All of those reviews have a line similar to "Let's get this straight: Mafia II isn't an open world game, nor is it intended to be." and then a bit later "There aren't many side activities, the open nature is wasted, it's 10 hours long, etc. etc." One of them even appears to be glad there isn't as much busywork as there is in games like Saint's Row and RDR, only to complain about the lack of side missions later in the review. So which is it? It seems like they all go in knowing (and telling the reader) that it wasn't meant to be an open world game, and then ended up reviewing it like it was. I don't trust a single review I read from Stoney's links.