Author Topic: Battlefield 3  (Read 56356 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

naff

  • someday you feed on a tree frog
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #120 on: June 18, 2011, 10:36:42 PM »
That looked pretty good for a PS3 version. It's interesting they chose to demo it on PS3, gotta remember that the triple can't use Direct3D or anything DX related so it must mean Dice is pretty confident on Frostbite 2's performance outside of Microsoft platforms.
◕‿◕

maxy

  • Sales Loser
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #121 on: June 19, 2011, 01:55:12 AM »
Angry LOLstation 3 fan
Quote
why cant Dice take more time learning the PS3 hardware, if you would, that gameplay would of looked 10 times better, example: KZ3/UN3!


DICE rendering architect
Quote
bullshit
cat

naff

  • someday you feed on a tree frog
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #122 on: June 19, 2011, 09:04:17 AM »
:lol
◕‿◕

BlueTsunami

  • The Muffin Man
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #123 on: June 19, 2011, 10:02:27 AM »
"Learn hardware". Dudes either trolling or that's a great way to spot a mouth breather with no experience with developing games.
:9

SantaC

  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #124 on: June 19, 2011, 10:59:10 AM »
BF3 is at dreamhack right now. No new info though.


Stoney Mason

  • So Long and thanks for all the fish
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #125 on: August 16, 2011, 11:26:53 AM »
[youtube=560,345][/youtube]

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #126 on: August 16, 2011, 11:35:17 AM »
Looks pretty wild.
dog

fistfulofmetal

  • RAPTOR
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #127 on: August 16, 2011, 12:26:56 PM »
omg

dat jet gameplay
nat

fistfulofmetal

  • RAPTOR
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #128 on: August 16, 2011, 12:57:56 PM »
THIS LOOKS AMAZING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
nat

Vizzys

  • green hair connoisseur
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #129 on: August 16, 2011, 01:23:04 PM »
萌え~

cool breeze

  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #130 on: August 16, 2011, 02:39:39 PM »
the jets look amazing.  it might just be the video, but they looked slightly slowed down from BF2. 

Stoney Mason

  • So Long and thanks for all the fish
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #131 on: August 16, 2011, 02:53:15 PM »
Regenerative health in tanks seems like an odd idea for this series. I can see certain instances where that could be really annoying. We'll see I guess.

Cerveza mas fina

  • I don't care for Islam tbqh
  • filler
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #132 on: August 16, 2011, 05:48:41 PM »
Regenerative health for tanks? I don't get it :(

cool breeze

  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #133 on: August 16, 2011, 10:26:52 PM »
I remembering reading a bit into it before.  It's not like infantry's regenerating health where you hide and it recovers in seconds.  It's supposed to be very slow and basically ineffective in action to keep the engineer relevant.

I think it's so you don't jump in a jeep and find it only has 5% health.  Because engineers have no real reason to repair random, unattended vehicles.

maxy

  • Sales Loser
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #134 on: September 04, 2011, 03:58:32 PM »


 :-X
cat

BlueTsunami

  • The Muffin Man
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #135 on: September 04, 2011, 04:19:19 PM »
I wonder how that's going to work? Install the game to the HDD?
:9

maxy

  • Sales Loser
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #136 on: September 04, 2011, 04:22:02 PM »
maybe

or sp and mp disc
cat

cool breeze

  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #137 on: September 04, 2011, 05:14:45 PM »
sp and mp dvds make the most sense.  a lot of pc games use a different executable for each component, like the Call of Duty games.  I know the 360 version lets you boot straight into multiplayer for Black Ops.  I'm guessing DVD 2 will be like that. 

archie4208

  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #138 on: September 05, 2011, 10:19:17 AM »
Xbox version is 2 discs.

SantaC

  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #139 on: September 05, 2011, 04:12:31 PM »
isnt RAGE using 3 discs?

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #140 on: September 06, 2011, 07:37:06 AM »
isnt RAGE using 3 discs?

RAGE is using only one disc, and only one big texture.

SantaC

  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #141 on: September 06, 2011, 03:31:21 PM »

naff

  • someday you feed on a tree frog
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #142 on: September 06, 2011, 04:48:08 PM »
If Tim Willits said three discs, two for SP one for MP that's better than some websites that say 22gb install then assuming 2 discs. 22gb for SP sounds likely.
◕‿◕

chronovore

  • relapsed dev
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #143 on: September 07, 2011, 04:54:05 AM »
Sorry, my post was intended as a joke.

