Author Topic: David Bowie > The Beatles.  (Read 5642 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Diunx

  • Humble motherfucker with a big-ass dick
  • Senior Member
David Bowie > The Beatles.
« on: February 15, 2010, 11:45:24 PM »
Why is this so fucking hard for people to understand  ???
Drunk

Eric P

  • I DESERVE the gold. I will GET the gold!
  • Icon
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #1 on: February 15, 2010, 11:46:01 PM »
i will probably lose cred in the eyes of some people, but i don't really like bowie's music

Tonya

Robo

  • Senior Member
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #2 on: February 15, 2010, 11:47:51 PM »
de-icon eric p
obo

Robo

  • Senior Member
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #3 on: February 15, 2010, 11:50:35 PM »
[youtube=560,345]rIzE3j84kKU[/youtube]

 :bow

spoiler (click to show/hide)
:bow  brel  :bow2
[close]
obo

tehjaybo

  • Kentucky-Bore's Last Hope
  • Senior Member
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #4 on: February 15, 2010, 11:53:44 PM »
I've never liked David Bowie.

:bow The Beatles :bow2
HURR

Himu

  • Senior Member
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #5 on: February 15, 2010, 11:54:57 PM »
[youtube=560,345]iZTkqNiVfTc[/youtube]
IYKYK

Eric P

  • I DESERVE the gold. I will GET the gold!
  • Icon
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #6 on: February 16, 2010, 12:00:11 AM »
boooooooooring
Tonya

Eric P

  • I DESERVE the gold. I will GET the gold!
  • Icon
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #7 on: February 16, 2010, 12:02:08 AM »
i like that one song that was used to sell swatch pager watches

Tonya

Diunx

  • Humble motherfucker with a big-ass dick
  • Senior Member
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #8 on: February 16, 2010, 12:11:42 AM »
[youtube=560,345][/youtube]

:bow
Drunk

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #9 on: February 16, 2010, 12:13:07 AM »
Greatest Collaboration in Music History:

[youtube=560,345]xtrEN-YKLBM[/youtube]

Also awesome:

[youtube=560,345]YWX_MFNOL_Y[/youtube]
dog

Howard Alan Treesong

  • キング・メタル・ドラゴン
  • Icon
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #10 on: February 16, 2010, 12:16:11 AM »
Bowie is my single favorite artist, with the possible exception of the Talking Heads. You are dead to me, Eric P! ...okay, you're alive again.

But thanks for the opportunity to repost this song:

[youtube=560,345][/youtube]
乱学者

Stoney Mason

  • So Long and thanks for all the fish
  • Senior Member
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #11 on: February 16, 2010, 12:17:31 AM »
[youtube=560,345][/youtube]

cool breeze

  • Senior Member
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #12 on: February 16, 2010, 12:20:58 AM »
Greatest Collaboration in Music History:

[youtube=560,345]xtrEN-YKLBM[/youtube]

Indeed!

Queen is the best.  Queen + Bowie is spectacular.

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #13 on: February 16, 2010, 12:25:24 AM »
[youtube=560,345][/youtube]

David Bowie is so awesome. :rofl
dog

Diunx

  • Humble motherfucker with a big-ass dick
  • Senior Member
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #14 on: February 16, 2010, 12:30:17 AM »
[youtube=560,345][/youtube]

I love that scene :rofl
Drunk

Human Snorenado

  • Stay out of Malibu, Lebowski
  • Icon
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #15 on: February 16, 2010, 12:33:05 AM »
Little fat man who sold his soul... little fat man...
yar

BlueTsunami

  • The Muffin Man
  • Senior Member
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #16 on: February 16, 2010, 12:43:11 AM »
The use of Cat People in Inglorious Basterds was so good. So good.
:9

Raban

  • Senior Member
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #17 on: February 16, 2010, 12:48:40 AM »
While we're at it...
The Beach Boys > The Beatles

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #18 on: February 16, 2010, 12:53:49 AM »
Little fat man who sold his soul... little fat man...

The clown that no one laughs at...they all just wish he'd die...

