Do you have stats on how many deaths there have been when bank robberies have been attempted to be stopped? In this case, there wasn't any.
Since we don't often here these kinds of news stories, it's safe to assume the vast majority of bank tellers don't try to prevent the robberies.
So it stands to reason bank robbers usually don't shoot anyone, regardless of what happens.
But I thought bank robbers were crazy?
But I thought that conflict means innocent people die? Actually looking at the stats, there's a telling stat.
10 of the 13 deaths were bank robbers. So in other words, when they were challenged by someone, almost all the time they were the ones who got owned. Even if it was the authorities. (edit: I see that a police officer died too .. I guess he shouldn't have attempted to try to stop a bank robbery either, and just let him get away with it.)
Find me the stats where people have been killed because of a teller trying to stop a robbery, versus a teller apprehending a robber. I simply don't believe someone dies because someone steps up and tries to stop them like you make it sound. And that is all, I've wasted enough time on this worthless argument.