Author Topic: THE JPEG FORMAT EATS SHIT OUT OF A SEA OF 55-GALLON DRUMS OF SHIT  (Read 759 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

T234

  • Canadian Legal Expert and Hillballer
  • Senior Member
Whoa. The difference is DRAMATIC.




VS


UK

WrikaWrek

  • Let your soul glow
  • Senior Member
Re: THE JPEG FORMAT EATS SHIT OUT OF A SEA OF 55-GALLON DRUMS OF SHIT
« Reply #1 on: November 24, 2008, 12:45:13 PM »

Don Flamenco

  • FootDiFootDiFootDive
  • Senior Member
Re: THE JPEG FORMAT EATS SHIT OUT OF A SEA OF 55-GALLON DRUMS OF SHIT
« Reply #2 on: November 24, 2008, 12:49:33 PM »
those are the same pic  ???

T234

  • Canadian Legal Expert and Hillballer
  • Senior Member
UK

T234

  • Canadian Legal Expert and Hillballer
  • Senior Member
Re: THE JPEG FORMAT EATS SHIT OUT OF A SEA OF 55-GALLON DRUMS OF SHIT
« Reply #4 on: November 24, 2008, 12:54:15 PM »
those are the same pic  ???
No way man, check file sizes and colors.
UK

MyNameIsMethodis

  • QUIT
  • Ebola Carrier
Re: THE JPEG FORMAT EATS SHIT OUT OF A SEA OF 55-GALLON DRUMS OF SHIT
« Reply #5 on: November 24, 2008, 12:54:31 PM »
The colors are more defined on the PNG.
USA

WrikaWrek

  • Let your soul glow
  • Senior Member
Re: THE JPEG FORMAT EATS SHIT OUT OF A SEA OF 55-GALLON DRUMS OF SHIT
« Reply #6 on: November 24, 2008, 12:58:46 PM »

OOOOOOOOOOHHHHH


I get it. It's not about the resources the PC is using, it's about the colors of the image. Goddamn man. Yeah, the lower one seems more vibrant.

T234

  • Canadian Legal Expert and Hillballer
  • Senior Member
Re: THE JPEG FORMAT EATS SHIT OUT OF A SEA OF 55-GALLON DRUMS OF SHIT
« Reply #7 on: November 24, 2008, 01:04:16 PM »
Somehow the PNG got bigger (file size) when it was uploaded to photobucket. On my machine it's at 1280x1024 and 60Kb, the JPG is 1280x1024 and 300Kb  :lol
UK

Don Flamenco

  • FootDiFootDiFootDive
  • Senior Member
Re: THE JPEG FORMAT EATS SHIT OUT OF A SEA OF 55-GALLON DRUMS OF SHIT
« Reply #8 on: November 24, 2008, 01:04:23 PM »
this is the most difficult format comparison thread I've ever read. it's like a riddle wrapped in an enigma wrapped in ass and titties

WrikaWrek

  • Let your soul glow
  • Senior Member
Re: THE JPEG FORMAT EATS SHIT OUT OF A SEA OF 55-GALLON DRUMS OF SHIT
« Reply #9 on: November 24, 2008, 01:11:05 PM »
The PNG file is 250kb, the JPEg file is 100kbs......

T234

  • Canadian Legal Expert and Hillballer
  • Senior Member
Re: THE JPEG FORMAT EATS SHIT OUT OF A SEA OF 55-GALLON DRUMS OF SHIT
« Reply #10 on: November 24, 2008, 01:31:19 PM »
Quote
A Excel Spreadsheet Made For The Purpose of Trolling a Goddamned Structured Binary Format On a Forum On The Internet SAVE ME PROLE

Formats   Local     Photobucket
PNG        59.8Kb   250.97Kb
JPG         296Kb   101.25Kb


NOTE: The pictures on my local machine are 1280x1024, whereas the ones on Photobucket were resized to 800x640                            
ALSO NOTE: Photobucket's resizing process eats shit.


UK

Fragamemnon

  • Excel 2008 GOTY
  • Icon
Re: THE JPEG FORMAT EATS SHIT OUT OF A SEA OF 55-GALLON DRUMS OF SHIT
« Reply #11 on: November 24, 2008, 01:37:43 PM »
rehost or just close the thread with a "photofuckit" post.
hex

T234

  • Canadian Legal Expert and Hillballer
  • Senior Member
Re: THE JPEG FORMAT EATS SHIT OUT OF A SEA OF 55-GALLON DRUMS OF SHIT
« Reply #12 on: November 24, 2008, 01:42:12 PM »


UK

Crushed

  • i am terrified by skellybones
  • Senior Member
Re: THE JPEG FORMAT EATS SHIT OUT OF A SEA OF 55-GALLON DRUMS OF SHIT
« Reply #13 on: November 24, 2008, 02:19:58 PM »
PNG has always been awesome.

:bow PNG :bow2
wtc

drew

  • sy
  • Senior Member
Re: THE JPEG FORMAT EATS SHIT OUT OF A SEA OF 55-GALLON DRUMS OF SHIT
« Reply #14 on: November 24, 2008, 02:58:01 PM »
 :spin