Author Topic: VOAT Containment Megathread of Trash People for Trash People  (Read 3726153 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

zepblackstar

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11220 on: February 20, 2017, 11:30:41 PM »
Nothing really reinforces how weak and juvenile schadenfreude is than seeing the most unbearable posters of GAF do it for a whole day. I think I went from "FINALLY!" to "alright, enough" one hour after finding out Milo is cooked. You'd almost think they accomplished something themselves even though it was their right-wing nemesis that did the job they couldn't.

They also seem real focused on the appearance on Maher's show, but the only reason Milo got on in the first place was because of the left-wing campus violence and intimidation. That ended up being a smokescreen for Milo, and his foot into the door. It only blew up in his face because the conservatives really didn't want him to keynote CPAC. A cruel irony would be if it was because he's flamboyantly gay (if not a walking mockery of Christianity).

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=230672717&postcount=3003
Quote
Invalid Post specified. If you followed a valid link, please notify the administrator

What did I miss? Bobby linked The Bore and then people freaked out?

pedo defense force

Coax

  • Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11221 on: February 21, 2017, 12:06:47 AM »
Shut it down folks. Back to serious discussions.

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1345975

zomgee

  • We've *all*
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11222 on: February 21, 2017, 12:07:10 AM »
http://m.neogaf.com/showthread.php?t=1345975

Of course they lock the useful lifehack thread.

GODDAMMIT JOHN WATERS
rub

clothedmacuser

  • Defender of Centrist Scum
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11223 on: February 21, 2017, 12:25:11 AM »

Milo goes beyond flamboyantly gay into camp parody gay territory.

He is desperate to prove how gay he is.  Like he studied tapes of 90's raves to figure it out.
sigh

thisismyusername

  • GunOn™! Apply directly to forehead!
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11224 on: February 21, 2017, 12:31:28 AM »
Does anyone have the full Milo transcript for this drama? From the way some articles make it out to what he said about his age gap, I'm not overly squicked by an 8 year difference, as (from common stories I've heard) that's a thing that does happen. (Which I guess feeds the "homosexuals are all pedophiles" stereotype) It's still a shitty thing, but I mean it's a trope in some gay fiction.

etiolate

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11225 on: February 21, 2017, 12:54:22 AM »
Months ago, he made edgy, sensational quips about sex with a priest as a young catholic boy, but revealed he was 17 and the priest was 28(?) and they dated for a decade. He said something about some younger people being able to consent, but the age of consent as a line the public draws to protect the young. Or something like that.

There mighta been something about him being taken advantage of as a youth but I can't find any solid truth from him on that.  It's fuckin Milo. He finally riled up enough people to lose daddy approval.

thisismyusername

  • GunOn™! Apply directly to forehead!
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11226 on: February 21, 2017, 12:55:35 AM »
It used to be a trope in straight fiction but has been used less. The "man maker" woman being a teen boys first conquest yadda yadda.

Exactly what I was thinking as well.  I think Milo's point (and that's not to defend it, as much as it sounds like it) is more that homosexuals don't have as many "prospects" for exploring their sexuality in their age group, so teens seek men in their 20-30's that are coming out of their "rage" as a... I don't know what you'd call it, experimental launch-pad(?). On one-hand, it's shitty (and in that story I linked a like... 40-50 year old priest sexually harasses the main character [who doesn't accept the advances], only for the main character to meet up with like a 20-30 year old man in a cemetery to get blown [or be blown? Forgetting...] as a "yeah, I'm gay" moment) and can be considered pedophilia. But on the other hand, it's like 8 years difference. Would these folks still be outraged if it was like 18 to 26?

Not defending the practice, but I mean I can understand where Milo is coming from as shitty as it sounds.

It used to be a trope in straight fiction but has been used less. The "man maker" woman being a teen boys first conquest yadda yadda.

Exactly what I was thinking as well.  I think Milo's point (and that's not to defend it, as much as it sounds like it) is more that homosexuals don't have as many "prospects" for exploring their sexuality in their age group, so teens seek men in their 20-30's that are coming out of their "rage" as a... I don't know what you'd call it, experimental launch-pad(?). On one-hand, it's shitty (and in that story I linked a like... 40-50 year old priest sexually harasses the main character [who doesn't accept the advances], only for the main character to meet up with like a 20-30 year old man in a cemetery to get blown [or be blown? Forgetting...] as a "yeah, I'm gay" moment) and can be considered pedophilia. But on the other hand, it's like 8 years difference. Would these folks still be outraged if it was like 18 to 26?

