read 2639039 times)

naff and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #16980 on: March 08, 2013, 02:19:13 AM »
Isn't Palpatine creating a really powerful Jedi in the hopes that he'll turn him bad ~20 years down the road the most convoluted, abstruse plan?  Also he already had another Sith helper at that point and there can only be two (like a double Highlander sort of deal)?

"Well, just in case this one dies, I'd better create a new really powerful Jedi to replace him.  Hopefully I'll be able to manipulate this one, though, cause otherwise I'd be creating a Messiah-level Force user who will be trained from childhood by my enemies.  Eh, I'll work the kinks out later."

It's almost like this wasn't all meticulously planned from the beginning by a thoughtful, skilled author!

010

Mandark

  • Icon
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #16981 on: March 08, 2013, 02:43:27 AM »
Obama is Anakin

Bin Laden is Palpatine

Melanin is Midichlorians

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #16982 on: March 08, 2013, 03:00:23 AM »
Bill Ayers: Saul Alinsky was a powerful Chicagoan. He was so powerful and wise he could retroactively change baby birth announcements in newspapers to create...US citizenship.
010

Cindi Mayweather

  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #16983 on: March 08, 2013, 03:07:39 AM »
But didn't Anakin have all the midicholorians and shit before he ever met Palpatine? Or is the hot new theory that Palpatine used the force to get Anakin's mom preggers?

Anakin's mom in Ep1 said that there was no father and Qui-Gon told the Jedi council that he was conceived by the Force. Episode III explained that Palpatine manipulated the Force to create him.

Ahahahahhaha
weed

Cormacaroni

  • Poster of the Forever
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #16984 on: March 08, 2013, 03:09:59 AM »
I guess that means that Luke can do the same, start a whole Force-breeding Jedi franchise

YOU CAN HAVE THAT ONE FOR FREE DISNEY
vjj

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #16985 on: March 08, 2013, 08:59:11 AM »
chrono doing Cormac a solid by pasting a rant long enough for the gif.  What a mensch.

:lol
I literally googled "lengthy midichlorian essay," and this was the first hit. The true irony is that I haven't read the essay either. Like Himu, I just needed something big in a hurry.

The secondary irony is that the GIF has exceeded its bandwidth.

Cormacaroni

  • Poster of the Forever
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #16986 on: March 08, 2013, 09:09:19 AM »
that was pretty awesome google fu but the killer combo would probably have been 'midichlorian rant' and 'tl;dr'
vjj

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #16987 on: March 09, 2013, 12:15:04 PM »
I guess that means that Luke can do the same, start a whole Force-breeding Jedi franchise

YOU CAN HAVE THAT ONE FOR FREE DISNEY
Cant have Luke going around force raping in a Disney movie

Cindi Mayweather

  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #16988 on: March 09, 2013, 12:25:31 PM »
chrono doing Cormac a solid by pasting a rant long enough for the gif.  What a mensch.

:lol
I literally googled "lengthy midichlorian essay," and this was the first hit. The true irony is that I haven't read the essay either. Like Himu, I just needed something big in a hurry.

The secondary irony is that the GIF has exceeded its bandwidth.

 :lol
weed

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #16989 on: March 09, 2013, 12:32:12 PM »
This is all probably just leading up to another retcon into the original movies, where Palpatine says "Luke, I am your pop-pop!"

I mean... Technically... yeah, he is.

But didn't Anakin have all the midicholorians and shit before he ever met Palpatine? Or is the hot new theory that Palpatine used the force to get Anakin's mom preggers?

What theory?  This is explicitly what happened. 

In the novelization Palps just comes out and says it.  I guess they either cut that scene from the finished product or they cut it from the script before they filmed it... honestly it's better for Palps to do it the way he does it in RotS, in the opera house... the audience knows, Anakin doesn't, and as far as we know, as Vader, he never learned the truth.  It seems kind of fitting for the entire purpose of his existence is to be the Emperor's patsy.

Do I like this particular plot element?  Well, yes and no.  By that I mean that of the two options, I'd rather Anakin be a Sith alchemy experiment than simply be Space Jesus; it fixes one of the more annoying plot elements mentioned in The Phantom Menace.  It does create a shit-ton of illogical, unanswerable questions, though. 