:rofl
dog

Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #19 on: February 16, 2010, 01:11:03 AM »
Shit. If this thread can't bring Malek back, nothing can!
野球

Diunx

  • Humble motherfucker with a big-ass dick
  • Senior Member
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #20 on: February 16, 2010, 01:11:59 AM »
Malek's gone?
Drunk

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #21 on: February 16, 2010, 01:14:59 AM »
Low is one of the most boring, overrated albums I've heard. I just hate synthesizers man
010

BlueTsunami

  • The Muffin Man
  • Senior Member
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #22 on: February 16, 2010, 01:31:17 AM »
:9

Human Snorenado

  • Stay out of Malibu, Lebowski
  • Icon
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #23 on: February 16, 2010, 01:35:58 AM »
Low is one of the most boring, overrated albums I've heard. I just hate synthesizers man

This is not the "Cher had some hits" thread.  This is a thread for people of musical taste to enjoy David Bowie's superiority to anything you've ever illegally downloaded or listened to.  Get out.
yar

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #24 on: February 16, 2010, 01:43:01 AM »
[youtube=560,345]TOSZwEwl_1Q[/youtube]
>>>Low

Seriously, I illegally downloaded it to see why Pitchfork held it in such high regard. I really like  Hunky Dory, Ziggy Stardust, and Alladin Sane. But Low is just...eh. The instrumental tracks are boring, and overall it's just forgettable. I'll give it another try but eh, it didn't impress me. From what I've read it was a rather innovative and influential record at the time.
010

BobbyRobby

  • yachtsman
  • Member
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #25 on: February 16, 2010, 01:46:16 AM »
i love late 60s-70s Bowie, not more than the Beatles though

Stoney Mason

  • So Long and thanks for all the fish
  • Senior Member
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #26 on: February 16, 2010, 01:52:59 AM »
I was a rather late in life convert to Bowie but yes he is brilliant and his late 60's through the 70's work is some of the best music ever created.

It's a personal taste thing but I would rather listen to Bowie over the Beatles any day of the week which is not to say the Beatles weren't great themselves.

Howard Alan Treesong

  • キング・メタル・ドラゴン
  • Icon
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #27 on: February 16, 2010, 02:07:36 AM »
乱学者

OptimoPeach

  • Senior Member
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #28 on: February 16, 2010, 05:13:22 AM »
edit: woops
« Last Edit: February 16, 2010, 05:16:56 AM by OptimoPeach »
hi5

pilonv1

  • I love you just the way I am
  • Senior Member
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #29 on: February 16, 2010, 07:45:42 AM »
I've never liked David Bowie.

:bow The Beatles :bow2
itm

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #30 on: February 16, 2010, 09:29:14 AM »
There are tons of artists better than the Beatles. 

I'm going to go ahead and say how I really feel...

The Beatles are mediocre... at best.  Woo.  Got that off my chest.  I understand why they were important and some of their songs are great.  But listening to their music is like playing battleship and trying to get that last little ship that takes up one square.  Near fucking impossible to find something listenable out of so many songs.

BobFromPikeCreek

  • Senior Member
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #31 on: February 16, 2010, 09:41:01 AM »
Seriously, I illegally downloaded it to see why Pitchfork held it in such high regard. I really like  Hunky Dory, Ziggy Stardust, and Alladin Sane. But Low is just...eh. The instrumental tracks are boring, and overall it's just forgettable. I'll give it another try but eh, it didn't impress me. From what I've read it was a rather innovative and influential record at the time.

Listen to Station to Station or Lodger first. They're both more accessible, but will make you more comfortable with the style of the other two Berlin Trilogy albums.
zzzzz

Robo

  • Senior Member
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #32 on: February 16, 2010, 10:28:02 AM »
Scary Monsters would probably work too.
obo

Dickie Dee

  • It's not the band I hate, it's their fans.
  • Senior Member
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #33 on: February 16, 2010, 10:29:43 AM »
The Beatles > *

the truth hurts  :'(
___

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #34 on: February 16, 2010, 10:45:18 AM »
The Beatles > *

the truth hurts  :'(
Is that star supposed to be a little butthole?  because then i'd say they're about even.

Dickie Dee

  • It's not the band I hate, it's their fans.
  • Senior Member
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #35 on: February 16, 2010, 10:48:56 AM »
that's the highest praise EB is capable of
___

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #36 on: February 16, 2010, 10:53:43 AM »
:o  You got me there ;)

Tauntaun

  • I'm cute, you should be too.
  • Senior Member
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #37 on: February 16, 2010, 11:38:09 AM »
Nirvana > Bowie

[youtube=560,345]fregObNcHC8[/youtube]
:)

M3wThr33

  • Member
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #38 on: February 16, 2010, 12:34:44 PM »
Good music, but holy fuck Novoselic and Grohl were ugly fuckers back then.

