Author Topic: star trek  (Read 149824 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

D3RANG3D

  • The Bore's Like Botô
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3300 on: May 23, 2020, 01:04:08 PM »
Nah it just needs people to have some standards with the media they consume.  :P

CatsCatsCats

  • 🤷‍♀️
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3301 on: May 23, 2020, 01:05:49 PM »
I swear to watch Picard today and add Star Trek content within the week

bork

  • おっぱいは命、尻は故郷
  • Global Moderator
Re: star trek
« Reply #3302 on: May 23, 2020, 01:09:42 PM »
I swear to watch Picard today and add Star Trek content within the week
:bolo
ど助平

Tasty

  • 🌺 Neo Flower Child 🌸
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3303 on: May 23, 2020, 01:13:11 PM »
I think a new thread with the following rules would be fine:

- No RLM discussion (can be touched on, but I'm fine with RLM videos being in the RLM thread, clearly it's become a distraction no matter how you feel about them)
- No personal attacks or saying shit like "You're an idiot if you like X"

For the latter, it's less about censorship of free speech and more that everyone has trotted that line out at least four different times in support of their "argument" except it doesn't support any argument and I'm sick of reading it.

I think this board could support a healthy Star Trek discussion and it wouldn't take much, just people not acting like fucking howler monkeys flinging shit at each other basically.

Cindi was on the right track with her separate thread. If it was allowed to stay separate and was retitled instead of merged, this mess would have been avoided.
🕊

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3304 on: May 23, 2020, 01:13:22 PM »
Rebooting the thread won't help bork, the words may disappear but these feels will stay. I don't have an answer either, for me personally I just disengage when I can tell shit's about to get hairy, I had a lovely arguement with Stoney the other day and I felt it ended okay, kinda bums me out to see how mad/sad everyone is tbh :fbm

bork

  • おっぱいは命、尻は故郷
  • Global Moderator
Re: star trek
« Reply #3305 on: May 23, 2020, 01:15:31 PM »
Rebooting the thread won't help bork, the words may disappear but these feels will stay. I don't have an answer either, for me personally I just disengage when I can tell shit's about to get hairy, I had a lovely arguement with Stoney the other day and I felt it ended okay, kinda bums me out to see how mad/sad everyone is tbh :fbm

The answer is "talk about Star Trek and debating is OK, but stop shitting on each other for having differing opinions."  Be like the federation and do it diplomatically or whatever.  Sorry, I don't know enough about Trek for this.
ど助平

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3306 on: May 23, 2020, 01:19:04 PM »
Rebooting the thread won't help bork, the words may disappear but these feels will stay. I don't have an answer either, for me personally I just disengage when I can tell shit's about to get hairy, I had a lovely arguement with Stoney the other day and I felt it ended okay, kinda bums me out to see how mad/sad everyone is tbh :fbm

The answer is "talk about Star Trek and debating is OK, but stop shitting on each other for having differing opinions."  Be like the federation and do it diplomatically or whatever.  Sorry, I don't know enough about Trek for this.
Federation diplomacy requires compliance, Ferengi diplomacy only needs the will to make profit  :quark

Cindi Mayweather

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3307 on: May 23, 2020, 01:22:03 PM »
I think a new thread with the following rules would be fine:

- No RLM discussion (can be touched on, but I'm fine with RLM videos being in the RLM thread, clearly it's become a distraction no matter how you feel about them)
- No personal attacks or saying shit like "You're an idiot if you like X"

For the latter, it's less about censorship of free speech and more that everyone has trotted that line out at least four different times in support of their "argument" except it doesn't support any argument and I'm sick of reading it.

I think this board could support a healthy Star Trek discussion and it wouldn't take much, just people not acting like fucking howler monkeys flinging shit at each other basically.

Cindi was on the right track with her separate thread. If it was allowed to stay separate and was retitled instead of merged, this mess would have been avoided.

I'm not allowed to have a separate thread because constant modding.

Can't have it both ways. We have people completely at odds with each other so I make a new Star Trek thread. It gets posts. Mod moves those goddamn posts and FORCES us to interact, when we all know we are volatile. THANKS MODS.
weed

Tasty

  • 🌺 Neo Flower Child 🌸
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3308 on: May 23, 2020, 01:24:02 PM »
I agree it was a poor decision. The thread should have been retitled.