Not defending the practice, but I mean I can understand where Milo is coming from as shitty as it sounds.

Counter-point: Some of those gay teens do have folks within their age-ranges (13-15 to 13-15 year olds) to experiment with (and since it seems like homosexuality/exploring your sexuality is slowly being accepted, maybe teenagers will stop being shitty to the point where these gay teens are driven to older men? IDK).

It's definitely a shitty quip, but like I said: I can sort-of see where he's coming from in that aspect.

etiolate

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11227 on: February 21, 2017, 01:18:57 AM »
There's certain topics that people are scared of discussing, but that tends to leave the topics in the hands of the worst people. One example I came across this past month is group differences in genes and traits among humans. These aren't "racial differences", as they aren't different races, but simply the observation of the same patterns of differentiation we observe in every other species being observed in humans. There is no superior trait, but something akin to difference in feather color.

However, we are so afraid of discussing difference so as to avoid the ugliness of the past that these discussions only happen in tiny science groups and online in racist, supremacy groups. There's no reason that something as common as black Americans and white Americans having different hair or that Asians have different earwax from westerners should be left to hands of neonazis to form the discussion on. Our belief in equality, I feel, largely comes from a jeudo-christian view, but as our scientific view become more prominent, we'll have to involve real group differences into our value of equality.

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11228 on: February 21, 2017, 01:37:44 AM »
must be pretty awkward over at voat right now  :lol

curly

  • cultural maoist
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11229 on: February 21, 2017, 02:26:38 AM »
Funny how Milo wasn't taken down by rational debate with some open-minded lib but by him being stripped of his prominent speaking platforms because he said heinous shit

Looks like those crybabby sjws had the right idea all along

Boredfrom

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11230 on: February 21, 2017, 03:44:45 AM »
Funny how Milo wasn't taken down by rational debate with some open-minded lib but by him being stripped of his prominent speaking platforms because he said heinous shit

Looks like those crybabby sjws had the right idea all along

It just took years of feeding him and complaining about saying heinous said at daily basis until people found something that actually affected his bottom line.

...

Wait

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11231 on: February 21, 2017, 05:03:47 AM »
RobertRoberts's comeback at benjipwns using Bore links has been deleted  :heh
ὕβρις

VomKriege

  • Do the moron
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11232 on: February 21, 2017, 05:12:49 AM »
http://m.neogaf.com/showpost.php?p=230437827&postcount=473

Don't you ever equate me to that.
Don't you ever, ever, ever do that.
Don't equate me to fucking Steve Bannon's disgusting ilk because of that. Ever.


:trigger
ὕβρις

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11233 on: February 21, 2017, 06:03:49 AM »
I can't imagine how anyone (except the inner echo chamber) would want to discuss anything on neogaf again after how the PDP stuff played out.

counterhit

  • Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11234 on: February 21, 2017, 06:12:05 AM »
I can't imagine how anyone (except the inner echo chamber) would want to discuss anything on neogaf again after how the PDP stuff played out.

There's plenty of topics that don't manifest themselves in this way. Plenty of good people who have interesting things to say. It's merely a matter of staying out of the way of ideologues or egotistical mods (and if it comes to it, delusional console fanboys). It's unfortunate this shit is all tied to the hip and these good people will eventually find themselves perma-banned, but I won't count out the whole thing. There's a nice add-on which allows you to hide threads, handy for whenever Lime decides to make one.

daemon

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11235 on: February 21, 2017, 07:33:40 AM »
I can't imagine how anyone (except the inner echo chamber) would want to discuss anything on neogaf again after how the PDP stuff played out.

There's plenty of topics that don't manifest themselves in this way. Plenty of good people who have interesting things to say. It's merely a matter of staying out of the way of ideologues or egotistical mods (and if it comes to it, delusional console fanboys). It's unfortunate this shit is all tied to the hip and these good people will eventually find themselves perma-banned, but I won't count out the whole thing. There's a nice add-on which allows you to hide threads, handy for whenever Lime decides to make one.

I've read from a few people that they actually received PMs thanking them for saying stuff they didn't dare to say. People are scared shitless of losing their account, and the dogpilers and people who generally only offer hostility towards fellow users are mostly unscathed or have the threshold of perma ban set on unlimited.

