wow what a shithold of a thread
i still welcome you conservativs among our fold
in any case, i despise unflinching conservatives such as yoruself just as i despies unflinching liberals.
i learned through life that i don't really have the patience for people who put ideology over this complex, gritty thing called 'reality'
- it's so amusing to see conservatives are comparing Cuban/NK-style Stalinist socialism with European/Canadian notions of welfare democracy, or socialist democracy. Does it make sense if I compare your RonPaulian libertarian right wing paradise with Nazi Germany?
- conservatives proudly and smugly boast against the evils of too much presence of the government. Yet they quickly deny or - more often, do not mention at all the evils of too much control from the private corporation...whose influence can be just as good or bad as government. Government answers to the people. I will repeat this:
Pros:
Government elected by the people and governed by agreed-upon rules - Constitution, laws, etc - exists by the people, for the people.
Similarly, private entities compete to bring the best fruits of competition, and results in wonderful, groundbreaking advances in many many industries, for the benefit of society in general.
Yet, as with reality, as with life, there are the dark sides, when it is taken too far:
- Government in excess can take you to China, or places where Govt has too much power. To the detriment of society.
- Private entities can also have too much power, to the detriment of society. In the US, see the health care, or teh broadband 'progress' [lol] to name just a few, to see this in effect.
There's a saying: A libertarian is the political opposite of the communist, and just as braindead.
Lemme ask you this: what do a libetarian, and a communist, and fundamentalist Christian, fundamentalist atheist, a racist, a sexist, a hardcore modernist, or a pure traditionalist have in common?
Answer: they put ideology over reality. When things don't pan out as they first predicted, they blame what's happening around them to avoid compromising their little walled garden of simple rules, unbreakable concepts, and clean theories.
Now, there's a ton of liberals at GAF, and at Evilbore, and I don't agree with alot of what they may say. This is why I am at heart, a moderate. I believe in the greatness of capitalism, yet greed - the engine of capitalism - sometimes involves in breaking the rules to the significant detriment of others, and sometimes collective means - what you call socialism - is necessary.
And as a parting note: it's so nice you use convenient labels like 'socialism.' And i agree - it is arguably socialist elements in things like UHC. So how about I return the favor and label your conservative lbieratarian principles as 'social darwinism?' I'm sure it's only fair, no?