Sure, I have no problem thinking that someone with the resources and force powers of Palpatine could have abducted Shmi and done... well whatever it is he would need to do, probably a lot of glaring and waving his hands and cackling was involved... buuuut. 

On a more fundamental level, well, creation isn't really the Dark Side's thing.  In the lore / EU, they do all sorts of mutations and abominations... and yeah, Palpatine is pretty obsessed with cloning, especially himself, and thus having a version of himself ruling forever.  In a sense, Anakin's unnaturally high power level is just that, though, unnatural.  A non-force sensitive slave girl is not just going to spontaneously have the universe's alpha force user. 

Mandark hit on why this DOESN"T logically work very well, too.  It's not good writing for the intended Xanatos Gambit to work just because it has to, for it to thematically fit and for the audience to dig it, it actually needs to be clever and fit the details given so far.

 Creating the kid using some nobody slave with the name Skywalker on some nowhere backwoods planet where the Jedi would never find him?  Sure, makes sense.  Leaving him with his mother unattended, let alone leaving her alive to tell other people, without creating your own little hidden enclave under the middle of the Dune Sea, or hell, taking him to some nowhere planet in the Unknown Region where there would be zero chance of a random Jedi wandering around to buy some parts, in order to train this little monster of yours from birth to be a badass Sith death machine?  Why, it bottles the mind.

At best, we can only regard Palpatine's plan as to just leave the kid out there as insurance or maybe he planned to scoop him up later when he finally manifested force powers.  Seems pretty lazy as plans go, and Tatooine's a dangerous place.  The kid had a fucking bomb collar on him at all times for crying out loud.  Wait too long for some minor dark-side fueled teenage rebellion and the Hutts make him go boom.  The only way this works is if Palpatine's ability to predict the future was so ironclad perfect that he knew in advance exactly what would happen all the time.

In which case, Return of the Jedi no longer makes sense.  Or hell, Revenge of the Sith.  Having his super-apprentice get turned into swiss cheese was obviously not part of the plan.

It's been a while since I've seen Episode III, but I thought the whole bit with Darth Plagueis was to tell Anakin that Palpatine could give him power over life and death if he turned Sith, that he could keep Padme from dying. Lucas isn't exactly a master of subtlety; I think if he had intended for Palpatine to be Anakin's dad, he would have just said it. Remember when Luke found out who his father was? Yeah. It wasn't some super-secret, read between the lines moment.
©@©™

AdmiralViscen

  • Murdered in the digital realm
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #16990 on: March 09, 2013, 02:19:05 PM »
Isn't Palpatine creating a really powerful Jedi in the hopes that he'll turn him bad ~20 years down the road the most convoluted, abstruse plan?  Also he already had another Sith helper at that point and there can only be two (like a double Highlander sort of deal)?

"Well, just in case this one dies, I'd better create a new really powerful Jedi to replace him.  Hopefully I'll be able to manipulate this one, though, cause otherwise I'd be creating a Messiah-level Force user who will be trained from childhood by my enemies.  Eh, I'll work the kinks out later."

It's almost like this wasn't all meticulously planned from the beginning by a thoughtful, skilled author!

Yea, this shit is distinguished mentally-challenged. Palpatine took no role in Anakin getting discovered by anyone, and you'd think he'd just go claim him himself before he was too old to be trained.

Steve Contra

  • Bought a lemon tree straight cash
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #16991 on: March 09, 2013, 02:33:41 PM »
The fuck is this shit
vin

Dickie Dee

  • It's not the band I hate, it's their fans.
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #16992 on: March 09, 2013, 02:50:12 PM »
Let's let JJ cleanse the palette

___

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #16993 on: March 09, 2013, 03:56:48 PM »
dog

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #16994 on: March 09, 2013, 04:20:02 PM »
The whole thing about Anakin's parentage is so stupid, illogical, and convoluted, nevermind that it's incredibly underdeveloped for what is [if true] a central pillar of a six-movie series. If Palpatine is the father of Anakin and the grandfather of Luke, and the mastermind of every single event across six movies, then that definitely deserves more mention than a single line that was simultaneously focused on a separate matter [Anakin's desire to keep Padme from dying].