I imagine the forum is still full of legit nice people, they just don't want to be taken out one by one. The repression on GAF is incredible.

Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11236 on: February 21, 2017, 10:02:46 AM »
Once upon a time, you could say something like "I don't understand transgender issues" and you wouldn't get banned. I know, because I said that very thing like 6 years ago. I didn't understand. Thanks to actual discussion and sources provided, I was able to better educate myself. If I asked that very question now, I'd get dogpiled, called names and banned. Simply for not having the fortune to know any trans individuals in my daily life and wanting to know more about a hot button social issue.

I get that Trump conservatives became just smart enough to pretend to "just ask questions," but their blanket quashing of legitimate discussion makes the forum exactly as destructive to discourse as r/the_donald.  They fact they're equally oppressive about progressive issues doesn't change anything.

Also, it's a bit of wishful thinking that Milo is done for. He's got hoards of people blaming THE MEDIA for taking his comments out of context. The book will be published, he'll continue to get air time and his sycophantic followers will hand wave away literally anything. Nobody that supported him had even heard of the CPAC until he was disallowed to speak there. 

Rufus

  • 🙈🙉🙊
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11237 on: February 21, 2017, 10:13:36 AM »
However, we are so afraid of discussing difference so as to avoid the ugliness of the past that these discussions only happen in tiny science groups and online in racist, supremacy groups. There's no reason that something as common as black Americans and white Americans having different hair or that Asians have different earwax from westerners should be left to hands of neonazis to form the discussion on.
Maybe I don't frequent the right/wrong circles, but I've never seen people shy away from acknowledging those obvious differences. What is there even to discuss? I mean, what would that even look like? "Nuh, it's uh - not genes. The sun uh-..." I don't get it. I learned about the earwax when it was mentioned on Reddit in a TIL or something. It's neat trivia to people.

I expected you to mention IQ, which is regularly brought up as proof of white european superiority by the usual suspects.

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11238 on: February 21, 2017, 11:12:59 AM »
RobertRoberts's comeback at benjipwns using Bore links has been deleted  :heh

Why didn't y'all link it?

I did.

daemon

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11239 on: February 21, 2017, 12:35:16 PM »
Once upon a time, you could say something like "I don't understand transgender issues" and you wouldn't get banned. I know, because I said that very thing like 6 years ago. I didn't understand. Thanks to actual discussion and sources provided, I was able to better educate myself. If I asked that very question now, I'd get dogpiled, called names and banned. Simply for not having the fortune to know any trans individuals in my daily life and wanting to know more about a hot button social issue.

I get that Trump conservatives became just smart enough to pretend to "just ask questions," but their blanket quashing of legitimate discussion makes the forum exactly as destructive to discourse as r/the_donald.  They fact they're equally oppressive about progressive issues doesn't change anything.

Also, it's a bit of wishful thinking that Milo is done for. He's got hoards of people blaming THE MEDIA for taking his comments out of context. The book will be published, he'll continue to get air time and his sycophantic followers will hand wave away literally anything. Nobody that supported him had even heard of the CPAC until he was disallowed to speak there.

concern trolling/just asking questions is a minimal harm. if you see the same guy in 50 thread asking the same questions, ell then there's a pattern. Nothing warrants the current paranoia on GAF.

bork

  • おっぱいは命、尻は故郷
  • Global Moderator
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11240 on: February 21, 2017, 02:22:15 PM »
ど助平

FStop7

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11241 on: February 21, 2017, 02:42:40 PM »
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1346141

Woman gets grabbed at and shit but the usual cac squad cries out about a broken mirror.

tiesto

  • ルカルカ★ナイトフィーバー
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11242 on: February 21, 2017, 02:55:03 PM »
Also, it's a bit of wishful thinking that Milo is done for. He's got hoards of people blaming THE MEDIA for taking his comments out of context. The book will be published, he'll continue to get air time and his sycophantic followers will hand wave away literally anything. Nobody that supported him had even heard of the CPAC until he was disallowed to speak there.