Thread-based message boards allow people to avoid entering threads they don't want to participate in; being forced into a thread makes interacting with others inevitable and Super Ignore doesn't scale for everyone.
🕊

bork

  • おっぱいは命、尻は故郷
  • Global Moderator
Re: star trek
« Reply #3309 on: May 23, 2020, 01:25:15 PM »
I think a new thread with the following rules would be fine:

- No RLM discussion (can be touched on, but I'm fine with RLM videos being in the RLM thread, clearly it's become a distraction no matter how you feel about them)
- No personal attacks or saying shit like "You're an idiot if you like X"

For the latter, it's less about censorship of free speech and more that everyone has trotted that line out at least four different times in support of their "argument" except it doesn't support any argument and I'm sick of reading it.

I think this board could support a healthy Star Trek discussion and it wouldn't take much, just people not acting like fucking howler monkeys flinging shit at each other basically.

Cindi was on the right track with her separate thread. If it was allowed to stay separate and was retitled instead of merged, this mess would have been avoided.

I'm not allowed to have a separate thread because constant modding.

Can't have it both ways. We have people completely at odds with each other so I make a new Star Trek thread. It gets posts. Mod moves those goddamn posts and FORCES us to interact, when we all know we are volatile. THANKS MODS.

Sigh.

Nobody said you couldn't post in your other thread.  Your other thread is still there.  I thought the thread was bumped accidentally and merged the last couple of posts here.  We've already had this discussion.

I'm getting so tired of this fucking shit. 
ど助平

Cindi Mayweather

  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3310 on: May 23, 2020, 01:28:12 PM »
Also thanks bork for snitching on MMrasu. Now we know why mods are suddenly in this thread. It's because you're a PUSSY THAT REPORTS.
weed

Esch

  • Bob's Burghers
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3311 on: May 23, 2020, 01:30:40 PM »
reading through the last few pages is making me regret ever submitting post on this thread :dead

bork

  • おっぱいは命、尻は故郷
  • Global Moderator
Re: star trek
« Reply #3312 on: May 23, 2020, 01:30:51 PM »
Also thanks bork for snitching on MMrasu. Now we know why mods are suddenly in this thread. It's because you're a PUSSY THAT REPORTS.

He's not the only one who has reported posts here.  Also stop.  That goes for everybody- stop it with starting up more shit. 

All of you.  Move on or get a ban.  It has come to that now.  Over fucking STAR TREK.
ど助平

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3313 on: May 23, 2020, 01:32:35 PM »
You should just ignore all reports, stop moderating and only add emotes when you feel like it, make it someone else's problem  :asuka


I get along with you well bork, and I honestly think it's not worth your trouble, you catch a lot of shit on here for situations you're asked to get involved in via reports and I don't think it's right for you to carry this shit, our shit.

Tasty

  • 🌺 Neo Flower Child 🌸
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3314 on: May 23, 2020, 01:33:44 PM »
bork is not immune to taking shit too seriously either. :trumps
🕊

bork

  • おっぱいは命、尻は故郷
  • Global Moderator
Re: star trek
« Reply #3315 on: May 23, 2020, 01:34:07 PM »
Momo, please stop posting about this.  I'm just going to close this thread if it continues.
ど助平

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3316 on: May 23, 2020, 01:34:54 PM »
reading through the last few pages is making me regret ever submitting post on this thread :dead
I actually read the first few pages of this thread yesterday, thread was banging back then  :ryker

CatsCatsCats

  • 🤷‍♀️
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3317 on: May 23, 2020, 01:35:04 PM »
Iím sentencing all of the bire to attend a zoom meeting on nonviolent communication

Nintex

  • CORPO
  • Senior Member
Re: star trek
« Reply #3318 on: May 23, 2020, 01:36:30 PM »
Also thanks bork for snitching on MMrasu. Now we know why mods are suddenly in this thread. It's because you're a PUSSY THAT REPORTS.
I reported him  :klob :biden

Has anyone ever tried the Star Trek VR game?, its on sale right now
GAMER

bork

  • おっぱいは命、尻は故郷
  • Global Moderator
Re: star trek
« Reply #3319 on: May 23, 2020, 01:36:51 PM »
OK, that's it.

The other Trek thread is now the Star Trek thread.

http://www.thebore.com/forum/index.php?topic=47141.0
« Last Edit: May 23, 2020, 01:43:07 PM by bork »
ど助平