Never mind that this power is never once mentioned anywhere else across six movies. It's not suggested, it's not hinted at, it's not mentioned, it's not explicitly stated. We all know by know that George Lucas [and Star Wars] doesn't have an ounce of subtlety. Nor is this power ever explicitly shown even a single time in six movies. We never see the power being used to create life, we never even see it being used to save someone's life. The only reason we know the power exists is because it was told to us [and Anakin] by a master manipulator whose whole stick is to lie and deceive everyone he comes into contact with. For all we know, that whole thing was another Palpatine lie to bring Anakin further under his control and that Anakin actually had a really ordinary father that his mother didn't want to talk about. And please don't bring the Expanded Universe into this.

Quote
For whatever reason - I'm going to guess on the advice of others - he either didn't film or edited out the scene he wrote in which Sidious directly confesses to Anakin that he made him.

This idea is hopelessly absurd. We know by now that the contents of the PT were fully under the control of Lucas and nothing happened that he didn't sign off on. Who, exactly, convinced him not to use that scene? Who stepped forward, for the one and only time, to say "No." to the billionaire who created this franchise, owns it completely and utterly, who produce/directed/wrote this turkey and owns the production company and special effects house? No one, because that person doesn't exist. If he wanted that scene in there, it'd be in there, and I honestly can't think of a single person who could have convinced him to cut it [maybe Spielberg lol], not in light of all the incredibly awful stuff that Lucas pushed through across three movies.
dog

Yeti

  • Hail Hydra
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #16995 on: March 09, 2013, 04:50:33 PM »
someone change this thread title to "The Midichlorian News Topic"
WDW

Cormacaroni

  • Poster of the Forever
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #16996 on: March 09, 2013, 08:11:30 PM »
My work here is done
vjj

Kim Kardashians Butt

  • Junior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #16997 on: March 09, 2013, 08:12:38 PM »
And this is why Star Wars movies should have stayed dead. I guess they were always going to get made regardless.

To be fair, JJ can make a great sci-fi film. It's just that the studio doesn't want traditional trek. JJ's Trek is practically Star Wars anyways.

recursivelyenumerable

  • you might think that; I couldn't possibly comment
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #16998 on: March 09, 2013, 08:31:08 PM »
I liked the midichlorian thing because it made Star Wars, which I was never really into, seem a bit more reminiscent of the 70s/80s/90s fantasy books I used to read which would often have elaborately conceived magic systems involving thinly veiled analogs of whatever scientific concepts were making the pop science / New Age rounds at the time.
QED

Diunx

  • Humble motherfucker with a big-ass dick
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #16999 on: March 09, 2013, 09:47:41 PM »
This next few years are gonna be awful

:piss Star Wars :piss2
Drunk

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #17000 on: March 10, 2013, 09:18:11 AM »
Let's let JJ cleanse the palette


fuck this earth

Kim Kardashians Butt

  • Junior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #17001 on: March 10, 2013, 09:38:50 AM »
And this is why Star Wars movies should have stayed dead. I guess they were always going to get made regardless.

To be fair, JJ can make a great sci-fi film. It's just that the studio doesn't want traditional trek. JJ's Trek is practically Star Wars anyways.

I wasn't talking about the Star Trek trailer, just this whole discussion in general. As for JJ, I love Super 8 but dislike everything else completely. I really liked Cloverfield too but he only produced that. Fuck Lost, Alias and everything else.

Welllll, you are going in with the assumption that the director does the entire film! While the director is definitely a crucial staff member of the production, they clearly have a talented team under their belt that could make it work! JJ is great when confined to a box (ie. Super 8) or has supervision.

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #17002 on: March 10, 2013, 12:38:03 PM »
Welllll, you are going in with the assumption that the director does the entire film! While the director is definitely a crucial staff member of the production, they clearly have a talented team under their belt that could make it work! JJ is great when confined to a box (ie. Super 8) or has supervision.

Except it's written by Orci, Kurtzman, and Lindelof, three of my least favorite writers in Hollywood. But I'll end up watching it anyway, because whatever.
dog

Kim Kardashians Butt

  • Junior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #17003 on: March 10, 2013, 01:18:40 PM »
I thought they got Bird?

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #17004 on: March 10, 2013, 02:32:42 PM »
I thought they got Bird?

Michael Arndt is writing Episode 7, I was talking about the new Star Trek.
dog

Rahxephon91

  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #17005 on: March 10, 2013, 02:50:33 PM »
Let's let JJ cleanse the palette


Yes, in JJ we trust.