Right on the money, I just sent a text saying "Milo Pedopoulous" to an alt-right friend of mine who's a big fan of Breitbart, and yup he's already talking about how the media is taking the comments out of context and blowing up what should be a non issue.
^_^

Cerveza mas fina

  • I don't care for Islam tbqh
  • filler
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11243 on: February 21, 2017, 03:24:06 PM »

Dennis

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11244 on: February 21, 2017, 04:01:07 PM »
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1346141

Woman gets grabbed at and shit but the usual cac squad cries out about a broken mirror.

You go girl.

railGUN

  • If my bones are breaking would you tell me that I'm weak?
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11245 on: February 21, 2017, 04:38:52 PM »
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=230747825&postcount=70

Quote
This is a tricky problem to handle, I think.

If you say kids can go in the bathroom of their gender it's too open for abuse, imo. I can imagine boys that will SAY they identify female just to get in the girls bathroom. It will be a small minority, but that's enough to cause problems. And so how do you determine who's legit or not?

Unisex bathrooms would solve this, but may not be realistic in some schools. Adding a new bathroom may not be a realistic option, so schools could convert bathrooms to unisex. But then there are some kids who would feel uncomfortable using a bathroom with the opposite gender. Depending on the layout of the school this could mean walking fairly far away from classrooms to the bathroom. It could turn into a logistical nightmare.

I'm just saying that it's tricky, that it's going to be hard to find one solution that works for every school in the country, so the wording might be strange.

Dude is getting dogpiled for this comment.  :lol
Fish<

stufte

  • Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11246 on: February 21, 2017, 05:56:47 PM »
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=230747825&postcount=70

Quote
This is a tricky problem to handle, I think.

If you say kids can go in the bathroom of their gender it's too open for abuse, imo. I can imagine boys that will SAY they identify female just to get in the girls bathroom. It will be a small minority, but that's enough to cause problems. And so how do you determine who's legit or not?

Unisex bathrooms would solve this, but may not be realistic in some schools. Adding a new bathroom may not be a realistic option, so schools could convert bathrooms to unisex. But then there are some kids who would feel uncomfortable using a bathroom with the opposite gender. Depending on the layout of the school this could mean walking fairly far away from classrooms to the bathroom. It could turn into a logistical nightmare.

I'm just saying that it's tricky, that it's going to be hard to find one solution that works for every school in the country, so the wording might be strange.

Dude is getting dogpiled for this comment.  :lol

IDGAF where someone pisses or shits and his concern is easily refuted, but jesus this post:

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=230756801&postcount=123



Quote
Quote
Originally Posted by Jarsonot

Well, you certainly shouldn't suicide. I'm not sure you know what you're talking about when you say "people like you" however. I'm not talking about rapes, or assaults. I'm talking about a bunch of juveniles who would be allowed to go into an opposite gender bathroom, who would go in just to cause trouble. I don't have any studies on this, I don't need studies on this as I'm not making a policy on this. I do have an opinion on this and my opinion is as follows: I think that there is the possibility of abuse of this law in schools because schools have a bunch of juveniles. See, that's the hypothesis. Studies would verify or discredit this. I haven't done that, no.
So, first of all: I absolutely know what I'm talking about when I say "people like you". People like you, who claim to be "just asking questions", and are "totally for rights, guys", but ultimately are just lying because you know it's bullshit. If you haven't read studies, haven't done ANY research at all, why the fuck are you even entertaining this idea unless to just fuck with trans people? You are aware of bullying, right? I know we aren't talking about rapes and assaults, but when you are telling a transgirl who passes "oh, sorry, you have a penis so you have to use the boys restroom. Good luck!" Just because you think some shitheads might try to look at girls in the restroom, you are responsible for those transgirls getting bullied or injured because of that. Period. Don't spout bullshit because "you aren't making policies". People like you are the reason these policies are able to happen in the first place. People like you are the reason we can't feel comfortable just coming out as trans.
Quote
Originally Posted by Jarsonot

4. I don't think it's that easy. It's certainly easy to type, but actually to do? Who tells the kid to go fuck themselves? Like the unisex bathrooms it's going to be a social shift, and instead of telling opponents to go duck themselves, you should try rational dialog. I think a student who identifies female should use the female restroom, and I think it's completely understandable if that makes someone uncomfortable at first blush. I have to respect both those views. If it's going to work, we're going to have to get both sides talking.
No, we are past the point of that being respectable. You do not need to respect those views. We don't respect people who want racially segregated water fountains. I sure as shit don't have to respect you for wanting me in a male restroom.

This feels like an alt of someone who was banned.