CajoleJuice

  • kill me
  • Icon
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #144 on: September 09, 2011, 11:22:15 PM »
Jesus CHRIST this game looks incredible

[youtube=560,345][/youtube]
AMC

duckman2000

  • A lot of shit pisses me off
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #145 on: September 10, 2011, 02:59:07 AM »
I think I'm past "OMG look at dem graphics." With how SHIT the Bad Company 2 campaign was, it's hardly something to get excited about.

duckman2000

  • A lot of shit pisses me off
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #146 on: September 10, 2011, 03:22:16 AM »
Nobody plays BF games for the SP. Except maybe the ex-Haze players.

Yet that's a campaign trailer we just saw. Evolve, Borys.

CajoleJuice

  • kill me
  • Icon
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #147 on: September 10, 2011, 03:25:55 AM »
Yeah I still don't care about the campaign

just TEH GRAPHIX
AMC

maxy

  • Sales Loser
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #148 on: September 12, 2011, 06:41:33 AM »
Battlefield 3 360 pics
 :rofl






WTF is this  :lol...XBOX 1 pictures?

No wonder that they are hiding 360 version,it looks like shit
BF3turd
COD at 60 fps looks generation ahead of this

cat

naff

  • someday you feed on a tree frog
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #149 on: September 12, 2011, 07:41:49 AM »
Damn, under 7 weeks till launch and this is looking worse than BFBC2... Wtf

Even if I had a good rig I want 360 version to play with friends. Meh, I'll still love the game, even if I am in the console ghetto  :'(
« Last Edit: September 12, 2011, 07:44:10 AM by quietID »
◕‿◕

maxy

  • Sales Loser
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #150 on: September 12, 2011, 07:48:36 AM »
To be fair,this is some dev build.

But if you expect miracles,don't


Jet gameplay
[youtube=560,345]#![/youtube]

This is the first 360 gameplay footage and of course it's low rez and compressed like hell.

And that happens like one month before BF3 hits the shelves,EA marketing total fail.
« Last Edit: September 12, 2011, 07:58:28 AM by maxy »
cat

pilonv1

  • I love you just the way I am
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #151 on: September 12, 2011, 07:58:00 AM »
BF3 gonna get slaughtered on consoles by COD sadly. Probably will be $40 by Black Friday, if not sooner.
itm

maxy

  • Sales Loser
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #152 on: September 12, 2011, 08:25:16 AM »
Part 4


This shit is leaking like crazy,the good thing is that EA might be forced to release some proper 360 footage.
cat

Stoney Mason

  • So Long and thanks for all the fish
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #153 on: September 12, 2011, 08:28:28 AM »
lulz. That gaf thread is funny because the bf3 fanboys are spinning their asses off. That crew is very obnoxious on GAF.

For what its worth I personally don't really care about the graphics. I'm sure they will be decent enough when the game releases. The fact that its 30 fps on consoles bothers me more than any perceived graphical issues.

Also the game will sell well on consoles. BC 2 sold well on consoles. This will sell better than that. Because it won't reach MW 3 numbers doesn't mean it didn't sell well. Not to mention it will have a huge marketing budget. It already has had one in fact.

Great Rumbler

  • Dab on the sinners
  • Global Moderator
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #154 on: September 12, 2011, 09:17:01 AM »
dog

fistfulofmetal

  • RAPTOR
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #155 on: September 12, 2011, 10:19:30 AM »
playing battlefield on a console  ???
nat

archie4208

  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #156 on: September 12, 2011, 10:24:12 AM »
I wonder if the PC version on low looks better.  :teehee

CajoleJuice

  • kill me
  • Icon
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #157 on: September 12, 2011, 10:50:03 AM »
lulz. That gaf thread is funny because the bf3 fanboys are spinning their asses off. That crew is very obnoxious on GAF.

For what its worth I personally don't really care about the graphics. I'm sure they will be decent enough when the game releases. The fact that its 30 fps on consoles bothers me more than any perceived graphical issues.