Kim Kardashians Butt

  • Junior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #17006 on: March 10, 2013, 03:00:00 PM »
I thought they got Bird?

Michael Arndt is writing Episode 7, I was talking about the new Star Trek.

Oh! I am losing track of the discussion! You guys move too fast!

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #17007 on: March 11, 2013, 08:50:46 AM »
Room 237
Starts out as good.  Talks about the visual trickery and subtext that Kubrick liked to use including a lot of stuff from that spatial awareness video on The Shining that's on youtube.  But then it really starts reaching and goes full on conspiracy theory.  Then the movie just became reminiscent of douchebag college fodder like What the bleep do we know? type shit.

BobFromPikeCreek

  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #17008 on: March 11, 2013, 02:15:28 PM »
Skyfall  :gladbron

Wreck it Ralph  :ehh

Dredd  :whoo

MacGruber  :trash
zzzzz

Beezy

  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #17009 on: March 11, 2013, 02:58:36 PM »
I like your review style

Verdigris Murder

  • #metoo
  • Senior Member
The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #17010 on: March 11, 2013, 06:00:14 PM »
I really want to see Life of Pi, but the fact that Ang Lee directs it just worries me about his Asian influences on the Asian influences of the book, and I really fucking hope that there's at least a bit of Kung fu.
:{]

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #17011 on: March 11, 2013, 06:05:27 PM »
I really want to see Life of Pi, but the fact that Ang Lee directs it just worries me about his Asian influences on the Asian influences of the book, and I really fucking hope that there's at least a bit of Kung fu.

The entire story is actually an allegory for the invention of the Tiger Fist fighting style.
©@©™

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #17012 on: March 11, 2013, 07:26:05 PM »
Disney's Tim Burton's Alice in Wonderland Kind of Based on Lewis Carroll, But Not Really: Visually wonderful, except for Crispin Glover's poorly weighted humanoid animation. The lead actress is charming. I'm discovering that I don't like movies which have BOTH Helena Bonham Carter AND Johnny Depp in them. Everything else is poorly paced mess. Movie is almost worth watching for the Jabberwocky's few lines of dialog.

Source Code: This reminded me quite a bit of 12 Monkeys, but slightly less completely dark in its outlook. I like Jake Glylleenlylyhal, I think. He's quite watchable. His character, Colter's progression from beginning to end is natural and believable. The villain looked quite a bit like a good friend, who is also something of a mad genius, so that was... uncomfortable.

EDIT: Forgot to mention that the villain in Source Code looks a lot like Sho Nuff, who is also very smart, so I've reported both him and 17-Bit Studios to the DHS.

Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines: Aside from the T-X inexplicably being able to create remote control functionality in police cars and fire engines, I liked this movie quite a bit. It is at least true to The Terminator and T2, unlike Terminator 4, which was just utter crap.  I liked Nick Stahl in Carnivâle, but he appears to be playing more or less the same character here. Claire Danes does alright, and I've always thought Arnie is at his best when playing an emotionless machine with a faulty speech processor. Fantastic ending to the film. For me, I should probably consider it the end of the series.
« Last Edit: March 12, 2013, 01:30:20 AM by chronovore »

Verdigris Murder

  • #metoo
  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #17013 on: March 12, 2013, 03:37:35 AM »
I really want to see Life of Pi, but the fact that Ang Lee directs it just worries me about his Asian influences on the Asian influences of the book, and I really fucking hope that there's at least a bit of Kung fu.

The entire story is actually an allegory for the invention of the Tiger Fist fighting style.
:drudge :ohhh :ohhh :ohhh :ohhh :superman :drudge
:{]

Cerveza mas fina

  • I don't care for Islam tbqh
  • filler
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #17014 on: March 12, 2013, 05:47:57 AM »
Disney's Tim Burton's Alice in Wonderland Kind of Based on Lewis Carroll, But Not Really: Visually wonderful, except for Crispin Glover's poorly weighted humanoid animation. The lead actress is charming. I'm discovering that I don't like movies which have BOTH Helena Bonham Carter AND Johnny Depp in them. Everything else is poorly paced mess. Movie is almost worth watching for the Jabberwocky's few lines of dialog.