Boredfrom

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11247 on: February 21, 2017, 05:58:30 PM »
I can't imagine how anyone (except the inner echo chamber) would want to discuss anything on neogaf again after how the PDP stuff played out.

Let's not act like online discourse hasn't been incredibly binary since the beginning. I find it hilarious that PewDiePie was the most reviled person amongst true gamers until he got called out for a dumb joke. Should show you that when it comes to the internet, and most people in general, a lot of the time most things are used as a platform to argue endlessly without getting anywhere.

Shit, I fall into that shit a lot too. At least I'm somewhat aware of it.

Being fair, more than being called out for a dumb joke  or doing it while having a contract with Disney, he was labelled anti Semitic because some out of context jokes. Is not exactly the kind of stuff wish to happen to someone that, at best, is considered a mild annoyance.

In the other side of the spectrum, I don't feel sorry by people like Milo getting the L

MMaRsu

  • Administrator
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11248 on: February 21, 2017, 06:38:30 PM »
Do you guys ever just spend the whole night gaming instead of sleeping and then going to work

or is that like what only

 :nerds

would do
What

Rufus

  • 🙈🙉🙊
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11249 on: February 21, 2017, 06:56:42 PM »
I have insomnia sometimes, but I'm usually too zapped to actually do anything but watch random Youtube videos.

daemon

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11250 on: February 21, 2017, 08:40:43 PM »
stuff

And then you have Trump, who after becoming literally Hitler in the last two years won the presidency. I think the internet is simply destroying the way reality is understood, and every new generation of people will be even more out of touch with the palpable reality.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11251 on: February 21, 2017, 09:02:51 PM »
In 1952, a pro-Eisenhower delegate said of the Taft delegates taking control of the Texas delegation to the Republican Convention through rules manipulation that "Hitler never did anything rottener."

Four years earlier Truman himself compared the Republican Congress to supporters of Hitler and also regularly pointed out that Thomas Dewey had a mustache just like Hitler did.

Quote
Governor Pat Brown of California said, “Goldwater's acceptance speech had the stench of fascism. All we needed to hear was Heil Hitler.” Mayor Jack Shelley of San Francisco claimed that Goldwater strategists got all their ideas from Mein Kampf.

Even though Goldwater had been an early NAACP member, NAACP leader Roy Wilkins warned, "Those who say that the doctrine of ultra-conservatism offers no menace should remember that a man come out of the beer halls of Munich and rallied the forces of rightism in Germany. All the same elements are there in San Francisco now."

The NAACP accused Goldwater of appealing to “fear and bigotry”. Martin Luther King said, “We see danger signs of Hitlerism in the candidacy of Mr. Goldwater.”

Union leaders launched a national campaign to denounce Goldwater as Hitler II. "I have drawn a parallel between Goldwater and Hitler and I make no apology for drawing that parallel," George Meany of the AFL-CIO declared.

just take off the "online"

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11252 on: February 21, 2017, 09:05:15 PM »
it almost makes you want to look up who people used before the 1930s

Napoleon probably for some time, George III obviously here in the colonies

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11253 on: February 21, 2017, 09:21:45 PM »
we've also already had one Presidential candidate considered dangerous to the nation argue that the press criticizing him only made him stronger:



 :doge

daemon

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11254 on: February 21, 2017, 09:48:47 PM »
benji pls, don't triple post.

/backseatmod


http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1346169

so many psychopaths in such a tiny room.
« Last Edit: February 21, 2017, 09:54:17 PM by daemon »

Joe Molotov

  • I'm much more humble than you would understand.
  • Administrator
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11255 on: February 21, 2017, 09:51:27 PM »
That's just what Robespierre would do!
©@©™

Syph

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11256 on: February 21, 2017, 09:56:34 PM »
XO

Let's Cyber

  • Banned (duration pending)
  • Senior Member

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11258 on: February 21, 2017, 10:35:37 PM »
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1346169
Quote
Quote
There were people saying that on GAF. I wonder where they all are now????
Thankfully we have mods that don't entertain trolls

zomgee

  • We've *all*
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11259 on: February 21, 2017, 11:02:16 PM »
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1346169
Fuck Milo


Bye, Felicia.

(Image removed from quote.)