Also the game will sell well on consoles. BC 2 sold well on consoles. This will sell better than that. Because it won't reach MW 3 numbers doesn't mean it didn't sell well. Not to mention it will have a huge marketing budget. It already has had one in fact.

24 player limit as opposed to 64 players should bother you more
AMC

CajoleJuice

  • kill me
  • Icon
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #158 on: September 12, 2011, 11:16:59 AM »
lulz. That gaf thread is funny because the bf3 fanboys are spinning their asses off. That crew is very obnoxious on GAF.

For what its worth I personally don't really care about the graphics. I'm sure they will be decent enough when the game releases. The fact that its 30 fps on consoles bothers me more than any perceived graphical issues.

Also the game will sell well on consoles. BC 2 sold well on consoles. This will sell better than that. Because it won't reach MW 3 numbers doesn't mean it didn't sell well. Not to mention it will have a huge marketing budget. It already has had one in fact.

24 player limit as opposed to 64 players should bother you more

I'd rather play 24-players and have $1000 left in my pocket, thanks.

what happened to you, borys
AMC

Stoney Mason

  • So Long and thanks for all the fish
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #159 on: September 12, 2011, 12:10:16 PM »
lulz. That gaf thread is funny because the bf3 fanboys are spinning their asses off. That crew is very obnoxious on GAF.

For what its worth I personally don't really care about the graphics. I'm sure they will be decent enough when the game releases. The fact that its 30 fps on consoles bothers me more than any perceived graphical issues.

Also the game will sell well on consoles. BC 2 sold well on consoles. This will sell better than that. Because it won't reach MW 3 numbers doesn't mean it didn't sell well. Not to mention it will have a huge marketing budget. It already has had one in fact.

24 player limit as opposed to 64 players should bother you more

I would prefer they bumped it up to 32 like Homefront but honestly I'm not one of those dudes who jizz at 64 player battlefield. All those players just tend to make the game a chaotic mess imo. Same reason why I don't like the over-stuffed player counts in the PC versions of the COD games.

Phoenix Dark

  • I got no game it's just some bitches understand my story
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #160 on: September 12, 2011, 12:39:03 PM »
Why would anyone willing buy a console BF over PC BF? Makes no sense. 24 players v 64 players, come on son
010

Stoney Mason

  • So Long and thanks for all the fish
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #161 on: September 12, 2011, 12:59:39 PM »
Why would anyone willing buy a console BF over PC BF? Makes no sense. 24 players v 64 players, come on son

1. I'm not a graphics guy
2. High player count is meaningless to me. See MAG.
3. I've got a core set of people I already play shooters with on my friends list.

duckman2000

  • A lot of shit pisses me off
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #162 on: September 12, 2011, 02:40:57 PM »
lulz. That gaf thread is funny because the bf3 fanboys are spinning their asses off. That crew is very obnoxious on GAF.

For what its worth I personally don't really care about the graphics. I'm sure they will be decent enough when the game releases. The fact that its 30 fps on consoles bothers me more than any perceived graphical issues.

Also the game will sell well on consoles. BC 2 sold well on consoles. This will sell better than that. Because it won't reach MW 3 numbers doesn't mean it didn't sell well. Not to mention it will have a huge marketing budget. It already has had one in fact.

24 player limit as opposed to 64 players should bother you more

I would prefer they bumped it up to 32 like Homefront but honestly I'm not one of those dudes who jizz at 64 player battlefield. All those players just tend to make the game a chaotic mess imo. Same reason why I don't like the over-stuffed player counts in the PC versions of the COD games.

That's all dependent on the crowd and the map layout, though. I feel less crowded on a full Warhawk map than I do on a typical COD map with a fraction of the player count. Either way I prefer having the option, as opposed to being locked into some lower number. But to each their own.

maxy

  • Sales Loser
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #163 on: September 13, 2011, 12:00:00 PM »
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2011-09-13-ea-explains-bf3-xbox-360-disc-split#justposted

Quote
Eurogamer has discovered what is on each of the two Xbox 360 Battlefield 3 DVD discs.

"Battlefield 3 for Xbox 360 ships on two discs with endless hours of spectacular high-definition gameplay," EA told us this afternoon.

"Disc one features the stunning multiplayer, co-op levels and HD installation content.

"Disc two features the superb single-player campaign."