Carter, Bonham and Depp are stuck making the same movie over and over for a long long time. I can't make myself watch anything from them anymore although I loved all of them in their time.

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #17015 on: March 12, 2013, 06:11:38 AM »
So you're saying Helena has MPD...

Cerveza mas fina

  • I don't care for Islam tbqh
  • filler
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #17016 on: March 12, 2013, 07:36:05 AM »
Fuck I mean Burton  :lol

It's all the same person anyway!

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #17017 on: March 12, 2013, 08:20:46 AM »
They are the Cerberus of manic-pixie filmmaking.

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #17018 on: March 12, 2013, 09:12:56 PM »
Watched Green Zone last night.

Someone here, I think, said it was Matt Damon being Jason Bourne but without the spy stuff. That's pretty far off the mark. Sure, there's plenty of action, and more shaky-cam than I'd like, and there are a few scenes of people in tiny cars being chased and shot at in far-off lands... but the love story between Damon and Kilborne is entirely undeveloped, and the corrupt officials do not sit on the end of righteous anger by the end of the film.

In seriousness, Greengrass brings enough of a different sensibility to the visuals that I didn't feel like I was watching a Bourne flick. I was impressed with the clarity with which a complex story and situation was conveyed, without an excess of unnatural exposition. It is hard to know for whom to root or cheer, as we realize that even maintaining stability requires cooperating with oppressive monsters.

Great movie, entertaining and suspenseful from start to finish, ultimately a little depressing.

etiolate

  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #17019 on: March 12, 2013, 09:38:48 PM »
I do love pastel Burton more than Hot Topic Burton. Even Edward Scissorhands is really one of his pastel movies despite creating the genesis of the Burton Goth Empire.

ManaByte

  • I must hurry back to my comic book store, where I dispense the insults rather than absorb them.
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #17020 on: March 13, 2013, 01:41:24 PM »
GAME ON COCKSUCKERS!
CBG

G The Resurrected

  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #17021 on: March 13, 2013, 02:17:27 PM »


Found one NICE!
« Last Edit: March 13, 2013, 02:21:53 PM by G The Resurrected »

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #17022 on: March 13, 2013, 10:29:30 PM »
Watch this Iron Man movie instead:

dog

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #17023 on: March 15, 2013, 12:06:08 AM »
I agree that Scissorhands is of the "pastel" era -- it was the transitional moment though. Pee Wee's Big Adventure was great.

I love, love, love Nightmare Before Christmas, but it is down to stuff which Burton does not appear to directly affect: Danny Elfman making a musical, and the character designs and animation from Selick.

Decided to grab two Marvel movies.

Captain America, surprisingly, did not need to be seen on the big screen to be enjoyed. I'd watched it on a plane, and assumed it would be even better with the sound up and splashed across a wall. It was still good, plenty of fun, altogether fluffy; worth a second viewing, but not likely to enjoy a third.

The Punisher with Tom Jane. This movie didn't know what it wanted to be. It's a superhero movie from a comic based on exploitation revenge flicks. Why not just make a revenge flick, instead of trying to figure out how to cram comic sensibilities into it? It is poorly paced, and lacks sufficient visceral thrills, and tries for humor in strange places.

I had much more fun re-watching Dirty Laundry immediately afterward, for a real fix of Punisher-like action.


Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #17024 on: March 15, 2013, 12:25:21 AM »
Burton didn't direct Nightmare Before Christmas. He directed Corpse Bride. Tells you all you need to know.

I love Edward Scissorhands. In hindsight I gravitated to Burton's films a lot as a kid in part because they didn't look like anything I had seen before.
010

Cerveza mas fina

  • I don't care for Islam tbqh
  • filler
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #17025 on: March 15, 2013, 06:08:29 AM »
It's just like everything else, the effect his movies have have diminishing returns.

It's fun and unique the first time, the second time, but at some point you had enough.

If every show was like Twin Peaks, X-Files or the Wire I would grow tired of the tropes too.

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #17026 on: March 15, 2013, 09:36:43 AM »
Burton didn't direct Nightmare Before Christmas. He directed Corpse Bride. Tells you all you need to know.

And the guy who directed Nightmare Before Christmas also directed Coraline and James and the Giant Peach.
dog

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #17027 on: March 15, 2013, 10:05:20 AM »
Burton didn't direct Nightmare Before Christmas. He directed Corpse Bride. Tells you all you need to know.

