christ i hope some scientist manages to resurrect a stegosaur so it fucks you to death
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
openly admit to watching presstv brehs
I wonder what kind of pussy maoism gets you in the US
Luke Bruce1 week ago (edited)I am 40 minutes in and Jason is losing big time. Why don't you counter attack his baseless claims?Sargon claims people are getting a lot more nutrition under capitalism than socialism when evidence contradicts it. Almost every single ex-Eastern Bloc country has seen a massive decrease in the meat consumption.Sargon claims 'capitalism' (and he is deceptively using this description even though he means free market liberalism) is making every country rich when in fact the most successful capitalistic countries were usually quite anti free market (Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, modern day China).Quite disappointed. DemocraticSocialist01 would have done better.
Argos Panoptes1 week agoThis debate was cancerous as hell. Why didn’t Jason counter many of Sargon’s assertions? One of the easiest was how capitalism create innovations. We know that the state invents most things like lithium battery way before the capitalists step in.
Eshu1 week ago (edited)How can a white first worlder, who has never been to the third world, is not from the third world more than likely does not even know anyone from the third world say that the third world is getting richer? According to what sources? American sources made by people that equally fits into the above description. There would not be huge immigration from Latin America to the US, & from the Middle East & Africa to the EU if that was the case. Liberalism is the solution to solving class conflict according to Sargon, then why hasn't it? We had 500 years of liberalism,where is our Utopia? Why aren't we all Mark Zukerbergs?
Jake Hall1 week agoSorry jason but this is a loss for the DPRK there is no way of holding the U.S accountable for their actions without nuclear deterrence. Saying otherwise is completly naive. I hope Un stands his ground and keeps the nukes but my hope is low
the maoist dream 19841 week agothe nuclear program should not be abandoned until reunification and even then the dprk needs the nukes in order to be safe from invasion, if you trust in the US, you are already lost. this is not a smart move from Kim Jong-un unless he is some kind of genius who has a master plan.
PERMANENT SILENCER3 days agoIF KIM JONG SELLS OUT N.KOREA AFTER SO LONG & SURRENDERS TO USA- WILL BE SEEN AS WEAK BY MUCH OF WORLD, LIKE ANOTHER GORBACHEV. EVEN IF HE PERSONALLY LIKES SOME ASPECTS OF USA CULTURE, HE NEEDS TO STAY INDEPENDENT FROM USA INFLUENCE. HE SHOULD ONLY COMPROMISE WHEN USA TROOPS ARE FULLY SENT HOME. WHY SHOULDNT S.KOREA SIMPLY JOIN THE NORTH KOREAN SYSTEM LIKE VIETNAM, THIS IS WHY KOREAN WAR WAS FOUGHT IN 1ST PLACE.
Editor: The following is a post that was written by someone I know who wishes to remain anonymous. We will call him “Comrade M”. It seeks to ask questions regarding NEETS, incels, “forever alones” and the like. Can we consider them a new group of undesirables? What is their relationship to the class structure of the first world?Jason Unruhe
While the first world is still decades away from the possibility of real struggle being conducted, a distinct caste is rising in the first world, one which transcends class barriers. This caste exists outside of past terminology, as while there is a strong economic element to it, it is determined not strictly by economics, but also by the social sphere in a way that transcends traditional class analysis. These generally impoverished – many people within it live as modern-day vagabonds, travelling from city to city in their vans for temp work. Some are “NEETS”, middle and high school dropouts, generally physically or psychologically disabled, dependant either on poverty wage jobs, or welfare. Some are FOREVER ALONE or INCELS, – unattractive, physically disabled, or deformed people – generally, but not limited to men, incapable of forming romantic or sexual relations, or in many cases even friendships – most of them suffer from severe mental illness, depression, suicidal tendencies, etc. Large elements of indigenous communities, migrant/refugee labourers, the physically and mentally disabled/ill, drug addicts, and the homeless can be lumped into this makeshift “caste” of social undesirables. While many of these groups may have been classified by Marxist-Leninists and Maoists as a part of the Lumpenproletariat, this classification has limited scientific use in regards to understanding this umbrella caste.The bonding factor between all of these groups is that they exist – both economically and socially, in precarious conditions. They have no real social base and are alienated from any kind of community, or social circles. They are generally miserable – depressed, angry. They are desperate for answers, disillusioned with Capitalism and Rainbow Empire, and are open to radicalization in a way that most people in the first world are not. They are, in a real sense, a part of the growing revolutionary subject within the west today.Unfortunately, the Imperial so-called “communism” movement have disowned and denounced these people. They treat them as if they are barely human. Vicious, evil, when these are one of the few genuine pockets of people with real revolutionary potential in our pre-reproletarized west today, along with the lowest rungs of the working class, indigenous people, and migrant labourers. Lenin said we must go “Lower and deeper” among the masses to organize for revolution, and yet the social-imperial “left” continue to align with some of the most privileged demographics in the world, e.g., college Queer activists, quasi third position “lefty” racialists, and flavor of the day college IDPol activists – roots stemming overwhelmingly from the global bourgeoisie, or “Labor Aristocracy”. This caste have been forced into the arms of the reactionaries as a result of the failure of the western left – In forming analysis of material conditions in the western world, and also in failing to organize the scattered, albeit growing genuine pockets of revolutionary potential in the west.
spoiler (click to show/hide)*extremely MTW voice* doesn't this belong in the laissez faire thread?[close]