BobFromPikeCreek

  • Senior Member
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #39 on: February 16, 2010, 12:43:59 PM »
The Nirvana version of that song is definitely better than Bowie's studio version, but I think my favourite performance of it is from when Bowie was on SNL with Klaus Nomi singing backup.
zzzzz

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #40 on: February 16, 2010, 04:30:46 PM »
I want in on some Nirvana hate. 

CajoleJuice

  • kill me
  • Icon
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #41 on: February 16, 2010, 04:31:06 PM »
As much as I love Nirvana, they are pretty fucking overrated. They're not even the best grunge band, Pearl Jam are better. So are Alice In Chains.

Soundgarden > all of them
AMC

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #42 on: February 16, 2010, 04:31:31 PM »
Boobies > all of them

TEEEPO

  • hi, i suck
  • Senior Member
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #43 on: February 16, 2010, 04:32:26 PM »
i'd like to just mention that in utero is one of the greatest records of all time.

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #44 on: February 16, 2010, 04:32:43 PM »
Pearl Jam has one good album, gtfo

Soundgarden>Nirvana>AiC>*

010

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #45 on: February 16, 2010, 04:46:49 PM »
010

Eric P

  • I DESERVE the gold. I will GET the gold!
  • Icon
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #46 on: February 16, 2010, 04:48:22 PM »
Pearl Jam has one good album, gtfo

Soundgarden>Nirvana>AiC>*



mudhoney and the melvins uber alles you mtv milkfed reprobates
Tonya

Robo

  • Senior Member
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #47 on: February 16, 2010, 04:49:38 PM »
If The Pixies qualify, there isn't any room for further discussion.
obo

Diunx

  • Humble motherfucker with a big-ass dick
  • Senior Member
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #48 on: February 16, 2010, 04:51:40 PM »
The shit I just took >>>>>> Pearl Jam.
Drunk

Eric P

  • I DESERVE the gold. I will GET the gold!
  • Icon
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #49 on: February 16, 2010, 04:51:48 PM »
the pixies do not otherwise the stooges, late black flag and government issue would qualify and then it's all over for the pixies
Tonya

Raban

  • Senior Member
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #50 on: February 16, 2010, 04:53:28 PM »
I classify Nirvana in the same place I put the Beatles. They are remembered more for what they started than what they actually did.

Nirvana isn't crap, but everything that came after in its wake was much better.

Same with the Beatles.

Robo

  • Senior Member
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #51 on: February 16, 2010, 04:54:15 PM »
the pixies do not otherwise the stooges, late black flag and government issue would qualify and then it's all over for the pixies

FINE
obo

OptimoPeach

  • Senior Member
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #52 on: February 16, 2010, 04:56:01 PM »
Pearl Jam has one good album, gtfo

Soundgarden>Nirvana>AiC>*


You seem to have confused your greater than and less than symbols
hi5

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #53 on: February 16, 2010, 04:57:34 PM »
List of ">" bands for the last 45 years...

Tool/A Perfect Circle = Matchbox 20 > *

CajoleJuice

  • kill me
  • Icon
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #54 on: February 16, 2010, 04:59:00 PM »
Drinky agrees.
AMC

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #55 on: February 16, 2010, 05:21:24 PM »
Pearl Jam has one good album, gtfo

Soundgarden>Nirvana>AiC>*



mudhoney and the melvins uber alles you mtv milkfed reprobates

who? :smug
010

Dickie Dee

  • It's not the band I hate, it's their fans.
  • Senior Member
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #56 on: February 16, 2010, 05:23:29 PM »
If it'll only be a wankfest trollpit of how great bands aren't that great (The Monkeys > The Beatles, huh yuk yuk) forget about it
___

Raban

  • Senior Member
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #57 on: February 16, 2010, 05:29:15 PM »
But the monkeys don't even play their instruments.

Anyway I'd love to discuss albums, songs, solos, riffs, bands and musicians with you guys. I don't have any other outlet anyway.

What? How? Everyone listens to music, how can you not talk about it with friends?

The Fake Shemp

  • Ebola Carrier
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #58 on: February 16, 2010, 05:29:57 PM »
Creativity is banned in Saudi Arabia. Ever see the film 1984? Imagine an entire country like that, but they wear turbans!
PSP

Mupepe

  • Icon
Re: David Bowie > The Beatles.
« Reply #59 on: February 16, 2010, 05:32:40 PM »
Thank you!  Come again!