And the guy who directed Nightmare Before Christmas also directed Coraline and James and the Giant Peach.

Both of which were better than Corpse Bride. :bow2
©@©™

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #17028 on: March 15, 2013, 04:50:11 PM »
Burton didn't direct Nightmare Before Christmas. He directed Corpse Bride. Tells you all you need to know.

And the guy who directed Nightmare Before Christmas also directed Coraline and James and the Giant Peach.

Which were also great films
010

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #17029 on: March 15, 2013, 04:53:06 PM »
James and the Giant Peach got put on Netflix streaming recently and I still haven't [re]watched it yet, makes me feel like an awful person who deserves nothing but derision and scorn. So, maybe I'll start watching it tonight.
dog

ManaByte

  • I must hurry back to my comic book store, where I dispense the insults rather than absorb them.
  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #17030 on: March 15, 2013, 08:30:24 PM »

Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines: Aside from the T-X inexplicably being able to create remote control functionality in police cars and fire engines, I liked this movie quite a bit. It is at least true to The Terminator and T2, unlike Terminator 4, which was just utter crap.  I liked Nick Stahl in Carnivâle, but he appears to be playing more or less the same character here. Claire Danes does alright, and I've always thought Arnie is at his best when playing an emotionless machine with a faulty speech processor. Fantastic ending to the film. For me, I should probably consider it the end of the series.

Even Cameron ended up liking T3 and basically said that if he were to have done a third one that's pretty much how the story would've went.

I don't think he ever commented on T4. I have it in the Best Buy exclusive Anthology set and never watched the R-rated cut. I think all they added to that were some tits.
CBG

ManaByte

  • I must hurry back to my comic book store, where I dispense the insults rather than absorb them.
  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #17031 on: March 16, 2013, 05:28:49 PM »
Saw Jurassic Park 3D on IMAX 3D. Conversion is much better than the one done on Star Wars or Titanic.
CBG

Eric P

  • I DESERVE the gold. I will GET the gold!
  • Icon
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #17032 on: March 17, 2013, 06:45:52 AM »
back in my day we did our own 3d conversion by dropping acid before watching it.

highly entertaining except for one friend who literally hid behind a seat whenever the raptors showed up
Tonya

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #17033 on: March 18, 2013, 07:27:08 PM »
 :lol

I watched a weird movie called 12:01 last night. It was supposedly a comedy in the vein of Groundhog Day, but there were zero laughs. Jonathan Silverman,  Jeremy Piven, Martin Landau, and Helen Slater starred. I am reminded that Helen Slater cannot act at all.

Turned it off and went back to Curb Your Enthusiasm.

BobFromPikeCreek

  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #17034 on: March 19, 2013, 06:09:22 PM »
:lol :lol Thank you! Been trying to remember the name of that movie for ages. It's awful.
zzzzz

Junpei the Tracer!

  • I started with Nightbright and ended with Comics
  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #17035 on: March 19, 2013, 06:42:54 PM »
I really enjoyed Stoker. Very well shot, some of the scenes had the camera rotating around the characters, I love shit like that. Felt some parts were kinda slow though.
Boo

HyperZoneWasAwesome

  • HastilyChosenUsername
  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #17036 on: March 20, 2013, 03:17:22 AM »
can't wait to see Stoker, I loves me some Chan Wook Park.

rewatched The Master last night, still my favorite movie of 2012, in a walk, but it loses some impact not seeing it in a theater.  Still dang great though.

Cerveza mas fina

  • I don't care for Islam tbqh
  • filler
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #17037 on: March 20, 2013, 04:11:53 AM »
Ruby Sparks

6.5/10, charming but lacks substance.

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: The new and improved "Movies you've seen recently" thread
« Reply #17038 on: March 20, 2013, 05:13:00 AM »
:lol :lol Thank you! Been trying to remember the name of that movie for ages. It's awful.

Happy to hear my pain, lost time, and single incidence of Amazon's "You might also like" Feature being wrong as fuck-all has lent you some relief!
 :lol

ManaByte

  • I must hurry back to my comic book store, where I dispense the insults rather than absorb them.
  • Senior Member
Re: The Movie News Topic
« Reply #17039 on: March 20, 2013, 10:14:31 AM »
CBG