From the comments

Quote
Just quizzed EA on the "HD installation" comment, thinking they might have meant "HDD installation".
But they didn't. It's definitely "HD installation content", as in "hi-definition".

Could be high def cutscenes or hi def something

« Last Edit: September 13, 2011, 01:25:51 PM by maxy »
cat

maxy

  • Sales Loser
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #164 on: September 17, 2011, 01:34:57 AM »
First 360 footage

[youtube=560,345][/youtube]

flashy
cat

SantaC

  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #165 on: September 17, 2011, 05:44:23 PM »
never trust leaked footage

fistfulofmetal

  • RAPTOR
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #166 on: September 20, 2011, 09:28:37 AM »
Beta is Setp 29th to Oct 10th. Rush mode. Map is Metro

so basically same as alpha

so basically i'm not mad about not getting in early.
nat

SantaC

  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #167 on: September 21, 2011, 10:25:36 AM »
Beta is Setp 29th to Oct 10th. Rush mode. Map is Metro

so basically same as alpha

so basically i'm not mad about not getting in early.

beta is 27th for those who bought moh le

fistfulofmetal

  • RAPTOR
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #168 on: September 21, 2011, 12:26:47 PM »
also origin pre-orders
nat

SantaC

  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #169 on: September 21, 2011, 01:35:55 PM »
also origin pre-orders

can you still preorder and get it early?

fistfulofmetal

  • RAPTOR
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #170 on: September 21, 2011, 02:11:32 PM »
yes
nat

fistfulofmetal

  • RAPTOR
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #171 on: September 22, 2011, 05:40:25 AM »
you can now check if your system is going to run the game using http://www.systemrequirementslab.com/cyri/



16 gigs of ram :smug
nat

maxy

  • Sales Loser
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #172 on: September 22, 2011, 09:47:02 AM »
Those gigabytes won't help you with this


http://blog.eu.playstation.com/2011/09/22/battlefield-3-beta-dates-and-ps3-dlc-exclusivity-2/
Quote
You’ll be happy to know that, starting with our first expansion pack Battlefield 3: Back to Karkand (released later this year), all full-blown upcoming expansion packs for the game will appear one week early exclusively on PlayStation

mastertards  :'(
xtards  :'(


stards  :lol  :smug
cat

Cerveza mas fina

  • I don't care for Islam tbqh
  • filler
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #173 on: September 22, 2011, 01:30:20 PM »
Why does it look so shit on threesixy? Gears 3 looks great.

cool breeze

  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #174 on: September 22, 2011, 06:21:54 PM »
BF2 didn't really have single player; same for 1942, Vietnam and 2142.  I remember the single player modes were just bot matches.

BF2 Modern Combat on the PS2/Xbox/360 was the first Battlefield game to have something resembling a single player game.  It was still a bot match, but you were some magical battlefield ghost who could inhabit any friendly soldier.  So if you were a ground unit and saw a helicopter, you could transplant your consciousness into that helicopter pilot instantly.  Bad Company 1 had an actual campaign, but the maps were still fairly open and Battlefield-ish.  Bad Company 2 was Call of Duty.  Battlefield 3 is Call of Duty. 

SantaC

  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #175 on: September 22, 2011, 08:02:24 PM »
Why does it look so shit on threesixy? Gears 3 looks great.

lol did you see the official 360 trailer? blows away gears easily.

Frostbite 2.0 > UE3

Quote
I honestly didn't know that BF2 had a SP until this game was talked about

uh BF2 did not have a SP.

SantaC

  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #176 on: September 25, 2011, 06:15:50 PM »
so is anyone here going to play the beta?

Stoney Mason

  • So Long and thanks for all the fish
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #177 on: September 25, 2011, 06:26:37 PM »
After the early access stuff, is it open to everyone or only preorders?

fistfulofmetal

  • RAPTOR
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #178 on: September 25, 2011, 06:31:24 PM »
After the early access stuff, is it open to everyone or only preorders?

it's a full open beta.
nat

Stoney Mason

  • So Long and thanks for all the fish
  • Senior Member
Re: Battlefield 3
« Reply #179 on: September 25, 2011, 06:32:53 PM »
Then yeah I'll definitely play it next week on 360 although I'm going to be out of town for a few days next week.