It's been said that people see what they want to see. For example, when I see Milo's logo, I see a man bent over on all fours, ass in air.


rub

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11260 on: February 21, 2017, 11:04:09 PM »
probably intentional

Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11261 on: February 21, 2017, 11:04:14 PM »
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=230747825&postcount=70

Quote
This is a tricky problem to handle, I think.

If you say kids can go in the bathroom of their gender it's too open for abuse, imo. I can imagine boys that will SAY they identify female just to get in the girls bathroom. It will be a small minority, but that's enough to cause problems. And so how do you determine who's legit or not?

Unisex bathrooms would solve this, but may not be realistic in some schools. Adding a new bathroom may not be a realistic option, so schools could convert bathrooms to unisex. But then there are some kids who would feel uncomfortable using a bathroom with the opposite gender. Depending on the layout of the school this could mean walking fairly far away from classrooms to the bathroom. It could turn into a logistical nightmare.

I'm just saying that it's tricky, that it's going to be hard to find one solution that works for every school in the country, so the wording might be strange.

Dude is getting dogpiled for this comment.  :lol

Just remember, every time a trans person is raped or murdered because they couldn't use the restroom they needed to, it's your fault. Period.

zomgee

  • We've *all*
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11262 on: February 21, 2017, 11:06:51 PM »
Bobby Roberts
rub

zomgee

  • We've *all*
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11263 on: February 21, 2017, 11:07:09 PM »
Sorry I didn't want him to feel left out.
rub

zomgee

  • We've *all*
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11264 on: February 21, 2017, 11:07:26 PM »
Shit, new page: Bobby Roberts.
rub

Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11265 on: February 21, 2017, 11:09:32 PM »
Robert Roberts.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11266 on: February 21, 2017, 11:10:59 PM »
Bobby Roberts.

Adolf Hitler.

Bobby Roberts.

Hitler.

Bobby Roberts.

Hitler.

spoiler (click to show/hide)
[close]

FStop7

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11267 on: February 21, 2017, 11:14:30 PM »
is this the douchey mcflannel Portlandia version of beetlejuice

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11268 on: February 21, 2017, 11:23:13 PM »
nope, no new GAF PMs

etiolate

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11269 on: February 21, 2017, 11:41:28 PM »
is this the douchey mcflannel Portlandia version of beetlejuice

that seems redundant

agrajag

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11270 on: February 21, 2017, 11:45:54 PM »
Robert Bobbets

Momo

  • Nebuchadnezzar
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11271 on: February 21, 2017, 11:49:25 PM »
WHY DID YOU SAY THAT NAME??!

etiolate

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11272 on: February 21, 2017, 11:52:03 PM »
Well, let's make it worth the time then.

New Ghostbusters sucked and nobody would care about Kate McKinnon if she didn't lick lady pie. She's the less-comedy version of David Spade to Melissa McCarthy's less-coked Chris Farley.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11273 on: February 21, 2017, 11:54:13 PM »
nobody would care about Kate McKinnon if she didn't lick lady pie.
:bolo

etiolate

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11274 on: February 21, 2017, 11:56:00 PM »
Also, Leslie Jones stole Tracy Morgan's act while he was out with a coma and has never apologized for it.

helios

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11275 on: February 22, 2017, 12:00:27 AM »
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=230775794&postcount=659

Quote from: Sblargh;230775794
But this "movement of gamers" just remind me that we were the front line

And we failed.

You had one job, GAF! One job!

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=230775892&postcount=660
Quote from: Suikoguy;230775892
I'm proud to be part of a forum that did not let that bullshit have a place.
But the gaming community itself failed.

We won the battle, but not the war.

benjipwns

  • your bright ideas always burn me
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11276 on: February 22, 2017, 12:02:43 AM »
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=230776057&postcount=662
Quote
Us. We all tried. The industry giants on the other hand are the ones who failed to do anything at all. Their idea to stay silent, even game news sites, only allowed the festering germ grow into cancerous poison.

stufte

  • Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior Senior
  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11277 on: February 22, 2017, 12:03:50 AM »
Bobby Roberts


helios

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11278 on: February 22, 2017, 12:05:27 AM »
If you say Bobby Roberts' name three times, he'll post a link to his blog.

etiolate

  • Senior Member
Re: Safe-space hugbox thread
« Reply #11279 on: February 22, 2017, 12:08:56 AM »
If you say Bobby Roberts' name three times, he'll post a link to him posting a link his blog.

Edited for accuracy.